This Week in the News

Jens Spahn Faces Criticism Over Ongoing Costs From Mask Purchases 

The Munich Eye wrote on July 7: 

“The ongoing financial implications of mask procurement during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic continue to draw scrutiny, particularly towards Jens Spahn, the former Health Minister of Germany. Despite the passage of time since the initial purchases, the federal government is still grappling with substantial follow-up costs associated with the acquisition of protective masks. According to a report by the Federal Court of Auditors submitted to the Bundestag’s Budget Committee, there remains a significant stockpile of 800 million masks as of 2024, for which no effective distribution strategy has been established. The expenses related to managing this excess procurement have surged by EUR57 million, totaling EUR517 million in 2024. Projections for the current year indicate an allocation of EUR45 million, with an anticipated total expenditure of EUR67.3 million for the years 2026 and 2027. This figure includes costs for storage, logistics, destruction of unused supplies, external consultancy, and legal advice. 

“Spahn is under increasing pressure due to the procurement strategies employed by the Health Ministry during his tenure. In 2020, the Ministry engaged directly in the procurement process, entering into fixed-price contracts without prior negotiations, which led to disputes with suppliers over unaccepted deliveries. The Federal Court of Auditors highlighted that the Ministry spent approximately EUR5.9 billion on 5.8 billion masks, yet only 1.7 billion were distributed domestically. Consequently, a significant portion of the procured masks had to be destroyed or remains pending destruction

“In response to the looming possibility of an inquiry, Spahn expressed a calm demeanor… He defended his actions during the pandemic, arguing that decisions made during that time should be contextualized within the crisis and criticized what he described as malicious allegations against him… However, subsequent investigations by several media outlets revealed that Spahn had played a crucial role in the mask procurement process, allegedly leading to inflated purchasing costs, favoring associates, and neglecting proper needs assessments. Spahn has denied all allegations of impropriety… 

“As discussions continue regarding the implications of the mask procurement strategy, further inquiries and testimonies are expected in the upcoming sessions of the Bundestag’s Budget and Health Committees.”

Germany’s Judicial Appointments Postponed 

Deutsche Welle reported on July 11: 

“The conservative CDU/CSU bloc has pushed for postponing the vote on one of the [three] judges… The union’s junior coalition partner, the Social Democrats, were outraged by the decision… The conservative bloc, made up of the CDU and the allied Bavarian… CSU, requested postponing the vote on the appointment of Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf following plagiarism allegations. Brosius-Gersdorf’s candidacy was put forth by the… SPD, the junior partner in the ruling coalition. 

“The conservatives had already expressed skepticism over her liberal stance on abortions and her support for mandatory vaccinations during the COVID-19 pandemic… A two-thirds majority is needed for judges to be elected to the high court. The far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party has said it would support [Federal Labour Court judge Günter] Spinner [who was proposed by the CDU], but not the SPD candidates. The conservative may be reliant on AfD votes to get its candidate through as it has so far rejected talks with the Left Party. However, votes are secret so it will not necessarily be clear if the AfD votes are what gets Spinner across the line.” 

But there is much more going on behind the scenes than meets the eye. Especially “power-hungry” Jens Spahn is again in the midst of controversy. 

Note the next article. 

This Disaster Has a Name: Jens Spahn 

Bild Online published the following commentary by lead author Peter Tiede on July 11: 

“A catastrophic day for our parliament!… The election of three lawyers to Germany’s highest court has become a scandal today. A monstrous embarrassment for parliament, the constitutional court, and the country. A brutal blow to this coalition. A subterranean dismantling of a lawyer. A unique event in the history of our parliament. And this scandal… bears two names: that of Chancellor Friedrich Merz and, above all, that of Jens Spahn, his CDU/CSU parliamentary group leader. 

“Because: Spahn should have fixed all this for Merz. Spahn should have recognized that his parliamentary group would NOT elect the SPD candidate for the highest court with a majority. Now, the scandal’s glaring traces are also sticking with Merz. Spahn should have protected Merz, his own parliamentary group, and, above all, his coalition partner from this damage. Spahn slept through this for weeks, or underestimated it, or let it run. 

“But almost worse than his failure at work… is his cowardice. Because what happened that Friday morning was cowardly: Spahn hid behind a flimsy, barely investigated accusation of plagiarism against the SPD’s candidate for judge. When it became clear that even individual discussions with MPs who did not want to vote for the SPD candidate were fruitless, when it became clear that many dissenters had NOT contacted HIM, Spahn hid behind the plagiarism hedge. And then the star witness, the plagiarism hunter, came along and said: He never mentioned plagiarism. And whoosh: the hedge was gone! Behind it was a caught Jens Spahn. And a duped chancellor. 

“For this coalition… the debacle is a catastrophe. Brutal for Merz: The SPD now has every reason for bloody revenge. It can now demand even higher prices for everything it doesn’t actually want, but which is agreed upon in the coalition agreement. From pensions to citizen’s income to investments – the SPD can demand, block, and pay back. Thanks to Spahn, it can lead Merz around the ring. There’s only one thing, according to SPD leadership, the SPD can no longer do: work with Jens Spahn in a spirit of trust. And so Friedrich Merz must ask himself whether he can and wants to continue to rely on Spahn, whether [Spahn] has the trust of his parliamentary group – and whether he, the Chancellor, can still expect the SPD to put up with this Jens Spahn. 

“Merz had also been warned from within his own ranks against appointing the power-hungry Spahn as parliamentary group leader. He did it anyway. Even though Spahn, as Minister of Health, is under massive pressure due to the procurement of masks during the coronavirus pandemic. Spahn has been in self-defense mode for weeks. And now it’s obvious that Merz was wrong, that Spahn can’t do both: take care of himself and the parliamentary group; cover both his own back AND the Chancellor’s. 

“Today’s election disaster is far worse than a million pointless or overpriced masks… The damage to Merz, the CDU/CSU, and Spahn is one thing. The damage to our country is something else entirely: Friedrich Merz and the CDU/CSU must ask themselves what and who they want to continue to subject us to. Because our country has never seen such a scandalous drama as today. This must not go without consequences…” 

t-online reported on July 13 that Merz clearly supported Spahn and described the process as “undramatic.” Due to tremendous pressure, Spahn has finally admitted that he has “some” culpability and liability for the disaster.   

And More and More Tariffs 

Thomson/Reuters wrote on July 11: 

“U.S. customs duty collections jumped again in June as President Donald Trump’s tariffs gained steam, topping $100 billion for the first time during a fiscal year and helping to produce a surprise $27 billion budget surplus for the month, the Treasury Department reported on Friday. The budget data showed that tariffs are starting to build into a significant revenue contributor for the federal government, with customs duties in June hitting new records… 

“Trump has long touted tariffs as a lucrative revenue source, saying on Tuesday that ‘the big money’ would start to flow in after he imposes higher ‘reciprocal’ tariffs on U.S. trading partners on Aug. 1. Trump disagrees with economists who consistently say those taxes are paid by U.S. consumers and importers… tariffs have now grown into the fourth-largest revenue source for the federal government… 

“… the president has put his tariff assault into overdrive, announcing 50% levies on copper imports and goods from Brazil and a 35% tariff on Canadian goods, all due to start on Aug. 1. The Trump administration is preparing more sector-based tariffs on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals.” 

Trade War Continues 

Deutsche Welle wrote on July 12: 

“The US is set to impose a 30% tariff on all goods from the European Union from August 1, 2025… The 27-member bloc and the US failed to reach an agreement to strike a comprehensive trade deal, including zero-for-zero tariffs on industrial goods…. The US president said the trade relationship with the EU has been ‘unfortunately, far from Reciprocal,’ as such ‘we will charge the European Union a Tariff of only 30%.’ Trump has frequently described tariffs as charges on other countries, but in reality, the charge is usually paid by the consumer within the US. Tariffs make imported goods more expensive and thus less competitive… 

“The German economy, the biggest in Europe, is heavily reliant on exports and thus particularly vulnerable to a trade war with the US. 

“European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the EU is prepared to take the necessary steps to safeguard its economic interests if the US proceeds with imposing a 30% tariff rate on EU exports…’ including the adoption of proportionate countermeasures if required.’” 

Trump also announced a 30% tariff against Mexico. The AP wrote: “With Saturday’s letters, Trump has now issued tariff conditions on 24 countries and the 27-member European Union.” 

Politico wrote on July 12: 

“GOP warning sign in new poll: Trump’s voters don’t love his tariffs About 1 in 4 self-identified 2024 Trump voters… said last month that the president’s tariffs are hurting the United States’ ability to negotiate better trade deals with other countries. They’re also evenly divided on whether Trump should have the ability to unilaterally impose tariffs on other countries in the first place, with 45 percent saying he should and 44 percent saying he should get approval from Congress 

“… while the tariffs he has raised on imports like steel, aluminum and auto parts, as well as a baseline 10 percent duty on all foreign goods, have brought in billions of dollars, they are paid for by the companies and individuals importing the goods — costs many companies pass onto their consumers.” 

Crazy! 

EU’s Proposed Retaliatory Tariffs 

Politico wrote on July 14:

“The European Union is looking at targeting €72 billion in U.S. goods in a second round of trade countermeasures, including aircraft, cars and car parts… 

“The bulk of those exports targeted are industrial goods, totaling €65.7 billion, while €6.4 billion in agricultural products would also be hit if EU countries back the new retaliatory tariffs. The list includes bourbon whiskey… The biggest line item in the 200-page list is aircraft and aircraft parts, with tariffs set to target almost €11 billion of U.S. exports — potentially dealing a heavy blow to plane maker Boeing… 

“Then comes machinery, followed by cars and car parts; chemicals and plastics; medical devices and equipment; electrical equipment; and industrial goods — all of which fall into multibillion-euro categories.” 

Chaotic Raid on California Cannabis Farm 

The New York Post wrote on July 11: 

“A migrant farm worker died after sustaining ‘catastrophic’ injuries from a 30-foot fall during Thursday’s chaotic immigration raid at a southern California marijuana farm… The worker… suffered a broken neck and skull, along with a severed artery, after immigration agents descended on Glass House Farms in Camarillo during a large-scale operation that erupted into a violent scene as authorities clashed with dozens of demonstrators… 

“Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said the worker wasn’t being pursued by federal authorities when he climbed onto the roof of a green house and fell… Several other farm workers were also critically injured during the raid, which resulted in the arrest of about 200 migrants suspected of being in the country illegallyUS citizens were also detained, with some still unaccounted for, farm union officials said. 

Ten migrant youths, most of them who crossed the border unaccompanied, were also found at the Ventura County pot farm… The facility is now under investigation for child labor violations… Glass House Farms has since denied claims that it violated hiring regulations or employed minors. The farm, which uses half of its space for cannabis while the other is dedicated to tomatoes and cucumbers, said it ‘fully complied with agent search warrants’ ahead of the immigration operation… Thursday’s raid is believed to be the largest carried out under the Trump administration…. 

“President Trump announced Friday that he’s granting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents ‘Total Authorization’ to arrest violent protestors following [the] chaotic California cannabis farm raid that resulted in rocks being hurled at federal law enforcement vehicles. The angry mob attempted to block a road between farm fields and several agitators appeared to be hurling rocks at the officers, who used canisters with an unknown substance and fired less-than-lethal rounds in an effort to get the crowd to retreat, according to ABC 7. 

“One man among the crowd of protesters appeared to fire a gun at advancing agents. The FBI is offering a reward up to $50,000 for information leading to the apparent shooter’s conviction.

Officers speeding away from the scene in SUVs and vans were also pelted with several large rocks… 

These violent confrontations will continue. They were so predictable. This won’t end well. 

Homan Admits: ICE Engaged in Racial Profiling 

Mediaite wrote on July 11: 

“President Donald Trump’s border czar, Tom Homan, sparked a wave of angry reactions on Friday after he told Fox News that border patrol doesn’t need probable cause to detain suspected illegal migrants… ‘[They just need] articulable facts based on the location, the occupation, their physical appearance, their actions…’” 

The Forgotten Victims 

MSN wrote on July 12: 

“Federal immigration agents raided a Home Depot in Barstow last month and arrested a man who had his 3-year-old pit bull, Chuco, with him. A friend managed to grab Chuco from the scene and bring him back to the garage where he lives. The dog’s owner was deported to Mexico the next day. Pets belonging to people who are deported or flee are being left in empty apartments, dumped into the laps of unprepared friends and dropped off at overcrowded shelters… Unless people do take the initiative [and get the pets out], those animals will starve to death in those backyards or those homes… Yet with many animal refuges operating at capacity, it can be difficult to find temporary homes… Pets are like the collateral damage to the current political climate… 

“Animals suffer from the emotional strain of separation and unceremonious change when their owners vanish, experts said. When a mother and three young daughters from Nicaragua who were pursuing asylum in the U.S. were unexpectedly deported in May following a routine hearing, they left behind their beloved senior dog. She was taken in by the mother’s stepmom. Not long after, the small dog had to be ushered into surgery to treat a life-threatening mass. The small dog is on the mend physically, but ‘is clearly depressed, barely functioning and missing her family,’ the stepmother wrote… She is used to spending all day with the girls and sleeping with them at night, the stepmom said. From Nicaragua, the girls have been asking to get their dog back. For now, they’re using FaceTime.” 

LA Judge Orders ICE to Stop 

NPR wrote on July 11: 

“A federal judge in Los Angeles [who is black and was appointed by Joe Biden] ordered the Trump administration to stop carrying out immigration sweeps in which she said federal agents have been indiscriminately arresting people across southern California without reasonable suspicion that they’re in the country illegally. Since early June, agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Border Patrol and other federal agencies have been roving Los Angeles and surrounding counties arresting thousands of people in what civil rights lawyers characterized in a lawsuit last week as an unconstitutional and ‘extraordinary campaign of targeting people based on nothing more than the color of their skin.’ 

“In her order, Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong, of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, said there is ‘a mountain of evidence’ to support the claim that agents are arresting people solely based on their race, accents, or the work they’re engaged in, in violation of the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable government seizure. ‘The seizures at issue occurred unlawfully,’ Frimpong wrote. 

“She issued two temporary restraining orders — one prohibiting immigration agents from arresting people without reasonable suspicion that they’re in the country illegally, and the other requiring agents to give people they arrest immediate access to lawyers. The orders, which apply to Los Angeles and six surrounding counties, are temporary while the case moves forward. But they could severely restrict the Trump administration’s ability to continue carrying out the raids that have sown fear and terror in immigrant and Latino neighborhoods since they started on June 6… 

“In a statement, Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin criticized the ruling. ‘A district judge is undermining the will of the American people,’ McLaughlin said. ‘America’s brave men and women are removing murderers, MS-13 gang members, pedophiles, rapists — truly the worst of the worst from Golden State communities. Law and order will prevail.’ 

“But the ruling is the latest potential roadblock for President Trump as he escalates his immigration crackdown by focusing on large, Democratic-run cities whose leaders he’s accused of trying to sabotage his efforts to carry out his mass deportation plans. 

“It came a little more than a week after Public Counsel, the American Civil Liberties Union and other groups filed an emergency class action lawsuit alleging that ICE and Border Patrol agents are engaged in widespread racial profiling, arresting people they encounter in public solely because they have brown skin or because they’re doing work often done by immigrants. Since early June, agents have repeatedly raided known hubs for Latino workers, including car washes, day laborer gathering spots, and street vendor corners. They’ve also pulled people who appear to be Latino out of their cars, and picked them up from bus stops and on sidewalks. They’ve arrested immigrants without legal status and U.S. citizens alike. Many of the arrests have been filmed by bystanders and posted to social media… 

“Judge Frimpong said during Thursday’s hearing that she was skeptical of the government’s general assurances that immigration agents are not arresting people arbitrarily… Whether immigration agents will scale back their aggressive tactics in response to the judge’s order is unclear…”

California’s Original King of Deportation 

The Los Angeles Times wrote on July 12: 

“He sent federal immigration agents into Southern California communities, farms and workplaces vowing to drive ‘illegal aliens’ back across the border. His raids regularly netted hundreds of arrests a day and he once boasted about apprehending 70,000 people in a single month in San Diego County alone. 

“When L.A. declared itself a ‘sanctuary city’ for Central American migrants, he vowed to have Washington cut off the city’s federal funding. He took pride in arresting undocumented workers when they showed up to collect their lottery winnings… Before Donald Trump and Stephen Miller and Kristi Noem, there was Harold Ezell

“Ezell… ran one of — if not the — biggest deportation operation in California history… using his troops to, as he put it, turn back the ‘invasion’ and return America to ‘Americans’… 

“Ezell himself admitted in 1986 that all the arrests were not keeping up with the estimated 2,000 new border crossings each day. He insisted it was about sending a message. That same year, Congress passed the landmark Immigration Reform and Control Act, which gave a path to citizenship to more than three million immigrants here illegally… 

“Ezell eventually became a major supporter of Proposition 187, the California measure that prohibited undocumented workers from receiving public assistance. The measure passed, but it began a political backlash to anti-immigration policies. Changing attitudes and demographics made California much more supportive of immigration as a benefit to the economy and the culture… Ezell died in 1998… the extremism of the 1980s and 1990s anti-immigration movement were also the seeds of its destruction… Stephen Miller should learn well from Ezell, but not in the way he would like to think… History has not been kind to Ezell… that’s how history is already remembering Miller…” 

“Support For Immigration Reaches Historic High in US Despite Trump Crusade” 

El País wrote on July 12: 

“Against the backdrop of an unprecedented crusade against migrants, the United States is experiencing a surprising turnaround in public perception on immigration, according to a recent Gallup poll. Despite the fact that this was one of the issues that marked the presidential election and delivered the presidency to Donald Trump just eight months ago, support for immigration in the country has now reached record highs, even among Republicans. About 8-in-10 Americans, 79%, say immigration is ‘a good thing’ for the country today, up sharply from 64% a year ago and a high point in a nearly 25-year trend. In contrast, only two in 10 U.S. adults say immigration is a bad thing, down from 32% last year. 

“The poll, conducted between the 2nd and 26th of June, shows that the change in perception is across the political spectrum. While Democrats remain the most positive on immigration, at 91%, there was also a significant increase among Independents and Republicans over the last year: from 64% to 79%, and from 39% to 64%, respectively…. 

“More specifically, when asked about their opinion of President Trump’s immigration policyonly 35% approve of his administration’s management on migration, while 62% disapprove. Among Hispanics, support drops to 21%, 14 points below the national average, reflecting their strong opposition to policies such as mass detentions and deportations. However, the partisan breakdown on this point is stark: 85% of Republicans approve of Trump’s work on immigration, compared to just 28% of independents and a minimal 2% of Democrats. In contrast, 81% of Democrats report ‘strong’ disapproval.” 

Hundreds at Alligator Alcatraz Without Criminal Charges 

The Miami Herald wrote on July 15: 

“Hundreds of immigrants with no criminal charges in the United States are being held at Alligator Alcatraz, a detention facility state and federal officials have characterized as a place where ‘vicious’ and ‘deranged psychopaths’ are sent before they get deported… Mixed among the detainees accused and convicted of crimes are more than 250 people who are listed as having only immigration violations but no criminal convictions or pending charges in the United States… 

“A third of the detainees have criminal convictions. Their charges range from attempted murder to illegal re-entry to traffic violations. Hundreds of others only have pending charges… The information… suggests that scores of migrants without criminal records have been targeted in the state and federal dragnet to catch and deport immigrants living illegally in Florida… 

“Nationally, nearly half of detainees in ICE custody as of late June were being held for immigration violations and did not have a criminal conviction or charge…” 

And so, we are consistently being lied to. Note the next article

Mistrust the Government

The Ron Paul Institute published the following article on July 14 which was written by Ron Paul in his weekly column:

“The willingness of so many Trump allies to openly criticize the Epstein announcement and other actions like the bombing of Iran is a positive development. Advancing liberty requires that more people refuse to automatically trust government officials, whether concerning Epstein, wars, the economy, or other important matters… 

“Those who understand the philosophy, history, and economics of liberty can explain that it is not just that some government officials lie. Instead, all governments lie, and the more important the issue the bigger the lie. In fact, the modern state is built on a series of lies…

“Exposing such lies is key for restoring liberty…” 

So true! That’s why converted Christians must not have anything to do with it. 

Mistrust the (Fake) Media

The Record wrote on July 14:

“A Kremlin-linked disinformation group has been impersonating real journalists and publishing fake articles on spoofed news websites to spread false narratives in France, Armenia, Germany, Moldova and Norway, researchers have found… Storm-1516 used the names and photos of legitimate reporters on bylines to lend credibility to false claims published on the fake news sites…

“A fake article targeting German Chancellor Friedrich Merz claimed that he had illegally killed a family of polar bears during a hunting trip in Canada. The story was unsigned but listed several staff members of the Toronto Star as authors, none of whom were involved…” 

Is Trump Falling Apart Over Epstein? 

Showbiz411 wrote on July 12:

“The presidency is falling apart [over] Pam Bondi’s announcement that no Epstein files exist. They existed a short time ago, of course, when binders were waved around reading ‘Epstein Files.’… We can imagine Trump is [in the files] since Epstein called him his best friend and there is plenty of video evidence of their hanging out together. 

“So what does Trump do? He announces this morning, apropos of nothing, that he might revoke Rosie O’Donnell’s citizenship. Rosie has been living in Ireland just to get away from the madness here. She’s very much a US citizen, born in New York to American parents. 

“Trump knows he can’t do this, but it’s a misdirection, a fake out to get the press off the Epstein story. He also announced 30% tariffs on the UK and EU today. He’s trying to get away from the court ruling last night stopping ICE from acting like the gestapo. Trump is losing bigly. Trump also lost his final appeal to not pay E. Jean Carroll $5 million in the sex abuse case.”

Trump Responds… But Fails 

NBC News wrote on July 13: 

“On the weekend President Donald Trump decided to pick his biggest political fight to date with the MAGA base he created in his own image, thousands of his adherents were gathered together… Trump pulled the rug out from his base Saturday evening when he released a lengthy social media post that completely dismissed the importance of the issue, which has consumed the right for the past week — and longer…

“Trump’s supporters have gone along with him through every scandal and policy shift. When he made a decision, his base backed him. But the Epstein issue is challenging this alliance like never before... There was no escaping the topic of the Epstein files this weekend in Tampa, with many attendees and speakers calling for Bondi to be fired — even as Trump sent the clear message that he wants his supporters to move on…

“Former Florida state Rep. Anthony Sabatini, who was among Trump’s biggest supporters when in the state Legislature and was in attendance at the event, called Trump’s Truth Social post ‘out of touch.’ 

“On the main stage at the Student Action Summit on Friday night, Megyn Kelly, a high-profile conservative commentator and Trump supporter, asked crowd a simple question: Bondi or Bongino? ‘Bongino!’ the crowd screamed in unison Friday night. ‘It’s 7,000 to 0,’ responded Charlie Kirk, prominent conservative activist and the head of Turning Points USA, who was the master of ceremonies for the weekend.” 

Trump’s Achilles Heel

The Hill added on July 13:

Elon Musk blasted President Trump on Saturday over his defense of Attorney General Pam Bondi… ‘Just release the files as promised,’ Musk added. Musk, a few minutes later, responded to a separate post calling the Epstein case Trump’s ‘Achilles’ heel,’ rebuking the president for pledging to release the files on the campaign trail and now dismissing the significance of the case. 

“‘This is a very big deal,’ Musk responded. ‘What… kind of system are we living in if thousands of kids were abused, the government has videos of the abusers and yet none of the abusers are even facing charges!?’… The president suggested some of his political opponents ‘created’ the Epstein files…” 

Trump’s opponents created files which don’t exist? Words fail… 

Epstein Scandal Will NOT Go Away! 

Fox News wrote on July 13: 

“Longtime conservatives and supporters of Trump sounded off on social media this weekend, as well as in person during a convention in Florida, with various messages pledging that the Epstein scandal will not ‘go away.’… 

“‘Donald Trump please understand the EPSTEIN AFFAIR is not going away,’ retired Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn, Trump’s national security advisor from his first administration, posted to X on Saturday. ‘If the administration doesn’t address the massive number of unanswered questions about Epstein, especially the ABUSE OF CHILDREN BY ELITES (it is very clear that abuse occurred), then moving forward on so many other monumental challenges our nation is facing becomes much harder.’…

“‘We cannot allow pedophiles to get away. I don’t personally care who they are or what elite or powerful position they hold. They must be exposed and held accountable!!!’ Flynn continued in his X post.” 

Lingering Doubts Regarding Epstein’s “Suicide” 

Breitbart wrote on July 12: 

“[A] Wired article said on Friday that the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released several hours of what it labeled ‘full raw’ video from a camera near the criminal’s cell the night before his demise. 

“Metadata embedded in the video and analyzed by WIRED and independent video forensics experts shows that rather than being a direct export from the prison’s surveillance system, the footage was modified, likely using the professional editing tool Adobe Premiere Pro. The file appears to have been assembled from at least two source clips, saved multiple times, exported, and then uploaded to the DOJ’s website, where it was presented as ‘raw’ footage. 

“Experts caution that it’s unclear what exactly was changed, and that the metadata does not prove deceptive manipulation. The video may have simply been processed for public release using available software, with no modifications beyond stitching together two clips. But the absence of a clear explanation for the processing of the file using professional editing software complicates the Justice Department’s narrative… 

“During a recent episode of The Drill Down podcast, hosts Peter Schweizer and Eric Eggers interviewed Epstein’s former attorney David Schoen… He continues to doubt that Epstein killed himself… based on the findings of Dr. Michael Baden, whom he called the best forensic pathologist in the world. He also said Epstein asked him to do work that would only have had an impact much later, suggesting he had no intention to kill himself…” 

Epstein Mysteries 

Daily Mail wrote on July 14: 

“Critics have pointed to the fact that there is a crucial minute missing from the jail house video that also does not show the door or, indeed, the inside of Epstein’s jail cell.” 

Only two cameras were operational in the vicinity of the Special Housing Unit at the time Epstein was found, and neither of them captured his cell door. Closer cameras, which might have captured the door, were reportedly malfunctioning at the time.  

Jeffrey Epstein’s cellmate was removed from his cell on the morning of August 9, 2019, as part of a routine, prearranged transfer. Despite a previous determination that Epstein needed to be housed with a cellmate, no replacement was assigned after this transfer. This left Epstein alone in his cell at the time of his death the next day. 

Coverup to Protect Prominent Pedophiles? 

Alter Net wrote on July 10:

Alan Dershowitz… alleged in a bombshell disclosure that key documents tied to convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein are being withheld — not to protect victims, but to shield powerful figures… Dershowitz continued: ‘I know who’s suppressing them, but I’m bound by confidentiality from a judge and cases, and I can’t disclose what I know… But… I know the names of people whose files are being suppressed in order to protect them, and that’s wrong…’ 

“Meanwhile, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) reacted to Dershowitz remarks Thursday and wrote on the social platform X: ‘RELEASE THE EPSTEIN CLIENT LIST!!!!’ Political analyst Dominic Tripi wrote: ‘The names, the concealed documents, who’s being protected, all of that is available. It’s a pure coverup, they think if you find out the truth it will thoroughly destroy the legitimacy of governing institutions.’” 

Some claim that Epstein might have worked for the Mossad (Israeli intelligence) which Israel has denied. 

Trump Supporters Unhappy With Trump

Mediaite wrote on July 16:

“President Donald Trump, in a stunning Truth Social post Wednesday, branded the Jeffrey Epstein story — which has been perpetrated by the highest ranking members of his Justice Department for years — a ‘hoax.’… The president made clear he no longer wants the support of those who remain interested in the Epstein investigation…

“The comments from Trump come amid a raft of public criticism from prominent MAGA influencers over his handling of Epstein, and even public polling showing broad dissatisfaction among his base.”

Deutsche Welle added on July 15:

“Trump repeated his claim [on Tuesday]  that the Epstein files were fabricated by the Democratic presidents before him, despite having previously said during his 2024 election campaign that he would ‘probably’ release them… Many of Trump’s supporters… are accusing the administration of shielding powerful figures allegedly tied to the case…

“…far-right figures… and even his daughter-in-law, Lara Trump… have demanded more transparency. Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson also broke with Trump, calling for full disclosure of any Epstein-related files, saying, ‘We should put everything out there and let the people decide.’ Several other Republicans have echoed the same view… ‘For this to go away, you’re going to lose 10% of the MAGA movement,’ said Steve Bannon, Trump’s former chief strategist, amid the growing political fallout…”

Other prominent Republicans demanding the release of all the Epstein files include former Vice President Mike Pence, Senator John Kennedy, and Senator Ted Cruz.

AFP wrote on July 16:

“US President Donald Trump blasted ‘foolish’ [and ‘stupid’] Republican supporters Wednesday as he went on the attack against anyone questioning his administration’s handling of the case of dead sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein… “Trump is facing the most serious split in his loyal right-wing base since he returned to power…”

Trump needs to be careful that he does not lose more and more supporters. Attacking them like that is not the way to do it.

Most Americans Disagree With Trump

The New York Post wrote on July 16:

“As much as President Trump and the White House would like everyone to shut up and move on from the dead pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, a new poll shows that the scandal isn’t going away.

Rasmussen polling this week shows Trump has suffered a sharp drop in approval over the period of the Epstein brouhaha, plummeting from a plus-4 popularity rating to a negative-4 in three weeks.

“The poll of 1,164 likely voters conducted on July 8-10 found that just 21% believe the Trump FBI and DOJ are telling the truth about Epstein, who was found hanged in his jail cell in 2019.

While FBI Director Kash Patel and deputy Dan Bongino insist that Epstein committed suicide, only 31% of voters believe them.

“Roughly two-thirds of every political category — 68% of Democrats, 66% of Republicans and 69% of unaffiliated voters — reject the idea that the Epstein case is closed and instead believe that there are dozens of powerful and wealthy offenders who need to face justice.”

Three Minutes Missing

 WIRED wrote on July 16:

“Newly uncovered metadata reveals that nearly three minutes of footage were cut from what the US Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation described as ‘full raw’ surveillance video from the only functioning camera near Jeffrey Epstein’s prison cell the night before he was found dead…

“The metadata confirms that the first video file, which showed footage from August 9, 2019, continued for several minutes beyond what appears in the final version of the video and was trimmed to the 11:58:58 pm mark, right before the jump to midnight.”

Judge Blocks Trump Order on Birthright Citizenship 

Newsweek wrote on July 11: 

“The legal fight over President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship could soon return to the U.S. Supreme Court.  A judge in New Hampshire on Thursday blocked Trump’s order ending birthright citizenship for children born to those without legal status from taking effect anywhere in the U.S. Judge Joseph LaPlante, who was appointed by Republican President George W. Bush, issued a preliminary injunction and certified a class-action lawsuit that includes all children who will be affected. 

“The judge’s decision comes just weeks after the Supreme Court limited judges’ authority to issue nationwide injunctions… without settling the underlying question of the constitutionality of Trump’s order. 

“The court didn’t rule out whether judges could accomplish much the same thing by a different legal means, a class action. Birthright citizenship, enshrined in the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, makes anyone born in the U.S. an American citizen, including children born to mothers in the country illegally. 

LaPlante wrote in his order…: ‘Respondents’ arguments about irreparable harm remain unconvincing to the court, which has no difficulty concluding that the rapid adoption by executive order, without legislation and the attending national debate, of a new government policy of highly questionable constitutionality that would deny citizenship to many thousands of individuals previously granted citizenship under an indisputably longstanding policy, constitutes irreparable harm, and that all class representatives could suffer irreparable harm absent an injunction…’ 

“LaPlante’s order included a seven-day stay to allow for appeal.” 

Judges Stand Up to Trump 

The Editorial Board of the New York Times wrote on July 12: 

“Many Americans in positions of power, including corporate executives and members of Congress, seem too afraid of President Trump to stand up to his anti-democratic behavior. Federal judges have shown themselves to be exceptions. ‘Judges from across the ideological spectrum are ruling against administration policies at remarkable rates,’ said Adam Bonica, a political scientist at Stanford University. 

“These rulings have halted Mr. Trump’s vengeful attempts to destroy law firms, forestalled some of his budget cuts and kept him from deporting additional immigrants. Yes, the Supreme Court has often been more deferential to the president. Still, it has let stand many lower-court rulings and has itself constrained Mr. Trump in some cases… 

“Courts have blocked some policies, including the deportation of additional detainees to a Salvadoran prison. Other policies remain in effect, including the confinement of immigrants previously deported to El Salvador. Many cases are still being heard.”

We are setting forth below findings by some of the judges appointed by Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush, and Donald Trump: 

“J. Harvie Wilkinson III, Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Appointed by Ronald Reagan 

“On the refusal to return Kilmar Abrego Garcia from El Salvador: ‘This is a path of perfect lawlessness, one that courts cannot condone.’… 

“Patrick J. Schiltz, District of Minnesota. Appointed by George W. Bush 

“On the revocation of a student’s visa: ‘The court cannot imagine how the public interest might be served by permitting federal officials to flaunt the very laws that they have sworn to enforce.’ 

“Clay D. Land, Middle District of Georgia. Appointed by George W. Bush 

On an attempt to designate someone as an ‘alien enemy’ without due process: ‘Allowing constitutional rights to be dependent upon the grace of the executive branch would be a dereliction of duty by this third and independent branch of government and would be against the public interest.’ 

“Roger L. Gregory, Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Appointed by George W. Bush 

“On a claim that Venezuela has invaded the U.S.: ‘As is becoming far too common, we are confronted again with the efforts of the executive branch to set aside the rule of law in pursuit of its goals.’ 

“Stephanie A. Gallagher, District of Maryland. Appointed by Donald Trump 

“On the deportation of an asylum seeker to El Salvador: ‘Defendants have provided no evidence, or even any specific allegations, as to how Cristian, or any other class member, poses a threat to public safety. … This is a court of evidence.’ 

“Richard J. Leon, District of Columbia District. Appointed by George W. Bush 

“On an executive order targeting the law firm WilmerHale: ‘There is no doubt this retaliatory action chills speech and legal advocacy, or that it qualifies as a constitutional harm.’ 

“John D. Bates, District of Columbia District. Appointed by George W. Bush 

“On an executive order targeting Jenner & Block: ‘In short, the order raises constitutional eyebrows many times over. It punishes and seeks to silence speech ‘at the very center of the First Amendment.’ 

“Trevor N. McFadden, District of Columbia District. Appointed by Donald Trump 

“On The Associated Press’s access to the White House being restricted for not using ‘Gulf of America’: ‘Indeed, the government has been brazen.’ 

“John C. Coughenour, Western District of Washington. Appointed by Ronald Reagan 

“On the order denying birthright citizenship: ‘I’ve been on the bench for over four decades. I can’t remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one. This is a blatantly unconstitutional order.’ 

“Joseph N. Laplante, District of New Hampshire. Appointed by George W. Bush 

“On the order denying birthright citizenship: ‘The executive order contradicts the text of the 14th Amendment and the century-old untouched precedent that interprets it.’ 

“Royce C. Lamberth, District of Columbia District. Appointed by Ronald Reagan 

“On a funding cut for the agency overseeing Voice of America: ‘It is hard to fathom a more straightforward display of arbitrary and capricious actions than the defendants’ actions here.’ 

“Mary S. McElroy, District of Rhode Island. Appointed by Donald Trump 

On a claim that an agency was not responsible for a funding freeze it had announced: ‘In short, the government asks the court “to overlook the simplest, most logical explanation” for what happened. The court declines.’ 

“William G. Young, District of Massachusetts. Appointed by Ronald Reagan 

“On a cut in funding for research into health disparities: ‘I have never seen government racial discrimination like this.’ 

There have of course been many more judges, appointed by Democratic presidents, taking issue with Trump’s actions. 

The article continues: 

“The judiciary’s willingness to confront Mr. Trump over the past six months has been vital. In other democracies that have slid toward autocracy, the complicity of judges has frequently been a key reason. For now, many American judges are standing firm. They have done so even as Mr. Trump and his allies have personally threatened judges and made many feel unsafe. It remains unclear what will happen next. 

“One scenario is optimistic — namely, that judges on lower courts will continue to constrain Mr. Trump, the Supreme Court will ultimately uphold most of these rulings and the administration will largely obey them… Other scenarios are more disturbing: that the Supreme Court becomes even more deferential to him, or that the administration flouts court rulings more blatantly than it already has. Either way, federal judges have made clear that they consider Mr. Trump’s conduct to be more worrisome than the conduct of any other modern president.” 

The Houthis as Powerful as Ever 

The Telegraph wrote on July 10: 

“A little over two months ago, Donald Trump was emphatic in claiming to have halted Houthi militants’ attacks on shipping in the Red Sea… Despite Mr Trump’s confidence, this week the Houthis have sunk two vessels in quick succession on the critical shipping route and shattered months of relative calm off Yemen’s coast… The Houthi resurgence has taken some nations by surprise, especially after its biggest backer – Iran – was hit first by Israel and then by US B2 bombers. 

“But through careful alliance building, ruthless extortion rackets and more independence, the group is more powerful than it has been in years. This week’s attacks, which the Houthis said were conducted in solidarity with the Palestinians, not only show the hollowness of Mr Trump’s supposed ceasefire, but also the resilience of the militant group and the limits of air strikes… 

“Mr Trump’s declaration of victory in May was murky from the start… While Mr Trump had publicly said the Houthis had agreed to stop attacks, the group itself had continued to say it would attack vessels linked to Israel and its allies. Any deal between the two was in fact probably only restricted to US vessels… 

“A two-year campaign of strikes conducted under Joe Biden and then Mr Trump is estimated to have cost at least $7 billion… Last year, United Nations experts said the Houthis were allegedly collecting as much as $180 million each month from shipping agencies to allow vessels to sail through the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden without being attacked. While the report was questioned by maritime safety experts, such income would be one of the Houthis’ main revenue streams….” 

Iran Wants Trump Assassinated 

Newsmax wrote on July 11: 

“Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi, Iran’s top Shiite cleric, and Grand Ayatollah Hossein Noori Hamedani issued fatwas against Trump after the U.S. bombings of Iranian nuclear facilities last month, citing alleged threats against Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and that anyone who works with the U.S. and Israel is an ‘enemy of Allah.’ Shirazi proclaimed that any ‘Muslims of the world’ who successfully assassinate Trump or Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will be deemed ‘warriors of Allah’ and ‘receive blessings.’ 

“The fatwas prompted the creation of an organization called the ‘Blood Covenant,’ which claims to have raised nearly $40.3 million for Trump’s assassination… Iranian religious figures at the Howza-e Ilmiyya seminary in Qom offered support for the fatwas on Trump, saying July 2 that the president’s ‘blood is permitted’…” 

More Weapons for Ukraine 

Deutsche Welle wrote on July 14: 

“President Donald Trump said the US will send Patriot air defense systems to Ukraine and that they will be paid for by the European Union. During his announcement, Trump expressed his frustration in dealing with Russian President Vladimir Putin… Trump has threatened to impose secondary tariffs of 100% on Russia and countries that trade with it (unless a deal to end the war with Ukraine is reached within 50 days)— in an attempt to bring the war in Ukraine to an end… 

“Berlin has already provided Kyiv with three of the 12 Patriot systems it previously possessed. ‘We only have six left in Germany,’ [German defense minister Boris] Pistorius said. [He] added that at least one Patriot unit was always unavailable due to maintenance or training, and that two others had been lent to Poland. ‘We definitely can’t give any more,’ Pistorius said. Pistorius also stated that Germany would not deliver its long-range Taurus missiles to Ukraine despite Kyiv’s renewed request.” 

The Associated Press wrote on July 14: 

“Trump said European allies would buy ‘billions and billions’ of dollars of U.S. military equipment to be transferred to Ukraine…  Germany has offered to finance two Patriot systems…” 

CNN added on July 14 

“Trump spoke last week to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who said on the call he was looking for the US to deliver the systems to Germany so they could be transferred to Ukraine.” 

EU Not Entirely Happy with USA Over Ukraine

 Deutsche Welle wrote on July 15:

“‘The 50 days that Mr. Trump has announced is rather long,’ Dutch foreign minister Caspar Veldkamp said… The [European Union’s foreign affairs chief Kaja] Kallas told reporters after Tuesday’s meeting that she would like to see Europe and the US ‘share the burden’ of arming Ukraine… Denmark’s Rasmussen made a similarly veiled allusion…

“While the US ranks as Ukraine’s single largest donor since its full-scale invasion by Russia, the European Union as a whole has spent roughly the same amount as Washington over the same period… The EU outspends the US when the cost of hosting and assisting Ukrainian refugees is factored in.”

“US Navy’s Next-Generation Submarine Program Faces Alarming Delay” 

Fox News wrote on July 14: 

“The Navy’s next-generation attack submarine won’t be a reality for at least 15 years, according to a new report. The Navy’s SSN(X) was originally slated to enter production in 2031. That timeline has since slipped – to 2035 and now to 2040, due to escalating costs and budget constraints. 

“The Navy requested $623 million in its FY 2026 budget to advance the program… 

“Despite nearly doubling its shipbuilding budget over the past two decades, the Navy has consistently fallen short of its ship-count goals. The Government Accountability Office noted that Navy shipbuilding programs and yards are effectively operating in a ‘perpetual state of triage.’”

More Than Half of Canadians See U.S. as a Top Threat 

National Post wrote on July 8: 

“As U.S. President Donald Trump pursues his global trade war and talk of annexation, a new poll suggests the percentage of Canadians who view the United States as a top threat has tripled since 2019. 

“While this year’s survey by the Pew Research Center suggests that 55 per cent of Canadians still say the U.S. remains this country’s most important ally, it also says that 59 per cent now see the U.S. as a threat — up from 20 per cent in the 2019 poll… In Canada, roughly three-quarters of respondents said the U.S. poses an economic threat and 53 per cent said it poses a national security threat.” 

Israel-Syrian War Continues

Axios wrote on July 16:

“The Trump administration has asked Israel to halt its strikes on Syrian government targets and to open direct talks with Damascus, a senior U.S. official told Axios on Wednesday… U.S. officials are highly concerned that the Israeli attacks — including on Syrian military headquarters in Damascus and near the presidential palace — could destabilize the new Syrian government.” 

The Jerusalem Post added on July 16:

“As of Wednesday afternoon, the IDF had undertaken 160 aerial attacks on Syrian regime forces in and around the vicinity of Sweida in southern Syria, where Israel says the regime’s forces are slaughtering Syrian Druze.

“In addition, the IDF has attacked, and possibly destroyed, Syria’s Defense Ministry, and also attacked part of the Presidential Palace in Damascus. Dozens or more Syrian regime forces are said to have been killed in IDF attacks.”

Daily Mail wrote on July 9: 

“Spain’s hard-right Vox party has doubled down on a vow to deport illegal immigrants by declaring it would also remove foreigners who ‘have not adopted our customs’. .. 

