This Week in the News

Germany Decides on Full, Unlimited Rearmament!

Financial Times wrote on March 4:

“Chancellor-to-be Friedrich Merz has agreed a deal with his likely coalition partner to inject hundreds of billions in extra funding into Germany’s military and infrastructure, in a ‘fiscal sea change’ designed to revive and re-arm Europe’s largest economy

“A provision would exempt defence spending above 1 per cent of GDP from the ‘debt brake’ that caps government borrowing, allowing Germany to raise an unlimited amount of debt to fund its armed forces and to provide military assistance to Ukraine…

“Germany’s massive fiscal stimulus has also underlined the sense of urgency in Europe, spurred by US President Donald Trump’s threat to unwind the US guarantees that have long underpinned the continent’s security.

“’This is a fiscal sea change for Germany,’ said Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Berenberg. ‘Merz and his coalition-to-be are rising to the occasion’…

“Jana Puglierin, a senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said: “It is a huge investment in Germany‘s ability to act — and potentially in Europe’s [ability to act] if Germany finds its way back to being a constructive European leader

“Merz’s deal with the SPD came as the European Commission outlined on Tuesday a joint debt instrument that would enable member states to fund the purchase of military equipment.”

The European military power bloc under Germany’s lead is developing—very rapidly! 

The Clash! 

Piers Morgan wrote that it started with the silly question by Marjorie Tyler Moore’s boyfriend and “conservative commentator” about why Zelensky did not wear a suit, which he indicated was disrespectful. (Elon Musk does not wear one either. Nor did Churchill during war time.) Then Vance jumped in and accused Zelensky of not being grateful to the USA and not having said thank you once (Zelensky thanked the USA at least 33 times in the past. He also started off the meeting with thanking the USA and Donald Trump). Then, Vance talked about diplomacy, and when Zelensky asked what kind of diplomacy, and that a peace deal would have to have security guarantees for Ukraine, Trump lost it. 

Will Trump Withdraw Support? 

Sunday World wrote on March 1: 

“Zelensky had seen the meeting in the Oval Office as an opportunity to convince the United States not to side with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who ordered the invasion of Ukraine three years ago. [The] meeting with Donald Trump ended in disaster on Friday… 

“Trump has lurched toward Russia since taking over as president, shocking traditional allies in Europe and beyond and leaving Ukraine increasingly vulnerable. Friday’s outburst was the most public display of that shift. 

“Vance stressed the need for diplomacy to resolve the biggest conflict in Europe since World War Two, while Zelensky, with his arms folded, countered that Putin could not be trusted in any talks… Zelensky openly challenged Trump over his softer approach toward Putin, urging him to ‘make no compromises with a killer.’… 

“The head of the Ukrainian armed forces, Oleksandr Syrskyi, posted a statement on Telegram affirming that his troops stood by Zelensky and that Ukraine’s strength was in its unity. Anxious Ukrainians following from afar largely rallied around their leader, but fretted about the prospects of continuing flows of U.S. military aid that the country has relied on. 

“In Congress, reaction from Trump’s Republican Party was mixed, while Democrats lambasted his handling of the meeting… 

“The falling out meant that Ukraine and the United States failed to sign a much-vaunted minerals deal that Kyiv hoped would spur Trump to back Ukraine’s war effort, and potentially win support from Republicans in Congress for a new round of aid. The clash also undermined efforts by European leaders to convince Trump to provide security guarantees for Ukraine even if he has refused to deploy U.S. soldiers on Ukrainian soil to maintain peace. Such guarantees are seen as crucial to deter Russia from future aggression. 

Trump threatened to withdraw U.S. support from Ukraine. ‘You’re either going to make a deal, or we’re out, and if we’re out, you’ll fight it out. I don’t think it’s going to be pretty,’ Trump told Zelensky… 

“Zelensky, who won billions of dollars of U.S. weaponry and moral support from the Biden administration, is facing a sharply different attitude from Trump. Trump wants to quickly wind down the three-year war, improve ties with Russia and recoup money spent to support Ukraine.” 

Reactions to the Trump-Zelensky Clash 

The New York Times wrote on February 28:

“European leaders quickly pledged their continued support for Ukraine on Friday after President Trump’s blistering criticism of Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, in a meeting at the White House.

“Leaders lined up behind Ukraine and praised its embattled president, the statements coming one after the other: from France, Germany, Poland, Spain, Denmark, the Netherlands, Portugal, the Czech Republic, Norway, Finland, Croatia, Estonia, Latvia, Slovenia, Belgium, Lithuania, Luxembourg and Ireland. Canadian, Australia and New Zealand…

… many in Europe addressed their statements of encouragement directly to Mr. Zelensky.

“‘Your dignity honors the bravery of the Ukrainian people,’ Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, said on social media, referring to Mr. Zelensky. ‘Be strong, be brave, be fearless. You are never alone, dear President.’

“President Emmanuel Macron of France, who had put on a display of friendship with Mr. Trump during a chummy visit to the White House on Monday, said the United States and Europe had been justified in aiding Ukraine and imposing sanctions on Russia after its full-scale invasion of Ukraine three years…

Friedrich Merz said in a statement…  addressed to ‘Dear Volodymyr’ that his country would stand behind Ukraine ‘in good and in testing times… We must never confuse aggressor and victim in this terrible war,’ Mr. Merz added, apparently referring to Mr. Trump, who has called Mr. Zelensky a dictator and blamed him for the invasion. The departing German leader, Chancellor Olaf Scholz, said that Ukraine could rely on Germany and the rest of Europe.

Daniel Fried, a career diplomat under American presidents of both parties who had just returned from a trip to Brussels, said the Oval Office clash had jolted Europe’s capitals, generated a wave of sympathy for Mr. Zelensky and upended a peace process that appeared to be gaining traction. ‘The Europeans are horrified and dismayed,’ Mr. Fried said…

“Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain, a center-left leader who carefully avoided any major disagreements with Mr. Trump during a visit to the White House on Thursday, spoke with Mr. Trump and Mr. Zelensky on Friday, according to the prime minister’s office. Mr. Starmer ‘retains his unwavering support for Ukraine and is playing his part to find a path forward to a lasting peace,’ the office said in a statement…

“The Canadian foreign minister, Mélanie Joly, joined the European leaders in offering words of support for Ukraine… On Saturday morning in Australia, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese echoed the messages of support from Europe. Mr. Albanese said his country was proud to help Ukraine  defend itself against ‘the brutality of Russian aggression.’’

The Indiana Express added on February 28:

Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof reiterated support, stating, ‘The Netherlands supports Ukraine as firmly as ever. Now more than ever.’” 

Deutsche Welle added on February 28:

“EU Foreign Policy Chief Kaja Kallas also joined in the support for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. ‘We will step up our support to Ukraine so that they can continue to fight back the aggressor,’ she wrote in a post on X. Kallas also stressed that ‘the free world needs a new leader’ and that it’s up to Europe ‘to take this challenge.’”

t-online wrote on February 28:

“A peak of arrogance – Donald Trump and J. D. Vance simply kicked Volodymyr Zelensky out. What a bottomless disgrace… The completely wrong film is being shown in Washington today. Because it is not Zelensky, but Putin who is playing with a third world war. It was not Zelensky, whom Trump has repeatedly insulted as a dictator, who started this murderous war, but Putin…

“It was not the Ukrainian president who behaved disrespectfully towards the USA and its famous Oval Office. First and foremost, it was the American Vice President J. D. Vance and President Donald Trump who not only treated Zelensky disgracefully, but also damaged their own office and America’s reputation. What happened in Washington today is a historic disgrace in America’s often glorious history.”

Die Welt wrote on February 28:

“The scandal in the White House has shown Europe that it can no longer rely on the USA under Donald Trump. Not in the defense of Ukraine, but also not in the defense of the values ​​that make up the free West. 

Bild wrote on February 28:

“It was tragically a historic moment in the Oval Office that will bring joy to the Kremlin. A moment that can change the world. And poses huge problems for Europe and Germany. For Vladimir Putin, on the other hand, it was the best day in a long time.

“What Trump and Vance did there has NOTHING to do with the values ​​of the free West… Trump and Vance… didn’t say a word to Putin. Simply unbelievable. The full escalation is the worst outcome that could have happened.” 

ntv wrote on February 28: 

“Roderich Kiesewetter, CDU foreign policy expert: ‘What Donald Trump’s attack on Selenskyj in the Oval Office shows is that Donald Trump has changed sides… The USA is therefore no longer a partner.” 

Bild wrote on March 1: 

“Rzeczspospolita” (Poland): ‘In American history, no US president has ever treated a foreign head of state, let alone an allied country, in this way. […] This shows where the USA, the leader of the free world for decades, has developed under Trump. […] Zelensky made the emperor nakedHe showed who Trump really is.’ 

“The Telegraph (UK): ‘Such a display of aggression by the White House towards a Western-oriented head of state, let alone an ally engaged in an existential military struggle, is unprecedented. Trump and Vance were undoubtedly wrong – factually, geopolitically and morally.’ 

“El País (Spain): ‘The exchange of blows, live and in front of journalists, is the impressive symbol of the end of an era. It is a brutal confirmation of the US’s abrupt change of course, both in content and form, compared to the past 80 years.” 

BBC wrote on March 1: 

“The public breakdown also signals a major crisis looming between European members of Nato and the US. 

“There will be many more doubts and questions about the US commitment to European security outside Ukraine. The biggest is whether President Trump would keep the promise his predecessor Harry Truman made in 1949 to treat an attack on a Nato ally as an attack on America. Those concerns are based on what appears to be Trump’s determination to restore a strong relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin

“He has put heavy pressure on Ukraine while offering Putin big concessions – that would have to be made by the Ukrainians. The security of Ukraine is coming a poor second – and Europeans are worrying theirs is too. President Zelensky’s refusal to make those concessions has infuriated Trump… Ukrainians believe they are in a war for national survival – and that Putin would break any promise to end the war if he is not deterred.” 

Trump has said that once a peace deal is made, Putin would stick to it. This is naïve and totally unrealistic. 

Reuters wrote on March 1: 

“NORWEGIAN PRIME MINISTER JONAS GAHR STOERE IN STATEMENT TO TV2: ‘What we saw from the White House today is serious and disheartening. Ukraine still needs the US’s support, and Ukraine’s security and future are also important to the US and to Europe. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has strong support in Ukraine, broad support in Europe, and he has led his people through a very demanding and brutal time, under attack from Russia. 

“‘That Trump accuses Zelenskiy of gambling with World War III is deeply unreasonable and a statement I distance myself from. Norway stands with Ukraine in their struggle for freedom. We hope that the Trump administration also understands the importance of a just and lasting peace in Ukraine.’ 

“SWISS PRESIDENT KARIN KELLER-SUTTER ON X: ‘Switzerland remains firmly committed to supporting a just and lasting peace, while condemning Russia’s aggression against a sovereign state.’ 

“JOHANN WADEPHUL, DEPUTY OF CONSERVATIVE PARTY-GROUP IN GERMAN PARLIAMENT, THE PARTY OF INCOMING CHANCELLOR FRIEDRICH MERZ, ON X: ‘The scenes from the White House are shocking. How can you stab the president of an invaded country in the back like this? Free Europe will not betray Ukraine!’”

Focus wrote on March 2: 

“After the heated argument in the White House between the USA and Ukraine, the former chairman of the Munich Security Conference, Christoph Heusgen, is counting on a significant strengthening of Europe… Now is Europe’s hour… 

“The former Foreign Minister and Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel… criticized… the US government’s attitude towards Europe and its role in security policy. ‘After more than 80 years, this American government has made the decision… no longer to be a partner for Europe’… ‘For Trump, Europe is no longer a strategic partner, but just a burden… I am sure that he wants to weaken or even destroy Europe, because we are actually quite big.’… 

“Gabriel expressed concern that Trump’s strategy ultimately plays into Vladimir Putin’s hands. ‘For the US President, peace seems to mean leaving Ukraine to Vladimir Putin. And to replace the strength of the law with the right of the strongest…’ This is a wake-up call for Europe. ‘Many Europeans would like to see a Germany finally return to the political stage that is prepared to take the lead together with others,’ said Gabriel.”

Europe in Support of Zelensky… Facing US Challenges 

Deutsche Welle wrote on March 2: 

“Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has joined leaders from the UK, Germany, France and others after a public showdown with Trump sent shockwaves… The London conference opened with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer giving an address… where dozens of world leaders have gathered to discuss Ukraine’s and Europe’s future, especially in the shadow of an increasingly antagonistic administration in the US. ‘We gather here today because this is a once-in-a-generation moment for the security of Europe and we all need to step up,’ Starmer said. He said the leaders will discuss a plan on how to end the war with Ukraine before presenting it to the US… In addition to prime ministers and heads of European states, the guests include Canada’s outgoing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen… 

“Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov emphasized his country’s opposition to deploying European peacekeepers to Ukraine… He also praised US President Donald Trump for wanting to end the war, accusing Europe of seeking to continue the conflict… Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk stressed that Europe must believe in its power… ‘Europe has an advantage over everyone here,’ Tusk said, adding that with some 2.6 million professional soldiers, Europe has more troops than the US, China or Russia. He also stressed the continent’s combat aircraft and artillery strength. ‘Today in Europe there is a deficit of imagination and courage,’ he said. ‘Europe must understand its strength.’… 

“Alexseev, a professor of political science at San Diego State University,… discussed the pressure European leaders face… ‘Well, I hope that they [European leaders] realize that we’re witnessing a major shift in global politics, that the discussion in the Oval Office was not just a spat between two leaders. It signaled a major realignment of the United States away from Europe, and we can no longer take for granted US security guarantees probably not just for Ukraine, but for NATO as well.’ Alexseev said that since Trump came to office, the US ‘has offered major concessions to Russia but put all the pressure on Ukraine.’ 

“The political science professor argued that Trump was trying to appease Russian President Vladimir Putin, rather than his stated aim of reaching peace [and] that ‘the primary goal for Trump is to rehabilitate Putin and to open the door for lucrative deals with Russia, which right now maybe seem to be hampered by the fact that Russia is under sanctions because it launched this brutal all-out war against Ukraine.’… 

“The officer in charge of Germany’s Field Army, Lieutenant General Harald Gante, said the country needs to reintroduce conscription to meet its defense needs. He told the German news agency dpa that the Bundeswehr cannot rely solely on volunteers… The Bundeswehr is awaiting the government’s decision on reintroducing military service, which was suspended in 2011…” 

Leaving NATO and the UN? 

The New York Post wrote on March 2: 

“Elon Musk backed calls for the US to withdraw from NATO and the United Nations after months of badmouthing the two international organizations. ‘I agree,’ Musk, 53, wrote on X in reply late Saturday to MAGA influencer Gunther Eagleman’s suggestion that ‘It’s time to leave NATO and the UN.’ 

“Musk did not elaborate on the specifics of why he wants the US to pull out of NATO and the UN, but the suggestion came after several social media users pointed to Sen. Mike Lee’s (R-Utah) call to pull out of both. Last month, Lee, 53, who has drawn frequent reposts and interactions from Musk on X, introduced legislation alongside other lawmakers to pull out of the UN and decried it as ‘a platform for tyrants and a venue to attack America and her allies.’ On Saturday, Lee publicly suggested that the US pull out of NATO, pointing to Norwegian fuel supplier Haltbakk Bunkers’ announcement that it would stop helping the US Navy refuel in protest of President Trump’s confrontation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Friday. ‘Europe doesn’t love us,’ Lee chided on X Saturday. ‘Let’s leave NATO.’… 

“Musk is known to have Trump’s ear, serving as a ‘special employee’ at the White House and informal boss of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)… While Musk didn’t delve into his rationale on Saturday, in the past, Musk has argued that the US makes up a disproportionate amount of NATO’s power and has questioned why NATO continued to exist after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Musk has also previously asserted that the US spends too much money on the UN… 

“Trump has publicly demanded NATO allies spend vastly more on defense and accused European nations of taking advantage of America’s military umbrella. Last month, he also cut off funding for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees and pulled out of the UN Human Rights Council.” 

