This Week in the News

John Bolton Raid Shows Weaponization of FBI 

The Guardian wrote on August 22: 

“When Kash Patel, the FBI director, faced senators during his confirmation hearings on 30 January,  he bristled at suggestions that his 2023 book contained an ‘enemies list’. The appendix to Government Gangsters, which included a list of names of around 60 people, was simply documentation of those who had ‘weaponized’ the government, he insisted. 

“Seven months later, that denial appears increasingly hollow. Friday’s FBI search of the former national security adviser John Bolton’s home and office, reportedly to find classified documents, marks the fifth investigation targeting people from Patel’s book. Bolton now joins a growing list of Trump critics from Patel’s roll the administration has targeted with what appear to be retaliatory federal investigations… 

“Bolton’s investigation… is unprecedented in how it is calculated to target a critic…” 

Deutsche Welle added on August 22: 

“… his critics claim Patel lacks experience to lead the FBI, and point to his previous statements about going after Trump’s political enemies… Trump himself was… indicted by a Florida court for retaining classified documents at his private Mar-a-Lago beach club. That case was dropped in 2024 after Trump was elected. Patel had given interviews blasting the raids by federal agents on Trump’s residence related to the case.  

“John Bolton served as national security adviser during the first term of Donald Trump, but has since turned into an outspoken critic of the US president, often questioning the president’s mental aptitude. Since leaving the first Trump administration, Bolton has been widely critical of Trump and his policies, especially on the second administration’s handling of the war in Ukraine. During an interview with DW in June, Bolton said he believes Vladimir Putin perceives Trump as a ‘useful idiot.’ ‘He doesn’t know history, he doesn’t read briefing papers,’ Bolton said, referring to Trump.  

“In a DW interview yesterday, Bolton said Trump did not understand the situation on the ground in Ukraine, assuming that he could ‘bounce Ukraine and Russia into a peace deal in a couple of weeks and therefore get the Nobel Prize for it.’”  

In this light, the FBI’s action clearly looks like political retribution and persecution of a popular Trump critic. The FBI’s action most certainly reminds us of the FBI raid on Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate to locate “classified” information. 

More to Come? 

The Hill wrote on August 23: 

“Miles Taylor, a former Department of Homeland Security (DHS) official, signaled Saturday that he could be the next target of President Trump’s FBI… ‘Yeah, we expect it… we can… be so certain of the president’s revenge campaign to know potentially who that next target might be or one of those next targets.’

“The former DHS aide added, ‘I mean when my wife and I woke up and saw the news, she basically said to me, “It’s coming.”’… 

“The search of Bolton’s home and office marked an escalation in the feud between Trump and his former national security adviser, with critics seeing it as a potential act of retribution. Taylor, who previously suggested the president kept a ‘blacklist’ for persecution, said as much… ‘Folks don’t have to play the violin for John Bolton or Miles Taylor. Maybe they don’t like either of us. That’s fine, because it’s not about us… It’s about the criminal justice system that all Americans expect to be able to treat them fairly… It’s a president of the U.S. weaponizing the tools of his office to reshape our society. And he’s doing that. He’s making sure the scales of justice tip in his favor… There’s no telling where this could go next.’ 

“Trump told reporters at the White House on Friday that he was not told ahead of time about the raid… Vice President J.D. Vance defended the raid…, pushing back on allegations that the raid is related to retribution.” 

In fact, Trump declared that he didn’t want to know about it” (compare Fortune, dated August 23). 

JD Vance’s Comments Very Suspicious 

Raw Story wrote on August 23: 

“Hours after FBI Director gave the go-ahead to his agents to raid the home and office of John Bolton, Vice President J.D. Vance was well prepared and ready to discuss it with NBC’s Kristin Welker during an extensive interview… Vance stated, ‘We are investigating Ambassador Bolton, but if they ultimately bring a case, it will be because they determine that he has broken the law. We’re going to be careful about that… You should let the law drive these determinations, and that’s what we’re doing.’

After watching a clip of the Vance interview…, former DHS official Miles Taylor claimed Vance’s comments should set off alarms. ‘This is very, very unusual for the vice president to be this read into a criminal investigation that he should be at arm’s length from… And then… we heard that the CIA director himself might have been the one to provide the evidence to the FBI director.’ 

“‘You know, as more of these details come out, it’s starting to look completely unprecedented that all of these very top senior officials that work under Donald Trump, that know he wants to get revenge against John Bolton, are personally involved in the investigation of John Bolton,’ he added. ‘I mean, the vice president’s attestation that this had nothing to do with revenge was about as believable as what… the administration has said on the Epstein files, because it would be a truly extraordinary coincidence that they’ve decided to focus their investigative powers on a man that Donald Trump has wanted investigated for years.’” 

It does not pass the smell test for sure. And Trump did not know anything about this, while Vance knew all about it? 

Right-Wing Media Skeptical of FBI Raid 

The Independent wrote on August 24: 

“The investigation has sparked criticism from usually reliably supportive right-wing media outlets. On Friday, panelists appearing on Fox News’ America’s Newsroom said they were ‘skeptical’ of the FBI’s decision to execute the raid. 

Chris Swecker, former assistant FBI director from 2004 to 2006, said that he had consulted with former agency colleagues about the raid. ‘We’re looking at this a little bit skeptically because we were very heavily critical of the Mar-a-Lago raid. Just because you have the authority and discretion to do something like this, doesn’t mean you should,’ he told Fox News… 

“Attorney and Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley alluded to the ‘longstanding disagreement’ between Trump and Bolton. ‘There is a great concern about whether this is retaliation against a political opponent,’ he said… 

“Other conservative media warned that the raid could signal Trump is using the FBI to exact political retribution.  

“The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board said the raid reeks of political vengeance… Trump may hope that the raid leads Bolton to stop criticizing him publicly, the board suggested, adding that ‘the real offender here is a president who seems to think he can use the powers of his office to run vendettas’… the board… [characterized] the recent FBI raid…   a ‘vendetta campaign.’ The newspaper’s editorial board described [it] as ‘hard to see … as anything other than vindictive’… the board asserted that ‘it is increasingly clear that vengeance is a large part, maybe the largest part of how [Trump] will define success in his second term.’… The editorial board also noted the immediate termination of Bolton’s protective security detail upon Trump’s return to the White House, despite threats to his life connected to actions against Iran. ‘This is the kind of gratuitous viciousness that has increasingly defined Mr. Trump’s return to office,’ the board wrote… 

“The WSJ’s editorial board had previously warned about Trump and his allies pursuing political revenge, including in December 2024, weeks before his inauguration. ‘We said this was one of the risks of a second Trump term, and it’s turning out to be worse than we imagined,’ the board wrote.”

The whole matter is also suspicious for the simple reason that a highly publicized blowup occurred between Attorney General Pam Bondi (supported by Trump) and FBI Director Kath Patel and his deputy, Dan Bongino, in the screwed-up Epstein matter, with Bongino threatening to quit. Is the FBI perhaps trying to regain Trump’s favor? 

Maxwell’s Fairy Tales 

The Independent wrote on August 23: 

“Skepticism abounds following the release of transcripts and recordings of Ghislaine Maxwell’s testimony to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. Four years after her conviction and sentencing on charges of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking and other crimes, how credible is her testimony? 

“Ranking House Oversight Committee Democrat Rep. Robert Garcia was especially damning in the hours after the interview transcripts were released Friday, writing on X: ‘Ghislaine Maxwell is a convicted sex trafficker and known liar. Her interview with Trump’s DOJ lawyer shows she’s desperate for a pardon. She claims no involvement in wrongdoing, which is insulting to the girls and young women she victimized and trafficked. She cannot be trusted.’… 

“Having been convicted of federal crimes, her only likely hope for getting out of prison early is either a pardon or a commutation from the president… In addition to her flattering portrayal of Trump, Maxwell also denied the existence of the infamous Epstein client list…. On Fox News, prime time host Jesse Watters… reminded viewers of the existence of a trove of… potential evidence: ‘The list doesn’t exist? So, flight manifests don’t exist? The surveillance tapes don’t exist? The bank records don’t exist?’ 

“Attorney and legal scholar Jonathan Turley joined Watters to share his thoughts… ‘She clearly also does want something from Trump; she wants a commutation… she is clearly angling for it.’…”

Maxwell also said that the famous picture with Prince Andrew and the underaged girl Virginia Giuffre was a fake, and that even though she does not believe that Epstein killed himself, he was not murdered because of fear that he could produce some discriminatory evidence against famous people, or blackmail them. 

So, now we are also to believe that elephants can fly? 

Virginia Giuffre’s Family Outraged 

NBC News wrote on August 23: 

“The family members of a prominent survivor of Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse said they were ‘outraged’ by the Justice Department’s decision to release transcripts from Ghislaine Maxwell’s testimony last month to a federal prosecutor, arguing it provided Maxwell a ‘platform to rewrite history.’ ‘The content of these transcripts is in direct contradiction with felon Ghislaine Maxwell’s conviction for child sex trafficking,’ the family of Virginia Roberts Giuffre said in a statement. The family added, ‘This travesty of justice entirely invalidates the experiences of the many brave survivors who put their safety, security, and lives on the line to ensure her conviction, including our sister.’ 

“During the interview last month…, Maxwell said Giuffre’s allegation against Andrew ‘doesn’t hold water,’ and disputed key facts in the case, including an alleged photo of Giuffre with Andrew… Giuffre’s family accused the deputy attorney general of not sufficiently challenging Maxwell’s assertions during her testimony, suggesting that by publicly releasing the interview, the Justice Department provided Maxwell the opportunity to dispute her case in the court of public opinion… 

“Giuffre’s family also condemned the Justice Department’s decision to transfer Maxwell to a minimum-security prison following her meeting with Blanche. ‘By moving convicted felon Maxwell to a minimum-security, country club prison, the DOJ sends a disturbing message that child sex trafficking is acceptable and will be rewarded,’ the family said Saturday in a statement.” 

It was also reported by the Miami Herald, dated August 23, that only 3% of the Jeffrey Epstein files turned over so far to a House committee this week, in response to a congressional subpoena, contained new information, and less than 1% of all the files, estimated to be around 100,000 pages, not in the public domain, have been released to the public. 

The Justice Department’s conduct in this entire matter is more than questionable. Trump’s statements are not helpful either, calling “the whole Epstein thing… a Democratic hoax.” Really? Tell that to the family of Virginia Giuffre and the many hundreds, if not thousands, of underaged victims. 

To Send or Not to Send? 

Deutsche Welle wrote on August 23: 

“Politicians have been arguing about whether Germany might send soldiers [to Ukraine] for a possible peacekeeping force… Many have said Germany could hardly be absent from such a force… in Germany, it seems clear that it will not be easy for Merz to obtain approval for such a force… 51%… were opposed to a German participation in a peace mission in Ukraine. Only 36% said they thought it would be the right thing to do… 

“… politicians from all political parties have been speaking out daily on the idea of deploying troops to Ukraine. Most of them are skeptical or flat-out opposed. Almost all of them point out that any decision on this matter is still a long way off. Politicians from eastern Germany are especially opposed to the plan… AfD leader Alice Weidel warned that Germany could itself become a target and demanded: ‘Germany needs reconciliation with Russia instead of constant confrontation.’ 

“Meanwhile, Wolfgang Ischinger, the long-standing head of the Munich Security Conference, wrote on X: ‘There is not a single indication that President Putin is prepared to end this war at the moment.’ Many observers in Germany agree.” 

The German government’s two coalition parties are hopelessly divided on about EVERY major issue. As Bild Online commented on August 23: 

“The CDU/CSU and SPD are emerging from the summer recess even more divided than when they entered it… There’s hardly a significant issue on which the coalition partners agree… Moreover, a deep mutual distrust has eaten into the coalition… After the three disastrous years of the traffic light coalition, Germany cannot afford another phase of standstill… this autumn will decide the future of the government—and of Germany.” 

Trump Very Angry With Ukraine 

Newsweek wrote on August 22: 

“President Donald Trump has expressed his anger at recent Ukrainian attacks that disabled the Russian oil pipeline Druzhba, which supplies Hungary and Slovakia, both NATO allies… ongoing attacks by both sides have frustrated the self-styled peacemaker Trump as he seeks to bring about an end to a war that has cost hundreds of thousands of lives and destroyed parts of Ukraine since Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022. 

“Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban shared a handwritten note from his political ally, Trump, in a private Facebook group for his supporters… Hungary has sought to stay out of the Russia-Ukraine war and maintain relations with the Russian government… It opposes Ukraine’s ambition to join the EU. The country has accused Brussels and Kyiv of seeking to drag it into the war. 

“Orban had written to Trump to complain about the attacks on Druzhba and the impact on Hungarian energy. Ukraine said the pipeline also supplies the invading Russian armed forces, which is why it was targeted. ‘Viktor—I do not like hearing this,’ Trump… wrote in the note. ‘I am very angry about it. Tell Slovakia. You are my great friend.’… 

“In the statement to which Trump had replied, Orban noted that Ukrainian strikes on Druzhba had happened days before the ‘historic meeting’ in Alaska between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Ukraine has since struck the pipeline again. ‘This pipeline supplies Hungary and Slovakia, two countries that have no other means of importing crude oil,’ Orban had said. ‘Hungary supports Ukraine with electricity and petrol, in return they bomb [a] pipeline that [supplies] us…’” 

Two More Weeks? 

The Sun wrote on August 23: 

“Donald Trump has announced that he will give Vladimir Putin a couple of weeks to set up a peace meeting with rival Volodymyr Zelensky… Trump said that there’s a ‘tremendous amount of hatred’ that he’s trying to navigate through as he fights for a ceasefire… 

“Kaja Kallas, the EU’s top diplomat, warned on Friday that Putin is laying a trap for the West by demanding to keep hold of Ukrainian land…. Trump has backed the need for ‘swapping of territories’ in peace negotiations – raising fears he could be strolling straight into this trap.” 

The Hill added on August 22: 

“One aspect of the deal that remains a sticking point is security guarantees. A possibility would be that Ukraine joins the European Union instead of joining NATO. On the recommendations of European leaders, Trump called Orban on Monday to attempt to sway his vote in order to let Ukraine join the EU’s 27 member states.  

“Orbán posted on Facebook that Ukraine’s accession to the EU ‘does not provide any security guarantees,’ therefore, ‘linking membership with security guarantees is unnecessary and dangerous.’” 

No Meeting Anytime Soon 

The New York Post wrote on August 24: 

“Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov threw up yet another roadblock Sunday to direct talks between his leader, Vladimir Putin, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky — suggesting that a summit is still far off… Lavrov said Sunday that Russia has an ‘agenda’ in mind that must to be agreed before the two sides can sit down together. ‘There is no meeting planned,’ Lavrov told [NBC].

“The summit to end the war will only happen if it has a ‘presidential agenda’ that pleases Russian President Vladimir Putin, he said — but that agenda is ‘not ready at all.’”

So why wait two more weeks? 

Ceasefire an Easy Fix? 

The Ron Paul Institute wrote on August 25: 

“Clearly no one in the world with a heart would like to see the fighting go on. So at first glance a ceasefire seems like a quick fix… Earlier in Ukraine hostilities both Germany and France achieved Putin’s agreement to a ceasefire while a negotiated peace agreement was underway. The efforts were called the Minsk Accords… 

“Certainly [Friedrich] Merz [Germany’s Chancellor] must know the background of this. He would be remiss not to understand that a ceasefire without a peace agreement might be as unattainable as the end of a rainbow.” 

Russia Threatens to March on Paris 

Express wrote on August 26: 

“Russia has issued a terrifying warning to France as tensions between the two countries threaten to explode. The French President is the latest Western leader to be singled out for rough treatment by Kremlin propagandists and to become ‘public enemy number one’… During an interview with the French TV news network LCI, Emmanuel Macron called Putin ‘a predator and an ogre at our doorstep.’ The remarks seemingly went down like a lead balloon with the sensitive Kremlin tyrant, who unleashed his propaganda hounds on the unfortunate Macron. Vladimir Solovyov has relished his role as the Putin regime’s top attack dog… 

“Once again referencing deep Russian grievances about Nato expansion, the Kremlin stooge said [on his TV show]: ‘Originally, back in December 2021, we stated that NATO moving closer to our borders was unacceptable… And now they’re saying: “We’ll be at your borders, we’ll send Nato troops there. That’s why we’ll be on Champs-Elysées. And Macron will be polishing the boots of a Russian officer.’… The last time Russian soldiers graced Paris with their presence was in the aftermath of the Napoleonic wars in the 19th century. Russian forces, along with other Coalition allies, reached and entered the French capital on March 31, 1814.” 

Russian Children Taught to Murder 

The New York Post wrote on August 27: 

“Baby-faced Russian children as young as 8 have been taught how to throw hand grenades and carry rifles at a bizarre summer camp designed to train up the next generation of Putin’s military. The twisted exercises, supervised by soldiers who have fought in Russia’s war in Ukraine, saw young children given real rifles or convincing replicas at a camp in the Rostov region, close to the Ukrainian border…

“Some 83 children — ages 8-17 — took part in last week’s activities, including a ‘route march’ along the River Don involving running and crawling on their bellies across sand and shallow water while holding weapons. The camp is part of President Putin’s attempts to indoctrinate even young children to be prepared for eventual military service.”

This world is indeed ruled by demons. 

Putin’s Spirits 

Express wrote on August 20: 

“Vladimir Putin allegedly consulted Mongolian shamans regarding the potential deployment of nuclear weapons, according to Russian sources. The Russian leader has long been recognised for his ‘special attitude to mysticism’ throughout the years, with speculation emerging in 2018 that he bathed in Siberian red deer blood to enhance his vitality. Nevertheless, during his trip to Mongolia in early September this year, it’s alleged that Putin advanced his mystical convictions even further, reports the Daily Star… Mikhail Zygar, founder of the prohibited opposition channel TV Dozhd, indicated that Putin possesses a strong fascination with ‘pagan traditions.’ 

“In a piece for the German news website Der Spiegel, Zygar penned: ‘Mongolia and Tuva are considered the home of the most powerful shamans in the world. Vladimir Putin has long been known for his special attitude towards mysticism. And he apparently combines his interest in Orthodox mysticism with pagan traditions.’ 

“Mongolia maintains membership of the International Criminal Court, which issued an arrest warrant for Putin last year following his deportation of Ukrainian children. Despite the warrant, Mongolian authorities failed to apprehend Putin during his visit, citing their substantial dependence on Russia as justification for their inaction. 

“Zygar proposed that Putin was prepared to risk detention to seek counsel from the spirits. The Kremlin has rejected recent claims put forward by an opposition figure, declaring: ‘The mentioned circumstances related to the Russian President’s visit to Mongolia in September 2024 have no connection to reality.’ This marks not Putin’s initial venture into mysticism – he allegedly consulted spiritual advisers before his 2012 invasion of Ukraine.   

“According to a report last year, Russian state media asserted that the nation’s ‘supreme shaman’ Kara-ool Dopchun-ool had called upon ‘the sun, the moon and the stars’ to safeguard Kremlin forces in Ukraine, all at Putin’s request.” 

This would explain Putin’s insane and demonic conduct towards Ukraine.

Deportation of Garcia Paused 

The New York Post wrote on August 25: 

“A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s effort to deport alleged MS-13 gangbanger Kilmar Abrego Garcia to Uganda. US District Judge Paula Xinis, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, paused the deportation plan until the Trump administration allows Abrego Garcia the opportunity to contest his removal… 

“‘Today, ICE law enforcement arrested Kilmar Abrego Garcia and are processing him for deportation,’ Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said. ‘President Trump is not going to allow this illegal alien, who is an MS-13 gang member, human trafficker, serial domestic abuser, and child predator to terrorize American citizens any longer.’” 

By way of background, Garcia (29), a Salvadorian citizen and Maryland resident, is married to an American citizen. They have 3 children together, who are all American citizens. He entered the USA illegally in 2011. In 2019, an immigration judge granted him withholding of removal status due to the danger he would face from gang violence if he returned to El Salvador. This status allowed him to live and work legally in the US. He was illegally transported to a notorious prison in El Salvador. The United States Supreme Court found that he needed to be returned to the USA.

He was returned, but was charged immediately with human smuggling following a 2022 traffic stop in Tennessee for speeding. He had nine passengers in the car and officers allegedly discussed their suspicions of smuggling before allowing him to go with just a warning. He was detained by ICE this week when he showed up in immigration court for an scheduled interview. No charges were ever filed against him for being a child predator or a MS-13 gang member. The allegation that he lives illegally in the USA is at least questionable. So is the allegation that he is a “serial domestic abuser.” His wife filed for protective orders against him in 2020 and 2021, though she has since made conflicting public statements regarding the allegations. He was never convicted of any crime.

Politifact wrote on August 25, in fact-checking the U.S. government’s allegations: “Some of these statements are exaggerated, and others are based on information from dubious informants.” 

EU Postal Services Suspends Shipment of Packages to the USA 

Breitbart wrote on August 23: 

“Multiple postal services around Europe announced Saturday that they are suspending the shipment of many packages to the United States amid a lack of clarity over new import duties. Postal services in Germany, Denmark, Sweden and Italy said they will stop shipping most merchandise to the U.S. effective immediately. France and Austria will follow Monday, and the United Kingdom Tuesday. 

“Under a decree signed by President Donald Trump last month, international goods that were previously exempt from U.S. tariffs – those valued under $800 – will be subject to import duties from Aug. 29. Letters, books, gifts and small parcels worth less than $100 will continue to be exempt.

“A trade framework agreed by the U.S. and the European Union last month set a 15% tariff on the vast majority of products shipped from the EU. Many European postal services say they are pausing deliveries now because they cannot guarantee the goods will enter the U.S. before Aug. 29. They cite ambiguity about what kind of goods are covered by the new rules, and the lack of time to process their implications.

“Starting Saturday, Deutsche Post and DHL Parcel Germany said they ‘will no longer be able to accept and transport parcels and postal items containing goods from business customers destined for the US.’ Postnord, the Nordic logistics company, and Italy’s postal service announced similar suspensions effective Saturday… In the Netherlands, PostNL spokesperson Wout Witteveen said the Trump administration is pressing ahead with the new duties despite U.S. authorities lacking a system to collect them… 

Austrian Post, Austria’s leading logistics and postal service provider, stated that the last acceptance of commercial shipments to the U.S., including Puerto Rico, will take place Tuesday. France’s national postal service, La Poste, said the U.S. did not provide full details or allow enough time for the French postal service to prepare for new customs procedures… The UK’s Royal Mail said it would halt U.S. shipments on Tuesday ‘to allow time for those packages to arrive before duties kick in.’ Items originating in the U.K. will require a 10% duty for items over $100, it said. PostEurop, an association of 51 European public postal operators, said that if no solution can be found by Aug. 29 all its members will likely follow suit.”

Money Watch added on August 23:

India’s government also said the country will temporarily suspend postal deliveries to the United States starting Monday, except letters, documents and gift items of up to $100 in value… India’s communications ministry said in a statement that the executive order issued last month requires transport carriers or other ‘qualified parties’ approved by US authorities to collect and remit the tariff duties, but ‘several critical processes relating to the designation of “qualified parties” and mechanisms for duty collection and remittance remain undefined.’”

This is the kind of damage and uproar Trump’s ridiculous tariff policy creates. 

US-India Relationship Sours 

Express wrote on August 26: 

“Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has rejected four phone calls from US President Donald Trump as the countries’ relations sour, a German newspaper reported. The report in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (F.A.Z.) claimed that Modi remained frustrated and cautious about engaging in dialogue due to mounting pressure over tariffs. The US threatened India with a 25% tariff on exports to the US due to its purchases of Russian oil, on top of a 25% tariff due to a trade imbalance, meaning the country is facing a steep 50% duty in total on major industries like textiles, gems and jewellery, auto parts, and seafood. 

“Modi is reportedly maintaining his stance on continuing to buy Russian oil, which has been claimed to be financing ‘Putin’s war machine’, and resisting Trump’s pressure to open India’s markets to US agribusiness. The new rate [came into effect on] August 27, according to the executive order. A response from India’s foreign ministry on Wednesday August 6 said Delhi had already made clear its stance on imports from Russia, and deemed the tariff ‘unfair, unjustified and unreasonable’. 

“Analyst Mark Frazier said the American concept of an Indo-Pacific alignment—in which India plays a central role in containing China—’is falling apart’, according to the F.A.Z. report.” 

Of course it does. India will become part of the prophesied kings of the East under Russian-Chinese leadership. 

Coming… A Universal Vaccine? 

npr wrote on August 5: 

“The Department of Health and Human Services will cancel contracts and pull funding for some vaccines that are being developed to fight respiratory viruses like COVID-19 and the flu. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced in a statement Tuesday that 22 projects, totaling $500 million, to develop vaccines using mRNA technology will be halted. 

“Kennedy’s decision to terminate the projects is the latest in a string of decisions that have put the longtime vaccine critic’s doubts about shots into full effect at the nation’s health department. Kennedy has pulled back recommendations around the COVID-19 shots, fired the panel that makes vaccine recommendations, and refused to offer a vigorous endorsement of vaccinations as a measles outbreak worsened. 

“The health secretary criticized mRNA vaccines in a video on his social media accounts, explaining the decision to cancel projects being led by the nation’s leading pharmaceutical companies, including Pfizer and Moderna, that offer protection against viruses like the flu, COVID-19 and H5N1. ‘To replace the troubled mRNA programs, we’re prioritizing the development of safer, broader vaccine strategies, like whole-virus vaccines and novel platforms that don’t collapse when viruses mutate,’ Kennedy said in the video… Kennedy said work is underway on an alternative.

He said a ‘universal vaccine’ that mimics ‘natural immunity’ is the administration’s focus. ‘It could be effective — we believe it’s going to be effective — against not only coronaviruses, but also flu,’ he said.” 

So, replacing certain vaccines with another “universal vaccine” is the solution? 

“Army Base Used for WWII Japanese Internment Will Be Nation’s Largest ICE Detention Center” 

USA Today wrote on August 24: 

“Americans of Japanese heritage say they hear echoes of their families’ forced internment in the Trump administration’s newest immigrant detention site… erecting the nation’s largest immigrant detention site on Fort Bliss in El Paso, Texas.

“Eighty years ago,  Fort Bliss housed dozens of [American] people [of Japanese heritage] labeled ‘alien enemies’ by the government in a detention camp that included two compounds surrounded by double barbed wire fences… Smaller numbers of immigrants from Germany and Italy were also sent there after the United States joined European Allies and declared war against those countries. At least 113 first-generation Japanese Americans were shipped to the base before being sent to other holding areas across the country… 

“The people detained at Bliss… [were] the first in the eventual internment of over 125,000 Japanese Americans across the country, most of them U.S. citizens. For the vast majority, there were no accounts of wrongdoing other than being seen as ‘enemy aliens’ …. After Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor, the American government viewed Japanese immigrants and Japanese Americans as potential traitors… President Franklin Delano Roosevelt immediately invoked the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to detain people and confiscate their property.” 

Terrible. And it’s all repeating itself. 

Coming… Mass Deportations in the UK? 

Newsmax wrote on August 23: 

“Former Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage set out plans on Saturday for ‘mass deportations’ of migrants who have crossed the English Channel on small boats if his Reform UK party forms Britain’s next government… Farage said he would withdraw Britain from the European Convention on Human Rights and sign deals with Afghanistan, Eritrea, and other top countries of origin to repatriate illegal migrants… 

“Asked if he was concerned that asylum seekers would be killed or tortured if they were sent to countries with poor human rights records, Farage said he was more worried about the threat he believed asylum seekers posed to Britons. ‘I can’t be responsible for despotic regimes all over the world. But I can be responsible for the safety of women and girls on our streets,’ he said… 

“Broader opinion polls show that immigration and asylum are the public’s greatest concern, just ahead of the economy… 

“Last year 37,000 people — mostly from Afghanistan, Syria, Iran, Vietnam, and Eritrea — arrived in Britain from France by crossing the English Channel in small boats. The total was up by a quarter from 2023 and accounted for 9% of net migration. About two-thirds of people who arrive via small boats and claim asylum are successful and only 3% have been deported… 

“Farage told The Times he would end the right to claim asylum or to challenge deportation for those who arrived by small boats by replacing existing human rights legislation and opting Britain out of refugee treaties, citing a national emergency… The Times said Farage wanted to create holding facilities for 24,000 migrants on air bases at a cost of $3.4 billion and operate five deportation flights a day with total deportations reaching the hundreds of thousands. If that failed, asylum seekers could be held on Ascension Island, a British territory in the South Atlantic, to send a symbolic message, Farage said.” 

Politico added on August 23: 

“… the far-right politician, whose party currently leads consistently in the polls, said migrants coming to Britain by small boats should be arrested on arrival, detained in Royal Air Force bases, denied the right to asylum, and deported within 30 days…” 

Sky News added on August 23: 

“Only last autumn the Reform leader repeatedly shied away from the concept of ‘mass deportations’, describing the idea as ‘a political impossibility.’ But now he’s embraced Trump-style immigration rhetoric. 

“It’s not surprising that Reform want to capitalise on the outpouring of public anger over the use of hotels to house asylum seekers. The policy was started by the previous Conservative government, in response to housing shortages – and Labour has failed to make significant progress on its promise to stop it. But all the major parties have shifted firmly to the right on this issue. 

“There’s been very little political criticism of the aggressiveness of Farage’s policy suggestions, and the premise that the UK should no longer offer sanctuary to anyone who arrives here illegally…. current efforts to end the use of asylum hotels by 2029 are clearly not working. That’s a credibility gap Farage is more than ready to exploit.” 

Adopting Trump’s controversial approach to immigration is most certainly not an act to follow. 

UK Economy Heading for Collapse 

Express wrote on August 25: 

“They’re under the misapprehension that they can keep raising taxes without consequences – and have another £50 billion in store for us in autumn. Everyone else in the country knows the reality that if you push taxes too high some businesses go bust, others go abroad, and some move to the black market where they operate a cash-in-hand system to bypass handing over their hard-earned money to the Treasury… 

“It is so apparent those in government have never run anything commercially… What a bunch of clueless [politicians] we have in charge – they are not so much running the country as running the country into the ground…” 

Mystery of Bermuda Triangle Solved? 

Daily Mail wrote on August 25: 

“Dr Simon Boxall, an oceanographer from the University of Southampton,… says that the Bermuda Triangle’s record of disappearances is due to ‘rogue waves’… Towering up to 100 feet (30 metres) in the air, rogue waves are abnormally steep and can hit unexpectedly from directions other than the prevailing wind. According to Dr Boxall, a large ship trapped by one of these killer swells could ‘sink in a matter of two or three minutes’… 

“Theories surrounding the deadly pull of the Bermuda Triangle have spread widely ever since the disappearance of the USS Cyclops in 1918… Despite an extensive search, no trace of the 542-foot (165-metre) vessel or its 306 crew members has ever been found…” 

From all the “explanations,” this one seems to be one of the least convincing. It does not even address the disappearance of airplanes. At least 50 ships disappeared, as well as at least 20 airplanes, which never left any trace of a wreckage or survivors. But “scientists” who deny the existence of the “supernatural,” do not even consider that Satan and his demons might be behind many of these occurrences. However, the Church of God has been considering this possibility for over 60 years. 

No Two-State Solution 

Israel 365 News wrote on August 22: 

“US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee has firmly stated that establishing a Palestinian state is not a priority for the Trump administration, suggesting that Israel’s Arab neighbors could instead provide territory for such a state… effectively ruling out the establishment of such a state in the occupied West Bank… Huckabee went further, suggesting that no Palestinian state is likely ‘in our lifetime’, marking a significant departure from decades of US policy supporting a two-state solution… 

“‘One of the reasons we’re seeing the more aggressive decision [by Israel] to move into some of these areas is because it’s in reaction to what the Europeans have done — in concert with the Palestinian Authority — pushing for a unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state,’ Huckabee said. He added that these actions have had ‘a totally disastrous effect’ on stability in Judea and Samaria and on efforts to resolve the situation in Gaza…. ‘Pushing for unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state without the cooperation and participation of Israel is a violation of Oslo,’ Huckabee said… 

“Huckabee has long been a vocal supporter of Israeli settlement expansion in what he refers to as Judea and Samaria, the biblical names for the West Bank. The former Arkansas governor has previously argued that ‘there’s really no such thing as a Palestinian’ and has stated there is ‘no such place as the West Bank’… 

“The push for Palestinian recognition has gained momentum globally, particularly following Israel’s military operations in Gaza. The State of Palestine is recognised by 146 countries around the world… In the spring of 2024, more European and Caribbean nations recognized a Palestinian state, including Barbados, Ireland, Jamaica, Norway and Spain, while Slovenia also joined this group. Looking ahead, France, Malta, and Australia have announced plans to recognize Palestine as a state in September 2025 at the 2025 United Nations General Assembly, with Canada and the United Kingdom stating they will as well subject to certain conditions. In 2014, Sweden became the first country in Western Europe to recognise Palestine, setting a precedent that others have followed…”

Australia Expels Iran’s Ambassador Over Antisemitism 

JTA wrote on August 26: 

“Australia expelled Iran’s ambassador on Tuesday, accusing Tehran of orchestrating antisemitic arson attacks on Jewish institutions, as police in Melbourne announced a series of arrests tied to synagogue fires and vandalism that have rattled the country’s Jewish community. 

“Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the Iranian-directed attacks were ‘extraordinary and dangerous acts of aggression’ designed to destabilize Australia. The government will also designate Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organization and suspend operations at its embassy in Tehran. It has already moved Australian diplomats to a third country… 

“The Australian response appears to be the most extensive. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the expulsion of Ambassador Ahmad Sadeghi and three other Iranian officials was the first time Australia has taken such a step since World War II.” 

Increasing Antisemitism in France 

ntv wrote on August 25: 

“France has summoned US Ambassador Charles Kushner for today following a letter to French President Emmanuel Macron regarding antisemitic incidents. In the letter, Kushner expressed his ‘concern about the increase in antisemitic acts in France and pointed to an alleged failure of the French authorities to combat these acts,’ the French Foreign Ministry said. ‘The allegations are unacceptable,’ it added. It regrets the increase in antisemitic incidents in France since October 7, 2023, which are a reality. The French authorities will take all necessary measures to combat them, the ministry said… 

“The US ambassador to France has joined Israel’s criticism and accused French President Emmanuel Macron of ‘inadequate’ efforts to combat anti-Semitism. In a letter to Macron, he expressed his ‘deep concern about the dramatic rise in anti-Semitism in France and your government’s inadequate response to it.’ In France, not a day goes by ‘without Jews being attacked in the streets, synagogues or schools vandalized, or Jewish businesses vandalized,’ Kushner wrote. 

“Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused the French president last week of promoting anti-Semitism with the planned recognition of a Palestinian state. Nearly 500,000 Jews live in France, making it the largest Jewish community in Europe. Since the major attack by the radical Islamist Hamas on Israel on October 7, 2023, and the resulting war in Gaza Strip, the number of anti-Semitic acts in France and other countries has risen sharply.” 

Major Step Towards Compulsory Military Service 

The Washington Post wrote on August 27: 

“Germany took a major step Wednesday toward a controversial return to compulsory military service… On Wednesday… Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s cabinet approved a plan that would reinstate a form of conscription, which has not existed in Germany since being suspended in 2011. 