“’We don’t know how many there are,’ he added. ‘But when we reach the government, we will. And they will all go.’ The fiery rhetoric comes as Vox enjoys a significant boost in the polls after Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez’s  Socialist Party (POSE) slipped in the wake of a corruption scandal… Sanchez, who leads a minority coalition government comprising far-left party Sumar, has thus far resisted mounting calls from the opposition to resign and call a snap election… 

“The main opposition People’s Party was well ahead on 33.3% support, while Vox – the third-largest party in Spain’s parliament – climbed 1.3 percentage points to 15.2%… The People’s Party has previously rejected proposed deportation plans put forward by Vox.”

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News 

ICE’s Illegal Arrests Continue 

NPR wrote on July 4: 

“Immigrant advocates and civil rights lawyers say evidence is mounting that immigration agents carrying out the Trump administration’s deportation crackdown in southern California are engaging in widespread racial profiling. They’ve raided known hubs for Latino workers almost daily – hardware store parking lots, car washes, and street vendor corners. Videos of many of those operations, filmed by bystanders and posted to social media, have shown agents arresting people who appear to be Latino as they stand on sidewalks or wait at bus stops

“On Wednesday, the American Civil Liberties Union and other legal groups filed a federal class action lawsuit alleging that immigration agents roving the streets are targeting people based on the color of their skin or their apparent occupation. They want a judge to declare the raids unconstitutional. ‘There is a real sense that it is open season on anyone who appears to be an immigrant,’ said Eva Bitran, director of immigrants’ rights at the ACLU of Southern California. ‘They are arriving, corralling people before asking one single question, just based on their location and their appearance. Often they are handcuffing people even before they have asked for their papers, or even after a person has said “I am a US citizen, I have a green card, I have every right to be here”…’ 

“Advocates say the Trump administration’s ambitious daily arrest quotas are leading immigration agents to lean on the thinnest of justifications and on false assumptions about people they encounter to justify arrests. ‘If you’re asking these law enforcement agencies to arrest 3,000 people a day, they cannot form reasonable suspicion for each specific person,’ Bitran said…” 

And if that was not enough already… note the next articles. 

Even Much More Power For ICE 

Salon wrote on July 3:

“Trump’s budget… allocated some $175 billion towards his mass deportation campaign, more money than almost any country spends on its military… According to estimates from the World Food Programme, the funds going towards deportation would… be enough to fully fund the program to end world hunger for four years… 

“Americans have already had a preview of some of what’s to come with the increased deportation budget, like on Wednesday, when Trump traveled to Florida to tour a new camp being built there to house immigrants… The facility is expected to cost around $450 million a year, just a fraction of the $45 billion that Republicans have allocated towards building new detention facilities…. Trump also suggested that the new camp could be the first of many, foreshadowing a new incarceration system in the United States.”

Rather than fighting worldwide hunger, America is fighting unliked “illegal” aliens… 

7,000 a Day! 

The New York Post wrote on July 7: 

“President Trump’s ‘border czar’ Tom Homan wants ICE agents to arrest at least 7,000 illegal immigrants every day — more than double the current quota — after the agency received a giant budget boost for its mass deportation campaign with the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill. 

“‘And for those that say 3,000 a day is too much, I want to remind them, do the math, we have to arrest 7,000 every single day for the remainder of this administration just to catch the ones Biden released into the nation,’ Homan told reporters Monday outside the White House. Trump signed the nearly 900-page bill into law on July 4, opening the door for ICE to hire 10,000 new officers and double its capacity to detain illegal immigrants… 

“White House adviser Stephen Miller recently pushed ICE to make 3,000 arrests per day… The Trump administration originally gave ICE a quota of 1,800 arrests a day in January and increased the expectations in May.” 

Horrific! 

Charging “Remittance Tax”? 

Breitbart wrote on July 3: 

“Acting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Director Todd Lyons is praising final passage of President Donald Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill, mainly for its ‘unprecedented funding’ toward federal immigration enforcement… 

“The bill includes more than $46 billion for new border wall construction, $45 billion for ICE detention space, nearly $30 billion for ICE to go on a hiring spree and deport more illegal aliens, $10 billion to reimburse states who covered border security costs under former President Joe Biden, and $3.5 billion for the Department of Justice to issue grants to local governments who help locate and arrest illegal aliens, among other funding measures. Perhaps most significantly, the bill establishes a historic remittance tax to effectively fine illegal aliens who earn money in the U.S. and send that money back to their home countries.” 

A remittance tax refers to a tax on money transfers sent from the United States to recipients in foreign countries. It is primarily aimed at international cash transfers, particularly those sent by non-US citizens or nationals. The tax would typically be imposed on the sender of the remittance and collected by the entity facilitating the transfer (e.g., banks or money transfer operators). Imagine someone in the US wants to send money to their family abroad. A remittance tax would be an extra fee levied on that transfer, making the overall cost of sending the money higher. This is so abominable! But the next article describes even more abominable developments.

A Terrible Shift to Right Extremism 

Axios wrote on July 5: 

“Once-fringe tactics — an alligator-moated detention camp, deportations to war zones, denaturalization of immigrant citizens — are now being proudly embraced at the highest levels of the U.S. government. It’s an extraordinary shift from Trump’s first term, when nationwide backlash and the appearance of cruelty forced the administration to abandon its family separation policy for unauthorized immigrants. Six months into his second term… Trump is only just beginning to scale up his mass deportation machine… 

“Pro-Trump activist Laura Loomer drew outrage after tweeting that ‘alligators are guaranteed at least 65 million meals if we get started now’ — widely interpreted as a reference to the Hispanic population of the United States… 

“Some newer members of the MAGA coalition, such as podcaster Joe Rogan, have expressed deep discomfort with the targeting of non-criminal undocumented immigrants…. some MAGA influencers are pushing to weaponize denaturalization more broadly — not just as a legal remedy for fraud, but as a tool to punish ideological opponents… Prominent voices on the right have argued that immigrants who haven’t properly ‘assimilated’ — by their definition — should be vulnerable to losing their citizenship.” 

The hatred by political extremists is frightening. 

Federal Immigration Agents Descend on MacArthur Park in Los Angeles 

ABC Eyewitness News wrote on July 7: 

“Federal agents and National Guard troops descended on MacArthur Park while children were at a summer camp on Monday, sparking chaos and fear in the area. The neighborhood is home to a large immigrant population; however, agents appeared to have left largely empty-handed. 

“The raid began unfolding just before 11:30 a.m. AIR7 video shows what appears to be federal agents holding weapons and standing on an armored vehicle. The agents were not wearing any identification as they rolled through the park… Many large National Guard vehicles were also spotted in the area. Defense officials told ABC News that 90 armed troops were involved in the operation in support of immigration authorities in Los Angeles. All of the troops involved in the operation were activated members of the California National Guard. The operation included some 17 Humvees, four military cargo trucks and two military ambulances [with the agents seen carrying rifles and traveling across the grounds on foot, horseback and in armored vehicles.] 

“‘They brought terror to the community, but they didn’t have the guts to stick around because they knew if they stuck around here, to really do a big raid, the community would come out to defend the people,’ said Ron Gochez with Unión Del Barrio. ‘And that’s exactly why we’re here. They have all the courage when it’s a senior citizen vendor selling flowers by a cemetery. They had the courage to go kidnap her. But when the masses come out, where is the courage?’… 

“L.A. Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez said a summer camp was taking place at MacArthur Park when federal agents and troops moved in. She said the kids were quickly ushered into the lower level of the building used for the camp to keep them away from the immigration raid.” 

Just a Political Stunt? 

The Guardian wrote on July 7: 

“MacArthur Park has long been an immigrant neighborhood, with a history of political activism. In 2007, it was the center of the May Day rallies demanding amnesty for undocumented people, which were met with exceptional brutality by the Los Angeles police department… 

“‘This morning looked like a staging for a TikTok video,’ said Marqueece Harris-Dawson, president of the Los Angeles city council, adding if the border patrol wants to film in LA, ‘you should apply for a film permit like everybody else. And stop trying to… disrupt our economy every day.’”

The New York Post added on July 8:

“One Border Patrol official promised that federal agencies aren’t backing down… ‘The federal government is not leaving LA. … The federal government does not work for Karen Bass. We’re going to be here until that mission is accomplished,’ [he said]. ‘Better get used to us now because this is going to be normal very soon,’ he added.” 

Or a Botched Laughingstock? 

Ken Klippenstein wrote on July 7: 

“The news media is describing the operation as an ominous crackdown, but National Guard sources tell me that it was a botched laughingstock. The military aspect of the operation, codenamed Operation Excalibur, has not been previously reported. 

“The documents reveal that the erstwhile justification for the operation was to try to shut down the distribution of fake IDs. The mission of the 1st Squadron, 18th Cavalry is described as protecting DHS [Department of Homeland Security] ‘security points and blocking positions’ while they undertook their assault. The operation was meticulously planned, the threat listed as ‘HIGH.’ ‘Criminal elements, likely including FTO [foreign terrorist organization] MS-13 consider the park their home “turf” and could escalate to lethal violence,’ a threat assessment warned. 

“Then all that planning went bust. Because ICE and CBP apparently failed to communicate or coordinate effectively, the military showed up too late (and Los Angeles authorities weren’t notified until two hours prior.)… 

“This is just the latest operation that didn’t go off as planned, amplifying the sense amongst the California Guardsmen that the whole spectacle is idiotic and shameful. Part of the reason for the confusion is the sheer number of government agencies involved… 

“One Army source told me that it all felt like some joint military operation overseas, where soldiers need to identify themselves as ‘friendlies’ on congested battlefields. Treating Los Angeles as a foreign country with insurgents to be defeated, military and homeland security intelligence views MacArthur Park as a viper’s nest of illegality… Many of the soldiers involved, I’m told, view their mission as unnecessary and even ridiculous, with the Trump administration ordering the spectacle and the Pentagon leadership and chain of command smartly saluting. .. 

“Similarly last month, when leadership discussed during a briefing the idea of having Guardsmen wear masks similar to ICE and CBP, rank-and-file members groaned at the stupidity and bad optics for the uniformed military. The Guard, they said, should be seen as members of the community, not shadowy interlopers… 

“Mayor Karen Bass, as if an interloper in her own city, rushed to MacArthur park in her own SUV motorcade and asked the feds to leave. Bass told the Los Angeles Times that the feds needed ‘to leave and they need to leave right now, they need to leave because this is unacceptable.’ The uniformed military I’ve spoken to seem to agree with her

“While military leadership is embracing the Washington-inspired mission, sources say, the rank-and-file see the California operation as more akin to Afghanistan: doomed to failure and ultimately withdrawal.” 

Whatever the purpose of the raid was, the optics were horrible, reminding us of actions by the Gestapo during the Third Reich or of NVA soldiers [“National People’s Army” or “Nationale Volksarmee”) in former East Germany; or Russian invasions of former East Block countries, such as the Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968. 

No Amnesty for Farm Workers 

Newsmax wrote on July 8: 

“Illegal migrants who work on U.S. farms will not be given amnesty and could be subjected to mass deportation efforts as the Trump administration strives for ‘a 100% American workforce,’ Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins said Tuesday. Rollins, though, did say the administration needs to be ‘strategic in how we are implementing the mass deportation so as not to compromise our food supply.’

“President Donald Trump last week in Iowa said he’s willing to let migrant laborers stay in the U.S. if the farmers they work for will vouch for them…”

What Rollins is saying now is not what Trump had originally announced. 

Trump’s New Tariff Chaos

The Daily Mail wrote on July 7: 

“President Donald Trump hammered Japan and South Korea for running up a trade imbalance with the U.S., declaring both countries will be slapped with a new 25 percent tariff starting August 1. Trump issued a scathing attack in two letters he sent the leaders of both countries, declaring ‘our relationship has been, unfortunately, far from reciprocal.’ Then he brought down the hammer, declaring what the new tariff would be, which could cripple the economies of two allies of the U.S…. 

Markets immediately dropped on the news, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average shedding 400 points, and the broader S&P 500 losing nearly a percentage point in value. Trump concluded with another threat: ‘If for any reason you decide to raise your tariffs, then, whatever then number you choose to raise them by, will be added onto the 25% that we charge,’ he wrote… 

“The U.S. helped rebuild both economies after World War II and after the Korean War through extensive trade ties. For years U.S. consumers and companies have turned to both countries for automobiles and consumer products as well computer chips and technology vital to an array of other products… Japan already faced a 25 percent tariff on cars, auto parts, and steel, in addition to facing the 10 percent across the board tariff… 

“Following the briefing, Trump posted letters to a tranche of other countries: Malaysia, South Africa, Myanmar (formerly Burma), Kazakhstan, Vientiane, and others. The letter to South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, who clashed with Trump during an Oval Office meeting, included a 30 percent tariff.  

“Global markets are bracing for more tariff chaos as the White House plans to release a dozen or more letters signed by President Trump telling countries what taxes must be paid when they send goods to the United States.  The talk of the letters has now overtaken much of the conversation about ‘deals,’ with Trump’s team telling various nations in writing how much must be paid. The result could hike the costs that American pay for a variety of goods… 

“Trump has secured preliminary trade agreements with the United Kingdom, China, and Vietnam, though all three deals still require further negotiation to finalize terms. … In just one of the trade matters that is up in the air, Trump reportedly threatened the European Union with a 17 percent tariff on food exports, a move that could hammer that industry. Without a deal the EU faces a 50 percent tax on all goods going into the United States. EU officials told the Financial Times the new food tax is an escalation between the two trading partners….” 

Even though Trump had proclaimed that due to his tariff threats, countries would line up to make deals with the USA, this has simply not been the case. 

No Farmland for Chinese (and Others) 

The Washington Post wrote on July 8: 

“U.S. Department of Agriculture chief Brooke Rollins announced Tuesday that the U.S. government will move to ban sales of farmland nationwide to buyers tied to China and other foreign adversaries, citing threats to national security and food security — an effort that casts uncertainty over property currently held by China-linked investors. 

“Asked whether the U.S. government would seek to take back existing land owned by Chinese investors, Rollins said they are looking at ‘every available option’ as part of a clawback effort and that an executive order from the White House will probably follow ‘very soon.’… Rollins said that the USDA will also work with state legislators to quickly push through laws that will ban further purchases, with a particular focus on parcels of land near U.S. military bases… 

“The percentage of total U.S. farmland owned by Chinese investors amounts to just 0.0003 percent and has declined sharply in recent years…” 

Musk’s New Party 

Breitbart wrote on July 6: 

“Entrepreneur and former Department of Government Efficiency Director Elon Musk on Saturday announced the creation of the America Party. Musk says the American Party will restore democracy and freedom after suggesting he would start a new political party amid a high-profile feud with President Donald Trump. 

“He conducted a straw poll on his social media platform X on Friday, Politico reported. ‘By a factor or 2 to 1, you want a new political party, and you shall have it,’ Musk said Saturday afternoon in a post on X. ‘When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,’ Musk continued. ‘Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.’ 

“Musk suggested the political party would focus on two or three Senate seats and between eight and 10 House seats during the 2026 mid-term elections, CNBC reported. Given the narrow margins among House and Senate majorities in recent years, a small number of seats in both chambers would be enough to significantly influence legislation, Musk said. He said the party would caucus independently of Democrats and Republicans but enter into legislative discussions with both.” 

Deutsche Welle added on July 6: 

“He revived the idea of a new political party this week as US lawmakers approved Trump’s sweeping tax and spending bill. Musk was among the legislation’s most vocal critics and has pledged to establish a new party to oppose Republicans who supported the bill… 

“A truly competitive third party could disrupt over a century of Democratic and Republican dominance at all levels of government. But Musk would not be the first person trying to establish a party to challenge their dominance. 

Former President Theodore Roosevelt came the closest in 1912, after splitting from the Republican party. He ran as Progressive Party candidate and won 27% of the popular vote and 88 electoral votes. More recently, Ross Perot, another billionaire, won 19% of the popular vote but no electoral votes in the 1992 presidential campaign as an independent and later formed the Reform Party.” 

The Associated Press reported on July 7: 

“Asked about the effort by reporters on Sunday afternoon as he prepared to return to Washington from his home in New Jersey, Trump called Musk’s proposition ‘ridiculous,’ going on to tout ‘tremendous success with the Republican Party.’ ‘The Democrats have lost their way, but it’s always been a two-party system,’ Trump added. ‘And I think starting a third party just adds to confusion. It really seems to have been developed for two parties.’ Third parties, Trump said, have never worked.” 

Trump also told his followers: “I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely ‘off the rails,’ essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks.” 

According to Focus, dated July 7, “Original America didn’t care much for political parties. They aren’t mentioned at all in the Constitution. George Washington, the first president of the United States from 1789 to 1797, belonged to no party.” 

There might have been much wisdom of the founding fathers in not speaking about the “necessity” of parties. Party affiliation far too often clouds the conscience of party members. The potential influence of Musk and his new party on the midterm elections should not be underestimated. Musk has no ambitions to become president… he could not anyhow, because he was not born in the USA, but in South Africa. But then, based on all the available evidence, it is not certain that Obama was born in the USA either. 

The Epstein File—The Final Straw? 

The Daily Mail wrote on July 7: 

“Outrage ensued following a stunning report claimed the Justice Department and FBI are concluding that disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein did not hold a ‘client list’ and did kill himself in prison. Among the top critics is billionaire Elon Musk who said the memo published by Axios on Sunday night is the ‘final straw.’… 

“Trump’s base is demanding answers and accusing Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel of ‘lying’ to the American public. Most of the online ire has been directed towards Bondi. ‘If Jeffrey Epstein had no client list, didn’t have elites raping girls on his island and hadn’t taken part in any blackmail schemes… Then… Why’d he kill himself?’ Pro-Trump content creator Robby Starbuck posted to X. He insisted: ‘Doesn’t pass the smell test Pam Bondi.’ 

“Right-wing media site the Gateway Pundit posted: ‘If Jeffrey Epstein Had No Client List Then Why Did AG Pam Bondi Tell Reporters the List ‘Is Sitting on My Desk Right Now to Review.‘… ‘Pam Bondi said the Epstein client list was on her desk to review for release to the public just a few months ago,’ Starbuck posted. ‘Now the DOJ she leads claims that there’s no Epstein client list.’ ‘Sorry but this is unacceptable,’ he insisted. ‘Was she lying then or is she lying now? We deserve answers.’” 

People added on July 7: 

“The Tesla CEO and former Trump ally [Musk] posted a meme on X, the social media platform he owns, depicting a man applying clown makeup next to text including, ‘There is no Epstein list.’” 

Vanity Fair wrote on July 7: 

“Elon Musk… also shared a post that read: ‘If the entire government is protecting pedophiles, it has officially become the government against the people. I hope you all understand that.’” 

The inconsistent and contradictory representations of the Trump administration on the Epstein matter are indeed cause for suspicion. 

The Epstein File—Tucker Carlson on the Attack 

The Daily Mail wrote on July 8: 

“A growing number of right-wing voices are calling for the resignation of Attorney General Pam Bondi after it was revealed no more arrests will be made in connection to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes… 

“On his podcast Tuesday, conservative luminary Tucker Carlson theorized that Bondi is orchestrating a cover-up in order to protect members of the intelligence community who were ensnared in Epstein’s conduct. ‘The current DOJ under Pam Bondi is covering up crimes, very serious crimes by their own description,’ Carlson said. ‘Intel services are at the very center of this story, U.S. and Israeli and they’re being protected.’” 

Mediaite added on July 8: 

“Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson warned that President Donald Trump and his administration could be inviting a ‘revolution’ by not delivering on his campaign promise to reveal the truth about Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal sex enterprise…. 

“‘But how can you say that thousands of children were raped, but I’m not going to find out who raped them!? How can you say that!? They said that! By the way, when Pam Bondi went on television and said, “I have a videotape of kids getting abused,” I didn’t, I followed this case closely and I know a lot of the people involved, as I’ve told you, I had no idea. I didn’t know that. Really? Thousands of children got raped? Who raped them? Where are the rapists? Like, why aren’t they in jail? This is the Department of Justice.  That is so crazy. This is like-, this is honestly one of the craziest things I’ve ever seen in my entire life. And I just think it’s very dangerous to play around with this stuff. Like, very dangerous. I don’t want a revolution, but if you wanted a revolution this is how you would act.’” 

JD Vance Under Attack Too 

Irish Star wrote on July 8: 

“A post JD Vance made about the ‘most powerful people’ being connected to Jeffrey Epstein has reemerged as the DOJ says a ‘client list’ doesn’t exist, despite Pam Bondi claiming she had it on her desk. JD Vance has been brutally roasted over a social media post he made about… Epstein as MAGA rages at the Trump administration for breaking a key election promise… MAGA’s Epstein frustrations escalated on Monday when a memo sent by the DOJ and FBI said that no ‘further disclosure’ of Epstein’s files or materials would be appropriate or warranted… 

“Referring to Epstein, the future Vice President wrote: ‘Remember when we learned that our wealthiest and most powerful people were connected to a guy who ran a literal child sex trafficking ring? And then that guy died mysteriously in a jail? And now we just don’t talk about it.’ Both critics of the vice president and MAGA supporters have recently been responding to the post, pointing out Vance’s hypocrisy… ‘There goes your chance as president,’ one noted. A second wrote: ‘You’re losing credibility so quickly, you had an opportunity to do better and you guys are failing…’ Another noted: ‘The silence is deafening Mr Vance.’… 

“During their public feud after the tech billionaires departure from the White House, Musk wrote in a now-deleted X post: ‘Time to drop the really big bomb… Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.’ He followed up shortly after: ‘Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.’ Trump has denied being on the list and Musk eventually said he’d taken things ‘too far.’” 

What list? We were just told that there is no list after Bondi said earlier that the list was on her desk. 

Does the Big Beautiful Bill Eliminate Tax on Social Security? 

The New York Times wrote on July 6: 

“In a celebratory email sent to Americans across the country, the Social Security Administration praised the Trump administration’s sprawling budget and tax bill and said it eliminated federal income taxes on most retirees’ benefits. But that’s not exactly what it does… 

“… the enhanced deduction will help reduce households’ tax bills on their overall income, including Social Security income. ‘The S.S.A. statement implies there is a direct tax cut on Social Security benefits,’ said Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center, a nonpartisan think tank, ‘which there is not.’ 

“Instead, older single filers will get the extra $6,000 deduction ($12,000 for couples), as long as their income falls under a certain ceiling (below $75,000 for single filers or $150,000 for married joint filers). Above those income levels, the deduction begins to decrease, and it goes away once single taxpayers’ income reaches $175,000 ($250,000 for couples). Nor will the extra deduction benefit all Social Security recipients. Retirees who are 62 through 64 are ineligible. 

“And since the income of more than half of Social Security recipients is too low to be taxed anyway, lower income people won’t be helped much. The new break is expected to benefit middle- and upper-middle-class households, tax policy experts said. (Recipients who earn less than $63,300 owe an average of 1 percent of their Social Security benefits in taxes)… 

“‘It is discouraging to see such misrepresentation by the administration and the Social Security Administration,’ said Martha Shedden, president of the National Association of Registered Social Security Analysts, a group that offers guidance to consumers and financial professionals on making Social Security decisions… 

“The email also says that ‘nearly 90 percent of beneficiaries will no longer pay federal taxes on their benefits.’ That, too, is misleading because the deduction is temporary, only in effect for tax years 2025 through 2028. The Social Security Administration did not immediately respond to a request seeking comment.” 

The American Prospect wrote on July 7: 

“If you listen to Donald Trump’s speeches…,  you hear a lot about certain modest elements of this bill: no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax on Social Security. That last one is not in the bill at all—there’s a temporary increase in the standard deduction for people over the age of 65 that is not tied to Social Security at all…” 

Churches Can Endorse Political Candidates? 

CNBC wrote on July 8: 

“The IRS said in a new federal court filing that churches can endorse political candidates to their congregations without risking the loss of their tax-exempt status. The move upends a 70-year-old interpretation of the U.S. tax code, whose Johnson Amendment has barred certain nonprofit groups, including churches, from endorsing political candidates without putting their tax-exempt status in jeopardy. President Donald Trump has long called for Johnson Amendment to be repealed. 

“‘Communications from a house of worship to its congregation in connection with religious services through its usual channels of communication on matters of faith do not run afoul of the Johnson Amendment as properly interpreted,’ the IRS said in the joint filing Monday.” 

Churches should stay out of the political arena by taking sides and endorsing political candidates. 

AI Used to Mimic Rubio’s Voice 

The Daily Mail wrote on July 8: 

“An imposter used AI technology to impersonate Secretary of State Marco Rubio and contacted at least a handful of top U.S. and foreign government officials, according to a diplomatic cable warning of the stunning blunder… 

“The imposter used text messages and the encrypted Signal app, the same app that led to the ouster of former National Security Advisor Michael Waltz after he accidentally added a reporter to a Signal group chat where top officials discussed a bombing campaign.” 

Southeast Asia Turns to Russia 

Deutsche Welle wrote on July 3: 

Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto skipped a G7 summit last month to visit Russia, where he and his counterpart, Vladimir Putin, agreed that bilateral ties are ‘getting stronger again.’… Prabowo’s trip came a month after Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s latest visit to Russia, his third in two years… Kuala Lumpur and Jakarta are exploring possible ways to expand trade, including in arms imports… 

“Several Southeast Asian states have an interest in exporting electrical goods and machinery to Russia… Last month, Vietnam and Moscow agreed to fast-track agreements that could see Russian firms help build Vietnam’s first nuclear power plants… many have looked to the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) grouping as an alternative arena for global politics. Indonesia is now a formal member of BRICS while Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam are partner countries… 

“Although Malaysia and Indonesia’s governments began their overtures with Russia before Donald Trump’s return to the White House in January, Washington turning away from international institutions since then has convinced many Asian leaders that they can no longer count on US support and that the future of the Western-backed international order might soon be over, analysts say…” 

The Far Eastern nations of the Kings of the East are forming. Iran should not be overlooked in that regard. Note the next article. 

Iran at BRICS Summit 

The New York Times wrote on July 5: 

“Battered by 12 days of war, Iran stands mostly alone and weakened in the Middle East. Yet the Islamic republic has found friends elsewhere in the world. Starting Sunday in Rio de Janeiro, Iran will join a two-day meeting of the BRICS group that includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa and other countries… 

“After Israel and the United States launched military strikes on Iran last month, the BRICS group issued a statement expressing ‘grave concern’ and calling the attacks a breach of international law and the United Nations Charter. Still the alliance, whose members represent more than half of the world’s population, stopped short of outright criticizing Israel or the United States…” 

Trump Threatens BRICS 

The New York Post wrote on July 7: 

“President Trump threatened to impose an additional 10% tariff on any country that aligns itself with what he described as the ‘Anti-American politics of BRICS,’ intensifying global trade tensions as the bloc of developing nations holds its summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. ‘Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy,’ Trump wrote Sunday evening… 

“Trump did not elaborate on which specific politics of BRICS… he considered anti-American. The bloc, formed in 2009, later added South Africa and last year included Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates as members. 

“In December, Trump threatened 100% tariffs on BRICS if member nations decided to issue their own currency — a move aimed at potentially undermining the US dollar. His comment Sunday came shortly after BRICS leaders issued a joint statement appearing to criticize Trump’s protectionist trade policies.” 

As the Tide Turns 

Daily Mail wrote on July 4: 

“Donald Trump yesterday agreed to help Ukraine boost its aerial defences after Russia launched its biggest assault of the war. The US President made the pledge after a ‘very disappointing’ phone call with Vladimir Putin on Thursday night (with the Russian leader refusing to agree to a ceasefire), with Russia launching the barrage hours after. Mr Trump spoke to Volodymyr Zelensky yesterday and seemingly vowed to ‘strengthen the protection’ of Ukraine’s skies. They also discussed joint industrial projects. 

“The two leaders, who have previously traded insults and fell out spectacularly at the White House earlier this year, spoke at length hours after Putin fired a record 539 drones and 11 missiles at Ukraine. The bombardment left at least one dead and 23 injured in Kyiv… 

“It follows reports that the US is to reduce the amount of military hardware it gives Ukraine, with US defence officials yesterday denying rumours [stemming directly from Trump himself] of a weapons shortage. Defence secretary Pete Hegseth was also said to have halted weapons shipments to Ukraine without consulting other US government departments.” 

Trump had said: “Biden emptied out our whole country giving them weapons, and we have to make sure that we have enough for ourselves” (Compare The Sun, dated July 4). 

Mark Rutte Warns of Simultaneous Russian and Chinese Invasions 

The Daily Mail wrote on July 6: 

“NATO chief Mark Rutte has chillingly warned that World War III will start with simultaneous invasions from Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin… Rutte suggested the combined attacks from the Chinese and Russian leaders could trigger a World War nightmare and bring the planet to the brink of Armageddon. 

“According to the NATO chief, China would start by seeking to grab Taiwan – while ensuring the Kremlin dictator simultaneously attacks NATO territory, amid fears Putin is anyway eyeing the Baltic republics Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, formerly part of the USSR. 

“Senior Putin security official Dmitry Medvedev – a former Russian president and ex-premier – lashed out on X: ‘Rutte has clearly gorged on too many of the magic mushrooms beloved by the Dutch. He sees collusion between China & Russia over Taiwan, and then a Russian attack on Europe. But he’s right about one thing: he should learn Russian. It might come in handy in a Siberian camp.’” 

This is not how World War III will start. The leaders and politicians of this world, not understanding biblical prophecy, look at all the wrong places, but overlook the coming real powerful and destructive enemy of the USA and the UK. 

What or Who Is Shylock? 

JTA wrote on July 4: 

“After facing criticism, President Donald Trump said he was unaware that the term ‘Shylock’ was widely considered antisemitic when he used it to describe unscrupulous bankers during a rally Thursday in Iowa… Shylock is the name of the Jewish money lender in William Shakespeare’s ‘The Merchant of Venice,’ a character that has come to be seen as an archetype of the stereotype that Jews are greedy and money-grubbing…

Joe Biden, then vice president, decried ‘Shylocks’ in 2014 to describe unscrupulous lenders who he said preyed on U.S. military personnel…” 

Antisemitism is difficult to root out, and it is sometimes even inadvertently unrecognized. 

German Persecution 

The European Conservative wrote on June 25: 

“On Wednesday, June 25th, the German federal police carried out a major operation throughout the country, searching the homes and confiscating the electronics of 170 people over social media comments that either fall in the general ‘hate speech’ category or just insult sitting politicians.  

“While individuals can be targeted by the authorities at any time, these coordinated country-wide raids are organized once every year since the 2017 adoption of Article 188 of the Criminal Code, which makes insulting politicians punishable to the same degree as online hate speech—with up to three years in prison—while defamation and slander can get you locked up for up to five years. 

“These so-called ‘action days’ are also supported by several ‘hate crime’ reporting centers throughout the country, often run by left-wing NGOs who file the charges on behalf of offended people and politicians. Thanks to these organizations, the number of registered online hate crimes reached a record level of over ten thousand last year, meaning the number has quadrupled since 2021. According to officials from the ruling center-right CDU, all this is perfectly normal in a democracy…. 

“In many cases, the ‘crimes’ involved merely entail legitimate criticism of government policies—saying Berlin fails to control migration could be considered Islamophobia or racism, for example—or just the opinions of everyday people of their elected officials. The most prominent abuser of the law is former vice-chancellor and Green party leader Robert Habeck, who personally reported over 800 citizens for insulting him online. Recently, a 64-year-old pensioner was convicted for calling Habeck ‘a complete idiot’ following a similar house search, while another man was fined €6,000 for calling him ‘dirty’ and former Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock ‘stupid.’ 

“And while Chancellor Merz’s CDU was trying to capitalize on the Greens’ abuse of Article 188 during the election campaign, they’ve been weaponizing it just as easily when it suited them. Merz himself has personally filed charges in several cases, which resulted in home searches. These include the case against a 50-year old nurse who called him an ‘asshole’ and who had to pay a €1,000 fine; a Stuttgart resident who called him a ‘dirty drunk’; and a wheelchair-bound woman who called him a ‘Nazi.’ 

And while the courts later dismissed all of these cases and ruled that the searches and confiscation of electronics were unlawful, none of them were compensated either for the damages or the criminal fines they were forced to pay.” 

“Pistorius Outlines Plans for Military Draft” 

Deutsche Welle wrote on July 8:

“A bill to be put forward by Defense Minister Boris Pistorius would allow the Cabinet, with parliamentary agreement, to call up conscripts if a situation arises that requires a rapid boost to the country’s armed forces, media have reported.  

“The bill is being seen as a compromise between some conservatives’ calls for the return of compulsory military service, which was suspended in Germany in 2011, and the opposition of many leftist lawmakers to such a move.”

The push for compulsory military service will continue. 

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News

Controversial US Supreme Court Decision on Birthright Citizenship 

The New York Times wrote on June 27: 

“The Supreme Court on Friday limited the ability of federal judges to temporarily pause President Trump’s executive orders, a major victory for the administration. But the justices made no ruling on the constitutionality of his move to end birthright citizenship, and they stopped his order from taking effect for 30 days

“The 6-3 decision, written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett and split along ideological lines, may dramatically reshape how citizenship is granted in the United States, even temporarily. The ruling means that the practice of giving citizenship automatically to the U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants and some temporary residents and visitors would end in the 28 states that have not challenged the order. 

“The Supreme Court on Friday allowed President Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship to take effect in some parts of the country for now, ruling that several district court judges had exceeded their authority in blocking the policy across the country. 

“The court stressed that its ruling did not address the constitutionality of Mr. Trump’s order itself, which bars government agencies from automatically treating babies as citizens if they were born on domestic soil to undocumented migrants or foreign visitors without green cards.” 

But this ruling, even though limited to the issue of whether federal judges can issue nationwide injunctions, still causes confusion and disharmony. And WHY should there be a decision along ideological lines—assuming the law is clear? Note the next article. 

A Chaotic Patchwork 

The Guardian wrote on June 27 and 28: 

“The ruling curtails nationwide injunctions against Trump’s order ending birthright citizenship – meaning that while lawsuits against the order proceed, the court has unleashed a chaotic patchwork of rights enforceability. The Trump administration’s ban on birthright citizenship will now be able to go into effect in jurisdictions where there is no ongoing lawsuit, or where judges have not issued regional stays. And so the supreme court creates, for the foreseeable future, a jurisprudence of citizenship in which babies born in some parts of the country will be presumptive citizens, while those born elsewhere will not. 

“More broadly the decision means that going forward, the enforceable rights and entitlements of Americans will now be dependent on the state they reside in and the status of ongoing litigation in that district at any given time… 

“In this decision, the court did not, technically, reach the merits of Trump’s absurd and insulting claim that the constitution somehow does not create a birthright entitlement to citizenship. But in the meantime, many children – the American-born infants of immigrant parents – will be denied the right that the 14th amendment plainly guarantees them…” 

Maybe not. Note the next article. 

Class Action Lawsuits as an Alternative? 

NPR wrote on June 27: 

“After the Supreme Court issued [its] ruling…, immigrant rights groups are trying a new tactic by filing a national class action lawsuit… The strategic shift required three court filings: one to add class allegations to the initial complaint; a second to move for class certification; and a third asking a district court in Maryland to issue… a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction asking for relief for that putative class… 

“In the amended complaint, filed two hours after the Supreme Court’s ruling, the immigrant rights attorneys said that Trump’s effort to ban birthright citizenship, if allowed to stand, ‘would throw into doubt the citizenship status of thousands of children across the country’… 

“The concept of birthright citizenship has deep roots, dating to the English common law notion of jus soli (‘right of the soil’)… Current legal standing for birthright citizenship in the U.S. extends back to the 1860s, when the 14th Amendment of the Constitution was ratified, stating, ‘All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.’” 

However, according to the New York Times, dated June 28, in concurring opinions, two key members of the conservative bloc, Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr., warned lower-court judges “not to lower standards for using alternative means to issue sweeping orders in an effort to circumvent the ruling. Justice Alito wrote that ‘district courts should not view today’s decision as an invitation to certify nationwide classes without scrupulous adherence to the rigors’ of legal rules. Justice Thomas added that if judges do not ‘carefully heed this court’s guidance’ and act within limits, ‘this court will continue to be “duty bound” to intervene.’” 

Trump Emboldened 

The Washington Post wrote on June 28: 

“An emboldened Trump administration plans to aggressively challenge blocks on the president’s top priorities, from immigration to education, following a major Supreme Court ruling that limits the power of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions. 

“Government attorneys will press judges to pare back the dozens of sweeping rulings thwarting the president’s agenda ‘as soon as possible,’ said a White House official…” 

Strong Attacks by Elon Musk on “Big Beautiful” Bill 

The Daily Mail wrote on July 1: 

“Donald Trump has threatened to turn the Department of Government Efficiency on… Elon Musk. The president suggested he may use the department Musk once headed to strip away the billionaire’s government subsidies to decimate his business empire, as their feud hit galactic new heights. 

“Trump issued the threat in response to Musk’s public protest over the ‘One Big, Beautiful Bill,’ in which he pledged to launch his own political party if the bill succeeds…. He then turned the screws on Musk, suggesting his time benefitting from the U.S. government could be over and that the South African native could be forced to return to his homeland… 

“The world’s richest man has argued that the legislation would greatly increase the national debt and erase the savings he says he has achieved through DOGE. His criticism of the bill has caused a rift with Trump, marking a dramatic shift after the tech billionaire spent nearly $300 million on the president’s re-election campaign… 

“After weeks of relative silence following a feud with Trump over the bill, Musk rejoined the debate on Saturday… calling it ‘utterly insane and destructive’ in a post on social media platform X.

On Monday, he ramped up his criticism, saying lawmakers who had campaigned on cutting spending but backed the bill, ‘should hang their heads in shame!’ ‘And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth,’ Musk said. 

“The Tesla and SpaceX CEO called again for a new political party, saying the bill’s massive spending indicated, ‘that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!’ ‘Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people,‘ he wrote.” 

Mediaite added on July 1: 

“Trump indicated Tuesday morning that he is open to deporting Elon Musk — amid his renewed battle with the Tesla boss. Speaking with reporters ahead of a flight to Florida on Tuesday, the president was asked about whether he would consider deporting the South African mogul. ‘We’ll have to take a look,’ Trump said.” 

Deporting Elon Musk? When will this silly nonsense ever end? Subsequently, the House adopted the bill. It will be interesting to see what Musk will do next.

Completely Obliterated or Not? 

The Daily Mail wrote on June 28: 

“New satellite photos have revealed that Iran is trying to piece together its nuclear site after the US sensationally bombed it last week. Heavy machinery was seen at the Fordow site as it appeared Iran has intensified its construction and excavation of the nuclear site after US B-2 bombers struck it last Saturday in Operation Midnight Hammer… 

“Construction equipment was also seen digging new access roads to the facility and repairing damage to the main one in order to restore access to the country’s main nuclear facility. US President Donald Trump said the strikes ‘completely obliterated’ Iran’s nuclear program and set it back years, but the new aerial images suggest the Middle Eastern country had taken preliminary effort to protect its facility. Iranian media said the sites had been evacuated prior to the strikes and the enriched uranium was transported to a ‘safe location.’  It is unclear how much uranium was left at the site during the bomb, but officials said there is no contamination after the strikes. Earthwork also showed signs tunnel entrances might have been sealed off before the attacks, Newsweek reported.  

“Similar construction activity was seen at the Fordow site prior to the strikes, where Iranians were seen shipping contents from the nuclear site to another location a half a mile away. Despite the extent of the damage being up to question, International Atomic Energy Agency – the UN’s nuclear watchdog – said Fordow’s centrifuges were ‘no longer operational’ and suffered ‘enormous damage.’… Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth… slammed the media for diminishing the strikes, which Trump compared to Hiroshima… Trump has threatened to sue The New York Times and CNN for reporting on the preliminary report [from the DIA suggesting ‘there was “low confidence” that that Middle Eastern country’s program had been set back.’]” 

Trump demanded an apology and retraction from the Times and CNN. Both responded by rejecting those demands. 

Only a Moderate Success 

The Tagesspiegel wrote on June 28: 

“He survived. Physically and politically. That was not a foregone conclusion. Ali Khamenei’s time and that of his regime could have ended. The twelve days of war against Israel and the USA posed an existential threat to Iran’s revolutionary leader… But shortly after the ceasefire was announced, the Ayatollah emerged from his bunker and, in his first public appearance in a long time, declared that the Islamic Republic had ‘crushed’ the ‘Zionists’ in battle. That is propaganda nonsense, no question. Which should also be clear to the cleric… 

“Against this background, the claim that the governments in Washington and Jerusalem have ‘achieved nothing’ initially seems like a blatant case of a loss of touch with reality. The only problem is: Khamenei’s assessment is at least partially correct‘Achieving less than the enemy secretly hoped’ would probably be a more appropriate formulation. Given its ambitious goals, the ‘Rising Lion’ offensive was not a resounding success for either the US or Israel. 

“These twelve days of missile and drone battles cost hundreds of lives and caused significant material damage. But that likely did too little to permanently halt Iran’s imperial ambitions in the Middle East and thus bring some peace to the Middle East. 

“… Khamenei and his followers may be weakened and humiliated for the time being, but they are by no means defeated. Even the assessment of the main reason for the war is sobering. Iran’s nuclear program has probably been set back by months, perhaps even years. However, it is doubtful that it has been completely neutralized… Rather, expert reports sound plausible, according to which the mullahs have had around 400 kilograms of highly enriched uranium secured—along with centrifuges, an important prerequisite for building a nuclear weapon. 

“The bomb in particular. Those in power will now leave no stone unturned to acquire it. Perhaps they will enter into negotiations to buy time. But that will not change their ambitions. Because the attacks on the Islamic Republic have shown them starkly: Our enemies only dared to rise up against us because we did not yet possess the ultimate weapon. 

“Iran will try to follow North Korea’s example. As a nuclear power, the Asian country is considered unassailable. The temptation to use this approach to intimidate the enemy is simply too great. Fear is also a core component of the mullah regime. The ruling clique continues to wield all the means of power. It uses them to suppress any form of opposition with force.” 

Trump’s Dilemma 

Focus wrote on June 29: 

“Trump is staging the US attack on Iranian nuclear facilities as a major victory – and reacting angrily to any form of doubt. But why is it so crucial for Trump that the world believes him?… 

“As CNN analyzes, Trump’s entire presidency is built on the image of a strong, courageous, virtually infallible leader. Doubts about the effectiveness of the attack would contradict this self-image. Any dissenting assessment – no matter how well-founded – would come across as an embarrassment and undermine Trump’s personal credibility… 

“The second reason, according to CNN, is strategic: If Iran indeed continues to be able to quickly restart its nuclear program, the US would theoretically have to intervene militarily again. This would present Trump with a dangerous dilemma – because such a ‘quasi-war’ with Iran for years contradicts his stated goal of not conducting any new foreign operations.” 

Trump Would Strike Again 

Deutsche Welle wrote on June 27: 

“US President Donald Trump said he would ‘absolutely’ order a strike on Iran if intelligence indicated that Tehran was still capable of enriching uranium to nuclear weapons-grade… 

“Regarding future inspections of Iran’s nuclear sites, the US president said he supports inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) or another respected source being able to inspect nuclear sites in Iran following the bombings by Israel and the US. 