These comments are interesting in light of the following article. 

Tariffs for Europe 

Newsmax wrote on February 26: 

“President Donald Trump said Wednesday during his first Cabinet meeting that the European Union was formed to take advantage of the United States and that his administration soon will be announcing tariffs of 25% on the 27-nation bloc… 

“‘the European Union was formed in order to screw the United States. I mean, look, let’s be honest, the European Union was formed in order to screw the United States. That’s the purpose of it. And they’ve done a good job of it. But now I’m president.’”

China Ready for “War”!

BBC reported on March 5:

“China has warned the US it is ready to fight ‘any type’ of war after hitting back against President Donald Trump’s mounting trade tariffs.

“The world’s top two economies have edged closer to a trade war after Trump slapped more tariffs on all Chinese goods. China quickly retaliated imposing 10-15% tariffs on US farm products.

’If war is what the US wants, be it a tariff war, a trade war or any other type of war, we’re ready to fight till the end,’ China’s embassy said on X, reposting a line from a government statement on Tuesday.

“It is some of the strongest rhetoric so far from China since Trump became president and comes as leaders gathered in Beijing for the annual National People’s Congress.”

Trump’s Big Speech

BBC wrote on March 5:

“US President Donald Trump declared “the American Dream is unstoppable’ as he addressed a raucous joint session of Congress for the first time since he returned to power.

“In the longest presidential speech to lawmakers on record, he outlined his vision for his second term, as Republicans applauded a high-octane six weeks that has reshaped domestic and foreign policy.

“Trump was heckled by Democrats and he goaded them in turn during the rowdy primetime address, during which he said his administration was “just getting started”.

“The Republican president has moved to slash the federal workforce and crack down on immigration, while imposing tariffs on the US’s biggest trading partners and shaking up the transatlantic alliance over the war in Ukraine

Sadly, President Trump’s vision for America is not the same as prophetic scriptures in the Bible so clearly warn. 

Trump’s Surreal AI-Generated Video Depicts Gaza As A Luxury Resort Destination 

Forbes wrote on February 26: 

“President Donald Trump has shared an AI-generated video showing a transformed Gaza Strip featuring golden Trump statues, luxury beachfront developments and bearded belly dancers… The AI-generated clip… begins with scenes of destruction before transitioning to a reimagined Gaza featuring Dubai-style skyscrapers, luxury hotels and pristine beaches, before numerous surreal elements are portrayed. These include a towering golden statue of Trump, children carrying golden Trump balloons, buildings emblazoned with ‘Trump Gaza,’ and Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu lounging poolside with cocktails. 

“Elon Musk… also appears several times in the video, eating on a beach and throwing dollar bills into the air as apparent Tesla vehicles drive through the streets. Throughout the video, a song plays with the lyrics: ‘Donald’s coming to set you free, bringing the light for all to see, no more tunnels, no more fear, Trump Gaza’s finally here. Trump Gaza shining bright, golden future a brand new light. Feast and dance the deal is done, Trump Gaza number one.’… 

“The video release follows Trump’s Febr. 4 announcement of a controversial plan for Gaza, where he stated that ‘The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip and we will do a job with it, too. We’ll own it.’ Trump described his vision as turning Gaza into ‘the Riviera of the Middle East’ and his plan would reportedly involve relocating Gaza’s approximately 2 million Palestinian residents to neighboring countries…

“The surreal video has garnered widespread criticism, with even Truth Social users responding with mixed reactions. Direct quotes from commenters include: ‘I hate this. I love our president, but this is horrible,’ and ‘I don’t think that’s funny or cool. Sorry. Am I missing something??? I hope it’s a joke, a bad joke.’ Another user commented: ‘You’re doing great Mr President. But don’t let it get to your head. God put you in that position for His Glory, not yours.” 

The golden statue of Nebuchadnezzar in Daniel 3 comes to mind. 

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News

Boris Johnson vs. Trump 

Daily Mail published the following article by Boris Johnson on February 21: 

“They know full well that saying Ukraine ‘started the war’ is like blaming the defenceless young woman at the beginning of the movie Jaws and claiming that she takes off her clothes and skips into the moonlit sea with the specific intention of attacking the great white shark. It’s like saying that American ships brutally fired on Japanese Zeroes at Pearl Harbor. It’s Orwellian, bonkers, an inversion of the truth, and they know it. It’s victim-blaming rubbish to say that Ukraine was in any way responsible for the three years of carnage, and it is also rubbish to say that Vladimir Putin was ‘provoked’ by Nato…

 “Putin launched his war not because he was worried about Nato – that’s pure Kremlin propaganda – but because he is a ruthless opportunist, who had been in power for two decades, and who thought he could revive his political fortunes with a short, sharp war to rebuild the Russian empire.  He thought that the Ukrainians would rapidly surrender, and that the West would spinelessly acquiesce, as we had during the annexation of Crimea in 2014.

 “… everybody can see that Volodymyr Zelensky is not a dictator but a democrat courageously defending his country against an aggressor… we need to remember whose side the Ukrainians are on. They are on our side. They are on the side of freedom… In this war there is not a shred of moral equivalence between Ukraine and Russia…’

 Trump needs to be careful that he is not losing the support of his closest allies.

 Words of War Intensify

 The Daily Mail wrote on February 21: 

“Trump has claimed Sir Keir Starmer [and Emmanuel Macron]  ‘didn’t do anything’ to end the Ukraine war. The US President lashed out at Sir Keir and … Emmanuel Macron amid a transatlantic spat over Mr Trump branding Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky a ‘dictator’. Those comments riled both the PM and French President, who hit back at Mr Trump’s attack on the Ukrainian President and doubled down on their support for Kyiv… This comes after Mr Trump said in an interview with Fox News he didn’t think it was ‘very important’ for Zelensky to be involved in peace talks as ‘he’s been there for three years’ and that he ‘makes it very hard to make deals’… he suggested the Russian President ‘doesn’t have to make a deal’ because he could complete a total invasion of Ukraine ‘if he wanted’… 

“In his radio interview, Mr Trump also appeared to move away from his previous astonishing remarks in which he falsely blamed Kyiv for having ‘started’ the conflict. ‘Russia attacked, but there was no reason for them to attack.’ Mr Trump said… Billionaire tech mogul Elon Musk, an ally of Mr Trump, yesterday joined attacks on Mr Zelensky by claiming he runs a ‘fraud machine feeding off dead bodies of soldiers.’ [He also called him a “despised dictator.”] 

“But Keith Kellogg, the US President’s envoy to Russia and Ukraine, struck a different tone today following a trip to Kyiv. In a post on Mr Musk’s social media site X, the retired lieutenant general said he had had a ‘long and intense day with the senior leadership of Ukraine’. This included ‘extensive and positive discussions’ with Mr Zelensky, who he praised as ‘the embattled and courageous leader of a nation at war.”’ 

What is really going on behind the scenes? 

Very Personal 

The Sun in the UK wrote on February 21: 

“As negotiations have continued over finding a peace deal in Ukraine, the relationship between the two have only worsened. Their personal spats have spilled over into the public eye in recent weeks. 

“Zelensky has even been urged to flee Ukraine ‘immediately’ amid escalating tensions between Washington and Kyiv, insiders in the White House warned… 

“Asked about the growing tensions between the US and Kyiv, another source close to the White House said the public spat was a long-time coming… Trump’s smearing of the Ukraine regime as scam artists who provoked a war using US taxpayers’ money is a rant beneath the dignity of his office. Almost nothing in it is true… 

“It is an unprecedentedly shocking statement from the President of the United States… It is troubling and short-sighted in the extreme for the so-called leader of the free world to have no interest in a war ­raging in Europe because he is separated from it by the Atlantic. America is not a business…  is the most powerful democracy on Earth with global responsibilities and — let’s be frank — a duty to discern right from wrong with absolute moral clarity.” 

Even the pro-Trump media and pro-Trump commentators are standing up to Trump. 

Mark Levin Defies Trump 

Mediaite wrote on February 20: 

Fox News’ Mark Levin delivered an implicit rebuke of President Donald Trump’s rhetoric about the ongoing war between Russian and Ukraine on Wednesday, debunking a series of false and misleading claims made by the president. On his radio show, Levin delivered a history lesson on Russian dictator Vladimir Putin’s rise to power and various crimes, while going to bat for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky… 

“‘Now look, I don’t have a problem if it’s the position of our administration to cut back on support for Ukraine — which I oppose, by the way — then so be it. Elections have consequences, so be it. But I want to make sure the facts are on the table and you, the American people, draw your own conclusion,’ began Levin, submitting that ‘MAGA doesn’t support Putin.’ ‘Zelensky ordered martial law — that’s what the constitution there compelled. Zelensky hasn’t called for an election — that’s what the constitution there compels. he continued. ‘Now, I’m waiting for the first free election for Vladimir Putin. I mean, this is almost comical in a sick way that Putin is demanding an election. Why is he demanding an election in Ukraine when he doesn’t have free and real elections in his own country? And why does he-, why does he get to call the shots when in fact, he murders people who dare to challenge him?’… 

“‘Zelensky’s latest poll, he’s at 57%,’ noted the conservative commentator just one day after Trump claimed that Zelensky’s approval rating sat at 4%. ‘The parliament — with all parties in the parliament — support what he’s doing. They’re trying to survive. Ukraine did not invade Russia. Russia invaded Ukraine… Eighty-one percent of the American people do not trust Putin because 81% of the American people are smart,’ continued Levin… 

“Trump’s comments have been criticized a wide range of voices, including many on the right. But Levin’s remarks are particularly notable given his long history of supporting the president…” 

The New York Post Draws the Line 

Mediaite wrote on February 21:

“The New York Post pushed back on President Donald Trump’s quip that Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky is a ‘dictator’ with a full front cover image of Russian President Vladimir Putin and an all-caps headline declaring: “THIS IS A DICTATOR.”… The Post… a conservative powerhouse and Trump-ally Rupert Murdoch’s flagship newspaper, has drawn a sharp line in the sand over Ukraine… The cover was praised by other Trump-supporting media personalities who have taken issue with the Ukraine pivot, like journalist Piers Morgan… 

“The move follows a week of criticism from The Post’s editorial board itself, taking direct aim on Trump comments beginning Wednesday… ‘Whatever negotiating tactics Trump cares to use, turning the truth completely upside down ought to be beneath him.’”

No Minerals Deal… USA Blames Zelensky 

The Sun wrote on February 22: 

“Zelensky is reportedly not ready to accept the ‘problematic’ offer from the US. The [minerals] deal proposed by Trump’s team would see Kyiv hand over billions of dollars of minerals to Washington DC in exchange for weapons… And it comes as the split between the US and Ukraine is widening, with some White House officials raging Zelensky would be ‘six feet under’ without them… 

“Kyiv officials are however standing firm, reports Sky News, with some sources saying US and Ukrainian officials had spent ‘all night’ negotiating on Thursday into the early hours of Friday. A source said: ‘The agreement is not yet ready to be signed, there are a number of problematic issues, and in the current form of the draft, the president is not ready to accept it. Today, the drafts do not reflect a partnership in the agreement and contain only unilateral commitments by Ukraine.’ 

“The White House view is that Zelensky grew too accustomed to unwavering support under former President Joe Biden, including billions in military aid and NATO backing. Now, Trump’s inner circle believes the Ukrainian leader has overstepped, reports Axios. ‘We created a monster with Zelensky,’ another administration official said. ‘And these Trump-deranged Europeans who won’t send troops are giving him terrible advice.’… 

“‘In the course of a week, Zelensky rebuffed President Trump’s treasury secretary, his secretary of state and his vice president, all before moving on to personally insulting President Trump in the press,’ one official said. The US President also blasted Zelensky’s wartime leadership, calling him a ‘modestly successful comedian’ who must ‘move fast or he is not going to have a country left.’

“Russian President… Putin wasted no time seizing on the growing US-Ukraine rift, praising Trump for ‘changing his position’…”

Trying to appease Putin would be a colossal mistake. 

No Guarantees for Ukraine

The Daily Mail added on February 22:

“Ukraine claims to have Europe’s largest reserves of titanium – used to produce alloys for aircraft and naval vessels, and lithium, a commodity that is becoming increasingly valuable amid global demand for batteries – particularly in electric vehicles. The war-torn country also has deposits of rare earth minerals that are essential in high-tech industries, including defense and clean energy. The minerals are especially valuable to the US amid growing tensions with China, which controls vast portions of the global supply. 

“Zelensky furiously lashed out at the initial proposal, claiming that it was too vague and demanded a 50 percent share of Ukraine’s mineral deposits. He said that Trump was demanding $500 billion worth of the minerals – which was far beyond America’s total contribution to the Ukraine war effort of $100 billion. … Ukraine has trillions of dollars worth of natural resources… though many are found in the industrial heartlands in the east, currently occupied by Russia… Zelensky told reporters later Monday that any US-Ukraine economic treaty must see security guarantees… adding that his country was not just a ‘simple supplier of raw materials’… 

“An analysis of the contract’s terms by the Telegraph concluded that, if the terms of the draft dated February 7, 2025 draft were accepted by Ukraine, Trump’s demands would amount to a higher share of Ukrainian GDP than reparations imposed on Germany following World War I…

“Reuters also reported that American negotiators said they may cut Kyiv’s access to Elon Musk’s Starlink, which has been heavily relied on for civilian and military use, if it did not agree to the mineral rights deal… ‘Ukraine runs on Starlink. They consider it their North Star,’ said the source. ‘Losing Starlink … would be a massive blow.’…”

Ukraine Agrees to Mineral Deal… Sort of…

The Financial Times wrote on February 25:

“Ukrainian officials say Kyiv is now ready to sign the agreement on jointly developing its mineral resources, including oil and gas, after the US dropped demands for a right to $500bn in potential revenue from exploiting the resources.

“Although the text lacks explicit security guarantees, the officials argued that they had negotiated far more favourable terms and depicted the deal as a way of broadening the relationship with the US to shore up Ukraine’s prospects after three years of war…

“The final version of the agreement, dated February 24 and seen by the FT, would establish a fund into which Ukraine would contribute 50 per cent of proceeds from the ‘future monetisation’ of state-owned mineral resources, including oil and gas, and associated logistics. The fund would invest in projects in Ukraine….

“However, the agreement omits any reference to US security guarantees which Kyiv had originally insisted on in return for agreeing to the deal. It also leaves crucial questions such as the size of the US stake in the fund and the terms of “joint ownership” deals to be hashed out in follow-up agreements.

“Ukrainian officials said the deal had been approved by the justice, economy and foreign ministers, and held out the prospect of Zelenskyy travelling to the White House… for a signing ceremony with Trump…”

We will wait and see what is coming out of that one…

USA Declines to Sponsor UN Resolution

Newsweek wrote on February 20:

“The United States is declining to co-sponsor a draft [UN] resolution… [which] reaffirms the need for full implementation of past U.N. resolutions, particularly the demand for Russia to immediately and unconditionally withdraw its military forces from Ukraine’s internationally recognized territory. Russia currently controls about 20 percent of Ukraine and continues to gain ground in the east.”