“The measure — subject to parliamentary approval this fall — would not subject Germans to draft cards and lotteries. Instead, starting next year, it would require 18-year-old German men to fill out a questionnaire about their physical fitness and willingness to serve. For women, the form would be voluntary. The bill also allows compulsory military service to be reinstated in the future, with parliamentary consent. Beginning in 2027, the bill would require all 18-year-old men to undergo a physical fitness exam. These measures would save time ‘if mandatory conscription for basic military service has to be activated, because conscription data will then already be available and will not have to be collected in this situation,’ according to the draft legislation… 

“‘The Bundeswehr must grow,’ Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said… ‘The international security situation, especially Russia’s aggressive behavior, demands this.’ If compulsory conscription is reinstated, conscientious objectors would be able to avoid the military, as was permitted previously, by performing civil service such as hospital work or disaster relief, the bill states… 

“‘There will be no way around conscription,’ Markus Söder, minister-president of the state of Bavaria and head of the Christian Social Union, the Bavarian sister party to Merz’s CDU, said on German TV ahead of the cabinet vote. Merz said Wednesday that the goal was to ‘make military service more attractive and bring in more young people to serve in the Bundeswehr.’ But, he added, ‘if we determine that we need to make adjustments, we will do so.’ Even Pistorius, a Social Democrat, conceded that voluntary measures might fall short. ‘There is no guarantee that voluntary participation will be sufficient.’”

Of International Interest? 

Nius wrote on August 25: 

“AfD politician Joachim Paul addressed high-ranking US politicians (Marco Rubio and JD Vance) and entrepreneur Elon Musk in a video on the X platform. In the English-language message, he reports having been excluded from the upcoming mayoral election in Ludwigshafen. Paul calls it a ‘case of international interest’ and asks for support… 

“‘The pretext is that I met with the wrong people, I spoke to the wrong people. The real reason is: They want to stay in power at all costs, and they don’t want to change the migration policy – ​​which has led to a major crisis in Germany and especially in Ludwigshafen.’ 

Elon Musk already commented on the video: ‘Excluded from the election without having committed any crime?'” 

No Longer a Democracy? 

Focus wrote on August 25: 

“Germany calls itself a democracy, but the reality is sobering: Parties have hijacked the political system… At the same time, citizens’ trust is plummeting. According to studies by the Allensbach Institute and the Research Group on Elections, trust in parties is at historic lows. More and more people are turning away or seeking salvation in protest votes. This is no coincidence. It is the direct result of a politics that has lost touch with the people… 

“Parties control every access to power…. In the Bundestag, voting is based on party discipline, not individual conviction… We must not fool ourselves: Hardly anyone will develop the perfect solution from within… It is naive to believe that change comes from within. Anyone who reaches the executive board or even the top of a party is living proof that the system works for them. Why should someone change a system that made them great? That is the paradox: We expect reform from party leadership that costs them power… Germany doesn’t need a steward of the old, but an Innovator of the future…” 

Grenell: “Germans Sick and Tired of Weak Woke Response.” 

Brussels Signal wrote on August 25: 

“Richard Grenell, the US Presidential Envoy for Special Missions, has criticised German Chancellor Friedrich Merz over Germany’s lax response to a rise in immigrant crime. In a post on X on August 24, Grenell – who served as the US ambassador to Germany from 2018 to 2020 during Donald Trump’s first presidency – wrote: ‘Friedrich Merz must understand that the German people are sick and tired of this weak and woke response.’ 

“Grenell’s remarks came as a reaction to the stabbing of a US student on a German tram that was allegedly committed by a Syrian asylum seeker. The US student himself had posted a video from hospital shortly after the attack that showed him with a bandaged face. ‘If [allegedly criminal asylum seekers] can do this to the people of Germany and then just get released 12 hours later, where’s the law?’ he said. 

“The 21-year-old student said he had witnessed two men accosting a group of young women on a tram in Dresden (Saxony) late on the night of August 23. According to German police the US citizen intervened to help the harassed women. In reaction the two then allegedly started hitting him. A short while later one of them pulled out a knife and allegedly stabbed him in the face several times. The student was seriously… injured and rushed to the hospital with several slash wounds to his face. Photos in German newspapers showed the blood-spattered interior of the tram. 

“The alleged attackers fled but one was later apprehended. According to German newspaper Bild on August 24he… reportedly has a police record including alleged bodily harm, robbery and illegal immigration to Germany. The suspect was taken into custody but released a couple of hours later by decision of the public prosecutor’s office. Public prosecutor Jürgen Schmidt told Bild: ‘According to the assessment of the duty prosecutor, there were insufficient grounds for detention. He cannot be held responsible for the knife attack.’… Germany only allows pretrial detention as a rare exception. Reportedly, the prosecutors saw no chance of obtaining an arrest warrant from the investigating judge in this case as there was no risk of Majd A fleeing, concealing evidence or reoffending as he has a permanent place of residence…” 

Due to national and international pressure, the Dresden prosecutors seem to have awakened from their sleep. Note the next article. 

Deutsche Welle added on August 26: 

“Dresden police and prosecutors said on Tuesday that they had arrested a 21-year-old Syrian… and was put in investigative custody on suspicion of grievous bodily harm, among other offenses. 

“The man in question had already been detained once before and was released soon after the incident… Police said… that after further investigation there was now reasonable grounds to suspect that he was ‘involved in the knife attack against the 20-year-old American and also himself injured the victim with a dangerous object.’ Tuesday’s statement made no direct mention of the second suspect [who is still at large]. 

 Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

Update 1174

I Don’t Want to / The Period of Judgement

On August 30, 2025, Rene Messier will present the sermonette, titled, “I Don’t Want to” and Paul Niehoff will present the sermon, titled, “The Period of Judges.”

The live services are available, over video and audio, at http://eternalgod.org/live-services/ (12:30 pm Pacific Time; 1:30 pm Mountain Time; 2:30 pm Central Time; 3:30 pm Eastern Time; 8:30 pm Greenwich Mean Time; 9:30 pm Central European Time). Just click on Connect to Live Stream.

Back to top

The Importance of Being Thankful

by Paul Niehoff (Australia)

A long time ago, when I was in paid employment, I read an article by an instructor in leadership in one of my engineering magazines. She remembered back in her college days that the dean, over a period of several months, had invited all the students to dine with him and his wife. I will quote her words. “He had been doing this for over ten years. After my dinner, I wrote a thank you note. To my great surprise and trepidation, they asked to see me. They wanted to thank me for being the only student ever to thank them for their hospitality.”

This was one in maybe hundreds. In the days of the New Testament, when Jesus Christ healed ten lepers, only one turned back to thank God and show appreciation. In this case, it was one in ten. And that one was a foreigner (compare Luke 17:15-18).

Is thankfulness just a matter of politeness, being tactful, just a nice social custom?

I would like us to see what God says about thankfulness. How important it is to Him. Paul states this in 2 Timothy 3:1-4, “But know this that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasures rather than lovers of God…” Being unthankful is listed among many other serious shortcomings like blasphemers and slanderers.

This shows that God considers being unthankful as a serious matter. Why is this? He knows that our human nature is selfish, trying to get for oneself. With this nature, it is hard to be thankful.

To be thankful, we must stop, look at, and appreciate what we have. But instead of appreciation, human nature generally lusts for more and more. A mind filled with this desire to get more is virtually incapable of gratitude.

God states this clearly in Romans 1:21-22. “… because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools…” It takes humility to be thankful. Human nature, with its greed, selfishness and vanity cannot humble itself in thanksgiving to God.

In Psalm 100:4, we read: “Enter into His gates with thanksgiving, And into His courts with praise. Be thankful to Him, and bless His name.” In some of the hymns we sing, based on the Psalms, they begin with “O Give Thanks.” Why?

God wants to develop holy, righteous, perfect character in those who have voluntarily yielded their lives to Him. God knows human nature. He knows it is filled with, as Mr. Armstrong used to say frequently, vanity, selfishness, lust and greed. God knows that of itself, human nature is not thankful.

Therefore, to help us overcome this selfish nature, God has commanded that we be thankful. Thankfulness gets our minds off self. It acknowledges God’s hand in our lives. We admit we’ve had help. We did not do it all ourselves.

It can be very difficult for people to say thank you. But God tells us, in 1 Thessalonians 5:18: “… in everything give thanks; for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus for you.”

So this is the formula for happiness. God expects us to give thanks in everything. In other words, God expects us to find something good in every situation. God wants us to focus on our blessings, not dwell on our problems. In fact, there is a command in Ephesians 5:20, “… giving thanks always for all things to God the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.”

There are many things to be thankful for, and I will not mention them here, but being human, we like to think normally that we are sufficient unto ourselves, that we have worked hard to get all we have. Yet when we give God thanks, or even thank other people, we are acknowledging that God and others have helped us and provided for us and that we are not self-sufficient. We are not the big I.

King David understood the need for thanksgiving. He even set up certain of the Levites to thank and praise the Eternal God of Israel. Every morning and every evening also, these Levites were to thank and praise the Eternal. David knew how easy it is to become ungrateful, and this was one of the greatest sins a nation could fall into, so for an example, these Levites formally offered thanks to God twice a day (compare 1 Chronicles 23:30).

In a number of places God says He is not really pleased with the sacrifices the people offered in the Old Testament and the way they were offered, but in the book of Psalms, thanksgiving is called an offering and a sacrifice. God is very pleased with this offering (compare Psalms 116:17).

God knows it goes against the grain of human nature to say thank you. But to say it sincerely shows a person to be humble, meek and thoughtful. Every day God wants us to give thanks for the many blessings we have in life. He also wants us to thank others.

It is recorded that Daniel was a man who gave thanks. He thanked God for giving him wisdom and revealing the secrets of the king in prophecies. He was so thankful, that even when a decree was issued that no one should make petition to any God or man other than the king for thirty days, and if he did, he was to be put to death, Daniel knelt three times a day and gave thanks (compare Daniel 6:10).  He gave thanks even under a death sentence. He was not so concerned about himself that he forgot about God’s goodness. We note later in the book of Daniel that the angel Gabriel told him that he was greatly beloved. This was because of his total character, including his thankfulness.

Would I be able to give thanks under such circumstances? Would you? And yet, God says to give thanks always in all things; so yes, we should be growing in order to be able to do this.

So is being thankful just a social custom, a matter of being nice to people? No. From what we have just read, it is obvious that God wants us to give thanks always because it pleases Him.

Back to top

by Norbert Link

Our new StandingWatch program, titled, “Demons Rule the World,”  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIeCgnf0UHE covers the terrible murder of innocent schoolchildren in Minnesota, as well as other demonically inspired incidents in Russia and the USA.

In other news, we begin with the highly “suspicious” FBI raid on the home and office of John Boltonformer national security adviser and outspoken critic of Donald Trump; continue with the dubious testimony of Ghislaine Maxwell, convicted of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking and other crimes in the Epstein case, and reactions of family members of one of the victims, Virginia Giuffre.

We address the ongoing developments in the Russia-Ukraine war; with no hope in sight to end the killing any time soon; and point out Putin’s contact with “spirits.” We also speak about Germany’s ineffective and disunited government, as well as further interesting developments in Germany.

We address a frightening escalation between the EU Postal Service and the USA, due to Trump’s ill-conceived tariffs; as well as home sales in the USA being way down.

We report on the American intention of creating a “universal” vaccine; and we speak on bad memories regarding an army base used for WWII Japanese internment, which will be the nation’s largest ICE detention center, and which is being justified with the same troublesome rationale and the application of a highly problematic law; address the possibility of mass deportations in the UK, thereby following Trump’s lead; and America’s current policy NOT to approve a two-state solution.Throughout this section, we have underlined pertinent statements in the quoted articles, for the convenience and quick overview of the reader.

Back to top

John Bolton Raid Shows Weaponization of FBI 

The Guardian wrote on August 22: 

“When Kash Patel, the FBI director, faced senators during his confirmation hearings on 30 January,  he bristled at suggestions that his 2023 book contained an ‘enemies list’. The appendix to Government Gangsters, which included a list of names of around 60 people, was simply documentation of those who had ‘weaponized’ the government, he insisted. 

“Seven months later, that denial appears increasingly hollow. Friday’s FBI search of the former national security adviser John Bolton’s home and office, reportedly to find classified documents, marks the fifth investigation targeting people from Patel’s book. Bolton now joins a growing list of Trump critics from Patel’s roll the administration has targeted with what appear to be retaliatory federal investigations… 

“Bolton’s investigation… is unprecedented in how it is calculated to target a critic…” 

Deutsche Welle added on August 22: 

“… his critics claim Patel lacks experience to lead the FBI, and point to his previous statements about going after Trump’s political enemies… Trump himself was… indicted by a Florida court for retaining classified documents at his private Mar-a-Lago beach club. That case was dropped in 2024 after Trump was elected. Patel had given interviews blasting the raids by federal agents on Trump’s residence related to the case.  

“John Bolton served as national security adviser during the first term of Donald Trump, but has since turned into an outspoken critic of the US president, often questioning the president’s mental aptitude. Since leaving the first Trump administration, Bolton has been widely critical of Trump and his policies, especially on the second administration’s handling of the war in Ukraine. During an interview with DW in June, Bolton said he believes Vladimir Putin perceives Trump as a ‘useful idiot.’ ‘He doesn’t know history, he doesn’t read briefing papers,’ Bolton said, referring to Trump.  

“In a DW interview yesterday, Bolton said Trump did not understand the situation on the ground in Ukraine, assuming that he could ‘bounce Ukraine and Russia into a peace deal in a couple of weeks and therefore get the Nobel Prize for it.’”  

In this light, the FBI’s action clearly looks like political retribution and persecution of a popular Trump critic. The FBI’s action most certainly reminds us of the FBI raid on Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate to locate “classified” information. 

More to Come? 

The Hill wrote on August 23: 

“Miles Taylor, a former Department of Homeland Security (DHS) official, signaled Saturday that he could be the next target of President Trump’s FBI… ‘Yeah, we expect it… we can… be so certain of the president’s revenge campaign to know potentially who that next target might be or one of those next targets.’

“The former DHS aide added, ‘I mean when my wife and I woke up and saw the news, she basically said to me, “It’s coming.”’… 

“The search of Bolton’s home and office marked an escalation in the feud between Trump and his former national security adviser, with critics seeing it as a potential act of retribution. Taylor, who previously suggested the president kept a ‘blacklist’ for persecution, said as much… ‘Folks don’t have to play the violin for John Bolton or Miles Taylor. Maybe they don’t like either of us. That’s fine, because it’s not about us… It’s about the criminal justice system that all Americans expect to be able to treat them fairly… It’s a president of the U.S. weaponizing the tools of his office to reshape our society. And he’s doing that. He’s making sure the scales of justice tip in his favor… There’s no telling where this could go next.’ 

“Trump told reporters at the White House on Friday that he was not told ahead of time about the raid… Vice President J.D. Vance defended the raid…, pushing back on allegations that the raid is related to retribution.” 

In fact, Trump declared that he didn’t want to know about it” (compare Fortune, dated August 23). 

JD Vance’s Comments Very Suspicious 

Raw Story wrote on August 23: 

“Hours after FBI Director gave the go-ahead to his agents to raid the home and office of John Bolton, Vice President J.D. Vance was well prepared and ready to discuss it with NBC’s Kristin Welker during an extensive interview… Vance stated, ‘We are investigating Ambassador Bolton, but if they ultimately bring a case, it will be because they determine that he has broken the law. We’re going to be careful about that… You should let the law drive these determinations, and that’s what we’re doing.’

After watching a clip of the Vance interview…, former DHS official Miles Taylor claimed Vance’s comments should set off alarms. ‘This is very, very unusual for the vice president to be this read into a criminal investigation that he should be at arm’s length from… And then… we heard that the CIA director himself might have been the one to provide the evidence to the FBI director.’ 

“‘You know, as more of these details come out, it’s starting to look completely unprecedented that all of these very top senior officials that work under Donald Trump, that know he wants to get revenge against John Bolton, are personally involved in the investigation of John Bolton,’ he added. ‘I mean, the vice president’s attestation that this had nothing to do with revenge was about as believable as what… the administration has said on the Epstein files, because it would be a truly extraordinary coincidence that they’ve decided to focus their investigative powers on a man that Donald Trump has wanted investigated for years.’” 

It does not pass the smell test for sure. And Trump did not know anything about this, while Vance knew all about it? 

Right-Wing Media Skeptical of FBI Raid 

The Independent wrote on August 24: 

“The investigation has sparked criticism from usually reliably supportive right-wing media outlets. On Friday, panelists appearing on Fox News’ America’s Newsroom said they were ‘skeptical’ of the FBI’s decision to execute the raid. 

Chris Swecker, former assistant FBI director from 2004 to 2006, said that he had consulted with former agency colleagues about the raid. ‘We’re looking at this a little bit skeptically because we were very heavily critical of the Mar-a-Lago raid. Just because you have the authority and discretion to do something like this, doesn’t mean you should,’ he told Fox News… 

“Attorney and Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley alluded to the ‘longstanding disagreement’ between Trump and Bolton. ‘There is a great concern about whether this is retaliation against a political opponent,’ he said… 

“Other conservative media warned that the raid could signal Trump is using the FBI to exact political retribution.  

“The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board said the raid reeks of political vengeance… Trump may hope that the raid leads Bolton to stop criticizing him publicly, the board suggested, adding that ‘the real offender here is a president who seems to think he can use the powers of his office to run vendettas’… the board… [characterized] the recent FBI raid…   a ‘vendetta campaign.’ The newspaper’s editorial board described [it] as ‘hard to see … as anything other than vindictive’… the board asserted that ‘it is increasingly clear that vengeance is a large part, maybe the largest part of how [Trump] will define success in his second term.’… The editorial board also noted the immediate termination of Bolton’s protective security detail upon Trump’s return to the White House, despite threats to his life connected to actions against Iran. ‘This is the kind of gratuitous viciousness that has increasingly defined Mr. Trump’s return to office,’ the board wrote… 

“The WSJ’s editorial board had previously warned about Trump and his allies pursuing political revenge, including in December 2024, weeks before his inauguration. ‘We said this was one of the risks of a second Trump term, and it’s turning out to be worse than we imagined,’ the board wrote.”

The whole matter is also suspicious for the simple reason that a highly publicized blowup occurred between Attorney General Pam Bondi (supported by Trump) and FBI Director Kath Patel and his deputy, Dan Bongino, in the screwed-up Epstein matter, with Bongino threatening to quit. Is the FBI perhaps trying to regain Trump’s favor? 

Maxwell’s Fairy Tales 

The Independent wrote on August 23: 

“Skepticism abounds following the release of transcripts and recordings of Ghislaine Maxwell’s testimony to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. Four years after her conviction and sentencing on charges of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking and other crimes, how credible is her testimony? 

“Ranking House Oversight Committee Democrat Rep. Robert Garcia was especially damning in the hours after the interview transcripts were released Friday, writing on X: ‘Ghislaine Maxwell is a convicted sex trafficker and known liar. Her interview with Trump’s DOJ lawyer shows she’s desperate for a pardon. She claims no involvement in wrongdoing, which is insulting to the girls and young women she victimized and trafficked. She cannot be trusted.’… 

“Having been convicted of federal crimes, her only likely hope for getting out of prison early is either a pardon or a commutation from the president… In addition to her flattering portrayal of Trump, Maxwell also denied the existence of the infamous Epstein client list…. On Fox News, prime time host Jesse Watters… reminded viewers of the existence of a trove of… potential evidence: ‘The list doesn’t exist? So, flight manifests don’t exist? The surveillance tapes don’t exist? The bank records don’t exist?’ 

“Attorney and legal scholar Jonathan Turley joined Watters to share his thoughts… ‘She clearly also does want something from Trump; she wants a commutation… she is clearly angling for it.’…”

Maxwell also said that the famous picture with Prince Andrew and the underaged girl Virginia Giuffre was a fake, and that even though she does not believe that Epstein killed himself, he was not murdered because of fear that he could produce some discriminatory evidence against famous people, or blackmail them. 

So, now we are also to believe that elephants can fly? 

Virginia Giuffre’s Family Outraged 

NBC News wrote on August 23: 

“The family members of a prominent survivor of Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse said they were ‘outraged’ by the Justice Department’s decision to release transcripts from Ghislaine Maxwell’s testimony last month to a federal prosecutor, arguing it provided Maxwell a ‘platform to rewrite history.’ ‘The content of these transcripts is in direct contradiction with felon Ghislaine Maxwell’s conviction for child sex trafficking,’ the family of Virginia Roberts Giuffre said in a statement. The family added, ‘This travesty of justice entirely invalidates the experiences of the many brave survivors who put their safety, security, and lives on the line to ensure her conviction, including our sister.’ 

“During the interview last month…, Maxwell said Giuffre’s allegation against Andrew ‘doesn’t hold water,’ and disputed key facts in the case, including an alleged photo of Giuffre with Andrew… Giuffre’s family accused the deputy attorney general of not sufficiently challenging Maxwell’s assertions during her testimony, suggesting that by publicly releasing the interview, the Justice Department provided Maxwell the opportunity to dispute her case in the court of public opinion… 

“Giuffre’s family also condemned the Justice Department’s decision to transfer Maxwell to a minimum-security prison following her meeting with Blanche. ‘By moving convicted felon Maxwell to a minimum-security, country club prison, the DOJ sends a disturbing message that child sex trafficking is acceptable and will be rewarded,’ the family said Saturday in a statement.” 

It was also reported by the Miami Herald, dated August 23, that only 3% of the Jeffrey Epstein files turned over so far to a House committee this week, in response to a congressional subpoena, contained new information, and less than 1% of all the files, estimated to be around 100,000 pages, not in the public domain, have been released to the public. 

The Justice Department’s conduct in this entire matter is more than questionable. Trump’s statements are not helpful either, calling “the whole Epstein thing… a Democratic hoax.” Really? Tell that to the family of Virginia Giuffre and the many hundreds, if not thousands, of underaged victims. 

To Send or Not to Send? 

Deutsche Welle wrote on August 23: 

“Politicians have been arguing about whether Germany might send soldiers [to Ukraine] for a possible peacekeeping force… Many have said Germany could hardly be absent from such a force… in Germany, it seems clear that it will not be easy for Merz to obtain approval for such a force… 51%… were opposed to a German participation in a peace mission in Ukraine. Only 36% said they thought it would be the right thing to do… 

“… politicians from all political parties have been speaking out daily on the idea of deploying troops to Ukraine. Most of them are skeptical or flat-out opposed. Almost all of them point out that any decision on this matter is still a long way off. Politicians from eastern Germany are especially opposed to the plan… AfD leader Alice Weidel warned that Germany could itself become a target and demanded: ‘Germany needs reconciliation with Russia instead of constant confrontation.’ 

“Meanwhile, Wolfgang Ischinger, the long-standing head of the Munich Security Conference, wrote on X: ‘There is not a single indication that President Putin is prepared to end this war at the moment.’ Many observers in Germany agree.” 

The German government’s two coalition parties are hopelessly divided on about EVERY major issue. As Bild Online commented on August 23: 

“The CDU/CSU and SPD are emerging from the summer recess even more divided than when they entered it… There’s hardly a significant issue on which the coalition partners agree… Moreover, a deep mutual distrust has eaten into the coalition… After the three disastrous years of the traffic light coalition, Germany cannot afford another phase of standstill… this autumn will decide the future of the government—and of Germany.” 

Trump Very Angry With Ukraine 

Newsweek wrote on August 22: 

“President Donald Trump has expressed his anger at recent Ukrainian attacks that disabled the Russian oil pipeline Druzhba, which supplies Hungary and Slovakia, both NATO allies… ongoing attacks by both sides have frustrated the self-styled peacemaker Trump as he seeks to bring about an end to a war that has cost hundreds of thousands of lives and destroyed parts of Ukraine since Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022. 

“Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban shared a handwritten note from his political ally, Trump, in a private Facebook group for his supporters… Hungary has sought to stay out of the Russia-Ukraine war and maintain relations with the Russian government… It opposes Ukraine’s ambition to join the EU. The country has accused Brussels and Kyiv of seeking to drag it into the war. 

“Orban had written to Trump to complain about the attacks on Druzhba and the impact on Hungarian energy. Ukraine said the pipeline also supplies the invading Russian armed forces, which is why it was targeted. ‘Viktor—I do not like hearing this,’ Trump… wrote in the note. ‘I am very angry about it. Tell Slovakia. You are my great friend.’… 

“In the statement to which Trump had replied, Orban noted that Ukrainian strikes on Druzhba had happened days before the ‘historic meeting’ in Alaska between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Ukraine has since struck the pipeline again. ‘This pipeline supplies Hungary and Slovakia, two countries that have no other means of importing crude oil,’ Orban had said. ‘Hungary supports Ukraine with electricity and petrol, in return they bomb [a] pipeline that [supplies] us…’” 

Two More Weeks? 

The Sun wrote on August 23: 

“Donald Trump has announced that he will give Vladimir Putin a couple of weeks to set up a peace meeting with rival Volodymyr Zelensky… Trump said that there’s a ‘tremendous amount of hatred’ that he’s trying to navigate through as he fights for a ceasefire… 

“Kaja Kallas, the EU’s top diplomat, warned on Friday that Putin is laying a trap for the West by demanding to keep hold of Ukrainian land…. Trump has backed the need for ‘swapping of territories’ in peace negotiations – raising fears he could be strolling straight into this trap.” 

The Hill added on August 22: 

“One aspect of the deal that remains a sticking point is security guarantees. A possibility would be that Ukraine joins the European Union instead of joining NATO. On the recommendations of European leaders, Trump called Orban on Monday to attempt to sway his vote in order to let Ukraine join the EU’s 27 member states.  

“Orbán posted on Facebook that Ukraine’s accession to the EU ‘does not provide any security guarantees,’ therefore, ‘linking membership with security guarantees is unnecessary and dangerous.’” 

No Meeting Anytime Soon 

The New York Post wrote on August 24: 

“Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov threw up yet another roadblock Sunday to direct talks between his leader, Vladimir Putin, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky — suggesting that a summit is still far off… Lavrov said Sunday that Russia has an ‘agenda’ in mind that must to be agreed before the two sides can sit down together. ‘There is no meeting planned,’ Lavrov told [NBC].

“The summit to end the war will only happen if it has a ‘presidential agenda’ that pleases Russian President Vladimir Putin, he said — but that agenda is ‘not ready at all.’”

So why wait two more weeks? 

Ceasefire an Easy Fix? 

The Ron Paul Institute wrote on August 25: 

“Clearly no one in the world with a heart would like to see the fighting go on. So at first glance a ceasefire seems like a quick fix… Earlier in Ukraine hostilities both Germany and France achieved Putin’s agreement to a ceasefire while a negotiated peace agreement was underway. The efforts were called the Minsk Accords… 

“Certainly [Friedrich] Merz [Germany’s Chancellor] must know the background of this. He would be remiss not to understand that a ceasefire without a peace agreement might be as unattainable as the end of a rainbow.” 

Russia Threatens to March on Paris 

Express wrote on August 26: 

“Russia has issued a terrifying warning to France as tensions between the two countries threaten to explode. The French President is the latest Western leader to be singled out for rough treatment by Kremlin propagandists and to become ‘public enemy number one’… During an interview with the French TV news network LCI, Emmanuel Macron called Putin ‘a predator and an ogre at our doorstep.’ The remarks seemingly went down like a lead balloon with the sensitive Kremlin tyrant, who unleashed his propaganda hounds on the unfortunate Macron. Vladimir Solovyov has relished his role as the Putin regime’s top attack dog… 

“Once again referencing deep Russian grievances about Nato expansion, the Kremlin stooge said [on his TV show]: ‘Originally, back in December 2021, we stated that NATO moving closer to our borders was unacceptable… And now they’re saying: “We’ll be at your borders, we’ll send Nato troops there. That’s why we’ll be on Champs-Elysées. And Macron will be polishing the boots of a Russian officer.’… The last time Russian soldiers graced Paris with their presence was in the aftermath of the Napoleonic wars in the 19th century. Russian forces, along with other Coalition allies, reached and entered the French capital on March 31, 1814.” 

Russian Children Taught to Murder 

The New York Post wrote on August 27: 

“Baby-faced Russian children as young as 8 have been taught how to throw hand grenades and carry rifles at a bizarre summer camp designed to train up the next generation of Putin’s military. The twisted exercises, supervised by soldiers who have fought in Russia’s war in Ukraine, saw young children given real rifles or convincing replicas at a camp in the Rostov region, close to the Ukrainian border…

“Some 83 children — ages 8-17 — took part in last week’s activities, including a ‘route march’ along the River Don involving running and crawling on their bellies across sand and shallow water while holding weapons. The camp is part of President Putin’s attempts to indoctrinate even young children to be prepared for eventual military service.”

This world is indeed ruled by demons. 

Putin’s Spirits 

Express wrote on August 20: 

“Vladimir Putin allegedly consulted Mongolian shamans regarding the potential deployment of nuclear weapons, according to Russian sources. The Russian leader has long been recognised for his ‘special attitude to mysticism’ throughout the years, with speculation emerging in 2018 that he bathed in Siberian red deer blood to enhance his vitality. Nevertheless, during his trip to Mongolia in early September this year, it’s alleged that Putin advanced his mystical convictions even further, reports the Daily Star… Mikhail Zygar, founder of the prohibited opposition channel TV Dozhd, indicated that Putin possesses a strong fascination with ‘pagan traditions.’ 

“In a piece for the German news website Der Spiegel, Zygar penned: ‘Mongolia and Tuva are considered the home of the most powerful shamans in the world. Vladimir Putin has long been known for his special attitude towards mysticism. And he apparently combines his interest in Orthodox mysticism with pagan traditions.’ 

“Mongolia maintains membership of the International Criminal Court, which issued an arrest warrant for Putin last year following his deportation of Ukrainian children. Despite the warrant, Mongolian authorities failed to apprehend Putin during his visit, citing their substantial dependence on Russia as justification for their inaction. 

“Zygar proposed that Putin was prepared to risk detention to seek counsel from the spirits. The Kremlin has rejected recent claims put forward by an opposition figure, declaring: ‘The mentioned circumstances related to the Russian President’s visit to Mongolia in September 2024 have no connection to reality.’ This marks not Putin’s initial venture into mysticism – he allegedly consulted spiritual advisers before his 2012 invasion of Ukraine.   

“According to a report last year, Russian state media asserted that the nation’s ‘supreme shaman’ Kara-ool Dopchun-ool had called upon ‘the sun, the moon and the stars’ to safeguard Kremlin forces in Ukraine, all at Putin’s request.” 

This would explain Putin’s insane and demonic conduct towards Ukraine.

Deportation of Garcia Paused 

The New York Post wrote on August 25: 

“A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s effort to deport alleged MS-13 gangbanger Kilmar Abrego Garcia to Uganda. US District Judge Paula Xinis, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, paused the deportation plan until the Trump administration allows Abrego Garcia the opportunity to contest his removal… 

“‘Today, ICE law enforcement arrested Kilmar Abrego Garcia and are processing him for deportation,’ Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said. ‘President Trump is not going to allow this illegal alien, who is an MS-13 gang member, human trafficker, serial domestic abuser, and child predator to terrorize American citizens any longer.’” 

By way of background, Garcia (29), a Salvadorian citizen and Maryland resident, is married to an American citizen. They have 3 children together, who are all American citizens. He entered the USA illegally in 2011. In 2019, an immigration judge granted him withholding of removal status due to the danger he would face from gang violence if he returned to El Salvador. This status allowed him to live and work legally in the US. He was illegally transported to a notorious prison in El Salvador. The United States Supreme Court found that he needed to be returned to the USA.

He was returned, but was charged immediately with human smuggling following a 2022 traffic stop in Tennessee for speeding. He had nine passengers in the car and officers allegedly discussed their suspicions of smuggling before allowing him to go with just a warning. He was detained by ICE this week when he showed up in immigration court for an scheduled interview. No charges were ever filed against him for being a child predator or a MS-13 gang member. The allegation that he lives illegally in the USA is at least questionable. So is the allegation that he is a “serial domestic abuser.” His wife filed for protective orders against him in 2020 and 2021, though she has since made conflicting public statements regarding the allegations. He was never convicted of any crime.

Politifact wrote on August 25, in fact-checking the U.S. government’s allegations: “Some of these statements are exaggerated, and others are based on information from dubious informants.” 

EU Postal Services Suspends Shipment of Packages to the USA 

Breitbart wrote on August 23: 

“Multiple postal services around Europe announced Saturday that they are suspending the shipment of many packages to the United States amid a lack of clarity over new import duties. Postal services in Germany, Denmark, Sweden and Italy said they will stop shipping most merchandise to the U.S. effective immediately. France and Austria will follow Monday, and the United Kingdom Tuesday. 

“Under a decree signed by President Donald Trump last month, international goods that were previously exempt from U.S. tariffs – those valued under $800 – will be subject to import duties from Aug. 29. Letters, books, gifts and small parcels worth less than $100 will continue to be exempt.

“A trade framework agreed by the U.S. and the European Union last month set a 15% tariff on the vast majority of products shipped from the EU. Many European postal services say they are pausing deliveries now because they cannot guarantee the goods will enter the U.S. before Aug. 29. They cite ambiguity about what kind of goods are covered by the new rules, and the lack of time to process their implications.

“Starting Saturday, Deutsche Post and DHL Parcel Germany said they ‘will no longer be able to accept and transport parcels and postal items containing goods from business customers destined for the US.’ Postnord, the Nordic logistics company, and Italy’s postal service announced similar suspensions effective Saturday… In the Netherlands, PostNL spokesperson Wout Witteveen said the Trump administration is pressing ahead with the new duties despite U.S. authorities lacking a system to collect them… 

Austrian Post, Austria’s leading logistics and postal service provider, stated that the last acceptance of commercial shipments to the U.S., including Puerto Rico, will take place Tuesday. France’s national postal service, La Poste, said the U.S. did not provide full details or allow enough time for the French postal service to prepare for new customs procedures… The UK’s Royal Mail said it would halt U.S. shipments on Tuesday ‘to allow time for those packages to arrive before duties kick in.’ Items originating in the U.K. will require a 10% duty for items over $100, it said. PostEurop, an association of 51 European public postal operators, said that if no solution can be found by Aug. 29 all its members will likely follow suit.”

Money Watch added on August 23:

India’s government also said the country will temporarily suspend postal deliveries to the United States starting Monday, except letters, documents and gift items of up to $100 in value… India’s communications ministry said in a statement that the executive order issued last month requires transport carriers or other ‘qualified parties’ approved by US authorities to collect and remit the tariff duties, but ‘several critical processes relating to the designation of “qualified parties” and mechanisms for duty collection and remittance remain undefined.’”

This is the kind of damage and uproar Trump’s ridiculous tariff policy creates. 

US-India Relationship Sours 

Express wrote on August 26: 

“Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has rejected four phone calls from US President Donald Trump as the countries’ relations sour, a German newspaper reported. The report in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (F.A.Z.) claimed that Modi remained frustrated and cautious about engaging in dialogue due to mounting pressure over tariffs. The US threatened India with a 25% tariff on exports to the US due to its purchases of Russian oil, on top of a 25% tariff due to a trade imbalance, meaning the country is facing a steep 50% duty in total on major industries like textiles, gems and jewellery, auto parts, and seafood. 

“Modi is reportedly maintaining his stance on continuing to buy Russian oil, which has been claimed to be financing ‘Putin’s war machine’, and resisting Trump’s pressure to open India’s markets to US agribusiness. The new rate [came into effect on] August 27, according to the executive order. A response from India’s foreign ministry on Wednesday August 6 said Delhi had already made clear its stance on imports from Russia, and deemed the tariff ‘unfair, unjustified and unreasonable’. 

“Analyst Mark Frazier said the American concept of an Indo-Pacific alignment—in which India plays a central role in containing China—’is falling apart’, according to the F.A.Z. report.” 

Of course it does. India will become part of the prophesied kings of the East under Russian-Chinese leadership. 

Coming… A Universal Vaccine? 

npr wrote on August 5: 

“The Department of Health and Human Services will cancel contracts and pull funding for some vaccines that are being developed to fight respiratory viruses like COVID-19 and the flu. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced in a statement Tuesday that 22 projects, totaling $500 million, to develop vaccines using mRNA technology will be halted. 

“Kennedy’s decision to terminate the projects is the latest in a string of decisions that have put the longtime vaccine critic’s doubts about shots into full effect at the nation’s health department. Kennedy has pulled back recommendations around the COVID-19 shots, fired the panel that makes vaccine recommendations, and refused to offer a vigorous endorsement of vaccinations as a measles outbreak worsened. 