‘Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that Tehran may reject any request by the IAEA, the UN’s nuclear watchdog, to visit the country’s nuclear sites, calling the insistence by IAEA head Rafael Grossi to visit nuclear sites in Iran ‘meaningless, even malign in intent.’ This comes after the Iranian parliament voted to suspend any cooperation with the IAEA over its failure to condemn the strikes carried out on various nuclear sites in Iran by Israel and the US.” 

So, is another never-ending war on the horizon? 

Has Trump Really Won? 

The Ron Paul Institute wrote on July 1: 

“Sunday’s attack on the three nuclear sites indeed was loudly proclaimed by Trump and Hegseth as such – having ‘obliterated’ Iran’s nuclear enrichment programme, they claimed. ‘Destroyed it completely,’ they insist.  Only … it didn’t: The strike caused superficial surface damage, perhaps. And seemingly was co-ordinated in advance with Iran via intermediaries to be a ‘once and done’ affair. This is a habitual Trump pattern (advance coordination). It was the mode in Syria, Yemen and even with Trump’s assassination of Qasem Soleimani – all intended to give Trump a quick media ‘victory.’.. 

“Iran likely has enough centrifuges and 450 kg of highly enriched uranium – and nobody (except Iran) now knows where the stash is hidden. Iran will resume processing…. ‘Iranian unconditional surrender’ is, of course, now off the cards… Put plainly: the US long war likely will be resumed in a new format… 

“Moving to the wider geo-political cost-benefit level, Israel’s standing (at the regional level) of being unassailable when fused to American power, has taken a blow…” 

Trump Angry With Iran’s Leader 

Newsmax wrote on June 27: 

“President Donald Trump on Friday said he immediately stopped pursuing sanctions relief for Iran following Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s statement of ‘anger, hatred, and disgust.’ A day earlier, Khamenei said his country had delivered a ‘slap to America’s face’ by striking a U.S. air base in Qatar and warned against further attacks in his first public comments since a ceasefire agreement with Israel… ‘Why would the so-called “Supreme Leader,” Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, of the war torn Country of Iran, say so blatantly and foolishly that he won the War with Israel, when he knows his statement is a lie, it is not so,’ Trump posted Friday afternoon on Truth Social. ‘As a man of great faith, he is not supposed to lie.’ 

“Trump wrote that not only was Iran ‘decimated’ by the Israeli and U.S. attacks, he prevented Israel from killing Khamenei. ‘I knew EXACTLY where he was sheltered, and would not let Israel… terminate his life,’ Trump wrote…” 

First Trump was angry with Israel. Now he is angry with Iran. 

Sleeper Cells in Waiting 

NewsNation wrote on June 27: 

“… the threat of [Iranian] sleeper cells has ‘has never been higher,’ according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection… Commissioner Rodney Scott said, ‘Thousands of Iranian nationals have been documented entering the United States illegally and countless more were likely in the known and unknown got-a-ways 

“Sleeper cells are spies or terrorists who operate in rival countries and remain inactive until they are essentially ordered to act… A recent Homeland Security threat assessment confirms that Iran remains a primary state sponsor of terrorism and continues efforts to target both current and former U.S. officials. That assessment echoes similar warnings issued by the Biden administration in 2024… Recruitment is typically done through networks, religious institutions or online platforms like social media. Recruiters typically appeal to emotions, such as alienation, injustice or religious duty… 

“Identifying sleeper cells is extremely difficult… some individuals may be homegrown or enter the U.S. undetected. [They lead] seemingly normal lives… and don’t draw any attention to themselves until it’s too late.” 

Preparing For the Third Temple 

Israel 365 News wrote on June 30: 

“In a remarkable development that highlights the complex relationship between religious belief and political ideology within Orthodox Judaism, the Toldos Aharon chassidic movement has established a specialized study program for Jewish priests (kohanim) to prepare for Temple service, despite the group’s well-known anti-Zionist stance… This ideological position makes their recent initiative all the more striking… [Toldos Aharon declared that] ‘We clearly see that we’re at the time of Ikvesa d’Meshicha (the final stage of redemption) and the third Beis Hamikdash (Temple) will be built soon in our days…’ 

“This initiative presents a fascinating paradox within Orthodox Jewish thought. While Toldos Aharon categorically rejects Zionism and the current State of Israel, they are actively preparing for the rebuilding of the Temple in Jerusalem—the very city that serves as Israel’s capital… 

“Modern science has provided remarkable validation for the preservation of the priestly lineage. Over 98% of Jewish men who identify as kohanim share a specific genetic marker,  providing scientific evidence for the integrity of the patrilineal priestly heritage that has been maintained over nearly 2,000 years since the destruction of the Second Temple. This genetic continuity, combined with the careful preservation of priestly genealogies within Jewish communities, has led to speculation that modern kohanim could indeed serve in a rebuilt Temple, despite the nearly two-millennium gap in practical Temple service.” 

NATO’s Embarrassing Performance 

The Guardian wrote on June 27: 

“Diplomats may remember it as the week in which the art of obsequiousness reached new highs and the sycophants plunged [to] new lows… The tone of [Nato’s secretary general Mark] Rutte’s public bootlicking had been muted compared with the text messages he had sent to ‘dear Donald’ before the summit – ‘Congratulations and thank you for your decisive action in Iran, it was truly extraordinary … you will achieve something NO president in decades could get done’… 

“What is more cringeworthy, after all – the clips of Trump’s cabinet members taking turns to parrot praise of his leadership and vision, or the fact that his fragile ego demands lavish compliments before he can get down to work? No doubt all the president’s yes-men believe that lavishing him with praise can lead to lavish rewards. 

“Take the former South Dakota governor Kristi Noem, who in 2020 presented him with a ‘bookshelf-sized’ bronze model of Mount Rushmore, portraying Trump’s face next to those of Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln and Roosevelt. Noem is now the secretary of homeland security.  Stephen Miller, who called Trump the ‘most stylish president in our lifetime’, is the White House deputy chief of staff for policy…” 

But Trump might not be oblivious to the motives of his advisors. He recently said that he has no friends and does not trust anyone. 

The Drones Are Coming… 

Sky News reported on June 26: 

In order to defend themselves, Andrius Kubilius [EU’s defense commissioner] says Europeans will require millions of drones and need to start preparing now. ‘Russia can have around five million drones, so we need to have capacities bigger than those in order to prevail,’ he told Sky News… 

“Facing one of the world’s strongest militaries, the Ukrainians used the cheap, adaptable technology to their advantage. It estimates its drone units are now responsible for 80% of Russian frontline losses. This year, Ukraine’s expected to produce more than four million drones… ‘If Ukrainians need four million for 1,200km, we need something like three million drones for one year if the war is starting, if “Day X” is coming,’ [Kubilius] said. 

“A spokesperson from the German Defence Ministry said… ‘Drones are now part of everyday life for soldiers, they are omnipresent and are used extensively in service operations and training,’ they added. 

“The alliance’s leadership has repeatedly said producing, procuring, and protecting against drones is a priority. 

“Defence Secretary John Healey said… ‘Drones now kill more people than traditional artillery in the war in Ukraine and whoever gets new technology into the hands of their armed forces the quickest will win…’ 

“The German Ministry of Defence said it couldn’t reveal stock levels due to security, but a spokesperson confirmed the country is investing in a range of different units, including signing two contracts for attack drones. ‘We are procuring not just a few but quite large quantities and testing them directly with the troops,’ the spokesperson added. However, they agreed with the EU defence commissioner that rather than stockpiling tech which would go out of date, it was better to have a system in place to allow for large quantities to be made quickly in the event of war….” 

All Trade Discussions With Canada Ended 

Politico wrote on June 27: 

“President Donald Trump said Friday he is ‘terminating’ all trade discussions with Canada, effective immediately, because of its Digital Services Tax, and that he would announce new tariffs on the country within the next seven days. 

‘“We have just been informed that Canada, a very difficult Country to TRADE with … has just announced that they are putting a Digital Services Tax on our American Technology Companies, which is a direct and blatant attack on our Country,’ Trump said in a Truth Social post. He accused the country of copying the European Union, “‘which has done the same thing, and is currently under discussion with us.’” 

The New York Post wrote on June 30: 

“Canada abruptly scrapped its plan to enforce a new digital service tax on American tech firms… PM Mark Carney caved just hours before the new levy was slated to go into effect on Monday… The tax would have been applied retroactively, leaving the companies with a US $2 billion (CAN $2.72 billion) bill due at the end of the month… Carney’s office has since revealed the PM spoke with Trump on Sunday night and agreed to halt the tax in a bid to resume talks.” 

Ridiculous Gas Prices in California 

Breitbart wrote on June 27: 

“Assemblyman Carl DeMaio (R-San Diego) warned Thursday that gas prices in California could hit $10 per gallon this summer — not just because of taxes and higher fuel standards, but also pipeline problems… 

“California gas prices are forecasted to rise by 65 cents per gallon after July 1, thanks not only to higher gas taxes but also to new, tougher fuel standards taking effect.” 

There is no possible justification for such outrageous mismanagement. 

ICE’s Misconduct

The Los Angeles Times Newsletter wrote on June 29:

“The U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s immigration raids throughout Los Angeles and surrounding counties have been splashed all over television and social media feeds for nearly a month.

“There were the two women nabbed outside the Airport Courthouse on La Cienega Boulevard on Tuesday after a hearing in a local criminal case. There was the raid at a Hollywood Home Depot on June 19 in which crews of armed, mostly masked agents converged on a parking lot, blocking gates and surrounding the laborers and vendors.

“A Times analysis found that 69% of those arrested during that period had no criminal conviction and 58% had never been charged with a crime. The median age of someone arrested was 38, and that person was likely to be a man. Nearly 48% were Mexican, 16% were from Guatemala and 8% from El Salvador…”

The LA Times also reported about ICE’s arrest of a 6-year-old with cancer outside an L.A. court while his mom is fighting for his release. ICE has been “justifying” its conduct with inevitable “collateral damage.” 58% to 69% is quite a high figure for “collateral damage.”

The Wrap wrote on June 29: 

“The nannies in this town [Santa Monica] are mostly Hispanic and like so many other Latinos doing important jobs in our community, they’re now living in a state of terror. Because ICE agents will pick up anyone with brown skin, regardless of whether they are legal or not, and sometimes even if they are American. It doesn’t seem to matter. … With their faces obscured, no warrants and no identification, ICE is showing up at the Home Depot. They’re showing up at parks. Car washes. Restaurants. Schools… [in] medical office(s) looking for patients and staff… 

“This is the kind of insanity and terror that’s being spread in our city [Los Angeles]. According to the Department of Homeland Security, over 1,600 immigrants have been detained in Southern California over a period of more than two weeks as of June 25th. This equates to roughly 101 arrests per day… ICE is operating aggressively all over… 

“You might see men pull up in one SUV, or several, armed to the hilt and dressed in combat gear surround a young woman no more than 100 lbs or so. That was in Ladera Heights…” 

What impression is the US giving to the world when pictures of military-gear-clad masked ICE agents are launching aggressive raids—pictures which are normally only known in autocratic dictatorships? 

And Now: Stripping Americans of Their Citizenship 

The Guardian wrote on June 30: 

“The Trump administration has codified its efforts to strip some Americans of their US citizenship in a recently published justice department memo that directs attorneys to prioritize denaturalization for naturalized citizens who commit certain crimes. 

“The memo, published on 11 June, calls on attorneys in the department to institute civil proceedings to revoke a person’s United States citizenship if an individual either ‘illegally procured’ naturalization or procured naturalization by ‘concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation’. According to the memo, those subjected to civil proceedings are not entitled to an attorney like they are in criminal cases. And the government has a lighter burden of proof in civil cases than they do in criminal ones…. 

“The directive gives justice department attorneys wider discretion on when to pursue denaturalization, including in instances of lying on immigration forms, cases where there is financial fraud or medical fraud against the US or against private individuals…” 

The HuffPost clarified further on July 1: 

“… The administration intends to widen the pool of eligible individuals, including, for example, those who’ve fraudulently used government programs like the pandemic-era Paycheck Protection Program, and those who’ve committed fraud against people and corporations. And the Trump administration says it won’t be stopping there. ‘These categories do not limit the Civil Division from pursuing any particular case, nor are they listed in a particular order of importance,’ the memo adds. 

“That’s highly concerning, immigration experts warn, and could lead to the administration targeting a wide swath of U.S. citizens, given how amorphous its requirements are… 

“About 25 million people in the U.S. are naturalized citizens, or immigrants who have completed the legal steps to become U.S. citizens… Previously, denaturalization had been used at a larger scale between 1907 and 1967 when an estimated 22,000 people saw their citizenship revoked, including for political reasons that emerged during the McCarthy era and its persecution of suspected communists…. 

“While the process historically focused on people who had lied about their background to obtain U.S. citizenship, the new memo has much broader criteria… Steve Lubet, professor emeritus at the Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law [said:] ‘Many of the categories are so vague as to be meaninglessIt isn’t even clear that they relate to fraudulent procurement, as opposed to post-naturalization conduct…’”

This is deeply alarming indeed. Far from focusing merely on illegal aliens who have been convicted of capital crimes, as it had been originally promised, Trump goes after aliens without papers, legal tourists and other aliens who are here legally, green card holders, birthright citizens, and now even naturalized American citizens. Where will it stop? When is America going to wake up? 

Conscription—Yes or No? 

t-online wrote on June 28: 

“Christoph Heusgen, former head of the Munich Security Conference, supports… [Defense Minister Boris] Pistorius’s plans. If not enough soldiers can be recruited voluntarily, ‘we will have to resort to conscription if necessary,’ Heusgen demands… 

“At the same time, he warns against underestimating Putin: ‘Many people don’t believe Putin is serious.’ The expert knows the Russian president from his time as Angela Merkel’s foreign policy advisor and warns against naivety…” 

ZDF Heute wrote on June 28: 

“Conscription – yes or no? A majority in Germany is in favor… Young people are significantly more skeptical than older people about the question of whether there should be conscription. According to the ZDF Politikbarometer, more than half of 18- to 34-year-olds reject it. 

ZDF Heute also wrote the following in an article from April 19: “Baden-Württemberg’s Prime Minister Kretschmann sees no reasonable alternative on rearmament plans in Germany and Europe. Pacifism now means being prepared for defense.” 

As we reported last week, Bavaria’s Minister President Söder has also spoken out in favor of conscription.

Pistorius Is Spared Defeat

Der Tagesspiegel wrote on June 28: 

“The SPD has averted a looming serious [internal] dispute over the option of mandatory military service according to the plans of Defense Minister Boris Pistorius (SPD). After hours of crisis talks,… an initiative proposal by the Jusos [SPD’s Young Socialists], was amended who had initially rejected the inclusion of compulsory military service in the planned bill.

“The wording up for vote at the party conference on Saturday evening was: ‘We do not want any legally enforceable option for conscription before all measures for voluntary increases have been exhausted. We want to enable measures for the conscription, registration, and military monitoring of young men liable for military service.‘ The motion was… adopted with a few votes against and abstentions…”

Nuclear Bombs for Germany! 

Bild Online wrote on June 28:

“Union parliamentary group leader Jens Spahn is sounding the alarm. In view of the growing threat from Russia, the CDU politician is demanding: Germany should have direct access to nuclear weapons!… 

“Although American nuclear bombs are stored in Germany, that’s not enough for Spahn. The CDU politician is demanding a share in the nuclear weapons of France and Great Britain. Or even a separate European nuclear umbrella. That will cost a lot of money. ‘But if you want protection, you have to finance it,’ said Spahn. Germany as a nuclear power? Spahn says: Yes!” 

Der Tagesspiegel added on June 28:

“[Spahn:] ‘We should have a debate about an independent European nuclear umbrella.’ That will only work with German leadership, Spahn continued: ‘France will almost certainly not let us touch its red button, to stay with the metaphor.'”

Reactions to Spahn’s Proposal

BR24 wrote on June 29:

“Critical voices [of Spahn’s proposal] came not only from the opposition, but also from the ranks of the coalition partner, the SPD. SPD foreign policy expert Rolf Mützenich accused Spahn of playing with fire ‘when he calls for European, possibly even German, nuclear weapons’…

“Spahn’s idea of a European nuclear umbrella under German leadership ‘border[s] on the well-known megalomania in German history,’ explained Left Party parliamentary group leader Sören Pellmann. ‘The then Defense Minister Franz Josef Strauss was already defeated by such unfortunate demands.’…

“The AfD parliamentary group’s defense policy spokesman, Rüdiger Lucassen, was more supportive… ‘A German nuclear weapons program is… the logical consequence,’ he said…”

Jens Spahn’s Faith

The Protestant “Sonntagsblatt” wrote on June 30:

“Jens Spahn is a politician with a noticeably strong religious foundation. The CDU/CSU parliamentary group leader in the Bundestag clearly professes his Catholic faith, but is quite willing to openly name grievances within the church. In the public debate, he positions himself as a devout Catholic, as a gay man with political responsibility, and as someone who does not see religion as a private matter.

Spahn’s religious upbringing is consistently Catholic: He attended a Catholic kindergarten and elementary school and went to a Catholic high school. He served as an altar boy and was involved in youth work. This influence continues to this day. Faith is his ‘compass and foundation,’ Spahn wrote in a 2018 guest article for the ‘Welt’ newspaper. It gives him support, security, and serenity.

“At the same time, he urges the church to focus more on core tasks. He defines these as pastoral care, religious education, and charitable work. He cites the inviolability of human life, the dignity of the sick or dying, and organ donation as examples. 

“This stance reveals, on the one hand, a conservative understanding of the separation of church and state, but on the other hand, a clear interest in the public relevance of religion – as long as it focuses on the spiritual and social. At the same time, he openly opposes certain church teachings, particularly in dealing with homosexuality. He pointedly commented on the refusal to bless his marriage in Bild am Sonntag: ‘The Catholic Church blesses motorcycles and hamsters – but not us.’

“Spahn’s relationship with non-Christian religious communities, especially Islam, is less nuanced… While he emphasizes that Muslim life belongs to Germany… he does not shy away from sweeping disparagements and insinuations. For example, at an event at the Evangelical Academy in Berlin in 2024, Spahn claimed that ‘Muslim culture’ is permeated with anti-Semitism, misogyny [hatred of women], and homophobia.

“Spahn rarely or never comments on other world religions. Judaism appears to him almost exclusively in the context of the State of Israel or in connection with anti-Semitism. Buddhism and Hinduism, on the other hand, do not seem to be an issue for him.”

 Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News

Strategic Deception?

The New York Post wrote on June 21:

“President Trump caught the world off-guard Saturday by bombing three Iranian nuclear sites [Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan]  — after his apparently strategic deception indicating that such strikes weren’t imminent… Trump said Thursday he would make a decision in the ‘next two weeks’ to allow more time for negotiations, giving the sense of reprieve amid fevered speculation he might join Israel’s airstrikes…

“A source close to the White House said Trump decided Friday — just one day after unveiling his two-week timeframe — to strike Iran with ‘overwhelming force’…”

The Daily Mail wrote on June 22 that “Officials admitted that the [B-2 strikes] on the Fordow site, a deep underground nuclear enrichment facility, may not have been entirely destroyed in the operation.”

Attacks on US Bases in the Middle East?

Breitbart wrote on June 21:

“An Iranian state TV news anchor showed a map of U.S. bases in the Middle East, which says are all ‘within fire range of Iran.’ The anchor goes on to say ‘Mr. Trump, you started it, and we will end it.’ The broadcast, posted widely on social media… follows a U.S. Air Force strike on Iranian nuclear facilities ordered by President Donald Trump on Saturday [the Sabbath]…

“… before the attack, Iranian Defense Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh warned this month, ‘all U.S. bases are within our reach and we will boldly target them.’ These include bases in Egypt, Saudia Arabia, Iraq, United Arib Emerits, Kuwait, Qatar, and Syria…. There are thousands of U.S. troops assigned to these bases…

“Iran tried to downplay the impact of the strikes by the U.S. on the nuclear sites… ‘The site had been evacuated a long time ago and the damages are not irreversible,’ Mohammad Ghalibaf, the speaker of Iran’s Parliament, wrote…”

Russia has declared that it could give Iran nukes. Meetings between Russia and Iran are taking place. China has condemned America’s attack. The fear is that the “new axis of evil” – China, Russia, Iran and North Korea – will combine forces in one way or another against America and Israel. Iran subsequently “attacked” an American base in Qatar, but little damage was done and no American was injured or killed in this “very weak” and “expected” attack (BBC, dated June 24). About 8,000 US citizens live in Qatar.

Terrorist Attacks Inside the USA?

Daily Mail wrote on June 22:

“Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene – one of Trump’s closest allies in Congress and a conservative firebrand who has openly opposed war with Iran – took to X soon after the bombs dropped. She prayed that Americans would not be targeted by terrorists ‘on our homeland’ in retaliation for Trump’s operative strike… Greene wrote: ‘Every time America is on the verge of greatness, we get involved in another foreign war…’

“The Georgia Congresswoman added that getting involved in a Middle Eastern war will ‘put America last, kill innocent people, are making us broke, and will ultimately lead to our destruction.’”

The New York Post added on June 21:

“Trump ran for president three times on a platform of opposing military entanglements in the Middle East — slamming George W. Bush for invading Iraq in 2003 and Barack Obama for intervening in Libya and Syria — and he insisted Friday that any attack on Iran would be limited.”

Still, the Independent speculated on June 22 that Trump might have gambled his presidency; that Muslim and many American voters won’t support him any longer; and that he had embroiled himself in another never-ending war. Trump declared that if Iran retaliated against America in any way, targets in Iran would be attacked and destroyed. (But Trump did not follow up with that threat, note the previous article.)

Daily Mail’s Peter Hitchens wrote on June 22: “Don’t celebrate this ultra-violence. Trump’s broken all the rules and plunged us into a forever war.”

This does not appear that way for the moment, but note articles below.

ABC News wrote on June 22:

“In the wake of President Donald Trump’s ‘massive precision strikes’ on Iran, concerns have been raised both for Americans in the region and at home. A principal area of worry is cyberattacks by Iranian state actors, including targeting the banking system or energy grid…. Such attacks have already infiltrated U.S. water and wastewater systems…”

Closing the Strait of Hormuz?

The New York Post wrote on June 22:

“Iran’s parliament has voted to close the Strait of Hormuz, the vital shipping channel through which around 20% of the world’s daily oil flows. The move, which could block $1 billion in oil shipments per day, is likely to send oil prices soaring. It will come into effect pending a final decision by Iran’s Supreme Council…

“The strait connecting the Gulf of Oman with the Persian Gulf is one of the world’s most critical chokepoints — just 20 miles wide at its narrowest point. Shipping lanes in the strait  — the area that is deep enough for ships to pass — are even narrower at less than two miles wide in each direction, making them much more vulnerable to attacks and threats of closure…. The channel is shallow, making it a particular target for underwater mining, while the narrowness of the strait makes passing vessels vulnerable to attack from shore-based missiles or interception by patrol boats or helicopters…”

Nothing further has been said on this, and Iran has not closed the Strait of Hormuz for now, following the ceasefire with Israel, but the threat is still looming.

International Reactions

The Guardian wrote on June 22:

Gulf states, which historically have been regional rivals with nearby Iran and critical of its nuclear ambitions, expressed serious concern at the US strikes, amid the risk of retaliation against US military bases hosted in their countries. The United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Oman, which had been mediating Iran-US nuclear talks, criticised the US attack and urged de-escalation…

Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest oil exporter, was on a high security alert after the US strikes, expressing ‘great concern’… The UN secretary general, António Guterres, said he was ‘gravely alarmed’… Iraq’s government spokesperson, Basim Alawadi, said: ‘This military escalation constitutes a grave threat to peace and security in the Middle East…’ Pakistan, the only nuclear-armed Muslim country and a longtime Washington ally, said the US attacks ‘violate all norms of international law’ [Pakistan, which has strong ties to Iran, had just nominated Trump for the Nobel peace prize.]…

Russia ‘strongly condemned’ the US strikes, calling them ‘irresponsible’, a ‘gross violation of international law’ and a ‘dangerous escalation’…

“The French foreign minister, Jean-Noël Barrot, expressed ‘concern’ at the US strikes and said France ‘did not take part in these strikes or the planning of them’…

Venezuela’s foreign minister, Yván Gil, said his country ‘condemned US military aggression against Iran’… Cuba’s president, Miguel Díaz-Canel, strongly condemned the US bombing…

Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, congratulated Trump in a video posted on social media… Ukraine said the US and Israeli strikes on Iran were justified…”

The article also pointed out that “EU figures [as well as Great Britain] sought to maintain their focus on diplomacy,” rather than taking a strong position on America’s attack on Iran. However, voices from the German government’s SPD party strongly condemned America’s action (coined “Midnight Hammer”).

Destroyed Or Not Destroyed?

Daily Mail reported on June 24:

“A leaked intelligence assessment claiming Donald Trump’s strikes on Iran did not destroy Tehran’s nuclear program is ‘flat-out wrong’, the White House has claimed. The [allegedly classified] report, conducted by the Defense Intelligence Agency and leaked by CNN, claims Saturday’s airstrike on three Iranian nuclear sites only set the country’s program back by months instead of completely destroying it. Trump claimed the strikes ‘completely and totally obliterated’ [the nuclear sites]

“The president brokered a fragile ceasefire between Iran and Israel that appeared to hold Tuesday after initially faltering, causing Trump to launch a foul-mouthed tirade that saw him drop an F-bomb on live TV… Prime Minister… Netanyahu, whom Trump demanded turn the planes around [which did NOT occur, but the planned strike was significantly scaled down and became a “symbolic” hit on a radar station], refrained from launching further strikes on Iran today following his phone call with his American counterpart…“Meanwhile, Trump and other top Republicans have issued warnings against Iranian sleeper cells that infiltrated the US…”

CNN added on June 24:

“Two of the people familiar with the assessment said Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium was not destroyed. One of the people said the centrifuges are largely ‘intact.’ Another source said that the intelligence assessed enriched uranium was moved out of the sites prior to the US strikes. ‘So the (DIA) assessment is that the US set them back maybe a few months, tops,’ this person added…

“US officials believe Iran also maintains secret nuclear facilities that were not targeted in the strike and remain operational, according to two sources familiar with the matter…”

Trump described all of this as “fake news.”

Iran Claims Victory

Almayadeen, which describes itself as an “Arab Independent Media Satellite,” wrote on June 24:

“The Iranian Supreme National Security Council announced on Tuesday that the Islamic Republic had achieved a significant strategic victory, asserting that it had ‘forced the enemies to seek a ceasefire.’”

Missing Uranium

The Independent wrote on June 24:

“… as the smoke cleared over the three underground facilities hit by [American] stealth bombers and cruise missiles over the weekend, experts say the result may actually bring an Iranian nuclear bomb closer to reality and raise the risk of greater U.S. involvement in the conflict [as Iran has now the will power to do this]… the showpiece of Trump’s attack — the attack on the Fordow nuclear facility, built deep underground, which required the use of 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs — was limited in its effectiveness because Iran had time to evacuate and remove equipment before the strikes… Fordow has a symbolic importance to people, but it is by no means the only underground facility associated with Iran’s nuclear program…

“One of the primary motivations for launching the attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities was to destroy Iran’s ability to enrich uranium. But the country has amassed a stockpile over the years of an estimated 400 kilograms of highly enriched uranium — enough to make around 10 nuclear weapons if it were further enriched from 60 percent where it is now, to the 90 percent required to construct a device… “

“Vice President JD Vance conceded on Sunday that the stockpile is still in Iranian hands and its whereabouts are unknown… There are also concerns that Iran’s nuclear program, or what is left of it, will move underground. That would begin with the stockpile of enriched uranium that is currently unaccounted for…

“There’s a risk that if the United States wants to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran in the future, it’s going to need to strike Iran again and again. Because Iran is going to retain that knowledge, the risk of a nuclear-armed Iran cannot be eliminated…”

Trump declared on Tuesday that this was the last time that the USA would help Israel in its fight against Iran. He also stated again on Thursday that the nuclear sites were totally destroyed and that Iran did not have the time to evacuate the sites and remove the uranium.

The Telegraph added on June 25:

“Iran claims to have smuggled almost all of the country’s highly enriched uranium to a secret location before the US launched strikes on its [three] nuclear bases [through] a barrage of submarine-launched missiles early on Sunday morning. But officials believe that most of the material at Fordow and Iran’s other facilities had been moved elsewhere before the strikes.

“Iran has vowed to continue enriching uranium in defiance of Donald Trump, raising further concerns over its nuclear programme. Takht Ravanchi, Iran’s deputy foreign minister, rejected claims that Tehran would abandon its nuclear programme, telling the Germany broadcaster ARD: ‘No one can tell us what we should and should not do.’

“Following the mission, codenamed Midnight Hammer, the US president claimed to have ‘obliterated’ Iran’s nuclear aspirations in the wave of strikes. He said the US had taken the bomb ‘right out of Iran’s hands’ by inflicting ‘monumental damage’ on the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan facilities. However, doubt has been cast on Mr Trump’s claims after senior US officials admitted they did not know the fate of Iran’s near-bomb-grade uranium stockpile…

“Two Israeli officials with knowledge of the intelligence told The New York Times that Iran had transferred equipment and uranium outside Fordow in recent days. There was also evidence to suggest Iran had moved its 400kg stockpile of 60 per cent enriched uranium, which had been stored inside Isfahan, to a secret location… According to satellite imagery, trucks, bulldozers and security convoys appeared to swarm the Fordow facility two days before the US strikes. Analysts at TS2 Space, a Polish defence firm, suggested it revealed a ‘frantic effort’ to move centrifuges or shielding materials…”

Iranians Demand Regime Change

The Daily Mail wrote on June 23:

“Iranian-Americans have backed President Trump’s strikes on their home nation as they hope the intervention could trigger a revolt against the Ayatollah’s regime. In Maryland, one of the largest Iranian communities in America where over 16,000 Iranian people live, residents have expressed a cautious optimism over the strikes..

“Pushing for regime change in Iran has long been avoided by US presidents, before Donald Trump on Sunday night stunned the Middle East again as he called to ‘MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN.’ In a shock post on Sunday night to Truth Social, Trump wrote: ‘It’s not politically correct to use the term, ‘Regime Change,’ but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn’t there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!’ 

“The message from the president directly contradicted remarks from his top allies just hours earlier, with Vice President JD Vance telling ABC: ‘We don’t want to achieve regime change. We want to achieve the end of the Iranian nuclear program.’… However, direct American intervention to end to the Ayatollah’s regime is exactly what many Iranians in America are hoping for…

“The divide between the desired outcome of regime change and skepticism over how to achieve it follows decades of US presidents floating strikes on Iran but backing down due to the risks involved, before Trump pulled the trigger on Saturday night… Trump’s strikes did not target or kill any civilians in Iran.”

Reza Pahlavi Advocates Regime Change

The Sun wrote on June 24:

“IRAN’S brutal regime could kill tens of millions of people by smuggling nuclear material and unleashing it on Europe, the rogue nation’s exiled prince told The Sun. Reza Pahlavi [the exiled son of Iran’s last Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi] warned [that Iran’s current] leaders could still acquire a dirty bomb… ‘Terrorism has many means of hurting big time. Nobody anticipated 9/11. It was a terrorist attack. What keeps people not to worry about the fact that the call of these terrorist networks of sleeper cells could smuggle in a few grams of enriched plutonium, throw it in a lake in Europe and instantaneously kill tens of millions of people who will be radioactively attacked. 

“‘You don’t need a missile or warhead for that. We have at least eliminated the imminent threat of the regime. Does that mean that the regime still doesn’t have the capability to acquire nuclear weapons or a dirty bomb by purchasing it from the North Koreans? ‘It doesn’t eliminate that, that’s the entire point… And hopefully the world this time will be wise enough to say, let’s not throw this regime a lifeline. This is time to put an end to it….’”

The Sun added the following regarding the late Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi:

“What led to his downfall initially however was 1963 The White Revolution – a series of social, political and economic reforms that Mohammad Reza initiated. This looked to both modernise and westernise Iran. But the reforms were perceived as controversial and led to some resistance from various religious and political factions. On February 11, 1979, Iran’s army declared its neutrality, paving the way for the fall of US-backed Shah Mohammad Reza. He died in exile in Egypt in 1980.”

Trump’s Fatal Naiveté Toward the Iranian Regime

Die Welt wrote on June 25:

“The Iranian regime has been significantly weakened by the attacks by Israel and the US. This is good news for the Iranian people, for Israel, the Middle East, and the world. However, those who hoped—like many people in Iran and Israel—that the rule of the mullahs in Iran would finally end were disappointed. The regime will not be overthrown. It will continue to massively oppress the Iranians; it will continue to pose a threat to Israel…

“Among the Iranian people, these attacks have sparked great hopes that they will soon finally be free again. They even dreamed of dancing in the streets. However, these hopes were dashed by the ceasefire negotiated by Trump. The Iranian leadership remains in power.

“Trump quickly abandoned the regime change that he briefly flirted with. This proves once again that one cannot rely on the erratic and unpredictable US president. Israel cannot do that either…

“He urged the Jewish state not to resist the ceasefire violation [by Iran]. So that he can pose as a peacemaker, he is abandoning the Iranians and Israelis. After all, no one should steal his show. Trump’s ceasefire is a lifeline for the regime. Asked whether he still believes that Iran is committed to peace, Trump affirmed on Tuesday. A completely absurd view of a dictatorship of ayatollahs and Revolutionary Guards who adhere to an Islamist martyr ideology. It is this ideology that makes the Iranian regime so dangerous – and to which Trump unfortunately shows himself naive… Peace in the Middle East is only possible without the Iranian regime.

“Shortly after the ceasefire, the rulers in Iran began raids and arrests of opposition figures, accusing them of spying for Israel. A wave of death sentences and executions threatens. The mullahs are preparing new mass crimes against the Iranian people… Anyone who argues that the Iranians themselves must succeed in overthrowing the regime and that they could simply elect other rulers is naively misunderstanding the repressive nature of the regime and the pseudo-elections that are being boycotted by millions of Iranians for good reasons.

In Germany, this regime was long downplayed to justify close economic and political ties. Germany is Iran’s most important trading partner within the European Union. And for decades, Germany has refused to take sufficient non-military measures against the Islamic Republic…. Appeasement and collaboration must finally end.”

AI Spreads False Information About the Israel-Iran War

BBC wrote on June 21:

“A wave of disinformation has been unleashed online since Israel began strikes on Iran last week…

“Our analysis found a number of videos – created using artificial intelligence – boasting of Iran’s military capabilities, alongside fake clips showing the aftermath of strikes on Israeli targets. The three most viewed fake videos BBC Verify found have collectively amassed over 100 million views across multiple platforms.

“Pro-Israeli accounts have also shared disinformation online, mainly by recirculating old clips of protests and gatherings in Iran, falsely claiming that they show mounting dissent against the government and support among Iranians for Israel’s military campaign…

“One widely shared post claimed to show a jet damaged after being shot down in the Iranian desert. However, signs of AI manipulation were evident: civilians around the jet were the same size as nearby vehicles, and the sand showed no signs of impact.  Another video with 21.1 million views on TikTok claimed to show an Israeli F-35 being shot down by air defences, but the footage actually came from a flight simulator video game. TikTok removed the footage after being approached by BBC Verify.

“Official sources in Iran and Israel have shared some of the fake images. State media in Tehran has shared fake footage of strikes and an AI-generated image of a downed F-35 jet, while a post shared by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) received a community note on X for using old, unrelated footage of missile barrages…”

Trump—a Different Man?

The Independent wrote on June 19:

“Veteran rocker Rod Stewart has renounced his friendship with Donald Trump, claiming the businessman completely changed after becoming president of the United States. The 80-year-old singer said he previously had a close relationship with Trump as the pair have owned nearby multi-million pound properties in Palm Beach, Florida, since 1991 and 1985 respectively.

“Speaking to Radio Times, Stewart said: ‘I’m not a great fan of Trump. I knew him very, very well. I used to go to his house.’ He added that he lives ‘literally half a mile away’ from him. ‘We’re both on the beach. I used to go to his Christmas parties. He’s always been a bit of a man’s man. I liked him for that. But he didn’t, as far as I’m concerned, treat women very well. But since he became president, he became another guy. Somebody I didn’t know,’ he said.”

Controversial Decision by the Court of Appeals

The Daily Mail wrote on June 19:

“Donald Trump celebrated a victory over Gavin Newsom after an appeals [court] allowed him to keep control of National Guard troops he deployed to Los Angeles to handle anti-ICE riots…. The decision halts a ruling from a lower court judge who found Trump acted illegally… The deployment was the first by a president of a state National Guard without the governor´s permission since 1965.

“In its [unsigned] decision, a three-judge panel on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals [two judges appointed by Trump, the third by Clinton] unanimously concluded it was likely Trump lawfully exercised his authority in federalizing control of the guard. It said that while presidents don’t have unfettered power to seize control of a state’s guard, the Trump administration had presented enough evidence to show it had a defensible rationale for doing so, citing violent acts by protesters…

“It also found that even if the federal government failed to notify the governor of California before federalizing the National Guard as required by law, Newsom had no power to veto the president´s order… The court case could have wider implications on the president´s power to deploy soldiers within the United States after Trump directed immigration officials to prioritize deportations from other Democratic-run cities.”

NPR added on June 20:

“The court emphasized the decision only pertained to Trump’s authority to deploy the Guard and not what he could do with the troops once deployed. The president called the decision a big win that would have an impact, not just in California, but in any other state where he decides to call in the National Guard.”

This very troublesome decision ignores the wording of the statute in question. If it stands, it gives a president almost unchecked dictatorial powers. This is clearly not what the “Founding Fathers” intended. Note the next article.

The Legal Fight Between Trump and Newsom Continues

The Los Angeles Times wrote on June 24:

“The Trump administration must turn over a cache of documents, photos, internal reports and other evidence detailing the activities of the military in Southern California, a federal judge ruled Tuesday, handing a procedural victory to the state in its fight to rein in thousands of troops under the president’s command.

“Ordering ‘expedited, limited discovery,’ Senior U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer in San Francisco also authorized California lawyers to depose key administration officials and signaled that he might review questions about how long California National Guard troops remain under federal control.”

The American Gestapo?

Breitbart wrote on June 20:

“Author Stephen King compared Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to Nazis, framing them as an ‘American Gestapo.’… King issued his denunciation of ICE in response to the Trump administration increasing raids and deportations in cities across the country…”

In this regard, please note the next article.

Churches Oppose Trump Immigration Policies

The Daily Mail wrote on June 20:

“A bishop appointed by Pope Leo [of the Catholic Diocese of San Diego, Michael Pham] descended on a California court [in San Diego] today with a dozen other priests and faith leaders in an attempt to persuade ICE against deporting migrants… he was among 16 who went to the Southern California federal courthouse to support the migrants in the US legally who were pleading their cases…

“Dramatic and emotional scenes have played out in immigration courts across the country where migrants who went from legal to illegal in seconds are taken away. This includes mothers who have been ripped away from their US-born kids…

“When those migrants are arriving in court, Trump federal prosecutors will inform the judge that they want to dismiss the case. However, that doesn’t mean the legal claim can forward. Instead, with the case out of the hands of the court, ICE now has jurisdiction to make an arrest

“[Scott Santarosa of Our Lady of Guadalupe Parish] recounted how they witnessed the case of [a] migrant woman whose case had been closed for 20 years, however, the Trump administration had found a loophole to reopen it. ‘The messaging from the government that, “We’re going after criminals,” is really not a true narrative because this is clearly not a criminal. This is the government figuring out whose case can we open up again to go after so we can deport,’ he said.’….

“Priests and churches across the country have spoken out against Trump’s deportation policies… When Trump first won re-election, the United Methodist Church issued a blistering rebuke of the president-elect two days after his victory.  ‘The lessons teach us the dangers of silence in the face of threats to human rights,’ the Council of Bishops wrote on Nov. 7. ‘We therefore reject rhetoric, policies, and actions that demean or discriminate against any of God’s children and will be vigilant in defending the rights of the vulnerable and speaking out against oppression.’ 

“Before becoming the leader of the Catholic Church, Pope Leo had been incredibly critical of MAGA immigration policies. Earlier this year, the new pope called out Vice President JD Vance, calling him outright ‘wrong‘ as viral social media spat about his faith went viral.”

Rather than defending the indefensible, true Christians should allow themselves to see, and, when appropriate, say clearly what is going on. Note our recent StandingWatch program, titled, “The End of the American Empire?

In regard to the end of America, note the following articles.

America’s End… Coming!

The Hill wrote on June 20:

“My Albanian-born father-in-law was an American patriot. In the mid-20th century, he served for decades as a CIA operative, quietly fighting against the spread of communism in Europe and Southeast Asia. Before his death at age 92, he lamented America’s future, saying, ‘I’m glad I won’t be around to see the end.’ Long before the U.S. was on the brink of World War III I shared his bittersweet pessimism, prompted by the “death spiral math” found on the U.S. Debt Clock.

“The ‘clock’ ticks real-time government data showing the ever-growing national debt — $36.9 trillion as of this writing — the most owed by any country or empire in human history. Nonetheless, this decades-long travesty of overspending, attributed to presidents from both parties, is still manageable if the U.S. gross domestic product — estimated at $29.2 trillion in 2024 — were to exceed the nearly $37 trillion national debt. At least, that is the economic theory recently espoused by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent who stated, ‘If the economy grows faster than the debt, we stabilize the country.’

“Bessent’s philosophy of ‘we can grow our way out of debt’ supports adding an estimated $3.3 trillion to the national debt, according to the Congressional Budget Office, if President Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ were to become law…

“Bessent’s growth fantasy is a joke when viewed through the lens of history and facts. The national debt has exceeded GDP since 2013, and the Debt Clock shows the U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio today at 123 percent. Reducing that unwieldy ratio requires a sustained economic boom not seen since the decades following World War II… Does anyone honestly believe that Trump’s ‘Golden Age of America’ policies will stimulate levels of explosive growth needed to reduce the debt-to-GDP ratio from 123 percent to double digits?

“Bessent’s ‘we can grow our way out of debt’ wish-casting could easily be thwarted, starting with Trump’s trade war. Then add untamed inflation, an aging population, ongoing global crises, natural disasterssupply-chain issues, AI’s unpredictable impact and Trump’s self-inflicted scientific brain drain resulting from cuts to research funding. Moreover, a shortage of highly skilled tech workers, the fallout from Trump’s immigration policy, and economic uncertainty all contribute to slow growth, while government spending remains unchecked. [Add to this now America’s war with Iran.]

“No wonder the World Bank recently issued new economic projections contradicting Bessent’s optimism. In 2024, the U.S. economy grew by 2.8 percent. However, for 2025, the World Bank’s initial downward forecast of 1.8 percent growth has again been revised to 1.4 percent… the debt-to-GDP ratio is projected to reach 140 percent by 2029 — the year Trump leaves office.