The USA submitted their own version, greatly exonerating Putin. It does not refer to Putin as an “aggressor,” and it does not demand Russia to withdraw from Ukrainian territory nor does it establish Ukraine’s independent sovereignty. This version will have no chance of acceptance. The irony is that we know from the Bible that ultimately, Russia and Ukraine will unite.

Trump’s Attacks on Ukraine So Wrong!

Die Welt wrote on February 23:

“On Monday it will be three years since Russia unleashed a war.

“Donald Trump’s attacks on Ukraine and its president are so wrong that from now on we have to reckon with everything. And they lead to historical comparisons that hurt.”

RFK Issues Two Bombshell Orders on Vaccines 

Daily Mail wrote on February 21: 

“Robert F Kennedy Jr has pulled promotional ads for vaccines and postponed a meeting of key vaccine advisors, in one of his first moves as health secretary.

“Kennedy ordered the CDC to scrub its digital ‘Wild to Mild’ flu vaccine campaign that juxtaposed a lion next to a kitten as an analogy for how the shot ‘tames’ the virus. But Kennedy wants the CDC to move away from nudge tactics and focus its vaccine communications on ‘informed consent’ – which involves telling the patient the medical risks and benefits and letting them come to their own decision.

“Meanwhile, the year’s first meeting of the CDC’s influential panel of vaccine experts has been delayed indefinitely, marking the first time the meeting has been postponed in over 40 years, except for during the emergency Covid pandemic… Mr Kennedy told HHS staff that ‘nothing is off limits’ when it comes to pinpointing the leading causes of chronic illnesses in children, including alterations to national vaccine recommendations.”

This is a good start. Hopefully, it will continue at full speed. 

Another Trump “Plan” to Deal With Immigrants

Newsmax wrote on February 25:

“Illegal immigrants in the U.S., including children 14 and older, will be required to submit personal information, such as fingerprints and home addresses, to a registry under a plan being considered by the Trump administration… Previously, illegal immigrants were committing a civil offense and could be detained and deported but weren’t considered to have committed a crime…

“A law passed in 1940 created an immigrant registry to catch suspected communists, and the government aired TV ads reminding all immigrants, including permanent residents, to register annually at local post offices… By the 1960s, the government decided it was too costly and provided little benefit.

“Trump’s planned registry would require anyone in the country illegally who hasn’t interacted with the government, such as by applying for asylum or a work permit, to come forward. The administration plans to create a registration form and give them 30 days to complete it after the registry is established…

“President George W. Bush created a similar immigration registry after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, when his administration required men and boys from predominantly Muslim countries to submit photographs and fingerprints to the federal government… Tens of thousands of people who registered under that program were arrested and deported.”

These are frightening developments. 

Brazil Censors Rumble 

Deutsche Welle wrote on February 22:

“Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes ordered video sharing platform Rumble to be taken offline in the Latin American country within 24 hours. In his decision, Moraes said Rumble has not complied with court orders, such as appointing a legal representative for Brazil…

“In response, Rumble said the platform is experiencing ‘unprecedented censorship in Brazil.’ The company, which has headquarters in both Canada and Florida, said Morae’s orders are ‘in response to our refusal to censor political dissidents residing in the United States.’… Rumble is responsible for the back-services for [Trump’s] Truth Social media site…. A venture capital company co-founded by current Vice President JD Vance invested in Rumble in 2021…

“The crackdown on Rumble in Brazil comes after Moraes ordered the suspension of Elon Musk’s x, also for failing to appoint a legal representative in the country.  Although Musk was angered by the order, the company eventually complied with Moraes’ demands around a month later, with X being brought back online in Brazil… Moraes is a powerful figure in Brazilian politics.” 

Trump Backpedals on Gaza

JTA wrote on February 21:

“President Donald Trump said Friday he would ‘recommend’ — but was ‘not forcing’ — his plan to depopulate the Gaza Strip and have the United States take it over, as Arab states have roundly rejected the idea and tensions mount over the Israel-Hamas ceasefire and hostage release deal… ‘I think that’s the plan that really works,’ Trump said. ‘But I’m not forcing it. I’m just going to sit back and recommend it’…

“Trump has predicted that Arab states would come around to the idea of depopulating Gaza, but they have not…” 

Our Politics Is a Disgrace 

Bild Online wrote on February 21:

“The Palestinians of Hamas know no boundaries: the planned, annihilating terrorist slaughter of October 7, 2023. The display of corpses and hostages, the triumphal processions for child butchers in the Gaza Strip. Medieval gauntlet running for the kidnapped and abused. Dark bunker dungeons for more than a year. Then the ‘release’ by Hamas as the ultimate humiliation: the hostages were used as propaganda puppets. And on German streets, from the far left to the center, they are demonstrating FOR Hamas and the Palestinians. FOR terrorists. AGAINST Jews, AGAINST the State of Israel. And our state is still giving money there – directly and indirectly. We are still handing out double passes to the enemies of Israel and our way of life…

“Now the German-Israeli Bibas family has been wiped out. Two small children: murdered by Hamas while they were being held hostage ‘with their bare hands,’ as the Israeli army now says. Cold-blooded. Who can do that? Who has the heart to do that? They are the barbarians who killed babies in the womb on kibbitzes so that no Jews would grow back. And these barbarians hand over the wrong body – it’s not the mother… [But the dead mother, brutally murdered by Hamas, allegedly while in captivity, was subsequently handed over to Israel.]

“If their abduction did not lead to any recognizable action by our federal government, then what does their death lead to, and what follows from the disgusting game with Shiri’s remains? Audible: nothing. Once again nothing concrete…

“As Foreign Minister, Frank-Walter Steinmeier was one of these political moral preachers. As our Federal President, he regularly and quite rightly speaks of… Israel’s right to exist. But what does all this mean? How far is he willing to go? Is there more than just Sunday speeches? When will the man… demand real consequences from the federal government?” 

Not Like Germany, Please!

The New York Post wrote on February 21:

“The First Amendment is our sacred safeguard against becoming a censorious hellscape — like Germany, where insulting a politician can land you in prison. Even supposedly ‘free’ Western countries are liable to crack down on free speech at a moment’s notice… It should make us all grateful that expressive rights are enshrined in our Constitution. But it’s also a reminder of how vigilant we need to be to ensure we don’t succumb to the same censorious fate. As Germany demonstrates, banning ‘hate speech’ is a slippery slope to abandoning free speech altogether…. 

“… once you open the door to prosecuting ‘hate speech,’ you no longer actually have free speech. ‘Hate speech’ is an amorphous term that can be defined differently by every judge, every prosecutor, and every individual. The crackdown on ‘hate speech’ in Germany has been applied in some pretty laughable contexts…”

These concerns are justified. It starts with censoring and prohibiting free speech, burning books, and what is next?

Needed: A European Army 

Vg-no wrote on February 25:

“We have no choice. The EU must become one united state. Should we have 27 different armies, and be feared by no one, or should we unite into a superpower that no one dares to threaten. That’s what Guillaume Ancel asks. He has fought as a French military officer in Rwanda, Cambodia and Bosnia for over 20 years. Now he wants to use his legitimacy as a military expert to promote a European federation , the United States of Europe, or USE.

“We knew we were threatened by Putin’s Russia, but now we discover we are threatened by Trump’s USA. And tomorrow it will be Xi Jinping’s China, he says… So the answer is simple, he believes: A federal structure, a democratically elected president, and a joint army. Under this force, France’s nuclear weapons would become Europe’s nuclear weapons, Ancel says… Ancel believes it will take courage for EU countries to give up their sovereignty , but that it is the only option.”

Germany’s Next Government

The Guardian wrote on February 23, 2025:

“… veteran political ­analyst Herfried Münkler… wrote in the newspaper Die Zeit… ‘The next government will have to take great pains to reassert German leadership in Europe.’… Merz (CDU) has said he aims to build a new ­governing ­alliance by Easter, setting up long weeks of tense negotiations in which Germany will be focused inward.

“His most likely partner will be Scholz’s Social Democrats…”

Report 24 speculated on February 23 that sooner or later, the CDU will collaborate with the AfD. In the past, the AfD claimed on occasion that Merz is more right-wing and conservative than even the AfD.

Trump Does Not Care For Germany

Bild Online wrote on February 22:

“US President Donald Trump has a new message for the Germans. And it goes something like this: I don’t care about you – nor about your new government… When he was asked in the White House on Friday afternoon to comment on the federal election, he shrugged off: ‘I wish you luck.’ Then he added with a grin: ‘We have our own problems here.’…

“No other US president in post-war history has ever made such a succinct statement about the Federal Republic or made it so obvious that Germany is a side note for them. This makes it clear: Germany cannot expect any leniency in the impending tariff war and must fear for the military protection of the USA.

“Trump doesn’t like Germany… He certainly didn’t like Angela Merkel… He said about the Chancellor: ‘She’s crazy. She is ruining Germany.’ What was meant was her asylum policy.”

Or Does He?

Deutsche Welle wrote on February 23:

“US President Donald Trump on Sunday said that a victory by conservatives was a good thing for Germany and the world. Writing on his Truth social platform, Trump said, ‘Much like the USA, the people of Germany got tired of the no common sense agenda, especially on energy and immigration, that has prevailed for so many years.’

‘‘This is a great day for Germany, and for the United States of America under the leadership of a gentleman named Donald J. Trump,’ he continued, adding, ‘Congratulations to all — many more victories to follow!!!’…”

However, Germany’s immediate future does not look rosy.

What Now?

Deutsche Welle wrote on February 23:

“Alice Weidel, leader of the AfD… said the AfD is prepared to enter a coalition government… But given that the CDU and other major parties have ruled out working with the AfD…, Weidel claims that the CDU have effectively adopted most of the AfD’s manifesto and says: ‘They’re going to have to explain to their voters how they’re going to implement those promises while working with left-wing parties. If they form a government with the SPD and Greens, then interim chancellor Merz won’t last four years.’…

“To form a government, a majority of at least 316 seats out of the 630 seats in the Bundestag is needed. A coalition between CDU and AfD would have been possible numerically, as both parties easily pass this threshold, adding up to 358. But according to conservative leader Friedrich Merz, this is out of the question. That leaves Olaf Scholz’s SPD as a possible partner, which together with CDU scrape by with 328 seats. A bigger majority could be formed if CDU were to add the Greens to the mix, reaching 416. But the CDU’s junior partner CSU has repeatedly ruled out governing with the Greens…  Theoretically, the CDU could also lead a 3-party coalition that includes SPD and the Left party, but this is highly unlikely given very deep ideological differences between the conservatives and the far-left faction…”

“Friedrich Merz sharply criticized Donald Trump’s administration and urged Europe to distance from Washington during a post-election panel airing on state broadcaster ARD….”

The CDU won, followed by the AfD, the SPD, the Green party and the Left. The left-leaning BSW [under Sahra Wagenknecht; the BSW is different from the Left party and broke away from it] and the FDP did not make the 5% hurdle. Current Defense Minister Boris Pistorius (SPD) announced that he would be willing to negotiate about a leadership role within a new government. The SPD under Scholz suffered the most devastating defeat since World War II. The CDU did not do as well as they had hoped.

However one wants to look at it… this election hasn’t changed much and Germany’s current downfall may continue for a while. Bottom line: Another disaster! No wonder that according to Focus, many Germans complain that their lives won’t be better after the election.

AfD’s Big Success

Reuters wrote on February 23:

“The Alternative for Germany, which has morphed since it was founded in 2013 from a party of libertarian economists to an anti-immigration, pro-Russia group, [has] won the backing of one-in-five Germans… AfD leader Alice Weidel told supporters… that it would be tantamount to ‘electoral fraud’ if the first-placed conservatives chose to govern with left-wing parties rather than them. If that happened, she said, ‘next time we’ll come first.’ Weidel, the leader of a nativist party that preaches traditional family values while raising her children with a Swiss-based woman of Sri Lankan background, said the AfD was now ‘a mainstream party’…

“One leading figure is regional boss Bjoern Hoecke… [The AfD] became the largest party in Hoecke’s home state of Thuringia last year, and did sufficiently well elsewhere that only improbable and tricky coalitions of centre-right and far left could keep them out of office…

“The president of Germany’s Central Jewish Council, Josef Schuster, told Welt newspaper he was shocked at the strength of the AfD’s result…”

Even though the positions of the AfD change from time, they recently announced that they are for the reinstatement of a mandatory 2-year military service, and, according to the article above, “drastically restricting migration, disbanding the European Union and dropping support for Ukraine in its war with Russia.” They have also suggested, however, to replace the EU with a more limited group of like-minded core nations.

Austria’s FPÖ Congratulates

Report 24 wrote on February 23:

“FPÖ leader Herbert Kickl sent… a heartfelt congratulation [to Alice Weidel from the AfD]…

“’The patriotic turnaround is well underway and it cannot be stopped, but only delayed, because it is supported by honest love for the homeland, for one’s own people, for freedom and for the truth!'”

Merz Backtracks on Borders

Breitbart wrote on February 25:

“Hours after his party’s victory in Germany’s federal elections, likely incoming chancellor Friedrich Merz began to soften his stance on immigration as he looks to form a coalition with leftist parties rather than the anti-mass migration Alternative for Germany…

“While Merz campaigned as a supposed immigration hardliner, [he] appears to be following the tradition of notionally right-wing politicians abandoning their election-time promises once the votes have been counted.”

Merz— Corporate King in Conservative Clothing

UnHerd wrote on February 22, 2025:

“At the ripe age of 69, Friedrich Merz has waited decades for this moment… he is Germany’s chancellor-in-waiting… He’ll have to cobble together another coalition of disparate parties, but Merz won’t mind. Come Monday morning, he will have completed one of the most remarkable comebacks in recent political history… he is effectively running on a ‘Make Germany Great Again’ platform — a calculated attempt to win votes from the Alternative for Germany (AfD) by shifting his party to the Right on issues such as immigration. His cynicism here shouldn’t be underestimated: like Donald Trump in America, the millionaire Merz is a corporate king in conservative clothing.

“Merz… has long represented the interests of some of the world’s most powerful corporate and financial elites, most notably as a key representative of BlackRock in Germany between 2016 and 2020. Indeed,… Germany will become the first country to be ruled by a former BlackRock official. But his ties to elite institutions go back much further: for over two decades, even before joining BlackRock, he embodied the revolving door between politics, business and finance… Pharmaceuticals, entertainment, media and, of course, war — there is virtually no sector that BlackRock won’t try and profit from… Under Merz’s influence, for instance, BlackRock became one of the largest non-German shareholders in many of the country’s most important companies — from Deutsche Bank to Volkswagen, BMW to Siemens. Yet his work wasn’t just about increasing profits for shareholders; it was also about shaping a political environment where corporate interests were aligned with government policy…

“But then it’s hard to truly believe that ordinary Germans are Merz’s concern. Once a Davos Man, always a Davos Man — and his long history of representing powerful industries, including the chemical, financial and metallurgic sectors, suggests he will have other priorities. As chancellor, for instance, Merz could be called upon to regulate sectors with which he has long been associated…

“Recall, too, that under Merz’s leadership the CDU has received millions of euros in campaign donations from the very business interests he represented in the past… For both German and global corporate lobbyists, then, having Merz — a former colleague — as chancellor would be a dream come true. Or, as [finance expert Werner] Rügemer puts it: ‘This is putting the fox in charge of the henhouse.’