“The health secretary criticized mRNA vaccines in a video on his social media accounts, explaining the decision to cancel projects being led by the nation’s leading pharmaceutical companies, including Pfizer and Moderna, that offer protection against viruses like the flu, COVID-19 and H5N1. ‘To replace the troubled mRNA programs, we’re prioritizing the development of safer, broader vaccine strategies, like whole-virus vaccines and novel platforms that don’t collapse when viruses mutate,’ Kennedy said in the video… Kennedy said work is underway on an alternative.

He said a ‘universal vaccine’ that mimics ‘natural immunity’ is the administration’s focus. ‘It could be effective — we believe it’s going to be effective — against not only coronaviruses, but also flu,’ he said.” 

So, replacing certain vaccines with another “universal vaccine” is the solution? 

“Army Base Used for WWII Japanese Internment Will Be Nation’s Largest ICE Detention Center” 

USA Today wrote on August 24: 

“Americans of Japanese heritage say they hear echoes of their families’ forced internment in the Trump administration’s newest immigrant detention site… erecting the nation’s largest immigrant detention site on Fort Bliss in El Paso, Texas.

“Eighty years ago,  Fort Bliss housed dozens of [American] people [of Japanese heritage] labeled ‘alien enemies’ by the government in a detention camp that included two compounds surrounded by double barbed wire fences… Smaller numbers of immigrants from Germany and Italy were also sent there after the United States joined European Allies and declared war against those countries. At least 113 first-generation Japanese Americans were shipped to the base before being sent to other holding areas across the country… 

“The people detained at Bliss… [were] the first in the eventual internment of over 125,000 Japanese Americans across the country, most of them U.S. citizens. For the vast majority, there were no accounts of wrongdoing other than being seen as ‘enemy aliens’ …. After Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor, the American government viewed Japanese immigrants and Japanese Americans as potential traitors… President Franklin Delano Roosevelt immediately invoked the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to detain people and confiscate their property.” 

Terrible. And it’s all repeating itself. 

Coming… Mass Deportations in the UK? 

Newsmax wrote on August 23: 

“Former Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage set out plans on Saturday for ‘mass deportations’ of migrants who have crossed the English Channel on small boats if his Reform UK party forms Britain’s next government… Farage said he would withdraw Britain from the European Convention on Human Rights and sign deals with Afghanistan, Eritrea, and other top countries of origin to repatriate illegal migrants… 

“Asked if he was concerned that asylum seekers would be killed or tortured if they were sent to countries with poor human rights records, Farage said he was more worried about the threat he believed asylum seekers posed to Britons. ‘I can’t be responsible for despotic regimes all over the world. But I can be responsible for the safety of women and girls on our streets,’ he said… 

“Broader opinion polls show that immigration and asylum are the public’s greatest concern, just ahead of the economy… 

“Last year 37,000 people — mostly from Afghanistan, Syria, Iran, Vietnam, and Eritrea — arrived in Britain from France by crossing the English Channel in small boats. The total was up by a quarter from 2023 and accounted for 9% of net migration. About two-thirds of people who arrive via small boats and claim asylum are successful and only 3% have been deported… 

“Farage told The Times he would end the right to claim asylum or to challenge deportation for those who arrived by small boats by replacing existing human rights legislation and opting Britain out of refugee treaties, citing a national emergency… The Times said Farage wanted to create holding facilities for 24,000 migrants on air bases at a cost of $3.4 billion and operate five deportation flights a day with total deportations reaching the hundreds of thousands. If that failed, asylum seekers could be held on Ascension Island, a British territory in the South Atlantic, to send a symbolic message, Farage said.” 

Politico added on August 23: 

“… the far-right politician, whose party currently leads consistently in the polls, said migrants coming to Britain by small boats should be arrested on arrival, detained in Royal Air Force bases, denied the right to asylum, and deported within 30 days…” 

Sky News added on August 23: 

“Only last autumn the Reform leader repeatedly shied away from the concept of ‘mass deportations’, describing the idea as ‘a political impossibility.’ But now he’s embraced Trump-style immigration rhetoric. 

“It’s not surprising that Reform want to capitalise on the outpouring of public anger over the use of hotels to house asylum seekers. The policy was started by the previous Conservative government, in response to housing shortages – and Labour has failed to make significant progress on its promise to stop it. But all the major parties have shifted firmly to the right on this issue. 

“There’s been very little political criticism of the aggressiveness of Farage’s policy suggestions, and the premise that the UK should no longer offer sanctuary to anyone who arrives here illegally…. current efforts to end the use of asylum hotels by 2029 are clearly not working. That’s a credibility gap Farage is more than ready to exploit.” 

Adopting Trump’s controversial approach to immigration is most certainly not an act to follow. 

UK Economy Heading for Collapse 

Express wrote on August 25: 

“They’re under the misapprehension that they can keep raising taxes without consequences – and have another £50 billion in store for us in autumn. Everyone else in the country knows the reality that if you push taxes too high some businesses go bust, others go abroad, and some move to the black market where they operate a cash-in-hand system to bypass handing over their hard-earned money to the Treasury… 

“It is so apparent those in government have never run anything commercially… What a bunch of clueless [politicians] we have in charge – they are not so much running the country as running the country into the ground…” 

Mystery of Bermuda Triangle Solved? 

Daily Mail wrote on August 25: 

“Dr Simon Boxall, an oceanographer from the University of Southampton,… says that the Bermuda Triangle’s record of disappearances is due to ‘rogue waves’… Towering up to 100 feet (30 metres) in the air, rogue waves are abnormally steep and can hit unexpectedly from directions other than the prevailing wind. According to Dr Boxall, a large ship trapped by one of these killer swells could ‘sink in a matter of two or three minutes’… 

“Theories surrounding the deadly pull of the Bermuda Triangle have spread widely ever since the disappearance of the USS Cyclops in 1918… Despite an extensive search, no trace of the 542-foot (165-metre) vessel or its 306 crew members has ever been found…” 

From all the “explanations,” this one seems to be one of the least convincing. It does not even address the disappearance of airplanes. At least 50 ships disappeared, as well as at least 20 airplanes, which never left any trace of a wreckage or survivors. But “scientists” who deny the existence of the “supernatural,” do not even consider that Satan and his demons might be behind many of these occurrences. However, the Church of God has been considering this possibility for over 60 years. 

No Two-State Solution 

Israel 365 News wrote on August 22: 

“US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee has firmly stated that establishing a Palestinian state is not a priority for the Trump administration, suggesting that Israel’s Arab neighbors could instead provide territory for such a state… effectively ruling out the establishment of such a state in the occupied West Bank… Huckabee went further, suggesting that no Palestinian state is likely ‘in our lifetime’, marking a significant departure from decades of US policy supporting a two-state solution… 

“‘One of the reasons we’re seeing the more aggressive decision [by Israel] to move into some of these areas is because it’s in reaction to what the Europeans have done — in concert with the Palestinian Authority — pushing for a unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state,’ Huckabee said. He added that these actions have had ‘a totally disastrous effect’ on stability in Judea and Samaria and on efforts to resolve the situation in Gaza…. ‘Pushing for unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state without the cooperation and participation of Israel is a violation of Oslo,’ Huckabee said… 

“Huckabee has long been a vocal supporter of Israeli settlement expansion in what he refers to as Judea and Samaria, the biblical names for the West Bank. The former Arkansas governor has previously argued that ‘there’s really no such thing as a Palestinian’ and has stated there is ‘no such place as the West Bank’… 

“The push for Palestinian recognition has gained momentum globally, particularly following Israel’s military operations in Gaza. The State of Palestine is recognised by 146 countries around the world… In the spring of 2024, more European and Caribbean nations recognized a Palestinian state, including Barbados, Ireland, Jamaica, Norway and Spain, while Slovenia also joined this group. Looking ahead, France, Malta, and Australia have announced plans to recognize Palestine as a state in September 2025 at the 2025 United Nations General Assembly, with Canada and the United Kingdom stating they will as well subject to certain conditions. In 2014, Sweden became the first country in Western Europe to recognise Palestine, setting a precedent that others have followed…”

Australia Expels Iran’s Ambassador Over Antisemitism 

JTA wrote on August 26: 

“Australia expelled Iran’s ambassador on Tuesday, accusing Tehran of orchestrating antisemitic arson attacks on Jewish institutions, as police in Melbourne announced a series of arrests tied to synagogue fires and vandalism that have rattled the country’s Jewish community. 

“Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the Iranian-directed attacks were ‘extraordinary and dangerous acts of aggression’ designed to destabilize Australia. The government will also designate Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organization and suspend operations at its embassy in Tehran. It has already moved Australian diplomats to a third country… 

“The Australian response appears to be the most extensive. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the expulsion of Ambassador Ahmad Sadeghi and three other Iranian officials was the first time Australia has taken such a step since World War II.” 

Increasing Antisemitism in France 

ntv wrote on August 25: 

“France has summoned US Ambassador Charles Kushner for today following a letter to French President Emmanuel Macron regarding antisemitic incidents. In the letter, Kushner expressed his ‘concern about the increase in antisemitic acts in France and pointed to an alleged failure of the French authorities to combat these acts,’ the French Foreign Ministry said. ‘The allegations are unacceptable,’ it added. It regrets the increase in antisemitic incidents in France since October 7, 2023, which are a reality. The French authorities will take all necessary measures to combat them, the ministry said… 

“The US ambassador to France has joined Israel’s criticism and accused French President Emmanuel Macron of ‘inadequate’ efforts to combat anti-Semitism. In a letter to Macron, he expressed his ‘deep concern about the dramatic rise in anti-Semitism in France and your government’s inadequate response to it.’ In France, not a day goes by ‘without Jews being attacked in the streets, synagogues or schools vandalized, or Jewish businesses vandalized,’ Kushner wrote. 

“Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused the French president last week of promoting anti-Semitism with the planned recognition of a Palestinian state. Nearly 500,000 Jews live in France, making it the largest Jewish community in Europe. Since the major attack by the radical Islamist Hamas on Israel on October 7, 2023, and the resulting war in Gaza Strip, the number of anti-Semitic acts in France and other countries has risen sharply.” 

Major Step Towards Compulsory Military Service 

The Washington Post wrote on August 27: 

“Germany took a major step Wednesday toward a controversial return to compulsory military service… On Wednesday… Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s cabinet approved a plan that would reinstate a form of conscription, which has not existed in Germany since being suspended in 2011. 

“The measure — subject to parliamentary approval this fall — would not subject Germans to draft cards and lotteries. Instead, starting next year, it would require 18-year-old German men to fill out a questionnaire about their physical fitness and willingness to serve. For women, the form would be voluntary. The bill also allows compulsory military service to be reinstated in the future, with parliamentary consent. Beginning in 2027, the bill would require all 18-year-old men to undergo a physical fitness exam. These measures would save time ‘if mandatory conscription for basic military service has to be activated, because conscription data will then already be available and will not have to be collected in this situation,’ according to the draft legislation… 

“‘The Bundeswehr must grow,’ Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said… ‘The international security situation, especially Russia’s aggressive behavior, demands this.’ If compulsory conscription is reinstated, conscientious objectors would be able to avoid the military, as was permitted previously, by performing civil service such as hospital work or disaster relief, the bill states… 

“‘There will be no way around conscription,’ Markus Söder, minister-president of the state of Bavaria and head of the Christian Social Union, the Bavarian sister party to Merz’s CDU, said on German TV ahead of the cabinet vote. Merz said Wednesday that the goal was to ‘make military service more attractive and bring in more young people to serve in the Bundeswehr.’ But, he added, ‘if we determine that we need to make adjustments, we will do so.’ Even Pistorius, a Social Democrat, conceded that voluntary measures might fall short. ‘There is no guarantee that voluntary participation will be sufficient.’”

Of International Interest? 

Nius wrote on August 25: 

“AfD politician Joachim Paul addressed high-ranking US politicians (Marco Rubio and JD Vance) and entrepreneur Elon Musk in a video on the X platform. In the English-language message, he reports having been excluded from the upcoming mayoral election in Ludwigshafen. Paul calls it a ‘case of international interest’ and asks for support… 

“‘The pretext is that I met with the wrong people, I spoke to the wrong people. The real reason is: They want to stay in power at all costs, and they don’t want to change the migration policy – ​​which has led to a major crisis in Germany and especially in Ludwigshafen.’ 

Elon Musk already commented on the video: ‘Excluded from the election without having committed any crime?'” 

No Longer a Democracy? 

Focus wrote on August 25: 

“Germany calls itself a democracy, but the reality is sobering: Parties have hijacked the political system… At the same time, citizens’ trust is plummeting. According to studies by the Allensbach Institute and the Research Group on Elections, trust in parties is at historic lows. More and more people are turning away or seeking salvation in protest votes. This is no coincidence. It is the direct result of a politics that has lost touch with the people… 

“Parties control every access to power…. In the Bundestag, voting is based on party discipline, not individual conviction… We must not fool ourselves: Hardly anyone will develop the perfect solution from within… It is naive to believe that change comes from within. Anyone who reaches the executive board or even the top of a party is living proof that the system works for them. Why should someone change a system that made them great? That is the paradox: We expect reform from party leadership that costs them power… Germany doesn’t need a steward of the old, but an Innovator of the future…” 

Grenell: “Germans Sick and Tired of Weak Woke Response.” 

Brussels Signal wrote on August 25: 

“Richard Grenell, the US Presidential Envoy for Special Missions, has criticised German Chancellor Friedrich Merz over Germany’s lax response to a rise in immigrant crime. In a post on X on August 24, Grenell – who served as the US ambassador to Germany from 2018 to 2020 during Donald Trump’s first presidency – wrote: ‘Friedrich Merz must understand that the German people are sick and tired of this weak and woke response.’ 

“Grenell’s remarks came as a reaction to the stabbing of a US student on a German tram that was allegedly committed by a Syrian asylum seeker. The US student himself had posted a video from hospital shortly after the attack that showed him with a bandaged face. ‘If [allegedly criminal asylum seekers] can do this to the people of Germany and then just get released 12 hours later, where’s the law?’ he said. 

“The 21-year-old student said he had witnessed two men accosting a group of young women on a tram in Dresden (Saxony) late on the night of August 23. According to German police the US citizen intervened to help the harassed women. In reaction the two then allegedly started hitting him. A short while later one of them pulled out a knife and allegedly stabbed him in the face several times. The student was seriously… injured and rushed to the hospital with several slash wounds to his face. Photos in German newspapers showed the blood-spattered interior of the tram. 

“The alleged attackers fled but one was later apprehended. According to German newspaper Bild on August 24he… reportedly has a police record including alleged bodily harm, robbery and illegal immigration to Germany. The suspect was taken into custody but released a couple of hours later by decision of the public prosecutor’s office. Public prosecutor Jürgen Schmidt told Bild: ‘According to the assessment of the duty prosecutor, there were insufficient grounds for detention. He cannot be held responsible for the knife attack.’… Germany only allows pretrial detention as a rare exception. Reportedly, the prosecutors saw no chance of obtaining an arrest warrant from the investigating judge in this case as there was no risk of Majd A fleeing, concealing evidence or reoffending as he has a permanent place of residence…” 

Due to national and international pressure, the Dresden prosecutors seem to have awakened from their sleep. Note the next article. 

Deutsche Welle added on August 26: 

“Dresden police and prosecutors said on Tuesday that they had arrested a 21-year-old Syrian… and was put in investigative custody on suspicion of grievous bodily harm, among other offenses. 

“The man in question had already been detained once before and was released soon after the incident… Police said… that after further investigation there was now reasonable grounds to suspect that he was ‘involved in the knife attack against the 20-year-old American and also himself injured the victim with a dangerous object.’ Tuesday’s statement made no direct mention of the second suspect [who is still at large]. 

 Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

Back to top

Are Christians currently involved in war?

With all that is going on in the world at present, war is on many people’s minds. War is a terrible thing, showing the worst excesses of sinful man.   On the website worldpopulationreview.com, we read that there are currently 12 different countries involved in war, civil war, drug wars and terrorist insurgencies.

We have a 78-page booklet entitled, Should You Fight in War? This is a thorough exposition well worth reading, or re-reading, showing that it is not the way that man should behave, ever!   On pages 17 and 20, we read under the heading “THE CHRISTIAN DUTY—TODAY!” the following:

“True Christians need to understand that they must already have God’s attitude toward peace and war, knowing that PEACE, not WAR, will be the reality of the future world under God’s rule. They must lead by their good example TODAY, showing others that we can live the way to peace and avoid the way to war. 

“Clearly, we cannot participate in war—neither in a literal sense, nor in the sense of advocating war with our lips, or even entertaining thoughts of war. Rather, we have to bring ‘every thought’ into captivity to the obedience of Christ (compare 2 Corinthians 10:5). That is, we must be sure that our thoughts conform to Christ’s thoughts, and if we think thoughts of war, rather than peace, we must eradicate those thoughts from our minds.”

There is also a section in the same booklet, titled, “Killing in War Breaks the Ten Commandments,” which should be pretty obvious to a true Christian.   Unfortunately, there are those in mainstream Christianity who think otherwise; for example, a lay Anglican theologian and Associate Tutor in Doctrine wrote:

“Because the cause of war is sin it is never legitimate for Christians to precipitate warfare. It is not right for Christians to attack other people, or other nations, as part of an army out of a desire to kill them or to take what they possess. Down the centuries there have been Christians who would go further than this and say that Christians must never go to war for any cause at all. However, this has not been the majority Christian view. The majority view has been that although Christians may not start a war as a result of sinful desire, they may nevertheless engage in warfare. As Article XXXVII of the Church of England’s Thirty-Nine Articles puts it, ‘It is lawful for Christian men, at the command of the Magistrate, to wear weapons, and to serve in the wars’” (our emphasis by underlining).

In Matthew 26:51-52 we read:

And suddenly, one of those who were with Jesus stretched out his hand and drew his sword, struck the servant of the high priest, and cut off his ear.But Jesus said to him, ‘Put your sword in its place, for all who take the sword will perish by the sword.’”

Here, Jesus, as He was being arrested, made the telling comment that “all who take the sword will perish by the sword,” which certainly rules out fighting in war.

From the earliest dawn of civilization, men have fought and waged war.   The Bible is replete with example after example of such conflicts.   And, of course, it shows no sign of diminishing.   How seriously do we take our calling?   Is our Christian faith just a hobby or a Way of Life to which we are fully committed?   

Older members may well recall that Mr. Herbert W. Armstrong (the late Pastor-General of the now defunct Worldwide Church of God) stated a number of times that he wondered whether even 50% of the Church “got it” (that is, thoroughly understand and live by every Word of God supporting the Church in its God-given responsibilities).   Some used to be amazed that he would say that.  They thought that he had made a mistake by saying that.   In a sense, he did, as it appears from what has happened since his death in 1986 that not even 50% “got it”.   A much smaller percentage, it seems, have stayed with the Truth.   But there will still be tares growing with the wheat in the Church of God today as the Bible reveals.

However, the point of this Q&A is a reminder that the war that true Christians ARE currently involved in is very real!   It is not with physical weapons, military operations or armed struggles that we contend with as our focus, but spiritual warfare that will decide our eternal future.

This warfare is spiritual.   We have been warned about this over many decades and many reading this Q&A will be very familiar with the knowledge of the forthcoming persecution that will increase in intensity the nearer we get to the time of trouble as set out in Matthew 24:21:

For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been since the beginning of the world until this time, no, nor ever shall be.”

From what is happening in the world today, it must be obvious for those with eyes to see that we are rapidly heading towards the Great Tribulation and the Day of the Lord and the return of Jesus Christ, and it will happen with God’s perfect timing.

Jesus revealed to His disciples that persecutions would be coming, as they were then, and will be in the near future, as Matthew 10:22 shows:

“And you will be hated by all for My name’s sake. But he who endures to the end will be saved.”

There may be those in the Church who may think or say that we’ve heard all this before, but history shows us that some did not make it to the end.   Therefore, we all still have to be on our spiritual toes to make completely sure to God that we will stay loyal and faithful to Him and to our Calling.   Some won’t make it, and let us ensure that we are not among that number.  

1 Corinthians 10:12 is very instructive: “Therefore let him who thinks he stands take heed lest he fall.” 

This is talking about vigilance and ongoing self-examination, and all of us have to be careful that we stay on the straight and narrow path without deviation.   We are to have a continuous, active watchfulness about the Way of Life we have chosen and must not be shaken or moved away from God’s Way.    

Psalm 16:8 sums this up perfectly: ”I have set the LORD always before me; Because He is at my right hand I shall not be moved.”

And Philippians 1:6 complements this view: “… being confident of this very thing, that He who has begun a good work in you will complete it until the day of Christ Jesus.”

Matthew 24:13 gives us knowledge of what it will take to be in the Kingdom of God: “But he who endures to the end shall be saved.”

The forces that we are to be well aware of are shown in Ephesians 6:12:

“For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.”

Our enemies, the ones that we are at war with, are the dark, demonic forces of Satan and His demons as they influence this world with their evil manipulative powers.

We read further about the source of our problems in 1 Peter 5:8-9:

“Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil walks about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour. Resist him, steadfast in the faith, knowing that the same sufferings are experienced by your brotherhood in the world.”

Jesus told the Jews the Truth about Satan the devil in John 8:44:

“You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it.”

On the other hand, Titus 1:2 explains: “… in hope of eternal life which God, who cannot lie, promised before time began.”

The difference on just this one issue of Truth between God and Satan is stark.

We read in 2 Corinthians 10:4: “For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds…”

When the apostle Paul mentions “the weapons of our warfare,” he doesn’t point to the usual normal physical items that they would have had at their disposal 2,000 years ago but the spiritual sources that God makes available to His people – “divine tools that have the strength to break down barriers and strongholds,” as one commentator put it.   Carnal signifies the ways of man but the people of God rely on God Himself Who will help and guide us through the most difficult of times.

We don’t want to be in the position that Jesus outlined in Matthew 7:23: “And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’”

What is the answer?   How do we succeed?

We know that in the Millennium, there will not be war as we read in Isaiah 2:4: “He shall judge between the nations, And rebuke many people; They shall beat their swords into plowshares, And their spears into pruning hooks; Nation shall not lift up sword against nation, Neither shall they learn war anymore.”

That is the future to look forward to, but in the meantime, what do we do?   We touched on Ephesians 6:12 showing who we are fighting against but the whole passage of Ephesians 6:10-18 reveals the whole armor of God which is for our protection:

“Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord and in the power of His might. Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.

Stand therefore, having girded your waist with truth, having put on the breastplate of righteousness, and having shod your feet with the preparation of the gospel of peace; above all, taking the shield of faith with which you will be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked one. And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God; praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, being watchful to this end with all perseverance and supplication for all the saints…”

We know that at this time, the broadcasting of Satan will be increasing as he sees his time is running out.   Many members have illness, sickness, serious health concerns and these can lead to discouragement and depression, maybe even questioning our calling at times.   We have to hang on to our love of God the Father and Jesus Christ, keeping them at the centre of our lives, pray, study and trust in Him Who is able to bring us through our own individual problems and concerns.

Mr. Herbert W. Armstrong made these comments about true spirituality, which is a state that we must be seeking unless our religion is a hobby. If it is a hobby, these words won’t count, but if our Christianity is a Way of Life, these words should remind us of our commitment.   He said, as stated in The Good News, in the June/July 84 edition:

“The spiritual mind is the surrendered, yielded mind.   It is the mind that has given up all wanting its own way.   It is the mind that has been conquered in its rebellion against God.

“It is the mind that, henceforth, is willing to obey God no matter what the cost, and that continually studies God’s Word, not to argue and strive and corner others, but to learn more of God’s will, and to walk in it!”

Our baptism was symbolic of our decision to put God first in our lives, no matter what the circumstances.   For those of us who have been Church members for many years, do we still feel the same today?   We accepted the condition to love God more than anyone or anything else – with all of our heart, with all our soul and with all of our mind.   This is the greatest commandment of all.   Does it have first priority in our lives?   And after that, does the second great commandment – loving neighbour as ourselves – have priority in our lives?

The good news, which must now be just around the corner, can be found in Revelation 12:12 where we read: “Therefore rejoice, O heavens, and you who dwell in them! Woe to the inhabitants of the earth and the sea! For the devil has come down to you, having great wrath, because he knows that he has a short time.”   This shows a time, possibly yet future, when Satan will be cast out of heaven to the earth and when he will persecute the Church as we read in verses 13-17.   However, the Church will be protected and we may very well be near that time now.

Finally, and most importantly, we must stress that in spite of all the messages in magazines, booklets, Q&A’s, sermons and sermonettes that have been made available over many decades, many have fallen away and detached themselves from the One Who is able to protect and provide for us.

We read in 2 Thessalonians 2:3:  “Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition…”

There is a falling away to come; the Bible says so, and so it will happen.   Let us not be among that number and let us take heed of the fact that Satan is at war with all of God’s people, trying to deny them a position in the Family of God for eternity.

We have been warned many times about this, and this is the latest admonition in a long line of previous warnings.

The question asked in this Q&A was: “Are Christians currently involved in war?” We hope that we have answered that question.   We are at war spiritually which will affect our future eternal life.   Let us make the most of this incredible opportunity that God has afforded us and win this war!

Lead Writer: Brian Gale (United Kingdom)

Back to top

Preaching the Gospel and Feeding the Flock

compiled by Dave Harris

“Demons Rule This World!” is the title of a new StandingWatch program, presented by Evangelist Norbert Link. Here is the summary:

If you are still not convinced of the Truth of this statement, this program will give you several examples of absolutely demonic behavior—from today’s murder of innocent Catholic schoolchildren in Minnesota, the horrific developments in Russia regarding innocent children and Putin’s questioning the spirits, to the White House Faith Office.

“Dämonen beherrschen diese Welt!” is the title of a new AufPostenStehen program, presented by Norbert Link. This German program covers the same topics as described above.

“Die Bedeutung der Tierwelt für uns heute, morgen und in Zukunft,” last Sabbath’s German sermonette presented by Patrick Flueck, is now posted. Title in English: “The Significance of the Animal World for Us Today, Tomorrow and the the Future.”

“It Is Possible to Please God!” last Sabbath’s sermonette presented by Dave Harris, is now posted. Here is the summary:

Our Savior, Jesus Christ, did please God, and we have His tremendous example to follow in order to attain eternal life in the Kingdom of God.

“How Do You Worship?” last Sabbath’s sermon presented by Eric Rank, is now posted. Here is the summary:

Worship is such a basic function of Christianity that we rarely consider what it means and how to do it. What are the examples of worship in the Bible that we can learn from? As converted Christians, how does God want us to worship Him?

2025 FALL HOLY DAYS:

September 23  Feast of Trumpets

October 2  Day of Atonement

October 7-13  Feast of Tabernacles

October 14  Last Great Day

Back to top


How This Work is Financed

This Update is an official publication by the ministry of the Church of the Eternal God in the United States of America; the Church of God, a Christian Fellowship in Canada; and the Global Church of God in the United Kingdom.

Editorial Team: Norbert Link, Dave Harris, Rene Messier, Brian Gale, Johanna Link, Eric Rank, Michael Link, Anna Link, Kalon Mitchell, Manuela Mitchell, Dawn Thompson

Technical Team: Eric Rank, Shana Rank

Our activities and literature, including booklets, weekly updates, sermons on CD are provided free of charge. They are made possible by the tithes, offerings and contributions of Church members and others who have elected to support this Work.

While we do not solicit the general public for funds, contributions are gratefully welcomed and are tax-deductible in the U.S. and Canada.

Donations can be sent to the following addresses:

United States: Church of the Eternal God, P.O. Box 270519, San Diego, CA 92198

Canada: Church of God, ACF, Box 1480, Summerland, B.C. V0H 1Z0

United Kingdom: Global Church of God, PO Box 44, MABLETHORPE, LN12 9AN, United Kingdom

It Is Possible to Please God! / How Do You Worship?

On August 23, 2025, Dave Harris will present the sermonette, titled, “It Is Possible to Please God!” and Eric Rank will present the sermon, titled, “How Do You Worship?”

The live services are available, over video and audio, at http://eternalgod.org/live-services/ (12:30 pm Pacific Time; 1:30 pm Mountain Time; 2:30 pm Central Time; 3:30 pm Eastern Time; 8:30 pm Greenwich Mean Time; 9:30 pm Central European Time). Just click on Connect to Live Stream.

This Week in the News

“Boris Johnson: Trump-Putin Summit ‘Most Vomit-Inducing’ Ever” 

Upday.com wrote on August 16: 

“Boris Johnson delivered a scathing assessment of Donald Trump’s Alaska summit with Vladimir Putin, calling it ‘the most vomit-inducing episode in all the tawdry history of international diplomacy.’ The former Prime Minister condemned the red carpet treatment given to the Russian leader during their three-hour meeting… on August 15. 

“Writing in his Daily Mail column, Johnson described his visceral reaction to watching Putin welcomed on American soil. ‘It was emetic to see him applauded on the red carpet,’ he wrote, particularly criticising Putin being invited to ride in Trump’s presidential limousine – a privilege rarely extended to world leaders facing war crimes accusations. 

The former Prime Minister compared Putin directly to Hitler, arguing the Russian leader’s ‘continual lies, dissimulation and aggression’ mirror the Nazi dictator. Johnson expressed outrage at hearing Trump refer to Putin as ‘the boss’ and describe their ‘fantastic relationship’ while Ukrainian civilians face daily bombardment… 

“The former Prime Minister assessed that Putin fundamentally wants to control Ukraine and make it a vassal state of Moscow… The former Prime Minister challenged European allies to match American leadership on sanctions. ‘This is our continent. We continually demand leadership from America – and yet when we get that leadership we don’t even have the guts to follow suit,’ Johnson wrote.” 

Trump Embarrassed by Fox News 

Express wrote on August 16: 

“US President Donald Trump was embarrassed on Fox News after failing to make a deal with Vladimir Putin… Fox News’ Jacqui Henrich, a senior White House correspondent, called out the President in a live video link to the studio, in a move that is extremely rare for the news channel… 

“She said: ‘It was very unusual, atypical… the way it felt in the room was not good, it did not seem like things went well and it seemed Putin came in and steamrolled, got right into what he wanted to say and said what he wanted to say to the President and then left.’” 

Putin Got Everything… Trump Got Nothing! 

The Independent wrote on August 16: 

“Vladimir Putin wanted to stave off the threat of US sanctions, he wanted to gain more time to prosecute his war against Ukraine, he wanted to end his and Russia’s diplomatic isolation, he wanted to peel the US off from the rest of Europe, he wanted to keep Zelensky as far away from this as far as possible and he wanted to flatter his host, Donald Trump… [Putin] flew back to Moscow having achieved everything he wanted. There are no new sanctions. Donald Trump literally rolled out the red carpet for him and applauded Putin before shaking his hand warmly. The meeting took place on US soil, with all European leaders thousands of miles away…. 

“Steve Witkoff, [Trump’s] special envoy (and a man with zero diplomatic experience), who laid the ground for this summit, has been turning up in Moscow with only his girlfriend for company. At the Kremlin meetings, he has set completely alone opposite the combined might of Putin, foreign minister Sergei Lavrov and key adviser Yuri Ushakov. Witkoff had no note takers, no advisers, and was 100 per cent reliant on a Kremlin translator… 

“Should Ukraine be concerned? Should Europe be concerned about the way this summit has come about and the way it’s unfolded? They’d be stark raving mad not to be.” 

Change of Plans? 

Newsmax wrote on August 17: 

“President Donald Trump has reportedly privately indicated to European leaders he is open to offering U.S. security guarantees to Ukraine — a significant shift in his stance toward America’s role in ending the war. The change in position came after Trump’s high-profile summit in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin, where Trump sought to push Moscow toward a ceasefire, but according to Trump’s own account, Putin told him he would not stop fighting and demanded that Kyiv cede parts of eastern Ukraine in exchange for freezing the front line elsewhere…

“Despite Trump’s vow to secure a ceasefire at the risk of ‘severe consequences’ to Putin and Russia, the Alaska summit produced no ceasefire agreement and Trump has pivoted toward what he described as a ‘direct path to a peace agreement,’ aligning with Putin’s preference to negotiate final terms rather than interim pauses in fighting.” 

Complete Disappointment 

Deutsche Welle wrote on August 17: 

“A red carpet for Vladimir Putin and no results for Ukraine. The Alaska summit, which many had pinned high hopes on, turned out to be a complete disappointment from the perspective of many Ukrainians….  Oleksandr Kraiev of the Ukrainian Prism think tank told DW: ‘…The war criminal Putin came to the US and shook hands with the leader of the free world.’  According to Kraiev, apart from ‘Trump’s deference toward Putin, there were no final answers to the most important questions.’ He believes that Putin dealt with Trump ‘with surgical precision’ and told him everything Trump wanted to hear. This way, Putin got everything he wanted out of the summit.   

“According to Ivan Us from Ukraine’s Center for Foreign Policy of the National Institute for Strategic Studies, the Russian president never wanted the summit to lead to an end to the war. Instead, Putin’s goal was to legitimize himself and end his international isolation… Judging by discussions among ordinary Ukrainians, what angers them most is the red carpet that was rolled out for Putin at the US military base in Anchorage. Countless angry comments on social media leave little doubt over how this was perceived in Ukraine.” 

The reaction of the German and European press has been devastating. Headlines read like, “The nightmare of the Europeans has become true.” Hypocritical and quite silly comments by European politicians thanking Trump and saying he brought the world closer to peace only contribute to the anger of the German and European people. 

Zelensky Set Up to Fail? 

Express wrote on August 17:

“Donald Trump knows there is zero chance of a workable peace deal…, former defence committee chairman Tobias Ellwood has warned. And the Ukrainian President is being ‘set up to fail’ by his US counterpart, who was himself ‘manipulated’ by Vladimir Putin during their high-profile summit on Friday, the ex-British Army officer claimed. 

“Mr Ellwood said: ‘I see Trump deliberately setting this up to fail so he can then walk away and say, “I tried, they didn’t want to play ball.”’ The former MP… painted a picture of a summit dominated by strategic manoeuvring rather than concrete support for Ukraine.” 

No Security Guarantees? 

Fox News wrote on August 18: 

“The Russian Foreign Ministry roundly rejected the idea of NATO forces serving as peacekeepers in Ukraine, a provision sought by Ukrainian President Voldodymyr Zelensky and his European allies in U.S.-brokered peace talks. 

“‘We confirm the position that has been voiced more than once about our categorical rejection of any scenarios involving the appearance of Ukraine military contingent with the participation of NATO countries (which is fraught with an uncontrolled escalation of the conflict with unpredictable consequences),’ a foreign ministry statement reported by Russian state media outlet Ria read. President Donald Trump already suggested a European-led peacekeeping force to ensure Russia does not invade Ukraine again would be a part of peace talks. Asked if U.S. would contribute forces, Trump said: ‘[Europe is] first line of defense, because they’re there, they’re Europe, but we’re going to help them out also, we’ll be involved…’” 

There are discussions on the Ukrainian, American and European side to guarantee protection “similar to” the one afforded in Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty (which would require NATO membership). Newsmax said on August 18 that “President Donald Trump told Ukraine to give up hopes of getting back annexed Crimea or joining NATO.”  

But even Article 5 is no absolute guarantee of protection for NATO members. It states: 

“The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them . . . shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking . . . such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.” 

Brennan Center for Justice wrote on March 4, 2022:

“This language is relatively flexible. It permits each NATO member to decide for itself what action should be taken to address an armed attack on a NATO ally. It does not require any member to respond with military force, although it permits such responses as a matter of international law. A member may decide that instead of responding with force, it will send military equipment to NATO allies or impose sanctions on the aggressor.”

It may also conclude that no actions are necessary at all. 