“Most Americans don’t know that the two largest federal expenditures are Medicaid and Medicare, totaling nearly $1.7 trillion, followed by Social Security at $1.5 trillion, according to the Debt Clock. Cuts to these massive programs are inevitable and will be painful [unless God prevents this from happening for the benefit of His people.]

“On the tax receipt side, the Debt Clock displays $5.1 trillion in revenue, relatively small compared to the $36.9 trillion national debt. This debt has risen so rapidly that interest has reached $1.03 trillion — the third-largest item in the federal budget…

War is expensive… Our enemies are keenly aware of America’s economic vulnerabilities. More defense spending means more borrowing and, eventually, the U.S. could cease to be a great power… But unlike my late father-in-law, many of us reading this might be around to see the end.”

Indeed.

Trump, War and the Constitution

On June 19, the Ron Paul Institute published the following article by Judge Andrew P. Napolitano:

“Has the United States become what President Donald Trump recently condemned? Can the president fight any war he wishes? Can Congress fund any war it chooses? Are there constitutional and legal requirements that must first be met before war is waged? These questions should be central to a debate over the U.S. involvement in Ukraine, Gaza and Iran. Sadly, there has been no great debate. The mainstream media are mouthing what the CIA is telling them, and only a few websites and podcasts are challenging the government’s reckless, immoral, illegal and unconstitutional wars

“Under the Constitution, only Congress can declare war on a nation or group. The last time it did so was to initiate American involvement in World War II. But Congress has given away limited authority to presidents and permitted them to fight undeclared wars — such as the War Powers Resolution of 1973 and President George W. Bush’s invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Congress has not only not declared war on Russia or Gaza or Iran; it has not authorized the use of American forces in those countries. Yet, it has given the president a blank check and authorized him to spend it on military equipment for Ukraine and Israel however he sees fit.

“President Donald Trump came into office promising to end America’s forever wars

“The War Powers Resolution, which requires presidential notification to Congress of the use of American military force, is unconstitutional because it consists of Congress giving away one of its core functions — declaring war. The Supreme Court has characterized delegating away core functions as violative of the separation of powers, and thus unconstitutional

“Last month, in Saudi Arabia, Trump condemned the neocons’ forever wars and western military intervention in the Middle East. We now know he didn’t mean what he said. We have reposed the Constitution for safekeeping into the hands of those who ignore it. The consequences are deaths of innocents and the undermining of constitutional norms. And the U.S. continues to be what Trump verbally condemned….”

America’s Wars Will End America

The Ron Paul Institute published this follow-up article on June 21—which was published just BEFORE Trump’s attack on Iran:

“War has become a huge money-making venture, and the U.S. government, with its vast military empire, is one of its best buyers and sellers… Incredibly, America’s military forces aren’t being deployed abroad to protect our freedoms here at home. Rather, they’re being used to guard oil fields, build foreign infrastructure and protect the financial interests of the corporate elite…

“… these wars abroad aren’t making America—or the rest of the world—any safer, are certainly not making America great again, and are undeniably digging the U.S. deeper into debt. War spending is bankrupting America… Since 2001, the U.S. government has spent more than $10 trillion waging its endless wars, much of it borrowed, much of it wasted, all of it paid for in blood and taxpayer dollars… America’s expanding military empire is bleeding the country dry at a rate of more than $32 million per hour…  

“Americans have thus far allowed themselves to be spoon-fed a steady diet of pro-war propaganda that keeps them content to wave flags with patriotic fervor and less inclined to look too closely at the mounting body counts, the ruined lives, the ravaged countries, the blowback arising from ill-advised targeted-drone killings and bombing campaigns in foreign lands, or the transformation of our own homeland into a warzone...

“The U.S. government is not making the world any safer. It’s making the world more dangerous…

“The nation’s infrastructure is in shambles. Public schools are underfunded. Mental health care is collapsing. Basic needs like housing, transportation, and clean water go unmet. Meanwhile, government contractors drop bombs on third-world villages and call it strategy… Bridges collapse, water systems fail, students drown in debt, and veterans sleep on the streets—while the Pentagon builds runways in the desert and funds proxy wars no one can explain

“We are funding our own collapse… We don’t need another war… In the end, it’s not just the empire that falls. It’s the republic it hollowed out along the way.”

America WILL fall. It is inevitable.

Too Many Federal Holidays?

Newsmax wrote on June 19:

“Juneteenth became a federal holiday in 2021 under President Joe Biden. Perhaps it won’t be a holiday much longer. On Thursday, President Donald Trump made no declarations about Juneteenth but did post a message on his Truth Social account decrying Americans having too many paid days off. He wrote: ‘Too many non-working holidays in America. It is costing our Country BILLIONS OF DOLLARS to keep all of these businesses closed. The workers don’t want it either! Soon we’ll end up having a holiday for every once working day of the year. It must change if we are going to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!’

“Trump did honor Juneteenth during his first term as president. In 2018, he issued a message which in part read, ‘Melania and I send our best wishes to those celebrating Juneteenth. … As a Nation, we vow to never forget the millions of African Americans who suffered the evils of slavery. Together, we honor the unbreakable spirit and countless contributions of generations of African Americans to the story of American greatness. Today and every day, we recommit ourselves to defending the self-evident truth, boldly declared by our Founding Fathers, that all people are created equal.’ [This would include undocumented aliens in this country, wouldn’t it?]

“Trump repeated a similar message the following year, writing, ‘Across our country, the contributions of African Americans continue to enrich every facet of American life. This Juneteenth, as we vow always to uphold the God-given rights of all Americans, we pay tribute to the indomitable spirit of African Americans.’

“And again in 2020, Trump’s message included, ‘This Juneteenth, we commit, as one Nation, to live true to our highest ideals and to build always toward a freer, stronger country that values the dignity and boundless potential of all Americans.’…

“Juneteenth celebrates the end of slavery in the United States by commemorating June 19, 1865, when Union soldiers brought the news of freedom to enslaved Black people in Galveston, Texas. Their freedom came more than two years after President Abraham Lincoln liberated slaves in the Confederacy by signing the Emancipation Proclamation during the Civil War. ‘I did something good. I made it famous. I made Juneteenth very famous,’ Trump said in 2020 before holding a rally on June 19. ‘It’s actually an important event, it’s an important time. But nobody had heard of it. Very few people have heard of it.’”

Trump Blasts Fox News

Newsmax wrote on June 19:

“President Donald Trump blasted Fox News Thursday after the network released a new poll showing that just over half of Americans [53%] approve of his handling of border security… while 46% disapprove. On immigration, 46% approve of the president’s policies, while 53% disapprove, according to the poll… ‘They are always wrong and negative. It’s why MAGA HATES FoxNews, even though their anchors are GREAT…’

“Trump’s worst marks, according to the survey, were on the economy, where 40% approve, 58% disapprove, and inflation, where 34% approve, 64% disapprove…”

The poll might very well have been wrong, as perhaps many more people than listed may disapprove of Trump’s conduct. Of course, Trump also blasted CNN, MSNBC and other outlets for their reporting on the actual damage caused during the American attack on Iran.

NATO No Reason to Exist?

Politico wrote on June 20:

“Italian Defense Minister Guido Crosetto said Friday that NATO ‘as it is, no longer has a reason to exist’ …

“Crosetto’s comments come ahead of the NATO leaders’ summit in The Hague next week, where the alliance is likely to agree on a higher spending target of 5 percent of GDP to placate U.S. President Donald Trump.”

Italy was one of the 12 original members forming NATO in 1949. Right now, NATO counts 32 members.

NATO to Placate Trump?

BBC News wrote on June 21:

“[Trump] has been highly critical of Nato too – even questioning its very foundation of collective defence… The [NATO] summit takes place at the World Forum in The Hague over two days, on Tuesday and Wednesday next week…

“Some have suggested the brevity of the summit is in part to cater to the US president’s attention span and dislike of long meetings. But a shorter summit with fewer subjects discussed will, more importantly, help hide divisions… specific discussions about Russia and the war in Ukraine will be muted. It’s the one big issue that now divides Europe and America… Trump has already shattered Nato’s united front by talking to Putin and withholding military support to Ukraine.

“… contentious issues have been stripped from the summit. Not least to avoid a schism with Trump. Leaders were supposed to discuss a new Russia strategy, but it’s not on the agenda.

“Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been invited to the summit dinner, but he won’t be taking part in the main discussions of the North Atlantic Council.

“[Secretary General Mark] Rutte will be hoping that his first summit as secretary general will be short and sweet. But with Trump at odds with most of his allies on Russia, the greatest threat facing the Alliance, there’s no guarantee it’ll go according to plan.”

Rutte, a Dutch politician who succeeded Jens Stoltenberg as NATO’s Secretary General last year, has gone out of his way to woe and praise Trump during the NATO meetings. Rutte’s conduct has been described by the media as “embarrassing” and “demeaning.”

Trump Can Pull the Plug on the Internet

Politico wrote on June 23:

“Donald Trump’s return to the White House is forcing Europe to reckon with a major digital vulnerability: The U.S. holds a kill switch over its internet. As the U.S. administration raises the stakes in a geopolitical poker game that began when Trump started his trade war, Europeans are waking up to the fact that years of over-reliance on a handful of U.S. tech giants have given Washington a winning hand. The fatal vulnerability is Europe’s near-total dependency on U.S. cloud providers.

“Cloud computing is the lifeblood of the internet, powering everything from the emails we send and videos we stream to industrial data processing and government communications. Just three American behemoths — Amazon, Microsoft, and Google — hold more than two-thirds of the regional market, putting Europe’s online existence in the hands of firms cozying up to the U.S. president to fend off looming regulations and fines… ‘Europe blindly trusted the U.S. to always be there, and always on their side,’ said Bria, the University College London professor. ‘The situation feels very different now.’”

Putin: Ukraine Belongs to Us

Reuters wrote on June 20:

“Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Friday that in his view the whole of Ukraine was ‘ours’ and cautioned that advancing Russian forces could take the Ukrainian city of Sumy as part of a bid to carve out a buffer zone along the border…

“Asked about fresh Russian advances, Putin told the St Petersburg International Economic Forum that he considered Russians and Ukrainians to be one people and ‘in that sense the whole of Ukraine is ours’…. ‘We have a saying, or a parable,’ Putin said. ‘Where the foot of a Russian soldier steps, that is ours.’”

Germany’s Suppression of Freedom of Speech and Assembly?

Deutsche Welle wrote on June 19:

“Hundreds of demonstrators assembled for a march in the German city of Frankfurt, under the slogan ‘First Gaza, now Iran — What is Israel’s next goal?’…

“The gathering comes as the Council of Europe’s Commissioner for Human Rights Michael O’Flaherty expressed his concern to German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt about freedom of expression and freedom of peaceful assembly in Germany over protests related to Gaza.

“O’Flaherty noted restrictions on events, symbols, or other forms of expression in this context in Germany, but also cited reports of police using excessive force against demonstrators, including minors.”

Compact Ban Unconstitutional

Focus wrote on June 24:

“Almost a year ago, then-Federal Minister of the Interior Nancy Faeser banned [the] ‘Compact’ magazine… Shortly thereafter, in August, the highest administrative judges in Leipzig provisionally suspended the ban in expedited proceedings [so that the paper could continue publication for the time being]…

“The Federal Administrative Court in Leipzig has now lifted the ban… The Leipzig judges are responsible for lawsuits against association bans in the first and final instance… ‘The AfD will also benefit from this,’ said [‘Compact’ editor-in-chief Jürgen Elsässer] after the hearing on the ban on his right-wing extremist magazine. Elsässer said that if it was impossible to ban ‘Compact,’ it was also impossible to ban the AfD. His magazine was ‘the assault gun of democracy.’ ‘We are the strongest voice of the opposition. And you will hear more from us.’…”

Söder for Mandatory Military Service

Deutsche Welle wrote on June 23:

“Bavarian Premier Markus Söder has reaffirmed his call for the return of compulsory military service, citing growing threats to European security….

“‘I am in favor of conscription and not just a few questionnaires being sent out. We need it to defend our freedom,’ Söder said Monday on German broadcaster ZDF.”

Majority of Germans Favor Independent European Nuclear Deterrent

Deutsche Welle wrote on June 23:

“Almost two-thirds of Germans are in favor of a European nuclear deterrent independent of the United States, according to a new poll… 64% of respondents were in favor of setting up a European nuclear shield, while 29% were opposed.

“Before taking office in May, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz had already signaled his intent to pursue discussions with the United Kingdom and France — Europe’s two nuclear powers — on developing a joint European nuclear strategy. The goal is to reduce Europe’s reliance on the US nuclear umbrella, especially amid concerns over the unpredictability of President Donald Trump.

“Support for a European deterrent was consistent across demographic and political lines — an unusual level of consensus on foreign policy in Germany. In western Germany, 66% backed the idea, compared to 52% in the east. Among respondents under 45, support was 58.5%, rising to 67.5% among those over 45.

“By party affiliation, 78% of Green Party voters supported the concept, followed by 71% of supporters of Merz’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and its Bavarian sister party, the Christian Social Union (CSU). Support also stood at 65% among Social Democratic Party (SPD) voters, 54% among Alternative for Germany (AfD) voters, and 52% among those backing The Left.

“The UK’s nuclear deterrent is operationally independent but technologically reliant on US systems. France’s version is both operationally and technologically independent…”

Defense News added on June 23:

“Simultaneously, voices here grew louder that favored a degree of European strategic autonomy. In March 2025, 69% of Germans supported European countries building a common army, up from just 49% in 2015. The poll results also show Germans willing to spend substantially on defense, with 75% supporting increased EU member state military spending.”

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News

What Matters Now For Israel

The Telegraph wrote on June 13:

“Now all that matters is how much damage Israel can inflict on three vital plants at the core of Iran’s nuclear industry – Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan. The first two are where Iran enriches uranium…  In Isfahan, raw uranium is converted into gas prior to being fed into centrifuges for enrichment… So far, Israel appears to have struck Natanz but not Isfahan or Fordow.

“The latter is by far the toughest target – an enrichment facility dug into a mountain, beneath hundreds of feet of rock and earth, where centrifuges are already producing uranium at 60 per cent purity, barely a hair’s breadth from weapons grade… The great risk for Mr Netanyahu is that when the smoke clears and Operation Rising Lion, the codename of this campaign, is over, Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan will be reparable in a matter of months or even weeks.

“If so, he will have achieved nothing but a short delay in Iran’s path to a nuclear weapon. And you can be sure that Iran’s leaders – if they are still in power when this ends – will immediately dash for a bomb…”

Reuters wrote on June 13:

“… satellite imagery did not yet show significant damage to nuclear infrastructure, several experts said. ‘The first day was aimed at things that you would get through surprise – killing leadership, going after nuclear scientists, air defense systems, the ability to retaliate,’ said nuclear expert David Albright at the Institute for Science and International Security. ‘We can’t see any visible damage at Fordow or Isfahan. There was damage at Natanz,’ said Albright, referring to Iranian nuclear sites. But ‘there’s no evidence that the underground site was destroyed.’…

“‘It has always been the conventional wisdom that Israel may not have the ordnance to destroy Fordow without American military support,’ Mark Dubowitz, head of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies think tank, told a podcast. The United States is better equipped than Israel to destroy such targets with its most powerful bunker buster bombs, the 30,000-pound (14,000 kg) Massive Ordnance Penetrator.

“If Iran decides not to negotiate a nuclear deal, the U.S. could use its B2 bombers and those bombs to destroy Fordow, Dubowitz said….”

Israel will receive a [military] “wound” before the beginning of the Great Tribulation. 

Trump Warns Iran 

Breitbart wrote on June 13: 

“President Trump related that ‘I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal. I told them, in the strongest of words, to “just do it”’, but said they ‘just couldn’t get it done’. This is a serious matter, the President said, because ‘the United States makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, [by far], and that Israel has a lot of it, with much more to come’

“Iranian hardliners had been brave in negotiations but they are ‘all [dead] now, and it will only get worse’, he said… ‘Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left… [Just do it, before it is too late]’, he wrote…” 

Trump Claims He Knew Everything! 

The New York Post wrote on June 13:

“President Trump told The Post Friday that he knew Israel would strike Iran if the theocratic regime didn’t quickly agree to a revised nuclear deal with the US. ‘I always knew the date,’ the president said in a brief phone interview. ‘Because I know everything. I know everything. I know everything. I gave them 60 days and they didn’t meet it,’ Trump went on. ‘Today’s 61, you know. Today’s day 61.’… 

“The first sign that a significant operation was afoot came Wednesday, when non-essential US personnel were told to leave several outposts in the region…” 

Trump’s and Pakistan’s Threats 

The Sun wrote on June 17: 

“Trump is reportedly considering joining Israel in striking Iranian nuclear sites hours after he said the Ayatollah is an ‘easy target.’ Trump claimed the US and Israel know exactly where Iran’s Supreme Leader is hiding out but he won’t order any assassination plot ‘for now’… 

“[Trump] is now said to be considering allowing for a US strike on Iran, according to multiple current and former administration officials… 

“Tension across the Middle East is now skyrocketing as the conflict threatens to spiral into a wider regional war after Pakistan called for the Islamic world to back Iran. Islamabad even warned they will nuke Israel, a senior Iranian general claimed.” 

Daily Mail wrote on June 17: 

“Israel has said it is ‘on the verge’ of destroying ‘more than 10 nuclear targets’ in Iran’ – amid fears that strikes on the sites could trigger a radiation incident… Trump last night refused to sign a joint statement with fellow G7 leaders calling for de-escalation in the conflict before storming out of the summit, saying he had to get back to Washington early ‘for obvious reasons’. 

“Speaking from Air Force One, he then furiously denied claims made by French President Emmanuel Macron that he was heading back to work on a ceasefire… He warned that the US will join Israel’s war and ‘come down hard’ on Tehran if provoked, adding that if Tehran ‘touches’ US troops, ‘the gloves are off’.” 

Tehran to Evacuate 

The New York Post wrote on June 16:

“President Trump warned that ‘everyone’ in Tehran should ‘immediately evacuate’ in an alarming Monday night Truth Social post as it was revealed he would be leaving the G7 summit a day early due to the Iran-Israel conflict… The president’s evacuation warning came after Israeli officials called for those in Tehran to evacuate earlier Monday ahead of its continued military campaign against Iran, which has included slews of missile exchanges between the conflicting countries. 

“The evacuation area includes an estimated 330,000 people in central Tehran, including Iran’s state television headquarters, police headquarters and three key hospitals including one owned by the country’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard… thousands have been pushed to flee, the chaos only exacerbated by Tehran’s lack of publicly accessible bomb shelters. A majority of the 9.5 million people in Iran’s capital have been left in limbo as mass evacuations clogged traffic while others lack the means to leave at all… Earlier that same day, Trump told ABC News that it is ‘possible’ the US could get involved in the conflict… As of Monday, an estimated 224 people were killed during the attacks in Iran. In Israel, 24 deaths have been confirmed…”

 Reportedly, tens of thousands of Americans are living in Tehran, with no realistic possibility of evacuation. 

Tucker Carlson Attacks Trump 

The Independent wrote on June 13: 

“Tucker Carlson has turned on President Donald Trump by accusing him of being ‘complicit’ in Israel’s attacks on Iran.  The former Fox News host and MAGA figurehead rebuked Trump and the administration in his newsletter: ‘… While the American military may not have physically perpetrated the assault, years of funding and sending weapons to Israel, which Donald Trump just bragged about on Truth Social, undeniably place the U.S. at the center of last night’s events….’ 

“The conflict is already splitting MAGA down the middle, leading figures of the movement have said publicly. ‘A direct strike on Iran right now would disastrously split the Trump coalition,’ podcaster Jack Posobiec wrote on X… He added that it could cost the Republicans the midterms. 

“If Trump gave Israel the ‘green light’ to target Iran, it ‘would be seen as an unforgivable betrayal by millions of American voters,’ Mollie Hemingway, the editor of right-wing publication The Federalist, said in a post on X… Iran has since retaliated by firing missiles at Israel, which the U.S. is supporting to intercept…” 

MAGA in Disarray? 

The Daily Mail wrote on June 15: 

“Donald Trump is teetering on the brink of an all-out Iran crisis amid MAGA fury over his ‘complicity’ in Israel’s strikes. In a sensational development Sunday, two US officials revealed that the president vetoed an Israeli plan this week to kill Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei… The president is now facing calls from Iran hawks in the GOP to join Israel’s bombing campaign… It comes as Trump this morning refused to rule out involvement in the conflict, while at the same time denying any American participation to this point… 

“The intra-MAGA split on foreign policy appears to be far-reaching, even extending as far at the leadership at the Pentagon itself…”

On June 16, Netanyahu said during a TV interview with ABC that assassinating Ali Khamenei would “end the conflict” between the two nations, thereby not ruling out “killing Iran’s supreme leader” (The New York Post, dated June 16). 

Tucker Carlson Attacks “Warmongers” 

Newsmax wrote on June 15: 

“Carlson targeted conservative media figures and donors, labeling them ‘warmongers’ for advocating U.S. military involvement… [listing] specifically Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Rupert Murdoch [and others]… 

“U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee also weighed in, saying Israel’s security remains in America’s national interest. ‘Seven hundred thousand Americans live in Israel,’ Huckabee wrote to supporters… 

“Carlson argued Trump had campaigned against regime change in Iran. He also argued that a war with Iran could be challenging… ‘An attack on Iran could very easily become a world war. We’d lose.’ 

“Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Wednesday that abandoning uranium enrichment was ‘100%’ against the country’s interests, rejecting a central U.S. demand in talks to resolve a decadeslong dispute over Tehran’s nuclear ambitions… Iranian leaders have long claimed that if they acquired nuclear weapons they would ‘wipe Israel off the map.’” 

Carlson has been a strong Trump supporter. But so have been Hannity and Levin. Trump praised them all in the past. Now what? 

Israel’s surprise attack killed at least 20 senior Iranian commanders, sources said, including the head of its Revolutionary Guard. At least six nuclear scientists have also been confirmed killed in the strikes. 

End of American Empire? 

Mediaite wrote on June 16: 

“Tucker Carlson warned Monday that U.S. involvement in the escalating Israel-Iran conflict could bring down President Donald Trump and mark the collapse of America’s global influence… ‘I’m really afraid that my country’s gonna be further weakened by this. I think we’re gonna see the end of the American empire… But it’s also going to end, I believe, Trump’s presidency and effectively end it.’

“… Carlson expressed doubt about U.S. military readiness and warned of overreach… ‘We don’t even have a good track record… Why are the Houthis still there?… How prepared is the U.S. military for a real conflict? The answer is totally unprepared. Scary unprepared. I don’t think people understand that.’” 

MAGA War Intensifies 

The Hill wrote on June 17:

“The ideological battle over what ‘America First’ means in the Trump era is intensifying in wake of Israel’s strikes on Iran, splitting the MAGA right and testing its relationships with the president. On one side, noninterventionist doves insist the Trumpian tagline means the president must avoid U.S. troops, resources or dollars going toward the conflict, for fear of getting dragged into an endless war. ‘Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA,’ Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) posted Sunday on…  X.  

“But on the other end, foreign policy hawks and supporters of Israel are appealing to President Trump’s position that Iran should not have a nuclear weapon, and encouraging him to leave all options — including direct military intervention — on the table… 

“Trump beat back the dove side somewhat in another post calling Carlson ‘kooky’ — prompting Greene, who almost never criticizes the president, to make the stunning move to come to Carlson’s defense. ‘Foreign wars/intervention/regime change put America last, kill innocent people, are making us broke, and will ultimately lead to our destruction. That’s not kooky. That’s what millions of Americans voted for,’ Greene said.” 

In a heated interview with Senator Ted Cruz, exposing the massive fault line ripping through the MAGA world, Carlson accused Cruz of not knowing anything about Iran which he wants to “topple.” 

The Reaction of the Arab World 

Aljazeera wrote on June 13: 

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani condemned Israel’s ‘military aggression’ against Iran, saying that the wave of air strikes violated international law and threatened global security… Oman, which has been mediating nuclear talks between the US and Iran over recent months, decried Israel’s attacks as a ‘dangerous and reckless escalation’ that ‘violates the principles of international law’… 

Ankara issued a sharp condemnation of Israel’s attack, calling it a violation of international law and a reckless provocation… Saudi Arabia denounced the ‘heinous’ Israeli attacks… Qatar said it was deeply concerned over the ‘dangerous escalation’ and called on the international community to ‘urgently halt these Israeli violations’… The UAE condemned the Israeli attacks and called for restraint… ‘Jordan has not and will not allow any violation of its airspace, reaffirming that the Kingdom will not be a battleground for any conflict,’ a government spokesperson told AFP after Jordan closed its airspace following Israel’s attack on Iran… 

“The Lebanese foreign ministry condemned Israel’s attack on Iran…” 

The nations mentioned in Psalm 83 are coming together in their hatred against “Israel.” And while the German government (CDU and SPD) is honoring Israel’s right to self-defense, the AfD and the left-wing parties strongly condemned Israel’s actions.   

The Israeli Foreign Ministry said it would close all consulates and embassies worldwide.

Turkey to Be Part of Europe’s Defense System 

Arab News wrote on June 13:

“Turkiye has long insisted on being a part of Europe’s defense programs and having a say in how Europe shapes its security. Yet, for decades, European states viewed Turkiye mostly through the lens of its EU membership bid and political disagreements. But today, geopolitical matters — especially growing security threats — are shifting that perspective. Now, both Ankara and Brussels recognize that they face similar security concerns….

“A few years ago, the idea of integrating Turkish defense companies into Europe’s security systems might have seemed unrealistic. But several factors have changed that. Turkiye’s falling-out with the US over the F-35 program, increasing regional threats, Russia’s aggression in Ukraine and Europe’s doubts about long-term US security commitments have all helped bring Ankara and the EU closer together and make EU-Turkiye defense cooperation more appealing. The combination of these factors has created a major shift in their relationship, which is now reflected in more regular meetings between Turkish and European defense officials.” 

Even though it is not to be expected that Turkey will join the EU, a collaboration between the EU and Turkey is prophesied… 

Rand Paul Criticizes Saturday’s Military Parade 

Mediaite wrote on June 15: 

“Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) — who has clashed heavily with President Donald Trump in recent days by speaking out against the Trump-backed budget bill — condemned Saturday’s military parade  in Washington, comparing it to similar marches in the Soviet Union and North Korea

“‘I just never liked the idea of the parade because I grew up in the ’70s and ’80s and the only parades I can remember are Soviet parades for the most part or North Korean parades,’ Paul said. ‘And the parades I remember from our history were different… we were rejoicing the end of war, and we were rejoicing our soldiers coming home… But we never glorified weapons so much.’ 

“[He] added that he also objected on the basis of the parade’s reported price tag of more than $40 million… ‘I mean, we’re $2 trillion in the hole and just, an additional cost like this, I’m not for it.’” 

Paul certainly has a point. According to the Hill, dated June 14, “Six in 10 adults in a nationwide AP-NORC poll conducted between June 5 and June 9 said that the parade was not a good use of government funds. However, 40 percent of people approved of Trump’s decision to hold a parade… Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said he wouldn’t have held the parade. ‘We’re a lion, and a lion doesn’t have to tell you it’s a lion,’ Kennedy said on Tuesday. ‘I would save the money, but if the president wants to have a parade, he’s the president, and I’m not.’” 

Nationwide Anti-Trump Demonstrations and Protests 

The Guardian wrote on June 14: 

“As tanks and soldiers paraded through the streets of Washington on Saturday, several million people around the country [the estimate is up to 6 million] turned out to protest against the excesses of Donald Trump’s administration.  The protests, dubbed ‘No Kings’, took place at about 2,100 sites nationwide, from big cities to small towns. A coalition of more than 100 groups joined together to plan the protests…” 

The Associated Press reported on June 15: 

Atlanta’s 5,000-capacity event quickly reached its limit, with thousands more gathered outside barriers to hear speakers in front of the state Capitol. Officials in Seattle estimated that more than 70,000 people attended the city’s largest rally downtown, the Seattle Times reported….” 

Newsweek wrote on June 15: “Police estimate the crowd at the ‘No Kings’ protest in Chicago was ~15,000 deep…” 

CBS News wrote on June 15: “An estimated tens of thousands joined the ‘No Kings’ demonstrations throughout Portland, Oregon…” 

USA Today wrote on June 15: “50,000 people showed up in New York City…” According to the Guardian of June 15, “more than 200,000 in New York and over 100,000 in Philadelphia [showed up]… The protests were largely peaceful, though some – in Los Angeles and Portland – were later deemed unlawful assembly by law enforcement…” 

The Los Angeles Daily News wrote on June 15: “Around 4 p.m., the downtown LA rally – with an estimated 200,000 protesters – switched from peaceful to chaotic, as some people reportedly threw rocks, bottles and fireworks at police. Officers issued a dispersal order and unleashed a multitude of flash-bang grenades, rubber bullets and tear gas canisters at the crowd. Confusion broke out as police on horseback pushed people away from various areas and traffic had to be diverted…”

America Divided 

NPR wrote on June 16: 

“The 33-mile trip from one protest in Annapolis to the parade grandstand in front of the White House was like a journey between two different countries… 

“America’s split-screen day had finally merged into a collective image of a divided people a half block from the White House, many unable or unwilling to talk to one another…” 

Trump’s Vengeance? 

The Guardian wrote on June 16: 

“Trump has promised an expanded immigration crackdown in several large Democratic-led cities as apparent vengeance for ‘No Kings’ protests against his administration on Saturday that drew millions of people… 

“Trump’s stance on immigration has fluctuated wildly in recent days. Last week, his administration ordered Ice to stop workplace immigration enforcement actions unless related to criminal investigations, in the face of growing public backlash to raids perceived to harm industries with a significant proportion of immigrant labor, such as farming and tourism… 

“Sunday’s post, however, appeared to reverse his position again. His choice to identify only Democratic-run cities with large immigrant populations, and omit others controlled by, or leaning Republican, was notable.” 

Also, “Trump told ICE staff to ‘do all in their power’ to detain and deport undocumented immigrants in Los Angeles, Chicago and New York” (The Daily Beast, dated June 15). 

None of this will lead to peace in the USA.

Trump Flip-Flops Again, While Listening to Bad Advice 

The Daily Beast wrote on June 17:

“White House Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem… were enraged after learning that Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins had called Trump and suggested that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents avoid deporting longtime workers in sectors heavily reliant on migrant labor… Rollins’ intervention… appeared to sway the president. 

“Last week, Trump floated the idea of carving out exemptions from his mass deportation plans specifically to avoid targeting non-criminal workers on farms and in hotels. An official policy shift followed soon after. Senior ICE official Tatum King informed regional ICE offices Thursday that ‘investigations/operations on agriculture (including aquaculture and meatpacking plants), restaurants, and operating hotels’ would be paused… 

“Miller, Noem and other hardline anti-immigration officials then sought to change the policy back to where it was before Rollins got in Trump’s ear… That pressure campaign seemed to work… By Monday, the Department of Homeland Security reversed course, notifying staff that the previous guidelines were scrapped and that ICE would resume raids on agricultural businesses, hotels, and restaurants.” 

The New York Post added on June 17: 

“The Trump administration is backing away from its earlier instructions to halt immigration raids at farms, hotels and restaurants, according to reports… President Trump posted on Truth Social Thursday that his mass deportation campaign was taking its toll on the agricultural and hospitality industries… ‘Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,’ Trump wrote. ‘This is not good. We must protect our Farmers…,’ he said… 

“All the while, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has further pushed ICE to meet the 3,000 daily arrest quota the administration has set…”

In an interview on Wednesday, June 18, Trump said that before considering the farmers and hotel and restaurant owners, ICE had to get rid of the criminals first, defining them, again, as those coming from prisons and mental institutions. The truth is, the raids are clearly not limited to or even mainly directed towards those people. 

And what a ridiculous quota! So, that America’s economy, American farmers, hotel and restaurant owners and others are hurting does not seem to be of any concern to the Trump Administration. Shameful! 

Dramatic Confrontations and Federal Overreach 

NBC News wrote on June 17: 

“New York City Comptroller Brad Lander was released Tuesday hours after he was arrested in connection with an episode at a federal courthouse in the city, where he and his wife were serving as advocates for defendants in immigration courts, they said.

“The Department of Homeland Security said Lander, a candidate for mayor, had been arrested and accused of ‘assaulting law enforcement and impeding a federal officer.’…  After he was released, Lander denied assaulting law enforcement… ‘We are not going to allow Donald Trump to wreck the rule of law, to deny people due process and to turn our country into something that doesn’t meet its obligations under international law,’ Lander said… 

“New York Gov. Kathy Hochul accompanied him as he was released and told reporters that ‘to my knowledge’ any charges had been dropped… Hochul also called Lander’s arrest ‘total bull—’ on X.  ‘When elected officials are being detained without cause, we have to ask: what the hell is happening to our country?’… 

“Kat Capossela, Lander’s campaign press secretary, said in an email earlier in the day that ‘Brad was taken by masked agents and detained by ICE,’ a reference to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, after ‘escorting a defendant out of immigration court’… Lander [said] that after he was handcuffed, federal agents escorted him to a detention room. ‘They took the cuffs off, and I just sat for 3½ hours in a detention room,’ Lander said, adding that he was not released until Hochul showed up… 

“The incident is the latest in a series of dramatic confrontations between immigration officials and Democrats opposing President Donald Trump’s immigration policies. Last week, Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., was forcibly removed from a news conference with Homeland Security Secretary Kristin Noem. Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, who was then a candidate for governor of New Jersey, was also arrested on trespassing charges last month at an ICE detention facility in the state. The charges were dropped, but Democratic Rep. LaMonica McIver was subsequently charged with assaulting law enforcement during the incident. Trump and his ‘border czar,’ Tom Homan, also suggested that California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass could be arrested, too.  [Trump even said, if he was Homan, he would arrest Newsom.] 

“The Democratic officials and their allies have argued that the incidents were politically motivated and have criticized the administration’s conduct, while the Trump administration has fiercely defended immigration agents and accused Democrats of staging political stunts. 

“Lander can be seen in a video on his personal X account being surrounded by people, including masked officers in vests labeled with the word ‘police.’ At one point, someone says, ‘Put him in custody,’ and the men holding him scuffle with him before they pin him to a wall and handcuff him. ‘I’m not obstructing. I’m standing right here in the hallway. I asked to see the judicial warrant,’ Lander says in the video. ‘You don’t have the authority to arrest U.S. citizens asking for a judicial warrant,’ he adds. 

“Lander’s wife, Meg Barnette [a former attorney], criticized the Trump administration’s handling of cases involving immigrants at a news conference shortly after her husband’s arrest. She also echoed Democratic criticisms of the administration’s immigration policies, arguing that judges were dismissing charges against defendants before the defendants were turned over to federal agents to begin the deportation process…” 

The New York Times added on June 18: 

“With tensions rising over President Trump’s mass deportation policies, the government crackdown is extending to the political opposition… The scenes of chaos reflect the tinderbox nature of this political moment… 

“In recent weeks, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers have also aggressively thought to detain migrants at immigration courts, leading to emotional scenes as masked agents make surprise arrests of people who thought they were attending routine hearings

“Last week, Senator Alex Padilla, Democrat of California, was forcibly removed from a news conference being held by Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, and handcuffed despite identifying himself as a senator… ‘Like me, Mr. Lander had the audacity to question the legitimacy of federal actions, only to find himself handcuffed, pushed against a wall and detained,’ Mr. Padilla said in a statement. ‘If it happened to us in full view of the public, imagine what is happening in communities across the country when the cameras are off. This should be a wake-up call to the country.’” 

Violence and perceived authoritarian federal actions are continuing in the USA… 

Innocent Protestor Killed in Utah 

Newsmax wrote on June 15: 

“A demonstrator was shot and killed at Salt Lake City’s ‘No Kings’ protest when a man believed to be part of the event’s peacekeeping team fired at another man allegedly aiming a rifle at protestors, authorities said Sunday. Police took the alleged rifleman, Arturo Gamboa, 24, into custody Saturday evening on a murder charge… The bystander, Arthur Folasa Ah Loo, 39, died at the hospital. 

“Detectives don’t yet know why Gamboa pulled out a rifle or ran from the peacekeepers, but they accused him of creating the dangerous situation that led to Ah Loo’s death… 

“[Police Chief Brian] Redd said a man dressed in a brightly colored vest fired three shots from a handgun at Gamboa, inflicting a relatively minor injury but fatally shooting Ah Loo. The gunshots sent hundreds of protestors running, some hiding behind barriers and fleeing into parking garages and nearby businesses, police said in a statement.” 

Trump’s Actions Illegal

The Ron Paul Institute republished the following article by Judge Andrew P. Napolitano on June 14: 

“The deployment of California National Guard troops and active-duty U.S. Marines onto the streets of Los Angeles is an assault on federalism, violates federal law and manifests a dangerous pattern of governmental behavior in defiance of constitutional principles and the rule of law… President Donald Trump, against the express wishes of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, federalized the CA National Guard, became their commander in chief, and ordered them to thwart both lawful and unlawful demonstrators in Los Angeles. 

“There, agents of the U.S. Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) were attempting to make warrantless arrests of persons whom they and their colleagues believed were unlawfully present in the U.S. Demonstrators soon arrived, some of whom peaceably assembled and vociferously objected to the arrests, and some of whom attempted to interfere with them violently. Clearly, acts of physical interference with even unlawful arrests are themselves unlawful, but condemning government behavior, waving Mexican flags, cheering on those who have been arrested, even standing in the way of federal agents until ordered to move are all protected acts of expression and historically recognized acts of civil disobedience… 

“Then the president ordered in the federalized National Guard and then — almost unimaginably — he ordered in active-duty Marines. The sight of active-duty armed troops confronting unarmed persons exercising their constitutionally protected freedom of expression, and the declaration of no free speech zones, was and is gut wrenching, un-American and without lawful precedent in modern times… 

“Can National Guard troops be used for law enforcement?… Congress addressed this in numerous federal statutes, enacted in 1792, 1794, 1795 and again in 1807. The essence of these laws permits the president to declare himself the commander in chief of the National Guard for law enforcement purposes only when asked by a state governor. Short of the gubernatorial request, the Guard may not be summoned by the president for law enforcement purposes, except in the cases of invasion or rebellion… since there is no invasion or rebellion as the laws define them, there is no lawful basis for all these troops on the streets. 

“This is not constitutional hairsplitting. This is very serious business. If the feds can characterize an unarmed assemblage of protesters as an invasion merely because they are angry, carry a foreign flag and prefer a foreign language — all protected speech — and engage in civil disobedience, and thus justify the use of military force against them, whose freedoms are safe? 

“The government argues that the current state of affairs in Los Angeles constitutes an emergency and thus it has broad powers to address it. That is constitutional hogwash…” 

More Countries to Be Added to Travel Ban List? 

The Washington Post wrote on June 14: 

“The United States is considering restricting entry to citizens of an additional 36 countries in what would be a significant expansion of the travel ban announced by the Trump administration early this month, according to a State Department memo reviewed by The Washington Post. Among the new list of countries that could face visa bans or other restrictions are 25 African nations, including significant U.S. partners such as Egypt and Djibouti, plus countries in the CaribbeanCentral Asia and several Pacific Island nations… 

“The memo, which was signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and sent Saturday to U.S. diplomats who work with the countries, said the governments of listed nations were being given 60 days to meet new benchmarks and requirements established by the State Department. It set a deadline of 8 a.m. Wednesday for them to provide an initial action plan for meeting the requirements. 

“The memo identified varied benchmarks that, in the administration’s estimation, these countries were failing to meet. Some countries had ‘no competent or cooperative central government authority to produce reliable identity documents or other civil documents,’ or they suffered from ‘widespread government fraud.’ Others had large numbers of citizens who overstayed their visas in the United States, the memo said. 

“Other reasons included the availability of citizenship by monetary investment without a requirement of residency and claims of ‘antisemitic and anti-American activity in the United States’ by people from those countries… 

“The countries facing scrutiny in the memo: Angola; Antigua and Barbuda; Benin; Bhutan; Burkina Faso; Cabo Verde; Cambodia; Cameroon; Democratic Republic of Congo; Djibouti; Dominica; Ethiopia; Egypt; Gabon; Gambia; Ghana; Ivory Coast; Kyrgyzstan; Liberia; Malawi; Mauritania; Niger; Nigeria; Saint Kitts and Nevis; Saint Lucia; Sao Tome and Principe; Senegal; South Sudan; Syria; Tanzania; Tonga; Tuvalu; Uganda; Vanuatu; Zambia; and Zimbabwe. 

“The list represents a significant expansion of a presidential proclamation issued June 4, when the United States fully restricted the entry of individuals from Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The United States also had partially restricted the entry of travelers from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela under that order…” 

Pretty soon, if this trend continues, America will become a “sealed castle” with no ability to enter for most. And many have no desire to visit Trump’s America anyhow. Note the next article. 

Avoiding the USA? 

The Associated Press wrote on June 16: 

“The world may be rethinking the American dream. For centuries, people in other countries saw the United States as place of welcome and opportunity. Now, President Donald Trump’s drive for mass deportations of migrants is riling the streets of Los Angeles, college campuses, even churches — and fueling a global rethinking about the virtues and promise of coming to America… Early clues across industries — like tourism, trade, entertainment and education — suggest the American dream is fading for foreigners who have historically flooded to the U.S… 

“Trump and many of his supporters maintain that migrants in the country illegally threaten American safety, jobs and culture. But people in the country legally also have been caught in Trump’s dragnet. 

“… the United States has always been a nation of immigrants… Everyone, after all, comes from somewhere — a fact underscored on-camera in the Oval Office this month when German Chancellor Friedrich Merz gave the president the framed birth certificate of Trump’s grandfather, also named Friedrich, who emigrated from Germany in 1885. He was one of millions of Germans who fled war and economic strife to move to the United States in the late 19th Century… 

“Trump himself has married two immigrant women: the late Ivana Zelníčková Trump, of what’s now the Czech Republic, and his current wife, Melania Knauss Trump of Slovenia…” 

Trump’s Weird Comments 

Mediaite wrote on June 13: 

“President Donald Trump went on a strange rant about World War II when he was asked about his upcoming military parade, revealing a phone conversation in which he and Russian President Vladimir Putin humorously riffed about everyone ‘hating Russia’ but loving Germany and Japan now.

“Trump has a long history of oddball (and worse) commentary about World War II, which reared its head recently when he made a crack about Nazi Germany during a bilateral meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz… A MAGA-friendly reporter asked him about Saturday’s parade to ostensibly celebrate the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army — which also coincides with Trump’s 79th birthday…. 

“‘Russia fought, sort of interesting, isn’t it? He [Who? Putin?] fought with us at World War II and everybody hates him [Putin?]. And Germany and Japan, they’re fine, you know… But Putin is a little confused by that. You know, he said, we lost 51 million people, and we were your ally. And now everybody hates Russia, and they love Germany and Japan.’” 