“Merz’s corporate connections shape his foreign policy as well. At heart, he’s… a firm believer in America’s role as the guarantor of the global order. This ideological stance has led Merz to align with the US on issues such as the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, calling for the project’s cancellation long before the escalation of the Ukraine crisis… Now, of course, Washington has a very different Ukraine policy. So will Merz be forced to abandon his Atlanticist beliefs? Not necessarily. Though his strong anti-Russian stance and militaristic tendencies seem at odds with Trump’s efforts to de-escalate the conflict, the reality is that their visions are more aligned than might initially seem to be the case.

“What, in the end, does Trump demand from Europe? Higher defence spending and a significant role in shouldering both the financial and strategic responsibilities for post-war security in Ukraine, something which could even involve the deployment of a European ‘peacekeeping’ force. These policies align neatly with Merz’s own vision. He has long advocated boosting Germany’s defence budget, a stance welcomed by his corporate allies in the German military-industrial complex. Now, in fact, he has joined the chorus calling for Europe to ‘take its security into its own hands’. Trump couldn’t ask for more. This strategic convergence, coupled with Merz’s conservative leanings, deep ties to the US financial and corporate sectors, and ingrained Atlanticism, all make him well-placed to become America’s European ‘vassal-in-chief’ in our post-liberal era. This would place Germany back at the helm of a European Union that is both economically weaker and militarily emboldened — even as it remains strategically adrift.

“This arrangement will be accompanied by much rhetoric about German and European ‘autonomy’ — and possibly even heated public disagreements between Berlin and Washington. In reality, though, it would largely be a façade, for the new dynamic would merely serve European and American elites. The former would continue to stoke the fear of Russia as a means to justify more defence spending, directing funds away from social programmes and legitimising their continued crackdown on democracy. As for the latter, they would continue benefiting from Europe’s economic dependence on the US…

“Not that we should be surprised. Over the past two decades, Merz, just like Trump, has proved himself a businessman first and a politician second. Yet unlike Trump, who at least has some populist credentials, Merz’s victory will be celebrated in the boardrooms of BlackRock and other major corporations, which can expect to see their bank balances start ticking steadily upwards. As so often, though, ordinary voters should not expect this bounty to flow their way.”

We are citing below the following article about Merz, which was published in 2018, but which is as relevant today as it was then.

Friedrich Merz and BlackRock

On November 29, 2018, Deutsche Welle wrote about Friedrich Merz who tried to replace Angela Merkel as Chancellor before, but his attempt failed:

“The sheer scale of BlackRock’s finances makes its influence on the world unlike that of any other company. Now one of its board members in Germany, Friedrich Merz, wants to succeed Chancellor Angela Merkel… If successful, he would be the first German leader to come directly out of the so-called shadow banking system, and the first leader to have previously been a highly paid lobbyist for a global financial institution.

Shadow banks are generally defined as financial institutions that work like banks but aren’t subject to the same regulatory systems. Their growing power, which dwarfs the likes of Amazon, Facebook and Google (all of which BlackRock invests money in) means that financial market speculation has become one of the biggest movers of money in the world. Many critics of the market system believe this destabilizes the world economy by incentivizing risk, the trade in bad loans, and investing via unregulated markets, known as ‘dark pools.’ The rise of shadow banking has been blamed for causing the subprime mortgage catastrophe of 2007-2008 and the global recession that followed.

“Merz heads the supervisory board of the German branch of BlackRock, the biggest asset management corporation in the world, which controls some $6.3 trillion (€5.56 trillion) in assets — twice Germany’s gross domestic product. Two venerable German researchers, political scientist Peter Grottian and finance expert Werner Rügemer, appeared in Berlin on Wednesday to warn against letting Merz take control of the German government…

“BlackRock’s activities have attracted the attention of the authorities. Police searched BlackRock’s offices in Munich earlier this month as part of an investigation into the ‘cum-ex’ tax evasion scandal, which cost European taxpayers some €55 billion. That investigation is related to the period from 2007 to 2011, five years before Merz joined the company…

“‘There has never been a company like BlackRock before,’ said Heike Buchter, who published a book on the company in 2015, in a recent interview with the IPG Journal. ‘No one else has comparable access to companies, governments, regulators and central banks than BlackRock.’… During his career as a Bundestag member, he opposed the minimum wage and argued for cutting social benefits and limiting the power of trade unions. His possible ascension to the chancellery would therefore grant the financial power broker unprecedented control of Europe’s largest economy.”

Merz Challenges von der Leyen

Politico wrote on February 21:

“Ursula von der Leyen is about to face the most serious challenge to her leadership since she became European Commission president six years ago… ]Merz] has made no secret of his plans to weigh in much more heavily on EU affairs than his predecessor, Olaf Scholz…  ‘The EU must not come to Washington as a dwarf — because then it will be treated as one,’ Merz told a recent campaign event in Germany.

“The signal from Berlin that Germany is ready to take on more leadership in the European Union should be welcome news for von der Leyen, who stands to gain a powerful conservative ally that happens to be well versed in EU affairs (Merz was a European lawmaker from 1989 to 1994). In Brussels, you’ll even often hear grumbling that a victory for Merz will simply mean that the EU will be run by two German Christian Democrats.

“But a closer look suggests that ‘Queen Ursula’… is unlikely to share the stage easily with the CDU leader. Von der Leyen, 66, has reigned supreme in Brussels ever since former German Chancellor Angela Merkel, her political patron, helped to catapult her into the powerful executive role in 2019. Indeed, while von der Leyen was promoted to defense minister under Merkel, Merz was shunted aside and quit politics to work as a corporate lawyer.

“Von der Leyen has taken advantage of French President Emmanuel Macron and Scholz’s relative weakness to accrue influence, centralizing the bloc’s response to the Covid pandemic and Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Now she’ll have to contend with one of Merkel’s fiercest rivals in the CDU, a connoisseur of EU affairs who will loom large as the most powerful conservative at the European leaders’ table, where he intends to increase the power of capitals at Brussels’ expense…” 

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News

Zelensky Calls for Creation of ‘European Armed Forces’ at Munich Security Conference 

Breitbart wrote on February 16: 

“While the Trump administration has drawn feigned outrage throughout European capitals for daring to suggest that they meet their NATO defence spending obligations, President Zelensky was hailed with applause at the Munich Security Conference as he called for an international European army. Zelensky argued that a European army would be necessary for Europe to take back its own destiny and to ensure its safety if America refused to come to its rescue. ‘Let’s be honest, now we can’t rule out the possibility that America might say “no” to Europe on an issue that might threaten it. Many leaders have talked about a Europe that needs its own military, an army of Europe. And I really believe that the time has come for the Armed Forces of Europe to be created,’ Zelensky said. 

“The Ukraine leader said per the AP that ‘three years of full-scale war have proven that we already have the foundation for a united European military force. And now, as we fight this war and lay the groundwork for peace and security, we must build the armed forces of Europe.’..  ‘A few days ago, President Trump told me about his conversation with Putin. Not once did he mention that America needs Europe at the table. That says a lot,’ he added. ’The old days are over when America supported Europe just because it always had.’… 

“Although many European nations have long failed to meet their NATO spending requirements, a key point of contention between Europe and President Trump, the notion of creating a European Army has been a long-held aim of key globalists on the continent, such as French President Emmanuel Macron, EU chief Ursula von der Leyen, and former Belgian Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt. Such a project may force Europeans to invest far more in their defence spending. However, concerns have also been raised about further deteriorating national sovereignty for EU member states…” 

Zelensky said verbatim: 

“Armed Forces of Europe must be created… As we fight this war and lay the groundwork for peace and security we must build the Armed Forces of Europe so that Europe’s future depends only on Europeans and decisions about Europe are made in Europe. Europe has everything it takes but it needs to come together. We need confidence in our own friends so that others have no choice but to respect Europe’s power and without a European army that is impossible.” 

That is very true. 

Putin to Attack NATO Within a Year or Six Months? 

The Sun wrote on February 14: 

“Zelesnky warned the West that Vladimir Putin is preparing to unleash a war against Nato in the next 12 months. In a press conference on Friday morning, he said Vlad was readying a conflict with Nato in 2026 and that giving away Ukrainian land would not appease him. Zelensky said: ‘Based on all the information I’ve gathered from intelligence and other sources, I think he (Russian President Vladimir Putin) is preparing for war against NATO countries next year…. 

“He also believes… Vlad is preparing to send 15 divisions – some 150,000 soldiers – to Belarus… ‘And I’m not sure this group will move towards Ukraine,’ he added. From Belarus, Putin’s murderous army could easily invade Ukraine, Poland or the three Baltic countries – sparking all out chaos on the continent. 

“Spy intel released from Denmark on Wednesday warned that Russia’s military capacity could see Putin ready to spark wars with neighbouring regions in a just six months as he eyes fractures in Nato. An unclassified assessment from the Danish Defence Intelligence Service [DDIS] says: ‘Russia perceives itself as being in conflict with the West and is preparing for a war against NATO.” 

Some accuse us, wrongfully, of hateful anti-Russia propaganda when we are reporting the news, in the light of biblical prophecy. The Bible says clearly that Russia will retaliate against Europe after Europe has attacked Russia, due to disturbing rumors stemming from Russia. The scenario reminds us of the situation during World War II, involving Hitler and Stalin.  Both were preparing for war against each other, but Hitler was faster, ending in total defeat of Germany. The same will happen again. 

Europe Can’t Assume US Help Will Last Forever 

AFP wrote on February 14:

“US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Friday warned NATO allies in Europe against assuming that the American troop presence on the continent would ‘last forever’, as he urged them to spend more on defence… 

“Trump has repeatedly called on NATO members to increase their military expenditure… Trump has previously said that [the alliance’s current minimum level of two percent] should be more than doubled to five percent of gross domestic product (GDP).” 

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and others declared that this was unacceptable and impossible to achieve. 

Steinmeier Attacks Trump 

AFP wrote on February 14: 

“German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier (SPD) on Friday said: ‘… The new American administration has a very different world view to ours… One that has no regard for established rules, partnership and established trust…’ 

“The German head of state urged European leaders to keep calm in the face of a blizzard of disruptive policy announcements from Washington since Trump returned to the White House. ‘We must not allow ourselves to be paralysed by the flood of announcements,’ he said… 

“Steinmeier added: ‘It makes a difference when the leading democracy and world power says: we can do without rules.’” 

We did not have to wait very long for a response. Note the next articles. 

Vance Blasts Europe 

The Sun wrote on February 14: 

Donald Trump’s number two blasted the continent at today’s Munich Security Conference just a day after a horror attack in the city left 36 people injured – including children [One child and her mother died in the meantime]… Suspect [Afghan] Farhad N is being investigated by terror cops after he allegedly rammed a Mini Cooper into a group of demonstrators in the Bavarian capital on Thursday… Vance… used it as just one example of a concerning number of recent incidents across Europe… [he] lectured the audience by saying their nation’s citizens ‘didn’t vote to open floodgates to millions of unvetted immigrants’

“VP Vance also took aim at Britain as he heavily criticised the government for its ‘backsliding’ free speech laws… He said: ‘In Britain, and across Europe, free speech I fear is in retreat…” 

Vance: Europe Engaged in Censorship 

Daily Mail wrote on February 14: 

“Vice President J.D. Vance took his culture war to Europe on Friday, warning that its greatest threat came not from China or Russia but from within as he delivered a blistering attack on what he said was the continent’s retreat from its traditional values. Vance said free speech and democratic institutions were being eroded in an address to the Munich Security Conference. 

“He accused European politicians of forcing people to shut down social media accounts and urged leaders to do more to stem illegal immigration… ‘If you’re running in fear of your own voters, there is nothing America can do for you, nor, for that matter, is there anything that you can do for the American people who elected me and elected President Trump.’ 

“He accused European Union officials of ‘canceling elections (for instance in Romania) and asked whether ‘we’re holding ourselves to an appropriately higher standard’.” 

Who can honestly deny that Europe is engaged in terrible censorship? 

Vance: “There Should Be No Firewalls” 

JTA wrote on February 14: 

“In a speech in Munich, Vice President J.D. Vance scolded European leaders for boycotting populist parties, and said German politicians should abandon their policy of maintaining a ‘firewall’ (“Brandmauer”) against the far-right. 

“Vance’s speech… was greeted with murmurs from the audience and backlash from German officials. It comes as the country’s far-right party, Alternative for Germany, is polling second ahead of national elections next week. The country’s center-right and center-left parties have long refused to work with the party, known as AfD. ‘What German democracy — what no democracy — American, German or European — will survive is telling millions of voters that their thoughts and concerns, their aspirations, their pleas for relief, are invalid or unworthy of even being considered,’ Vance said. ‘Democracy rests on the sacred principle that the voice of the people matters. There’s no room for firewalls.’… 

“‘The organizers of this very conference have banned lawmakers representing populist parties on both the left and the right from participating in these conversations,’ Vance said. ‘Now, again, we don’t have to agree with everything or anything that people say. But when people represent, when political leaders represent, an important constituency, it is incumbent upon us to at least participate in dialogue with them.’ 

“Vance also championed AfD’s central issue, opposing migration to Europe… ‘Of all the pressings challenges that the nations represented here face, I believe there is nothing more urgent than mass migration,’ Vance said on Saturday. ‘No voter on this continent went to the ballot box to open the floodgates to millions of unvetted immigrants… More and more, all over Europe, they’re voting for political leaders who promised to put an end to out-of-control migration.’ 

“He also defended comments made by Elon Musk, the multibillionaire and top Trump adviser who has endorsed AfD and spoke at one of its rallies. ‘Speaking up and expressing opinions isn’t election interference, even when people express views outside your own country and even when those people are very influential,’ Vance said. ‘If American democracy can survive 10 years of Greta Thunberg’s scolding, you guys can survive a few months of Elon Musk.’ 

“Vance’s words were met with criticism from German leaders. ‘I don’t think it is right for foreigners, including those from friendly foreign countries, to interfere so intensively in an election campaign in the middle of an election period,’ a government spokesperson said. The German defense minister (Boris Pistorius) called Vance’s criticism of European democracy ‘unacceptable.’” 

Pistorius went even much further than that. According to Deutsche Welle, dated February 14, he said

“‘Democracy was called into question by the US vice president for the whole of Europe earlier… He speaks of the annihilation of democracy. And if I have understood him correctly, he is comparing conditions in parts of Europe with those in authoritarian regions… that is not acceptable… [Democracy means that] extremist parties such as the AfD can campaign quite normally, just like any other party… However, democracy does not mean that the loud minority is automatically right and determines the truth.” 

It is obvious that Germany and the USA do not see eye-to-eye on this. And Pistorius paints a distorted picture, as there are movements, including in his own party, the SPD,  to ban the AfD. That the reports of the mass media on the AfD are, to a large extent, untrue, misleading and exaggerated, cannot be denied.  

Vance Chastises Hypocritical Europe 

Breitbart wrote on February 14: 

“Europe is obsessed with external threats but is so morally lost it isn’t even clear what it’s defending itself for any more, JD Vance warned in an excoriating speech to the continent’s security elite on Friday. Traditionally, applause is a well-worn gauge of how well a message is going down in a conference-hall. In most cases an audience can bring itself to at least raise half-hearted, polite applause but in Munich on Friday Vance couldn’t even get that: in a room of hundreds, perhaps a thousand top military, security, and political figures at times it seemed like there can’t have been anyone more than Vance’s own team putting their hands together. 

“The response was particularly frosty mid-speech as Vance listed some particularly egregious recent cases in European states where the government has cracked down on liberties, from arresting Christians for silent prayer to cancelling elections, and when he outright accused the leaders of the continent of Soviet, anti-democratic attitudes. Worst of all, he said, they held these feelings towards their own people. 