No American Boots on the Ground 

Newsmax wrote on August 19: 

“President Donald Trump said American soldiers will not be on the ground, as long as he is president, despite pledging participation in Article 5-type security guarantees in a potential Russia-Ukraine peace deal… The ‘coalition of the willing’ – a subset of major NATO countries including France, Germany, and the U.K. – is ready to commit their troops in Ukraine to defend against Russian aggression…” 

Tentatively, a meeting is planned soon [within the next two weeks?] between Zelensky and Putin, suggested by Putin to be held in Moscow, with Trump as mediator. Reportedly, Zelensky rejected the location. According to other reports, Budapest (Hungary) could be chosen as the place for negotiations, or Geneva (Switzerland), which has promised Putin immunity if he travels to the city for peace talks.   

Who Would Send Troops?

Deutsche Welle wrote on August 21:

“‘Germany’s contribution to security guarantees has not yet been determined and this issue will be decided at the political and military levels,’ German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said on Tuesday. He added that there were still too many uncertainties…

“Denmark, Sweden, the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal and the Baltic states have also signaled their willingness to participate in a possible peacekeeping force in Ukraine.

However other European states are more cautious. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk rejects the deployment of Polish soldiers… Hungary and Slovakia are also opposed to the deployment of European troops…

“Austria and Italy are also cautious. Italian Prime minister Giorgia Meloni is particularly skeptical… [and] has so far avoided making any clear commitments….

“In any case, nothing will happen without a prior agreement with Russia. But Moscow has so far categorically rejected the deployment of NATO troops to Ukraine and there is little indication that would change.”

How the Phone Call Came About… 

Focus wrote on August 19: 

“Chancellor Friedrich Merz apparently played a decisive role in Donald Trump interrupting the Ukraine summit on Monday evening to speak with Russian President Vladimir Putin on the phone. As ‘Bild‘ reports, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky reportedly told the group about a child who had been abducted to Russia. The child’s parents knew where the child was but had no way of contacting him or bringing him back home. 

“In total, Russia is said to have abducted 19,500 children. Many of them were given up for adoption. Zelensky is also said to have given Trump a letter from his wife, Olena, to Melania Trump, in which she thanked the US President’s wife. A few days earlier, [Melania] had asked Putin in a letter to ‘protect the innocence of children.’ 

“According to the ‘Bild‘ report, Zelensky’s story is said to have deeply affected Trump. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is said to have advised the US President to call Putin immediately and confront him about it. Trump then left the room and, contrary to his plan, spoke to the Kremlin chief on the phone before the end of the summit.” 

Newsmax added on August 19: 

“Trump left the European leaders seated in the Oval Office when he went to another room to privately call Putin at 1 a.m. local time in Russia… [Reportedly, the call lasted 40 minutes.] ‘I didn’t do that in front of them, that would be disrespectful to President Putin,’ Trump said. ‘President Putin wouldn’t talk to the people from Europe – that is part of the problem.’…” 

Merz Challenges Trump 

DPA wrote on August 18: 

“German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Monday took a hard stance on the need for a ceasefire in Ukraine before a peace deal with Russia can be signed, as European leaders convened in Washington with US President Donald Trump. In a public statement in the White House, alongside Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky, Italian Prime Minister Giogia Meloni, Britain’s Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron [as well as Finnish President Alexander Stubb and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte], Merz said that ‘the path is open’ for negotiations to end the war in Ukraine. However, he warned that a trilateral meeting between Trump, Putin and Zelensky should not take place without a ceasefire in force

“‘I can’t imagine that the next meeting would take place without a ceasefire,’ Merz said. ‘Let’s try to put pressure on Russia because the credibility of these efforts we are undertaking today are depending on at least a ceasefire from the beginning of the serious negotiations.’ 

“The meeting came days after Trump hosted Putin in Alaska, after which he dropped his long-held calls for an immediate ceasefire in the war.” 

Fox News added on August 18: 

“Trump was asked about the prospect of a pre-deal ceasefire earlier Monday.  ‘I don’t think you’d need a ceasefire. If you look at the six deals that I settled this year, they were all at war – I didn’t do any ceasefires…’”

Trump’s Claims He Ended Six Wars 

The New York Post wrote on August 18: 

“President Trump repeated his frequent claim Monday that he’s ended six wars during his term in office. The White House has claimed that Trump resolved conflicts between the following countries:

lsrael and Iran less than two months ago, during which the US bombed three of the Islamic Republic’s nuclear sites; Democratic Republic of Congo and RwandaCambodia and ThailandIndia and PakistanSerbia and KosovoEgypt and Ethiopia

“The extent to which Trump played a role in resolving these disputes is debatable. Furthermore, some of the conflicts ended with fragile accords. The peace deal between the DRC and Rwanda, for example, concluded with the involvement of a key Rwanda-backed rebel group. The conflicts between Israel and Iran, as well as India and Pakistan, are frozen rather than resolved.” 

The following article gives more insight. 

Politico wrote on August 18: 

“The list of wars Trump professes to have ended starts with the clash between India and Pakistan last May… India, however, vociferously denies any U.S. involvement in bringing the fighting to a close… Actual peace would mean settling the competing claims over Kashmir, which have resulted in violent clashes and wars between the two nations for decades… And while the active fighting may have ended for now, the underlying conflict very much continues to mark relations between the two countries. 

“Next on Trump’s list of peace deals is the clash between Israel and Iran… Trump’s decision to target core parts of Iran’s nuclear program did clearly play an important role in ending Israel’s bombing strikes and Iran’s counterstrikes. But that’s a far cry from achieving lasting peace. Instead, Iran will now likely intensify its effort to build a nuclear weapon, and Israel has made clear it reserves the right to strike at any time if Iran were to rebuild its nuclear or missile program and air defenses. 

“Not long after, in late June, came a comparatively more substantial deal to end the fighting between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Brokered by the U.S. and signed in the Oval Office, the agreement requires Rwanda to withdraw its troops from the DRC within 90 days… But while this deal is, indeed, a real step toward ending the conflict, it’s important to remember that the key lies in its implementation. And on that front, news is much more mixed, as fighting between the Rwandan-backed M23 rebel group and the DRC continues unabated — in part because M23 didn’t sign on to the deal. 

“The following month then saw Trump have a hand in securing a ceasefire between Cambodia and Thailand, after violent border clashes had erupted in late July. Facing pressure from China, Malaysia and the promise of trade deals with the U.S., the two countries eventually agreed to stop shooting and halt dispatching more troops to the region. Yet again, the underlying conflict that resulted in these armed clashes remains unresolved. Cambodia and Thailand have been fighting over the demarcation of their border, including for the crucial location of centuries-old Hindu temples along their 800-kilometer frontier, for decades now… 

“Finally, earlier this month, the U.S. president presided over the conclusion of a major agreement ending the war between Azerbaijan and Armenia. Following major clashes over Nagorno-Karabakh — an enclave in Azerbaijan that Armenia had seized in 1992 and Baku regained in 2023 — much of the leg work on this agreement had been completed before Trump took office. But two sticking points remained: A demand from Azerbaijan that Armenia erase any claim to Nagorno-Karabakh from its constitution — which will require a referendum — and a transportation link between two parts of Azerbaijan that runs through Armenian territory. Under Trump, the U.S.-brokered talks did lead to an agreement, including a U.S.-leased roadway connecting the two areas of Azerbaijan — a substantial deal and a real accomplishment. But, again, implementation will be key. 

“Nonetheless, Trump’s boast of ending six wars in six months is a lot less than meets the eye. The fact is, even if he had been completely successful in ending these wars, his record would still be overshadowed by his failure to end the two wars he actually vowed to solve— the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. Far from ending them in 24 hours, as he boasted he would do during his reelection campaign, the situation in both has worsened since Trump’s return: In Gaza, the U.S. leader has essentially given the Israeli government a green light to occupy the strip, washing his hands of any effort to secure an end to the fighting. Meanwhile, in Ukraine, he sought to move the peace process forward by meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska — only to come up empty-handed and seemingly more in sync with Moscow than Kyiv…” 

The subsequent meeting in Washington turned out to be much better. However, Trump (and others) keep talking about a land swap… that Ukraine will have to give land to Russia… a demand which Ukraine had continuously rejected. 

Russia and China Demand a Say on Security Guarantees

Daily Mail wrote on August 21:

“Ukraine peace talks were in disarray on Wednesday after Russia effectively demanded Moscow and Beijing get a veto on any security guarantees…

“Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Moscow must be part of the security guarantees. Putin’s man also said these ‘should be provided on an equal basis with the participation of countries such as China, the United States, the UK and France’. Lavrov added: ‘I’m sure in the West they understand that seriously discussing security issues without Russia is a utopia, it’s a road to nowhere.’

“[It would mean] none of the guarantors would be allowed to defend Ukraine from Russia unless they all agreed, including China and Russia.”

Trump’s Confession

 The Daily Mail reported on August 19: 

“President Donald Trump talked about his desire for eternal salvation as he discussed ongoing efforts to negotiate a lasting peace between Russia and Ukraine. 

“He invoked the Bible during an interview on Fox & Friends one day after hosting historic meetings at the White House to broker peace between the countries. ‘I want to get to heaven if possible. I’m hearing I’m not doing well. I hear I’m at the bottom of the totem pole,’ Trump said.”

ICE Deportations of the Wrong People Harmful to the US 

The New York Post wrote on August 17: 

“President Donald Trump delivered on his key campaign promise: Securing the border. Yet the only thing falling faster than illegal crossings has been his approval rating on immigration. The problem: Instead of building on his win at the border with more popular arrests of criminal threats inside the country, the administration is going after migrants indiscriminately.  

“Democrats can’t deny it: The border crisis is over. Border Patrol arrests have fallen nearly 90% since December to near-record lows. Nonetheless, only 40% of voters approved of the president’s handling of immigration… while 55% disapproved… Of course, people don’t actually want more illegal immigration. Polls consistently show that the president is the most trusted on the border. Instead, it’s the deportations from within the United States driving the discontent…  

“That doesn’t mean voters back the other side — 84% disagree with Democrats who want to suspend deportations completely… But Trump emphasized that he would prioritize ending ‘sanctuary and protection for dangerous criminals’ — the position of 81% of voters. Unfortunately, most voters don’t believe the president is doing that right now. 

“Even as late as June, voters told CBS News they thought that the president was prioritizing ‘dangerous criminals’ over peaceful immigrants 53%-47%. By mid-July, it was 44%-56% the other way — an 18 point swing in a month. What happened? Voters started to see how the priorities shifted… agents were instructed in late May to focus on ‘quantity over quality’ to meet a 3,000-per-day ‘goal’ set by the White House. ICE was advised to target people looking for work at Home Depot and to raid businesses in industries likely to employ illegal workers. 

“Rather than scooping up violent criminals recklessly sent back to the streets by New York City…, ICE is arresting immigrants who are helping power the Trump economy. Since the White House ordered the change, there has been a dramatic escalation in arrests of people without criminal records. In June, the number of immigrants arrested without criminal convictions was 1,100% higher than it was even in 2017 during the first Trump term: nearly 6,000 per week. 

“Yet there are still half a million illegal immigrants with criminal convictions out there to remove — and ICE should locate them before spending its time and resources on workers. It’s common sense: ICE agents told The Post that the policy was ‘leading them to leave some dangerous criminal illegal migrants on the streets.’   

“Setting aside politics and crime, Trump has already publicly acknowledged there’s an economic downside to these non-criminal deportations. ‘Our aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long-time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,’ he said in June, referencing farms, hotels, and leisure businesses.  The president is correct. Besides the border, the president’s other primary election issue was inflation. And immigrants reduce inflation — not, as critics claim, by depressing wages for American workers, but by increasing production of goods and services. When supply decreases, prices go up for consumers, as we painfully saw throughout the pandemic… 

“Whatever the immigration politics are, Trump’s midterm success will ultimately depend most on his economic outcomes. Americans re-elected him because they remember his first term before the pandemic as a period of stable wage and job growth — but random mass deportations are both politically unpopular and economically destabilizing. Although the president has promised ‘changes are coming’ on deportations, none have yet occurred….”

In addition, Donald Trump promised to prioritize arrests, detentions and deportations of dangerous criminal illegal migrants. This promise has been clearly broken by Stephen Miller, Kristi Noem, Tom Homan and others. 

Don’t Pull the Plug on Israel 

The Algemeiner wrote on August 15: 

“US Sen. Lindsey Graham delivered a forceful defense of the US-Israel alliance at a South Carolina Republican Party meeting on Wednesday, warning that withdrawing American support for the Jewish state would carry both strategic and spiritual consequences. ‘If America pulls the plug on Israel, God will pull the plug on us,’ Graham told the crowd, framing the alliance as a moral imperative for the US. 

“The South Carolina Republican, a longtime supporter of Israel, criticized the use of the term ‘genocide’ to describe Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, arguing that the label is politically weaponized. ‘If Israel wanted to commit genocide, they could. They have the capability to do that. They choose not to,’ he said. ‘Hamas … would commit genocide in 30 seconds. They just can’t.’ Graham cast Israel as the most reliable ally of the US and emphatically defended the Jewish state as a force for good in the Middle East… 

“While Graham’s comments echoed the staunchly pro-Israel position favored by the Republican Party’s foreign policy establishment, some in the party, such as Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-SC) have called for greater scrutiny of US backing of Israel… Greene… falsely accused Israel of attempting to eradicate the Palestinian population. Greene, a conservative Republican with an extensive history of antisemitic statements, has recently accused Israel of committing a so-called ‘genocide’ in Gaza… In recent weeks, Greene has established herself as a vocal critic of Israel, breaking ranks with the rest of the Republican party…” 

Unexplained Fatalities in the Epstein Orbit

The Drudge Report referred to the following article by the National Enquirer of August 14:

“Jeffrey Epstein’s mysterious death occurred six years ago this month — but the National Enquirer has discovered 22 people in the sketchy billionaire’s orbit have also died under murky circumstances, fueling fears of a cover-up by powerful figures seeking to erase potential witnesses. From the predator’s alleged victims to house managers, lawyers, accountants, investigative journalists and pimps, the list of unexplained fatalities traces a dark money trail that leads straight to Epstein’s inner circle, sources say… 

“Financier Steven Hoffenberg confessed in a final account before his death to the Enquirer’s Doug Montero that Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, the convicted pedophile’s now-imprisoned recruiting madam, were ‘taping’… videos of sleazy VIPs with underage girls for a cabal of deep-state blackmailing power brokers… 

“Epstein’s final cellmate, Efrain ‘Stone’ Reyes, 51, died of COVID in November 2020 just weeks after talking with federal investigators probing the monstrous moneyman’s death. Reyes was transferred out of Epstein’s cell just one day before the bigwig’s death… 

“Three of Epstein’s outspoken accusers also suspiciously perished. Virginia Giuffre, 41, was found dead on April 25 in an apparent suicide, while sex slaves Carolyn Andriano, 36, and Leigh Skye Patrick, 29, died of drug overdoses in May 2023 and May 2017. The three women are not the only dead bodies related to Epstein’s days in West Palm Beach, Fla., where he was accused of abusing and pimping out dozens of young girls. 

“Despite overwhelming evidence of his purported obscene operation, Epstein received a sweetheart deal orchestrated by the feds in 2008 — and was allowed to plead guilty to two state prostitution charges and served only 13 months in a cushy county jail work-release program. 

“Joe Recarey, the Palm Beach Police detective who led the Epstein investigation and pushed officials for justice, died May 25, 2018, after a brief illness at 50. Epstein’s ex-butler Alfredo Rodriguez — who swiped his former boss’ infamous little black book and offered to sell it to an undercover FBI agent — died in December 2014 of mesothelioma at 60, after serving 13 months in federal prison on obstruction charges… 

“Two high-powered attorneys who helped Epstein skate in the West Palm Beach case have also passed away: Kenneth Starr in September 2022 at 76 after surgical complications and Roy Black, 80, who died last month at home… 

“Marvin Minsky, the MIT artificial intelligence pioneer named in Giuffre’s Epstein allegations, suffered a fatal cerebral hemorrhage in January 2016 at 88, while Ronald R. Eppinger Sr., a Miami pimp who was allegedly the first to traffic Giuffre, died at 80 in November 2006. Two investigative journalists chasing the Epstein scandal have also met their end. Former NYPD detective and Epstein book author John Connolly passed away in January 2022 at 78…  Celebrity biographer Wendy Leigh’s body was found beneath her London balcony in May 2016. Her death remains questioned as initial reports suggested suicide, but her agent emphasized the 65-year-old’s optimistic view on life… 

“Jean-Luc Brunel, 75, a French modeling agency boss awaiting trial for allegedly trafficking girls to Epstein, was found hanged inside a Paris prison cell in February 2022. Movie producer Steve Bing, 55, plunged from the 27th floor of his L.A. apartment building in June 2020 after talking to the FBI about Epstein. Mark Middleton, 59, an advisor to former President Bill Clinton with ties to Epstein, was found hanged and shot in Arkansas in May 2022 in what was ruled a suicide. 

“Thomas Bowers, 55, a head of the Deutsche Bank wealth management division that moved money for Epstein, was also found hanged inside his California home in November 2019. Epstein pal and former New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson died in his sleep in September 2023 at 75, and physicist Stephen Hawking, who is known to have visited Epstein’s island, passed away in his U.K. home in March 2018 at 76… 

“The Enquirer can also reveal unusual deaths followed Epstein even before he became a household name. The death toll began 40 years ago, when the since-disgraced mogul began working as a trusted financial advisor for tycoon Les Wexner, the L Brands founder and former owner of lingerie company Victoria’s Secret and fashion retailer Abercrombie & Fitch. Epstein’s predecessor at L Brands, 43-year-old lawyer Arthur Shapiro, was gunned down in March 1985 just weeks before he was expected to be questioned by the IRS about illegal tax shelters… Soon after Shapiro’s death, Epstein took over managing Wexner’s finances. FBI documents mention Shapiro’s unsolved murder and the sex peddler’s possible link to prime suspect Berry L. Kessler. Kessler died at age 84 in 2005 inside a Georgia federal prison after being convicted a decade earlier of masterminding two separate murder-for-hire plots unrelated to Shapiro. 

“Now, Ghislaine Maxwell — the only known living Epstein accomplice currently behind bars — was mysteriously transferred from a Florida penitentiary to a minimum-security facility in Texas that has no surveillance cameras or recordings. Maxwell’s brother Ian exclusively tells the Enquirer that his sister is ‘not suicidal,’ and experts believe the deep-state cabal wants to make sure the last remaining witness is silenced. An insider warns, ‘She’s got a bull’s-eye on her back!’” 

Some of the fatalities mentioned above appear to be rather “natural,” given the old age of those who died. Others however do appear somewhat or very suspicious. 

Mandatory Military Service in Germany? 

Politico wrote on August 14: 

“Germany’s grand coalition is headed for a fight over whether the country’s effort to increase the size of its military should include the option of compulsory military service. The conservative Christian Democrats are sparring with the center-left Social Democrats (SPD) within the ruling coalition over the shape of the country’s new military draft law… which is set to be presented in Cabinet on Aug. 27…

“The bill is Defense Minister Boris Pistorius’ attempt to address the Bundeswehr’s chronic personnel shortage without fully reintroducing mandatory conscription, which Germany suspended in 2011. Under the proposal, all draft-age men would be required to register and undergo a screening process, but only a targeted number would be called up for service. Women could volunteer… Crucially, compulsory service would only kick in if parliament votes for it in a separate decision.  

The Christian Democrats want the law to go further by introducing a mandatory service year, which would include compulsory military service as one option, alongside civilian alternatives like work in hospitals or schools. They also reject the idea of requiring a parliamentary vote to trigger conscription in a crisis, a prerequisite in the legislation… Multiple parliamentary advisers told POLITICO they doubt the bill, as drafted, could win the political backing needed to pass.” 

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

Update 1173

It Is Possible to Please God! / How Do You Worship?

On August 23, 2025, Dave Harris will present the sermonette, titled, “It Is Possible to Please God!” and Eric Rank will present the sermon, titled, “How Do You Worship?”

The live services are available, over video and audio, at http://eternalgod.org/live-services/ (12:30 pm Pacific Time; 1:30 pm Mountain Time; 2:30 pm Central Time; 3:30 pm Eastern Time; 8:30 pm Greenwich Mean Time; 9:30 pm Central European Time). Just click on Connect to Live Stream.

Back to top

Impunity Through Immunity

by Thilo Hanstein (Germany)

Many politicians of this world enjoy a form of political immunity that appears to guarantee them exemption from punishment or impunity. Due to widespread corruption and lobbying, this gives the impression that these rulers can never be held accountable.

As an ordinary citizen, this is difficult to understand. Whether it is the US, the UK, Russia, Ukraine, or Germany, the whole world is corrupt, and pretty much all politicians seem to be concerned with their own advantage or their own position and power, rather than the welfare of the people they swore to uphold when they took office.

At present, one can only shake one’s head at recent Current Events published by the Church of the Eternal God and be deeply distraught about this worldwide political corruption.

Whether it is the affair involving Jeffrey Epstein, which is causing a worldwide uproar, the wars in Russia and Ukraine, Israel and Gaza, Jordan, Iran, Iraq, China, North Korea, and many others – trillions of dollars, euros, and other currencies are being embezzled and senselessly wasted. This embezzlement of taxpayer money not only leads to further tax increases; above all, in God’s eyes, it is nothing less than a serious crime!

But none of those in power take responsibility or care about making a righteous change in their actions, as they all enjoy a certain kind of immunity. In most cases, therefore, no one can be punished for their actions! These are disgusting conditions.

Solomon wrote in Proverbs 29:4: “By justice a king gives stability to the land; but he who imposes heavy taxes ruins it” (New American Bible).

However, the Bible regards goods and money as entrusted to human beings, regardless of whether they come from God or from people. Misuse or waste is considered foolishness and sin, which demand accountability. Read “The Parable of the Unjust Steward” in Luke 16.

Diplomats also enjoy immunity from prosecution in their host country under the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. There are several well-known cases of fatal accidents or even intentional acts that fell under this immunity. The diplomats involved were never held accountable in the host country.

For example, the case of Anne Sacoolas – USA/UK (2019):

Anne Sacoolas, the wife of a US diplomat in the UK, caused a traffic accident in Northamptonshire in which 19-year-old Harry Dunn died. She left the country invoking diplomatic immunity. It was not until years later that she was convicted in her absence in the UK, but she did not serve any sentence in the UK.

Or Raymond Davis – USA/Pakistan (2011):

Davis, officially declared a diplomat, shot and killed two men in Lahore, Pakistan. The US invoked diplomatic immunity. Davis was released after paying financial compensation (“diyya,” blood money in Islamic law) and returned to the US without being punished in Pakistan.

These are just two examples of many! This immunity, behind which politicians and diplomats hide, is officially not unlimited. In most countries, it “can” be lifted by parliament if there is a serious suspicion of a criminal offense. However, the problem is often not immunity itself, but corruption, lobbying, and a lack of transparency, which in most cases lead to impunity. And as the saying goes, “Birds of a feather flock together!”

God knew that these abuses would come into the world. The following Bible passages prove it.

David wrote in his Psalms, “No king is saved by the multitude of an army; A mighty man is not delivered by great strength” (Psalm 33:16).

And Isaiah declared, “Woe to those who decree unrighteous decrees, Who write misfortune, Which they have prescribed To rob the needy of justice, And to take what is right from the poor of My people, That widows may be their prey, And that they may rob the fatherless” (Isaiah 10:1-2).

The time will come when everyone has to give account for their actions – if not in this life, then at the latest at the Great White Throne Judgment.

The Bible, the Word of God, is infallible and absolutely correct. It condemns corruption, abuse of power, and lies in the strongest terms and in fact gives warnings about the consequences. False rulers are often hypocrites and perpetrators of injustice, but the people should look to God, stand up for justice, and not participate in lawlessness.

Micah wrote down what God expects of people: “He has shown you, O man, what is good; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justly, To love mercy, And to walk humbly with your God?” (Micah 6:8).

Even if politicians enjoy immunity from prosecution, one thing is as certain as the sun rising every day: There is no immunity before God!

God’s answer for all people is actually no secret, except that most people do not want to know about it, especially today’s politicians.

Paul wrote at least three times that all people will one day have to give an account.

First in Romans 14:10-12; then in 2 Corinthians 5:10; and finally in Hebrews 4:13, where it says: “And there is no creature hidden from His sight, but all things are naked and open to the eyes of Him to whom we must give account.”

Solomon confirms these words in Ecclesiastes 12:14. And Christ admonishes us in Matthew 12:36: “But I say to you that for every idle word men may speak, they will give account of it in the day of judgment.”

It would be an illusion to believe that we will never have to give account for our actions which we commit in this life.

(Initial translation: Daniel Blasinger)

Back to top

by Norbert Link

We publish articles about Trump’s meeting with Putin in Alaska, and the overwhelmingly negative impression of that meeting [see our StandingWatch program, titled, “The Debacle of Trump’s Meeting with Putin in Alaska”); and continue with Trump’s subsequent better-received meeting with Zelensky and European leaders in Washington.

For further developments regarding the discussions concerning Russia and Ukraine, please note our newest StandingWatch program, titled, “Is There (No) Peace After All?”

We speak on ICE’s unpopular raids on “harmless” immigrants; a warning not to pull the plug on Israel; and mysterious fatalities in the Epstein orbit.

We conclude with a strong movement in Germany to institute compulsory military service.

Throughout this section, we have underlined pertinent statements in the quoted articles, for the convenience and quick overview of the reader.  

Back to top

“Boris Johnson: Trump-Putin Summit ‘Most Vomit-Inducing’ Ever” 

Upday.com wrote on August 16: 

“Boris Johnson delivered a scathing assessment of Donald Trump’s Alaska summit with Vladimir Putin, calling it ‘the most vomit-inducing episode in all the tawdry history of international diplomacy.’ The former Prime Minister condemned the red carpet treatment given to the Russian leader during their three-hour meeting… on August 15. 

“Writing in his Daily Mail column, Johnson described his visceral reaction to watching Putin welcomed on American soil. ‘It was emetic to see him applauded on the red carpet,’ he wrote, particularly criticising Putin being invited to ride in Trump’s presidential limousine – a privilege rarely extended to world leaders facing war crimes accusations. 

The former Prime Minister compared Putin directly to Hitler, arguing the Russian leader’s ‘continual lies, dissimulation and aggression’ mirror the Nazi dictator. Johnson expressed outrage at hearing Trump refer to Putin as ‘the boss’ and describe their ‘fantastic relationship’ while Ukrainian civilians face daily bombardment… 

“The former Prime Minister assessed that Putin fundamentally wants to control Ukraine and make it a vassal state of Moscow… The former Prime Minister challenged European allies to match American leadership on sanctions. ‘This is our continent. We continually demand leadership from America – and yet when we get that leadership we don’t even have the guts to follow suit,’ Johnson wrote.” 

Trump Embarrassed by Fox News 

Express wrote on August 16: 

“US President Donald Trump was embarrassed on Fox News after failing to make a deal with Vladimir Putin… Fox News’ Jacqui Henrich, a senior White House correspondent, called out the President in a live video link to the studio, in a move that is extremely rare for the news channel… 

“She said: ‘It was very unusual, atypical… the way it felt in the room was not good, it did not seem like things went well and it seemed Putin came in and steamrolled, got right into what he wanted to say and said what he wanted to say to the President and then left.’” 

Putin Got Everything… Trump Got Nothing! 

The Independent wrote on August 16: 

“Vladimir Putin wanted to stave off the threat of US sanctions, he wanted to gain more time to prosecute his war against Ukraine, he wanted to end his and Russia’s diplomatic isolation, he wanted to peel the US off from the rest of Europe, he wanted to keep Zelensky as far away from this as far as possible and he wanted to flatter his host, Donald Trump… [Putin] flew back to Moscow having achieved everything he wanted. There are no new sanctions. Donald Trump literally rolled out the red carpet for him and applauded Putin before shaking his hand warmly. The meeting took place on US soil, with all European leaders thousands of miles away…. 

“Steve Witkoff, [Trump’s] special envoy (and a man with zero diplomatic experience), who laid the ground for this summit, has been turning up in Moscow with only his girlfriend for company. At the Kremlin meetings, he has set completely alone opposite the combined might of Putin, foreign minister Sergei Lavrov and key adviser Yuri Ushakov. Witkoff had no note takers, no advisers, and was 100 per cent reliant on a Kremlin translator… 

“Should Ukraine be concerned? Should Europe be concerned about the way this summit has come about and the way it’s unfolded? They’d be stark raving mad not to be.” 

Change of Plans? 

Newsmax wrote on August 17: 

“President Donald Trump has reportedly privately indicated to European leaders he is open to offering U.S. security guarantees to Ukraine — a significant shift in his stance toward America’s role in ending the war. The change in position came after Trump’s high-profile summit in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin, where Trump sought to push Moscow toward a ceasefire, but according to Trump’s own account, Putin told him he would not stop fighting and demanded that Kyiv cede parts of eastern Ukraine in exchange for freezing the front line elsewhere…

“Despite Trump’s vow to secure a ceasefire at the risk of ‘severe consequences’ to Putin and Russia, the Alaska summit produced no ceasefire agreement and Trump has pivoted toward what he described as a ‘direct path to a peace agreement,’ aligning with Putin’s preference to negotiate final terms rather than interim pauses in fighting.” 

Complete Disappointment 

Deutsche Welle wrote on August 17: 

“A red carpet for Vladimir Putin and no results for Ukraine. The Alaska summit, which many had pinned high hopes on, turned out to be a complete disappointment from the perspective of many Ukrainians….  Oleksandr Kraiev of the Ukrainian Prism think tank told DW: ‘…The war criminal Putin came to the US and shook hands with the leader of the free world.’  According to Kraiev, apart from ‘Trump’s deference toward Putin, there were no final answers to the most important questions.’ He believes that Putin dealt with Trump ‘with surgical precision’ and told him everything Trump wanted to hear. This way, Putin got everything he wanted out of the summit.   

“According to Ivan Us from Ukraine’s Center for Foreign Policy of the National Institute for Strategic Studies, the Russian president never wanted the summit to lead to an end to the war. Instead, Putin’s goal was to legitimize himself and end his international isolation… Judging by discussions among ordinary Ukrainians, what angers them most is the red carpet that was rolled out for Putin at the US military base in Anchorage. Countless angry comments on social media leave little doubt over how this was perceived in Ukraine.” 

The reaction of the German and European press has been devastating. Headlines read like, “The nightmare of the Europeans has become true.” Hypocritical and quite silly comments by European politicians thanking Trump and saying he brought the world closer to peace only contribute to the anger of the German and European people. 

Zelensky Set Up to Fail? 

Express wrote on August 17:

“Donald Trump knows there is zero chance of a workable peace deal…, former defence committee chairman Tobias Ellwood has warned. And the Ukrainian President is being ‘set up to fail’ by his US counterpart, who was himself ‘manipulated’ by Vladimir Putin during their high-profile summit on Friday, the ex-British Army officer claimed. 

“Mr Ellwood said: ‘I see Trump deliberately setting this up to fail so he can then walk away and say, “I tried, they didn’t want to play ball.”’ The former MP… painted a picture of a summit dominated by strategic manoeuvring rather than concrete support for Ukraine.” 

No Security Guarantees? 

Fox News wrote on August 18: 

“The Russian Foreign Ministry roundly rejected the idea of NATO forces serving as peacekeepers in Ukraine, a provision sought by Ukrainian President Voldodymyr Zelensky and his European allies in U.S.-brokered peace talks. 

“‘We confirm the position that has been voiced more than once about our categorical rejection of any scenarios involving the appearance of Ukraine military contingent with the participation of NATO countries (which is fraught with an uncontrolled escalation of the conflict with unpredictable consequences),’ a foreign ministry statement reported by Russian state media outlet Ria read. President Donald Trump already suggested a European-led peacekeeping force to ensure Russia does not invade Ukraine again would be a part of peace talks. Asked if U.S. would contribute forces, Trump said: ‘[Europe is] first line of defense, because they’re there, they’re Europe, but we’re going to help them out also, we’ll be involved…’” 

There are discussions on the Ukrainian, American and European side to guarantee protection “similar to” the one afforded in Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty (which would require NATO membership). Newsmax said on August 18 that “President Donald Trump told Ukraine to give up hopes of getting back annexed Crimea or joining NATO.”  

But even Article 5 is no absolute guarantee of protection for NATO members. It states: 

“The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them . . . shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking . . . such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.” 

Brennan Center for Justice wrote on March 4, 2022:

“This language is relatively flexible. It permits each NATO member to decide for itself what action should be taken to address an armed attack on a NATO ally. It does not require any member to respond with military force, although it permits such responses as a matter of international law. A member may decide that instead of responding with force, it will send military equipment to NATO allies or impose sanctions on the aggressor.”

It may also conclude that no actions are necessary at all. 

No American Boots on the Ground 

Newsmax wrote on August 19: 

“President Donald Trump said American soldiers will not be on the ground, as long as he is president, despite pledging participation in Article 5-type security guarantees in a potential Russia-Ukraine peace deal… The ‘coalition of the willing’ – a subset of major NATO countries including France, Germany, and the U.K. – is ready to commit their troops in Ukraine to defend against Russian aggression…” 

Tentatively, a meeting is planned soon [within the next two weeks?] between Zelensky and Putin, suggested by Putin to be held in Moscow, with Trump as mediator. Reportedly, Zelensky rejected the location. According to other reports, Budapest (Hungary) could be chosen as the place for negotiations, or Geneva (Switzerland), which has promised Putin immunity if he travels to the city for peace talks.   

Who Would Send Troops?

Deutsche Welle wrote on August 21:

“‘Germany’s contribution to security guarantees has not yet been determined and this issue will be decided at the political and military levels,’ German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said on Tuesday. He added that there were still too many uncertainties…

“Denmark, Sweden, the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal and the Baltic states have also signaled their willingness to participate in a possible peacekeeping force in Ukraine.

However other European states are more cautious. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk rejects the deployment of Polish soldiers… Hungary and Slovakia are also opposed to the deployment of European troops…

“Austria and Italy are also cautious. Italian Prime minister Giorgia Meloni is particularly skeptical… [and] has so far avoided making any clear commitments….

“In any case, nothing will happen without a prior agreement with Russia. But Moscow has so far categorically rejected the deployment of NATO troops to Ukraine and there is little indication that would change.”

How the Phone Call Came About… 

Focus wrote on August 19: 

“Chancellor Friedrich Merz apparently played a decisive role in Donald Trump interrupting the Ukraine summit on Monday evening to speak with Russian President Vladimir Putin on the phone. As ‘Bild‘ reports, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky reportedly told the group about a child who had been abducted to Russia. The child’s parents knew where the child was but had no way of contacting him or bringing him back home. 

“In total, Russia is said to have abducted 19,500 children. Many of them were given up for adoption. Zelensky is also said to have given Trump a letter from his wife, Olena, to Melania Trump, in which she thanked the US President’s wife. A few days earlier, [Melania] had asked Putin in a letter to ‘protect the innocence of children.’ 

“According to the ‘Bild‘ report, Zelensky’s story is said to have deeply affected Trump. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is said to have advised the US President to call Putin immediately and confront him about it. Trump then left the room and, contrary to his plan, spoke to the Kremlin chief on the phone before the end of the summit.” 

Newsmax added on August 19: 

“Trump left the European leaders seated in the Oval Office when he went to another room to privately call Putin at 1 a.m. local time in Russia… [Reportedly, the call lasted 40 minutes.] ‘I didn’t do that in front of them, that would be disrespectful to President Putin,’ Trump said. ‘President Putin wouldn’t talk to the people from Europe – that is part of the problem.’…” 

Merz Challenges Trump 

DPA wrote on August 18: 

“German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Monday took a hard stance on the need for a ceasefire in Ukraine before a peace deal with Russia can be signed, as European leaders convened in Washington with US President Donald Trump. In a public statement in the White House, alongside Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky, Italian Prime Minister Giogia Meloni, Britain’s Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron [as well as Finnish President Alexander Stubb and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte], Merz said that ‘the path is open’ for negotiations to end the war in Ukraine. However, he warned that a trilateral meeting between Trump, Putin and Zelensky should not take place without a ceasefire in force

“‘I can’t imagine that the next meeting would take place without a ceasefire,’ Merz said. ‘Let’s try to put pressure on Russia because the credibility of these efforts we are undertaking today are depending on at least a ceasefire from the beginning of the serious negotiations.’ 