Stalin was America’s and Britain’s ally. He was as much a mass murderer as Hitler. Without this questionable alliance, the world would have been much better off. There would have been no Iron Curtain, no divided Germany, no Berlin Wall. Churchill was strongly advocating against having an alliance with Stalin whom he deeply distrusted, but he was not listened to. He even designed a contingency plan to invade Russia, called “Operation Unthinkable.” 

Madman Kills and Injures Politicians in Minnesota, Masquerading as Police Officer 

The New York Post wrote on June 14: 

“A Minnesota [Democratic] state lawmaker [and former House speaker] and her husband were killed, and another [Democratic] politician [senator] and his wife were seriously injured early Saturday in a ‘politically motivated attack’ when a madman posing as a police officer turned up at their homes and opened fire, authorities said… 

“Officers… discovered a car outfitted with flashing lights to look like an SUV squad car. ‘When they arrived at [the] house, they noticed that there was a police vehicle in the driveway with the emergency lights on and what appeared to be a police officer at the door coming out of the house,’ [Brooklyn Park Police Chief Mark] Bruley said, adding that the suspect was wearing a vest, a badge and other equipment… ‘When our officers confronted him, the individual immediately fired upon the officers who exchanged gunfire, and the suspect retreated back into the home,’ he continued….” 

A hit list was found in which the suspect listed nearly 70 names as potential targets, “mostly naming Democrats or figures with ties to abortion rights” (CNN, June 15). The suspect was subsequently arrested. 

No Trust in US Economy 

The Telegraph wrote on June 16: 

“British manufacturers snub [the] US after Trump’s trade war. Only 4 [percent] of companies would consider setting up a production facility in America… 

“The US has dropped out of the three most desirable markets for British manufacturers for the first time in decades, as Donald Trump’s trade war dents confidence in the world’s biggest economy.”. 

Japan’s Nippon Steel Takes Over US Steel 

The Financial Times wrote on June 18: 

“Japan’s Nippon Steel has closed its nearly $15bn purchase of its American rival US Steel, ending more than a year of political wrangling that threatened to scuttle the agreement on multiple occasions. US President Donald Trump approved the tie-up last week, months after his predecessor Joe Biden moved to block the deal. Nippon clinched Trump’s approval after pledging to invest $11bn in the Pennsylvania-based company by 2028, billions of dollars more than it had initially promised. It also handed the government a golden share in US Steel, which will allow the White House to veto key corporate decisions… 

“The Japanese steelmaker has committed to keeping US Steel’s headquarters in the industrial city. Nippon also said that a majority of US Steel’s board of directors will be US citizens, and so will top executives like its chief executive….” 

Still, Nippon now owns 100% of US Steel… an outcome which Trump had originally strongly opposed. 

San Diego Tops It All 

fox5sandiego wrote on June 15: 

“Food prices in San Diego County are rising noticeably, squeezing families’ wallets amid broader inflation trends. 

“San Diego topped all major cities in May when it comes to inflation, and food costs factor in…” 

AI Copyright Violations? 

NPR wrote on June 12: 

“In a first-of-its-kind lawsuit, entertainment companies Disney and Universal are suing AI firm Midjourney for copyright infringement… 

“The suit accuses Midjourney, a well-known force in the AI image generation space with around 20 million registered users… of ‘selling an artificial intelligence (‘AI’) image-generating service (‘Image Service’) that functions as a virtual vending machine, generating endless unauthorized copies of Disney’s and Universal’s copyrighted works.’ 

“The lawsuit details Midjourney’s alleged infringement of popular Disney and Universal figures, including Shrek, Homer Simpson and Darth Vader…” 

Germany’s First-Ever Veterans Day 

Deutsche Welle wrote on June 15: 

“The president of the German parliament, Julia Klöckner, officially opened the country’s first national Veterans Day on Sunday, saying it was ‘high time’ for such an occasion. ‘This day has created something which has always been lacking: public visibility, recognition and respect for all those who have served in our country’s armed forces,’ she said at an event in Berlin… Klöckner highlighted the role of the German army… as a ‘parliamentary army’ which is answerable to parliament – as opposed to an individual head of state as commander-in-chief… 

“Writing on social media, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz called the Bundeswehr a ‘key component of our society’ and said: ‘The men and women who serve, or have served, in it deserve our thanks, our recognition and our respect. This service for our country belongs in center of our society.’ 

“On Saturday, Defense Minister Boris Pistorius praised the professionalism of German troops and said that the challenges facing them will increase in years to come… ‘The threat has increased in recent years… We have to be clear: we have to be able to defend our country and our alliance if it is attacked.’” 

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News

LA Protests: Trump’s National Guard Move Sparks Legal Concerns 

Newsweek wrote on June 8: 

“Federal immigration enforcement operations sparked protests across California for a second day in a row on Saturday. [They continued on Sunday.] ICE carried out raids in Paramount, Los Angeles County, following similar actions at several locations throughout other parts of city on Friday. Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the move [to send 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles], saying that local law enforcement was already mobilized and the presence of the National Guard was ‘purposefully inflammatory,’ would ‘escalate tensions’ and ‘erode public trust.’ 

“On Saturday, the White House ordered the deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles under a provision called Title 10 to ‘temporarily protect ICE and other United States government personnel who are performing federal functions.’ The National Guard is a state-based military force that serves as both a state and federal reserve branch of the U.S. Army and Air Force.

It typically operates under state command and is funded by the state. However, in some cases, troops may be assigned to federal missions while still under state control, with funding provided by the central government. 

“The law referenced in Trump’s proclamation allows National Guard troops to be placed under federal command, and permits this under three conditions: if the U.S. is invaded or faces the threat of invasion; if there is a rebellion or imminent rebellion against federal authority; or if the president is unable to enforce federal laws using regular forces. The memorandum from the White House reads: ‘To the extent that protests or acts of violence directly inhibit the execution of the laws, they constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the government of the United States.’ 

“However, the law also stipulates that such orders should ‘be issued through the governors of the states.’ It is not immediately clear if the president can activate National Guard troops without the order of that state’s governor… The Trump administration has not invoked the Insurrection Act, according to anonymous U.S. officials who spoke to Reuters this weekend. The act of 1807 serves as the primary legal authority allowing a president to deploy the military or National Guard during times of rebellion or civil unrest. 

“… After Trump announced he was deploying National Guard troops on Saturday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said other measures could follow. Hegseth wrote on X that active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton, south of Los Angeles, were on ‘high alert’ and could also be mobilized ‘if violence continues.’” [Newsom called the potential deployment of US Marines in his state “deranged”.

BBC News added on June 8: 

“Trump’s decision to federalise the National Guard, which is normally under state control, is unusual. The military force’s website says it was brought under federal control using Title 10 of the US Code – the same law Trump used – during the Civil Rights era. 

“Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy and Johnson used the National Guard to help enforce civil rights and keep public order. The Guard was also federalised during the 1967 Detroit riot, in riots after the killing of Martin Luther King Jr in 1968, and during the New York postal strike in 1970 

“… the last time a president federalized the National Guard was during the 1992 LA riots… after four white police officers were acquitted over the videotaped beating of a black motorist [Rodney King].” 

All of this will lead to more and more legal challenges in court. 

“Frightening Actions” by the Trump Administration 

The Guardian wrote on June 8: 

US national guard troops began to deploy in downtown Los Angeles after an immigration crackdown saw police use teargas on protesters in a move that has sent shockwaves through American politics... The order… marks a stunning escalation in a broad crackdown on immigrants in the United States following raids across the country which have triggered protests… many critics have feared [something like this] might happen during his second administration amid fears that the US is sliding into authoritarianism… 

“Tom Homan, Trump’s ‘border czar’,… warned that immigration enforcement will continue ‘every day’ in Los Angeles….  ‘I don’t care if they like it or not.’… 

“During afternoon protests at a downtown federal detention facility on Friday, David Huerta, the president of the California branch of the Service Employees International Union, was arrested. Huerta, who was injured and detained, released a statement to the Los Angeles Times from the hospital, saying, ‘Hard-working people, and members of our family and our community, are being treated like criminals. We all collectively have to object to this madness because this is not justice,’ he added.” 

Huerta Charged… For What? 

The Associated Press reported on June 9: 

”Federal prosecutors have charged California [SEIU] union leader David Jose Huerta with conspiring to impede an officer… In a court affidavit, a homeland security agent wrote that a ‘law enforcement officer approached Huerta and told him to leave, then put his hands on Huerta to move him out of the way of a vehicle’… The agent said Huerta pushed back and the officer pushed Huerta to the ground and arrested him. 

“The SEIU has planned a rally in Los Angeles for Monday. ‘We demand David Huerta’s immediate release and an end to these abusive workplace raids,’ April Verrett, SEIU’s international president, said in a statement.” 

It’s getting more and more ridiculous… 

Deutsche Welle wrote on June 8: 

“Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law, told the Los Angeles Times that by overriding Newsom’s authority, Trump ‘is using the military domestically to stop dissent.’ 

“‘It certainly sends a message as to how this administration is going to respond to protests. It is very frightening to see this done,’ he added.” 

Violence and Mayhem 

Daily Mail wrote on June 8: 

“The Los Angeles Police Department warned rioters on Saturday night that the use of non-lethal munitions has been authorized… The threats to use force came as activists set cars on fire and threw rocks and flaming projectiles at the authorities…. On Saturday, amid chants for ICE agents to get out, some protestors waved Mexican flags while others set a US flag on fire

Cement blocks and overturned shopping carts from Home Depot served as crude roadblocks… Smoke rose from burning shrubbery and refuse in the street, and demonstrators kicked at a Border Patrol vehicle.” 

The New York Post wrote on June 8: 

“Dramatic footage of a masked protester on a dirt bike waving a Mexican flag as he performs donuts around a blazing car in Los Angeles has become a symbol of the anti-ICE riots in the city.

The drone footage of the masked protester went viral after it was shared on X — and many observers say it gives President Trump a propaganda coup as he works to round up and deport migrants from LA and other sanctuary cities. 

“Further pictures from demonstrations show protestors waving the flags of Palestine, and one demonstrator stands on top of a blazing car with a flag from the impoverished African nation of Burkina Faso… ‘This is like the perfect propaganda footage for Trump and Steven Miller. Why do people do this?’ Australian political observer Drew Pavlou [wrote]…” 

Social media is speculating, without evidence, that all of this has been staged by Trump. But it is a known fact that many times, peaceful demonstrations are being infiltrated by violent elements. That is why Christians should stay away from those demonstrations.

Newsom Is Threatened With Arrest 

NBC News wrote on June 8: 

“Tom Homan, Trump’s appointed border czar,… warned that the governor and L.A.’s mayor could be arrested… 

“The Trump administration appointee has previously stated that efforts to impede ICE operations could result in arrest. He said that neither Newsom nor Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, both Democrats whom he accused of creating ‘a sanctuary for criminals,’ were exempt from that prospect. ‘I’ll say about anybody,’ Homan said. ‘It’s a felony to knowingly harbor and conceal an illegal alien. It’s a felony to impede law enforcement from doing their job.’” 

This might be an idle threat, but if it were to be carried out, more violent protests would be the consequence. 

Technically, Homan’s statements regarding the law may be correct, even though this is clearly a controversial statute. What makes Homan’s statements troublesome is the fact that he declared earlier that only aliens with criminal convictions would be the subject of the deportation policy, and that there might just be a little bit of “collateral damage.” This was quite clearly not true as many aliens being arrested are those who are undocumented or who have overstayed their visa, without having committed any crime beyond being here illegally. The anger in the USA is growing. 

Newsom Responds to Homan 

The New York Post wrote on June 9: 

“California Gov. Gavin Newsom added fuel to the fire after daring President Trump’s border czar Tom Homan to arrest him for failing to crack down on violent anti-ICE agitators in his state. ‘Come after me. Arrest me. Let’s just get it over with, tough guy,’ the defiant Democrat told NBC News on Sunday… 

“‘But you know what? Let your hands off 4-year-old girls that are trying to get educated. Let your hands off these poor people. They’re just trying to live their lives, man. Trying to live their lives, paying their taxes. Been here for 10 years. The fear, the horror… These guys need to grow up. They need to stop, and we need to push back. And I’m sorry to be so clear, but that kind of bloviating is exhausting. So, Tom, arrest me. Let’s go,’ he added.” 

Newsom will become more and more popular among Democrats. His assumed goal is to run for the Presidency in 2028.

California Sues Trump 

Deutsche Welle wrote on June 9: 

“California Governor Gavin Newsom said California will sue the Trump administration over its deployment of the National Guard to quell Los Angeles protests. Newsom told MSNBC that the lawsuit would challenge the president’s move to authorize federal troops without the state’s consent

“‘Donald Trump has created the conditions you see on your TV tonight. He’s exacerbated the conditions. He’s, you know, lit the proverbial match. He’s putting fuel on this fire, ever since he announced he was taking over the National Guard — an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act,’ Newsom said…” 

Judge: Trump’s Action Illegal

Threadreader wrote on June 12:

“Judge Breyer orders Trump to return control of the National Guard back to California, saying the call-up was illegal… Breyer stays his order until noon tomorrow, which should be enough time for Trump to seek emergency appeal at 9th Circuit and perhaps Supreme Court.”

The judge granted Newsom a temporary restraining order and enjoined Trump from deploying members of the California National Guard in Los Angeles.

Glendale Ends ICE Detention Contract 

Deutsche Welle wrote on June 9:

“The City of Glendale in Los Angeles County has canceled a contract that allowed Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to house detainees in its local jail… ICE’s agreement with Glendale has been in place since 2007. 

“Even before the recent anti-ICE protests, the city faced criticism from community members and activists who argued that the collaboration violated California’s sanctuary laws. California is a sanctuary state, meaning state and local law enforcement agencies are barred from assisting federal civil immigration officers.” 

“What You Need to Know About the Riots in Los Angeles” 

Bild Online wrote on June 10: 

“… at Trump’s direction, the US Department of Defense mobilized 2,000 additional National Guard troops for deployment in the West Coast metropolis—and 700 Marines from the regular armed forces. Trump had already mobilized 2,000 National Guard troops over the weekend in a highly unusual and controversial move. So, a total of 4,000!… 

“Downtown L.A. is a war zone: anarchy, looting, vandalism. US flags are being set on fire. ‘Death to America’ is being sprayed on walls. At the same time, the political feud between Trump and Gavin Newsom is escalating… 

“The beginning of the US federal authorities’ deportation offensive was associated by many with a dramatic moment: A white van drove into the parking lot of a Home Depot store in Los Angeles. Suddenly, someone in a group of day laborers shouted, ‘La Migra!’ – ‘Immigration and Customs Enforcement!’ Masked agents from the ICE deportation agency jumped out of the vehicle, and people fled in all directions. According to eyewitness accounts, the officers ‘attacked whoever they could catch’… These and similar raids were interpreted as the prelude to a large-scale deportation offensive by the federal authorities. The outrage spread like wildfire, especially in Los Angeles County – home to the largest Hispanic community in the USA. About 50 percent of the population there is Latino, and around 10 percent live without papers… 

“Donald Trump’s ‘border czar,’ deportation commissioner Tom Homan (63), however, disagrees: The raids are said to have taken place as part of the investigation into gang violence. ‘These were not migrant raids,’ he said on MSNBC. According to the federal agency, those arrested were illegal immigrants convicted of, among other things, violence against children, manslaughter, or sexual abuse… 

“At first, it was migrants and activists, encouraged by local politicians, who wanted to blame Trump for the chaos. However, extremists from progressive groups quickly joined in – Israel haters with Palestinian flags, ‘Black Lives Matter’ agitators, and especially ‘Antifa’ rioters. Antifa, as so often, forms the core of violent perpetrators: They wear black, paramilitary outfits and have tools for breaking out concrete blocks as projectiles… NGOs, especially the ‘Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles’ (CHIRLA), have also been criticized… 

“Newsom and L.A. Mayor Karen Bass (71) assert that local security forces can restore calm: But the LAPD is dramatically understaffed with just 8,620 police officers – with the riots at multiple hotspots, there is a lack of police everywhere.” 

KTLA wrote on June 8: 

“Protests over President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown and the deployment of the National Guard boiled over on the streets of Los Angeles on Sunday as demonstrators blocked the 101 Freeway and surface streets, set cars ablaze, and lobbed projectiles at law enforcement… throwing concrete, bottles and other objects… Later in the evening, CHP officers on the 101 Freeway came under assault from rocks, fireworks and other objects thrown by agitators on a bridge.”  

And the Raids and Protests Will Go On… 

The New York Post wrote on June 11: 

“ICE tactical units are gearing up to conduct raids in five Democrat-led areas… The tactical units are set to deploy into New York City, Philadelphia, northern Virginia, Chicago, and Seattle… Previous ICE raids led to distressing scenes in downtown Los Angeles after protests quickly escalated into full-blown riots over the last five days. 

“Newsom condemned Trump’s decisions during an emotional televised address Tuesday night, when he likened the president’s actions to those of an ‘authoritarian’ regime… ‘If some of us can be snatched off the streets without a warrant, based only on suspicion or skin color, then none of us are safe. Authoritarian regimes begin by targeting people who are least able to defend themselves. But they do not stop there… California may be first — but it clearly won’t end here. Other states are next… There are no longer any checks and balances. Congress is nowhere to be found. [House] Speaker [Mike] Johnson has completely abdicated that responsibility…’ 

“While the California governor spent most of his address attacking Trump, he pleaded with protesters not to turn to violence and claimed authorities have arrested ‘more than 370 people’ who participated in ‘criminal behavior’ and are actively looking to take more into custody… 

“As law enforcement continues to try to get the chaos in the city under control, other parts of the US have begun to see an uptick in unrest, with anti-ICE protests sprouting up in New York City, Chicago, and San Francisco. Thousands of  angry New Yorkers took to the streets near Foley Square in the shadow of City Hall to protest the Immigration and Customs Enforcement deportations going on in the city and throughout the country on Tuesday… In Chicago, thousands of people marched downtown and eventually clashed with police…”

The Guardian added on June 10: 

“Large rallies also took place in Dallas and Austin on Monday, and up to 1,800 protests are planned nationwide on Saturday, to coincide with the military parade Donald Trump is throwing on his birthday in the nation’s capital.” 

Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbot has already ordered state National Guard troops deployed to San Antonio in anticipation of immigration protests this week. 

Trump to Liberate Los Angeles? 

Newsmax wrote on June 11: 

“President Donald Trump called protesters in Los Angeles ‘animals’ and ‘a foreign enemy’ in a speech at Fort Bragg on Tuesday as he defended deploying the military on demonstrators opposed to his immigration enforcement raids and as he vowed to ‘liberate’ the West Coast city… Trump’s intense comments came as he has left open the possibility of invoking the Insurrection Act, one of the most extreme emergency powers available to the president. It authorizes him to deploy military forces inside the U.S. to suppress rebellion or domestic violence or to enforce the law in certain situations… 

“The president called Los Angeles ‘a trash heap’ with ‘entire neighborhoods under control’ of criminals… 

“Trump said earlier Tuesday that there would be more immigration raids and that any additional protests would be met with even greater force, including those who show up at the parade.”

He also said that Europe should learn from what Trump is doing regarding immigration and should act likewise. 

Civil War?

The Mirror wrote on June 9: 

“Americans fear civil war is beginning right before their eyes as L.A. protesters and police clash… 

“Writing on X, one user said, ‘…sadly LA looks like a scene from the 2024 Civil War movie,’ while another user asked: ‘Is the US now in de facto civil war or is that not yet what they call it?’ Others said they fear L.A. is the ‘beginning’ of a wider civil war across the U.S….” 

Time Magazine wrote on June 8: 

“… the ACLU condemned Trump’s decision, calling it ‘akin to a declaration of war on all Californians… We intend to file suit and hold this administration accountable and to protect our communities from further attacks.’… Daniel Kanstroom, a professor at Boston College Law School, says that this is an ‘incredibly dangerous’ moment in America… Trump’s tactics, he says, have only worsened this crisis. 

“‘When you have agents apparently arbitrarily arresting people, pulling them off the street without showing a warrant, without explaining who they are, without being respectful, then this creates a sense of terror and fear in the community, and that tends to result, sooner or later, in a kind of resistance, which is what we’re seeing develop,’ says Kanstroom.”

Trump Admits Error?

Otus wrote on June 12:

“President Donald Trump said Thursday that he may create a carveout to his mass deportation efforts for hospitality and farm workers.

“After facing criticism over immigration raids that picked up people who have lived in the U.S. for years, Trump said the White House is looking at executive action that would exempt employees of some farmers and hotels from the administration’s sweeping immigration enforcement push.”

This is all Trump’s doing and should not have happened in the first place. Also, effective June 12, Trump terminated humanitarian parole for about 450,000 aliens from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. Their work authorization was revoked—contributing further to the destruction of America’s economy.

Trump’s Fury Backfires

The New Republic wrote on June 11:

“The media has it wrong. Trump is not coming across as fearsome and strong… With President Donald Trump sending more troops into Los Angeles amid protests there, a remarkable image has gone viral on social media. It shows members of the National Guard crowded into a sterile-looking office, sleeping on a hard floor, in evident discomfort, all dressed in full military gear.

“The image doesn’t just reveal awful planning for this dispatching of troops. It also captures the deeper absurdity of this entire operation: These members of the military were supposedly needed to quell an urgent emergency, but as it has turned out, they were simply not needed for this purpose at all…

“The Wall Street Journal… says that in May, top Trump adviser Stephen Miller told Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials that Trump was displeased with lagging deportation numbers. Miller told ICE officials that they are not merely supposed to target gang members and violent criminals, and instead must ‘just go out there and arrest illegal aliens.’ It’s this order that inspired the ICE sweep at a Home Depot in Los Angeles that led to where we are right now, reports the Journal.

“… by definition this entails targeting day laborers—that is, going after people who want to work and whose labor is in demand, meaning it inherently constitutes the opposite of hunting for dangerous criminals. Worse, Trump and Miller are not just neglecting serious criminal migrants to target more noncriminals; to do so, they’re also actively shifting law enforcement resources away from other serious crimes, from drug trafficking to child exploitation…

“And polling data shows that while generalized deportations sometimes poll well, majorities do not support removals of longtime residents, noncriminals, and people with jobs. Voters want a law-based, orderly immigration system, but they don’t harbor Trump-Miller’s deep ideological hostility to the mere presence of undocumented immigrants…”

ABC Correspondent Suspended After Attacking Stephen Miller 

The New York Post wrote on June 8: 

“ABC News’ senior national correspondent Terry Moran [went] on a late-night screed against top White House adviser Stephen Miller along with President Trump on social media — drawing scathing backlash from the Trump administration. 

“Moran… blasted Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy, as a man ‘richly endowed with the capacity for hatred’… ‘He’s a world-class hater,’ the ABC News reporter added… ‘He eats his hate… Trump is a world-class hater. But his hatred [is] only a means to an end, and that end [is] his own glorification. That’s his spiritual nourishment.’ 

“ABC News announced Sunday that it was suspending him over concerns about him violating the outlet’s standards on impartiality and objectivity. ‘ABC News stands for objectivity and impartiality in its news coverage and does not condone subjective personal attacks on others. The post does not reflect the views of ABC News and violated our standards — as a result, Terry Moran has been suspended pending further evaluation,’ a spokesperson told The Post. Moran later deleted his posts, but not before they were screen-shotted and spread across X like wildfire… Moran’s tirade against Miller came as tensions boiled over in Los Angeles… During this time, Miller publicly ripped the riots as an ‘insurrection.’… 

“The ABC news correspondent hasn’t been shy about weighing in on some of the politically dicey subjects he covers. Last November, Moran explained that he predicted Trump would win in 2016 and 2024. ‘The way to understand Trump (as I said on ABC Election Night 2016) is to see him not as a Republican or Democrat, not as a conservative or liberal, but as a Nationalist,’ he posted on X last November. ‘And, like many nationalist leaders, he is a man with an authoritarian cast of mind and a personality to match,” he added, noting that he was ‘not endorsing any political point of view.’ 

“In April, Moran notched a highly coveted interview with Trump for his 100 days in office milestone. The two had sparred over Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s deportation to El Salvador and alleged ties to MS-13. In December, ABC paid $15 million to settle a defamation lawsuit Trump brought against the news network over George Stephanopoulos’ use of the word ‘rape’ to describe the civil sexual abuse judgement against Trump in a case brought by E. Jean Carroll. Trump has denied wrongdoing in that case.” 

Subsequently, Disney’s ABC fired Moran on Tuesday. One may ask what was really behind ABC’s actions. The explanation given by ABC is laughable and not believable. It needs to be stated that Miller is perceived by many as a highly controversial figure whose rage has been broadcast even on conservative channels like Fox News.   

Biden Cover-Up Worse Than Watergate

The Ron Paul Institute wrote on June 5, 2025: 

“For years, Jake Tapper, the leading newsreader for CNN, has been very unfair to and very biased against Republicans in general, and to President Trump in particular. Now, in an attempt to restore some of his lost credibility, he has written a new book with Alex Thompson of Axios about the Biden health cover-up. He apparently is embarrassed and/or feels guilty about all he did in a very partisan way to try to keep a very unhealthy Joe Biden in office as president, but I will give him credit for now admitting to some extent how wrong he was. Of course, he is putting most of the blame on the White House staff… 

“He said: ‘Alex and I are here to say that conservative media was right and conservative media was correct and that there should be a lot of soul-searching, not just among me, but among the legacy media.’ In an interview with Piers Morgan, Tapper said the cover-up of Biden’s health by the White House, aided by Tapper and most of the national media, was ‘maybe even worse’ than the Watergate scandal… 

“Tapper’s book apparently says that Biden’s inner circle ‘couldn’t believe how easily (the media) swallowed campaign lies’… Much of the mainstream media was doing everything it could to protect and promote Biden… In the summer of 2023, the New York Times reported that ‘people who deal with him regularly, including some of his adversaries, say he remains sharp and commanding in private meetings’ and ‘he has at times exerted striking stamina.’ 

“His two young press secretaries said at different times they were having trouble keeping up with him and that videos shown by Fox News and other conservative media were ‘deep fake.’ Yet, several months before the election, the Biden campaign tried to film a town hall meeting to use on TV ads, but they couldn’t use it because, according to the Tapper book, Biden ‘couldn’t put together coherent thoughts.’ The book also said Hunter Biden was ‘effectively chief of staff.’” 

The cover-up was indeed outrageous and constitutes embarrassing testimony for the political agenda of the mass media. 

Was a Coup Planned in Washington Against German Chancellor? 

Der Westen wrote on June 5: 

“Former ‘Bild’ editor-in-chief Julian Reichelt could have caused the bombshell of the day. Many press representatives from Berlin had already anticipated an unpleasant surprise for Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office. Possibly even a scandal! Just as with the visits of Volodymyr Zelenskyy or South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. Would Trump want to expose and humiliate his guest from Germany? 

“When Reichelt was suddenly spotted in the White House, speculation began. The controversial head of the far-right portal ‘Nius’ was not traveling to Washington as part of Merz’s press delegation. 

“So it was clear that Reichelt was smuggled into the White House by the Trump side. For an appearance to attack Merz in the middle of the US capital in front of the press? That freedom of expression was supposedly restricted in Germany or that the AfD is being suppressed by the state? Trump’s vice president, JD Vance, struck a similar tone months ago at the Munich Security Conference. Vance appeared to be sitting on the sofa, lurking with anticipation. 

“But things didn’t go according to plan for Reichelt. His appearance briefly caused a stir online, but he didn’t get a chance to ask Trump or Merz a question… ‘Welt’ journalist Robin Alexander, who was present in the Oval Office himself, reported… : ‘Julian started a question in which the word “freedom” appeared, but was drowned out…’ The journalist was unfortunate enough to be seated in the second row, thus not in Trump’s direct line of sight.” 

Handelsblatt wrote on June 5: 

“Surprise guest in the White House: ‘Nius’ editor-in-chief Julian Reichelt is the only German journalist who was not part of the Merz delegation present in the Oval Office. A total of 18 people from the Merz delegation, including journalists, were granted access to the Oval Office. Reichelt managed to attend outside of official channels. His presence underscores two developments: the White House is placing increasing emphasis on the influence of right-wing media – and: official channels are becoming less and less relevant for networking and access.” 

Merz had been warned before his trip not to fall into the trap, like Zelensky had done, which might be prepared by Trump, especially in regard to the issue of freedom of speech and the press in Germany. Trump asked twice at the end of the press conference whether there weren’t any questions for Merz—was this the set-up? But the other journalists made so much noise, maybe intentionally so, that Reichelt was not heard. And only one asked a question of Merz. The other one asked something of Trump. And then Trump ended the press conference with his good friend Friedrich. 

After the meeting, Merz said that the issue regarding the AfD did not come up, not even in his private talks with Trump,  because the Trump Administration “must have recognized by now how problematic the AfD is.” He also reiterated that it is Germany’s responsibility, and Germany’s alone, as to how to deal with the AfD. But this issue is not off the table. 

The American Dream—Gone! 

TTW wrote on June 9: 

“Australia now stands firmly beside Canada, Mexico, Germany, the UK, Spain, and South Korea in a growing movement to cancel trips to the United States. The shift is loud, deliberate, and impossible to ignore. These countries aren’t just reducing travel—they’re choosing easier, safer, more welcoming destinations. And the US once the dream, is now the detour. 

“Australia is walking away. Canada is turning inward. Mexico is rerouting. Germany, the UK, Spain, and South Korea are all following suit. The travel tides are changing fast. But why now? Why all at once? 

“The truth is hidden in plain sight. It’s in the headlines. It’s in the airports. It’s in the anxious conversations of travelers second-guessing their plans. And now, it’s becoming a global pattern… 

“Australia’s love affair with U.S. travel is fading fast. Once a top destination for Aussie tourists, the United States is now facing a major pullback. Flights are being rebooked. Itineraries are being torn up. And travel dollars are being redirected toward countries that feel safer, friendlier, and more predictable… the impact on America’s tourism industry is quickly becoming undeniable. 

“The warning signs have been building for months. Across travel forums, group chats, and travel agencies, Aussies are voicing the same concerns. Getting into the U.S. feels like a gamble. The visa process is stressful. Border experiences are unpredictable. And recent policies have created a climate of anxiety and hesitation. Moreover, Australia’s travelers are highly informed. They watch the global news, follow political shifts, and study how tourists are being treated. And what they see coming out of the U.S. in 2025 is turning them away. 

Aggressive airport checks. Talk of tariffs and trade feuds. Headlines filled with cultural tension. It all adds up. The perception is clear: visiting America no longer feels like a holiday—it feels like a risk… 

“For the U.S., this trend couldn’t come at a worse time. Just as the industry was inching back toward pre-pandemic levels, international travel is stalling. One market at a time… The decline is not just inconvenient. It’s financially devastating

“While the U.S. struggles to retain interest, other regions are thriving. Japan, South Korea, Italy, Greece, and Portugal are seeing a surge in Australian tourists… European destinations are capitalizing on America’s decline by offering cultural depth, visa-free access, and streamlined travel infrastructure… 

“Campaigns like ‘Visit the USA’ are falling flat in Australia. Instead, travelers are being drawn in by digital influencers, local tour deals in Europe and Asia, and a growing awareness that the U.S. trip they once dreamed of may no longer be worth the cost—or the worry… With Canadians, Mexicans, and now Australians pulling back, the trend is global. It signals something deeper: America’s image as a traveler-friendly nation is being questioned…” 

Trust in Trump Government “Completely Gone” 

The Ron Paul Institute wrote on June 10: 

“… the wild optimism that greeted the inauguration of Trump has turned to something different, a mixture of incredulity from the grassroots combined with outrage and disgust from the legacy media and establishment that fought this revolution at every turn… The new leaders – elected to change course…, began with tremendous bravado and sweeping edicts that seemed promising. Four months later, they are asking for patience while dealing with legacy barriers on all sides from media harassment to court blockages.  

“The trouble is that public trust is completely gone. The whole country, traumatized by years of lies [under Biden], has become Missouri: show me.  

“First, no one believes that the ‘one big beautiful bill’ is just a first step on the way to future draconian cuts. We’ve seen this too many times, which is why Elon Musk finally broke his silence and denounced the entire ‘massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill’ as ‘a disgusting abomination.’ That has set off a power struggle for the ages.  

“Second, in areas of government transparency, there have been some steps but not nearly enough to fulfill the promises. There are still no new Epstein files. The JFK files are a mess and incomplete. We know no more than already public information about the two shooters who tried to kill Trump. There are still many lingering questions about 9-11, the Covid disaster, and so much else. This is not the opening for which the people had hoped.  

“Third, let’s talk more at length about the public health area of policy where we’ve seen the most progress. We have a new and excellent Executive Order on science. Tax-funded Covid testing has ended. A contract of $750M for a Bird flu shot has been cancelled. There are new limits on gain-of-function research, and experiments on beagles and other animals are over. Many terrible contracts from NIH have been cancelled while parts of the CDC have been dismantled… 

“Above all else, what we really need is the blunt truth about the last five years. We need to know that the people in office, whether elected or appointed, still share the deep outrage that fueled the movement that put them in power. We need to hear frank talk about the harms, the mandates, the suffering, the deceptions, the payoffs, the graft, the abuses, the illegal vanquishing of freedom, science, and human rights.  

“It is not enough to proclaim a new Golden Age and be done with it. This pertains to every aspect of public life. Press conferences by the new officeholders, with smiles and promises of better behavior in the future, don’t cut it given the mass loss of trust, rampant cynicism, and grassroots fury. There must be more straight talk, more decisive action that goes to the heart of what happened, and some degree of accountability…” 

Israel Attacks Iran

The Jerusalem Post wrote on June 13:

“Dozens of Israeli aircraft participated in an initial wave of strikes on dozens of military targets and Iranian nuclear sites early on Friday morning. Warning sirens have been set off to get the public ready for potential Iranian counterattacks of ballistic missiles on Israel.

“Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated Iran is gearing up to produce tens of thousands of ballistic missiles, which could kill millions of Israelis even without nuclear weapons, but imagine if any of them had nuclear weapons on them. Further, Netanyahu stated Iran may only be a few months away from being able to actually make a nuclear weapon…

“In recent days, Iran developed a plan with Hezbollah, Hamas, and other proxies to destroy the State of Israel, potentially including attempts to attack via all borders, including Egypt and Jordan… Israel has had strong coordination with the US, but Israeli military officials refused to say whether America was pre-updated or fully coordinated into the current attack, coming hours after Washington seemed to suggest it might not be in the loop or approve… ‘Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran. We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,’ Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement.”

Tusk Wins Confidence Vote 

Deutsche Welle reported on June 11: 

“Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk won a parliamentary vote of confidence in his pro-European government on Wednesday, just days after a stinging presidential election defeat… [The] inability to deliver on key reforms — which also includes abortion rights — despite holding a parliamentary majority, has been a dark cloud over Tusk’s government… 

“In Poland, the prime minister, chosen by parliament, holds most day-to-day power, while the president, as the head of state, can influence foreign policy and veto legislation… Opposition leaders had seized the moment to signal Tusk’s downfall. Former Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro told reporters, ‘The lost presidential election is the end of Donald Tusk. His fate is already sealed.’” 

Maybe not… 

Germany to Introduce Compulsory Military Service? 

DPA wrote on June 6: 

“The head of the organization that represents Germany’s armed forces personnel has called for the reintroduction of compulsory military service. André Wüstner, from the Bundeswehr Association, said on Friday that Germany’s new coalition government should start laying the groundwork now for the possible reintroduction of conscription. In an interview with the Deutschlandfunk radio station, Wüstner also called for voluntary military service to be made more attractive in order to achieve increased NATO targets. 

“He expressed doubts that it would be possible to recruit up to 60,000 additional men and women for active duty on a voluntary basis alone. He added that he could almost predict that a review would be necessary in the middle of the legislative period and that a switch to some form of compulsory military service would then be necessary… In view of the threats Germany faces, speed is needed to increase the number of active soldiers from 181,000 to 260,000, he argued. 

“… Defence Minister Boris Pistorius had recently made it clear on several occasions that the voluntary nature of military service agreed by the coalition only applies if the demand can be met in this way… 

“On Thursday, NATO defence ministers in Brussels agreed on the largest rearmament programme since the Cold War in response to the threat posed by Russia.” 

Compulsory Military Service is coming, even though many Germans don’t (want to) believe it. 

Germany’s Military Goals 

Oema wrote on June 5: 

“Germany in 2025 is changing. Under the leadership of Chancellor Friedrich Merz, the country is undergoing the most radical reorientation of its military policy since the end of World War II.  Merz’s goal is clear: to turn the Bundeswehr into ‘the strongest conventional military force in Europe.’ This statement, as noted in an article by The Economist, is not merely symbolic. It reflects Berlin’s new self-confidence and its intention to assume a leadership role in European security at a time when Russia is once again threatening the continent and the United States is no longer seen as a guaranteed defender of European defense. 

“The most striking evidence of this shift was the military ceremony on May 22 in Vilnius. For the first time since 1945, German armored units were permanently stationed abroad, forming the ‘Lithuania’ Brigade as part of Berlin’s NATO commitment. The symbolic weight of this move is immense. For decades, German politicians avoided such actions, mindful of World War II memories and a deeply ingrained societal stance on military restraint. But today, the facts are changing. 

“Berlin’s pivot comes with significant investments. Merz and the Defense Ministry have pledged to dramatically increase the defense budget in order to renew the arsenal, boost readiness, and fill personnel gaps. At the same time, the industrial sector is being strengthened: new orders for Leopard tanks, missile systems, and electronic defense systems are activating German defense manufacturers. At the core of this strategy lies the desire for strategic autonomy—not only for Germany, but for all of Europe

“However, transforming the Bundeswehr is no easy task. Military infrastructure remains outdated, staffing shortages are widespread, and public support is not a given. German society remains divided. Some welcome Merz’s decisiveness and believe the country must shoulder greater responsibility. Others fear that expanding the military’s role could stir tensions, especially with the historical burden of the past still fresh. 

“What’s clear is that Germany is not merely aiming for defensive sufficiency. It seeks a strategic role, power, and influence within Europe’s security architecture. And if Merz’s plan succeeds, Berlin will not only be able to defend itself but also lead Europe both politically and militarily. Germany’s new military might is no longer a ghost of the past—it’s the foundation of a different geopolitical reality unfolding before our eyes.” 

Indeed it is. 

No Peace Between Russia and Ukraine 

Newsweek wrote on June 9: 

“The Ukraine war won’t end until NATO withdraws troops from the Baltics, a top Russian official has warned… [Sergei] Ryabkov’s comments mark a shift in the Kremlin’s position. He suggested that the conflict’s roots lie not only in Ukraine itself but in NATO’s eastward expansion… NATO maintains a strong military presence in the Baltic States, with multinational battle groups and brigades stationed in Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovakia… 

“The Kremlin had said Ukraine must abandon its ambitions to join NATO as a condition for ending the war, but Ryabkov appeared to signal to Tass that the alliance must withdraw completely from the Baltics as well… Moscow and Kyiv will continue to launch strikes on each other’s territory, with the war in Ukraine showing few signs of a peace deal in the near future.”

What Germans and Russians Think…

Deutsche Welle wrote on June 5: 

“The vast majority — 84% — of those [Germans] surveyed thought that Russia could not be relied upon, and 73% said the same of the USIsrael was also classified as no longer reliable by a clear majority. Only 16% of respondents still regarded Israel as a partner that Germany can rely on — an 11% drop compared with October 2024… The Israeli course of action in Gaza has gone too far, according to 63% of respondents, while 18% thought it was appropriate. 

“Seventy-seven percent of respondents thought it was right that Chancellor Friedrich Merz criticized Israel for its current military conduct in Gaza. Only one in eight thought Germany should unconditionally support Israel in the Gaza conflict… Almost exactly as many respondents blame Israel for the situation faced by Palestinian civilians in Gaza as blame Hamas… 43% supported restricting weapons exports to Israel, and a further 30% wanted a complete stop… 

“Forty percent of those surveyed were satisfied with the [German] coalition’s first few weeks in office… Friedrich Merz of the CDU has gained considerable popularity since taking office as Germany’s chancellor. Of those surveyed, 39% were satisfied with his work, up 14% since April. Vice Chancellor and Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil of the SPD, also has a 39% approval rating. The only high-profile German politician who most citizens are satisfied with remains Defense Minister Boris Pistorius (SPD).

How easily gullible Germans can become deceived and manipulated…At the same time, most Russians consider Germany as their greatest enemy, followed by the United Kingdom and Ukraine. They consider Belarus, China, India and North Korea as their greatest friends. These “friendly” countries, together with Russia, would all be part of the prophesied Kings of the East. 

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News

The World Loves Dead Jews 

Israel Today wrote on May 28: 

“European leaders who have recently criticized Israel over its war against Hamas in Gaza have succumbed to political pressure fueled by a nefarious international media campaign against the Jewish state, Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Sharren Haskel said on Tuesday. The unequivocal remarks by Israel’s second-highest diplomat come amid some of the harshest criticism leveled against Israel by British, German, French and Canadia leaders since the war began nearly 20 months ago, following the Hamas-led massacre on Oct. 7, 2023. 

“‘What we are seeing is the capitulation of several European leaders to a very loud political campaign in countries with a massive immigrant influx from many Muslim countries, together with an immense propaganda campaign waged against Israel on international TV networks,’ Haskel told JNS ahead of a series of meetings in Europe this week. ‘The world loves dead Jews, and one day after they turn their backs on us,’ she said, referring to the day after the Oct. 7 massacre… 

“Haskel singled out the BBC, which she accused of a long-standing bias against Israel… ‘We are seeing the persecution and racism against Jews around the globe in ways we have never seen before since the Holocaust,’ Haskel said. ‘It always starts with the Jews, and then it comes for the rest of humanity.’” 

France 24/AFP wrote on May 30: 

“The United Nations condemned Friday a [Palestinian] group of ‘armed individuals’ for raiding warehouses in the Palestinian territory of Gaza and looting large amounts of medical supplies. The group ‘stormed the warehouses at a field hospital in Deir al-Balah, looting large quantities of medical equipment, supplies, medicines, nutritional supplements that was intended for malnourished children,’ said Stephane Dujarric, spokesperson for UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. The stolen aid had been brought into war-ravaged Gaza just a day earlier, he said.”

Please view our new StandingWatch program, titled, “Why This Hatred for Israel and the Jews?” 

Trump Attacks BBC Over Gaza Misreporting 

The Telegraph wrote on June 3: 

“The White House has attacked the BBC’s coverage of the Gaza conflict, accusing the broadcaster of taking Hamas’s word as ‘total truth’… Donald Trump’s press secretary… accused the BBC of having to repeatedly correct its reporting from the territory about aid distribution… The BBC’s coverage of the conflict has been repeatedly accused of bias against Israel, but the White House’s comments mark an extraordinary escalation in criticism of the broadcaster…

“Ms Leavitt’s attack is the latest criticism of the BBC’s coverage of the conflict. The broadcaster was forced to pull a documentary about Gaza and apologise for ‘serious flaws’ in its making after it was revealed that the narrator was the son of a Hamas government minister… 

“Last month, the BBC’s Today programme prominently reported a claim by Tom Fletcher, the UN’s humanitarian chief, that 14,000 babies in Gaza could die within 48 hours. The corporation later issued a correction, when it emerged the figure was an estimate for the number of children at risk of ‘severe malnutrition’ by March next year. However, the claim had by then been widely reported as fact and was cited by nine Members of Parliament in the Commons…”

BBC’s latest scandalous report claimed that Israel had fired indiscriminately on Palestinian citizens—a claim which is either an outright lie or which was instigated by the terror organization Hamas to produce “martyrs.” But it’s not only BBC, of course, which is accused of reporting falsely about the crisis in Gaza. Note the next article. 