“If Europe’s paternalist elites hated this shock therapy, populists in Europe loved itBritain’s Nigel Farage amplified the notion Vance had better articulated the future of Europe than those elites could, while Reform MP Rupert Lowe called it a ‘brutal’ tour-de-force of ‘Truth, after truth, after truth.’ 

“Beyond a laundry list of failings by European governments to respect freedom for their own people, Vance diagnosed a continent lost for its own failure to understand what it stands for and why, and even worse one that scorns the views of its own people… 

“Of the terror attack that took place in Germany just the day before, Vance nodded at the long and shameful history of such assaults in Europe, stating: ‘How many times must we suffer these appalling setbacks before we change course and take our shared civilisation in a new direction?’… 

“Vance said: ‘I’d ask my European friends to have some perspective. You can believe it’s wrong for Russia to buy social media advertisements to influence your elections. We certainly do. You can condemn it on the world stage even. But if your democracy can be destroyed with a few hundreds-of-thousands [of dollars] of digital advertising from a foreign country, then it wasn’t very strong to begin with.’… 

“Britain’s left-wing Guardian called the speech a ‘blistering’ and ‘chastising’ attack and emphasised that it would go down well in Moscow, playing up the old idea that Donald Trump is some sort of crypto-Russian asset. Germany’s Die Welt notes the comments of politician Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann (FDP), replying: ‘Our liberal world is under extreme threat’.” 

Vance was right on far too many points. No wonder that the hypocritical European elite responded with anger and frustration. But making Trump angry is not a good recipe. Note the next article.  

JD Vance’s Glorious Speech 

The New York Post published the following “opinion” on February 14: 

“It was a delicious spectacle — a self-made millennial Yank torching the grey-faced technocrats of my sad, knackered continent. He didn’t hold back. He eviscerated the assembled dignitaries for their failings on free speech, democracy and security. He lamented ‘the retreat of Europe from some of its most fundamental values’ — words that will have resonated with millions of Europeans. I’m one of them. 

“It was on the freedom to speak that he made his most stinging comments. ‘Across Europe, free speech, I fear, is in retreat,’ he told his startled audience. He rattled off recent acts of outrageous censorship that would have made Stalin beam with pride. He mentioned police raids in Germany on citizens ‘suspected of posting anti-feminist comments online.’ Criticizing feminism is a blasphemy in woke Germany. 

“He reminded us that just two weeks ago, a Christian activist in Sweden was convicted for burning copies of the Koran — despite the fact that his friend had just been murdered for doing the same… He rebuked my homeland, Britain, for its tragic ‘backslide away from conscience rights.’ The ‘basic liberties of religious Britons’ are being throttled, he said. He gave the example of Christians being arrested for ‘silently praying’ near abortion clinics. This really is happening. This once great nation that gave the world such game-changing freedom warriors as John Milton and John Stuart Mill now erects ‘buffer zones’ around abortion clinics in which you can be nabbed by cops for praying in your own head… 

“There’s now  Soviet style censorship in Europe, he said. He chastised the EU’s ‘commissars’ — I literally whooped when he used that word — for censoring everything they don’t like. The Euro bureaucracy hides ‘behind ugly Soviet-era words like misinformation and disinformation’ to silence those who simply have an ‘alternative viewpoint,’ he said. Never a truer word. On every issue, from COVID to the gender ideology to mass immigration, what our overlords refer to as ‘misinformation’ is usually just thinking that differs from their own… ‘Dismissing people . . . shutting people out of the political process’ — this is the ‘most surefire way to destroy democracy.’… 

“Vance’s speech wasn’t so much a breath of fresh air as a hurricane of good sense. It was a storm of reason that has left many in Europe wide-eyed and wanting more. The liberal press is accusing him of ‘attacking Europe.’ He didn’t attack us. He talked to us…” 

NBC News wrote on February 15: 

“Asked about a speech Friday by Vice President JD Vance in Europe that drew alarm after he touched on migration and freedom of speech, Trump praised it as a ‘very good speech, actually very brilliant.’” 

Actually, it was. 

German Politicians Gang Up on Vance (and Trump) 

Deutsche Welle wrote on February 15: 

“After a provocative speech by US Vice President JD Vance at the Munich Security Conference, CDU/CSU chancellor candidate Friedrich Merz aired his concerns about the direction of US foreign policy and said Washington is ‘openly interfering in an election’ as the Germans prepare to go to the polls in less than 10 days… Merz said: ‘The American security guarantees are being called into question, the Americans are questioning democratic institutions, and they are interfering quite openly in an election, including in relation to democratic parties and their majorities.’.. ‘I have to say, it disturbs me… It doesn’t surprise me because they have talked about this before, but I firmly reject it. It is not the job of the American government to explain to us here in Germany how we should protect democratic institutions. And we will continue on our course.’… 

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has expressed his frustration after US Vice President JD Vance criticized European governments… ‘What was said is irritating and cannot simply be dismissed and played down,’ Scholz [said]… 

German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius doubled down on his criticism of US Vice President JD Vance’s speech… ‘I’m convinced, deeply convinced, as a democrat in Germany and Europe, that our democracies are even more stable and as good as ever before,’ Pistorius said.” 

That is laughable and ridiculous.

The New York Times wrote on February 15 about hypocritical reactions of German politicians: 

“Scholz… said Germany ‘would not accept’ directives from outsiders about how to run its democracy — and certainly not to work with such a party [AfD)… Mr. Merz said: ‘Free speech remains free speech and remains part of our open, democratic society. And fake news, hate speech and offenses remain subject to legal restraints and controlled by independent courts.’” 

Not so. The government (especially the SPD and the Green) and the opposition of the “established” parties (especially the CDU) are heavily involved in suppressing what they are claiming to be “hate speech” and “fake news.” Vance showed it as it is. They did not want to hear it. They did not want anyone to say it, as it was so blatantly true. Now they are concerned about votes. They are in harmony in their effort to attack Vance. This hypocritical approach might backfire. 

Germany’s Orwellian Approach to Lunacy 

Daily Mail wrote on February 17: 

“Vice President JD Vance continued his defense of free speech on Monday, criticizing German prosecutors explaining their efforts to crack down on free speech in Germany… German prosecutors explained to the reporter how surprised German citizens are when they are arrested for posting offensive content online, but said it was necessary. But Vance disagreed.

‘Insulting someone is not a crime and criminalizing speech is going to put real strain on European-US relationships,’ the vice president said. 

“The German prosecutors explained that anyone sharing or resharing offensive or hateful content would be prosecuted and fined, seizing their phones, and even jailed…. ‘This is Orwellian, and everyone in Europe and the US must reject this lunacy,’ [Vance] replied…. 

“Vance also reacted to a video clip of CBS’s Face the Nation host Margaret Brennan after she suggested in an interview with Secretary of State Marco Rubio that lax free speech laws in Germany gave rise to the Holocaust… ‘This is a crazy exchange,’ Vance noted on X. ‘Does the media really think the Holocaust was caused by free speech?’” 

Breitbart added on February 17: 

“American broadcaster CBS followed German police as they raided homes for speech crimes, such as posting a ‘racist cartoon’ on the internet… Unlike the United States, where the First Amendment protects citizens from being arrested over so-called ‘hate speech’, it is a very different story in Germany…” 

This “lunacy” is crazy and dangerous indeed. The ignorance of Brennan is mind-boggling. If anything, censorship and prohibition of free speech contributed to the Holocaust. And once again, Germany is moving more and more towards an Orwellian dictatorship.  

The Ukraine Challenge 

Daily Mail wrote on February 16: 

“US Special Presidential Envoy for Ukraine and Russia, Keith Kellogg, 80, has encouraged Europe to join the conversation about the Ukraine-Russia conflict – yet made clear they would not have a final say in any resolution. He has now told the Munich Security Conference: ‘That is not going to happen…’ 

“French foreign minister Jean-Noel Barrot today told the France Inter radio station on Sunday that a meeting in Paris would now go ahead tomorrow, with five European diplomats saying it would include France, Britain, Germany, Poland, Italy, Spain and Denmark – the latter representing Scandinavian nations. (The meeting is designed to figure out a unified strategy against Trump and “how to answer” him)… 

“Retired general Mr Kellogg said the negotiations would be between Russia and Ukraine, with Mr Trump acting as mediator – but Europe would still be able to have an input… Appearing alongside Mr Kellogg at a townhall event in Munich, Britain’s Foreign Secretary David Lammy warned that Mr Putin’s KGB history meant he could not be trusted in a negotiation. 

“Mr Lammy said: ‘There is a Tsarist tradition that he’s leaning into – Peter the Great, Nicholas I – the worst of that period, imperial in its ambitions. And there is a Soviet tradition. Let’s remember, he’s a KGB agent. He’s a man of deception, and in negotiating with him, we have to understand that and relate to that.’” 

Summit Failed 

Breitbart added on February 17: 

“The leaders of eight European nations, alongside two top EU representatives, descended on Paris on Monday for a summit on Ukraine… However, it soon became clear… that a broader consensus remains out of reach… Following the meeting, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said that it was ‘highly inappropriate’ to discuss sending troops to Ukraine…. Hungary criticised the summit in Paris, which, despite sharing a border with Ukraine, was not invited to take part in the talks… 

“Indeed, despite UK Prime Minister Starmer’s stated willingness to deploy British troops in ‘harm’s way’ in Ukraine…, the former head of the British Army, Lord Richard Dannatt, said that Starmer is living in ‘fantasy-land’ if he believes the UK can sustain such a deployment.” 

All of this will change, as the ancient Roman Empire is being revived right now in Europe, and ten European core nations or groups of nations will give their power and authority to a charismatic military leader in Europe—the beast. It is absolutely astonishing that some ”Christians,” claiming to have an understanding of the Bible, do not remotely grasp those clear and compelling prophecies. 

American Soldiers Upset With Trump 

The Telegraph wrote on February 17: 

“US military volunteers fighting alongside Ukraine’s armed forces have branded President Donald Trump a ‘jackass’ over his peace talks with Vladimir Putin, saying Ukraine’s future was not a ‘business deal’… Most have reacted furiously to the news last week of Mr Trump’s private phone call to Putin, in which he apparently ruled out Nato membership for Kyiv and conceded that Moscow could keep Ukrainian territory it has currently occupied… Ex-US soldiers are believed to make up the largest national contingent of Western military volunteers in Ukraine… They regard Mr Trump’s concessions as squandering both their own military sacrifices and those of their Ukrainian comrades… The anger voiced by US volunteers reflects the wider split that the Ukraine war has caused within America’s military community, which traditionally leans Republican… 

“While neither the Biden nor the Trump administration has sanctioned US citizens going to fight in Ukraine, volunteers who have done so have often been vocal advocates for US support for Kyiv, appearing on TV shows and addressing US politicians in Washington DC… Among the keenest US advocates for Kyiv’s cause is Alex Drueke, an Iraq veteran from Alabama, who was captured by Russian forces during his first mission as a volunteer in Ukraine in June 2022. He spent nearly four months in captivity, during which time he was beaten repeatedly, subjected to torture by electric shock, and told he would be executed as a mercenary. 

“Since his release as part of a prisoner swap deal, he has given speeches to schools, community groups and policy forums, trying to convince Americans not to withdraw support for Kyiv….’The world needs to be reminded that 50 per cent of us did not vote for this horrible man [Trump], who is not only destroying his country from within, but the world outside too,” he said.” 

Wide-Ranging Concessions to Putin? 

Express wrote on February 17: 

“A Kremlin insider has claimed that Donald Trump has offered ‘unprecedented’ concessions to Russia, and will allow Vladimir Putin to strike Brussels, Paris or even London… On the Russian TV show ‘The Evening With Vladimir Solovyov,’ Mosfilm’s Director General Karen Shakhnazarov commented on the discussions between the global leaders, viewing them as unequivocally favorable. Shakhnazarov remarked, ‘The president of the United States called the president of Russia. That alone is already a major success!’ 

“He further elaborated, ‘The blockade has been broken. It means a lot to all of them that the president of the United States, the mightiest nation in the West, as great as the Roman Empire, made this call. It’s as if Julius Caesar himself telephoned a barbarian, a chieftain of some German tribe.’… 

“Political scientist Sergey Mikheyev weighed in on the situation: ‘In this situation, we should make it clear for the Europeans: now we can really strike Brussels, London or Paris, because we can forget about Article 5. You can forget the notion that Americans would step in on your behalf.’ 

“Meanwhile, Russians are pushing their military to quickly seize more Ukrainian territory, with Kremlin analysts predicting that following Putin’s talks with Trump, Russia could potentially face no repercussions for any land it annexes.” 

Peace Talks Between USA and Russia in Saudi Arabia 

The Sun reported on February 18: 

Earlier today, a team of top diplomats from Russia and the US spoke about negotiating an end to the war in Ukraine out in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia… Present at the negotiating table was US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Trump’s Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff and National Security Advisor Mike Waltz… They were joined by… Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and foreign policy advisor Yuri Ushako… 

“One of the key stumbling blocks which could dampen the negotiations would be from Ukraine’s side. They were notably excluded from Riyadh today in a move which left both President Zelensky and his European allies annoyed and frustrated… Zelensky even announced he has postponed his official visit to… Saudi Arabia until March 10 – despite him initially being scheduled to arrive tomorrow. The move has been done in order to not give any ‘legitimacy’ to the US-Russia meeting… 

“Without promises that Zelensky will never be able to enter [NATO]… Putin is unlikely to accept any terms… 

“Britain and Europe must play their part – but have no hope on their own… European leaders have tried to muscle their way into the talks to try and make sure stability in the continent can continue even if Putin gets his way in the negotiations… British Prime Minister Keir Starmer made a rallying cry to Europe urging them to ‘deploy peacekeeping troops to Ukraine… But the idea was dramatically rejected by a number of other fellow leaders. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz described Starmer’s pleas as ‘premature’ and ‘highly inappropriate’.  He then stormed out of the meeting adding that the shear thought of making decisions seemingly on behalf of Ukraine was ‘irritating.’ Poland, Spain and Italy all joined Germany in scrutinising Starmer’s plan.” 

Trump Blames Zelensky 

Politico wrote on February 19: 

“President Donald Trump mocked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as a poor negotiator and ‘grossly incompetent’ Tuesday, as tensions continued to rise over the administration’s direct talks with Russia about ending the war it launched nearly three years ago. The comments come amid criticism from European allies and many American intelligence experts that Ukraine and European nations invested in Ukraine’s defense had been excluded from negotiations that began early Tuesday between U.S. and Russian officials in Saudi Arabia… 

“‘Today I heard, ”Oh, well, we weren’t invited,”’ Trump said when asked about criticism from Ukraine, seeming to direct his response to Zelenskyy. ‘Well, you’ve been there for three years. You should have ended it — three years. You should have never been there. You should have never started it. You should have made a deal.’ 

“The comment — ignoring that it was Russia that invaded Ukraine without provocation three years ago this month — was Trump’s harshest condemnation to date of the Ukrainian side. It came as Zelenskyy and leaders across Europe are scrambling to respond to growing indications that Kyiv’s most critical ally for the last three years appears to be more interested in normalizing relations with Russia than in making sure Ukraine endures and that Russian President Vladimir Putin faces stronger deterrence after starting the first land war on European soil since 1945. 