“The meeting came days after Trump hosted Putin in Alaska, after which he dropped his long-held calls for an immediate ceasefire in the war.” 

Fox News added on August 18: 

“Trump was asked about the prospect of a pre-deal ceasefire earlier Monday.  ‘I don’t think you’d need a ceasefire. If you look at the six deals that I settled this year, they were all at war – I didn’t do any ceasefires…’”

Trump’s Claims He Ended Six Wars 

The New York Post wrote on August 18: 

“President Trump repeated his frequent claim Monday that he’s ended six wars during his term in office. The White House has claimed that Trump resolved conflicts between the following countries:

lsrael and Iran less than two months ago, during which the US bombed three of the Islamic Republic’s nuclear sites; Democratic Republic of Congo and RwandaCambodia and ThailandIndia and PakistanSerbia and KosovoEgypt and Ethiopia

“The extent to which Trump played a role in resolving these disputes is debatable. Furthermore, some of the conflicts ended with fragile accords. The peace deal between the DRC and Rwanda, for example, concluded with the involvement of a key Rwanda-backed rebel group. The conflicts between Israel and Iran, as well as India and Pakistan, are frozen rather than resolved.” 

The following article gives more insight. 

Politico wrote on August 18: 

“The list of wars Trump professes to have ended starts with the clash between India and Pakistan last May… India, however, vociferously denies any U.S. involvement in bringing the fighting to a close… Actual peace would mean settling the competing claims over Kashmir, which have resulted in violent clashes and wars between the two nations for decades… And while the active fighting may have ended for now, the underlying conflict very much continues to mark relations between the two countries. 

“Next on Trump’s list of peace deals is the clash between Israel and Iran… Trump’s decision to target core parts of Iran’s nuclear program did clearly play an important role in ending Israel’s bombing strikes and Iran’s counterstrikes. But that’s a far cry from achieving lasting peace. Instead, Iran will now likely intensify its effort to build a nuclear weapon, and Israel has made clear it reserves the right to strike at any time if Iran were to rebuild its nuclear or missile program and air defenses. 

“Not long after, in late June, came a comparatively more substantial deal to end the fighting between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Brokered by the U.S. and signed in the Oval Office, the agreement requires Rwanda to withdraw its troops from the DRC within 90 days… But while this deal is, indeed, a real step toward ending the conflict, it’s important to remember that the key lies in its implementation. And on that front, news is much more mixed, as fighting between the Rwandan-backed M23 rebel group and the DRC continues unabated — in part because M23 didn’t sign on to the deal. 

“The following month then saw Trump have a hand in securing a ceasefire between Cambodia and Thailand, after violent border clashes had erupted in late July. Facing pressure from China, Malaysia and the promise of trade deals with the U.S., the two countries eventually agreed to stop shooting and halt dispatching more troops to the region. Yet again, the underlying conflict that resulted in these armed clashes remains unresolved. Cambodia and Thailand have been fighting over the demarcation of their border, including for the crucial location of centuries-old Hindu temples along their 800-kilometer frontier, for decades now… 

“Finally, earlier this month, the U.S. president presided over the conclusion of a major agreement ending the war between Azerbaijan and Armenia. Following major clashes over Nagorno-Karabakh — an enclave in Azerbaijan that Armenia had seized in 1992 and Baku regained in 2023 — much of the leg work on this agreement had been completed before Trump took office. But two sticking points remained: A demand from Azerbaijan that Armenia erase any claim to Nagorno-Karabakh from its constitution — which will require a referendum — and a transportation link between two parts of Azerbaijan that runs through Armenian territory. Under Trump, the U.S.-brokered talks did lead to an agreement, including a U.S.-leased roadway connecting the two areas of Azerbaijan — a substantial deal and a real accomplishment. But, again, implementation will be key. 

“Nonetheless, Trump’s boast of ending six wars in six months is a lot less than meets the eye. The fact is, even if he had been completely successful in ending these wars, his record would still be overshadowed by his failure to end the two wars he actually vowed to solve— the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. Far from ending them in 24 hours, as he boasted he would do during his reelection campaign, the situation in both has worsened since Trump’s return: In Gaza, the U.S. leader has essentially given the Israeli government a green light to occupy the strip, washing his hands of any effort to secure an end to the fighting. Meanwhile, in Ukraine, he sought to move the peace process forward by meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska — only to come up empty-handed and seemingly more in sync with Moscow than Kyiv…” 

The subsequent meeting in Washington turned out to be much better. However, Trump (and others) keep talking about a land swap… that Ukraine will have to give land to Russia… a demand which Ukraine had continuously rejected. 

Russia and China Demand a Say on Security Guarantees

Daily Mail wrote on August 21:

“Ukraine peace talks were in disarray on Wednesday after Russia effectively demanded Moscow and Beijing get a veto on any security guarantees…

“Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Moscow must be part of the security guarantees. Putin’s man also said these ‘should be provided on an equal basis with the participation of countries such as China, the United States, the UK and France’. Lavrov added: ‘I’m sure in the West they understand that seriously discussing security issues without Russia is a utopia, it’s a road to nowhere.’

“[It would mean] none of the guarantors would be allowed to defend Ukraine from Russia unless they all agreed, including China and Russia.”

Trump’s Confession

 The Daily Mail reported on August 19: 

“President Donald Trump talked about his desire for eternal salvation as he discussed ongoing efforts to negotiate a lasting peace between Russia and Ukraine. 

“He invoked the Bible during an interview on Fox & Friends one day after hosting historic meetings at the White House to broker peace between the countries. ‘I want to get to heaven if possible. I’m hearing I’m not doing well. I hear I’m at the bottom of the totem pole,’ Trump said.”

ICE Deportations of the Wrong People Harmful to the US 

The New York Post wrote on August 17: 

“President Donald Trump delivered on his key campaign promise: Securing the border. Yet the only thing falling faster than illegal crossings has been his approval rating on immigration. The problem: Instead of building on his win at the border with more popular arrests of criminal threats inside the country, the administration is going after migrants indiscriminately.  

“Democrats can’t deny it: The border crisis is over. Border Patrol arrests have fallen nearly 90% since December to near-record lows. Nonetheless, only 40% of voters approved of the president’s handling of immigration… while 55% disapproved… Of course, people don’t actually want more illegal immigration. Polls consistently show that the president is the most trusted on the border. Instead, it’s the deportations from within the United States driving the discontent…  

“That doesn’t mean voters back the other side — 84% disagree with Democrats who want to suspend deportations completely… But Trump emphasized that he would prioritize ending ‘sanctuary and protection for dangerous criminals’ — the position of 81% of voters. Unfortunately, most voters don’t believe the president is doing that right now. 

“Even as late as June, voters told CBS News they thought that the president was prioritizing ‘dangerous criminals’ over peaceful immigrants 53%-47%. By mid-July, it was 44%-56% the other way — an 18 point swing in a month. What happened? Voters started to see how the priorities shifted… agents were instructed in late May to focus on ‘quantity over quality’ to meet a 3,000-per-day ‘goal’ set by the White House. ICE was advised to target people looking for work at Home Depot and to raid businesses in industries likely to employ illegal workers. 

“Rather than scooping up violent criminals recklessly sent back to the streets by New York City…, ICE is arresting immigrants who are helping power the Trump economy. Since the White House ordered the change, there has been a dramatic escalation in arrests of people without criminal records. In June, the number of immigrants arrested without criminal convictions was 1,100% higher than it was even in 2017 during the first Trump term: nearly 6,000 per week. 

“Yet there are still half a million illegal immigrants with criminal convictions out there to remove — and ICE should locate them before spending its time and resources on workers. It’s common sense: ICE agents told The Post that the policy was ‘leading them to leave some dangerous criminal illegal migrants on the streets.’   

“Setting aside politics and crime, Trump has already publicly acknowledged there’s an economic downside to these non-criminal deportations. ‘Our aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long-time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,’ he said in June, referencing farms, hotels, and leisure businesses.  The president is correct. Besides the border, the president’s other primary election issue was inflation. And immigrants reduce inflation — not, as critics claim, by depressing wages for American workers, but by increasing production of goods and services. When supply decreases, prices go up for consumers, as we painfully saw throughout the pandemic… 

“Whatever the immigration politics are, Trump’s midterm success will ultimately depend most on his economic outcomes. Americans re-elected him because they remember his first term before the pandemic as a period of stable wage and job growth — but random mass deportations are both politically unpopular and economically destabilizing. Although the president has promised ‘changes are coming’ on deportations, none have yet occurred….”

In addition, Donald Trump promised to prioritize arrests, detentions and deportations of dangerous criminal illegal migrants. This promise has been clearly broken by Stephen Miller, Kristi Noem, Tom Homan and others. 

Don’t Pull the Plug on Israel 

The Algemeiner wrote on August 15: 

“US Sen. Lindsey Graham delivered a forceful defense of the US-Israel alliance at a South Carolina Republican Party meeting on Wednesday, warning that withdrawing American support for the Jewish state would carry both strategic and spiritual consequences. ‘If America pulls the plug on Israel, God will pull the plug on us,’ Graham told the crowd, framing the alliance as a moral imperative for the US. 

“The South Carolina Republican, a longtime supporter of Israel, criticized the use of the term ‘genocide’ to describe Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, arguing that the label is politically weaponized. ‘If Israel wanted to commit genocide, they could. They have the capability to do that. They choose not to,’ he said. ‘Hamas … would commit genocide in 30 seconds. They just can’t.’ Graham cast Israel as the most reliable ally of the US and emphatically defended the Jewish state as a force for good in the Middle East… 

“While Graham’s comments echoed the staunchly pro-Israel position favored by the Republican Party’s foreign policy establishment, some in the party, such as Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-SC) have called for greater scrutiny of US backing of Israel… Greene… falsely accused Israel of attempting to eradicate the Palestinian population. Greene, a conservative Republican with an extensive history of antisemitic statements, has recently accused Israel of committing a so-called ‘genocide’ in Gaza… In recent weeks, Greene has established herself as a vocal critic of Israel, breaking ranks with the rest of the Republican party…” 

Unexplained Fatalities in the Epstein Orbit

The Drudge Report referred to the following article by the National Enquirer of August 14:

“Jeffrey Epstein’s mysterious death occurred six years ago this month — but the National Enquirer has discovered 22 people in the sketchy billionaire’s orbit have also died under murky circumstances, fueling fears of a cover-up by powerful figures seeking to erase potential witnesses. From the predator’s alleged victims to house managers, lawyers, accountants, investigative journalists and pimps, the list of unexplained fatalities traces a dark money trail that leads straight to Epstein’s inner circle, sources say… 

“Financier Steven Hoffenberg confessed in a final account before his death to the Enquirer’s Doug Montero that Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, the convicted pedophile’s now-imprisoned recruiting madam, were ‘taping’… videos of sleazy VIPs with underage girls for a cabal of deep-state blackmailing power brokers… 

“Epstein’s final cellmate, Efrain ‘Stone’ Reyes, 51, died of COVID in November 2020 just weeks after talking with federal investigators probing the monstrous moneyman’s death. Reyes was transferred out of Epstein’s cell just one day before the bigwig’s death… 

“Three of Epstein’s outspoken accusers also suspiciously perished. Virginia Giuffre, 41, was found dead on April 25 in an apparent suicide, while sex slaves Carolyn Andriano, 36, and Leigh Skye Patrick, 29, died of drug overdoses in May 2023 and May 2017. The three women are not the only dead bodies related to Epstein’s days in West Palm Beach, Fla., where he was accused of abusing and pimping out dozens of young girls. 

“Despite overwhelming evidence of his purported obscene operation, Epstein received a sweetheart deal orchestrated by the feds in 2008 — and was allowed to plead guilty to two state prostitution charges and served only 13 months in a cushy county jail work-release program. 

“Joe Recarey, the Palm Beach Police detective who led the Epstein investigation and pushed officials for justice, died May 25, 2018, after a brief illness at 50. Epstein’s ex-butler Alfredo Rodriguez — who swiped his former boss’ infamous little black book and offered to sell it to an undercover FBI agent — died in December 2014 of mesothelioma at 60, after serving 13 months in federal prison on obstruction charges… 

“Two high-powered attorneys who helped Epstein skate in the West Palm Beach case have also passed away: Kenneth Starr in September 2022 at 76 after surgical complications and Roy Black, 80, who died last month at home… 

“Marvin Minsky, the MIT artificial intelligence pioneer named in Giuffre’s Epstein allegations, suffered a fatal cerebral hemorrhage in January 2016 at 88, while Ronald R. Eppinger Sr., a Miami pimp who was allegedly the first to traffic Giuffre, died at 80 in November 2006. Two investigative journalists chasing the Epstein scandal have also met their end. Former NYPD detective and Epstein book author John Connolly passed away in January 2022 at 78…  Celebrity biographer Wendy Leigh’s body was found beneath her London balcony in May 2016. Her death remains questioned as initial reports suggested suicide, but her agent emphasized the 65-year-old’s optimistic view on life… 

“Jean-Luc Brunel, 75, a French modeling agency boss awaiting trial for allegedly trafficking girls to Epstein, was found hanged inside a Paris prison cell in February 2022. Movie producer Steve Bing, 55, plunged from the 27th floor of his L.A. apartment building in June 2020 after talking to the FBI about Epstein. Mark Middleton, 59, an advisor to former President Bill Clinton with ties to Epstein, was found hanged and shot in Arkansas in May 2022 in what was ruled a suicide. 

“Thomas Bowers, 55, a head of the Deutsche Bank wealth management division that moved money for Epstein, was also found hanged inside his California home in November 2019. Epstein pal and former New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson died in his sleep in September 2023 at 75, and physicist Stephen Hawking, who is known to have visited Epstein’s island, passed away in his U.K. home in March 2018 at 76… 

“The Enquirer can also reveal unusual deaths followed Epstein even before he became a household name. The death toll began 40 years ago, when the since-disgraced mogul began working as a trusted financial advisor for tycoon Les Wexner, the L Brands founder and former owner of lingerie company Victoria’s Secret and fashion retailer Abercrombie & Fitch. Epstein’s predecessor at L Brands, 43-year-old lawyer Arthur Shapiro, was gunned down in March 1985 just weeks before he was expected to be questioned by the IRS about illegal tax shelters… Soon after Shapiro’s death, Epstein took over managing Wexner’s finances. FBI documents mention Shapiro’s unsolved murder and the sex peddler’s possible link to prime suspect Berry L. Kessler. Kessler died at age 84 in 2005 inside a Georgia federal prison after being convicted a decade earlier of masterminding two separate murder-for-hire plots unrelated to Shapiro. 

“Now, Ghislaine Maxwell — the only known living Epstein accomplice currently behind bars — was mysteriously transferred from a Florida penitentiary to a minimum-security facility in Texas that has no surveillance cameras or recordings. Maxwell’s brother Ian exclusively tells the Enquirer that his sister is ‘not suicidal,’ and experts believe the deep-state cabal wants to make sure the last remaining witness is silenced. An insider warns, ‘She’s got a bull’s-eye on her back!’” 

Some of the fatalities mentioned above appear to be rather “natural,” given the old age of those who died. Others however do appear somewhat or very suspicious. 

Mandatory Military Service in Germany? 

Politico wrote on August 14: 

“Germany’s grand coalition is headed for a fight over whether the country’s effort to increase the size of its military should include the option of compulsory military service. The conservative Christian Democrats are sparring with the center-left Social Democrats (SPD) within the ruling coalition over the shape of the country’s new military draft law… which is set to be presented in Cabinet on Aug. 27…

“The bill is Defense Minister Boris Pistorius’ attempt to address the Bundeswehr’s chronic personnel shortage without fully reintroducing mandatory conscription, which Germany suspended in 2011. Under the proposal, all draft-age men would be required to register and undergo a screening process, but only a targeted number would be called up for service. Women could volunteer… Crucially, compulsory service would only kick in if parliament votes for it in a separate decision.  

The Christian Democrats want the law to go further by introducing a mandatory service year, which would include compulsory military service as one option, alongside civilian alternatives like work in hospitals or schools. They also reject the idea of requiring a parliamentary vote to trigger conscription in a crisis, a prerequisite in the legislation… Multiple parliamentary advisers told POLITICO they doubt the bill, as drafted, could win the political backing needed to pass.” 

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

Back to top

Whom did the Ancients give God’s tithe to prior to Moses and the Levitical tithing system?

Even though the Bible records that some in the Old Testament paid God’s tithe before Moses, there are those who claim that there was no obligation to pay the tithe before Moses, and it only became an obligation when the Levitical tithing system was instituted under Moses. They also claim that the tithing system was only instituted for Israel (some even say, the Jews, confusing the house of Israel with the house of Judah), and that any obligation to pay tithe ended at the time when Israel and Judah went into captivity. They say that in any event, there is no tithing obligation for New Testament Christians as Christ came to abolish the commandment to pay tithe.

All of these assumptions are wrong.

We say the following in our free booklet, “Tithing — Today?” 

“One of the ancients who honored God with tithing was righteous Abraham. We are told that Abraham [Abram] gave a tithe of his income to the high priest, Melchizedek. We read in Genesis 14:20 that Abraham gave him ‘a tithe [or one-tenth] of all.’ In the book of Hebrews, it is again mentioned that Abraham gave Melchizedek ‘a tenth of the spoils’ (Hebrews 7:4)…

“So then, why did Abraham give the high priest the tithe? Had Abraham done it before, or was this the first time? And if it was the first time, how did this thought enter his mind?

“The context of both passages in Genesis 14 and Hebrews 7 shows that Abraham practiced tithing as a way of life. We read that Abraham kept God’s ‘charge.’ We also find this statement from God Himself regarding Abraham, that ‘Abraham obeyed My voice and kept My charge, My commandments, My statutes, and My laws’ (Genesis 26:5). In other words, Abraham was OBEDIENT TO GOD IN EVERYTHING, and that included tithing in accordance with God’s instructions.

“We also read of the patriarch, Jacob, who became obedient to God’s instructions on tithing, as well. When he fled for his life from his brother Esau, God appeared to him in a dream. When Jacob awoke, he made a vow, stating, ‘… of all that You give me I will surely give a tenth [or tithe] to You’ (Genesis 28:22)… Again, how did Jacob know that God required this of him? The obvious answer is that Abraham, his grandfather, and Isaac, his father, had taught him. However, Jacob had not yet begun to tithe, because he had not yet accepted God as his God. Rather, he said, ‘If God will be with me, and keep me in this way that I am going, and give me bread to eat and clothing to put on, so that I come back to my father’s house in peace, THEN the LORD shall be my God’ (Genesis 28:20–21)…”

We will later come back to the question as to whom Jacob (and Isaac) gave the tithe. In the case of Abraham (Abram), we already read that he gave it to the high priest “Melchizedek.”

We explain in our above-quoted booklet who Melchizedek was.

“We read in Hebrews 7:4–8: ‘Now consider how great this man was, to whom even the patriarch Abraham gave a tenth of the spoils. And indeed, those who are of the sons of Levi, who receive the priesthood, have a commandment to receive tithes from the people according to the law, that is, from their brethren, though they have come from the loins of Abraham; but he whose genealogy is not derived from them received tithes from Abraham and blessed him who had the promises. Now beyond all contradiction the lesser is blessed by the better. Here mortal men receive tithes, but there he receives them, of whom it is witnessed that he lives.’

“Notice, too, Hebrews 7:28: ‘For the law [regulating the collection of tithes through the Levites] appoints as high priests men who have weaknesses, but the word of the oath, which came after the law [pertaining to the Levites], appoints the Son who has been perfected forever.’

“‘Christ, who is a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek’ (verse 17), was none other than Melchizedek Himself. Melchizedek is described as the ‘king of peace,’ without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but made like the Son of God, remain[ing] a priest continually’ (verses 2–3). It is said about Melchizedek that he ‘receives them [tithes], of whom it is witnessed that he LIVES’ (verse 8).

“The ONLY human who has been resurrected from death to ETERNAL LIFE is Jesus Christ… Melchizedek and Jesus Christ are one and the same person! We read that Melchizedek was without beginning—and so was Christ, the Eternal One…”

It was Christ, in the person of Melchizedek, who appeared to Abraham as the priest of the Most High—God the Father—to receive the tithe from Abraham. This was hardly the first, nor the only time, that Abraham had paid the tithe, as we have seen before; nor, that he paid it only on that occasion to Melchizedek.

We read that Melchizedek was called “king of Salem” and “king of righteousness (Hebrews 7:2). He actually ruled in Salem or Jerusalem as the King of Jerusalem and the King of Peace. We do not know for long He ruled there, and when His rule began or ended, but we do know that He ruled as king when He met Abraham, and undoubtedly longer than that. This does not mean that Christ had become a Man of flesh and blood, but He did manifest Himself as a Man.

We say more about Melchizedek in our free booklet “God Is… Our Destiny” (Chapter 19):

“We read in Genesis 14:18–21 that Christ, as Melchizedek, appeared to Abraham, then called Abram, who gave Him the tithe of everything. Hebrews 7 confirms that Melchizedek was indeed Jesus Christ who lived at that time as High Priest among the people (compare verses 3, 8). He had not become a Man, but He lived for a while ‘as’ a man; that is, He manifested Himself as a man. Abram knew who Melchizedek was…

“… later in Genesis 18…, Christ and two angels ‘appeared’ to Abraham as ‘men’ (verse 2) when they were about to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah. They ate and spoke with him (Genesis 18:1–15). But this does not mean that they actually WERE men—that is, flesh and blood human beings. They just manifested themselves AS human beings. Abraham knew right away that one of the three was Christ, calling Him ‘My Lord’ in verse 3 (compare also verses 27, 30, 32). The word is Adonai, which Abraham used in reference to God (compare Genesis 15:2). He recognized Christ, having seen Him before when He appeared to Him as Melchizedek. (In passing, the word Adonai is actually a plural word, meaning ‘my lords’; the singular form is adon. This is another proof that Abraham knew that God consists of more than one Person.)…”

When Christ came to this earth as a Man and died for us, the tithing obligation was changed, but not in the sense that it was no longer obligatory to tithe, but in the sense that Levites would no longer collect the tithe; rather, Jesus Christ would receive the tithe again, as He had received it before, prior to Moses, in the Person of Melchizedek. We are told, in the book of Hebrews, that with Christ’s death and resurrection, a change in the ADMINISTRATION of the tithing obligation occurred (compare Hebrews 7:11-12).

As it was prior to Moses, so it is today: God’s tithe, holy to Him, is to be paid directly to Christ. As Christ is the Head of the Body, His Church, God’s tithe must be paid to His Church.

That the obligation to pay God’s tithe did not cease can be seen in the end-time prophecy of the book of Malachi. We say in our above-mentioned booklet “Tithing – Today?”:

“God inspired [Malachi] to record His stirring warning in Malachi 3:8–10: ‘“Will a man rob God? Yet you have robbed Me! But you say, “In what way have we robbed You?” In tithes and offerings. You are cursed with a curse, For you have robbed Me, Even this whole nation. Bring all the tithes into the storehouse, That there may be food in My house, And try Me now in this,’ Says the LORD of hosts, ‘If I will not open for you the windows of heaven And pour out for you such blessing That there will not be room enough to receive it.’”

“… Although recorded in the Old Testament, the statement refers equally, if not more so, to God’s New Testament Church, as well as to all of mankind just prior to Christ’s return… The entire context of the book of Malachi has to do with OUR immediate future!

“For instance, we read in Malachi 4:1–4: “‘For behold, the day is coming, Burning like an oven, And all the proud, yes, all who do wickedly will be stubble. And the day which is coming shall burn them up,’ Says the LORD of hosts, ‘That will leave them neither root nor branch. But to you who fear My name The Sun of Righteousness shall arise With healing in His wings; And you shall go out And grow fat like stall-fed calves. You shall trample the wicked, For they shall be ashes under the soles of your feet On the day that I do this,’ Says the LORD of hosts. ‘Remember the Law of Moses, My servant, Which I commanded him in Horeb for all Israel, With the statutes and judgments.’”

“This is a challenge God extends to us today! Malachi’s prophecies apply to us today AND to our immediate future! The Law of Moses—with its statutes and judgments—includes God’s law to tithe. God says to remember this and to cease from robbing Him—cease neglecting to tithe to Him His HOLY tithe! To those who obey Him, God says in Malachi 3:17: “‘They shall be Mine,’ says the LORD of hosts, ‘On the day that I make them My jewels. And I will spare them As a man spares his own son who serves him.’ Then you shall again discern Between the righteous and the wicked, Between the one who serves God And one who does not serve Him.’”

“Jesus Christ confirmed that the tithing law was still in effect at the time of His first coming. While emphasizing that tithing is not an end in itself, He nevertheless endorsed its validity: ‘Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have neglected the weightier matters of the law: justice and mercy and faith. These you ought to have done, without leaving the others undone’ (Matthew 23:23). Note that Christ talked about ‘paying’ tithes, even confirming that this OUGHT TO BE DONE!”

Returning to Abraham and Jacob, we saw that Abraham paid the tithe directly to Melchizedek. Jacob said that he would pay the tithe if he would be blessed by God. But to WHOM would he pay it? We read in Genesis 28 that he came to Bethel and had a dream in which he saw the LORD (Jesus Christ) and His angels (verses 12-15). The LORD spoke to him in the dream by stating that He was the “LORD God of Abraham and of Isaak” (verse 13) and He promised him protection and that He would bring him back to this place in the future (verse 15). When Jabob woke up, he recognized that “the LORD is in this place and I did not know it” (verse 16). He also said that if I were to come back to his father’s house in peace, then the LORD (Jesus Christ) would be his God, and “of all You give me I surely give a tenth TO YOU” (verses 21-22).

In other words, he promised to pay the tithe to the LORD—apparently in the Person of the High Priest Melchizedek, who was obviously still ruling by that time as the King of Jerusalem. He must have known this, as there was no Levitical priesthood yet, and to state that he would give the tithe to the LORD would make little sense, unless he knew how to do this. He knew that Abraham, his grandfather, had given the tithe to Melchizedek, and apparently also his father Isaac had done so, and so he, Jacob, would do the same.

We find another interesting prophecy in Isaiah 1:26 about Jerusalem or Zion, after Christ has returned to earth, where we read: “I will restore your judges as at the first, And your counselors as at the beginning. Afterward you shall be called the city of righteousness, the faithful city.”

Up until the time of David, Jerusalem was not even in the hands of Israel and Judah, so the reference to righteous judges could hardly be applied to the Jebusites who possessed the city at the time of David which he conquered. Applying this to the time of the Judges or Moses, as some suggest, would make little sense either—at that time, Jerusalem was not ruled or judged by the Israelites.

The Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers points out:

“The city of righteousness… There is possibly an allusive reference to the idea embodied in the [name] of Melchizedek… (Genesis 14:18; Hebrews 7:2) as connected with Jerusalem. So in Jeremiah 33:16 the ideal city, no less than the ideal king, is to be called Jehovah Tsidkenu (‘the LORD our righteousness’).”

So, it appears that the reference in Isaiah 1:26 is to Melchizedek when He ruled Salem or Jersualem, apparently with some of His righteous angels, who could be described as “judges” or “counselors” (compare Daniel 4:13, 17; 1 Kings 22:19-20; Revelation 4:4). And it would have been Melchizedek to whom Abraham, Isaac and Jacob regularly brought their tithe and offerings. But in the future, it will be the born-again members of the God Family who will rule under Christ as judges and priests over angels (Revelation 5:10; 20:4, 6; Hebrews 2:5, 8; 1 Corinthians 6:3), and the people will bring their tithes and offerings to them to be used for righteous purposes.

Lead Writer: Norbert Link

Back to top

Preaching the Gospel and Feeding the Flock

compiled by Dave Harris

“Is There (No) Peace After All?” is the title of the newest StandingWatch program, presented by Evangelist Norbert Link. Here is the summary:

The meeting in Washington between Trump, Zelensky, and European leaders was far more promising than the previous meeting between Trump and Putin in Alaska. But Russia would now have to play along, which it clearly isn’t. It categorically rejects the security guarantees for Ukraine, proposed by Trump and the Europeans, or combines them with demands that are absolutely laughable. Trump is now seemingly losing his patience with Putin. Where will all this lead?

“Gibt es doch (keinen) Frieden?” is the title of a new AufPostenStehen, presented by Norbert Link. This German program covers the same information as described above.

“The Debacle of Trump’s Meeting with Putin in Alaska,” is the title of a new StandingWatch program, presented by Evangelist Norbert Link. Here is the summary:

Why do we say that the meeting was a debacle? Well, what did it accomplish? What was agreed upon? Even though we haven’t heard much about the exact nature of a deal, in an interview subsequent to the meeting, Trump let slip a few things, which were in favor of Russia and which Ukraine would never agree to. But most importantly, what does the BIBLE say about the future of Russia and Ukraine, as well as Europe and the USA?

“Das Debakel von Trumps Treffen mit Putin in Alaska,” is the title of a new AufPostenStehen program, presented by Norbert Link. This German program covers the same information as described above.

“Gottes Warnung an wahre und falsche Christen,” is the title of this Sabbath’s German sermon, presented by Norbert Link. Title in English: “God’s Warning to True and False Christians.”

“Wertschätzung” last Sabbath’s German sermonette by Marc Völler, is now posted. Title in English: “Appreciation,”

“Halte die Treue,” last Sabbath’s German sermon presented by Thilo Hanstein, is now posted. Title in English: “Keep Loyalty.”

“God of Peace — Peace of God,” last Sabbath’s sermonette presented by Eric Rank, is now posted. Here is the summary:

The world we live in constantly threatens to steal away our peace of mind and peace between one another. God offers us a sure path to experience lasting peace if we have the courage and faith to follow Him. The God of peace provides us with the opportunity to obtain the peace of God.

“Your Christianity–Counterfeit or Real?” last Sabbath’s sermon presented by Dave Harris, is now posted. Here is the summary:

It is the largest of the world’s religions, and 2.4 billion people claim to be Christians! But is this the Christianity of the Bible or a counterfeit? Is your Christian faith real, or have you been deceived?

Back to top


How This Work is Financed

This Update is an official publication by the ministry of the Church of the Eternal God in the United States of America; the Church of God, a Christian Fellowship in Canada; and the Global Church of God in the United Kingdom.

Editorial Team: Norbert Link, Dave Harris, Rene Messier, Brian Gale, Johanna Link, Eric Rank, Michael Link, Anna Link, Kalon Mitchell, Manuela Mitchell, Dawn Thompson

Technical Team: Eric Rank, Shana Rank

Our activities and literature, including booklets, weekly updates, sermons on CD are provided free of charge. They are made possible by the tithes, offerings and contributions of Church members and others who have elected to support this Work.

While we do not solicit the general public for funds, contributions are gratefully welcomed and are tax-deductible in the U.S. and Canada.

Donations can be sent to the following addresses:

United States: Church of the Eternal God, P.O. Box 270519, San Diego, CA 92198

Canada: Church of God, ACF, Box 1480, Summerland, B.C. V0H 1Z0

United Kingdom: Global Church of God, PO Box 44, MABLETHORPE, LN12 9AN, United Kingdom

God of Peace — Peace of God/ Your Christianity–Counterfeit or Real?

On August 16, 2025, Eric Rank will present the sermonette, titled, “God of Peace — Peace of God” and Dave Harris will present the sermon, titled, “Your Christianity–Counterfeit or Real?

The live services are available, over video and audio, at http://eternalgod.org/live-services/ (12:30 pm Pacific Time; 1:30 pm Mountain Time; 2:30 pm Central Time; 3:30 pm Eastern Time; 8:30 pm Greenwich Mean Time; 9:30 pm Central European Time). Just click on Connect to Live Stream.

This Week in the News

Trump Repeats Controversial Claim 

The Independent wrote on August 12: 

“President Donald Trump raged against Goldman Sachs, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell and even his former Treasury secretary as he defended his global reciprocal tariffs – and continued to promote claims its countries, not consumers, are footing the bill… It has become a long refrain for the president that others pay tariffs, despite the fact that the cost is typically passed on to consumers. 

“Goldman Sachs released a report last week warning that U.S companies ate 64 percent of tariffs and consumers ate 22 percent of tariffs, which contradicts Trump’s claims about tariffs costing consumers. A Yale Budget Lab study found that Trump’s trade war would cost consumers about 1.8 percent more in the short term and the effective tariff rate would be 18.6 percent, the highest since the Great Depression… 

“Last week, Trump’s massive reciprocal tariffs resumed after he had initially paused them. Earlier this week, Trump said that he would once again pause tariffs on China for 90 days.”   

Trump’s repeated claims that consumers don’t have to pay for the tariffs are demonstrably false. Note the next articles as well. 

Consumers Will Have to Pay! 

The National Post wrote on August 8: 

“Last Friday, Trump imposed a 35 per cent tariff on Canadian goods not compliant with the Canada-US-Mexico Agreement, adding to existing high duties on steel, aluminum, autos, and copper… Now, those industries must pass increased costs along to U.S. buyers, pushing prices higher on items ranging from groceries and clothing to cars and farm equipment… 

“‘It definitely is indicative of a weakened economy, an economy that’s not acting in a robust fashion. I’ve all along felt like there’s a lag between tariffs and actual economic downturn,’ Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, a Republican, told the press this week, adding that retailers have told him they think they will have to raise prices this fall… Kansas Sen. Jerry Moran also warned this week of rising costs for consumers and businesses…. 

“Earlier this year, Mitch McConnell, a Republican senator from Kentucky, also railed against Trump’s tariffs. ‘With so much at stake globally, the last thing we need is to pick fights with the very friends with whom we should be working with to protect against China’s predatory and unfair trade practices,’ he said in a statement.” 

Most Republicans are afraid to oppose Trump publicly, even though they sense the dangers for the 2026 midterm elections. 

Prices Are Up Because of Tariffs, But…? 

Mediaite wrote on August 10: 

“Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC) acknowledged that prices were up as a result of President Donald Trump’s tariffs, yet emphasized that it’s ‘for the good of the country’ in a Saturday appearance on Fox Report With Jon Scott.  

“Host Jon Scott asked the congressman… to explain a Fox poll showing only a 55% approval rating for Trump on the economy. ‘I think a lot of people are seeing higher prices,’ said Norman. ‘Our family’s in the construction business, and we get a lot of our timber from Canada and other countries. Yes, it’s higher. Steel prices are up, but it’s for the good of the country.’ ‘Should we expect high prices for a short time? Yes,’ he continued….” 

How about that twisted “logic”?

The Trade War Isn’t Over 

MSN wrote on August 8: 

“Trump, after saying for months that a trade deal with India was imminent, imposed a 25% levy on the longstanding ally, then doubled it less than a week later. The stated reason was purchases of Russian oil, though he didn’t do the same thing to China, an equally heavy buyer… 

Japanese media reported that their government’s understanding of tariff calculations appears to be very different than the Trump administration’s understanding… 

“The German finance minister reportedly blasted [the] EU deal and set off for Washington to try to renegotiate parts of it, before any of it was even finalized. The Swiss president also went to Washington to deal with her own surprisingly heavy tariffs, and left empty-handed…

“The bottom line: We’re only approaching the end of the beginning.” 

“Next Blow” Against Switzerland: Trump Imposes Tariffs on Gold Bars 

Focus wrote on August 9: 

“As the ‘Financial Times’ reports, gold bars that weigh more than one kilo will in future be subject to tariffs when imported into the USA. These are also at 39 percent, a previous exception no longer applies. One kilo gold bars is the most traded type of gold and make up the majority of Swiss gold imports into the USA… [Now] additional tariffs amounting to 24 billion dollars would be incurred. 