CNN Accused of False Reporting

Breitbart wrote on June 3:

“CNN persisted Tuesday in publishing fake news pushed by Hamas, claiming that ‘dozens’ of Palestinians had been killed near an American-run aid site in Gaza, despite Israeli denials and a history of Hamas lies.

“Israeli government spokesman David Mencer told journalists: ‘The IDF did not fire at civilians in, or near, humanitarian aid distribution zones.’ The story came a day after U.S. Ambassador Mike Huckabee demanded that CNN and other outlets retract false reporting of dozens of Palestinians being killed at a Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) site Sunday.

“CNN reported its story under the headline, ‘Dozens of Palestinians killed near Gaza aid distribution point, health officials say, in third day of shooting.’ It cited the Gaza ‘health ministry’ — without noting that the ‘ministry’ is controlled entirely by Hamas and has a long record of false and sensational claims — and reported that ‘Israeli forces opened fire on Palestinians as they made their way to the distribution site in Tel al-Sultan in Rafah.’

“The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) reported that its forces had fired, half a kilometer away from the aid site, at a few people who had deviated from the route and had ignored warning shots. The IDF added: ‘IDF troops are not preventing the arrival of Gazan civilians to the humanitarian aid distribution sites. The warning shots were fired approximately half a kilometer away from the humanitarian aid distribution site toward several suspects who advanced toward the troops in such a way that posed a threat to them.’

“The CNN story cited only part of the IDF statement, leaving out the denial of the main claim. CNN also left out the GHF’s denials, and its report that aid had been delivered to civilians without incident….

“The Trump administration is backing GHF (Gaza Humanitarian Foundation) as an alternative to aid distribution by the United Nations, which has been hijacked by Hamas, which steals aid and sells it to Palestinians, profiting while controlling them.” 

Waiting For the Third Temple 

Israel 365 News wrote on May 30: 

“The first Caucus for Jewish Freedom on the Temple Mount was held Thursday morning in the Knesset in English… For the first time, Jewish organizations participated in this kind of meeting, alongside Christians who want to promote sovereignty on the Temple Mount and the building of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem. Tom Nisani, CEO of ‘Beyadenu  Returning to the Temple Mount’, said: ‘… I get inquiries from all over the world that ask, “Why is there no Temple yet?”’… 

“According to Michael Oren… ‘Hamas calls this war the al-Aqsa flood. For Hamas, the objective of their October 7 attack was unambiguous: pushing the Jews out “from the river to the sea”, but specifically from the very site that gives us our legitimacy here. Their explicit goal was to “liberate Al Aqsa” from the “infidel” Jews… In recent months, an anecdote spread about an IDF soldier returning from Gaza. When his relieved mother asked what he wanted to do first, he said he needed to buy a picture of the Beit Hamikdash (Temple) for his bedroom. Surprised, she asked if he wouldn’t prefer a shower or his favorite food. The soldier responded, “Eema, you don’t understand. In Gaza, every home, government office, and school displays a picture of the Al-Aqsa Mosque.”’… 

“MK Dan Illouz also spoke, saying: ‘… The Temple Mount is where the Temples stood and where Jews pray every morning. Today, Jews are discriminated against on the Temple Mount, and that needs to change…’ 

“John Enerson, Cry for Zion [said]: ‘As a Christian, I want to say that the whole world is watching you. We support your sovereignty on the Temple Mount. If you want it, it is not a fairy tale! We are waiting for the Temple Mount to fulfill its destiny to be a house of prayer for all nations.’… 

“MK Amit Halevi said, ‘… We must demand that the presence of God and the Temple be restored to the Temple Mount. We need to demand from the American Congress the rights of the Jews on the Temple Mount.’ MK Limor Son Har-Melech [said]: ‘… Things have changed for the better on the Temple Mount, but there are still problems and obstacles until the building of the Temple.’… 

A third temple will be built in Jerusalem prior to Christ’s return. 

No Two-State Solution 

The Jerusalem Post wrote on May 29: 

“French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot delivered a speech on Wednesday [at the UN Security Council], reiterating the country’s stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, urging ‘the implementation of a two-state solution.’ Barrot also announced that France will co-host, alongside Saudi Arabia, a United Nations conference in June regarding this topic.  

“The American embassy argued in response that the implementation of a two-state solution would constitute a ‘reward for Hamas’ shocking attack on Israel,’ in reference to the May 21st Washington shooting attack at the Jewish Museum in which [anti-Semite] Elias Rodriguez killed two Israeli embassy staffers, Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Lynn Milgrim… ‘The United States stands with Israel in unequivocally rejecting any effort to unilaterally recognize a Palestinian state or impose conditions on Israel,’ the embassy stated.” 

“In response to the French ministry, Israeli Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana said that any ‘recognition of a Palestinian state is a reward for Hamas for the atrocities of October 7, and a resounding message to terrorist organizations around the world to murder, burn, rape and kidnap – this is the way.’” 

Ganging Up Against Israel 

Israel Today wrote on June 1: 

“A visit to Ramallah by the Saudi, Emirati, Qatari, Egyptian, Jordanian and Turkish foreign ministers… won’t take place. An Israeli official told reporters that the Jewish state blocked the visit, which would have been the highest-level visit by a Saudi diplomat to Judea and Samaria since the 1967 Six-Day War… ‘The Palestinian Authority, which to this day refuses to condemn the Oct. 7 massacre, intended to host in Ramallah a provocative meeting of foreign ministers from Arab countries to discuss the establishment of a Palestinian state,’ the Israeli official said. ‘Such a state would undoubtedly become a terrorist state in the heart of the land of Israel,’ the official said. ‘Israel will not cooperate with such moves aimed at harming it and its security.’ 

“The Jordanian foreign ministry stated in Arabic on Saturday that the decision is ‘a blatant violation of Israel’s obligations as the occupying power.’ The ministry stated on behalf of the delegation that it had ‘decided to postpone the visit to Ramallah in light of Israel’s obstruction of its mission by refusing the delegation entry through the airspace of the occupied West Bank, which is controlled by Israel.’” 

The nations listed above are interesting in light of Psalm 83. 

Will Netanyahu Strike Iran? 

The Sun wrote on June 1: 

“PM Netanyahu has been making preparations behind the scenes to swiftly blitz Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities as he deems the country ‘enemy number one’. Trump, however, has firmly insisted Israel take no action that could jeopardise his administration’s efforts to thrash out a deal with Iran. 

“It culminated in a heated phone call this week between the leaders as they continue to clash on how to curb Tehran’s nuke programme, sources said.” 

It was reported that even though Netanyahu would like to have America’s help, he will also strike Iran alone, if he feels that this is necessary.  It was also reported that Iran is now in a position to produce 10 nuclear bombs. 

Is Germany Sabotaging Trump’s Peace Initiative? 

The Ron Paul Institute wrote on May 29: 

“Efforts to bring peace to Ukraine just received a stifling blow. German Chancellor Fredrich Merz, with less than a month in office, has stepped forward to set back the US sponsored peace initiative… He apparently favors supplying German Taurus missiles to Ukraine… Actually, the United States, Great Britain, and France have already supplied long-range missiles to Ukraine… But the missiles had insufficient range to threaten Moscow…

“But the German Taurus missiles have sufficient range to hit smack dab in the middle of the Kremlin, the traditional embodiment of Russia’s center of power…

“Before his election, Merz actually promoted a Ukraine peace plan of his own. It involved the Taurus missiles. In an interview with Stern he said, ‘If elected, I will issue an ultimatum to Putin to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours. If he does not agree, I will supply Ukraine with long-range Taurus missiles and give permission to strike on Russian territory.’..

“Germany’s Vice Chancellor Lars Klingbeil… gave his own statement to the press saying plainly, ‘I would like to say that there is no new agreement that goes beyond what the previous government has done.’..

“RT.com reported, ‘Russia would not rule out a direct strike on Berlin if German personnel help Ukraine target Moscow with German-supplied Taurus missiles.’” 

Is Trump Administration Repeating Past Mistakes of Appeasement? 

The Independent wrote on May 30: 

“The Trump administration’s sympathy for Moscow’s anti-Nato demands has been likened to Nazi appeasement as parts of the alliance’s eastern bloc warn that the US is priming non-members for invasion. Top officials from four Eastern European countries have hit out after Donald Trump’s special envoy to Ukraine, Keith Kellogg,  appeared to support Vladimir Putin’s reported demand to have in writing that Nato will not accept any new members from the region. 

“In an interview with US network ABC News, Mr Kellogg described Putin’s latest position as a ‘fair’ one that was likely to include not just Ukraine but also Georgia and Moldova… ‘It looks like Munich, when great powers decide the fate of small ones,’ [a senior Lithuanian] official said, referencing the 1938 agreement between Adolf Hitler, the UK, France and Italy that ultimately led to Nazi Germany invading Czechoslovakia… 

“Russia invaded Georgia in 2008 and six years later began its attempted takeover of Ukraine, initially by illegally annexing Crimea. Moscow has also stationed more than a thousand troops in the Moldovan region of Transnistria, sparking fears that Moldova could be the next target for the Kremlin. Olga Rosca, foreign policy adviser to the Moldovan president, Maia Sandu, said Russia is already ‘violating our neutrality’…

“Estonian president Alar Karis said the country’s position on Nato expansion was clear: ‘Every country has the right to choose its own security arrangements…’  Jan Lipavsky, foreign minister for the Czech Republic, also hit back at Mr Kellogg’s comments late last night… 

“European officials have long cautioned that the Russian suggestion that Nato is expanding aggressively eastward is propaganda aimed at justifying its imperialistic ambitions. Putin’s attacks on Georgia and Ukraine in 2008 and 2014 came well before either country had serious chances of joining Nato, and the Russian leader’s pre-invasion speech in February 2022 made little mention of Kyiv’s Nato membership hopes…” 

Russia’s Pearl Harbor? 

The New York Post wrote on June 2: 

“Ukrainian forces stunned the Russian military Sunday after wiping out and damaging dozens of nuclear bombers and other aircraft with ambitious and complicated attacks that struck President Vladimir Putin’s air bases deep inside the country, Kyiv says. Even pro-Moscow military bloggers are calling the strike — which used drones hidden in trucks  — ‘the Russian Pearl Harbor.’… 

“The mission… hit 41 Russian heavy bombers and other warplanes at four separate airfields thousands of miles from Ukraine. The cost of the destroyed aircraft, most of which Russia no longer even manufactures, is at least $7 billion, Kyiv said. The doomsday bombers are a critical part of Russia’s nuclear deterrent — originally designed to obliterate the US and Europe with atomic weapons in the event of all-out war. 

“Ukraine said the aircraft had been converted and were being used to pummel their country with cruise missiles. Officials claimed they had destroyed more than one-third of Russia’s strategic bombers in the strike…

“Ukraine said the attack was launched in response to Russia carrying out one of its largest drone attacks since the start of the war last week, with 472 drones and seven ballistic and cruise missiles involved… In separate attacks, the collapse of two bridges near the Ukrainian border, killing at least seven people, has been blamed by Russian investigators on sabotage.”

No Peace in Sight 

The New York Post wrote on June 4: 

“President Trump spoke by phone with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday, saying it was ‘not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace’ between Russia and Ukraine… ‘President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields.’” 

That was SO predictable.  And so, the war will go on… 

Russia to Strike Soon? 

BBC wrote on June 1: 

“Members of the Western alliance Nato need to prepare for a possible attack from Russia within the next four years, according to Germany’s chief of defence.

“General Carsten Breuer told the BBC that Russia was producing hundreds of tanks a year, many of which could be used for an attack on Nato Baltic state members by 2029 or even earlier… Russia also produced four million rounds of 152mm artillery munition in 2024, and not all of it was going to Ukraine either, added Gen Breuer.”

Invasion of Taiwan Imminent? 

The Sun wrote on May 31: 

“China is ‘credibly preparing’ for a military invasion of Taiwan and the attack is ‘real and [could be] imminent’, the US Defence Secretary [Pete Hegseth] has warned…. 

“His warning comes after China deployed two hulking H-6 bombers capable of carrying nuclear weapons on a strategic island in the South China Sea… China claims almost the entire disputed waterway in the South China Sea – through which more than 60 per cent of global maritime trade passes. 

“Fears are that the weakening of Western alliances and the unpredictability of US foreign policy under Donald Trump could create the perfect atmosphere for Beijing to trigger an invasion.” 

China Steps in Where America Retreats 

Breaking Defense wrote on May 29: 

“As the US prepares African nations to rely less on Washington’s help, China is attempting to ‘replicate every type of thing’ the US military does to build and maintain relationships on the continent, according to the top US military official [Michael E. Langley]…

“Langely was speaking from Nairobi, Kenya, as the US wrapped up its participation in the African Chiefs of Defense Conference, attended by representatives from more than 30 African nations. There, amid drastic US cuts to civilian aid programs, Langley said he had a message for the leaders of African militaries: America does not want to do more for Africa, but to ‘help Africa do more for itself.’’ 

While the USA is retreating, China is stepping in.

Trump’s Air Force One Debacle 

The Huffington Post wrote on May 30: 

“Before he even took office the first time in 2017, Trump was already boasting that he would force Boeing — which had been on pace to deliver two new, purpose-built 747s by the end of that term — to slash its contract price… Among the features dropped from the required specifications list was in-flight refueling, thereby reducing the amount of time a commander-in-chief can remain aloft to only about 15 hours, rather than a week or more. 

“If a plane carrying the president cannot refuel in midair, that severely limits how and where a president can travel and be kept out of harm’s way in the event of a major attack on the United States…

“What’s more, it’s unclear whether Trump’s interference in the program will have saved taxpayers a dime…. And none of that includes the new burden taxpayers must now bear to transform Qatar’s gift to Trump… Modifying the plane could take many months or even years, meaning… hundreds of millions of dollars or more will be spent…” 

The U.S. Sun added on May 30: 

“Donald Trump’s luxury ‘sky Palace’ gifted to him by Qatar will cost a few billion dollars, says the President of Emirates airline. The US government now faces a ‘Herculean task’ to transform the huge Boeing 747-8 into a new Air Force One fit for a president, warns Sir Tim Clark… Aviation specialist Jeff Wise also told The Sun that he expects the Air Force One replacement to take years and need billions of dollars pumped into the project to make the jet viable… 

“Trump’s Air Force One jets currently in use come with dozens of specialised security features. These include armoured glass and platingon board flares to confuse enemy missiles, mirror-ball defences and even an electric jamming system

“Another unique yet needed element is an electromagnetic shield for nuclear explosions. This has to be on a presidential plane as the leader of Washington can actually launch a nuke from the aircraft. 

“But the new Qatari jet lacks most of these security features.” 

Musk Attacks Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” 

The New York Post wrote on June 3: 

“Tech mogul Elon Musk went on a tirade Tuesday against President Trump’s marquee One Big Beautiful Bill Act days after leaving the administration — ripping the legislation as an ‘abomination’ and condemning lawmakers who supported it. ‘I’m sorry, but I just can’t stand it anymore,’ the Tesla and SpaceX CEO wrote on his X platform. ‘This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.’ 

“The 53-year-old added in subsequent posts that the bill ‘will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America [sic] citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.’ In a third post, Musk groused that ‘Congress is making America bankrupt.’ ‘In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people [apparently suggesting Republican politicians should be kicked out of Congress at the midterms],’ he later fumed… 

“Multiple estimates have found that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will increase the federal deficit by between $3 trillion and $4 trillion over a 10-year period… 

“The billionaire’s diatribe against the measure comes amid delicate negotiations among Republican lawmakers. The mammoth bill cleared the House last month but still needs to go through the Senate and then the House again before it can get to Trump’s desk.  Multiple lawmakers have complained that they’ve since discovered provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of which they weren’t aware. [So, they did not even read the bill before signing it!

“Far-right Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) flagged a provision in the bill that curtails state rights to regulate artificial intelligence over the next 10 years. She said Tuesday that she would have voted against the bill if she had known it was in there.  Last week, Rep. Mike Flood (R-Neb.) admitted during a town hall that he wasn’t privy to a provision in the megabill that restrains district judges’ ability to hold people in contempt… The measure spans 1,038 pages, and was quickly rammed through the House following marathon markup sessions by multiple House committees… [This is SO shameful indeed.]

“Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), one of two GOP ‘nay’ votes in the House alongside Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio), praised Musk’s screed, saying on X that ‘he’s right.’ The world’s richest man holds significant sway over fiscal hawks in both chambers of Congress. Last month, he publicly lamented that congressional Republicans neglected to codify the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cuts he helped shepherd. Almost immediately after, a chorus of GOP lawmakers in Congress began demanding that leadership do so. In December of last year, Musk helped torpedo a government funding agreement to avert a government shutdown. That prompted GOP leadership to back off and put forward a significantly watered-down spending patch to keep the government’s lights on…” 

Breitbart added on June 4: “Trump has also made clear that he wants the bill on his desk by the Fourth of July.” 

Musk also wrote in another post: “This immense level of overspending will drive America into debt slavery!” 

It was also reported that two Republican senators, Mike Lee (Utah) and Rand Paul (Ky.), signaled their agreement with Musk, who in turn shared posts from Republicans in Congress who publicly aligned with him. Behind the scenes, Trump reportedly is livid, but until June 5, he had not come out publicly against Musk who was the biggest donor in the 2024 political cycle, donating $288 million to help elect Trump and other Republican candidates.

Feud Between Musk and Trump Escalates

The Sun wrote on June 5:

“The feud began when Trump addressed Musk’s criticism of the president’s ‘big beautiful bill’ in the Oval Office. But it dramatically escalated when the Tesla mogul called for the president’s impeachment [and replacement with J.D. Vance] and brought up Trump’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein…. Trump later threatened to cut Musk’s government contracts by saying it would save a lot of money… 

“Musk responded to Trump’s threats with a threat of his own. ‘In light of the President’s statement about cancellation of my government contracts, Space X will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately,’ he said. The SpaceX Dragon spacecraft was the one that brought stranded astronauts back safe to Earth after 268 days in March.”

Chilling Warning About the “Enemy Within” America 

Daily Mail wrote on May 30: 

“JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon has sounded the alarm about the ‘enemy within’ America… 

“Dimon claims that the United States is suffering from a worrying government ‘mismanagement’ issue…. Dimon, the boss of America’s biggest bank, cautioned that the ‘mismanagement’ that occurs at all levels of government could be the biggest catalyst for the nation’s economic demise. ‘The amount of mismanagement is extraordinary – by state, by city, for pensions, and that stuff is going to kill us,’ the billionaire banker [said]… 

“Dimon sounded the alarm on a ‘crack’ appearing in the bond market as a result of the wildly soaring national debt – which Trump is set to compound with the $3 trillion Big Beautiful Bill awaiting Senate approval. A ‘crack’ in the bond market occurs when investors lose confidence in the government’s ability to service its debt. Bonds are sold, yields go higher and the cost of borrowing increases for all Americans, including the government itself. 

“’You are going to see a crack in the bond market… I’m telling you it’s going to happen, and you’re going to panic’…. Dimon clarified that a crack in the market hasn’t happened yet, but is confident it will occur. .. 

“His remarks… come just days after he delivered a sobering assessment of the US economy  and warned the true fallout from Trump’s sweeping tariff policy has yet to be felt… Dimon said behind the scenes of a soaring stock market lies a deep and under-appreciated risk… Dimon pulled no punches as he described Trump’s tariff strategy as ‘pretty extreme,’ even in its scaled-back form following an April 2 announcement that placed most tariffs on a temporary 90-day pause…” 

America’s downfall, due to “enemies from within” and “from without,” is inevitable.

Deal Between U.S. Steel and Japan 

ABC News reported on May 30: 

“President Donald Trump on Friday touted a ‘blockbuster agreement’ between U.S. Steel and Japanese company Nippon Steel… Trump discussed the ‘partnership’ between the two companies during a rally at the Irvin Works plant in Allegheny County on Friday evening… During the event, Trump also announced his plan to double a current 25% tariff on [all] steel imports to 50%… 

“Trump told the crowd Nippon would invest a total of $14 billion as part of the deal… Trump emphasized that the U.S. Steel headquarters would stay in Pittsburgh

“U.S. Steel would still be ‘controlled by the USA,’ Trump said, adding, ‘Otherwise, I wouldn’t have done the deal.’ But he did not explicitly say how the ownership of the company would be structured. Despite hailing the agreement during the rally, Trump later told reporters that he hasn’t seen the final [deal] yet… 

“During the 2024 campaign, Trump pledged to block the Japanese steelmaker from purchasing U.S. Steel. As president-elect, he repeated that vow. ‘I am totally against the once great and powerful U.S. Steel being bought by a foreign company, in this case Nippon Steel of Japan,’ Trump wrote in a post… The Biden administration in January blocked the sale of U.S. Steel to Nippon Steel over national security concerns. The White House said at the time it was important to keep one of the largest steel producers in the nation an American-owned company

“Nippon was seeking 100% ownership of U.S. Steel in talks with Trump…” 

Trump Attacks Court of International Trade 

The New York Post wrote on May 29: 

“President Trump on Thursday rebuked the trio of judges [nominated by Reagan, Obama and Trump] who overturned his sweeping tariff agenda the day before – calling out ‘backroom hustlers’ and slamming the Court of International Trade’s ruling as ‘horrific’ and a threat to ‘Presidential Power.’… A federal appeals court stayed the trade court’s order on Thursday as the White House appeals the initial ruling… 

“The horrific decision stated that I would have to get the approval of Congress for these Tariffs,’ he fumed. ‘In other words, hundreds of politicians would sit around D.C. for weeks, and even months, trying to come to a conclusion as to what to charge other Countries that are treating us unfairly. If allowed to stand, this would completely destroy Presidential Power — The Presidency would never be the same!’…

“Trump claimed the trade court’s ruling ‘is being hailed all over the World by every Country, other than the United States of America.’” 

In an apparent response to the ruling, Trump posted a cryptic meme on Wednesday night declaring that he is “on a mission from God.” 

America Breaks Its Promises… Again! 

NPR wrote on May 30: 

“The Supreme Court on Friday allowed the Trump administration to temporarily pause a humanitarian program that has allowed nearly half a million people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela to enter the U.S. and remain here legally for two years. The move to grant a stay in the case means that the Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans who were granted temporary parole under the program known as CHNV would lose their temporary legal status to be in the U.S. — and could potentially be deported while the case plays out in the lower courts… 

“The court did not give a reason in its brief order. But in a lengthy dissent from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor joining, Jackson wrote that the court ‘has plainly botched this assessment today’ in causing irreparable harm for everyone admitted under the program… The program… has allowed individuals from the four countries to enter the U.S. temporarily for humanitarian reasons, usually because conditions in their home country pose a threat to their safety… 

“The federal law authorizing such humanitarian ‘parole’ dates back to the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act. It was first used to provide temporary entry for some 30,000 Hungarians fleeing their country after a failed attempt at overturning Soviet rule and a crackdown that followed. In the decades since then, every administration, including the first Trump administration, has used the parole program to meet some emergency immigration need, allowing individuals who have been screened and approved to enter the U.S. if they have a U.S. sponsor willing to provide financial and other support. Individuals granted such temporary status can, once here, apply for asylum or some other more permanent status. 

“The Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela parole program, known as the CHNV program, is similar to programs created in the wake of the Russian invasion of Ukraine when some 200,000 people were granted temporary parole, and the U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan, when more than 76,000 Afghanis fled, many of them people who worked to assist U.S. forces there. So far, the Trump administration has not tried to end the Ukraine programs, but it has terminated the Afghan program, effective July 14. 

“President Trump, however, on the day he took office signed an executive order directing the Department of Homeland Security to end ‘all categorical parole programs.’ In March, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem formally announced the termination of the CHNV parole process, declaring that it was being terminated immediately, and that the cessation would apply to all people currently enrolled in the program. It was the first en masse termination of such a program on record. Noem’s order said that the interests of the parolees, and their reliance on the government’s promise of protection for two years, were outweighed by the government’s ‘strong interest’ in deporting them through expedited removal, rather than normal removal proceedings under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

“A group of individuals whose temporary protection had been guaranteed for two years, and their sponsors, challenged Noem’s order in court, and a federal district court judge in Massachusetts ruled in their favor. Judge Indira Talwani said that the secretary had erred in seeking to expedite removal of individuals who still had time left on their promised two-year protection in the U.S. The judge also said that the secretary’s en masse ending of the two-year term violated the statutory requirement that parole be determined only on a case-by-case basis…” 

The bottom line is, the US government made a promise which the Trump administration is now breaking. This is the sad history of US “promises,” especially in regard to their deceitful and ungodly “dealing” with the American Indians. 

Trump’s New Travel Bans

Daily Mail wrote on June 5:

“President Donald Trump has announced widespread bans and restrictions for visitors from 19 countries…

“Nationals of Afghanistan, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen will be barred from entering the United States under the new order, which goes into effect on June 9. Citizens of Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will be partially restricted from traveling, removing access to all immigrant visas and several non-immigrant travel options.

“Trump also issued a warning that Egypt could soon join the no-fly list in the wake of the Colorado terror attack in which an Egyptian national who overstayed his visa allegedly set fire to pro-Israel demonstrators…

“Several of the nations facing bans have been targeted because their screening and vetting capabilities are not up to the president’s standards, putting Egypt on high alert…. the nations included on the list have disappointed Trump in various ways, either by having a high rate of nationals who overstay their visas or by limiting the United States’ access to security data…

“The primary concern for Iranian nationals is that the government ‘is a state sponsor of terrorism’… Similarly, the inclusion of Somalia comes after ‘The United States Government identified Somalia as a terrorist safe haven… Haitian nationals, Trump argued, have a higher likelihood of trying to overstay their visas… Eritrea, for example, has been included on the list because ‘the United States questions the competence of the central authority for issuance of passports or civil documents in Eritrea.’…

“Looking ahead to the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, Trump has already added a clause in his proclamation which states: ‘Any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event’ will be exempt.”

Biden Dead? 

The Daily Mail wrote on June 1: 

“President Donald Trump shared a bizarre theory on social media Saturday night that suggested Joe Biden died in 2020 and has since been replaced by a ‘clone.’… ‘There is no…JoeBiden – executed in 2020… Biden clones doubles & robotic engineered soulless mindless entities are what you see,’ wrote [a little known user with fewer than 1000 followers] named llijh… 

“Trump did not add any of his own commentary to the post, but simply amplifying the wild conspiracy created confusion. Almost immediately, social media erupted, with supporters and critics alike grappling with the surreal suggestion… 

[The New York Post added on June 1: “Trump last met Biden in person roughly five months ago during Inauguration Day, and shared the debate stage with him in both 2020 and 2024.”] 

“Trump’s casual amplification served to underscore the surreal and conspiratorial environment that defines the MAGA movement. This isn’t the first time Trump has danced with conspiracy theories. 

“Throughout his first term as president Trump continued to give oxygen to baseless theories: suggesting Ted Cruz’s father was involved in the JFK assassination, refusing to fully distance himself from QAnon, and promoting claims of massive voter fraud during the 2020 election without evidence. [There is much evidence, however, that the election was rigged]. 

“Trump was the most prominent promoter of the so-called ‘birther’ conspiracy, falsely claiming that President Barack Obama was not born in the United States. For years, Trump demanded Obama’s birth certificate and continued to suggest it was fraudulent even after Obama released the official long-form document. It wasn’t until 2016, under mounting political pressure, that Trump finally admitted Obama was born in the US – without apology or acknowledgment of the damage the false claims had caused. [Trump should have never conceded. There is mounting evidence that Obama was NOT born in the USA. The “official long-form” from Hawaii was not an original, and the version produced appears to have been doctored. The original short form went missing, and the custodian of record died in a mysterious plane crash.] 

“But suggesting the idea that a former president of the United States was a ‘clone’ pushes the envelope even further.” 

This of course IS crazy. 

Attacks on the Unvaccinated–CDC Is At It Again! 

Daily Mail wrote on May 31: 

“The CDC is urging Americans to cancel their upcoming [international] flights if they are not vaccinated against measles. The agency has upgraded its health travel warning after discovering the virus… is spreading on US airplanes. A previous recommendation that said Americans should ‘consider making alternative travel plans’ if they could not get vaccinated before departing now says travelers should ‘consider postponing their trip.’ 

“Estimates suggest around 10 percent of adults may lack immunity, either due to never receiving the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine or because their immunity has diminished over time… the CDC confirmed at least one case where the virus was spread during air travel… 

“The latest airport warning came Friday as three passengers flying into Denver International Airport on [a] Turkish Airlines flight tested positive for measles. One of them was a vaccinated adult… 

“Around 90 percent of confirmed cases are tied to outbreaks in the US rather than travel outside the country.”

Absolutely stupid! Haven’t we learned anything yet from the CDC’s ridiculous “recommendations”—and worse—during the Covid “pandemic”? And so, the outrageous and unscientific attacks against the “unvaccinated” continue with full force. 

Epstein Committed Suicide?

The FBI announced that they would release a video proving that no one was in Epstein’s cell, putting to rest the notion that he was murdered. However, the Drudge Report issued immediately a flashback article from the BBC, dated January 10, 2020, painting a totally different picture: 

“Soon after Epstein’s death, in August, two of the CCTV cameras outside his cell had malfunctioned and were being examined by the FBI, US media reported… 

“Epstein was found semi-conscious in his prison cell with injuries to his neck on 25 July. After this incident, he was placed on suicide watch. Eventually, Epstein was moved to a different cell, where he died on 10 August. Two prison guards have since been accused of failing to check on him during this time and falsifying records to say that they had… 

“There have been ongoing questions over the July recording, which was initially deemed missing and then was said to have been located by jail staff. A letter filed by Assistant US Attorneys Jason Swergold and Maurene Comey said ‘the footage contained on the preserved video was for the correct date and time, but captured a different tier than the one where Cell-1 was located’, New York City media report. ‘The requested video no longer exists on the backup system and has not since at least August 2019 as a result of technical errors.’”

Fox News reported on June 4:

“FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said Wednesday… ‘ We do have video. It’s not the greatest video in the world. I don’t want to set expectations on fire’… ‘However, the video does show in that specific block, that he goes in, made a phone call; you’ll see 12 hours of guards going in basically check on him, come back. You’ll see nobody really comes out of that bay in that area than him.”

But what about his cell itself???

Why would Epstein even commit suicide? And who is to benefit the most from his death? In times past, key witnesses in cases brought against the FBI or high-ranking officials died under mysterious circumstances. 

EU Threatens Hungary Over LGBTQ Issues 

Breitbart wrote on May 30: 

“In response to recent legislation passed by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s conservative government to ban Pride parades in Hungary, over half of fellow European Union member states signed an open letter demanding that Budapest reverse course or face punishment from Brussels. The ‘declaration’ was signed by the countries of Austria, Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia, and Sweden… 

“Brussels and Budapest have long been at loggerheads over the issue, with Eurocrats previously criticising laws banning LGBTQ+ content from children’s television programmes… Currently, the EU Commission is withholding around €18 billion from Hungary over supposed violations of the ‘rule of law.’…”

The dictatorial conduct of the EU is becoming more and more blatant.

Erdogan Against the Gender Ideology 

C-Fam wrote on May 30: 

“‘The fight against LGBT perversion is also a fight for freedom, dignity, and the future of humanity,’ [Turkish President Recep Tayyip] Erdogan said… at the international Family Forum held on May 23 and 24. The conference was sponsored by Erdogan’s government and was attended by ministers from 27 countries from Africa, Asia, and the Balkans… Erdogan called gender ideology a ‘threat to humanity, women and children’ and a ‘national security threat.’ He pledged to work with everyone to protect the family and to fight the LGBT agenda domestically and abroad. 

“The conference addressed a full spectrum of policies to protect the family, including defending traditional man-woman marriage, incentives for young people to marry and found a family, how to raise fertility, and the effect of technology on the family. It also featured warnings against population control, abortion, gender ideology and harmful sexuality education that normalizes promiscuity as well as homosexual and transgender behavior… 

“He also said the LGBT agenda had become a system of ‘fascism and oppression’ and called gender ideology a form of child-abuse. In veiled criticism of the European Union, he denounced attacks against politicians in neighboring countries for defending marriage as the union of a man and a woman…” 

Turkey, unlike Hungary, is not a member of the EU, but it is a member of NATO. Will the EU dare to threaten Turkey as well?  

Canada’s Defense Deal With Europe 

The Toronto Star wrote on May 28: 

“Prime Minister Mark Carney said Tuesday that he wants a ‘concrete’ commitment by July 1 to partner with the European Union on a huge military industrial program, as he declared Canada must spend more on defence… Carney’s comments, in an interview with the CBC, came after King Charles III delivered the Liberal government’s throne speech in a show of Canadian sovereignty meant to highlight the country’s distinctiveness amidst a trade war and talk of annexation from American President Donald Trump. 

“The King’s speech said Canada will join ReArm Europe, the EU’s plan to spend hundreds of billions of dollars on defence over the next five years to ‘quickly and significantly’ boost the bloc of countries’ military strength…” 

Blow for Merz 

Deutsche Welle reported on June 4: 

“German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has defended his government’s effort to turn away asylum seekers at the country’s borders, one day after a court blocked the move. The emergency decision by the Berlin Administrative Court was a blow for Merz, who has promised he will curb irregular migration.

“Speaking in Berlin, the chancellor said the ruling may narrow his administration’s room for maneuver, but there was still scope… Shortly after taking office last month, Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt ordered police to beef up border checks and turn away irregular migrants, even if they apply for asylum. 

“The court ruling on Monday found that three Somalis who were turned back to Poland on May 9  should have been processed under the European Union’s Dublin Regulation for asylum cases. The court found that the government’s evidence to proclaim a ‘national emergency’ to justify the measure lacked sufficient evidence.

“Merz’s immigration policies have been repeatedly criticized as violating both German and EU law.” 

Government of the Netherlands Collapses

The Sun wrote on June 3:

“The Dutch government has collapsed after far-right leader Geert Wilders pulled his party from the coalition amid an asylum row… Wilders’ PVV party was the largest in the four-party coalition, which had been in place since July 2024… Former coalition partners have accused Wilders of engineering the crisis – and using asylum as cover to make a lunge for power. Earlier in the day, Wilders said he intended to become Prime Minister of the Netherlands… Wilders had demanded ten additional measures – including a freeze on asylum applications and halting the construction of reception centres…

“Any fresh election is unlikely to be held before October, and the formation of a new government traditionally tends to take months in the Netherlands…” 

Wilders Thanks Trump

Breitbart wrote on June 5:

“The Trump White House offered tacit support to Geert Wilders… President Trump has been clear on supporting European allies that work to protect sovereignty and national identity… Responding to this vote of confidence from President Trump, Mr Wilders wrote overnight: ‘Thank you [President Trump]… We will win the Dutch elections again and Make The Netherlands Great Again!’…

“Such an endorsement is no trivial matter as voters around the Western world fraction into pro- and anti-Trump camps… President Trump is due to be in the Netherlands before the forthcoming snap election, potentially offering an opportunity for him to show in-person support.”

Tusk’s Government Suffers Setback in Poland

Deutsche Welle wrote on June 2:

“Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk said he will request a vote of confidence in the near future. His centrist government suffered a setback [in its efforts to strengthen Warsaw’s pro-European orientation] after conservative nationalist Karol Nawrocki won the presidential election…

“Prime Minister Tusk’s governing coalition has sought to reverse the previous PiS government’s judicial reforms, which the European Union said undermined democracy and the rights of women and minorities. However, [outgoing President Andrzej Duda] blocked those efforts, and Nawrocki is expected to maintain this position. Supporters of Nawrocki view him as a champion of conservative values, including his strong anti-abortion stance…

“In the Polish political system, the prime minister, who is chosen by parliament, holds most day-to-day power. However, the president’s role is not merely ceremonial. The head of state can influence foreign policy and veto legislation… Nawrocki will succeed Duda, whose second and final term ends on August 6. According to the Polish constitution, the president serves a five-year term and may be re-elected once.” 

Von der Leyen Receives Charlemagne Prize Amid Criticism 

Brussels Signal wrote on May 30: 

“European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen received the Charlemagne Prize on May 29–leading to criticism from MEPs who called the award ‘in blatant contradiction to the fundamental values for which this prize was originally created’. 

“Spain’s King Felipe VI and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz both delivered remarks at an awards ceremony in Aachen town hall. The prize citation praised von der Leyen’s ‘visionary leadership’ in ‘guiding the EU through profound transformation with vision, courage, strength and foresight’. 

“However, German MEP [Member of European Parliament] Christine Anderson (Alternative for Germany, AfD) condemned the award, calling von der Leyen an ‘autocratic, power-drunk and corrupt’ politician who drove a wedge between citizens and the EU institutions. ‘Democracy, transparency, the rule of law, and international understanding have all been undermined under her watch,’ wrote Anderson in a letter to the Charlemagne Prize Board. 

“Anderson said the award was especially inappropriate after the Pfizergate scandal. A ruling by the European General Court affirmed von der Leyen acted wrongly by refusing to release messages in which she was accused of negotiating a multi-billion-euro vaccine deal via undisclosed text messages… 

“Another MEP, France’s Virginie Joron [National Rally, formerly National Front], said ‘the EU has overstepped its original mandate’ under von der Leyen. The legacy of EU founding father Robert Schuman was one of cooperation, not coercion, said Joron. 

“During her acceptance speech [in Aachen], Ursula von der Leyen sidestepped criticism while defending her legacy and pushing for a new European project calling for a 21st-century version of ‘Pax Europaea.’ She warned of a chaotic international order marked by ‘imperial ambitions,’ and urged Europe to rearm and reassert itself geopolitically. ‘A new international order will emerge in this decade… we must shape this new order… Our mission is European independence,’ she added.” 

Van der Leyen is no stranger to controversy, even during her tenure as Germany’s defense minister. 

Politico added on May 30: 

“The Commission chief received the Charlemagne award for ‘her services to the unity of the member states, in the containment of the pandemic, for the unity of the Union’s determination to defend itself against Russia — and for the impetus towards the Green Deal,’ the award’s board of directors said. 

“The prize is named after the Frankish king Charlemagne, who united much of Western and Central Europe under the Holy Roman Empire in the 9th century.” 

Especially rewarding her for “services in the containment of the pandemic” should be considered to be a major scandal, as her actions have done unspeakable harm to millions of people.

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News

Trump’s Latest Tariffs Debacle 

The Associated Press wrote on May 23: 

“President Donald Trump on Friday threatened 25% tariff on Apple unless iPhones are made in America as well as a 50% tax on all imports from the European Union [starting June 1]. [Trump said the talks with the EU were going nowhere].” 

The New York Post added on May 23: 

“In response, the Dow dropped 256 points in a volatile day… while luxury automaker Volvo warned that prices on cars are going to spike…   A warning to President Donald Trump: Everyone, including your friends, is starting to get a brutal case of tariff burnout… It’s one thing for your enemies to find you unpredictable, another for your friends to worry that you’re acting on pure whim. 

“All this uncertainty exacts a cost of its own, angst that builds with every surprise twist. Every day, folks are nervous… Americans are really tired of tariffs… Even fans of the president’s theater can get sick of endless drama. Trump clearly sees tariffs as a wonderful hammer, but not everything is a nail.” 

Bild Online wrote on May 24:

“In return, Trump is accepting punitive tariffs [of 50 percent] on [some] US exports to the EU. Because Brussels has no choice now.” 

Subsequently, it was reported that Trump delayed his 50% EU tariffs. Trump’s tariffs policy will contribute to America’s financial ruin and its political isolation. 

Trump’s Tariffs Rollercoaster

Reuters reported on May 29:

“A federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated the most sweeping of President Donald Trump’s tariffs, a day after a trade court had ruled Trump had exceeded his authority in imposing the duties and had ordered an immediate block on them. An order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington provided no opinion or reasoning but directed the plaintiffs in the case to respond by June 5 and the administration by June 9…

“Financial markets, which have whipsawed wildly in response to every twist and turn in Trump’s chaotic trade war, reacted with cautious optimism to the trade court ruling, though gains in stocks were largely limited by expectations that the court’s ruling faced a potentially lengthy appeals process. Indeed, analysts said broad uncertainty remained regarding the future of Trump’s tariffs, which have cost companies more than $34 billion in lost sales and higher costs…

“Emblematic of that uncertainty, a separate federal court earlier on Thursday had also found Trump overstepped his authority in using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act for what he called ‘reciprocal’ tariffs of at least 10% on goods from most U.S. trading partners and for the separate 25% levies on goods from Canada, Mexico and China related to fentanyl. That ruling was much narrower, however, and the relief order stopping the tariffs only applied to the toy company that brought the case.”

The three judges on the trade court who unanimously blocked the tariffs were Judge Timothy Reif, who was nominated by Mr. Trump; Judge Jane Restani, who was nominated by former President Ronald Reagan; and Judge Gary Katzmann, who was nominated by former President Obama. “We are living under a judicial tyranny,” White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller wrote in response to the ruling by the trade court, adding that “the judicial coup is out of control.”

European Airlines Freeze Travel to Major US Cities 

Travel and Tour World wrote on May 24: 

“European airlines are freezing their transatlantic growth and pulling back from major U.S. cities like New York, Miami, Los Angeles, and Chicago as they redirect flights to Canada, Mexico, Brazil and Caribbean, where bookings are rising and demand is outpacing the American market. Carriers including Lufthansa, British Airways, Air France, KLM, Iberia, and SAS have adjusted their summer schedules to reflect shifting traveler priorities, with more passengers opting for destinations that offer smoother entry, better seasonal deals, and fewer political complications. The changes mark a clear retreat from the U.S. at a time when international sentiment is cooling and alternative routes are proving far more profitable. 