“Trump also confirmed his interest in forcing elections in Ukraine as part of any diplomatic resolution to the war. ‘We have a situation where we haven’t had elections in Ukraine, where we have martial law in Ukraine, where the leader in Ukraine — I mean I hate to say it, but he’s down at 4% approval rating — and the country’s been blown to smithereens,’ Trump said. While Zelenskyy’s public approval rating has dropped from the early days of the war, he still has support from a narrow majority of Ukrainians — 52 percent according to a poll last month… The president also asserted that Ukrainians, who are fighting for their country’s survival, ‘are tired’ of the death and destruction and eager to see the war end… 

“That statement was at odds with the reality across Ukraine, where elected officials and much of the population have been shocked at the Trump administration’s actions that appear indifferent to the nation’s fate. Those include not only the talks with Moscow but also a U.S. proposal to claim half of Ukraine’s rare earth mineral rights as payment for aid already received, without future security guarantees.” 

Express wrote on February 19: 

The Ukrainian president has hit back… President Volodymyr Zelensky responded by accusing Trump of living in a ‘disinformation space’… 

“Zelensky’s response to Donald Trump shows a rift between the two leaders deepening and the two country’s allyship dwindling. This marks a seismic shift in tone to the US’s involvement in the war…”

Another Deadly Terrorist Attack in Austria 

Breitbart reported on February 16: 

“A Syrian allegedly stabbed six people in the Austrian town of Villach in a suspected Islamist terror attack on Saturday afternoon that left a 14-year-old boy dead. Just days after terror struck in Munich, a 23-year-old supposed refugee from Syria launched into a vicious stabbing spree in the Carinthian town of Villach on Saturday afternoon. Five people were injured during the attack, and tragically, a 14-year-old was killed after bleeding out on the street. 

“The suspect, identified by Kronen Zeitung as ‘Ahmad G.’, is reported by eyewitnesses to have laughed during the attack. He is also said to have shouted out ‘Allahu Akbar’ and made hand gestures associated with the ISIS terrorist group. The suspected terrorist may have committed more violence; however, he was driven down by a fellow Syrian delivery driver before being apprehended by police… 

“Ahmad G. arrived in Austria in 2020 and was only recently recognised by the government as a refugee. It is believed that the 23-year-old was radicalised by Islamist preachers on the TikTok social media platform. A search of his apartment found that he owned an ISIS flag…

“The leader of the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ), Herbert Kickl, took aim at the country’s asylum system following the attack, saying that he was ‘angry at those politicians who have allowed stabbings, rapes, gang wars and other major crimes to become the order of the day in Austria… This is a system failure… for which a young person in Villach now had to pay with his life.’… 

Despite winning the most votes of any party in last year’s elections, Kickl’s Freedom Party has so far been unable to form a government in Vienna. Other establishment parties, notably the supposedly conservative Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP), have enacted a cordon sanitaire around the party, similar to the one imposed on the anti-mass migration AfD in neighbouring Germany. Yet, this has resulted in the FPÖ continuing to gain support in polls.”

The same as in Germany. These “Brandmauern” (“firewalls”) are just stupid and counterproductive.

Cyrus and Trump

Israel 365 News wrote on February 14:

“The  Nascent Sanhedrin published an open letter to President Donald Trump. [It stated, among other things:]

“In 2017, the Nascent Sanhedrin minted a special coin featuring your image on one side and Cyrus the Great on the other. This symbolized your historic role, likened to that of Cyrus, who was chosen by Hashem to fulfill a divine mission.  The Chinese appreciated this idea so much that they reproduced and sold millions of copies of these coins and other products featuring your image alongside Cyrus the Great. You have been elected, as Cyrus was in his time, to fulfill a heavenly mission…”

The article commented: “Many have seen similarities between the Biblical King Cyrus and President Donald Trump.”

Cyrus features predominately in the Bible because of enabling the Jews to build the Second Temple. The Bible prophesies that a Third Temple will be built in Jerusalem, prior to Christ’s return. Sadly, there are still some, claiming to be “Christians”, who do not understand and accept these clearly revealed prophecies.

USAID Financed Hamas?

Israel Today wrote on February 12:

“Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Monday accused the United States Agency for International Development of providing ‘vast and secret’ funding for Hamas following new revelations about USAID’s practices vis-à-vis Israel and the Palestinians….

“‘The full story of funding Hamas is vast, and much of it was done in secret,’ Cruz wrote. ‘Before and after October 7, [2023], USAID flowed uncountable hundreds of millions of dollars toward Hamas that enabled it to launch the attack and keep battling Israel afterwards. They lied about the nature of that aid in public databases, refused to disclose what groups were getting the money, and gave tens of millions in American cash to be distributed without American supervision.’

“Internally, Cruz added, USAID ‘admitted the aid would benefit Hamas, and even exempted themselves from anti-terrorism laws, but in public issued denials.’”

If true, they should be severely punished and sent to jail.

RFK: Spiritual and Physical Health Are Connected

Desert News wrote on February 14:

“In his first interview after being confirmed, new HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. spoke about the impact faith can have on health. ‘For 20 years, I’ve gotten up every morning on my knees and prayed that God would put me in a position where I can end the childhood chronic disease epidemic in this country,’ Robert Kennedy Jr. said in remarks Thursday at the White House — having just been confirmed as secretary of health in the White House. Kennedy went on to describe his surprising partnership with then-candidate Donald Trump as an answer to his prayers…

“‘We can’t be a strong nation if we have a weak citizenry, if people are sick,’ he said, citing other statistics that ‘77% of our children cannot qualify for military service.’ ‘We’re not just in a health crisis, but we’re in a spiritual crisis. And those things are connected,’ Kennedy said on Fox’s Laura Ingraham’s show later on Thursday… ‘We have a whole generation of kids that feel alienated, dispossessed. They are in [an] existential crisis,’ and not only because of their health… ‘There’s a purposelessness in their lives and no sense of usefulness or effectiveness…’

“Kennedy argued that this deeper spiritual alienation is what ‘drives also the chronic disease epidemic, and the epidemics we’re seeing of depression, of suicide, of alcoholism, of drug addiction… The only way to overcome that biological impulse is with a spiritual realignment, a spiritual fire.’…

“For addicts who have become isolated and withdrawn from other relationships, he said… ‘We need to get up in the morning and not think about, “What am I going to do to make myself happy today?” We have to get up and say, “What am I going to do to make myself useful today, to be useful to my friends, to my family, to my community.’” The connectedness that comes from doing good things, from being of service to others, is ultimately the path to happiness, he said…

Kennedy… noted that although having ‘4.2% of the world’s population,’ the United States buys ‘70% of the pharmaceutical drugs on earth… We spend two to three times what other countries pay for health care, and we have worse health outcomes. We literally have the sickest population in the world… I’m not going to let the food industry and the pharmaceutical industry run health policy anymore.’

Kennedy was also asked at the press conference how he would address concerns that some Americans may have about his stance on vaccines… he said… that a ‘common sense’ approach is that ‘vaccines should be tested, they should be safe…’”

Interesting words. It remains to be seen how RFK will deliver…especially when it comes to unconscionable MANDATORY vaccinations, including for babies and school children. The connection between drugs and vaccinations and serious sicknesses should be obvious.

No More Mandatory Covid Vaccinations

Fox News wrote on February 14:

“President Donald Trump signed an executive order Friday barring schools who still have coronavirus vaccine mandates from receiving federal funds…. It also tasks Department of HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy and the Secretary of Education to establish guidelines for compliance and to ‘provide a plan to end coercive COVID-19 vaccine mandates.’…”

“Trump also signed an executive order in January that removes federal funding from K-12 schools that teach critical race theory.”

NBC News added on February 15:

“Trump’s administration has already taken steps to end coronavirus vaccine requirements at the federal level, including for green card applicants, and reinstated service members who were discharged for refusing the vaccine… Currently, Covid vaccines are no longer required in K-12 schools across the country, according to two nonprofit health policy research organizations… 15 colleges in the U.S. still require Covid shots…

“On the campaign trail, Trump pledged to strip funding for schools that require vaccines and masks for students and said he would not allow schools to impose Covid mandates. Trump’s proposal sparked concerns at the time about funding for schools in states that require most students to be immunized from diseases like measles and polio. A Trump spokesperson clarified that he was referring to Covid vaccines.”

This is a major problem. There should be NO mandatory vaccination at all for any diseases. Will Trump have the guts to go that far? Will RFK have the guts to recommend this? Also, what will happen if there is another COVID or “related” “pandemic”, which is surely to come?  Will the current executive orders also apply to such future “threatening” scenarios? Now is the time for Trump and RFK and others to pick up the fight against pharma.

Britain’s Foreign Aid Lunacy

The Sun wrote on February 17:

“BRITISH taxes are being squandered on shrimp farms in Bangladesh, poetry workshops in Colombian jails and gender lectures in Kenya. UK workers also fund diversity training in the Jordanian army and cyber security for India — while pressure mounts to raise our military budget…

“Among the worst cases, the past three years have seen the UK hand more than £133,000 to Bangladesh Agricultural University to study shrimp health… Taxpayers are also funding woke ideology around the war-torn Third World…. The department also funded a £110,000 conference on ‘preventing gender-based disinformation’ in Kenya,.. Brits are also paying through the nose for climate initiatives in foreign countries, including £114million for ‘inclusive green enterprises’ in India…”

Where Is Heaven?

Daily Mail wrote on February 16:

 “…For Christians, the idea of the dead being in heaven or enjoying paradise often brings comfort to the bereaved and hope to those suffering or dying.  But in the Christian faith, heaven was originally more about where God lived, not about humanity’s ultimate destination if they live a righteous life.  N.T. Wright, professor of New Testament and Early Christianity at the University of St Andrews, said the way people now talk about heaven is ‘deeply unbiblical and misleading’.

“’Basically the whole western tradition took a wrong turn in imagining that the aim of the game was ‘to go to heaven when we die’,’ he told MailOnline.   

‘The whole Bible is about the God of heaven coming to make his home with us…’ 

“Lari Launonen, philosopher at University of Helsinki in Finland, said… ‘The Bible actually describes a renewed, physical world…’

“Famously, at the start of the Bible in the Book of Genesis, we are told that heaven is created by God along with the Earth (Actually, it says, “heavens”). This contradicts the theory of Big Bang generally accepted by scientists, where the universe exploded into existence from a single minute point…” 

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News

Trump’s Contemplated Deal With Ukraine

The New York Post wrote on February 7:

“The US won’t repeat the mistakes of the Iraq War by failing to secure valuable resources from Ukraine in exchange for help ending Russia’s nearly three-year-old invasion, President Trump’s special envoy to the conflict exclusively told The Post. ‘When you look at the mineral deposits in that country, we’re not talking millions of dollars. We’re talking — virtually every region, we’re talking about billions, and then some regions are [worth] trillions,’ retired Gen. Keith Kellogg said this week…

“Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Friday signaled support for a reciprocal resource deal with the US in exchange for security guarantees as part of a potential peace settlement…

“Ukraine is home to roughly 5% of the world’s mineral resources, with rich deposits of titanium, uranium, iron, manganese and lithium — as well as rare earth minerals that are considered vital to US national security… Ukraine holds about 7% of the world’s supply of titanium — the largest reserves of any European country — which is needed for the production of everything from aerospace and defense materials to medicine and jewelry. It is also used in other industries such as energy and construction…

“Ukraine also has one of the continent’s largest confirmed reserves of lithium — a vital component in batteries and used in everyday products from ceramics to medicine — at roughly 500,000 metric tons… Ukraine is also known as the ‘breadbasket of Europe’ due to its strong grain exports… They have the most fertile soil in the entire world…”

Daily Mail wrote on February 7:

“US president Donald Trump will try to force Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky to agree to a ceasefire with Russia by Easter under a peace plan, according to a report. 

“Trump, who has long claimed that he would be able to negotiate an ending to the brutal invasion of Ukraine in a single day, is said to be working to end the war within 100 days.  The unconfirmed plans, reported by Ukrainian outlet Strana, have been doing the rounds in ‘political and diplomatic circles’ in Ukraine, and will include a ceasefire by April 20 that would freeze Russia’s steady advance, and a ban on Ukraine from joining NATO.

“According to Newsweek it would include a demand for Kyiv to accept Russian sovereignty on annexed land…  On top of this, Ukrainian troops will be made to leave Russia’s Kursk region, where it launched a counteroffensive in August, while a contingent of European soldiers, which could include British troops, would be asked to police a demilitarised zone. American troops will not be involved in this contingent.  The EU will reportedly be asked to assist Ukraine in its reconstruction efforts, which may cost as much as $486billion (£392billion) over the next decade…”

Scholz Rebukes Trump

Deutsche Welle wrote on February 7:

“German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has derided Trump’s foreign policies in regard to aid for Ukraine and trade. ‘Ukraine is under attack, and Germany is helping without expectations of getting paid for it later. That should be everyone’s attitude,’ Scholz told the German media group Redaktionsnetzwerk Deutschland… Scholz has labeled this move by Trump as “selfish” and “self-centered.”

“The German chancellor also rebuked Trump’s tariff policies… Scholz… suggested that if Trump enacts tariffs on EU goods, ‘the European Commission is able to react within hours.’” 

Scholz is a lame-duck chancellor with no prospects of reelection by the end of February. Still, unless a new government is formed, Scholz will continue in a caretaker function. And even a lame duck can make lots of noise.

Many Ukrainians Want to Be Russian?

AFP wrote on February 11:

“The Kremlin said Tuesday a ‘significant part’ of Ukraine ‘wants to be Russia,’ hours after President Donald Trump floated the idea that Ukraine ‘may be Russian someday.’

Addressing the three-year conflict between Moscow and Kyiv in a Fox News interview that aired Monday, Trump said: ‘[Ukraine] may make a deal, they may not make a deal. They may be Russian someday, or they may not be Russian someday.’

“Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Tuesday… ‘The fact that a significant part of Ukraine wants to become Russia, and has already, is a fact’… referring to Moscow’s 2022 annexation of four Ukrainian regions.’”

Newsmax added on February 12:

“Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy told the Guardian newspaper he planned to offer Russia a straight territory exchange to help bring an end to the war, including offering pockets of Kursk that Ukraine holds… ‘We will swap one territory for another,’ Zelenskyy said, adding he did not know which part of Russian-occupied territory Ukraine would ask for back…

“Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Moscow categorically rejects all offers to trade territory. ‘This is impossible,’ he told reporters at a daily briefing. ‘Russia has never discussed and will not discuss the exchange of its territory’…

“President Donald Trump said he spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin Wednesday about starting negotiations ‘immediately’ to end the war in Ukraine… It was unclear how closely Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy would be involved… Trump held a phone call with him Wednesday… Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Trump’s special Russia-Ukraine envoy, retired Gen. Keith Kellogg, will all be in Germany later this week for the annual Munich Security Conference, which Zelenskyy will also attend.

“However, in a blow to Ukraine’s aspirations, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said earlier Wednesday at NATO headquarters in Brussels that NATO membership was not realistic for Ukraine and said that any security guarantees for the country would have to be born by European countries.”

US to Take Gaza? Confusion Amounts!

Daily Mail wrote on February 10:

“President Donald Trump doubled down on his pitch for the U.S. to takeover Gaza and said Palestinians would not have the right to move back. The 78-year-old president was asked about his stunning call for the U.S. to control Gaza during his flight to the Super Bowl on Sunday. Questions had mounted after his administration scrambled to clarify his suggestion last week. ‘I’m committed to buying and owning Gaza,’ Trump said on Air Force One. 

“But the president suggested as far as rebuilding, the U.S. could give sections to ‘other states in the Middle East’ to develop. In a separate interview with Fox News taped before the Super Bowl, Trump suggested the communities would be build ‘a little bit away from where they are where all of this danger is.’… But when Bret Baier asked if Palestinians would have the right to return, Trump told him ‘no they wouldn’t because they’re going to have much better housing.’