“The country with a population of nine million lives from exports, the USA is the most important market with an 18 percent share last year… Since Thursday, US tariffs have been higher in Switzerland than in almost any other country… The Swiss tech industry association, Swissmem, speaks of a ‘horror scenario’. ‘If this horrendous tariff burden persists, the Swiss tech industry’s export business to the USA will effectively be dead…'” 

Immigration Raids Continue 

Democracy Now wrote on August 11: 

“… immigration raids and arrests continue to terrorize communities across the United States… 

“In Los Angeles, nurse and community activist Amanda Trebach [a US citizen] was released from federal custody this weekend without criminal charges, after she was violently arrested early Friday morning while recording the operations of federal immigration agents in the area… ICE has faced widespread backlash over the arrest of community advocates who have been swept up while documenting raids, including U.S. citizens.” 

How Trump Fights Crime and Homelessness 

The Associated Press wrote on August 11: 

“Trump said Monday he’s taking over Washington’s police department and activating 800 members of the National Guard in the hopes of reducing crime, even as city officials stressed crime is already falling in the nation’s capital… He said he was declaring a public safety emergency and his administration would be removing homeless encampments… adding he’d also be ‘getting rid of the slums.’… 

“Trump invoked Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act in an executive order to declare a ‘crime emergency’ so his administration could take over the city’s police force… Trump has emphasized the removal of Washington’s homeless population, though it was unclear where the thousands of people would go… Jesse Rabinowitz, [the campaign and communication director for the National Homelessness Law Center and an] advocate for homeless people, called Trump’s plan ‘fascist’ and a ‘waste’ of resources. He said the move wasn’t about safety… ‘If Donald Trump wanted to keep D.C. safe, he would fund housing and support…’ 

“Police statistics show homicides, robberies and burglaries are down this year when compared with this time in 2024. Overall, violent crime is down 26% compared with this time a year ago.” 

Legalizing Medical Marijuana? 

The New York Post wrote on August 9: 

”President Donald Trump  is reportedly eyeing reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug, a move that could expand medical marijuana research and ease industry restrictions… Former President Joe Biden was considering such a classification change that would have also made it easier to buy and sell weed before losing last year’s presidential election to Trump… 

“Trump last year backed a ballot measure to legalize recreational marijuana in Florida, which narrowly failed to secure the 60% of voters’ support it needed to pass. Weed has been legal in New York for medical purposes since 2016 and recreational purposes since 2021.” 

The reclassification of medical marijuana has been long overdue.  

Invasion of Flesh-Eating Flies Imminent? 

Ars Technica wrote on August 8: 

“Texas is gearing up for war as a savage, flesh-eating fly appears poised for a US invasion and is expanding its range of victims…  

“In Colombia, endemic screwworms have apparently grown bolder in their taste for flesh…  it’s unclear why the fly has suddenly emerged in mountain tapirs, which resemble wild pigs with trunks…”

Meeting in Alaska??? 

The Independent wrote on August 9: 

“President Donald Trump is set to meet with Vladimir Putin in Alaska [on August 15]… Critics pointed out that Russia once laid claim to the state of Alaska at the beginning of the 1770s—where they mercilessly exploited Alaskan natives to hunt fur for the Russians—and nationalists have long wanted to take it back. Alaska was purchased from the Russians by the U.S. for a sum of $7.2 million in 1867—the equivalent of between $129 million and $153.5 million today. 

“‘Trump has chosen to host Putin in a part of the former Russian Empire. Wonder if he knows that Russian nationalists claim that losing Alaska, like Ukraine, was a raw deal for Moscow that needs to be corrected,’ said Michael McFaul, a professor of political science at Stanford University and former. U.S. ambassador to Russia. ‘Let’s all hope that Putin doesn’t ask to take Alaska home with him as a souvenir, or Trump might give that away too,’ political commentator David Frum said in a post on X… 

“Trump’s former national security adviser-turned foe, John Bolton, said the move reminded him of a blunder the president allegedly nearly made in his first term. ‘This is not quite as bad as Trump inviting the Taliban to Camp David to talk about the peace negotiations in Afghanistan… it certainly reminds one of that.’… 

“Putin is wanted by the ICC on a warrant dating back to March 2023 for alleged involvement in the abduction of children from Ukraine… At least 19,000 Ukrainian children are thought to have been kidnapped and taken to Russia since the invasion began in February 2022, although Ukrainian officials say the total is probably far higher… Trump has also publicly blamed Zelensky—rather than Putin – for starting the war.” 

Confusion and Incompetence? 

Bild Online wrote on August 9: 

“Guess work [persists] after the agreement on a Ukraine peace summit between US President Donald Trump (79) and Vladimir Putin (72)… in Alaska. On Thursday it looked as if Trump negotiator Steve Witkoff (68) had made progress in his meeting with Putin… 

“According to BILD information, even before the peace summit on August 15, the Kremlin did not deviate from its maximum demand of wanting to completely dominate the five Ukrainian regions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson and Crimea before the weapons fall silent. The Russian side only brought ‘sectoral ceasefires’ into play- such as the mutual renunciation of attacks against energy facilities or larger cities behind the front. 

“Under no circumstances, however, does Putin want a halt to Russia’s large-scale offensives along the front – even though the USA had proposed largely lifting sanctions against Russia and concluding new economic agreements in return. Trump even brought up a ‘territorial swap’, which stipulates that Russia would be allowed to keep parts of the occupied Donbas in exchange for giving up additional areas (which the Ukrainian president categorically rejected). 

“And even worse: Trump’s special envoy Witkoff is said to have completely misunderstood some of the Russians’ statements and misinterpreted them as concessions from Putin. He misinterpreted a ‘peaceful withdrawal’ of the Ukrainians from Kherson and Zaporizhzhia demanded by Russia as an offer of a ‘peaceful withdrawal’ of the Russians from these regions… 

“… on Thursday evening [there was] a telephone conference between representatives of the US government – including special envoy Witkoff as well as Foreign Minister Marco Rubio (54) and Vice President JD Vance (41) – and the European partners. As BILD learned, the American side was perceived as chaotic and disunited. This was primarily due to Witkoff, whose statements about his conversation with Putin on Wednesday in the Kremlin were perceived as confusing. He himself appeared overwhelmed and incompetent to the Europeans when he spoke about the territorial issues in Ukraine. 

“Apparently there was also disagreement about how to proceed between Witkoff and Rubio, as the Secretary of State emphasized that the Europeans should be involved in the further process, while Vance and Witkoff only wanted to inform Europe about the results of Trump’s further steps.” 

EU Rejects Putin’s and Trump’s Proposal 

The New York Post wrote on August 9: 

“European officials rejected Russian President Vladimir Putin’s calls that Ukraine give up territories annexed during the war — instead demanding Saturday an immediate ceasefire from Moscow and NATO membership for Kyiv. The counter-offer demands rock-solid security guarantees for Ukraine — namely the long-coveted membership in NATO for the war-torn country before any territorial concessions… 

“If Putin were to attack a NATO member it would compel all others member countries to respond with military force — under its defense pact — a move that could ignite a global war. The European plan – put forward by the UK, France, Germany and Ukraine — also proposes that any land exchange must be reciprocal. If Ukraine removes troops from some regions, Russia must pull out of others. And a cease-fire agreement would need to be reached before any other steps are taken… 

“‘The future of Ukraine cannot be decided without the Ukrainians who have been fighting for their freedom and security for over three years now,’ French President Emmanuel Macron wrote on X…  The Russian ruler had previously called for the total demilitarization of Ukraine and replacement of its current government, as well as more Kyiv-controlled regions to be ceded to Moscow.” 

Zelensky Not on Board 

The New York Times wrote on August 9: 

“President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine on Saturday flatly rejected the idea that Ukraine could cede land to Russia after President Trump suggested that a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia could include ‘some swapping of territories.’ ‘Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier,’ Mr. Zelensky said in a video address from his office in Kyiv, several hours after Mr. Trump’s remarks, which appeared to overlook Ukraine’s role in the negotiations. ‘Any decisions made against us, any decisions made without Ukraine, are at the same time decisions against peace,’ Mr. Zelensky said. ‘They will bring nothing. These are dead decisions; they will never work.’… 

“Because Ukraine holds no Russian land, a swap would mean ceding Ukrainian-controlled territory in return for land currently occupied by Russia. But that approach clashes with a widely held view in Ukraine against surrendering territory to end the war, which left Mr. Zelensky little choice but to reject any land concessions.” 

Putin Can’t Be Trusted 

CNN wrote on August 9: 

“The conditions around Friday’s summit so wildly favor Moscow, it is obvious why Putin leapt at the chance, after months of fake negotiation, and it is hard to see how a deal emerges from the bilateral that does not eviscerate Ukraine. Kyiv and its European allies have reacted with understandable horror at the early ideas of Trump’s envoy, Steve Witkoff, that Ukraine cede the remainders of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in exchange for a ceasefire… 

“Europe is also wary of mirroring the failure of former UK Foreign Secretary Neville Chamberlain to stand up to Nazi Germany in 1938 – of the worthlessness of a ‘piece of paper’ signed by a Kremlin that has repeatedly agreed to deals in Ukraine and then simply used the pause to regroup before invading again.” 

Putin Does Not Change 

Newsmax wrote on August 11: 

“Retired U.S. Army Gen. Wesley Clark told Newsmax on Monday that Russian President Vladimir Putin remains committed to restoring the old Soviet Union — including taking Ukraine, threatening NATO’s eastern flank, and pulling former Soviet states like Georgia and Moldova back under Moscow’s control… Clark compared the situation to 2014, when Russia took Crimea under President Barack Obama, paused, and then struck again in 2022 under President Joe Biden. He said Putin acts when he senses weakness in the White House… 

“Clark stressed that abandoning Ukraine would be a strategic mistake… Clark also noted that European nations have contributed more to Ukraine’s defense than the U.S., pushing back against critics of American spending. He added the U.S. must remain engaged and strong.” 

JD Vance said this week that the USA was done funding the Ukraine war. 

Trump’s Big Blunder 

Express wrote on August 11: 

“Donald Trump was caught in a major blunder as he held a press conference on Monday… talking about his forthcoming meeting with Vladimir Putin, scheduled to take place on Friday in Alaska. ‘It’s embarrassing for me to be up here,’ he told reporters. ‘I’m going to see Putin. I’m going to Russia on Friday.’ The remarks provoked a social media meltdown, with many unable to resist poking fun at the US President over his huge gaffe… 

“One wrote: ‘The so-called president of the United States thinks that Alaska is in Russia. What an ongoing embarrassment!’… [Another wrote:]  ‘Can you imagine a Fortune 500 chairman talking like this and not being relieved before he fell off the podium?’” 

And they [rightly] made fun of Biden’s gaffes… Some have openly wondered whether Trump might be suffering from the beginning stages of dementia. 

Trump Attacks Zelenskyy Again 

Fox News wrote on August 11: 

“President Donald Trump  took aim at Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a press event on Monday over his frustration with the Ukrainian leader’s objection to ‘land swapping.’ ‘… I disagree with what he’s done, very, very severely, disagree. This is a war that should have never happened,’ Trump said, reiterating his belief that the Ukrainian president is in part at fault for Russia’s illegal 2022 invasion. 

“‘I was a little bothered by the fact that Zelensky was saying, “Well, I have to get constitutional approval”’, Trump said. ‘I mean, he’s got approval to go into war and kill everybody, but he needs approval to do a land swap, because there’ll be some land swapping going on.’… 

“Zelenskyy – who did not declare war on Russia, as Moscow had already invaded, did declare Martial Law on Feb. 24, 2022 with the approval of Ukraine’s parliament, which gave him presidential powers to mobilize a military response — made clear over the weekend that he objected to Trump’s ‘land swapping’ proposal and has repeatedly said it would require a national referendum under the nation’s constitution–not a unilateral decision by him.” 

Even Fox News had to correct Trump’s claims. 

Ukraine Giving In? 

The Telegraph wrote on August 11: 

“Ukraine could agree to stop fighting and cede territory already held by Russia… Volodymyr Zelensky told European leaders… 

“This would mean freezing the front line where it is and handing Russia de facto control of the territory it occupies in Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson and Crimea.” 

That would be a major defeat for Ukraine and a huge victory for Russia. 

EU Appeals to Trump Not to Give In to Putin 

Deutsche Welle wrote on August 12, 2025: 

“EU leaders have appealed to the US leader to defend European security interests and to give Ukraine a say in any agreement. 

“The appeal, signed by all EU leaders, bar Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, comes after Trump said on Monday that both sides would be forced to cede land to end the ongoing conflict. Ukraine and its allies fear that Trump might make territorial concessions to Putin that are tantamount to rewarding the Russian leader for launching his illegal and unprovoked full-scale invasion in February 2022.” 

Britain Worried About EU Demands 

The Telegraph wrote on August 12: 

“British [officials] are increasingly concerned about public comments on the future of Ukraine by the likes of Emmanuel Macron, Friedrich Merz and Kaja Kallas, the EU’s top diplomat. 

“They fear that issuing public demands to the US president may backfire and cause him to cut Europe out of talks altogether.” 

The real “worry” might turn out to be the USA/UK against the EU. 

Teleconference Between EU, Zelenskyy and Trump 

Deutsche Welle wrote on August 13: 

“European and Ukrainian leaders have talked with US President Donald Trump on Wednesday afternoon. During a joint press conference with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Berlin following a teleconference with Trump, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz stated that any agreement regarding Ukraine must first include a ceasefire. Merz added that a legal recognition of Russian ownership of Ukraine cannot happen. 

“Meanwhile, Zelenskyy stressed that ‘there can be no discussions about Ukraine without Ukraine’ … Zelenskyy added that his country wants strong security guarantees and that US President Donald Trump supports this. He also said that Trump assured him he would contact him after the meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday to discuss the results and next steps.” 

Die Welt added on August 13: 

“Ukraine is also ready to negotiate territorial issues. However, the so-called contact line [the strip separating the Ukrainian army from Russian-backed fighters] must be the starting point.” 

The Guardian added: 

“Merz says that Trump ‘largely shares’ the European position, and says it was a ‘very good, constructive talk.’… Macron [added that ] US president Donald Trump told European leaders that he ‘wanted to obtain a ceasefire in Ukraine during meeting with Putin.’” 

If Trump “largely shares” the European position, what is it that he does not share? 

Another Proposal? 

The Sun wrote: 

“RUSSIA and the US are considering a West Bank-style occupation of Ukraine to secure a truce, according to reports, as Zelensky and Euro leaders hold emergency talks. 

“The superpowers have discussed using Israel’s occupation of the West Bank as a model for ending the war in Ukraine, sources revealed. This would give Russia military and economic control of the occupied parts of Ukraine, which would run its own governing body.” 

Allegedly, Trump’s special envoy Witkoff supported this proposal. 

Trump’s and Rutte’s Confusion

Deutsche Welle wrote on August 14:

“Trump caused some geographical confusion in the run-up to Friday’s meeting, repeatedly referring to the event set to take place in Alaska as a meeting ‘in Russia’ — even though the US purchased the state from Russia in 1867. Trump then went on to say that he wanted to arrange a ‘land swap’ between Russia and Ukraine. This is a misnomer, however, as Ukraine does not currently control any Russian territory which it could exchange. Its counteroffensive into Russia’s Kursk region, which began in August 2024, is largely over. Ukraine, therefore, has no bargaining chip that would allow it to engage in a land exchange. That’s why Ukraine and its allies fear Trump could be aiming for Ukraine to cede territory to Russia…

“NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte caused a stir on Sunday when he told US broadcaster ABC that a future deal could acknowledge that ‘Russia is controlling de facto, factually some of the territory of Ukraine.’ Would this mean NATO accepting the surrender of Ukrainian territory and thus the redrawing of borders by brute force in its immediate neighborhood? Rutte said the West ‘can never accept that in a legal sense,’ and that only de facto recognition was acceptable.”

Anxiety in Europe

Politico wrote on August 14:

“The prospect of U.S. President Donald Trump’s Alaska meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin is, unsurprisingly, causing Ukrainian and European anxiety to rise. It’s a point that was echoed by Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk earlier this week, who noted he harbored ‘many fears’ about Friday’s summit — although he added he had ‘a lot of hope’ as well, presumably to avoid offending Washington…

“[The] European allies… have been hoping to persuade Trump not to agree to anything over Ukraine’s head. But is there really a chance that Trump can overcome what his former Russia czar Fiona Hill identifies as a ‘deferential’ attitude toward Putin? Or will the former KGB apparatchik advance his agenda to subjugate Ukraine, return it to being a Russian vassal and, by doing so, crack an already brittle Western alliance? With all the preconditions for Alaska being set by Russia — and not by Washington — it seems the latter is more likely…

“The problem is, any withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from Donetsk and Luhansk would be a military disaster for Ukraine. It would be a surrender of the country’s so-called eastern ‘fortress belt,’ where it has dug in and held Russian forces back for more than a decade, and would assist Russia to strike further west whenever Moscow wants. It would essentially be a Munich moment, with Trump brandishing a piece of paper and declaring peace in our time…

“Indeed, few seasoned observers of the Kremlin believe Putin is serious about giving up his ultimate goal of subjugating Ukraine — a nation he doesn’t believe should exist…”

Merz’s Decision on Gaza Not Made Alone? 

t-online wrote on August 10: 

“Merz’s decision, announced on Friday [to stop sending military equipment to Israel which could be used in Gaza], sparked fierce criticism from parts of the CDU and CSU. The CSU accused the Chancellor of failing to involve them. Merz responded: ‘I didn’t make this decision alone, but at the end of the day, it is a decision for which I alone must take responsibility. And I alone am responsible. But I can’t put it to a democratic vote either.'” 

Excuse me? And who supported him in his decision? Jens Spahn, who once again discreetly remains silent in the background? According to Bild Online from August 11, Spahn made dubious statements: “Union parliamentary group leader Jens Spahn (45), Merz’s most important deputy, spoke as cautiously as possible. He called the Chancellor’s decision against Israel ‘justifiable,’ but made it clear: ‘We are doing everything we can to ensure that German-Israeli relations remain intact, and that Germany can resume deliveries as soon as possible…'” 

Really? 

Can You Still Believe Merz? 

Bild Online wrote on August 9: 

“Does Chancellor Merz actually know what he’s done?… People can have different opinions about the war in Gaza and German weapons. But one thing is certain: Chancellor Merz has reversed a position that he has championed for years with more credibility than almost any other politician. As recently as January, Merz promised that with him as Chancellor, Israel would get everything it needed; this was ‘unmistakably clear.’ Judging by his own statements, the Chancellor has now betrayed his foreign policy convictions.. 

“It is unmistakably clear that even Friedrich Merz’s most sacred promises cannot be believed. Doubts about Merz’s credibility have long existed within his own ranks. Economic policymakers believed Merz when he swore off new debt and promised reforms during the election campaign. Ukraine supporters believed Merz when he vowed to deliver Taurus cruise missiles. Conservatives believed Merz would defend their pro-life positions – instead, he unconditionally supported a judicial candidate with a fundamentally different legal assessment of abortion. 

“The CDU/CSU, like all other parties, has plenty of experience with watering down political positions. But for a chancellor to single-handedly dismantle the core identity of an entire party and silently go on vacation simply shows how little respect he has for the members of parliament who elected him to office…” 

The days of Merz and the coalition are numbered… 

European Chat Control  

Cointelegraph wrote on August 5: 

“A controversial European Union proposal dubbed ‘Chat Control’ is regaining momentum, with 19 out of 27 EU member states reportedly backing the measure. The plan would mandate that messaging platforms, including WhatsApp, Signal and Telegram, must scan every message, photo and video sent by users starting in October, even if end-to-end encryption is in place… 

“Denmark reintroduced the proposal on July 1,  the first day of its EU Council presidency. France, once opposed, is now in favor… Belgium, Hungary, Sweden, Italy and Spain are also in favor, while Germany remains undecided. However, if Berlin joins the majority, a qualified council vote could push the plan through by mid-October… A qualified majority in the EU Council is achieved when two conditions are met. First, at least 55 percent of member states, meaning 15 out of 27, must vote in favor. Second, those countries must represent at least 65% of the EU’s total population… 

“The proposal cites the prevention of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) as its justification. However, it would result in… mass surveillance… of messaging and chats and the end of privacy of digital correspondence… Beyond scanning, the package includes mandatory age verification, effectively removing anonymity from messaging platforms… 

“Last month, Telegram founder Pavel Durov warned that France risks societal collapse if it continues down a path of political censorship and regulatory overreach. Durov was arrested in France in August 2024 after being accused of failing to moderate his app to reduce criminality. He also alleged that French intelligence officials approached him earlier this year with requests to censor pro-conservative content ahead of the May 2025 Romanian election, a request he says he refused.” 

Western Propaganda and Hypocrisy 

Israel 365 News wrote on August 8: 

“Recently, Hamas released horrific videos depicting two Israeli hostages… who have now been held in captivity in inhuman conditions for 670 days. One particularly harrowing video shows [one hostage], visibly emaciated, being forced to dig what appears to be his own grave in a Hamas tunnel beneath Gaza. These images evoke painful historical parallels of the Holocaust and the brutal conditions of Nazi concentration camps… 

“The release of these videos followed controversial announcements by world leaders, including UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, declaring their intention to recognize a Palestinian state. Many critics argue that this political move only emboldens Hamas and other terrorist organizations, offering them a dangerous form of legitimacy and encouragement to continue their atrocities.  Certainly, it does not give them reason to moderate, or release the 50 hostages still held in the hell of Gaza’s tunnels. 

“What’s particularly troubling is the moral inconsistency demonstrated by these purported global leaders… Since the Hamas attacks of October 7, 2023, numerous graphic images and videos have surfaced: mass murders of Israeli civilians, women raped, burning and beheading of people while alive, and the abduction of women, children, and Holocaust survivors…  What’s alarming is how shamelessly such evidence of brutality is circulated by terrorist groups, confident that the global media—fixated mainly on a one-sided narrative of Palestinian victimhood—will look the other way. Hamas, like the Nazi regime, relies heavily on propaganda to distort reality and rally support… 

“Western societies must wake up. If people genuinely care about the well-being of Palestinians, they must address the root cause of their suffering: the Islamic regime in Iran. It is the regime’s financing, indoctrination, and exporting of radical Islam that fuel movements like Hamas and perpetuate conflict in the region…” 

Trump Clashes With Netanyahu 

Israel 365 News wrote on August 8: 

“The relationship between Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu, once characterized by unprecedented warmth and mutual admiration, has taken a dramatic turn as the two leaders reportedly engaged in a heated shouting match over the humanitarian situation in Gaza. Citing unnamed sources, the report claimed the phone call devolved into a shouting match. While the White House refused to comment, the Prime Minister’s office claimed it was ‘fake news’. 

“According to NBC News, citing unnamed senior U.S. officials, the dramatic phone call occurred on July 28, following a public dispute over the humanitarian situation in Gaza. The conflict began when Netanyahu declared at a public event that ‘there is no starvation in Gaza,’ despite widespread reports of hunger and suffering in the Palestinian enclave. Trump publicly contradicted his former ally the following day during a visit to Scotland, stating he was ‘not particularly convinced’ by Netanyahu’s assurance. The president said there was ‘real starvation’ in Gaza, adding pointedly, ‘You can’t fake that.’ He mentioned seeing images of children in Gaza who ‘look very hungry.’ 

“Angered by Trump’s public contradiction, Netanyahu reportedly demanded a phone call with the president. What followed was described by officials as ‘a direct, mostly one-way conversation about the status of humanitarian aid’ with Trump ‘doing most of the talking.’ During the call, Netanyahu maintained that reports of starvation in Gaza had been ‘fabricated’ by Hamas and that hunger was not widespread in the territory. However, Trump interrupted the Israeli leader and began yelling, according to the NBC report. The president insisted that his aides had shown him proof that children in Gaza were starving and that he didn’t want to hear such evidence dismissed as ‘fake.’” 

Maybe, Trump should have consulted first with his Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee. Note the next article. 

Huckabee: Hamas Responsible for “Starvation” 

Breitbart wrote on August 13: 

“U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee told Breitbart News on Tuesday that Hamas, not Israel, is to blame for whatever food deprivation is being suffered by Palestinian people in Gaza, because it hoards food aid… Huckabee said that while there was hunger in Gaza, Israel was trying to make sure that Palestinians received food aid. Hamas, however, was more concerned with controlling and profiting from aid — and damaging Israel’s image — than it was in helping the Palestinian people whom it purports to represent. 

“He explained:  ‘The simple truth is, Hamas is the one responsible for the starvation, to the degree that there is starvation. I point out that if you look at the people from Hamas, they aren’t starving. These are well-fed people. I even said to Piers Morgan last night on an interview with him, I said, you know, there may be starvation going on in Gaza, but it’s not Hamas. These people don’t need food… I’ll tell you, who’s starving: the [Israeli] hostages are starving. And it really ticks me off when these European leaders like [France’s Emmanuel] Macron and [the UK’s Keir] Starmer, you know, they’re putting all this pressure on Israel to drop food in for people in Gaza, and I want them to maybe put a little pressure on Hamas to start feeding the hostages, and tell them to stop making these hostages dig their own graves, which I find revolting and disgusting. And where’s the condemnation for that?  

“‘If there’s hunger in Gaza, and I believe there is — I’ll be the first to say I think that in pockets, not everywhere, but in pockets, there’s hunger. But the reason is twofold. One, Hamas prevents people from getting to the feeding sites and shoots some of them — and I heard that from the Gazans themselves — but a lot of the food that goes into Gaza is stolen and looted by Hamas, who put it in warehouses, and then they turn around and sell it to people on the black market. Last year, Hamas made $500 million — that’s half a billion dollars — selling the relief food, the humanitarian food. By the United Nations’ own numbers… 88% of the food that they send into Gaza is stolen or looted. I think about that. 88% — that’s a 12% effective success rate and an 88% failure rate.’ 

“Huckabee also faulted the United Nations (UN) for worsening the problem, and effectively helping Hamas: 

“‘… They take billions of dollars of money, and I watch what they do with it, and it’s disgusting, and there should be accountability for it, and I don’t think the US should continue to fund some of these programs and projects they have, as ineffective as they are…’” 

Huckabee has always been a “straight shooter.” His words should not be dismissed or rejected.  

Israel Kills Al Jazeera’s Reporters 

Deutsche Welle wrote on August 11: 

“Qatari broadcaster Al Jazeera’s reporter Anas al-Sharif and four of his colleagues were killed on Sunday in an Israeli strike near Shifa Hospital in eastern Gaza City… The Israeli military has claimed that al-Sharif headed a Hamas cell, an allegation Al Jazeera has rejected… Gaza health officials and Al Jazeera said the journalists were killed when an Israeli missile hit a tent near the hospital. An official at Shifa said two other people were also killed… 

“Al-Sharif had worked as a prominent correspondent for Al Jazeera and was previously part of a photography team for the Reuters news agency that won the 2024 Pulitzer Prize for Breaking News Photography for coverage of the Israel-Hamas war. He was described by the network as ‘one of Gaza’s bravest journalists’ and a vital voice in reporting on the war. His coverage often included interviews with residents directly affected by the fighting, as well as footage from sites immediately after Israeli strikes…

Germany has pressed Israel for a full and transparent explanation over the killing of Al Jazeera journalists in Gaza, ‘Israel is now expected, from our perspective, to explain itself in the most transparent and comprehensible manner possible,’ a spokesperson for the German Foreign Office told the German press agency dpa, while calling the killing of media workers ‘absolutely unacceptable’ under international humanitarian law.”  

The Frankfurter Allgemeine wrote on August 11:

“The German government has called on the Israeli government to explain the killing of six journalists in the Gaza Strip. This is absolutely inadmissible under international humanitarian law, said a spokesperson for the Federal Foreign Office. The fact that the case is not clear-cut can be seen in the spokesperson’s postscript: ‘If it happens as it has now, then it is up to the party carrying out such a killing to clearly explain why it was necessary.’ Israel must explain ‘in the most transparent and comprehensible manner possible’ how it can justify the targeted killing of journalists.

“Israel, however, has already done so, according to its own opinion. Al-Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif was not a journalist, but the leader of a Hamas terrorist cell, the Israeli army announced. Intelligence information and documents found in Gaza prove that al-Sharif was responsible for rocket attacks on Israeli civilians and soldiers

“From a distance, the case is as difficult to assess as the situation in the Gaza Strip itself, which is why one should be cautious about jumping to conclusions

“Was Anas al-Sharif a journalist or a terrorist? The question of who acts as a neutral reporter and who as a propagandist in Gaza has been raised ever since the Hamas massacre of October 7, 2023, when ‘journalists’ were on the scene, and people wondered how that could be, why they spread Hamas’s terror cheers unfiltered and helped lay the foundation for Hamas propaganda that this was a just liberation struggle…”

Developments like these will only lead to further international outrage towards the state of Israel.

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

Comments on News and Prophecy, August 9, 2025 / A Story of Sacrifice

On August 9, 2025, Norbert Link will present the first message, titled, “Comments on News and Prophecy, August 9, 2025,” and Michael Link will present the sermon, titled, “A Story of Sacrifice.”

The live services are available, over video and audio, at http://eternalgod.org/live-services/ (12:30 pm Pacific Time; 1:30 pm Mountain Time; 2:30 pm Central Time; 3:30 pm Eastern Time; 8:30 pm Greenwich Mean Time; 9:30 pm Central European Time). Just click on Connect to Live Stream.

This Week in the News

Job Report Not to Trump’s Liking 

The Daily Mail wrote on August 1: 

“The president is taking out his frustration on Dr. Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of labor statistics, who was appointed to the role by former President Joe Biden. He accused her of ‘faking’ jobs numbers before the 2024 election to ‘try and boost Kamala’s chances of victory,’ in a blistering post to Truth Social that did not provide evidence of the stunning accusation… 

“Hiring growth dropped dramatically last month and unemployment ticked up, the latest jobs report released on Friday showed. Non-farm payrolls added 73,000 in July, far lower than the 100,000 expected by analysts. The unemployment rate also ticked up to 4.2 percent. The report also sharply revised down the figures for May and June by a combined 258,000 jobs from the previously released figures. 

“Following the revision June’s total was left at just 14,000 and May’s at 19,000 — effectively flat. Analysts say July’s figure is also likely to be revised lower, possibly into negative territory.

Trump hammered the economist for those revisions, although they are routine in the government’s monthly job reports – sometimes going up, sometimes going down as businesses around the country report on their payrolls. .. The latest figures suggest cracks are in fact starting to show up in the economy, despite a slew of previous better-than-expected economic data released recently… 

“It is just the latest example of Trump demanding that even traditionally independent parts of the government bend to his preferences – although a president who is denied bad information about the unemployment situation would be deprived timely information to change course for their own political benefit.”

“Trump Lies About Labor Statistics Chief” 

The Guardian wrote on August 2: 

“Speaking to reporters on Friday, Donald Trump defended his decision to fire Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of labor statistics, and falsely accused her of having released reports just before the 2024 election that overstated the number of new jobs created by the Biden-Harris administration. Asked by a reporter, ‘Why did you fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics?’ Trump replied: ‘Because I think her numbers were wrong, just like I thought her numbers were wrong before the election.’

“The president then went on to give a wildly inaccurate account of the jobs data released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in 2024. ‘Days before the election, she came out with these beautiful numbers for Kamala, I guess Biden-Kamala, and she came out with these beautiful numbers trying to get somebody else elected,’ Trump said, entirely misrepresenting the jobs report released on 1 November 2024, four days before the election, which in fact showed the US added just 12,000 jobs over the previous month. 

“At the time, the Trump campaign called the jobs report ‘a catastrophe’ that ‘definitively reveals how badly Kamala Harris broke our economy.’ On Friday, however, the president offered a very different account of that report released just nine months ago. ‘Then, right after the election,’ Trump claimed, ‘she had an 8- or 900,000 dollar [sic] massive reduction, said she made a mistake.’ 

“What Trump was misremembering is a Bureau of Labor Statistics announcement, on 21 August 2024, that updated data showed that there had been 818,000 fewer jobs added in the US in the previous year than it had initially estimated. That downward revision was large, but part of an annual process, in which the bureau updates its initial estimates when it gets better data.

“The same day that revision was announced in 2024, Trump [posted] that the Biden-Harris administration had been ‘caught fraudulently manipulating Job Statistics’ and the ‘New Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that the Administration PADDED THE NUMBERS with an extra 818,000 Jobs that DO NOT EXIST, AND NEVER DID.’ On Friday, however, Trump repeatedly insisted that the August revision had not come until after the November election…” 

Express wrote on August 2: 

“Pressure inside the White House has risen once again as Donald Trump erupted, sacking the head of the US statistics agency after they released data about the nation’s weakening jobs market… [despite] zero evidence that any data was tampered with…

“His brash move has triggered concerns for bankers and markets around the world, who believe Trump may now interfere in the publishing of financial stats and reports that decide the prices of a wide variety of assets.” 

This will contribute to America’s economic downfall. 

Trump’s Tariffs Policy Backfires 

The New York Post wrote on August 1, 2025: 

“New cracks emerged in the U.S. economy on Friday after the government reported a significant slowdown in job growth, a sign of the serious and accelerating effects of President Trump’s punishing new tariffs... The jobs data offered only the latest indication that Mr. Trump’s policies, particularly his expanding global trade war, had started to put the squeeze on the economy. Tariffs are taxes on imports, paid by U.S. companies purchasing those goods abroad. Other economic data released this week offered fresh evidence that Mr. Trump’s duties had slowed trade and started to send prices higher… 

“Adding to its challenges, the president late Thursday announced a dramatic widening of his trade war, slapping major new tariffs on dozens of countries that take effect on Aug. 7. Switzerland was stunned by a 39 percent tariff, among the highest. Syria, Laos and Myanmar were handed rates of 40 to 41 percent… Earlier in the week, Mr. Trump imposed 50 percent tariffs on Brazil as punishment for its prosecution of Jair Bolsonaro, his ally, who is accused of plotting a coup after he lost the last presidential election.”

New Tariff Rates… For Now! 

The New York Post wrote on August 1: 

“Among the notable rates that will be charged at 12:01 a.m. Aug. 7 — rather than on the Friday deadline initially announced by the White House — are 15% for Iceland and Israel, 30% for South Africa, 39% for Switzerland and 20% for Taiwan and Vietnam… 

“The steepest tariff rates will be carried by Syria (41%), Laos and Myanmar (40%), Switzerland (39%) and Iraq and Serbia (35%). The list also denotes a 35% rate on imports from Canada after Trump signed an order upping the current tariff by 10 percentage points.” 

More and more Americans are waking up to the fact that Trump’s economic policies just don’t work and are harmful to America. Note the next article. 

Most Americans Unhappy with Trump 

The Guardian wrote on August 1: 

“Americans are struggling financially, grappling with debt and the rising cost of living, and are blaming the Trump administration and corporate interests for worsening economic outlooks for working families, according to a new poll. Six out of 10 Americans place blame on the Trump administration for driving up their cost of living, according to a poll conducted by Morning Consult for the Century Foundation… 

Sixty three per cent said Trump had had a negative impact on grocery prices, and 61% said he had had a negative impact on the cost of living. Nearly half, 49%, said the Trump administration had had a negative impact on their finances. Nearly eight out of 10 Americans, including 70% of Republicans, fear that Trump’s tariffs will increase the price of everyday goods. ‘Donald Trump has simultaneously raised prices on everyday goods through a reckless approach to tariffs, a decimation of programs that help Americans afford healthcare, education, food and childcare, and then kneecapping federal regulators who keep banks and other big businesses from swindling consumers,’ said Julie Margetta Morgan, president of the Century Foundation…

“According to the poll, more than six out of 10 Americans said it had become more difficult to find a good paying job, buy a home and afford childcare. More than four out of five Americans, 83% said they were concerned about the cost of groceries, with 46% saying they were very concerned. Some 47% said they were worried about being able to pay their rent or mortgage64% said they were worried about affording an unexpected medical expense. 