“The decision to reduce flights is being driven by a sharp drop in bookings, rising concerns among European travelers about safety and border restrictions, and growing political discomfort tied to President Donald Trump’s second term. Airlines that had once expanded aggressively across the Atlantic are now turning their attention elsewhere. Internal forecasts, passenger surveys, and travel agency reports across Europe point to one conclusion: fewer people are planning trips to the United States this year… 

Lufthansa has quietly reduced frequencies on its routes to New York, Miami, and Chicago, three of the airline’s most important U.S. destinations… several weekly flights have been removed compared to last year…

British Airways has suspended service to Las Vegas and has reduced its operations to Orlando and Philadelphia… Air France has discontinued its Seattle route and trimmed service to Washington D.C. for the upcoming summer… KLM is cutting back flights to both San Francisco and Boston… Iberia has… reduced service between Madrid and Chicago… Scandinavian Airlines (SAS) has canceled its routes from Oslo to Newark and Copenhagen to Los Angeles… 

“… United Airlines has dropped its Newark–Tenerife service… Norse Atlantic Airways has pulled out of Miami–Oslo and Miami–Berlin… Lufthansa ended its Frankfurt–Minneapolis route on April 30… American Airlines suspended Miami–Paris… while KLM, Aer Lingus, and Iberia have all stepped back from routes including Miami–Amsterdam and Las Vegas–Dublin… 

“Behind the numbers is a growing sense among European travelers that visiting the United States has become more difficult. The return of tariff tensions between Washington and Brussels, renewed warnings at U.S. borders, and reports of increased security screening are all feeding into traveler hesitancy. Several European countries have updated their advisories for citizens planning to visit the U.S… In response, airlines are simply following the trend… for now, the skies between Europe and America are looking quieter.” 

Crazy! Meaning, that thanks to the Trump administration, the USA will suffer big time economically.

US-Japan Steel Deal

The Associated Press wrote on May 23:

“President Donald Trump said Friday that U.S. Steel will keep its headquarters in Pittsburgh as part of what he called a ‘planned partnership’ that seemed to signal that he’ll approve a bid by Japan-based Nippon Steel [of 15 billion] to make a big investment in the iconic American steelmaker, if not buy it outright.

“Still, Trump’s statement left it vague as to whether he is approving Nippon Steel’s bid after he vowed repeatedly to block the deal to prevent U.S. Steel from being foreign-owned. More recently, Trump suggested that Nippon Steel would invest in U.S. Steel, not buy it, and one union official suggested Friday that the federal government will have a role in the company’s management going forward. But investors seemed to take Trump’s statement as a sign that he’s approving some sort of merger, sharply pushing up U.S. Steel’s shares [by 21%], and the companies issued approving statements.” 

All of this seems to be in total contradiction to Trump’s previously declared goals for the USA. 

Musk Steps Down

 Newsmax wrote on May 29:

“Elon Musk is leaving his government role as a top adviser to President Donald Trump… Musk’s departure comes one day after he criticized the centerpiece of Trump’s legislative agenda, saying he was ‘disappointed; by what the president calls his ‘big beautiful bill.’… Musk’s concerns are shared by some Republican lawmakers…

“‘The federal bureaucracy situation is much worse than I realized,’ he told The Washington Post. ‘I thought there were problems, but it sure is an uphill battle trying to improve things in D.C., to say the least.’…”

Trump’s Fight Against Harvard

Breitbart wrote on May 23:

“A judge temporarily suspended Friday the Trump administration’s move to block Harvard from enrolling and hosting foreign students after the prestigious university sued, calling the action unconstitutional. On Thursday, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem revoked Harvard University’s ability to enroll foreign nationals, throwing the future of thousands of students and the lucrative income stream they provide into doubt. But Harvard sued, and Massachusetts district judge Allison Burroughs ordered that ‘The Trump administration is hereby enjoined from implementing… the revocation of Plaintiff’s SEVP (Student and Exchange Visitor Program) certification.’ There will be an injunction hearing on May 29, a court filing showed.

“President Donald Trump is furious at Harvard — which has produced 162 Nobel prize winners — for rejecting his demand that it submit to oversight on admissions and hiring over his claims that it is a hotbed of anti-Semitism and ‘woke’ liberal ideology…. The loss of foreign nationals — more than a quarter of its student body — could prove costly to Harvard, which charges tens of thousands of dollars a year in tuition… Noem had said Thursday that ‘this administration is holding Harvard accountable for fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus.’ Chinese students make up more than a fifth of Harvard’s international enrollment…” 

Newsmax added on May 23: 

“On Thursday, Noem said Harvard could restore its certification by turning over within 72 hours a raft of records about international students, including video or audio of their protest activity in the past five years.… Harvard called the revocation ‘unlawful many times over,’ saying the government violates the First Amendment by using coercion to police private speech, and forcing universities to surrender their academic freedom.” 

Breitbart added on May 26: 

“Harvard Law professor emeritus Laurence Tribe said Monday: ‘…This case involves Trump’s attempt to tell Harvard that it can no longer host foreign students. Now that’s crazy. There’s no legal basis for it. He’s talking about information that he would like about students. He wants to know details about what they say, what they think. That’s a violation of the First Amendment.’” 

The possible attack on freedom of speech is indeed ironic in light of the next article. 

USA vs. UK on Freedom of Speech 

Breitbart wrote on May 25: 

“The Trump administration reportedly dispatched a team to meet with victims of Britain’s draconian speech restrictions amid growing concerns over the state of liberty in the United Kingdom. A group of five diplomats from the U.S. State Department were recently sent on a fact-finding mission in March to Britain to meet with pro-life activists who have been arrested for silently praying outside abortion clinics in the UK…

“The Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) team also met with UK Foreign Office officials and members of the Ofcom broadcasting regulator, which was recently empowered to police speech on the internet in Britain by the controversial Online Safety Act. The legislation has reportedly become a major bone of contention between Washington and London, given the potential for the British authority to impose hefty fines on American social media firms for failing to police content on their platforms.

“The Trump administration has publicly chastised Britain for its increasingly restrictive speech codes, and reports have claimed that the issue could become a sticking point during trade negotiations…

“Reform UK leader and longtime Trump ally Nigel Farage remarked: ‘… My American friends cannot believe what is happening in the UK.’ During a February meeting in the Oval Office, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer denied that his country has a problem with free speech… According to a report last month from The Times of London, British police arrest more than 30 people every day for supposedly offensive comments on the internet or other platforms, totalling around 12,000 arrests per year.”

Censorship and restrictions on freedom and liberty everywhere…

Trump’s Major Blunder re South Africa

Express wrote on May 24:

“Donald Trump made a major blunder at the White House during his meeting with South Africa’s President Cyril Ramaphosa. The meeting turned confrontational after the US President presented his guest with alleged evidence of genocide committed against White South African farmers. In a moment that caught Ramaphosa and his delegation by surprise, Trump showed a screenshot of a video he claimed showed a mass grave of White farmers. ‘These are all white farmers that are being buried,’ Trump said as he glowered at his South African counterpart. However, the video – shot by Reuters – recorded the aftermath of an attack by a Rwanda-backed rebel paramilitary group in Congo.

“Published by the international news agency on February 3, the video showed humanitarian workers lifting body bags in the Congolese city of Goma. The image was pulled from footage of a mass burial following an M23 rebel assault on Goma, filmed by video journalist Djaffar Al Katanty. Al Katanty was stunned to see his video used during the meeting. ‘In view of all the world, President Trump used my image, used what I filmed in DRC to try to convince President Ramaphosa that in his country, White people are being killed by Black people,’ he said. However, a BBC report identified the crosses as part of a memorial to a couple who were killed in 2020

“While South Africa has one of the highest murder rates in the world, most of the victims are Black. Of the more than 26,000 murders committed in 2024, eight of those were of farmers, according to South African Police Service (SAPS) figures.”

Whether or not there is genocide against white farmers in South Africa, the incompetence with which the Trump administration presented its case is shocking and embarrassing. 

US Bishops vs. Trump on Immigration 

Newsmax wrote on May 24: 

“The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) is on a collision course with the Trump administration over competing views on immigration and the role the government should play in caring for at-risk migrants…  This USCCB chastised the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) for rescinding a policy that gave guidance on the care, custody and documentation of pregnant women they encounter. 

“Bishop Mark J. Seitz, of El Paso, Texas, chairman of the USCCB Committee on Migration wrote, ‘It is deeply troubling and inexcusable that measures intended to ensure the basic safety of pregnant mothers and their young children while in government custody could be rescinded with such indifference toward the vulnerability of those involved… This decision is all the more concerning as the [Trump] administration simultaneously ramps up family detention in place of safer, more cost-effective alternatives to detention,’ Seitz said. 

“‘Let us be clear: protecting pregnant mothers and their children can never be considered “obsolete.” This principle irrefutably extends to noncitizens in immigration detention, each of whom possesses an inviolable, God-given dignity that must be respected. We urge the Administration to reissue guidance that adequately reflects and affirms the increased standard of care due to this vulnerable population while in government custody,’ he added. 

“Time will tell how much a of conflict the Catholic church generally and Pope Leo XIV specifically will have with the Trump administration over the issue of illegal immigration… Although he has yet to address the issue publicly, Pope Leo’s brother John Prevost told the New York Times, ‘I know he’s not happy with what’s going on with immigration. I know that for a fact. How far he’ll go with it is only one’s guess, but he won’t just sit back. I don’t think he’ll be the silent one.’” 

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops is correct in this case. 

Catholic Sacrament of Confession Under Attack

The Blaze wrote on May 22: 

“Washington State Senate Bill 5375, passed earlier this month… would force Catholic priests who hear admissions of abuse within the context of the sacrament of confession to break the seal of the sacrament and report those admissions to the state, even though all other recognized privileges — like those between doctor and patient and lawyer and client — are preserved… 

“The practice of confession [is] a sacrament where we believe God extends His forgiveness for our sins, which we must lay out to a priest, Christ’s representative on earth. It’s a ritual: You list your sins in conversation with a priest, often anonymously or from behind a screen, and in return, the priest assigns a penance and grants absolution. It’s also a ritual critical to the spiritual life of Catholics. Without forgiveness and absolution, Catholics who die in a state of sin could go straight to hell, and Catholics who live in a state of mortal sin are barred from communion, which is the heart of our faith… 

“Priests who are found to be uncompliant could face a year in jail or thousands of dollars in fines… And priests who do comply would face excommunication… because the issue of confessional confidentiality is covered right there in the Church’s own catechism… 

“In a statement issued May 5, [the Trump administration] vowed to fight the Washington law on the grounds that it violates the First Amendment’s right to free exercise since it infringes on a core, sincerely held religious dogma…”

Confession (even though not biblical) is at the heart and core of the Catholic Church’s teaching. It will never abrogate that “sacrament.”

America.. the Fading Empire 

The Ron Paul Institute wrote on May 23: 

“The inexorable decline of the American Empire has arrived at an Imperial Paradox. It must either fight a war and die, or not fight a war and yet still die… 

“The Pentagon must understand it cannot sustain logistics in a war against China in the western Pacific. It simply cannot be done… 

“In the context of a war against Iran, all the geography is against the US… The US Navy could only operate at extreme risk in the southern Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden, the Gulf of Oman, the Strait of Hormuz, and the Persian Gulf. Every US base in the region is well within range of Iranian missile strikes… 

“From a geographic and logistical standpoint, the only remotely conceivable war is one in Ukraine against Russia. The US at least has bases and forces already in place in the UK, Germany, Poland, Romania, Finland… Of course, whether or not such a condition persists long in a war scenario is another question altogether… 

“So if you’re an empire that thinks it needs a war to reaffirm at least its short-term relevance and fading glory … well, these are your choices. Sic transit gloria mundi.”

Thus passes the glory of the world… 

Germany to Defend Europe 

Bloomberg wrote on May 22: 

“As Europe waits anxiously for US President Donald Trump’s possible rollback of security commitments in Ukraine’s war against Russia, Germany wants to play more of a leading role. Speaking in Lithuania yesterday, Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Germany’s military is prepared to defend the Baltic region against ‘any threat.’ The new German leader and his defense minister, Boris Pistorius, traveled to Vilnius to take part in the first ceremonial roll call of the Panzer Brigade 45 [Germany’s biggest foreign military mission since World War II.]”

“Since taking office earlier this year, the center-right chancellor has pledged to transform the German military into Europe’s strongest army. G-7 finance ministers meanwhile agreed to continue supporting Ukraine as it attempts to keep Russia at bay. For its part, the EU is also giving its dedicated defense fund a 40 million Euro boast.” 

The Draft to Return to Germany? 

Deutsche Welle reported on May 24: 

“Germany is considering bringing back military conscription from next year unless more volunteers sign up for the armed forces, German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius has said… The initial plan to boost numbers will rely on volunteers, but Pistorius warned that could change if numbers remain insufficient. Compulsory military service was scrapped in 2011… 

“‘If the time comes when we have more capacity available than voluntary registrations, then a decision may be made to make recruitment mandatory. That is the roadmap,’ he added…” 

It will come… sadly. 

Sebastian Kurz Acquitted 

Deutsche Welle wrote on May 26: 

“An Austrian court on Monday overturned former Chancellor Sebastian Kurz’s conviction for giving false testimony to a parliamentary inquiry. ‘Sebastian Kurz… is acquitted,’ a three-member panel of judges said… 

“Kurz was found guilty of making false statements in February 2024 and was given an eight-month suspended sentence, a conviction he then appealed. In his appeal, Kurz argued that he was interrupted during his testimony and that the judge who handed out his conviction was biased…

“Kurz is still under investigation for corruption in a separate case. Prosecutors suspect him of embezzling state funds, diverting them to polls distorted to boost his popularity.”

Ukraine Unstable Country

EurAsia Daily wrote on May 23: 

“The readiness of the European Union to maintain a Ukrainian army of one million people poses a threat to the security of the EU countries themselves, since Ukraine is an unstable state. This was stated by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban…  ‘Ukraine is a politically unstable state, and no one can say what kind of government there will be,’ he warned. 

“Accordingly, there are no guarantees that Ukraine, and therefore its armed forces, will take a friendly position towards the EU countries. Therefore, Orban stressed that the financing by the European Union of the million-strong Ukrainian army at the suggestion of Kiev creates a ‘serious threat to European security.’ 

“… the Government of Hungary from the very beginning of the conflict on Ukraine refused to supply weapons there and opposed the provision of military assistance to it. Budapest condemned Moscow’s actions, but at the same time always stressed that the Ukrainian conflict cannot be resolved on the battlefield, it should be settled through negotiations.”

Ukraine and Russia WILL become allies against Europe. 

What Happened During the Phone Call With Trump

Focus wrote on May 24: 

“The week began with a shock for Europe. After his phone call with Russian leader Vladimir Putin, [Trump] dropped the bombshell in a conversation with the European heads of state: The US is no longer interested in acting as peace mediator. And sanctions against Putin, which Trump had previously promised, were suddenly off the table. The German magazine ‘Der Spiegel’ has now reconstructed what really happened in the shock phone call between Trump and the Europeans (Friedrich Merz, Emmanuel Macron, Volodymyr Zelensky, Giorgia Meloni, Ursula von der Leyen, and Alexander Stubb)…

“The Europeans had hoped that Trump would read Putin the riot act during their phone call. Trump, who recently said that Putin might just be leading him on, is supposed to reinforce the new sanctions threats, according to the Europeans’ wishes. But Trump has none of that. Instead, according to ‘Spiegel,’ Trump says Putin doesn’t want a deal. And Ukraine is now the Europeans’ problem. Sanctions, ceasefire, not a word about that. 

“The Europeans know immediately: As before, Putin has lulled Trump into a false sense of security. As several media outlets report, there is a very long silence afterward. And all Europeans ask themselves: How can we keep Trump in this process? And above all: Who of us? 

“In the end, it is Friedrich Merz who takes the floor. As ‘Der Spiegel’ reports, citing diplomats and government circles, he says he wants to ‘summarize’ the situation. Merz says technical talks must now begin. The Chancellor also says that the Vatican could host such talks, as Trump suggested. Trump’s reaction: ‘Fine by me.’ Merz subsequently asked twice whether Trump was really part of it. It would be nothing new for Trump to suddenly back down. But the US President promises to send his special envoy on this matter…

“It is the absolute minimum success on a shocking day for Europe. Friedrich Merz himself threatened Putin with harsh consequences if there would be no ceasefire. He had believed he had the agreed-upon backing of Donald Trump. But he abandoned him again, just like he abandoned Ukraine.” 

America’s Betrayal of Europe 

news.de wrote on May 25:

“Ben Hodges is shocked by Donald Trump’s behavior in the Ukraine war. The former US general [who commanded the US Army in Europe] speaks in a recent interview about the US president’s betrayal of his allies and simultaneously revealed Vladimir Putin’s true war aim… ‘After all the loud talk about solving the problem in 24 hours, I think the credibility of this president and this administration will be severely damaged by this failure.’ 

“And further: ‘If the US turns away and says, “Hey, Europe, this is your problem!” I think that would be a real betrayal of our allies who have stood by us for decades… Russia has never changed its war aims. It’s still about the destruction of Ukraine and the idea of ​​Ukraine as a state’… 

“However, he is also convinced that Putin’s goals are much bigger than Ukraine. ‘Russia’s goal is to break NATO… And they achieve that by attacking a NATO country to see if we all respond appropriately. And if not, then I think it’s the end of the alliance,’ said Hodges…” 

Russia’s Demands 

Bild Online wrote on May 24: 

“Another setback for any hopes of peace in Ukraine in the near future. Vladimir Putin’s (72) regime now refuses to sign any peace agreement with Ukraine as long as the democratically elected Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy (47) remains in office.” 

Trump: “Putin Absolutely Crazy!” 

Newsmax wrote on May 26: 

“President Donald Trump used his social media platform to take aim at Vladimir Putin, calling the Russian president ‘absolutely crazy’ for continuing to fire missiles that are killing Ukrainian citizens. Trump also criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for saying things that help undermine the U.S. president’s efforts to end the Russia-Ukraine war. 

“‘I’ve always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin of Russia, but something has happened to him. He has gone absolutely CRAZY!… He is needlessly killing a lot of people, and I’m not just talking about soldiers. Missiles and drones are being shot into Cities in Ukraine, for no reason whatsoever. I’ve always said that he wants ALL of Ukraine, not just a piece of it, and maybe that’s proving to be right, but if he does, it will lead to the downfall of Russia!…’ 

“Earlier Sunday, Trump expressed deep unhappiness at Russia’s weekend bombing of Ukraine, saying of the Russian president, ‘I’m not happy with Putin… I don’t know what’s wrong with him. What the hell happened to him? Right? He’s killing a lot of people. I’m not happy about that,’ Trump told reporters at the airport in Morristown, New Jersey, as he prepared to return to Washington. 

“Trump spoke in reaction to a Russian barrage of 367 drones and missiles at Ukrainian cities overnight on Sunday, including the capital Kyiv, in the largest aerial attack of the war so far, killing at least 12 people and injuring dozens more.” 

Trump added on May 27: “What Vladimir Putin doesn’t realize is that if it weren’t for me, lots of really bad things would have already happened to Russia, and I mean REALLY BAD. He’s playing with fire!”

Trump also announced now that there will be sanctions against Russia. Russia responded by saying that Trump is suffering from “emotional overload.”  

Now, when did Trump ever say that Putin wants all of Ukraine? If Russia and Ukraine unite, that will not lead to the immediate downfall of Russia. That downfall will come later. 

Germany and Ukraine 

The Guardian wrote on May 28: 

“German chancellor Friedrich Merz said Wednesday during a visit by Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy that Berlin will help Kyiv develop new long-range weapons that can hit targets in Russian territory… 

“The production of long-range weapons ‘can take place both in Ukraine and here in Germany,’ he said… Germany will provide further military support for Ukraine amounting to about €5bn ($5.65bn)…” 

The New York Post added on May 28: 

“Merz said last Monday that Germany and other major allies were no longer imposing range limits on weapons they send to Ukraine, although he indicated their use was limited to Russian military targets…” 

Israel’s Standing 

Israel Today wrote on May 23:

“Nearly 600 days after the outbreak of the October 7 war, and Israel has sunk to an all-time low in its international standing. Some of its closest allies—Britain, France, and Canada—have threatened sanctions if the war in Gaza continues. Never before has such a harshly worded statement been directed at Israel, effectively branding it a pariah state… 

“Most astonishing and alarming is the silence of the United States, Israel’s steadfast ally that has always stood by its side. Not a single word of condemnation from Washington regarding this threatening statement from other Western powers. If President Donald Trump was accused of throwing Israel under the bus, this is now taking tangible form on the global stage…” 

And so, Israel will end up all alone. 

US Demands of Israel to Delay Gaza Takeover 

Newsmax wrote on May 25:

“Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed a full-fledged takeover of Gaza from Hamas terrorists, but the U.S. is pushing to delay that until the remaining hostages are returned, effectively giving the terrorists justification for their holding of what Israel has called its ‘human shields.’… 

“Netanyahu has pledged to hold all areas under full Israel control to accomplish the long-stated war goals: 1. Return all hostages. 2. Destroy Hamas in total. 3. Deradicalize and demilitarize Gaza.

Netanyahu’s regime contends that third goal can only be accomplished with Israel’s occupation of Gaza to root out radical anti-Israel extremism that led to the Oct. 7, 2023, terrorist attack.

The security situation in Gaza remains tenuous without a controlling force, under Israel’s view. 

“Not only are Hamas terrorists reportedly looting the humanitarian aid for the innocent civilians, but they are also reportedly firing on civilians trying to access the aid that the world leaders have demanded Israel release. Israel has long warned aid is getting stolen by the very hostage-holding terrorists Israel seeks to remove from power…” 

How much longer does Trump want to delay this? Admittedly, one has to note that Trump’s foreign policy has been pretty unsuccessful so far. 

Houthi Continue to Attack Israel 

Breitbart wrote on May 25: 

“The Iranian-backed Houthi rebels have stepped up their attacks on Israel, firing three ballistic missiles in the last four days. Though all were intercepted by missile defenses, the pace of the attacks is a notable escalation. Moreover, the attacks have come despite a Houthi ceasefire with the United States; ongoing talks between the U.S. and Iran on a possible nuclear deal; and Israeli reprisals at Yemen’s Hodeidah port and Sanaa airport… 

“Both President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have said in the past that Iran is ultimately responsible for Houthi attacks. Israel could conceivably use that as justification to attack Iran. However, that would risk interfering in the ongoing diplomatic effort between the U.S. and Iran — an effort that is not making much progress, given that Iran refuses to accede to demands to stop enriching uranium.”

Breitbart wrote on May 28:

“The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) responded to days of missile attacks by the Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen on Wednesday, targeting the Sanaa airport and destroying the Houthis’ last serviceable airplane… The other planes were destroyed in an Israeli strike on the airport on May 6… It is unclear whether, or when, Israel will target Iran in response to Houthi attacks, though Netanyahu keeps raising the possibility…” 

Friedrich Merz Criticizes Israel 

Deutsche Welle wrote on May 26: 

“German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Monday that Israel’s ‘current level of attacks on Gaza can no longer be justified by the fight against Hamas.’ ‘Harming the civilian population to such an extent, as has increasingly been the case in recent days, can no longer be justified as a fight against Hamas terrorism,’ he told German public broadcaster WDR in a televised interview.  

“He added he planned to hold a call with Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu this week to tell him ‘to not overdo it,’ though for ‘historical reasons,’ Germany would always be more guarded in its criticism than some European partners. ‘But if lines are crossed, where international humanitarian law is really being violated, then Germany, the German chancellor, must also say something about it,’ Merz said.” 

The Lying Press and Hatred Against Israel 

Report 24 wrote on May 25: 

“The mainstream media bombards the public with images of children with wide, pleading eyes… Instead of demanding evidence or sources, hatred against Israel is sweeping through the country… Ever since the Middle East conflict began, there have been countless lies emanating from the machinery of the so-called ‘Palestinians’ and their ‘National Authority’… 

“On May 20, UN Emergency Relief Coordinator Tom Fletcher, via the formerly highly respected BBC, claimed that 14,000 babies in Gaza were at risk of dying within 48 hours… Tom Fletcher had fabricated the story. There is no truth to it. And the BBC failed to question it or classify it. Israel has been exposed to the hatred of the world. This doesn’t happen by chance—it’s a calculated move. Of course, the ORF [in Austria] also participated in the unreflective spread of this lie… 

“The wrongly accused Jews once again had to do their own research to find out the background to the story. It was discovered that Fletcher was referring to a report by the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), which estimated that up to 14,000 children between 6 months and 6 years of age could be affected by malnutrition over a period of one year… There were no current threats of death within 48 hours… 

“A high-ranking UN official went public with a fact that, upon closer examination, feeds the centuries-old antisemitic narratives that have led to pogroms, i.e., mass murder and expulsion, in many places. The ritual murder legend of the Jew as baby murderer. First historically documented in 1144 in England, when Jews were accused, without any evidence, of murdering a Christian boy. In 1475, a two-year-old boy was found dead in Trento. The authorities subsequently had all the city’s Jews tortured and executed. The image of the child-murdering Jews was taken up by Nazi propaganda… 

“We live in a time in which leftists, Muslims, and National Socialists are fraternizing to incite hatred against Israel and attack Jews. Yet, every lie seems to be justified. As a media consumer, one should have learned, at the very latest after the madness of the Corona period, to question everything critically… Anyone who relies on mainstream media is abandoned. Not just during the Corona pandemic, but always…”

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News

Trump’s Phone Conversation With Putin 

Deutsche Welle wrote on May 19: 

“US President Donald Trump says talks between Russia and Ukraine to end the war would start ‘immediately.’ In a post on his Truth Social, Trump said his call with Russian President Vladimir Putin went ‘very well.’… Putin described the conversation with Trump as ‘frank and meaningful.’…  

“Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has rejected Russian demands to withdraw Ukrainian forces from key regions in the east and south of the country claimed by Moscow… Russia has made it a condition for ending its war in Ukraine… [Zelenskyy] told reporters that he emphasized to US President Donald Trump that no decisions should be made about Ukraine without involving Kyiv… He spoke with Trump before and after the US president held a phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin.” 

The New York Post wrote on May 19:

“[Putin] doubled down Monday on not accepting a cease-fire… following a two-hour call with President Trump — saying that Moscow was not ready for peace until the ‘root cause’ of the ‘crisis’ is addressed.” 

Trump’s “happy spin” can’t ignore the fact that the phone call did not accomplish anything. He stressed that Russia wants to become trading partners with the US — and made no mention of secondary sanctions, which the Europeans are determined to impose (note article below). 

Victory for Putin 

Die Welt wrote on May 19: 

“Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke with his US counterpart Donald Trump for two hours. There was no sign of Trump’s criticism of the Russians’ behavior in Ukraine. Putin can count the day a victory… For Putin, this means, on the one hand, he can continue fighting until a ceasefire is agreed upon – and with Trump’s tacit approval. Previously, some of Trump’s reactions to Russian attacks on residential buildings in Kyiv had caused irritation in Moscow. Now Moscow has nothing to justify itself for. 

“Trump failed to criticize the largest Russian drone attack on Ukraine since the war began on Sunday night. On the other hand, [Putin] can set conditions for the ceasefire alone… 

“The pressure on the Europeans is now increasing. The recently signaled transatlantic unity is over faster than it began.”

Bild Online wrote on May 19:

“If Putin’s statement is to be believed, the talks with Trump ended WITHOUT any concrete results. Russia is unwilling to fulfill Trump’s most important demand, an immediate 30-day ceasefire… That means: nothing will happen immediately. Putin will continue bombing Ukraine… This makes it clear: Putin once again turned down the most powerful man in the world.” 

As was to be expected, Trump lost again… while Putin was playing him like a fiddle. This was SO predictable. Note the following articles below which had been published prior to the phone conversation between Putin and Trump.

Putin Warns Trump 

The Daily Mail wrote on May 18: 

“Russian state TV aired a video of Vladimir Putin warning Donald Trump to stop trying to dictate the terms of a ceasefire with Ukraine. Putin stressed that he plans to finish what he started three years ago and warned that Trump should not push him into a US blueprint for stopping the war…. 

“Putin’s words were recorded in late March but broadcast today after Trump made clear he wants the Russian leader to concede a ceasefire… ‘We have enough strength and resources to bring what was started in 2022 to its logical conclusion with the result that Russia needs,’ Putin added.” 

This does not look like Putin is REALLY interested in a lasting peace agreement which can be secured and guaranteed. 

Trump Got It All Wrong 

The New York Post wrote on May 19:

“It was never going to be easy for President Trump to bring an end to the Ukraine war, but it’s even harder when he’s operating under an erroneous theory of the conflict. The man who instigated the war and who is the chief obstacle to peace is Vladimir Putin. Yet this enemy of the West, murderer of dissidents, and serial perpetrator of wars of territorial aggrandizement has never been subjected to the same US pressure campaign as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, whose fundamental offense is to be leading a country that his larger neighbor wants to subjugate… Putin, in contrast, has been at the receiving end of an all-carrots approach, and has reacted accordingly. 

“Pretty much whatever Putin does, Trump says someone else would do the same in his circumstances… 

“The play for the Kremlin is obvious here. It wants to keep inching ahead with territorial gains in the war, and if it continues to string along negotiations, has to hope that Trump tires of the whole thing and cuts off US aid to Ukraine. That would reward [Putin] with a very important diplomatic victory — a split between the US and Europe — and a chance to make major advances against an increasingly hard-pressed Ukraine…

“Whatever you think of the policy of NATO expansion, Ukraine didn’t invade Russia, and Putin has made it clear that Ukraine’s existence as its own independently governed nation is at the root of his war. So long as Putin believes that he’s winning and holds ‘all of the cards,’ there’s no reason for him to become more pliable… Putin has every reason to think he can persevere when the world’s superpower is inclined to blame the victim of his unprovoked aggression.” 

German Foreign Policy and the Dubious Trump 

Bild Online published the following commentary on May 15: 

“If Chancellor Friedrich Merz believed in Kyiv this weekend that the Europeans had Donald Trump (78) back on their side with the spontaneous call from Emmanuel Macron (47) and the prearranged statement, then he must now realize: No, Trump is continuing as before

Trump’s statement today, after Russian dictator Vladimir Putin canceled the meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, is devastating. Trump isn’t even gently criticizing the Russian president; he even understands his cancellation. The Kremlin must be laughing its head off… 

“If Merz cannot announce tough sanctions together with the US (for example, on oil and gas)…, that would be his first major embarrassment as Chancellor… 

“But Vice Chancellor Klingbeil also has a problem. The CDU/CSU and SPD had announced that they did NOT want to discuss arms deliveries in order to keep Putin in the dark. Just a few days after Merz reiterated this position regarding Taurus cruise missiles… Klingbeil’s parliamentary group leader, Mattias Miersch, showed that he couldn’t care less about the Chancellor’s words. Miersch publicly stated that he was AGAINST Taurus deliveries… Why? So that Putin knows exactly, shortly before possible negotiations, that he can rely on the SPD?… 

“Foreign policy is already becoming the biggest test for Merz and Klingbeil.” 

New European Sanctions Against Russia

Express wrote on May 16:

“European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen criticized Vladimir Putin for his lack of presence at the peace talks with Ukraine on Thursday in Istanbul, Turkey, stating that it demonstrates Putin’s disinterest in peace. President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had urged Putin to personally engage in peace talks with Zelensky regarding the ongoing three-year conflict, but Putin dispatched lower-level delegates instead, which many interpreted as an indication that Putin is indifferent to peace. Consequently, Zelensky also opted to send lower-ranking officials, with von der Leyen indicating that the EU is now compelled to impose further sanctions on Russia due to Putin’s actions….

“‘… [The] new package of sanctions… will include for example sanctions on Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2. It will include working on listing more vessels of the Russian shadow fleet and also lowering the oil price cap, and it will include more sanctions on the financial sector in Russia,’ she detailed.” 

It will remain to be seen whether Europe is going to go through with this without the USA. 

New Sanctions 

Deutsche Welle wrote on May 20: 

“The EU on Tuesday approved its 17th round of sanctions on Russia, the bloc’s top diplomat Kaja Kallas announced at a meeting of foreign and defense ministers in Brussels. The new measures target the nearly 200 ships of Russia’s so-called ‘shadow fleet.’ These ships are used to help Russia evade oil sales restrictions, and are often dilapidated, uninsured, with unclear ownership. 

Kallas added that more Russia sanctions are ‘in the works… The longer Russia wages war, the tougher our response,’ she added. .. 

“Kaja Kallas… called for the United States to take ‘strong action’ against Russia if ceasefire talks do not come to fruition. ‘America said that if Russia doesn’t agree on an unconditional ceasefire, then there are going to be consequences. So, we want to see those consequences, also from the US side,’ Kallas said… 

The UK on Tuesday said new sanctions would target Russia’s military, energy and financial sectors, coming as the EU also adopted a new raft of sanctions. The UK Foreign Office said the dual sanctions were part of ‘a coordinated effort to secure a just and lasting peace in Ukraine.’”

Already: Merz in a Bind 

Focus wrote on May 16: 

“Politicians should always set the bar so high that they can just barely fit under it. For the tall Friedrich Merz, this advice, given half a century ago by Franz Josef Strauss, is difficult to follow. And Merz promptly broke in his first week in government – his own bar. 

“The resounding failure of the Russia-Ukraine negotiations in Istanbul after 90 minutes, the demonstrative departure of the delegations from the negotiating room, does not fit at all with the images of that conspiratorial gang of four a few days ago. They showed a standing Friedrich Merz in a light blue sweater, clearly briefing his counterparts from France, Poland, and Great Britain on his way to Kyiv about his actions in Ukraine. 

“A 30-day ceasefire as a prelude to serious peace negotiations was the demand of the united leading Europeans who had been working with the new Chancellor from Germany who should have been looked upon as a new leader… Merz remained vague. A tough chancellor would have sounded different… Merz suffered his first bitter foreign policy defeat. Annalena Baerbock couldn’t have done better, and Merz must realize that the international stage wasn’t waiting for this German.” 

Perhaps not for Merz… 

The Most Important American 

ntv wrote on May 18: 

“Trump is no longer the most important American in the world, that’s now Robert Francis Prevost. The headline in the New York Times sums it up. Pope Leo XIV has already won the sympathy of Trump’s critics – as a 100 percent antithesis to the US President… There were only doubts as to whether, after the Jesuit Bergoglio, it would be another person of a religious order, the first Augustinian ever in the history of the Church… 

“Of course, this Pope also carries the burdens of the Catholic Church: Half of humanity is women, but they have no say in his election or in his Church. Pope Leo XIV will also have to address the many cases of abuse by clergymen of their wards, minors, women, and men in the Church… 

A harsher political antithesis to Trumpism is hard to imagine. The US President may have many Catholic voters, but he doesn’t have the Church…” 

The Pope’s Vision of the “Unity of Faith” 

Vatican News reported on May 19: 

“Speaking first to other Christian Churches and ecclesial communities, Pope Leo XIV took note of the 1,700th anniversary of the Council of Nicea, emphasizing that unity among Christians ‘can only be unity in faith.’…

“Turning to representatives of non-Christian religious traditions, Pope Leo XIV said our ‘common path’ can and must be understood to involve everyone, ‘in a spirit of human fraternity.’ 

The Council of Nicea decided dogmatically that God is a Trinity–  three co-equal and co-eternal Persons. All who disagreed were declared “anathema” (“cursed”) from  Christ and excluded from fellowship. Pope Leo’s somewhat inconsistent statements are interesting: “Unity among Christians can only be united in faith” seems to be saying what the Council of Nicea decreed with its consequences for “heretics,” while non-Christians seem to be given some time in reaching a “common path,” until the “unity of faith” must be encompassing them as well? 

Please view our new StandingWatch program, titled, “Pope Leo’s Demand of ‘Unity in Faith!’” 

Trump’s Goals Are Crystal Clear 

Focus wrote on May 18:

“Trump’s policies are so consistent that the surprise in the liberal part of the West can only be explained by self-deception. Yet the US President’s goals are crystal clear. 

“The truly astonishing thing about Donald Trump’s policies is that they still astonish so many. The headlines express shock and disbelief whenever Trump once again shakes a cornerstone of the liberal world order – whether by endorsing Russia’s claim to Ukrainian territory, bringing up the forcible annexation of Greenland, or triggering economic chaos with tariff announcements.” 

Supreme Court Stops Trump 

CNBC wrote on May 16: 

“The Supreme Court on Friday granted a request by Venezuelan nationals seeking to block their removal from the United States under the Alien Enemies Act.  In a 7-2 decision, the court said the Trump administration had not given the detainees enough time or adequate resources to challenge their deportations. ‘Under these circumstances, notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster,’ the ruling said. 

“The justices barred the removal of the men, who the Trump administration alleges are members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, pending a new decision from a lower federal appellate court… The justices did not rule on whether the Alien Enemies Act, which the Trump administration invoked in mid-April to deport the detainees, had been applied correctly. ‘To be clear, we decide today only that the detainees are entitled to more notice than was given on April 18,’ their ruling said… 

“Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented from the opinion.” 

Trump raged against the order. 

Suspending Habeas Corpus? 

The Ron Paul Institute published the following article by Judge Andrew P. Napolitano on May 15: 

“What if the writ of habeas corpus has been guaranteed to the British since 1215 and to Americans since 1789? What if this encompasses the right of every person who is confined by the government against his or her will to compel the jailer to justify the confinement before a neutral judge? 

“What if this right is personal and individual and applies to all persons at all times? What if the right can be exercised by anyone who is arrested… What if this right — to be free from an unjust confinement; to be free from arrest without trial — is one for which the Founders and the Framers fought the American Revolution

“What if habeas corpus is today recognized by all judges in the United States? What if judges actually stop court proceedings when a habeas corpus petition is received in order to hold a hearing and compel the government to lay out the evidence against the accused and justify his or her confinement, lest he or she spend one minute more behind bars than is lawful

“… What if even the most tyrannical and absolute of monarchs in Britain recognized and respected habeas corpus for their subjects in Britain?… 

“What if Madison recognized that in cases of invasion or rebellion, Congress might want to suspend habeas corpus until the rebellion or invasion subsided? What if Congress — in order to prevent frivolous or politically based suspensions of the right — defined invasion or rebellion as a state of affairs of such calamity that the federal courts are unable to conduct proceedings

“What if Abraham Lincoln suspended habeas corpus during the War Between the States in certain regions in the north so he could arrest his critics without trial? What if the Supreme Court ruled that under the plain meaning and recognized structure of the Constitution, only Congress — not the president — can suspend habeas corpus?… 

“What if Franklin D. Roosevelt did the same based on race during World War II and he claimed he did so based not on invasion or rebellion but on the fear of invasion or rebellion? What if — in one of its lowest moral rulings in history, at a time of anti-Japanese racial animosity in America — the court permitted the suspension? 

“What if subsequent Congresses and presidents and courts condemned this ruling and this suspension? What if Congress — 40 years later — compensated those still living and their offspring for these arrests without trial? 

“What if George W. Bush tried to suspend habeas corpus in the months following 9/11?… What if the Supreme Court ruled against him? What if Congress tried to implement arrest without trial and the Supreme Court ruled that there was no invasion or rebellion of such chaotic magnitude that the federal courts could not conduct proceedings, and so it invalidated the suspension of habeas corpus

What if here we go again? What if the White House (Stephen Miller) announced last week that it—not Congress—is contemplating the suspension of habeas corpus, but only for certain persons?…” 

What if we never learn from history? 

Walmart Buckles… Somewhat 

Fox Business reported on May 18: 

“Walmart is going to absorb the cost of some tariffs, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Sunday after speaking with the company’s CEO in the wake of President Donald Trump’s warning that the retail giant should ‘eat the tariffs.’… 

“On Thursday, [CEO Doug] McMillion said Walmart would do its best to keep prices down, but with the ‘magnitude’ of the tariffs, ‘even at the reduced levels announced this week, we aren’t able to absorb all the pressure given the reality of narrow retail margins.’” 

One wonders what was going on behind the scenes. 

Strong Accusations by Rand Paul Against Trump 

Politico wrote on May 18: 

“Sen. Rand Paul attacked the economic logic of President Donald Trump’s aggressive tariff strategy on Sunday… 

“The Kentucky Republican said Trump’s sweeping tariffs on foreign trading partners are based on ‘an economic fallacy’ about trade deficits… 

“‘Well, tariffs are taxes, and when you put a tax on a business, it’s always passed through as a cost. So, there will be higher prices,’ Paul said…

“Courts have previously upheld the legality of tariffs when they’re based on congressional authority. However, Trump’s decision to impose tariffs by himself has raised legal questions about whether he is exceeding his delegated power. ‘Now, we do have a long history, though, of both parties abdicating their responsibility on tariffs and granting power to Congress, which brings up another constitutional question, can Congress delegate powers given to it under the Constitution to the president?’ Paul said.” 

Interesting legal questions indeed… 

Jeffrey Epstein Committed Suicide? Hardly! 

Financial Express wrote on May 20: 

“Hoping to finally move past convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s death, the FBI gave its verdict on the case. Declaring the sex offender’s 2019 death inside the notorious Metropolitan Correctional Centre a suicide, Deputy Director Dan Bongino (alongside FBI Director Kash Patel) that there was no evidence to prove any foul play being at work… [Epstein’s] brother, Mark Epstein, has since slammed the suicide verdict. Speaking to the Daily Mail, he fumed over Patel having ‘no idea what… he’s talking about,’ as he ‘wasn’t there, he didn’t see the body, he didn’t see the autopsy.’.. 

“He admitted that it would be a lot easier for him to move on as well if he accepted his brother’s death as suicide. Suggesting that there was a ‘long list of things’ that serve as bombshell evidence of Jeffrey Epstein having been murdered in his prison cell. And so, Mark is among the many who are cynical of the FBI’s declaration… Standing his ground, Mark alleged that there was good reason for people wanting his brother dead, especially for ‘what he knew, what he had on people.’ … 

“While Jeffrey’s file states that he was discovered hanging by a bedsheet, Mark Epstein said, ‘I don’t think that sheet could have held his weight, it would have torn.’.. In light of the two cameras trained on Epstein’s cell experiencing technical issues, Mark went on to say, ‘So, [former attorney general] Bill Barr came out and said he personally viewed the video and nobody went in or out of the tier [where Epstein was housed]. When I heard that I said this is cover up.’… Noting that 11 or 12 inmates were already on that tier, Mark said, ‘They would not have to go in or out of the tier to kill somebody in their cell. Supposedly cell doors were left locked.’ The Epstein brother laid emphasis on how easily someone could have gotten into ‘Jeff’s cell and killed him.’.. 

“Mark Epstein’s argument aligns with what forensic pathologist Michael Baden had to say about the case. The deceased billionaire’s family hired Baden after his death was initially ruled a suicide. According to the pathologist, homicide was more likely than suicide, as he focussed on fractures in Epstein’s thyroid cartilage and hyoid bone being indicative of strangulation.”

The suicide story seems to be a fabrication and a cover-up. Far too many famous people would be interested in putting this case to rest and burying what could otherwise come to light.

Starmer’s Betrayal of Britain 

The Sun wrote on May 19: 

“BRITAIN will pay money to Brussels for a ‘sellout’ deal that drags the country back under the control of European judges and grants French boats access to our fishing waters for 12 YEARS. The agreement signed by Sir Keir Starmer in London today reveals the UK will be tethered to the EU’s rulebook on trade standards… 

“Former PM Boris Johnson blasted: ‘Two-tier Keir is once again going back on his promises to the people of this country – by making us non-voting members of a two-tier European Union. ‘Under this appalling sell out of a deal the UK will have to accept EU law on a host of measures from food standards to emissions trading.’… 

“The deal will see Britain follow the EU’s food standards but only be involved in ‘early stages’ of setting the rules – with the European Court of Justice the ultimate arbiter… The text also shows British taxpayers will make an ‘appropriate financial contribution’ to the EU as the price of what critics are blasting as a ‘surrender’ deal… 

“Sir Keir has agreed to give EU nations full access to its fishing waters until June 2038. The 12-year concession undermines one of the primary promises of Brexit: regaining control over British waters. UK fishermen, who were gunning for greater independence have expressed outrage at the major policy surrender.” 