He claimed he was talking about ‘building a permanent place for them’ but if they returned now, the area is not habitable.

“Speaking on Air Force One on Sunday, Trump once again called the strip a demolition site and declared what does remain will be demolished. ‘We’re committed to owning it, taking it, and making sure that Hamas doesn’t move back,’ he said. ‘We’ll make it into a very good site for future development by somebody,’ the president added. Trump argued it would be beautiful and people could come live there from all over the world. But he also vowed to take care of the Palestinians and make sure they ‘live beautifully and in harmony and in peace and that they’re not murdered.’

“His latest remarks come after Trump declared during a press conference last week, alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, that the U.S. would take over Gaza.  Critics seized on the comments and accused Trump of calling for an ‘ethnic cleansing’ as leaders in the Middle East warned Palestinians would not be moved from their land.  Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill also rejected the U.S. takeover of Gaza and raised concerns over using U.S. tax dollars or putting Americans on the ground. The White House scrambled to clarify less than 24 hours later suggesting Trump did not mean putting U.S. boots on the ground even though the president himself did not rule it out. 

“But Trump’s in-flight press conference raised further questions about how world leaders should address the region moving forward. ‘Think of it as a big real estate site, and the United States is going to own it, and we’ll slowly, very slowly, we’re in no rush, development it,’ Trump said. ‘We’re going to bring stability to the Middle East, a totally war-torn part of the Middle East,’ the president said. Trump said it would be a ‘big mistake’ to let Palestinians return to the area as thousands have begun to travel back to the rubble left behind since a ceasefire deal was reached with Israel last month.  ‘We don’t want Hamas going back,’ Trump warned. 

“Trump previously suggested both Egypt and Jordan would take the Palestinians in, but both countries rejected his resettlement proposal…”

Even CNN suggested that Trump is right with his description of the terrible Gaza scenario, but that he is wrong with his approach as to how to fix it—admitting that there are really no plans as to how to fix it.

US and Jordan Walk Tightrope Over Gaza

Deutsche Welle wrote on February 12:

“The much-anticipated meeting between Jordan’s King Abdullah II and US President Donald Trump in the White House on Tuesday could have led to a falling-out between the two close allies. Instead, it turned out to be a bilateral tightrope walk. ‘One of the things that we can do right away is take 2,000 children, cancer children who are in a very ill state. That is possible,’ Abdullah II told Trump in Washington. ‘That is a really beautiful gesture,’ Trump answered.

“Much to the relief of Jordan, which is heavily dependent on US aid, Trump also retreated from previous threats to halt or cut aid to Jordan, even though the Jordanian king remained steadfast in his refusal to take in Palestinians from Gaza

“According to the UN, Jordan already hosts more than 2 million Palestinian refugees. Observers furthermore assume that around half of the 11 million population in Jordan has Palestinian roots. Taking in Palestinians is also widely considered as the end of a two-state-solution with an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel…

“The Jordanian king also urged Trump to show more patience in light of the upcoming emergency Arab summit in Cairo on February 27. ‘Let’s wait until the Egyptians can come and present it to the president and not get ahead of ourselves,’ Abdullah told Trump. Cairo’s Foreign Ministry meanwhile stated ‘its intention to present a vision for Gaza reconstruction that ensures the Palestinian people remain in their homeland.’”

However, Trump reiterated that Gaza must become America’s property, clarifying that the USA will not buy it, but take it.

Hamas’ Holocaust

The Jerusalem Post wrote on February 8:

“Hundreds of social media posts are drawing comparisons between the freed hostages and Holocaust survivors who endured extreme starvation…

“The release of Israeli hostages Or Levy, Ohad Ben Ami, and Eli Sharabi on Saturday morning has ignited a storm of reactions online. Many users are making chilling comparisons between the hostages’ frail condition and the Muselmann, a term used during the Holocaust to describe Jewish prisoners in Nazi concentration camps who were starved to the brink of death.

“The three hostages appeared exhausted and dangerously underweight, with protruding bones, sunken faces, and sharply defined clavicles and Adam’s apples—clear signs of severe malnutrition and muscle wasting… The haunting resemblance between the Muselmann of the Holocaust and the hostages released today is undeniable… Many are questioning how the world can witness such horrors again…”

Rather than taking a clear stance on the Hamas mass murderers, the world is ganging up on Israel.

Trump Hits ICC With Sanctions

The Times of Israel wrote on February 7:

“Dozens of countries expressed their ‘unwavering support’ for the International Criminal Court (ICC) on Friday, a day after US President Donald Trump authorized potentially far-reaching economic and travel sanctions against the court’s staff… The 79 signatories came from all parts of the world, but make up only about two-thirds of the 125 member states of the permanent court for the prosecution of war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and crimes of aggression.

“Among the countries who agreed to the statement were France, Germany and Britain. Among those absent were Australia, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Italy. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban had earlier on Friday made it clear he supported Trump’s move, which coincided with a visit to Washington by Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is wanted by the ICC over the war in Gaza.

“Trump’s sanctions target people who work on ICC investigations of US citizens or US allies, such as Israel… The Czech and Italian governments had no immediate comment on why they had not signed the declaration…

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and other EU leaders said Trump was wrong to impose sanctions on the ICC… ‘They jeopardize an institution that is supposed to ensure that the dictators of this world cannot simply persecute people and start wars, and that is very important.’…

“The US sanctions include freezing any US assets of those designated and barring them and their families from visiting the United States. It was unclear how quickly the US would announce names of people sanctioned…

“The United States, China, Russia and Israel are not members of the ICC. Trump signed the executive order after US Senate Democrats last week blocked a Republican-led effort to pass legislation setting up a sanctions regime targeting the war crimes court…

“Russia has also taken aim at the court. In 2023, the ICC issued an arrest warrant for President Vladimir Putin, accusing him of the war crime of illegally deporting hundreds of children from Ukraine. Russia has banned entry to ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan and placed him and two ICC judges on its wanted list.”

The ICC and ICJ Clown Courts

The Sun wrote on February 7:

“Donald Trump’s war on the International Criminal Court (ICC)  is a reckoning long overdue. Its credibility was already shot before it blew it up with its fact-mangling assault on Israel and arrest warrant for… Netanyahu over ‘war crimes’…. The ICC failure to recognize Israel as a democratic nation justifiably defending itself against racist terrorist still holding Jewish hostages betrayed a repugnant bias obliterating any legitimacy it had…

“And the same flaws are evident at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) too. The ICJ has no power over the UK in disputes with Commonwealth nations like Mauritius.  And its edict that Mauritius should be given our Chagos Islands despite having no valid claim to them is straightforwardly ludicrous.”

Biden Could Have Acts But Refused!

The Editorial Board of the New York Post wrote on February 7:

“Border Patrol chief Michael Banks announced Thursday that illegal border-crossing attempts have dropped 90% since President Trump took office less than three weeks ago. Which is the final proof that the Biden crew could’ve gotten the same results anytime in the last four years — had they actually wanted to. Instead, they fed the nation nonstop nonsense about how the border being ‘under control’ even as they manufactured more ways to speed up illegal entries and created new paths to ‘legalize’ border-jumping, at least as far as their official statistics were concerned.

For the last year, including all during the presidential campaign, Democrats insisted it was all Republicans’ fault, for refusing to pass a supposed ‘bipartisan’ bill. Hours after being sworn in, Trump declared a national emergency at the border, ended ‘catch and release,’ reestablished ‘Remain in Mexico,’ ordered construction on the wall to resume and sent 10,000 US troops to the border to help beef up security.

“Within a week, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, with the full support of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, started rounding up and shipping out illegal migrants busted for vile crimes

“Biden could have closed the border down at any time, but chose not to — and to lie about it instead. [He] could have issued the same executive orders Trump did — or just left in place the Trump policies that were working, instead of tossing them on Day 1. Border towns, along with cities and suburbs across the nation, paid the price; the border chaos also eased the way for fentanyl smugglers… The Biden team caused the border crisis and intentionally let it go on for four years…”

Biden’s border policy was a catastrophe indeed. His administration WAS greatly responsible for the border crisis. But of course, there will not be any accountability or reckoning. That’s what is wrong, among many other things, with our political system.

Chinese Spy Balloon Transported American Technology

Fox News wrote on February 11:

“A Chinese spy balloon that floated across the U.S. before being shot down off the South Carolina coast in 2023 was carrying technology from at least five American companies… Among the equipment recovered from the balloon were a satellite communication module, sensors and other sophisticated surveillance equipment… The Chinese spy balloon flew from Alaska to the East Coast, where it was shot down by the military over the Atlantic Ocean on Feb. 4, 2023…

“Beijing claimed it was a weather balloon, though an investigation by U.S. intelligence agencies found the balloon was used for spying… The identification of U.S.-made technology inside the balloon raises questions about commercially available equipment that can be sold to, or in some cases resold, to America’s adversaries.”

Sending EU Troops to Greenland?

The Telegraph wrote on February 7:

“Nato countries discussed deploying troops to Greenland in response to Donald Trump threatening the use of US military to seize the Danish island. Germany was among dozens of European allies understood to have held informal talks over ‘what Nato troops would do’ if the US president followed through on his threats, diplomatic sources told The Telegraph…

“Berlin’s involvement in the clandestine discussions has attracted criticism from some of Nato’s most ardent backers of Ukraine given the refusal of Olaf Scholz, the German chancellor, to consider a deployment of troops there… Mr Scholz has been Europe’s most vocal critic of Mr Trump over Greenland…

France and Germany have openly touted sending European troops to join the Americans already stationed there, but some European leaders have suggested staging a more robust ‘fight back’ against the US president’s overtures.

“In discussions inside Nato’s headquarters in Brussels, member states have pondered whether Article 5, which states that a military attack on one ally is considered an attack on all, could be invoked if Mr Trump does sanction an invasion of Greenland. However, the option was quickly ruled out because it would require the unanimous backing of Nato’s 32 member states, including the US. The mutual defence has only been triggered once in the alliance’s history, after the 9/11 attacks on America….”

Scholz hopes to score some points in Germany when attacking deeply unpopular Donald Trump. But this will not change the inevitable outcome—that Scholz will be gone soon.

EU Looks For Alternative to NATO

Blitz wrote on February 11:

“European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has reignited the debate on Europe’s defense autonomy by calling for an alternative to NATO. Her remarks, delivered during a press briefing in Lithuania on February 9, underscore growing concerns among EU leaders over reliance on the United States for security. As Washington increasingly pressures its NATO allies to ramp up defense spending, and amid uncertainty surrounding future American support for Ukraine, von der Leyen’s call signals a potential shift in European strategic thinking.

“Von der Leyen, while reaffirming NATO’s foundational role in European security, argued that the continent must bolster its own defense capabilities. ‘NATO remains the foundation of our defense. But it is evident that we need a pan-European defense,’ she stated, stressing that modern warfare requires cooperation on a scale no single European nation can manage alone. She called for increased defense investment, both from public coffers and private sources, and announced that a comprehensive European defense strategy would be presented to EU leaders by mid-March.

“The idea of a European defense force independent of NATO is not new. France and Germany have historically been its most vocal proponents, with French President Emmanuel Macron and former German Chancellor Angela Merkel pushing for ‘strategic autonomy’ from Washington. In 2019, Macron famously declared that NATO was ‘brain dead’ and advocated for a ‘true, European army.’ His sentiment echoed Germany’s push for greater military integration within the EU framework…

“Europe’s unease about US commitment to the continent’s security is not unfounded… the debate over European defense autonomy is unlikely to dissipate. The unpredictability of US foreign policy, combined with the growing perception that Europe must take greater responsibility for its security, will keep the issue at the forefront of EU policy discussions…

“For now, the EU stands at a crossroads, balancing between its long-standing reliance on NATO and the growing calls for strategic self-sufficiency. Von der Leyen’s remarks mark a significant step in that ongoing conversation—one that could reshape European security policy for years to come.”

Von der Leyen’s “politically correct” lip service towards NATO’s [disputed] “foundational role in European security” notwithstanding, it is clear what she is REALLY suggesting.

Trump’s Threats Towards Canada Are Real

Deutsche Welle wrote on February 7:

“Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told a group of business and labor leaders that [Trump’s] desire to control Canada ‘is a real thing’…  Trudeau made the remarks in a closed-door setting, but they were mistakenly transmitted via loudspeaker… ‘They’re very aware of our resources, of what we have and they very much want to be able to benefit from those,’ Trudeau said. ‘But Mr. Trump has it in mind that one of the easiest ways of doing that is absorbing our country. And it is a real thing.’

“Canada has oil, natural gas, diamonds and many other natural resources. The country is also a major potash producer, which is used in fertilizer to grow crops…”

In an interview on February 9 with Fox News, Trump expressed again his desire that Canada will become the 51st state of the USA.

Canada Looks at EU For Trading Partner

Reuters wrote on February 9:

“Canada wants to deepen its economic ties with the EU and uphold global trading rules in the face of threatened US tariffs, its trade minister Mary Ng told Reuters on February 8, 2025. The EU and Canada have benefited from a free trade agreement since 2017, which has boosted bilateral trade by 65%, and set up a raw materials partnership in 2021… She said critical minerals and smaller businesses would be among the focus areas with the EU. The EU, in particular, is keen to forge partnerships to secure metals that are key for the energy transition – cobalt, lithium and nickel – to reduce its dependence on China.
“Canada is also pushing to diversify its exports and set itself a target in 2018 of increasing non-U.S. exports by 50% by 2025. Ng said the country was on track to meet or exceed the target. Canada struck trade deals with Indonesia in December and Ecuador last week and is pushing hard in the Indo-Pacific region. The minister is leading a delegation including more than 200 businesses to Australia, Singapore and Brunei next week. ‘We are at the table with the countries in Southeast Asia, so the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. I took a very large delegation of Canadian businesses to the Philippines in December, to Indonesia, to markets like Vietnam, Malaysia, Japan, Korea,’ Ng added.

“Ottawa threatened retaliatory duties and legal action against the United States after President Donald Trump announced tariffs on Canada and Mexico a week ago and before he paused their imposition for 30 days. Ng said Canada could challenge Washington at the WTO if tariffs were imposed. ‘We would consider all of the options [which] are available to Canada because Canada is a country that believes in a rules-based trading system,’ Ng said.”

The USA is modern Manasseh, and Canada is part of modern Ephraim. The Bible prophesies that both will be fighting each other (compare Isaiah 9:21).

Trump’s Tariffs Plans

Newsmax wrote on February 12:

“President Donald Trump is likely to dust off a 1930 trade law largely forgotten for decades to back his new reciprocal U.S. tariffs that will match other countries’ higher import taxes, trade and legal experts say.

“Trump has said the new U.S. tariff rates would take effect ‘almost immediately,’ and Section 338 of the Trade Act of 1930 would give him a quick path to imposing them.

The law, threatened but never used to impose tariffs, appears only sporadically in government records. It allows the president to impose duties of up to 50% against imports from countries that are found to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

“Trump… has long complained about the U.S. charging lower tariff rates than most other countries… European Union’s 10% autos tariff, four times the 2.5% U.S. passenger car rate, is a particular sore spot for the president. ‘I think that is exactly the path that they’re going to follow,’ Dan Cannistra, a partner in the Crowell & Moring law firm, said of Section 338. ‘They’re going to tell the EU: “You’re giving Korea 0% on cars, you’re giving 10% to the U.S. You’re discriminating against us.”’…

“So far in his new term, Trump has favored tools that allowed immediate action on tariffs. These included a first-ever use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs – 10% on Chinese goods and a March deadline for 25% tariffs on Mexican and Canadian goods over fentanyl and border security. Trump simply modified his previous Section 232 metals proclamation Monday to quickly raise aluminum tariffs to 25% – matching steel tariffs – and to cancel all exemptions from steel and aluminum duties, effective March 12.”