About 48% said they believed they would have trouble affording an unexpected $500 bill without borrowing. One in four said it would be ‘very difficult’… Americans also fear things are getting worse economically, with 76% of those polled saying they fear a looming economic recession…” 

These are terrible figures, but sadly, they reflect reality. 

Switzerland Faces Unpredictable Bad-Tempered Trump 

The Guardian wrote on August 4: 

“Switzerland, home to some of the world’s best-known luxury brands, was left stunned after the US president on Friday imposed one of the highest tariff rates [39%] in his global trade reset. Industry associations said tens of thousands of jobs were at risk. 

“Local media had reported that after three months of talks, negotiators believed they had secured a 10% tariff on exports to the US, a key market for Swiss products such as luxury watches, jewelry and chocolate but also machinery and pharmaceuticals. But after a 30-minute call with Keller-Sutter on Thursday evening variously described as ‘bad-tempered’, ‘disastrous’ and ‘badly misjudged’, Trump imposed a levy even higher than the 31% he had announced on his so-called ‘liberation day’ in April… 

“Analysts have said tariffs could still change at any moment because of the unpredictability of the Trump administration…” 

A subsequent meeting between Marco Rubio and Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter in Washington did not result in any changes.

India Not Happy 

Breitbart wrote on August 1: 

“President Donald Trump increased the pressure on [Prime Minister Narendra] Modi on Wednesday by threatening to impose a 25% tariff on Indian imports, plus additional penalties if India continues to do business with Russia… Trump… castigated India for buying the ‘vast majority of their military equipment from Russia,’ and he seemed to accuse the Indians of financing the invasion of Ukraine by purchasing large quantities of Russian oil… 

“In another Truth Social post, Trump appeared to wash his hands of India altogether. ‘I don’t care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care,’ he grumbled…” 

The New York Times wrote on August 3:

“Indian officials said on Saturday that they would keep purchasing cheap oil from Russia despite a threat of penalties from President Trump, the latest twist in an issue that New Delhi thought it had settled… 

“India has drastically increased its purchases of Russian oil since the Kremlin invaded Ukraine. Russia is now the source of more than one-third of India’s oil imports — up from less than 1 percent before the war. It brings in about two million barrels of crude oil a day, making it the second largest importer of Russian oil, after China.” 

Newsmax wrote on August 4: 

“President Donald Trump said on Monday he will substantially raise tariffs on India over its purchases of Russian oil. ‘India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don’t care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine,’ Trump said in a post on Truth Social.”

India will become part of the kings of the East, joining Russia, China and other Far Eastern nations. 

Court of Appeals to Decide on Trump’s Tariffs 

Politico wrote on July 31: 

“Federal appeals court judges on Thursday sharply questioned President Donald Trump’s authority to impose sweeping tariffs on foreign trading partners under an unprecedented use of emergency powers. Several judges of the Washington, D.C.-based Federal Circuit Court of Appeals repeatedly wondered how Trump could justify the broad tariffs using a 1977 law known as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, that presidents have used to set economic sanctions and other penalties on foreign countries — but never previously tariffs… 

“However, the 11 judges vigorously questioned attorneys for the states and the private companies as well… 

“The New York-based U.S. Court of International Trade ruled in May that Trump had exceeded his authority under IEEPA to impose the tariffs and ordered them to be vacated. The Trump administration appealed that ruling to the Federal Circuit, which allowed the government to continue collecting the duties while the case proceeds. The appeals court set a rapid-fire schedule to consider the matter in front of the court’s full 11-member bench, which is made up of eight Democratic appointees, three Republican appointees and no Trump appointees. The lawsuit is expected to end up at the Supreme Court.” 

A decision of the Court of Appeals is expected to be announced in August. 

Focus wrote on August 1: 

“The court could prohibit Trump from pursuing the tariff war. Then the 15 percent tariffs on most goods would also be invalidated [including those against the EU and Germany] … Trump is imposing his tariffs… without parliamentary approval… In parliament, the Republicans hold a narrow majority in both chambers (Senate and House of Representatives). This majority could be enough for Trump to push through his tariffs after all. 

“However, the next elections are scheduled for 2026. Parliament will largely be re-elected. The parliamentarians must already seek re-election. Trump’s tariffs are also rather unpopular among Republican voters. It is possible that some Republican dissidents will oppose Trump… Even if the appeals court rules against Trump, the tariff war is likely to continue to occupy Germany for a long time.” 

Meaning, the relationship between the USA and Germany will continue to deteriorate drastically. 

US-EU Deal Unenforceable 

Politico wrote on July 28: 

“The European Union has admitted it doesn’t have the power to deliver on a promise to invest $600 billion in the United States economy, only hours after making the pledge at landmark trade talks in Scotland. That’s because the cash would come entirely from private sector investment over which Brussels has no authority… ‘It is not something that the EU as a public authority can guarantee. It is something which is based on the intentions of the private companies,’ said one of the senior Commission officials. The Commission has not said it will introduce any incentives to ensure the private sector meets that $600 billion target, nor given a precise timeframe for the investment… 

“The Commission pointed out that the figure would come from private companies, not European taxpayers, contrasting with Japan’s promise to mobilize $550 billion of both public and private investments in the U.S. as part of a recently agreed trade deal.

“But the idea that the private sector can be relied upon to provide that level of investment was met with skepticism… ‘[The EU] is not China, right? So nobody can tell private companies how much they invest in the U.S.’...” 

In addition, all 27 EU member states would have to approve the deal. Some, like France, Hungary and now even Germany have expressed reservations. 

Trump Threatens EU 

The New York Post wrote on August 5: 

“President Trump warned Tuesday that if the European Union fails to deliver on its commitment to invest $600 billion in the US,  he will ramp up tariffs against the 27-nation bloc… ‘Then they pay tariffs of 35%,’ Trump [said] when asked what would happen if the EU doesn’t pony up. ‘They brought down their tariffs, so they paid $600 billion and because of that, I reduced their tariffs from 30% down to 15%,’ the president explained. 

“‘They gave me $600 billion and that’s a gift. … They gave us $600 billion that we can invest in anything we want.’… ‘The details are $600 billion to invest in anything I want. Anything. I can do anything I want with it,’ Trump reiterated when pressed for more specifics…” 

EuroNews wrote on August 5: 

“The European Commission is unable to design and implement investments on behalf of the private sector. The $600 billion has been described by the Commission as an indication based on the executive’s contacts with industry. ‘It’s not something the EU, as a public authority, can guarantee – it’s something based on the intention of private companies,’ a senior official said last week.” 

Euractiv wrote on August 5: 

“An official White House account of the deal also states that the EU has committed to purchase  ‘significant amounts of US military equipment’ – a claim rejected by Brussels.” 

NPR wrote on August 5: 

“Four European countries have agreed to buy $1 billion worth of U.S. weapons and send them to Ukraine… ‘We already have commitments from the Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, and Denmark – over one billion dollars for American weapons that Ukraine will receive…’, Zelenskyy wrote on X.” 

Major Tourist Visa Change 

MSN wrote on August 4: 

“The State Department is proposing a rule requiring some business and tourist visa applicants to post a bond of up to $15,000 to enter the United States, a step critics say could put the process out of reach for many… The new visa bond program will take effect on August 20… 

“Under the plan, U.S. consular officers can require a bond from visa applicants who meet certain criteria. This includes nationals of countries with high visa overstay rates, countries with deficient screening and vetting, and those that offer citizenship-by-investment programs, particularly where citizenship is granted without a residency requirement. Visitors subject to the bond will receive it back upon leaving the U.S., naturalizing as a citizen, or in the event of death. If a traveler overstays, however, the bond may be forfeited and used to help cover the costs associated with their removal… 

“Citizens of countries in the Visa Waiver Program are exempt, and consular officers will retain the discretion to waive the bond on a case-by-case basis… The list of affected countries will be published at least 15 days before the program begins and may be updated with similar notice. In the 2020 version of the pilot, countries such as Afghanistan, Angola, Burkina Faso, Burma (Myanmar), Chad, Congo, Eritrea, Iran, Laos, Liberia, Libya, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen were included.” 

Ex-Obama Officials Face Federal Grand Jury Probe 

The New York Post wrote on August 4: 

“The Justice Department is opening a federal grand jury investigation of former Obama administration officials… including former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey… 

“Trump and current DNI Tulsi Gabbard have called for a federal probe into the early days of the Russia collusion probe dubbed ‘Crossfire Hurricane’… The president has accused the former officials of a treasonous and seditious conspiracy to undermine his first-term agenda, which ultimately led to more than two years of leaky investigations before special counsel Robert Mueller turned up no evidence of collusion…

Treason does not have a statute of limitations, but no American has been convicted of that charge since 1949. It’s possible that prosecutors could develop a novel legal theory to revive seemingly expired charges, as performed by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg last year when he won a 34-count felony conviction against Trump for falsifying business records to conceal 2016 hush money payments.”

Banks Debanked Trump

The New York Post wrote on August 5:

“JPMorgan and Bank of America  ‘debanked’ President Trump for his role in the January 6 Capitol Hill melee following pressure from the Biden administration’s banking regulators and the Federal Reserve… sources at the banks — the largest and second-largest in the US in terms of assets — confirmed… threats from President Joe Biden’s bank regulators that banking the former president’s money put them in danger of falling afoul of rules that prohibit financial institutions from doing business with individuals and companies that present a ‘reputational risk.’…

“Trump himself revealed that he was debanked… He said he was denied services at both institutions sometime after his first term ended in January 2021, just weeks after the storming of the Capitol…  First, he said, he was booted by JPMorgan. ‘I had 100s of millions. I had many, many accounts loaded up with cash. I was loaded up with cash, and they told me, “I’m sorry, sir, we can’t have you. You have 20 days to get out.” I said, “You’ve got to be kidding. I’ve been with you for 35, 40 years.”’ Then he was denied services by Bank of America…. 

“Trump and his regulators have sought to end the practice and he’s issuing an executive order imminently to end politically motivated debanking.”

This is really outrageous. Trump’s executive order would be more than overdue. 

Fight Between Republicans and Democrats Intensifies in Texas 

Texas Tribune wrote on August 4: 

“The Texas House voted Monday afternoon to track down and arrest more than 50 Democratic lawmakers who were not present when the chamber gaveled in. After the 85-6 vote, House Speaker Dustin Burrows said he would immediately sign civil warrants for each of the legislators, empowering the chamber’s sergeant-at-arms and state troopers to arrest and bring them to the Capitol. They will not face civil or criminal charges from the arrests. The warrants apply only within state lines, making them largely symbolic as most of the legislators in question decamped to Illinois, New York and Massachusetts to forestall passage of the GOP’s proposed redraw of Texas’ congressional map… 

“The current congressional map, drawn by a Republican-dominated Legislature in 2021, has netted 25 GOP seats in the last two elections. But after pressure from President Donald Trump’s team, Abbott directed lawmakers to redraw the map during the special legislative session, which started July 21. Last week, the House proposed new congressional lines dividing up existing districts in Austin, Houston and Dallas with the aim of netting five more Republican seats… 

“Rep. Gene Wu, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, said in a statement Sunday, accusing Abbott of ‘using an intentionally racist map to steal the voices of millions of Black and Latino Texans, all to execute a corrupt political deal.’… The departed House members will face fines of $500 for each day that they miss, as well as the threat of reprimand, censure and expulsion, although that would require a two-thirds vote among members.” 

Newsmax wrote on August 6: 

“Defiant [Democratic] House members remaining absent from the Texas Legislature stand to be fined nearly $400,000, according to the state chamber’s rules… A total of 57 Democrats skipped Monday’s session, bringing the penalties to $28,500.” 

CNN wrote on August 5: 

“For a second day in a row the Texas House failed to reach a quorum as dozens of Democrats have left the state in protest over GOP plans to potentially eliminate five Democratic US House seats ahead of the 2026 midterm elections… Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said he would seek court rulings against the Democrats if they don’t return by Friday ‘ensuring that their seats are declared vacant.’…” 

This would be an unprecedented and, legal experts say, likely futile effort requiring individual lawsuits against each member and new elections to fill their seats 

Two US Nuclear Submarines Positioned to Reach Russia 

Express wrote on August 1: 

“The war of words between US President Donald Trump and Dmitry Medvedev, a close ally of Vladimir Putin, escalated on Friday evening. The American leader announced on the platform Truth Social that he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned ‘in appropriate regions’ in light of ‘foolish and inflammatory statements’ coming from Russia… It comes after Medvedev warned Mr Trump to remember Russia has Soviet-era nuclear strike capabilities of last resort. That came after Mr Trump told Medvedev to ‘watch his words’… 

“[Medvedev] said Mr Trump should remember how dangerous the fabled ‘Dead Hand’ can be. This was a reference to a secretive Russian command system designed to launch nuclear missiles if Russia’s leadership were to be taken out in an enemy strike.” 

It won’t come to that. No major war between the USA and Russia, let alone a nuclear war, is prophesied in the Bible. But, a nuclear war between Russia and a German-led Europe IS foretold in Scripture. 

Russia and China Begin War Games 

MSN wrote on August 4: 

“Russia and China are staging mock combat drills and other war games in the Sea of Japan in a sign of strengthening military ties. 

“Though pre-planned, the joint naval exercises that began on Sunday came a day after Donald Trump moved US nuclear submarines closer to Russia in response to inflammatory comments from Russia’s former president Dmitry Medvedev.”  

Putin Moves Nuclear Bombers Closer to Europe

Express wrote on August 4: 

“Vladimir Putin has moved at least four heavy Tu-95MS nuclear bombers closer to Europe. 

“The strategic aircraft are often used to bomb Ukraine, and Insider UA says they have been loaded with missiles, leading to a ‘high probability’ of an imminent major attack.” 

“Only 16% of Germans Would ‘Definitely’ Fight for Country” 

Deutsche Welle wrote on August 4: 

“Around one in six Germans say they would join the military in the event of a conflict or a call to arms, a new survey… recorded that 16% of participants said they would ‘definitely’ fight, while another 22% said they would ‘probably’ do so. 

“However, 59% said they would ‘probably not’ or definitely not be willing to defend Germany in the event of an attack… More than one in four respondents (27%) said they considered a military attack on Germany within the next five years to be very or somewhat likely. Meanwhile, 59% of respondents said they felt it was likely that Germany would have to provide military assistance to another NATO member.” 

These results make little sense. But these “opinions” are only temporary anyhow.  

Recognizing Palestine? 

The New York Post wrote on August 1: 

“French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced this week that their countries would unilaterally recognize a Palestinian state. The first problem with that is ‘Palestine’ is a fictional place. There never was any such thing… 

“What happens when a civil war breaks out? Because the prospects are quite high… The French and Brits should recall that the first thing Gazans did when handed a protostate in 2005 was to destroy over 3,000 greenhouses and modern farming systems that American Jews had purchased for $14 million and handed them, gratis. The second thing they did, though, was put Hamas in charge.

“So, will France and Britain support open elections in this new nation?… What if Hamas, or some other iteration of that organization, wins those elections? Will France and Britain recognize such a state?… 

“Is France or Britain going to disarm Hamas? Is France or Britain going to bring back the more than 50 hostages still being held and tortured in Gaza?…” 

Canada has also declared that they want to recognize a Palestinian state. Germany has said that they are supporting a two-state solution. But a two-state solution is fiction. Israel does not want it, and neither do Hamas and the Palestinians. They want a one-state solution—without Israel. 

Hamas Sabotages Humanitarian Supplies 

Nius wrote on August 2: 

“The German government has increased its concern about the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip. Government spokesman Stefan Kornelius stated that despite ‘initial slight progress’ in providing aid to the population, the emergency remains acute. Of particular concern is the systematic diversion of aid supplies by Hamas and other criminal organizations, which are blocking urgently needed aid for the civilian population. 

“According to German security sources, a significant portion of the aid supplies entering the Gaza Strip are stolen by Hamas and other groups. 50 to 100 percent of the aid is intercepted by armed forces or criminal organizations, according to a security insider. Since May 19, a total of 2,010 trucks carrying aid from the United Nations have entered the Gaza Strip. However, official UN figures show that only 260 of these trucks reached their destination. The majority, approximately 1,753 trucks, were forcibly intercepted by armed forces. These goods then often end up on the black market and do not reach the affected civilian population.” 

But it’s easy to blame Israel for this as well. Anti-Semitism is in high gear. 

Prayer on the Temple Mount 

BBC News wrote on August 4: 

“Israel’s far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir has visited the al-Aqsa Mosque compound in Jerusalem and prayed there, violating a decades-old arrangement covering one of the most sensitive sites in the Middle East. Photos and videos of his visit show Ben-Gvir leading Jewish prayers at the compound, which is known by Jews as the Temple Mount, in occupied East Jerusalem. Praying at the site breaks a long-time arrangement that allows Jews to visit the site but not pray. 

“The Israeli prime minister’s office released a statement saying there had been no change to Israel’s policy of maintaining the status quo agreement that allows only Muslim worship there. Jordan, custodian of the site, called Ben-Gvir’s latest visit ‘an unacceptable provocation’. Hamas called it ‘a deepening of the ongoing aggressions against our Palestinian people’, while a spokesperson for Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said the visit ‘crossed all red lines’. 

“The site is the holiest place for Jews because it was the site of two Biblical temples. It is the third holiest place for Muslims, who believe it was where the Prophet Muhammad ascended to heaven. It was captured by Israel from Jordan in the 1967 Middle East war… Palestinians… complain that in recent years Jewish visitors have often been seen praying without being stopped by Israeli police. The Waqf, the Islamic endowment which runs the site, said Ben-Gvir was among 1,250 Jews who ascended the compound on Sunday morning. Ben-Gvir, an ultra-nationalist who as national security minister oversees the police, has visited the site before, but the Times of Israel reported this was the first time that he openly prayed at the site. He was flanked by police officers while entering and touring the compound. 

“In a statement at the site, Ben-Gvir said ‘horror’ video of hostages recently released by Hamas, in which they appear emaciated, were aimed at putting pressure on Israel, and called for the hostages’ return. The minister also repeated his call for Israel to occupy the whole of the Gaza Strip (so is Netanyahu) and to encourage what he described as ‘voluntary emigration’ of Palestinians from the territory…” 

Why is it that Muslims are allowed to pray on the Temple Mount, but Jews are not?

More Discrepancies in the Epstein Tale 

The Daily Beast wrote on August 1: 

A mystery third person was spotted on camera in jailhouse footage from Jeffrey Epstein’s final night alive, a CBS News investigation has revealed. The person, who was not identified or even mentioned in a Department of Justice investigative report, is seen entering a common area near where Epstein’s cell was located just after 4 a.m. on Aug. 10, 2019, two hours before he was found dead. 

“A CBS analysis of footage determined that the guards on duty, Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, did not unlock a door to let the unknown person into the Special Housing Unit within the Metropolitan Correctional Center. That reportedly contradicts what Noel told the DOJ, when she said that the opening of the door to the area ‘requires a physical key.’ Without the key, which was supposedly only accessible to Noel and Thomas, it is unclear how the mystery person entered the unit

“Footage released by the government this month comes from a security camera that did not have a visual on the entire common area for Epstein’s unit. It recorded the guard’s desk, which was a floor below where Epstein was held, and only a sliver of the staircase that led to the convicted sex offender’s cell block. The limited footage is extremely grainy, making it challenging to analyze movements in the area. 

“CBS notes that the lone security camera with footage—the DOJ says other cameras were broadcast live to a security center, but their footage was lost—did not capture enough of the staircase leading to Epstein’s cell block to say definitively that the mystery person did not approach it. ‘There is no way to know from the video if it indeed was possible for someone to enter the unit and climb the stairs to Epstein’s cell without being seen,’ the network reported…

“White House officials from the administrations of both Joe Biden and Donald Trump have said that all evidence points to Epstein’s cause of death being a suicide. Still, debate over whether the alleged sex trafficker died via suicide or was murdered—as his brother, Mark, and many MAGA figures believe—has been widely debated. The CBS analysis includes the expertise of video forensics specialists. They said they saw multiple issues with the government’s conclusions about what went down on Epstein’s final night alive. Among the reported ‘discrepancies’ was a mysterious ‘orange shape’ that was recorded ascending the stairs to where Epstein’s cell was located… 

“Despite the guards on duty being required to check on Epstein every half-hour, as he was on suicide watch and temporarily did not have a cell-mate, the DOJ said no guards checked on him that night. His body was found at breakfast the next morning…” 

at.com reported on August 1: 

“President Donald Trump’s name [as well as the names of other prominent public figures were] redacted ‘numerous times’ in the Jeffrey Epstein files by an FBI team determining which information potentially could be released to the public, according to an explosive report published Friday.” 

It was also revealed that the redaction took place before it was announced that “no further disclosure” of the Epstein files “would be appropriate or warranted” (Common Dreams, August 1). 

Newsmax wrote on August 6: 

“Maxwell… reportedly told Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche during their interview last month that President Donald Trump never did anything inappropriate in her presence… Maxwell, who is serving 20 years in prison after being convicted of sexually trafficking minors, further said nothing that could be considered harmful to the president…” 

Her attempt to get a pardon or at least leniency is obvious. 

Kennedy Bans Mercury in Vaccines 

Breitbart wrote on August 2: 

“Robert F. Kennedy Jr…. confirmed the move on Saturday, blasting federal health agencies for allowing a known neurotoxin to be injected into pregnant women and children for decades… Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that thimerosal, a mercury based preservative still found in flu shots given to children and pregnant women, has now been fully banned in the United States… 

“A… study found that this highly toxic mercury remains in the brain for over 27 years. Kennedy cited a CDC-funded 2017 study linking flu shots during pregnancy to miscarriage, which found the odds of miscarriage within 28 days were 7.7 times higher for women who received the vaccine. He also referenced a 2017 study… that reported an elevated risk of autism spectrum disorders in children whose mothers received a flu shot during the first trimester…

“Despite intense pressure and smears from the pharmaceutical industry and its media allies—many of whom labeled him an ‘anti-vaxxer’—Kennedy never backed down. ‘I’ve spent 20 years trying to get mercury out of vaccines,’ he declared… 

“Kennedy framed the decision as the beginning of a reform movement to restore public trust in federal health agencies… He called on global health bodies, particularly the World Health Organization and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, to end the use of mercury-based preservatives in vaccines administered to babies in developing countries… 

“The call comes just weeks after the Gates Foundation pledged $1.6 billion to GAVI, a global vaccine initiative that says it helps immunize children in poor countries. Gates [is] a longtime vaccine advocate and former associate of Jeffrey Epstein…” 

A good and much needed decision by Kennedy. 

Shroud of Turin Was Not Laid on Jesus’ Body 

The Daily Mail reported on August 1: 

“For centuries, devout Christians have flocked to the Italian city of Turin to pay their respects to one of the most famous relics in the world. The Shroud of Turin is a piece of linen, measuring 14ft 5in by 3ft 7in, that bears a faint image of the front and back of a man. Many believe that this image was created when Jesus was wrapped in the venerated shroud shortly after his death on the cross 2,000 years ago. 

“However, according to a new study, the Shroud of Turin was never laid on Jesus’ body. Brazilian 3D designer and researcher Cicero Moraes, an expert in reconstructing historical faces, says that the shroud is nothing more than a ‘masterpiece of Christian art’. Mr Moraes used digital modelling software to examine how cloth drapes over the human body compared to a low, flat sculpture of a body. These results… show that the shroud’s distinctive pattern could only have been produced by a sculpture.” 

Canada’s Shameful and Appalling Hypocrisy 

The New York Post wrote on August 2: 

“According to Canada’s top prosecutors, the only thing worse than tyranny is ‘mischief.’  And the worst possible ‘mischief’ is objecting to tyranny. 

“In a sentencing hearing earlier this week, the Canadian government sought a ludicrous eight-year sentence for Chris Barber, one of the leaders of the Covid ‘Freedom Convoy’ protest that riled Ottawa in early 2022. For another leader, Tamara Lich, the Crown asked for an outlandish seven years. 

“In April, a court ruled that Barbers and Lich were not guilty of obstructing police or intimidation during the demonstrations. But they were convicted of ‘mischief’ — in part because the truckers in the 40-mile convoy honked their horns to protest some of the most oppressive Covid mandates in the world… From the start of the pandemic, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau acted as if Covid entitled him to absolute power. Anyone who refused to get the approved Covid vaccines was castigated as a public enemy…. Banks were authorized to freeze the personal accounts of anyone suspected of donating to the truckers.  

“The Covid vaccines were catastrophically failing to prevent infections at the same time Trudeau dropped an iron fist on anti-vax protestors. Almost 90% of Canadian adults had been vaccinated by the start of 2022 as Covid cases were soaring… Even though he was vaxxed and boosted, Trudeau himself came down with Covid during the trucker protest. Trudeau pretended that no Canadian had a right not to get injected because he personally proclaimed that the Covid vaccine was safe. But the rushed approval process ignored potential adverse side effects. 

“In January 2024, Canadian federal judge Richard Mosley ruled that Trudeau’s use of the Emergencies Act had been unreasonable, illegal and unconstitutional. Trudeau’s regulations ‘criminalized the attendance of every single person at those protests regardless of their actions.’  The judge slammed ‘the absence of any objective standard’ for freezing bank accounts, but the court decision provided no relief for any of the victims whose bank accounts were unjustifiably seized or whose freedom and privacy was shredded. 

“America saw similar absolute immunity for politicians who fueled fear and fabricated emergencies to seize absolute power, including New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s disastrous decree forcing nursing homes to accept Covid patients, President Joe Biden’s illegal vaccine mandate for large private companies and Covid Czar Tony Fauci’s presidential pardon for sending U.S. tax dollars to the Wuhan Institute of Virology that killed 7 million people worldwide…” 

Appalling, shameful, disgusting, despicable. You name it. 

 Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

Update 1171

Comments on News and Prophecy, August 9, 2025 / A Story of Sacrifice

On August 9, 2025, Norbert Link will present the first message, titled, “Comments on News and Prophecy, August 9, 2025,” and Michael Link will present the sermon, titled, “A Story of Sacrifice.”

The live services are available, over video and audio, at http://eternalgod.org/live-services/ (12:30 pm Pacific Time; 1:30 pm Mountain Time; 2:30 pm Central Time; 3:30 pm Eastern Time; 8:30 pm Greenwich Mean Time; 9:30 pm Central European Time). Just click on Connect to Live Stream.

Back to top

The Law of Unintended Consequences

by Brian Gale (United Kingdom)

When men and women put themselves forward in political elections, if successful, they take on great responsibility.

The law of the land is already there, and they not only must uphold those laws, but they will be required to enact new laws, if deemed necessary.

Law is vital in any civilised society to avoid anarchy; most people will accept that, although we do hear of elected politicians who break the law and suffer the consequences.   Others just break the law, hoping to get away with their infraction.

When it comes to the Law of God, mainstream Christianity in general dismisses this as not being necessary, since it teaches that Jesus has done it all for us!  How blessed are we in the Church of God to know that we DO have to keep God’s Law!

Law is a vital part of life, whether people like it or not.  

And then there is the law of unintended consequences.

The Tutor2u website gives this definition: “The law of unintended consequences refers to the idea that actions or decisions can have unforeseen and unintended consequences, often in ways that are not immediately apparent. This can occur because complex systems often have multiple interconnected parts, and a change in one part of the system can have ripple effects that are difficult to predict.”   They give a number of examples, two of which are as follows:

  1. The minimum wage: A policy to increase the minimum wage may be intended to help low-wage workers, but it could also lead to unintended consequences such as businesses reducing their workforce or raising prices to offset the higher labor costs.
  2. Prohibition: The prohibition of alcohol in the United States in the 1920s was intended to reduce crime and social problems, but it had many unintended consequences, including the growth of organized crime and an increase in the consumption of illegal and potentially dangerous alcoholic beverages.

There are many examples on the internet. One was about India’s vultures, and it read as follows:

“In the mid-1990s India’s population of vultures began to die in droves. At first it was thought the animals were being killed off by a mysterious disease, but the culprit was eventually identified as an anti-inflammatory drug called diclofenac that was being administered to sick cattle.

“As the vultures scavenged meals from the cows that didn’t pull through, they consumed small quantities of the drug. A vulture’s stomach acid is capable of dissolving anthrax and cholera bacteria, but the slightest trace of diclofenac causes their kidneys to fail. In a matter of just a few years India’s vulture population plummeted from 40 million to just 100,000 birds.

“In India cattle are raised almost exclusively for dairy rather than meat, so when the beasts die their carcasses are left for scavengers. When the vultures all but disappeared, food was in plentiful supply for the millions of feral dogs that roam India in packs. More dogs meant more humans being bitten, and this in turn led to an increase in fatalities from rabies.

“The Indian Government banned the use of diclofenac in 2006, but the damage may prove to be irreversible. Despite the efforts of conservationists several species of vultures remain critically endangered.”

There were quite a few unintended consequences in that story.  

Bringing this right up-to-date, we read on thewoof.org how recent events in the USA have had such awful unintended circumstances for those animals which cannot look after themselves:

“One of the administration’s executive orders focuses on intensifying immigration enforcement, leading to an uptick in deportations and detentions. This surge has resulted in numerous pets being abandoned or surrendered when their owners are detained or deported.

“Animal shelters, especially in areas with large immigrant populations, are witnessing an influx of these displaced pets, stretching their already limited resources. The Guardian highlights cases where pets are left behind due to sudden deportations, emphasizing the emotional and logistical challenges faced by both the animals and shelter workers.”

Did the Trump administration even consider these consequences in their race to impose draconian measures that have been compared to Nazi Germany in the 1930s?   Probably not, but if they did, it would show how little regard they have for the welfare of God’s creatures.   Galatians 6:7 is clear: “…whatsoever a man sows, that he will also reap.”  Those involved will be held accountable for not only these appalling actions but all the others that are currently being foisted on the human race with no regard for the welfare of some of God’s creatures.

BBC News reported on 12th April 2025 that “An animal sanctuary has said it is bracing itself for ‘another tidal wave of rescue cases’ if Donald Trump’s trade tariffs put extra financial pressure on UK pet owners.

“Woodlands Animal Sanctuary in Holmeswood, Lancashire, said existing cost-of-living pressures had made the past winter much busier than previous years, and that its cattery was full by March.

“The sanctuary said 90% of the animals it had taken in were given up by owners who could no longer afford to keep them or who were facing eviction from their homes.”

There are so many problems in the world today, and decisions taken on another matter, in another country, can have devastating effects elsewhere. 

Animal welfare is just one of them, but it can be heartbreaking to consider that because of the law of unintended consequences, decisions taken about one issue can unexpectedly affect those which completely rely on man for their existence.

There seems to be, so much of the time, very little kindness in the world today, and the treatment of animals is right up there with so many other examples.  Kindness is a godly quality, mentioned many times in the Bible, and one that can be most ignored.   And recent events where people are arrested without regard for the welfare of the animals affected and left behind is just one of so many actions that would come under the law of unintended consequences.

We can learn from this so that when we make decisions, we consider every facet that that decision will bring about.   This is especially true in our spiritual lives which must be of paramount importance.

When Jesus returns and sets up the soon-coming Kingdom of God, decisions will then be made on a godly basis with every consideration taken into account when action is required, and the law of unintended consequences will not be applicable!

Back to top

by Norbert Link

We begin with Trump’s furious reaction to the new unfavorable job report and continue with his tariffs policy which is backfiring on America; his new (proposed) tariff rates; and an interesting development regarding a pending court decision on the constitutionality of his tariffs. We also report further on the “deal” between the EU and the USA. Please view our recent StandingWatch program, titled,  “US-EU Trade Deal—Biggest Deal Ever Made, or a Disaster?”

We speak on the turmoil in the Middle East (especially related to Palestine; Hamas and Gaza); actions in the Far East; fights between Republicans and Democrats; more discrepancies in the Epstein debacle; and conclude with new discoveries regarding the Shroud of Turin and Canada’s [and America’s] appalling hypocrisy related to their Covid policies; as well as a welcome decision by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Throughout this section, we have underlined pertinent statements in the quoted articles, for the convenience and quick overview of the reader.  

Back to top

Job Report Not to Trump’s Liking 

The Daily Mail wrote on August 1: 

“The president is taking out his frustration on Dr. Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of labor statistics, who was appointed to the role by former President Joe Biden. He accused her of ‘faking’ jobs numbers before the 2024 election to ‘try and boost Kamala’s chances of victory,’ in a blistering post to Truth Social that did not provide evidence of the stunning accusation… 

“Hiring growth dropped dramatically last month and unemployment ticked up, the latest jobs report released on Friday showed. Non-farm payrolls added 73,000 in July, far lower than the 100,000 expected by analysts. The unemployment rate also ticked up to 4.2 percent. The report also sharply revised down the figures for May and June by a combined 258,000 jobs from the previously released figures. 

“Following the revision June’s total was left at just 14,000 and May’s at 19,000 — effectively flat. Analysts say July’s figure is also likely to be revised lower, possibly into negative territory.

Trump hammered the economist for those revisions, although they are routine in the government’s monthly job reports – sometimes going up, sometimes going down as businesses around the country report on their payrolls. .. The latest figures suggest cracks are in fact starting to show up in the economy, despite a slew of previous better-than-expected economic data released recently… 

“It is just the latest example of Trump demanding that even traditionally independent parts of the government bend to his preferences – although a president who is denied bad information about the unemployment situation would be deprived timely information to change course for their own political benefit.”

“Trump Lies About Labor Statistics Chief” 

The Guardian wrote on August 2: 

“Speaking to reporters on Friday, Donald Trump defended his decision to fire Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of labor statistics, and falsely accused her of having released reports just before the 2024 election that overstated the number of new jobs created by the Biden-Harris administration. Asked by a reporter, ‘Why did you fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics?’ Trump replied: ‘Because I think her numbers were wrong, just like I thought her numbers were wrong before the election.’

“The president then went on to give a wildly inaccurate account of the jobs data released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in 2024. ‘Days before the election, she came out with these beautiful numbers for Kamala, I guess Biden-Kamala, and she came out with these beautiful numbers trying to get somebody else elected,’ Trump said, entirely misrepresenting the jobs report released on 1 November 2024, four days before the election, which in fact showed the US added just 12,000 jobs over the previous month. 

“At the time, the Trump campaign called the jobs report ‘a catastrophe’ that ‘definitively reveals how badly Kamala Harris broke our economy.’ On Friday, however, the president offered a very different account of that report released just nine months ago. ‘Then, right after the election,’ Trump claimed, ‘she had an 8- or 900,000 dollar [sic] massive reduction, said she made a mistake.’ 

“What Trump was misremembering is a Bureau of Labor Statistics announcement, on 21 August 2024, that updated data showed that there had been 818,000 fewer jobs added in the US in the previous year than it had initially estimated. That downward revision was large, but part of an annual process, in which the bureau updates its initial estimates when it gets better data.

“The same day that revision was announced in 2024, Trump [posted] that the Biden-Harris administration had been ‘caught fraudulently manipulating Job Statistics’ and the ‘New Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that the Administration PADDED THE NUMBERS with an extra 818,000 Jobs that DO NOT EXIST, AND NEVER DID.’ On Friday, however, Trump repeatedly insisted that the August revision had not come until after the November election…” 

Express wrote on August 2: 

“Pressure inside the White House has risen once again as Donald Trump erupted, sacking the head of the US statistics agency after they released data about the nation’s weakening jobs market… [despite] zero evidence that any data was tampered with…

“His brash move has triggered concerns for bankers and markets around the world, who believe Trump may now interfere in the publishing of financial stats and reports that decide the prices of a wide variety of assets.” 

This will contribute to America’s economic downfall. 