Further evidence for Britain’s downfall. 

Britain Surrenders to the EU

On May 18, The Sun published the following article by Chris Philp, Shadow Home Secretary: 

“Whenever Labour negotiates, Britain loses. Keir Starmer is shamefully giving away Chagos Islands and then pay to rent them back. The two-tier tax deal with India was deeply unfair to British businesses. And today, we will see him roll over once again at his EU surrender summit… While he now talks tough on immigration for the cameras, we all know behind closed doors he doesn’t believe a word of it… 

“Today is Starmer’s first step in a walk of shame back to the EU’s stranglehold so he can crack Britain’s borders even wider open… It would make it far easier for hordes of unemployed people to come to the UK at a time when Labour is driving unemployment through the roof…” 

… and that without a shot having been fired…

Nigel Farage Issues Damning Verdict 

Daily Express published the following article by Nigel Farage on May 19:

“So, it’s happened. The Brexit betrayal by Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour party is in full swing. In 2016 we voted to take back control of our fishing waters from the EU and give a much-needed lifeline to our fishing industry. Today, we learn that Sir Keir [Starmer] will grant European fishermen access to British waters for 12 years. It’s an abject surrender… What makes this so galling is that 12 years is essentially enough to give European boats permanent access to our waters. This is because during that time older fishermen will leave the industry, and there will be no younger ones joining, and likewise no investment in new boats. With no new investment, the UK will quickly become an island with no fishing industry to speak of.

“First, he targeted our farming industry with increased inheritance tax on family farms. Now, he’s undermining our fishing sector by granting unbridled access to EU competitors. Starmer’s track record consistently puts foreign interests ahead of those of the British people. A clear example is the Chagos Islands deal, which is projected to cost the taxpayer £50 billion over its lifetime…” 

Starmer’s and Germany’s Take

Deutsche Welle wrote on May 19:

“The EU and UK are working towards a level of cooperation not seen since Brexit, with new agreements on fisheries, trade and security… ‘This is the first UK-EU summit,’ Starmer told reporters on Monday. ‘It marks a new era in our relationship, and this deal is a win-win.’ 

“An agreement on fisheries allows EU fishermen to have access to British waters for an extended period of 12 years in exchange for the EU indefinitely easing red tape on food and drink imports and exports. The eased customs checks on food and plant products are expected to add ‘nearly 9 billion pounds’ ($12 billion/€10.7 billion) to the British economy by 2040, Starmer’s office said in a statement.  Downing Street also said a new defense and security pact with the EU deal ‘will pave the way’ for the UK defense industry ‘to participate’ in a €150 billion ($167-billion) defense fund being set up by the EU… 

“Since taking office in July 2024, Starmer has pushed for what he calls a ‘reset’ of ties with the EU… Von der Leyen called the new agreements a ‘success’ and ‘an historic moment.’ Since the UK formally left the EU in 2020 after the Brexit referendum in 2016, ties have mostly been governed under a ‘Trade and Cooperation Agreement’ negotiated by former conservative PM Boris Johnson and signed in December 2020. Starmer… had opposed Brexit…

“In its election manifesto last year, Labour promised that it wouldn’t rejoin the EU’s single market and customs union, and free movement of people and goods. In August 2024, Starmer said revamping agreements with the EU ‘does not mean reversing Brexit or re-entering the single market or the customs union.’” 

Starmer has said the deal does not mean that Britain joins the EU. Stamer and the Labour Party are clearly engaging in double-talk. Starmer’s ambitions and goals are clear, but he will not succeed. Britain will never again become a full-fledged voting member of the EU. However, Starmer’s conduct may lead to a further surrender of Britain and its ongoing prophesied downfall. 

To Take Control of ALL of Gaza

AFP wrote on May 19:

“Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Monday that Israel will ‘take control’ of the whole of Gaza, as the military pressed a newly intensified campaign in the war-ravaged territory. After Israel announced it would let a ‘basic amount’ of food into the Gaza Strip, Netanyahu said it was necessary to prevent a famine for ‘diplomatic reasons.’… Last week President Donald Trump acknowledged that ‘a lot of people are starving,’ adding ‘we’re going to get that taken care of.’ In his inaugural mass, Pope Leo XIV [said], ‘In Gaza, the surviving children, families and elderly are reduced to starvation’… 

“But Israel’s far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir argued against any resumption of aid, saying on X: ‘Mr Prime Minister, our hostages receive no humanitarian aid… The Prime Minister is making a serious mistake in this move, and he has no majority at all. Hamas must only be crushed, and not at the same time provided with oxygen for its survival,’ he said in a statement… 

“Since a two-month ceasefire collapsed in March as Israel resumed its offensive, negotiations mediated by Qatar, Egypt and the United States have failed to make a breakthroughNetanyahu has opposed ending the war without Hamas’s total defeat, while Hamas has balked at handing over its weapons…

“Hamas’s October 2023 attack that triggered the war resulted in the deaths of 1,218 people on the Israeli side, mostly civilians… Hamas also took 251 hostages during the attack, 57 of whom remain in Gaza, including 34 the military says are dead. Gaza’s health ministry said Sunday at least 3,193 people have been killed since Israel resumed strikes March 18, taking the war’s overall toll to 53,339.”

A terrible situation all around. Trump’s Gaza “Riviera vision” becomes more and more a bad joke.

“Germany Can Still Rule the World” 

On May 17, the following article was authored by Johannes Koenraadt and published on linkin.bio: 

“… the Germans during the time of Otto von Bismarck were trying to unify all Muslims of the Middle East under the rule of the Turkish Ottoman Empire… Von Bismarck wanted… to attack colonial British interests in Egypt, Sudan, and Syria, by causing a revolt against the colonial rule. Germany could then seize control of the important trade routes of the Suez Canal and the Persian Gulf. Indeed, the surrounding territories such as Palestine, Iraq, Iran, and Syria were once allies of Germany during the world wars, even Turkey was an ally during World War I… 

“… American strategists also deeply fear… a German conquest of Russia… new German chancellor Friedrich Merz… vows to make the German army the strongest in Europe!

“During the Second World War, Germany was barely 1.5 times richer than Soviet Russia. Today, Germany is nearly 7 times richer than Putin’s Russia… Germany may indeed try to conquer Russia again… to ‘bring democracy’. With the EU’s help, by switching from Russian gas to gas from Qatar, the Muslim world might, for reasons of profit, even support the new German war machine…”

The Bible does indeed prophesy that Germany will enter into a collaboration treaty with Arab nations and Turkey to conquer Israel, and that a war will break out between Europe under German leadership and Russia and other Far Eastern nations. We are informed that the German leader will be disturbed by unsettling rumors from the Far East and will go out against those regions with great fury to destroy and annihilate many. 

The “Report” Against the AfD 

On May 15, Nius published the following commentary by Julian Reichelt: 

“This horrific report [by the “Verfassungsschutz” or “Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution”] is not about the AfD. It’s about the fundamental right to freedom of expression and all of us. The AfD is merely being used as a pretext to criminalize and permanently make impossible completely legitimate expressions of criticism of power and government… We are witnessing the most dangerous and unscrupulous attack on freedom of expression in the history of the Federal Republic. The report should remain secret so that you don’t realize that it’s not really about the AfD, but about your most sacred fundamental right… 

“In order to keep this report secret, the old government lied to us in its final hours in office. The failed, authoritarian former Interior Minister Nancy Faeser claimed that secret sources had to be protected… Now, our research reveals: There are no sources at all in this report. The report consists exclusively of public statements that were copied and documented from social media and public speeches… 

“Every journalist who has read this report must have realized: If the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution gets away with it, freedom of expression will end for every citizen. The secret dossier is nothing less than a legal basis for the prosecution of any criticism of power… The Stasi would be proud of this Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, which naturally also wants to pursue comparisons to the GDR as delegitimization. Criticism of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution is, of course, also recorded by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution and classified as right-wing extremist… 

“Criticism of Microsoft founder Bill Gates is classified by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution as anti-Semitism because Bill Gates supposedly ‘reads Jewish.’ This means: The secret service assumes that people are criticizing the political activist Bill Gates, who has financed Der Spiegel with millions, simply because they consider him a Jew, even though he is not.”

German Police Union: Tougher Border Checks Not Sustainable

Deutsche Welle reported on May 18: 

“Germany’s intensified border checks and the rejection of asylum seekers cannot continue for much longer

“[Andreas] Rosskopf, chairman of the German Police Union (GdP) police union, [said] that the current measures were only sustainable because duty rosters had been adjusted, training sessions paused, and officers’ overtime leave canceled. ‘The police can only keep up these intensive checks for a few more weeks,’ Rosskopf said, noting that more than 1,000 riot police officers had been deployed in border areas for several days.

“Shortly after taking office earlier this month, Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt ordered stricter border controls, allowing authorities to turn back migrants even if they seek asylum. According to Dobrindt, the number of people turned away has increased by nearly 50% since the changes were introduced….” 

What will the new German government do next? 

Pro-European Nicusor Dan Weins Romania‘s Election 

Newsmax wrote on May 18:

“Pro-European Union candidate Nicusor Dan has won Romania’s closely watched presidential runoff against a hard-right nationalist… A huge turnout Sunday played a key role in the tense election that many viewed as a geopolitical choice between East or West. 

“The race pitted front-runner George Simion, the 38-year-old leader of the hard-right Alliance for the Unity of Romanians, or AUR, against Dan, the incumbent mayor of Bucharest. It was held months after the cancelation of the previous election plunged Romania into its worst political crisis in decades… In the first-round vote on May 4, Simion won almost double the votes as Dan, and many local surveys had predicted he would secure the presidency.

“But in a swing that appeared to be a repudiation of Simion’s more skeptical approach to the EU, which Romania joined in 2007, Dan picked up almost 900,000 more votes to solidly defeat his opponent in the final round… 

“Romania’s political landscape was upended last year when a top court voided the previous election in which far-right outsider Calin Georgescu topped first-round polls, following allegations of electoral violations and Russian interference, which Moscow denied.” 

Romania has been accused of dictatorial methods and undue interference in the election process. 

WHY Does the Universe Exist? 

BBC wrote on May 20:

“Inside a laboratory nestled above the mist of the forests of South Dakota, scientists are searching for the answer to one of science’s biggest questions: why does our Universe exist?

They are in a race for the answer with a separate team of Japanese scientists – who are several years ahead… 

“The current theory of how the Universe came into being can’t explain the existence of the planets, stars and galaxies we see around us… 

“The scientists will travel 1,500 metres below the surface into three vast underground caverns…. ‘We are poised to build the detector that will change our understanding of the Universe with instruments that will be deployed by a collaboration of more than 1,400 scientists from 35 countries who are eager to answer the question of why we exist,’ [Dr Jaret Heise] says. When the Universe was created two kinds of particles were created: matter – from which stars, planets and everything around us are made – and, in equal amounts, antimatter, matter’s exact opposite.

Theoretically the two should have cancelled each other out, leaving nothing but a big burst of energy. And yet, here we – as matter – are… 

“Scientists believe that the answer to understanding why matter won – and we exist – lies in studying a particle called the neutrino and its antimatter opposite, the anti-neutrino. They will be firing beams of both kinds of particles from deep underground in Illinois to the detectors at South Dakota, 800 miles away. This is because as they travel, neutrinos and anti-neutrinos change ever so slightly. The scientists want to find out whether those changes are different for the neutrinos and anti-neutrinos. If they are, it could lead them to the answer of why matter and anti-matter don’t cancel each other out. 

“The Japanese-led team will be ready to turn on their neutrino beam in less than three years, several years earlier than the American project.  

Has one ever heard such total nonsense? Apart from this colossal waste of time and resources, it shows the absolute stupidity with which scientists are approaching the “mystery” of creation, even though the Bible has been giving the answers all along. But of course, scientists are too proud and far too “educated” to accept the simplicity of the Truth!

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News

Pope Leo XIV… Up to the Task?

The Independent wrote on May 9:

“The first-ever American-born pope inherits a world in crisis… Leo XIV’s vision for the Catholic church is one of ‘peace and justice’ and ‘building bridges’ ready to receive, with open arms, ‘all who need our charity, our presence, dialogue, love.’… His urgent message of peace confronts vast suffering and death from brutal wars, simmering tensions among nuclear powers, a long shadow of abuse within a church he now leads, and humanitarian outrage from his home country following three months of chaos under Donald Trump’s administration…

“The papal conclave… selected Leo XIV despite allegations that he had mishandled sexual abuse cases involving priests in both Peru and the United States. Survivors of abuse are now demanding accountability from the new pope… Leo XIV — the ‘Latin Yankee,’ as he is known in Rome — follows the Jesuit legacy of Francis in South America.”

Leo XIV has been hailed by many, including his own brother, as a “second Francis.” But this may or may not be an accurate designation.

Pope Leo XIV… Not So Good News For Trump?

The New York Post wrote on May 8:

“Newly elected Pope Leo XIV spent years amplifying criticism of President Trump’s policies on social media — with the Catholic Church’s first American leader taking particular aim at the Republican’s hardline immigration stance… His final X post before being elected… was a retweet of a message from Philadelphia-based Catholic commentator Rocco Palmo, who on April 14 slammed Trump’s partnership with El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele on deportation of illegal migrants… ‘Do you not see the suffering? Is your conscience not disturbed? How can you stay quiet?’ the tweet reads…

“Prevost was also an active participant in US political discussion during Trump’s first term — in 2017 retweeting a post from Palmo that said, ‘Calling refugee bans ‘a dark hour of US history,’ [Chicago Archbishop] Blase [Cupich] says “the world is watching as we abandon our commitment to American values”’. Also in January 2017, the new pope retweeted a message from Jesuit priest James Martin, who wrote, ‘We’re banning all Syrian refugees? The men, women and children who most need help? What an immoral nation we are becoming. Jesus weeps.’…

“The new pope expressed his opinion on other subjects as well. In October 2017, Prevost retweeted a call for new US gun control from Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) after a gunman murdered 60 people in Las Vegas…

“Trump congratulated the new pontiff on Truth Social and told reporters outside the West Wing that he was thrilled that an American will hold the post… ‘It is such an honor to realize that he is the first American Pope. What excitement, and what a Great Honor for our Country. I look forward to meeting Pope Leo XIV. It will be a very meaningful moment!’…”

Other Popes Leo…

CNN wrote on May 8:

“The first Pope Leo, who served in the fifth century (from 440 to 461), is known as ‘Leo the Great,’ and is remembered [in legend] for persuading Attila the Hun to halt his invasion and spare the Roman Empire from destruction… The name Leo derives from the Latin for ‘lion,’ suggesting strength and courage.”

It was also suggested that his name choice could represent a pope who wants to be strong during a time of crisis, with a profound respect for tradition and history.

There have been 14 popes with the name of Leo. Famous was Leo III. (795-816). He is notable for the coronation of Charlemagne as Emperor of the Romans on Christmas Day, 800 CE. [see below].

CBS News wrote on May 9:

“Leo I… wrote Leo’s Tome, a document that influenced the official doctrine defining Jesus Christ as both fully human and fully divine. [A totally false teaching.]…

“… the last pope to use the name Leo, Pope Leo XIII, who was the head of the Catholic Church between 1878 and 1903… is perhaps most famous for writing the Rerum Novarum… which translates to ‘On New Things,’ but the Latin meaning is also ‘On Revolutionary Changes.’…”

Why Did the Pope Pick Leo? Here’s Why the Name Is So Important in the Catholic Church

National Geographic wrote on May 9:

Pope Leo I tangled with Attila the Hun and won

“Elected in A.D. 795, Pope Leo III was the pope who crowned Charlamagne as the first Holy Roman emperor. ‘Many historians credit Charlemagne with spreading Christianity across these formerly pagan regions, bringing a common culture and homogeneity to disparate tribes.’ The ruler became defender of the Christian faith and, under him, the continent flourished.

“Pope Leo III’s decision to name the emperor as leader of the Church reaffirmed the relationship between the papacy and the Frankish rulers who would protect the Catholic Church against threats.

“Things came to a head after Constantinople closed all its Latin churches. In response, Pope Leo IX sent a delegation led by Hubert of Silva Candida to Constantinople ostensibly to settle the disagreement with Patriarch Michael Cerularius. Instead, Hubert placed an excommunication bull for the patriarch in the city on the altar at Hagia Sophia on July 16, 1054 A.D. Pope Leo IX had died by the time of the excommunication, but it was nonetheless a move that he had initiated. As a result, the Roman Catholic Church based in Rome and the Eastern Orthodox Church centered in Constantinople became two separate entities after this Great Schism…

“Another Pope Leo—Pope Leo X—also faced a divisive moment within Christendom. Pope Leo X… held the papal see from 1475 to 1521 A.D. During the last year of his pontificate, Pope Leo X excommunicated Martin Luther…”

Before and after the Great Schism, Bible prophecies focus on the development of the Catholic Church, headquartered in Rome.

Why the Name Leo XIV was Chosen?

Breitbart wrote on May 10:

“Speaking with the College of Cardinals on Saturday, [the new pope said:]

“‘I chose to take the name Leo XIV. There are different reasons for this, but mainly because Pope Leo XIII in his historic Encyclical Rerum Novarum addressed the social question in the context of the first great industrial revolution… In our own day, the Church offers to everyone the treasury of her social teaching in response to another industrial revolution and to developments in the field of artificial intelligence that pose new challenges for the defence of human dignity, justice and labor…’”

It is doubtful that this was the main reason for the choice of the name Leo. Note the next article.

The Pope and the Latin Mass

The Federalist wrote on May 9:

“[I’m setting] aside the obvious fact that Pope Leo is far more conservative on issues like abortion and gay marriage than most MAGA influencers… Pope Leo appears to be far more traditional and liturgically orthodox than his predecessor. In particular, he seems to have a special devotion to the Traditional Latin Mass.

This matters a great deal more than whether he has policy disagreements with Trump over things like immigration or gun control… Pope Francis was infamously hostile toward the Latin Mass despite its growing popularity around the world, especially among young people, converts, and Catholics committed to conforming their lives to the orthodox Catholic faith… In contrast, there are ample signs that Pope Leo will reverse course on the Latin Mass, lift restrictions on its celebration.

“… a restoration of the Latin Mass under Pope Leo would mean a return to doctrinal clarity and confidence, and a renewed papal resistance to the modernizing factions within the Catholic Church, such as the German prelates who for many years have been pushing for the ordination of women and communion for divorced-and-remarried Catholics. Above all, the restoration of the Latin Mass will all but guarantee that this pope will not push doctrinal boundaries the way Pope Francis did, and will return the Holy See to its traditional role of defending the Catholic faith and evangelizing the world.

“… In recent days multiple Catholic commentators have reported that Pope Leo, when he was Cardinal Prevost, privately celebrated the Latin Mass for years, including at the Vatican in recent years, where he had a special indult from Pope Francis to do so… the blessing Pope Leo gave the crowd from St. Peter’s Basilica was in Latin, using a formula that has not been used since Pope Pius XII in 1939. On Friday, Pope Leo celebrated the first Mass… in Latin

All Catholics should hope and pray for this, but so should all non-Catholics, whether Protestants or unbelievers, for the simple reason that… without a clear, strong voice in the Holy See defending the faith, our civilization will not long endure.”

The mother church with its daughter churches will become all-powerful again in these last days.

Where the New Pope MIGHT Stand…

Newsmax wrote on May 11:

“Based on a 2012 address to bishops, Leo would likely bring the church back in line.

“In that speech, Cardinal Robert Prevost accused the media of fostering ‘sympathy for beliefs and practices that are at odds with the Gospel.’ He cited the ‘homosexual lifestyle’ and ‘alternative families comprised of same-sex partners and their adopted children,’ according to the Post.

“Also, Prevost shot down a government initiative to promote gender ideology in schools while he was bishop of Chiclayo in northwestern Peru. ‘The promotion of gender ideology is confusing, because it seeks to create genders that don’t exist,’ he told media outlets at the time.

“On abortion, Prevost posted [a] photograph from a March For Life event in Chiclayo with the exhortation, ‘Let’s defend human life at all times!’ That includes a push against euthanasia…

“In regards to capital punishment, Prevost said in a 2015 post, ‘It’s time to end the death penalty.’

“The new Pope is aligned with the previous Pope on climate change. In November, Prevost said it is time to move ‘from words to action’ on the ‘environmental crisis,’ the Post reported…”

And then there are the issues of immigration and gun control…

Capitulation Day

The Guardian wrote on May 12:

“Donald Trump will inevitably claim Monday’s temporary truce in the US-China trade war as a victory, but financial markets seem to have read it for what it is – a capitulation. Stocks were up and bond yields were higher after the US treasury secretary Scott Bessent’s early morning press conference in Geneva…

“… tariffs on Chinese goods will be cut from 145% to 30% initially for a 90-day period. In return, China has cut its own tariffs on US imports to 10%, from the 125% it had imposed in retaliation against the White House. That still marks a big shift in the terms of trade between the two countries since before Trump came to power, but falls far short of what was in effect a trade embargo… In other words, the president has caved… the White House seems to have opted for tactical retreat…”

Mediaite added on May 12:

“In a series of posts to X early Monday, Fox Business Senior Correspondent Charles Gasparino delivered a blunt analysis of the drastic temporary tariff reduction by the U.S. and China and the 90-day pause before any further escalation.

“‘Both sides blinked,’ Gasparino wrote. He quickly followed up by adding, ‘I didn’t say we won…. Trump… was forced to back off… when you have to depend on [the markets] as we still do… you can’t go to trade war with the world without bad stuff happening.’”

What Is Trump Even Doing?

The Hill wrote on May 9:

“One of the most frustrating things about the Trump administration is that it offers too much nuttiness to process. Not long ago, the discovery that the president doesn’t know what the Declaration of Independence is would have consumed the country for months. Today, it barely registers because the Trump White House pumps out similar stories two or three times a week.  When you compare such stories to the trade war with China or President Trump’s claim that he doesn’t know whether he’s required to uphold the Constitution, it’s tempting to view Trump’s recent brainstorms on movie tariffs and reopening Alcatraz as mere distractions. That would be a mistake. They are evidence of something much darker than Steve Bannon’s call to ‘flood the zone with s…’

Alcatraz was closed down in 1963 because it was too expensive to run and too expensive to renovate… Nor can it be ‘substantially enlarged’ because Alcatraz Island is only 22 acres. If you want a new prison for the worst of the worst, Alcatraz would be the last place you would choose. 

“About 20 minutes later, Trump decided he is going to impose a 100 percent tariff on foreign movies… The idea is unworkable and betrays no understanding of how movies are made. What, exactly, is a ‘foreign film?’ Many films are made in multiple locations both inside and outside the U.S. What about content made for television and streaming? And what would you impose a tariff on? The cost of shooting overseas? The movie’s budget? Ticket sales? 

“Apart from all the practical issues, any plan to impose a tax on foreign films is almost certainly an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment. If it isn’t constitutional to impose a two percent tax on newspapers, it’s hard to see how it could be constitutional to impose a 100 percent tax on movies… as a content-based restriction based on the ‘messaging and propaganda’ in foreign films…”

And now, controversial and extremely right-wing conservative White House “adviser” Stephen Miller announced that the Trump administration is considering suspending “habeas corpus,” as we are being invaded by foreign enemies. Can anything become more weird?

Regarding the concept of “habeas corpus,” ctvnews wrote on May 10: “Habeas corpus is a legal principle that allows people who believe they are being unlawfully detained or imprisoned to petition for their release in court.”

Habeas corpus, meaning “you should have the body,” is a legal procedure to ensure that individuals are not unlawfully imprisoned. It is a legal order that requires a person to be brought before a judge to ensure their detention is lawful. It’s a check on government power, protecting against unlawful imprisonment. 

Money Struggles and Mental Health

Study Finds wrote on May 8:

“Americans are drowning in money worries, and it’s taking a serious toll on their mental health. A new survey reveals that 70% of Americans say their financial stress has hit an all-time high, with more than three-quarters feeling totally alone in their struggle to manage money pressures.

“Even worse, this financial strain is affecting people’s overall well-being, with 20% reporting worse mental health over the past year. The survey found that 40% of respondents have skipped work or school to focus on their mental health…”

But everything is getting better in the USA, right?

Fighting Big Pharma

The Associated Press wrote on May 12:

“President Donald Trump on Monday signed a sweeping executive order setting a 30-day deadline for drugmakers to electively [sic] lower the cost of prescription drugs in the U.S. or face new limits down the road over what the government will pay…

“It’s unclear what — if any — impact the Republican president’s executive order will have on millions of Americans who have private health insurance. The federal government has the most power to shape the price it pays for drugs covered by Medicare and Medicaid… The nation’s pharmaceutical lobby, which represents the top U.S. drugmakers, immediately pushed back against Trump’s order, calling it a ‘bad deal’ for American patients…”

Of course, Big Pharma would oppose this, as their incredible profit from overcharged drug prices might be somewhat diminished. As the article points out:

“Taxpayers spend hundreds of billions of dollars on prescription drugs, injectables, transfusions and other medications every year through Medicare, which covers nearly 70 million older Americans. Medicaid, which provides nearly-free health care for almost 80 million poor and disabled people in the U.S. also spends tens of billions of dollars each year for drugs.”

On average, drugs in the USA are approximately three times more expensive than the same drugs in Europe.

Many Afraid of World War III

Global News Canada wrote on May 6:

“Eighty years after VE-Day, which marked the formal Nazi surrender and the end of six years of war in Europe, many fear a third world war is imminent. New [polling] conducted in Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the U.S. shows that between 41 per cent and 55 per cent of respondents in each country think another world war is likely to occur within the next five to 10 years. Forty-five per cent of Americans hold the same view…

“If another world war happens…, the majority (68 to 76 per cent) believe the conflict would involve nuclear weapons. Moreover, 57 to 73 per cent think that a third world war would result in a higher casualty count than previous global conflicts…  25 to 44 per cent believe that if another world war were to occur in the next five to 10 years, it would result in the deaths of most of the world’s population… 72 per cent believe there is a likelihood that nuclear, biological, or chemical warfare could happen somewhere in the world.

“… most people felt their respective country’s militaries would not be sufficiently prepared to enter a war. ‘Only a minority of western Europeans believe their national militaries could effectively defend their countries in the event of a third world war, ranging from a low of 16 per cent in Italy to a high of 44 per cent in France,’ the survey says. ‘By contrast, 71 per cent of Americans have confidence that the armed forces could defend their country,’ YouGov found.

“As for the source of the threat, most European countries cite Russia as the culprit, with 72 to 82 per cent of Western Europeans telling YouGov they see the superpower as a major or moderate threat to peace in Europe. Meanwhile, 69 per cent of Americans agreed.

“Since the beginning of U.S. President Donald Trump’s second term, attitudes towards Europe’s once-steadfast ally have shifted, with many now considering the country [the USA] a looming threat to peace… ‘With Donald Trump making threats against Greenland, Canada and Panama, as well as his stance on Ukraine, a majority of people in Spain (58 per cent), Germany (55 per cent) and France (53 per cent) see tensions between Europe and the U.S. as a major or moderate threat to continental peace,’ it says. ‘Meanwhile, Americans are less likely to say so, although a third (34 per cent) still agree with their western European counterparts,’ the polling continues.”

Nuclear War—a Frightening Scenario

The Telegraph wrote on May 10:

“The Arms Control Association, a US-based nonpartisan organisation, counts more than 12,100 nuclear weapons in the world today, 90 per cent of them held by the US and Russia. China, France, Britain, India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea hold the remainder.

“They are generally delivered by very fast ICBMs that fly into space and can reach targets less than half an hour after launch. Some carry multiple warheads that then independently plummet to different targets. They are almost impossible to intercept.

“While we tend to think of mushroom clouds over Hiroshima and Nagasaki and memories of GCSE physics – the banging together of lumps of uranium or plutonium until electrons start smashing apart atoms – most of the weapons in the nose cones of today’s missiles are different beasts entirely.

“These ‘thermonuclear’ weapons use a Hiroshima-style device only as the trigger for another device, nestled next to it in the same bomb casing, that contains isotopes of hydrogen that fuse into helium atoms. That is the same thing that happens in the centre of the sun, and it generates extraordinary amounts of energy.

“The Hiroshima bomb killed 66,000 people with 15 kilotons of power – the equivalent of 15,000 tons of conventional TNT high explosive going off at once. But the most powerful thermonuclear weapons ever exploded, the US Castle Bravo test in 1954 and the Soviet Tsar Bomba in 1961, released 15 and 50 megatons respectively. One megaton equals 1,000 kilotons. There is, Soviet scientists concluded after testing the Tsar Bomba, practically no upper limit to the destructive power of such devices…”

Is Trump Abandoning Netanyahu?

Israel Today wrote on May 9:

“Sources claim Trump is fed up with Netanyahu and tired of Israel standing in the way of his Middle East vision.

“If the Reuters report is accurate and Donald Trump is no longer making normalization with Israel a condition for the US supporting a civilian nuclear program in Saudi Arabia, this would prove what many fear: Trump has thrown Israel under the bus.

“But this report doesn’t come out of nowhere. It fits into a series of American moves that have shaken Israel in recent months—whether it’s the secret dialogue with Iran, the US announcement of an agreement with the Houthis that Israel only learned about through the media, the omission of Israel from Trump’s upcoming Middle East trip, the warm relations with Recep Tayyip Erdoğan at Israel’s expense, the planned withdrawal from Syria, and much more.

“… The US administration is frustrated with… the obstacles Jerusalem is creating for Washington’s vision for the Middle East—a vision that is supposed to earn Trump the Nobel Peace Prize.”

The White House responded by saying that reports about friction between Trump and Netanyahu are “preposterous.”

Will Israel Do It Alone?

Breitbart wrote on May 9:

“Netanyahu is reaching the point where he will attack Iran’s nuclear sides — and, ironically, it is President Donald Trump who is pushing him there. That might seem odd, given that Trump has been more supportive of Israel than any other U.S. president… Trump is now pursuing a new nuclear deal with Iran, and early reports suggest that it will have many, if not all, of the same features that made President Barack Obama’s Iran deal such a failure

“Netanyahu recently said that no deal would be a better option than a bad deal. Meanwhile, Trump reportedly has grown frustrated with him, and is prepared to act without his cooperation. But the feeling is mutual. Netanyahu has been recalling, in public, the many times that Israel acted on its own, regardless of who was in the White House, to protect its interests. He is clearly setting the stage for Israel to strike Iran unilaterally….

“Moreover, the Trump administration has twice surprised the Netanyahu government in the past several weeks. First, as Netanyahu sat next to him in the White House last month, Trump announced that the U.S. would talk with Iran. Next, Trump announced a ceasefire with the Houthis — without Israel, which the Houthis vowed to continue attacking.

“Netanyahu does not want to risk his relationship with Trump… but he also does not want to go down in the in history as the leader who could have protected his country, but did not. (Especially after October 7.) The chance is growing that Israel will strike Iran on its own… do not be surprised when it happens.”

Trump in the Middle East

Reuters reported on May 13:

“The US agreed on Tuesday to sell Saudi Arabia an arms package worth nearly $142 billion, according to a White House fact sheet that called it ‘the largest defense cooperation agreement’ Washington has ever done.

“The agreement, signed during US President Donald Trump’s visit to the Saudi capital Riyadh, covers deals with more than a dozen US defense companies in areas including air and missile defense, air force and space advancement, maritime security and communications, the fact sheet said.”

In 2019, a congressional rebuke of Saudi Arabia followed the 2018 murder of Jamal Khashoggi inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, which weakened support for Riyadh in Washington after US intelligence agencies found that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) ordered the operation. MBS has never been held accountable, and the newly-found “friendship” between MBS and Trump is embarrassing, to say the very least.

Trump encouraged Saudi Arabia to sign the “Abraham Accords,” which have established by now formal ties between Israel and four Arab countries. Trump also encouraged Saudi Arabia to recognize the State of Israel. Saudi Arabia had stated that in order to do so, a Palestinian State must be recognized first. According to the Bible, Saudi Arabia will turn against Israel—and perhaps the USA—in an effort to destroy Israel. Trump also announced that Saudi Arabia will invest $600 billion in the USA.

Further, in a major policy shift, Trump declared in Riyadh that he will end sanctions against Syria under Syria’s new president Ahmed al-Sharaa (whom Trump met in Saudi Arabia), who has been called by Israel a jihadist, leading a “terror group from Idlib that took Damascus by force”. Sharaa was for years the leader of al Qaeda’s official wing in the Syrian conflict. He first joined al Qaeda in Iraq, where he spent five years in a U.S. prison. The United States removed a $10 million bounty on Sharaa’s head in December. Trump encouraged al-Sharaa to join the Abraham Accords recognizing Israel and said al-Sharaa would do so once his country has stabilized.

Trump’s policy shift came about after pleas from MBS and Turkey’s PM Erdogan.

Later, Trump flew to Qatar where he signed an agreement with Qatar to generate an economic exchange worth at least $1.2 trillion. Trump also announced economic deals totaling more than $243.5 billion between the United States and Qatar, including a historic sale of Boeing aircraft and GE Aerospace engines to Qatar Airways.  

Fox News Host Mark Levin, a strong supporter of Trump, was not happy with his tour of Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Levin blasted Saudi Arabia for playing a “significant role in the 9/11 slaughter of our people.” He also condemned Qatar for having “protected the leader of the 9/11 attack from the FBI, before he was able to launch his war on America that killed our people.”

Canada and Europe on Defense

The Canadian Press wrote on May 9:

“As U.S. President Donald Trump continues to cast doubt on the future of the NATO military alliance, Canada is looking to partner with the European Union on defence… European companies already invest fairly heavily and extensively in Canada, including on defence…

“Separately, Germany and Norway have proposed partnering with Canada to procure new submarines…

“… the EU wants to use the clout it enjoys due to the size of its market to set military procurement standards that would make it easier for European armies to work together…”

Russia and China vs. USA

NBC News wrote on May 9:

“Russia marked the 80th anniversary of the World War II victory over Nazi Germany on Friday with a parade attended by Chinese President Xi Jinping, as the two countries vowed to strengthen ties and ‘firmly’ counter U.S. influence… thousands of Russian troops marched on Red Square, with military units from China and 12 other countries also taking part…

“In a lengthy joint statement, Xi and Putin said they would deepen military and other ties and ‘strengthen coordination and jointly respond firmly to the United States’ policy of ‘dual containment’ against both countries.’”

The Kings of the East alliance is getting stronger.

The U.S. Is Unloved

Politico wrote on May 12:

“The world is more divided than ever, but there’s still something (nearly) everyone agrees on: The U.S. is unloved. A majority of people surveyed had an overall negative perception of the U.S… America’s reputation took a particularly massive hit in EU countries

“Meanwhile, China kept improving its global standing, overtaking the U.S. for the first time and recording mostly positive perceptions in all regions except Europe. Russia, the reputation of which tanked in the wake of President Vladimir Putin’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, is still (slightly) more unpopular than the U.S. — though its image is also improving…

Israel emerged as the country with the worst global reputation… especially in the Middle East and South Asia. Israel is unpopular even in European countries that have historically been its allies, such as Germany, signaling growing discomfort with its government’s conduct in Gaza and the West Bank….”

A Peace Deal Between Russia and Ukraine?

Fox News wrote on May 11:

“Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy agreed to meet face-to-face with Russian President Vladimir Putin… Putin initially proposed the Thursday meeting this weekend, and President Donald Trump prompted Zelenskyy to accept the offer… Ukraine and Russia are currently under a ceasefire marking the anniversary of the end of World War II in Europe…

“‘President Putin of Russia doesn’t want to have a Cease Fire Agreement with Ukraine, but rather wants to meet on Thursday, in Turkey, to negotiate a possible end to the BLOODBATH,’ Trump wrote on social media. ‘Ukraine should agree to this, IMMEDIATELY. At least they will be able to determine whether or not a deal is possible, and if it is not, European leaders, and the U.S., will know where everything stands, and can proceed accordingly! I’m starting to doubt that Ukraine will make a deal with Putin, who’s too busy celebrating the Victory of World War ll, which could not have been won (not even close!) without the United States of America. HAVE THE MEETING, NOW!!!’ He added.

“Putin has thus far offered few, if any, concessions but is now saying talks should address the root causes of the war. He said he would speak to Turkish President Tayyip Erdoğan later on Sunday about facilitating the negotiations…

“Putin’s proposal for direct talks came hours after European leaders [from Germany, France, UK and Poland] demanded on Saturday in Kyiv that the Russian president agree to an unconditional 30-day ceasefire or face new sanctions. But Putin dismissed attempts by some European powers to issue what he described as ‘ultimatums.’…”

The New York Post wrote on May 15:

“Instead of turning up himself, Putin sent his aide Vladimir Medinsky — his former culture minister… Though Zelensky was ready to meet with Putin for direct talks, he will now send Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov to represent Kyiv in the talks with Medinsky.”

The four European leaders communicated with President Trump over cell phone, saying that their proposal for a 30-day ceasefire was “backed by” Trump, and that Russia would face “massive” sanctions if Moscow does not comply. Merz also stated Germany would continue “supporting Ukraine militarily as much as we can”; that “the measures we take together to end this war and what joint decisions we make to secure a possible peace in Ukraine are not matters for public discussion”; and that “Under my leadership, the debate about weapons deliveries, caliber, weapons systems and so on will be kept out of the public eye.” Is he just talking about his leadership of Germany, or his leadership of Europe?

Deutsche Welle wrote on May 15:

“German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Wednesday pledged to turn the Bundeswehr into ‘the strongest conventional army in Europe.’… ‘Our goal is a Germany and a Europe that are so strong together that we never have to use our weapons,’ Merz said… The chancellor said he believed that ‘anyone who seriously believes that Russia would be satisfied with a victory over Ukraine or with the annexation of parts of the country is mistaken.’”

No Return to EU

The Telegraph wrote on May 9:

“The EU has missed its chance to draw Britain back into its close commercial and regulatory orbit… Each British trade deal with another country or bloc closes the window further on a return to the EU single market and customs union. The agreements with India and the US follow rapidly on Britain’s accession to the East Asia-Latin America trade pact (CPTPP). A deal with the Gulf states is coming soon. These are large parts of the world economy.

“The magnetic pull of the EU can no longer compete with this greater force. All of the accumulating deals would have to be repudiated if Britain were ever again subsumed into the EU’s trading machinery as a satellite – i.e. a de facto EU member without voting rights. To do so would have exorbitant geopolitical consequences and costs. It is safe to say that the Rejoiner dream entered its final agony this week.”

Britain is not to become part of the EU again. However, the nature of the “deal” between the USA and the UK is highly disputed.

Trade “Deal” With UK Bad for USA

The Huffington Post wrote on May 8:

“President Donald Trump boasted on Thursday of a new trade agreement that, on average, triples the taxes Americans will have to pay on British imports

“According to a chart used by Trump, the new trade deal with the United Kingdom will bring in $6 billion in ‘external revenue’… to describe payments collected by U.S. Customs… The new 10% rate for nearly all goods, which was announced last month for countries all over the world, is three times higher than the 3.4% average rate Americans have paid for goods from Britain and Northern Ireland.

“… In reality, foreign nations pay none of those tariffs. American importers do, predominantly manufacturers buying raw materials and retailers. Both pass along the import taxes in the form of higher prices paid by consumers… If all the tariff rates announced by Trump on his so-called ‘Liberation Day’ on April 2 go into effect, it will cost American importers and consumers an extra $2.4 trillion in new taxes over a decade.”

At the same time, voices in Britain say that the “deal” is bad for the UK.

Starmer Destroys UK Business

Express wrote on May 10:

“This week Keir Starmer has not asked what he can do for Britain, but what Britain can do for America. His attempt at a trade deal has sold our country short of the comprehensive agreement which is what we need. It is a rushed response to Donald Trump’s tariffs that leaves almost every business with worse trading arrangements than we had in January – and far worse off than when he got the job.

“Starmer is parading around like the emperor with no clothes… whilst the world averts its eyes at this sight of our embarrassing leader and his cabinet who understand nothing about business… The right deal with the US could start to repair some of the damage he caused by trash talking the economy, hiking taxes to record highs and the devastating trade union red tape about to be unleashed on business. A comprehensive US trade deal covering all sectors and eliminating tariffs on both sides is the closest he will find to a silver bullet…

“And it shouldn’t have been too hard. He just needs to pick up where we left off when we negotiated with President Trump in his first term… His Trade Secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, said that any agreement that didn’t get rid of tariffs would be a failure. By his own mark – Starmer has failed. Most products made in Britain will continue to face the 10% baseline tariff imposed in April…

“As a patriot, I want Keir Starmer to succeed in securing the real deal with America, but this deal just is not it…  With a proper deal, every single part of the UK would benefit from better business access, more investment, better jobs and higher wages…”

India-Pakistan Ceasefire?

Daily Mail wrote on May 10:

“Donald Trump says India and Pakistan have agreed to a ceasefire just hours after both sides boasted of fresh military strikes. The two nuclear-armed neighbours had also traded drone attacks and artillery fire after a gun massacre last month that India blames on Pakistan.

“In a post on social media platform Truth Social, the US President wrote: ‘After a long night of talks mediated by the United States, I am pleased to announce that India and Pakistan have agreed to a full and immediate ceasefire…’”

Hours after the announcement, both India and Pakistan accused each other of having broken the ceasefire. It appears now that the ceasefire seems to hold.

Germany’s Fight Against “Far-Right Extremists” Continues Under New Government

Deutsche Welle wrote on May 14:

A spokeswoman for Germany’s Federal Prosecutor’s Office said the founder of the ‘Reich Citizens’ subgroup ‘Kingdom of Germany,’ Peter Fitzek, had been taken into custody on Thursday. Fitzek and three other suspected ringleaders of the group, part of a conspiracy theorist movement that rejects the legitimacy of the modern German republic, were arrested.

“Police on Tuesday conducted raids on the properties of key members of the group in seven German states, making four arrests. The swoop came after [new] Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt banned what is currently the largest group of so-called Reich Citizens. He accused the ‘Kingdom of Germany’ of trying to establish a ‘counter-state’ within Germany [and building] up criminal economic structures…

“According to Dobrindt, the ‘Kingdom of Germany’ group, which reportedly has around 6,000 members, is the biggest association within the Reichsbuerger scene… [S]ome members… refuse demands made by legal authorities, such as fines and taxes. They have also been known to print their own passports and driver’s licenses… The Tuesday raids took place in Baden-Württemberg, Lower Saxony, North Rhine-Westphalia, Rhineland-Palatinate, Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt and Thuringia.”

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

©2025 Church of the Eternal God
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.