Trump’s Tariffs Policy Backfires 

The New York Post wrote on August 1, 2025: 

“New cracks emerged in the U.S. economy on Friday after the government reported a significant slowdown in job growth, a sign of the serious and accelerating effects of President Trump’s punishing new tariffs... The jobs data offered only the latest indication that Mr. Trump’s policies, particularly his expanding global trade war, had started to put the squeeze on the economy. Tariffs are taxes on imports, paid by U.S. companies purchasing those goods abroad. Other economic data released this week offered fresh evidence that Mr. Trump’s duties had slowed trade and started to send prices higher… 

“Adding to its challenges, the president late Thursday announced a dramatic widening of his trade war, slapping major new tariffs on dozens of countries that take effect on Aug. 7. Switzerland was stunned by a 39 percent tariff, among the highest. Syria, Laos and Myanmar were handed rates of 40 to 41 percent… Earlier in the week, Mr. Trump imposed 50 percent tariffs on Brazil as punishment for its prosecution of Jair Bolsonaro, his ally, who is accused of plotting a coup after he lost the last presidential election.”

New Tariff Rates… For Now! 

The New York Post wrote on August 1: 

“Among the notable rates that will be charged at 12:01 a.m. Aug. 7 — rather than on the Friday deadline initially announced by the White House — are 15% for Iceland and Israel, 30% for South Africa, 39% for Switzerland and 20% for Taiwan and Vietnam… 

“The steepest tariff rates will be carried by Syria (41%), Laos and Myanmar (40%), Switzerland (39%) and Iraq and Serbia (35%). The list also denotes a 35% rate on imports from Canada after Trump signed an order upping the current tariff by 10 percentage points.” 

More and more Americans are waking up to the fact that Trump’s economic policies just don’t work and are harmful to America. Note the next article. 

Most Americans Unhappy with Trump 

The Guardian wrote on August 1: 

“Americans are struggling financially, grappling with debt and the rising cost of living, and are blaming the Trump administration and corporate interests for worsening economic outlooks for working families, according to a new poll. Six out of 10 Americans place blame on the Trump administration for driving up their cost of living, according to a poll conducted by Morning Consult for the Century Foundation… 

Sixty three per cent said Trump had had a negative impact on grocery prices, and 61% said he had had a negative impact on the cost of living. Nearly half, 49%, said the Trump administration had had a negative impact on their finances. Nearly eight out of 10 Americans, including 70% of Republicans, fear that Trump’s tariffs will increase the price of everyday goods. ‘Donald Trump has simultaneously raised prices on everyday goods through a reckless approach to tariffs, a decimation of programs that help Americans afford healthcare, education, food and childcare, and then kneecapping federal regulators who keep banks and other big businesses from swindling consumers,’ said Julie Margetta Morgan, president of the Century Foundation…

“According to the poll, more than six out of 10 Americans said it had become more difficult to find a good paying job, buy a home and afford childcare. More than four out of five Americans, 83% said they were concerned about the cost of groceries, with 46% saying they were very concerned. Some 47% said they were worried about being able to pay their rent or mortgage64% said they were worried about affording an unexpected medical expense. 

About 48% said they believed they would have trouble affording an unexpected $500 bill without borrowing. One in four said it would be ‘very difficult’… Americans also fear things are getting worse economically, with 76% of those polled saying they fear a looming economic recession…” 

These are terrible figures, but sadly, they reflect reality. 

Switzerland Faces Unpredictable Bad-Tempered Trump 

The Guardian wrote on August 4: 

“Switzerland, home to some of the world’s best-known luxury brands, was left stunned after the US president on Friday imposed one of the highest tariff rates [39%] in his global trade reset. Industry associations said tens of thousands of jobs were at risk. 

“Local media had reported that after three months of talks, negotiators believed they had secured a 10% tariff on exports to the US, a key market for Swiss products such as luxury watches, jewelry and chocolate but also machinery and pharmaceuticals. But after a 30-minute call with Keller-Sutter on Thursday evening variously described as ‘bad-tempered’, ‘disastrous’ and ‘badly misjudged’, Trump imposed a levy even higher than the 31% he had announced on his so-called ‘liberation day’ in April… 

“Analysts have said tariffs could still change at any moment because of the unpredictability of the Trump administration…” 

A subsequent meeting between Marco Rubio and Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter in Washington did not result in any changes.

India Not Happy 

Breitbart wrote on August 1: 

“President Donald Trump increased the pressure on [Prime Minister Narendra] Modi on Wednesday by threatening to impose a 25% tariff on Indian imports, plus additional penalties if India continues to do business with Russia… Trump… castigated India for buying the ‘vast majority of their military equipment from Russia,’ and he seemed to accuse the Indians of financing the invasion of Ukraine by purchasing large quantities of Russian oil… 

“In another Truth Social post, Trump appeared to wash his hands of India altogether. ‘I don’t care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care,’ he grumbled…” 

The New York Times wrote on August 3:

“Indian officials said on Saturday that they would keep purchasing cheap oil from Russia despite a threat of penalties from President Trump, the latest twist in an issue that New Delhi thought it had settled… 

“India has drastically increased its purchases of Russian oil since the Kremlin invaded Ukraine. Russia is now the source of more than one-third of India’s oil imports — up from less than 1 percent before the war. It brings in about two million barrels of crude oil a day, making it the second largest importer of Russian oil, after China.” 

Newsmax wrote on August 4: 

“President Donald Trump said on Monday he will substantially raise tariffs on India over its purchases of Russian oil. ‘India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don’t care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine,’ Trump said in a post on Truth Social.”

India will become part of the kings of the East, joining Russia, China and other Far Eastern nations. 

Court of Appeals to Decide on Trump’s Tariffs 

Politico wrote on July 31: 

“Federal appeals court judges on Thursday sharply questioned President Donald Trump’s authority to impose sweeping tariffs on foreign trading partners under an unprecedented use of emergency powers. Several judges of the Washington, D.C.-based Federal Circuit Court of Appeals repeatedly wondered how Trump could justify the broad tariffs using a 1977 law known as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, that presidents have used to set economic sanctions and other penalties on foreign countries — but never previously tariffs… 

“However, the 11 judges vigorously questioned attorneys for the states and the private companies as well… 

“The New York-based U.S. Court of International Trade ruled in May that Trump had exceeded his authority under IEEPA to impose the tariffs and ordered them to be vacated. The Trump administration appealed that ruling to the Federal Circuit, which allowed the government to continue collecting the duties while the case proceeds. The appeals court set a rapid-fire schedule to consider the matter in front of the court’s full 11-member bench, which is made up of eight Democratic appointees, three Republican appointees and no Trump appointees. The lawsuit is expected to end up at the Supreme Court.” 

A decision of the Court of Appeals is expected to be announced in August. 

Focus wrote on August 1: 

“The court could prohibit Trump from pursuing the tariff war. Then the 15 percent tariffs on most goods would also be invalidated [including those against the EU and Germany] … Trump is imposing his tariffs… without parliamentary approval… In parliament, the Republicans hold a narrow majority in both chambers (Senate and House of Representatives). This majority could be enough for Trump to push through his tariffs after all. 

“However, the next elections are scheduled for 2026. Parliament will largely be re-elected. The parliamentarians must already seek re-election. Trump’s tariffs are also rather unpopular among Republican voters. It is possible that some Republican dissidents will oppose Trump… Even if the appeals court rules against Trump, the tariff war is likely to continue to occupy Germany for a long time.” 

Meaning, the relationship between the USA and Germany will continue to deteriorate drastically. 

US-EU Deal Unenforceable 

Politico wrote on July 28: 

“The European Union has admitted it doesn’t have the power to deliver on a promise to invest $600 billion in the United States economy, only hours after making the pledge at landmark trade talks in Scotland. That’s because the cash would come entirely from private sector investment over which Brussels has no authority… ‘It is not something that the EU as a public authority can guarantee. It is something which is based on the intentions of the private companies,’ said one of the senior Commission officials. The Commission has not said it will introduce any incentives to ensure the private sector meets that $600 billion target, nor given a precise timeframe for the investment… 

“The Commission pointed out that the figure would come from private companies, not European taxpayers, contrasting with Japan’s promise to mobilize $550 billion of both public and private investments in the U.S. as part of a recently agreed trade deal.

“But the idea that the private sector can be relied upon to provide that level of investment was met with skepticism… ‘[The EU] is not China, right? So nobody can tell private companies how much they invest in the U.S.’...” 

In addition, all 27 EU member states would have to approve the deal. Some, like France, Hungary and now even Germany have expressed reservations. 

Trump Threatens EU 

The New York Post wrote on August 5: 

“President Trump warned Tuesday that if the European Union fails to deliver on its commitment to invest $600 billion in the US,  he will ramp up tariffs against the 27-nation bloc… ‘Then they pay tariffs of 35%,’ Trump [said] when asked what would happen if the EU doesn’t pony up. ‘They brought down their tariffs, so they paid $600 billion and because of that, I reduced their tariffs from 30% down to 15%,’ the president explained. 

“‘They gave me $600 billion and that’s a gift. … They gave us $600 billion that we can invest in anything we want.’… ‘The details are $600 billion to invest in anything I want. Anything. I can do anything I want with it,’ Trump reiterated when pressed for more specifics…” 

EuroNews wrote on August 5: 

“The European Commission is unable to design and implement investments on behalf of the private sector. The $600 billion has been described by the Commission as an indication based on the executive’s contacts with industry. ‘It’s not something the EU, as a public authority, can guarantee – it’s something based on the intention of private companies,’ a senior official said last week.” 

Euractiv wrote on August 5: 

“An official White House account of the deal also states that the EU has committed to purchase  ‘significant amounts of US military equipment’ – a claim rejected by Brussels.” 

NPR wrote on August 5: 

“Four European countries have agreed to buy $1 billion worth of U.S. weapons and send them to Ukraine… ‘We already have commitments from the Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, and Denmark – over one billion dollars for American weapons that Ukraine will receive…’, Zelenskyy wrote on X.” 

Major Tourist Visa Change 

MSN wrote on August 4: 

“The State Department is proposing a rule requiring some business and tourist visa applicants to post a bond of up to $15,000 to enter the United States, a step critics say could put the process out of reach for many… The new visa bond program will take effect on August 20… 

“Under the plan, U.S. consular officers can require a bond from visa applicants who meet certain criteria. This includes nationals of countries with high visa overstay rates, countries with deficient screening and vetting, and those that offer citizenship-by-investment programs, particularly where citizenship is granted without a residency requirement. Visitors subject to the bond will receive it back upon leaving the U.S., naturalizing as a citizen, or in the event of death. If a traveler overstays, however, the bond may be forfeited and used to help cover the costs associated with their removal… 

“Citizens of countries in the Visa Waiver Program are exempt, and consular officers will retain the discretion to waive the bond on a case-by-case basis… The list of affected countries will be published at least 15 days before the program begins and may be updated with similar notice. In the 2020 version of the pilot, countries such as Afghanistan, Angola, Burkina Faso, Burma (Myanmar), Chad, Congo, Eritrea, Iran, Laos, Liberia, Libya, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen were included.” 

Ex-Obama Officials Face Federal Grand Jury Probe 

The New York Post wrote on August 4: 

“The Justice Department is opening a federal grand jury investigation of former Obama administration officials… including former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey… 

“Trump and current DNI Tulsi Gabbard have called for a federal probe into the early days of the Russia collusion probe dubbed ‘Crossfire Hurricane’… The president has accused the former officials of a treasonous and seditious conspiracy to undermine his first-term agenda, which ultimately led to more than two years of leaky investigations before special counsel Robert Mueller turned up no evidence of collusion…

Treason does not have a statute of limitations, but no American has been convicted of that charge since 1949. It’s possible that prosecutors could develop a novel legal theory to revive seemingly expired charges, as performed by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg last year when he won a 34-count felony conviction against Trump for falsifying business records to conceal 2016 hush money payments.”

Banks Debanked Trump

The New York Post wrote on August 5:

“JPMorgan and Bank of America  ‘debanked’ President Trump for his role in the January 6 Capitol Hill melee following pressure from the Biden administration’s banking regulators and the Federal Reserve… sources at the banks — the largest and second-largest in the US in terms of assets — confirmed… threats from President Joe Biden’s bank regulators that banking the former president’s money put them in danger of falling afoul of rules that prohibit financial institutions from doing business with individuals and companies that present a ‘reputational risk.’…

“Trump himself revealed that he was debanked… He said he was denied services at both institutions sometime after his first term ended in January 2021, just weeks after the storming of the Capitol…  First, he said, he was booted by JPMorgan. ‘I had 100s of millions. I had many, many accounts loaded up with cash. I was loaded up with cash, and they told me, “I’m sorry, sir, we can’t have you. You have 20 days to get out.” I said, “You’ve got to be kidding. I’ve been with you for 35, 40 years.”’ Then he was denied services by Bank of America…. 

“Trump and his regulators have sought to end the practice and he’s issuing an executive order imminently to end politically motivated debanking.”

This is really outrageous. Trump’s executive order would be more than overdue. 

Fight Between Republicans and Democrats Intensifies in Texas 

Texas Tribune wrote on August 4: 

“The Texas House voted Monday afternoon to track down and arrest more than 50 Democratic lawmakers who were not present when the chamber gaveled in. After the 85-6 vote, House Speaker Dustin Burrows said he would immediately sign civil warrants for each of the legislators, empowering the chamber’s sergeant-at-arms and state troopers to arrest and bring them to the Capitol. They will not face civil or criminal charges from the arrests. The warrants apply only within state lines, making them largely symbolic as most of the legislators in question decamped to Illinois, New York and Massachusetts to forestall passage of the GOP’s proposed redraw of Texas’ congressional map… 

“The current congressional map, drawn by a Republican-dominated Legislature in 2021, has netted 25 GOP seats in the last two elections. But after pressure from President Donald Trump’s team, Abbott directed lawmakers to redraw the map during the special legislative session, which started July 21. Last week, the House proposed new congressional lines dividing up existing districts in Austin, Houston and Dallas with the aim of netting five more Republican seats… 

“Rep. Gene Wu, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, said in a statement Sunday, accusing Abbott of ‘using an intentionally racist map to steal the voices of millions of Black and Latino Texans, all to execute a corrupt political deal.’… The departed House members will face fines of $500 for each day that they miss, as well as the threat of reprimand, censure and expulsion, although that would require a two-thirds vote among members.” 

Newsmax wrote on August 6: 

“Defiant [Democratic] House members remaining absent from the Texas Legislature stand to be fined nearly $400,000, according to the state chamber’s rules… A total of 57 Democrats skipped Monday’s session, bringing the penalties to $28,500.” 

CNN wrote on August 5: 

“For a second day in a row the Texas House failed to reach a quorum as dozens of Democrats have left the state in protest over GOP plans to potentially eliminate five Democratic US House seats ahead of the 2026 midterm elections… Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said he would seek court rulings against the Democrats if they don’t return by Friday ‘ensuring that their seats are declared vacant.’…” 

This would be an unprecedented and, legal experts say, likely futile effort requiring individual lawsuits against each member and new elections to fill their seats 

Two US Nuclear Submarines Positioned to Reach Russia 

Express wrote on August 1: 

“The war of words between US President Donald Trump and Dmitry Medvedev, a close ally of Vladimir Putin, escalated on Friday evening. The American leader announced on the platform Truth Social that he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned ‘in appropriate regions’ in light of ‘foolish and inflammatory statements’ coming from Russia… It comes after Medvedev warned Mr Trump to remember Russia has Soviet-era nuclear strike capabilities of last resort. That came after Mr Trump told Medvedev to ‘watch his words’… 

“[Medvedev] said Mr Trump should remember how dangerous the fabled ‘Dead Hand’ can be. This was a reference to a secretive Russian command system designed to launch nuclear missiles if Russia’s leadership were to be taken out in an enemy strike.” 

It won’t come to that. No major war between the USA and Russia, let alone a nuclear war, is prophesied in the Bible. But, a nuclear war between Russia and a German-led Europe IS foretold in Scripture. 

Russia and China Begin War Games 

MSN wrote on August 4: 

“Russia and China are staging mock combat drills and other war games in the Sea of Japan in a sign of strengthening military ties. 

“Though pre-planned, the joint naval exercises that began on Sunday came a day after Donald Trump moved US nuclear submarines closer to Russia in response to inflammatory comments from Russia’s former president Dmitry Medvedev.”  

Putin Moves Nuclear Bombers Closer to Europe

Express wrote on August 4: 

“Vladimir Putin has moved at least four heavy Tu-95MS nuclear bombers closer to Europe. 

“The strategic aircraft are often used to bomb Ukraine, and Insider UA says they have been loaded with missiles, leading to a ‘high probability’ of an imminent major attack.” 

“Only 16% of Germans Would ‘Definitely’ Fight for Country” 

Deutsche Welle wrote on August 4: 

“Around one in six Germans say they would join the military in the event of a conflict or a call to arms, a new survey… recorded that 16% of participants said they would ‘definitely’ fight, while another 22% said they would ‘probably’ do so. 

“However, 59% said they would ‘probably not’ or definitely not be willing to defend Germany in the event of an attack… More than one in four respondents (27%) said they considered a military attack on Germany within the next five years to be very or somewhat likely. Meanwhile, 59% of respondents said they felt it was likely that Germany would have to provide military assistance to another NATO member.” 

These results make little sense. But these “opinions” are only temporary anyhow.  

Recognizing Palestine? 

The New York Post wrote on August 1: 

“French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced this week that their countries would unilaterally recognize a Palestinian state. The first problem with that is ‘Palestine’ is a fictional place. There never was any such thing… 

“What happens when a civil war breaks out? Because the prospects are quite high… The French and Brits should recall that the first thing Gazans did when handed a protostate in 2005 was to destroy over 3,000 greenhouses and modern farming systems that American Jews had purchased for $14 million and handed them, gratis. The second thing they did, though, was put Hamas in charge.

“So, will France and Britain support open elections in this new nation?… What if Hamas, or some other iteration of that organization, wins those elections? Will France and Britain recognize such a state?… 

“Is France or Britain going to disarm Hamas? Is France or Britain going to bring back the more than 50 hostages still being held and tortured in Gaza?…” 

Canada has also declared that they want to recognize a Palestinian state. Germany has said that they are supporting a two-state solution. But a two-state solution is fiction. Israel does not want it, and neither do Hamas and the Palestinians. They want a one-state solution—without Israel. 

Hamas Sabotages Humanitarian Supplies 

Nius wrote on August 2: 

“The German government has increased its concern about the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip. Government spokesman Stefan Kornelius stated that despite ‘initial slight progress’ in providing aid to the population, the emergency remains acute. Of particular concern is the systematic diversion of aid supplies by Hamas and other criminal organizations, which are blocking urgently needed aid for the civilian population. 

“According to German security sources, a significant portion of the aid supplies entering the Gaza Strip are stolen by Hamas and other groups. 50 to 100 percent of the aid is intercepted by armed forces or criminal organizations, according to a security insider. Since May 19, a total of 2,010 trucks carrying aid from the United Nations have entered the Gaza Strip. However, official UN figures show that only 260 of these trucks reached their destination. The majority, approximately 1,753 trucks, were forcibly intercepted by armed forces. These goods then often end up on the black market and do not reach the affected civilian population.” 

But it’s easy to blame Israel for this as well. Anti-Semitism is in high gear. 

Prayer on the Temple Mount 

BBC News wrote on August 4: 

“Israel’s far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir has visited the al-Aqsa Mosque compound in Jerusalem and prayed there, violating a decades-old arrangement covering one of the most sensitive sites in the Middle East. Photos and videos of his visit show Ben-Gvir leading Jewish prayers at the compound, which is known by Jews as the Temple Mount, in occupied East Jerusalem. Praying at the site breaks a long-time arrangement that allows Jews to visit the site but not pray. 

“The Israeli prime minister’s office released a statement saying there had been no change to Israel’s policy of maintaining the status quo agreement that allows only Muslim worship there. Jordan, custodian of the site, called Ben-Gvir’s latest visit ‘an unacceptable provocation’. Hamas called it ‘a deepening of the ongoing aggressions against our Palestinian people’, while a spokesperson for Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said the visit ‘crossed all red lines’. 

“The site is the holiest place for Jews because it was the site of two Biblical temples. It is the third holiest place for Muslims, who believe it was where the Prophet Muhammad ascended to heaven. It was captured by Israel from Jordan in the 1967 Middle East war… Palestinians… complain that in recent years Jewish visitors have often been seen praying without being stopped by Israeli police. The Waqf, the Islamic endowment which runs the site, said Ben-Gvir was among 1,250 Jews who ascended the compound on Sunday morning. Ben-Gvir, an ultra-nationalist who as national security minister oversees the police, has visited the site before, but the Times of Israel reported this was the first time that he openly prayed at the site. He was flanked by police officers while entering and touring the compound. 

“In a statement at the site, Ben-Gvir said ‘horror’ video of hostages recently released by Hamas, in which they appear emaciated, were aimed at putting pressure on Israel, and called for the hostages’ return. The minister also repeated his call for Israel to occupy the whole of the Gaza Strip (so is Netanyahu) and to encourage what he described as ‘voluntary emigration’ of Palestinians from the territory…” 

Why is it that Muslims are allowed to pray on the Temple Mount, but Jews are not?

More Discrepancies in the Epstein Tale 

The Daily Beast wrote on August 1: 

A mystery third person was spotted on camera in jailhouse footage from Jeffrey Epstein’s final night alive, a CBS News investigation has revealed. The person, who was not identified or even mentioned in a Department of Justice investigative report, is seen entering a common area near where Epstein’s cell was located just after 4 a.m. on Aug. 10, 2019, two hours before he was found dead. 

“A CBS analysis of footage determined that the guards on duty, Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, did not unlock a door to let the unknown person into the Special Housing Unit within the Metropolitan Correctional Center. That reportedly contradicts what Noel told the DOJ, when she said that the opening of the door to the area ‘requires a physical key.’ Without the key, which was supposedly only accessible to Noel and Thomas, it is unclear how the mystery person entered the unit

“Footage released by the government this month comes from a security camera that did not have a visual on the entire common area for Epstein’s unit. It recorded the guard’s desk, which was a floor below where Epstein was held, and only a sliver of the staircase that led to the convicted sex offender’s cell block. The limited footage is extremely grainy, making it challenging to analyze movements in the area. 

“CBS notes that the lone security camera with footage—the DOJ says other cameras were broadcast live to a security center, but their footage was lost—did not capture enough of the staircase leading to Epstein’s cell block to say definitively that the mystery person did not approach it. ‘There is no way to know from the video if it indeed was possible for someone to enter the unit and climb the stairs to Epstein’s cell without being seen,’ the network reported…

“White House officials from the administrations of both Joe Biden and Donald Trump have said that all evidence points to Epstein’s cause of death being a suicide. Still, debate over whether the alleged sex trafficker died via suicide or was murdered—as his brother, Mark, and many MAGA figures believe—has been widely debated. The CBS analysis includes the expertise of video forensics specialists. They said they saw multiple issues with the government’s conclusions about what went down on Epstein’s final night alive. Among the reported ‘discrepancies’ was a mysterious ‘orange shape’ that was recorded ascending the stairs to where Epstein’s cell was located… 

“Despite the guards on duty being required to check on Epstein every half-hour, as he was on suicide watch and temporarily did not have a cell-mate, the DOJ said no guards checked on him that night. His body was found at breakfast the next morning…” 

at.com reported on August 1: 

“President Donald Trump’s name [as well as the names of other prominent public figures were] redacted ‘numerous times’ in the Jeffrey Epstein files by an FBI team determining which information potentially could be released to the public, according to an explosive report published Friday.” 

It was also revealed that the redaction took place before it was announced that “no further disclosure” of the Epstein files “would be appropriate or warranted” (Common Dreams, August 1). 

Newsmax wrote on August 6: 

“Maxwell… reportedly told Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche during their interview last month that President Donald Trump never did anything inappropriate in her presence… Maxwell, who is serving 20 years in prison after being convicted of sexually trafficking minors, further said nothing that could be considered harmful to the president…” 

Her attempt to get a pardon or at least leniency is obvious. 

Kennedy Bans Mercury in Vaccines 

Breitbart wrote on August 2: 

“Robert F. Kennedy Jr…. confirmed the move on Saturday, blasting federal health agencies for allowing a known neurotoxin to be injected into pregnant women and children for decades… Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that thimerosal, a mercury based preservative still found in flu shots given to children and pregnant women, has now been fully banned in the United States… 

“A… study found that this highly toxic mercury remains in the brain for over 27 years. Kennedy cited a CDC-funded 2017 study linking flu shots during pregnancy to miscarriage, which found the odds of miscarriage within 28 days were 7.7 times higher for women who received the vaccine. He also referenced a 2017 study… that reported an elevated risk of autism spectrum disorders in children whose mothers received a flu shot during the first trimester…

“Despite intense pressure and smears from the pharmaceutical industry and its media allies—many of whom labeled him an ‘anti-vaxxer’—Kennedy never backed down. ‘I’ve spent 20 years trying to get mercury out of vaccines,’ he declared… 

“Kennedy framed the decision as the beginning of a reform movement to restore public trust in federal health agencies… He called on global health bodies, particularly the World Health Organization and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, to end the use of mercury-based preservatives in vaccines administered to babies in developing countries… 

“The call comes just weeks after the Gates Foundation pledged $1.6 billion to GAVI, a global vaccine initiative that says it helps immunize children in poor countries. Gates [is] a longtime vaccine advocate and former associate of Jeffrey Epstein…” 

A good and much needed decision by Kennedy. 

Shroud of Turin Was Not Laid on Jesus’ Body 

The Daily Mail reported on August 1: 

“For centuries, devout Christians have flocked to the Italian city of Turin to pay their respects to one of the most famous relics in the world. The Shroud of Turin is a piece of linen, measuring 14ft 5in by 3ft 7in, that bears a faint image of the front and back of a man. Many believe that this image was created when Jesus was wrapped in the venerated shroud shortly after his death on the cross 2,000 years ago. 

“However, according to a new study, the Shroud of Turin was never laid on Jesus’ body. Brazilian 3D designer and researcher Cicero Moraes, an expert in reconstructing historical faces, says that the shroud is nothing more than a ‘masterpiece of Christian art’. Mr Moraes used digital modelling software to examine how cloth drapes over the human body compared to a low, flat sculpture of a body. These results… show that the shroud’s distinctive pattern could only have been produced by a sculpture.” 

Canada’s Shameful and Appalling Hypocrisy 

The New York Post wrote on August 2: 

“According to Canada’s top prosecutors, the only thing worse than tyranny is ‘mischief.’  And the worst possible ‘mischief’ is objecting to tyranny. 

“In a sentencing hearing earlier this week, the Canadian government sought a ludicrous eight-year sentence for Chris Barber, one of the leaders of the Covid ‘Freedom Convoy’ protest that riled Ottawa in early 2022. For another leader, Tamara Lich, the Crown asked for an outlandish seven years. 

“In April, a court ruled that Barbers and Lich were not guilty of obstructing police or intimidation during the demonstrations. But they were convicted of ‘mischief’ — in part because the truckers in the 40-mile convoy honked their horns to protest some of the most oppressive Covid mandates in the world… From the start of the pandemic, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau acted as if Covid entitled him to absolute power. Anyone who refused to get the approved Covid vaccines was castigated as a public enemy…. Banks were authorized to freeze the personal accounts of anyone suspected of donating to the truckers.  

“The Covid vaccines were catastrophically failing to prevent infections at the same time Trudeau dropped an iron fist on anti-vax protestors. Almost 90% of Canadian adults had been vaccinated by the start of 2022 as Covid cases were soaring… Even though he was vaxxed and boosted, Trudeau himself came down with Covid during the trucker protest. Trudeau pretended that no Canadian had a right not to get injected because he personally proclaimed that the Covid vaccine was safe. But the rushed approval process ignored potential adverse side effects. 

“In January 2024, Canadian federal judge Richard Mosley ruled that Trudeau’s use of the Emergencies Act had been unreasonable, illegal and unconstitutional. Trudeau’s regulations ‘criminalized the attendance of every single person at those protests regardless of their actions.’  The judge slammed ‘the absence of any objective standard’ for freezing bank accounts, but the court decision provided no relief for any of the victims whose bank accounts were unjustifiably seized or whose freedom and privacy was shredded. 

“America saw similar absolute immunity for politicians who fueled fear and fabricated emergencies to seize absolute power, including New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s disastrous decree forcing nursing homes to accept Covid patients, President Joe Biden’s illegal vaccine mandate for large private companies and Covid Czar Tony Fauci’s presidential pardon for sending U.S. tax dollars to the Wuhan Institute of Virology that killed 7 million people worldwide…” 

Appalling, shameful, disgusting, despicable. You name it. 

 Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

Back to top

Faithfulness in small things – why is that so important?

If God gave me something great – whatever we imagine to be great; whether it be a wife or a husband, a lot of money, a house, or a position in the Church or at work –, then I would give it my best! We may have said this before or thought it. I would be ready for more. I would love to serve God with something significant.

But Jesus draws our attention to an important connection. In Luke 16:10, he says, “He who is faithful in what is least is faithful also in much; and he who is unjust in what is least is unjust also in much.”

Jesus is referring to the principle of faithfulness here. And He makes it clear that faithfulness does not begin with big, admirable tasks. It begins with the small things, in the hidden places, in everyday life.

The very little things are the small moments in our lives that seem insignificant: how we handle our money, how we talk about people when they are not present, how we manage our time, whether we keep our promises, whether we pray, whether we keep the temple of our body clean. It is often the inconspicuous decisions that say a lot about our character.

God does not look at the outward size of a task, but at the attitude of the heart with which we approach it. The question isn’t: How great is what we do? But rather, are we faithful in it? Jesus says that our behavior in small things reflects our inner state.

Those who are unjust in small things, that is, careless, complacent, dishonest, will also be so in big things. Conversely, those who prove themselves faithful in small things show that they are also ready for greater responsibility.

In Luke 19:17, Jesus emphasizes this principle again. In the parable of the talents, the Lord says to his servant: “… ‘Well done, good servant; because you were faithful in a very little, have authority over ten cities.’”

In Matthew 25:21, Jesus also calls out to the faithful servant in the parable: “… ‘Well done, good and faithful servant; you were faithful over a few things, I will make you ruler over many things. Enter into the joy of your lord.’”

This means that being faithful in small things is not insignificant, but preparation – the door to greater blessings, greater responsibility, and greater impact. God tests our hearts through small things. They are not unimportant; they are crucial.

This is also evident in Proverbs 28:20, which says, “A faithful man will abound with blessings, But he who hastens to be rich will not go unpunished.” Faithfulness bears fruit in the long run. On the other hand, those who are only interested in quick profits or outward success are easily tempted. God honors the faithful heart.

But we live in a world where often only the big things count – big projects, big visibility. However, in God’s Kingdom, things work differently. There, it is not size alone that matters, but character. Not influence, but integrity. Not applause, but faithfulness.

Paul also addresses this topic. In 1 Corinthians 4:2, he writes: “Moreover it is required in stewards that one be found faithful.”

When God entrusts people with tasks, reliability is His most important criterion. It is not how spectacularly someone acts, but how faithfully they use and pass on what has been entrusted to them.

That is why it is dangerous to say: Once I am given a big task, I will take it seriously. Because our behavior in small things will be repeated in big things. Those who are careless, imprecise or complacent today will be so tomorrow, only with greater responsibility and greater impact.

If we want to serve God, it starts today with small decisions. Am I reliable in my everyday life? Am I honest in small things, friendly to people? Romans 12:18 says: “If it is possible, as much as depends on you, live peaceably with all men.”

Faithfulness is also shown in not giving up when immediate results are not visible. Paul encourages Christians in Galatians 6:9 with the words: “And let us not grow weary while doing good, for in due season we shall reap if we do not lose heart.”

This means that there will be a harvest, but it will come later. Faithfulness is the way to get there.

We should also serve God in our everyday lives and at work. Paul writes in Colossians 3:23-24:

“And whatever you do, do it heartily, as to the Lord and not to men, knowing that from the Lord you will receive the reward of the inheritance; for you serve the Lord Christ.”

This shows that when we go to work in the morning and do our best, remain honest, and take responsibility, we honor God.

God sees into our hearts. Psalm 101:6 says:

“My eyes shall be on the faithful of the land, That they may dwell with me; He who walks in a perfect way, He shall serve me.”

God is looking for faithful Christians; people He can rely on, who serve with dedication in small tasks.

An example of such a person is Hanani in Nehemiah 7:2: “[T]hat I gave the charge of Jerusalem to my brother Hanani, and Hananiah the leader of the citadel, for he was a faithful man and feared God more than many.”

That is why Nehemiah appointed him over Jerusalem; not because he was the most talented person, but because he was a faithful man.

Finally, the book of Revelation describes a great promise from God to faithful people. In Revelation 2:10, we read: “Do not fear any of those things which you are about to suffer. Indeed, the devil is about to throw some of you into prison, that you may be tested, and you will have tribulation ten days. Be faithful until death, and I will give you the crown of life.”

“Be faithful until death, and I will give you the crown of life.” What a promise! Faithfulness has eternal value. Those who remain faithful to God, even in difficult times, in trials, in seemingly unimportant situations, will ultimately be rewarded by God Himself.

All these Bible passages show that faithfulness in small things is not a side issue. It is crucial for our spiritual growth, for our witness, for our calling. God does not call us first to do great things, but He wants us to follow Him faithfully, day after day.

And it is there, in faithfulness to the little things, that the way opens up for what God has in store for us.

Faithfulness in small things is so important because it reveals our heart and character. Those who are faithful in small things—such as in their use of money, time, words, or a promise—prove that they are also ready for greater tasks.

Great deeds impress people. But faithfulness in small things impresses God.

Lead Writer: Christoph Sperzel (Germany)

Initial translation: Daniel Blasinger

Back to top

Preaching the Gospel and Feeding the Flock

compiled by Dave Harris

“Die Geschichte des Opfers” is the title of this Sabbath’s first German split sermon, presented by Michael Link. Title in English: “A Story of Sacrifice.”

“Könnte Ihre Unpünktlichkeit Sünde sein?” is the title of this Sabbath’s second German split sermon presented by Norbert Link. Title in English: “Could Your Unpunctuality Be Sinful?”

“Kontrollieren Sie Ihre Gedanken” last Sabbath’s German sermonette presented by Dmitrij Niemann, is now posted. Title in English: “Control Your Thoughts.”

“William Tyndale,” last Sabbath’s sermonette presented by Paul Niehoff, is now posted. Here is the summary:

God has raised up many people to do the work He required. One of them used to translate much of the Bible into English from the original languages was William Tyndale, a Catholic priest whose aim was to enable the common people to read God’s Word in their native language. Because of doing this, he was put to death.

“Beyond the Basics of Obedience,” last Sabbath’s sermon presented by Kalon Mitchell, is now posted. Here is the summary:

The 10 Commandments are the basics in the laws of God. They are the cornerstones for any true practicing Christian. Yet, Christ goes on to tell us that the 10 Commandments are not enough in terms of going above and beyond. What does that mean and what does that look like?

Back to top


How This Work is Financed

This Update is an official publication by the ministry of the Church of the Eternal God in the United States of America; the Church of God, a Christian Fellowship in Canada; and the Global Church of God in the United Kingdom.

Editorial Team: Norbert Link, Dave Harris, Rene Messier, Brian Gale, Johanna Link, Eric Rank, Michael Link, Anna Link, Kalon Mitchell, Manuela Mitchell, Dawn Thompson

Technical Team: Eric Rank, Shana Rank

Our activities and literature, including booklets, weekly updates, sermons on CD are provided free of charge. They are made possible by the tithes, offerings and contributions of Church members and others who have elected to support this Work.

While we do not solicit the general public for funds, contributions are gratefully welcomed and are tax-deductible in the U.S. and Canada.

Donations can be sent to the following addresses:

United States: Church of the Eternal God, P.O. Box 270519, San Diego, CA 92198

Canada: Church of God, ACF, Box 1480, Summerland, B.C. V0H 1Z0

United Kingdom: Global Church of God, PO Box 44, MABLETHORPE, LN12 9AN, United Kingdom

©2026 Church of the Eternal God
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.