“Judge Pauses Trump Plan to Put USAID Staff on Leave”

CNBC wrote on February 7:

“A federal judge on Friday said he would temporarily pause the Trump administration’s plan to place thousands of workers at the U.S. Agency for International Development on administrative leave. About 2,200 USAID employees were set to be placed on leave Friday night…

“Judge Carl Nichols, a Trump appointee, delivered the ruling after hearing arguments from the Trump administration and two groups representing federal workers in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. The workers’ groups… had argued [in] a court filing earlier Friday that USAID ‘is suffering an onslaught of unconstitutional and illegal attacks, leaving its workers, contractors, grantees, and beneficiaries deserted in the wreckage and a global humanitarian crisis in the wake.’…”

The judge was wondering why there was such a rush.

Ending Birthright Citizenship On Hold

Newsmax published the following article on February 6:

“A second federal judge in two days has blocked President Donald Trump’s effort to end birthright citizenship for the children of parents who are in the U.S. (without being citizens or green card holders), decrying what he described as the administration’s attempt to ignore the Constitution for political gain.

“U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour in Seattle on Thursday put Trump’s order on hold for the duration of lawsuits brought by four states and an immigrant rights group challenging it. His ruling followed one by a federal judge in Maryland in a separate but similar case involving immigrants’ rights groups and pregnant women whose soon-to-born children could be affected.

“Late Thursday the Justice Department appealed his order to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. It did not appear that the DOJ had yet appealed the Maryland ruling to the 4th Circuit…

“The president’s executive order seeks to end the automatic grant of citizenship to children born on U.S. soil to parents who are in the country illegally or who are here on a temporary, but lawful basis such as those on student or tourist visas

“At the heart of the lawsuits is the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1868 after the Civil War and the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision, which held that Scott, an enslaved man, wasn’t a citizen despite having been brought to a state where slavery was outlawed. The amendment holds that ‘all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.’

“The Trump administration, which has sought to curtail unlawful immigration, has asserted that noncitizens are not ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and their children born in the U.S. are not entitled to citizenship…

“The plaintiffs call that ludicrous, noting that illegal immigrants are required to pay taxes and follow the law, and that men ages 18 to 26 who are in the country illegally are still obligated to register for the U.S. Selective Service System, meaning they could be drafted to fight for the U.S. in a war. ‘It is patently absurd for defendants to contend that a person who can be conscripted into the military — forced to fight for this country — is not subject to its jurisdiction,’ Matt Adams, legal director for the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, told Coughenour.

“The plain meaning of the 14th Amendment has been recognized since it was ratified, notably in an 1898 U.S. Supreme Court decision. That decision, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, held that the only children who did not automatically receive U.S. citizenship upon being born on U.S. soil were children of diplomats, who have allegiance to another government; enemies present in the U.S. during hostile occupation; those born on foreign ships; and those born to members of sovereign Native American tribes.

“In 1924, Congress passed a separate law granting birthright citizenship to Native Americans.”

The Associated Press wrote on February 10:

“A third federal judge on Monday blocked President Donald Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship for the children of people in the U.S. illegally [this is again a wrong characterization of the issue, but the mass media does not seem to get it straight].

“The ruling from U.S. District Judge Joseph N. Laplante in New Hampshire (he was nominated by George W. Bush in 2007) comes after two similar rulings by judges in Seattle and Maryland last week.

“A lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union contends that Trump’s order violates the Constitution and ‘attempts to upend one of the most fundamental American constitutional values.’”

An illegal alien who breaks the law is not under US jurisdiction—meaning, he cannot be punished???? This is ludicrous indeed. Trump is bound to lose this one… IF the US Supreme Court upholds the Constitution.

“God Ordained America to Be Most Exceptional Nation Ever”

Breitbart wrote on February 6:

“President Donald Trump said Thursday at the National Prayer Breakfast that Americans are a ‘people ordained by God’ to live in the ‘freest and most exceptional nation’ in the world’s history. Trump said that Americans are reclaiming their rightful identity, touching on themes of Manifest Destiny and American exceptionalism… ‘We believe in our destiny, and trust in the providence of Almighty God.’”

Ancient Israel and modern America (as part of the descendants of the ancient House of Israel) had and have indeed a God-given destiny. Sadly, neither have been living up to their obligations.

Paula White to Lead New White House Faith Office

Israel 365 News wrote on February 7:

“U.S. President Donald Trump announced Thursday at the National Prayer Breakfast that he would create a White House Faith Office… ‘led by Pastor Paula White, who is so amazing,’ Trump said. Paula White is an outspoken supporter of Israel who has been at the forefront of advocating for the Jewish State since October 7th

“‘Pastor Paula is like an Esther figure, who God put in the palace of the king “for such a time as this”’ said Rabbi Weisz. ‘We pray for God’s blessings upon Paula and Jonathan, and her children Brad and Rachel for their continued leadership advocating for a renewal of faith in the United States. May God grant Pastor Paula wisdom and strength to fulfill President Trump’s vision for America, and for peace through strength in Israel and the region.’”

Who is Paula White? The following articles explain.

Business Insider wrote about White on November 5, 2020:

“President Donald Trump’s spiritual advisor Paula White led a passionate prayer event on Wednesday in a bid to secure his reelection. During a [livestreamed] prayer broadcast… White claimed that ‘demonic confederacies’ were attempting to steal the election from Trump. ‘I hear victory, victory, victory, victory in the quarters of heaven,’ White said as she closed her eyes and gestured passionately.

“At one point White proclaimed that ‘angels are being dispatched right now’ and appeared to speak in tongues. ‘Angels are being dispatched from Africa right now,’ she said, adding, ‘They’re coming here.’”

“Speaking in tongues, in which a person utters sounds thought of as a secret language unknown to the speaker, features in Pentecostal and charismatic Christianity,  as well as other religions.”

The video of her prayer broadcast can still be viewed on the Internet. It is something to behold. To follow such a lady and place her in charge of the “White House Faith Office” and view her as spiritual advisor is shocking, to say the very least. In her prayer broadcast, she appeared to be under some influence.

Christians in Shock Over Heretic Preacher Paula White Leading White House Faith Office

Daily Mail wrote on February 8:

“Trump has sparked a backlash from leading Christians over his appointment of a controversial televangelist to the White House. The president on Friday signed an executive order to open a White House Faith Office to be led by Paula White, his longtime spiritual adviser… But the move sparked fury from Christian leaders who believe that White, a megachurch pastor from Florida, preaches an interpretation of the gospel that critics argue exploits the most vulnerable.

“White teaches followers that God will reward them if they donate to her church, going as far as to suggest precise sums over a thousand dollars to ensure their ‘salvation’. ‘This is an abomination,’ wrote Christian motivational speaker Scott Ross on X…. ‘Worse, she has lived a life of scandal, with multiple husbands, twisting the Gospel for profit.’

“The teachings of the minister, who is married to rockstar and Journey lead singer Jonathan Cain, have nevertheless rubbed off on Trump who first contacted her by phone in 2002 after watching one of her TV shows… Ross… went as far as to argue that White’s appointment was the ‘worst and most dangerous thing’ Trump could have done. ‘Lord, have mercy on our country and this administration,’ he wrote on X.  

“Christian blogger Chris Hohnholz wrote on X: ‘Not every choice he makes will be a home run, we understand that. But this? This is a train wreck… sir, you need to reverse course on this ASAP. Not only is Paula White not biblically qualified to be a pastor, she is a false teacher leading people to Hell. Do not do this, sir.’

“A MAGA fan called TexasClare on X wrote: ‘True evangelicals who have Trump’s ear (like @Franklin_Graham ) need to get him off the “Pastor” Paula White train.’ John Mason, host of the Living God’s Truth podcast, stated: ‘Even though President Trump is enforcing laws that line up with our values, that doesn’t mean he has any clue what biblical Christianity is or why it matters. Paula White is a known heretic and known false teacher who has no regard for the Gospel of Jesus Christ.’

“Jon Root, a conservative YouTuber, stated: ‘This is the worst decision President Trump has made since taking office… Paula White is a heretic, who peddles the prosperity gospel. Plus, women should not be pastors according to The Bible.’…

“Southern Baptist theologian Russell D. Moore told the Washington Post in 2017 that ‘Paula is a charlatan and recognized as a heretic by every orthodox Christian, of whatever tribe.’…”

Paula White is wrong in many respects when it comes to her understanding of the Bible. The next article is quite illuminating in this regard. We actually could not care less if it wasn’t for her tremendous (negative) influence on Donald Trump who, as America’s President, is obviously adopting many of her wrong concepts.

Paula White’s Wrong Teachings on Immigration

Vox wrote the following in an article, dated July 11, 2018, which recently surfaced:

“In recent weeks and months, a number of prominent evangelical leaders associated with President Donald Trump’s unofficial evangelical advisory council, as well as members of Trump’s administration, have used Biblical precedent to defend Trump’s policy of family separation at the US-Mexico border. Few, however, have been as brazen as Paula White… who told the right-leaning faith-based (CBN) that Jesus could not have broken any immigration laws during his family’s flight to Egypt because Jesus, who was without sin, could not therefore have broken the law.

“White spent the interview defending Trump on his policy of family separation, calling the camps in which migrant children are being detained ‘amazing.’ She argued for the Biblical precedent of family separation…

“In recent weeks, the Southern Baptist Convention passed a resolution in favor of the dignity of refugees, the United States Council of Catholic Bishops has condemned family separation, and the United Methodist Church has initiated formal expulsion proceedings against Attorney General Jeff Sessions for his role in the family separation crisis…

“This is not the first time that White has argued for the inalienable, divinely ordained precedence of GOP government authority, nor used the Bible to justify a broad view of government intervention. Last year, she made headlines for telling an interviewer that Trump was ‘raised by God.’ (She later walked back her comments under direct questioning, declaring that God chooses every human leader.)

“More broadly, Trump’s evangelical allies frequently use the language of Christian nationalism to code Trump as a divinely chosen figure whose will is therefore no less divinely sanctioned… The idea of laws being inflexible and authority being absolute — the kind of mentality suggested by the Trump administration’s devotion to one interpretation of Romans 13 — is central to the conflation of GOP party politics and white evangelicalism. Even when it doesn’t hold up to Biblical scrutiny.”

White is totally wrong when she says that Jesus could not have broken HUMAN laws; otherwise, He would have sinned. See our free booklet “Obeying God Rather Than Man.” White is also totally wrong when she says that God chooses every human leader. It is SATAN who rules this world and he gives his throne, might and authority to whomever HE wills (compare Luke 4:5-6-7; Revelation 13:2). Finally, the concept that Romans 13 makes Trump somewhat of a pope who can’t do wrong and that he has to be obeyed even if he was wrong, is absolutely appalling. Compare our Q&As on Romans 13, https://www.eternalgod.org/q-a-12272/ and https://www.eternalgod.org/q-a-4056/

Austria Can’t Get It Done

Deutsche Welle wrote on February 12:

“Coalition talks between Austria’s far-right Freedom Party and the conservative Austrian People’s Party have buckled, with the two parties deadlocked over how posts should be assigned. FPÖ leader Kickl… on Wednesday said talks with the conservative People’s Party (ÖVP) had failed after a meeting with Austrian President Alexander Van der Bellen in Vienna…

“The FPÖ emerged from the parliamentary elections in September as the strongest force. No one had initially wanted to form a coalition with it, so the second-placed ÖVP was given the mandate to form a government. However, the three-way coalition talks that followed, between the conservatives, the Social Democrats (SPÖ) and the centrist, liberal NEOS failed. Van der Bellen then commissioned… Kicks to try to form a government in the now-failed negotiations with the ÖVP…

“The two parties appear hopelessly at odds over numerous areas, including EU policy and the treatment of asylum seekers. The conservatives want the far right, which has slammed EU sanctions on Russia over its invasion of Ukraine, to clarify its position on Moscow…

“What might happen now? One likely possibility is President Van der Bellen instructing the ÖVP to lead new coalition talks aimed at forming a centrist government… A coalition of the ÖVP and SPÖ would have a majority of just one seat, which is widely seen as impractical because it would mean that a single lawmaker’s absence could jeopardize the government’s agenda…

“Alternatively, there could be new elections. Then, according to polling, the FPÖ could extend its lead over the other parties. In September’s election, it garnered nearly 29% of the vote, ahead of the ÖVP on 26.3%…”

Majority of German Voters Want a Government Coalition of AfD and CDU

Apollo News wrote on February 11:

“According to a new survey, a majority of voters want an end to the firewall – they are in favor of a black-blue government coalition after the federal election. Alliances between the Union and left-wing parties are met with significantly less approval. ‘The Union would “sell its soul” – that is what Friedrich Merz keeps saying when he is asked about the possibility of a coalition with the AfD. The Union’s candidate for chancellor wants to hold on to the firewall… According to a new analysis by the polling institute Ipsos, however, he is acting against the will of the voters.

“The survey, which was published last Thursday, shows that a black-blue coalition would be the most popular government option among voters. 23 percent of citizens would like the AfD and CDU to work together. Meanwhile, significantly fewer people favor a coalition between the Union and a left-wing party.

“Neither a black-green coalition (five percent) nor a black-red [SPD] coalition (19 percent) achieve the popularity ratings of a possible black-blue government…

“In the last Ipsos poll, which was published a few weeks ago, a new grand coalition between the CDU/CSU and SPD was the most popular coalition option. Since then, however, the black-blue coalition has gained five percentage points in support among voters.

“In the Ipsos Sunday question, the CDU/CSU lost a little in support. Compared to the last poll, it fell by one percentage point and is now at 29 percent. The AfD, meanwhile, has gained significantly and is at 21 percent. The SPD (16 percent) and the ailing Greens (13 percent) follow a long way behind…

“Both the BSW, FDP and the Left Party are now worried about entering the Bundestag. According to the latest figures from Ipsos, of the three parties, only Wagenknecht’s BSW would narrowly clear the five percent hurdle. The other two parties each have [only] four percent of voter approval.”

Some of the published comments on this article are interesting:

“What the population wants is irrelevant to the red-green-black-yellow unity party. The desire for a different migration policy continues to be ignored… In a coalition with Merz, the AfD will lose its soul…. Perhaps we will vote again in the fall.”

Mass Protests Against AfD… Who Is Behind Them?

Breitbart wrote on February 9:

“Hundreds of thousands of protesters took to the streets of Germany over the past week to demonstrate against the so-called ‘far-right’, however, a top publication has reported that activist groups involved have been funded by the left-wing government in Berlin.

“A supposedly organic outpouring of opposition to the surging Alternative for Germany (AfD) ahead of the federal elections on February 23rd has been called into question by a report from Bild, the highest circulation newspaper in Europe, which quipped that the ‘distances from the government district to the mass demonstrations are quite short.’

“Last Sunday, around 160,000 people demonstrated in Berlin over the decision by the centrist Christian Democratic Union (CDU) to join with the populist AfD on an immigration vote (The Associated Press reported on February 8 that “more than 200,000 protestors rallied in Munich on Saturday” against the AfD).

“One of the main organisers of the event was the ‘Together against the right’ activist network, which was identified by Bild as being a cutout for the leftist group Campact. According to the paper, Campact is the main shareholder in the NGO HateAid, which has received nearly 2.5 million euros from the federal government since 2020.

“The Association for Environmental Protection and Nature Conservation (BUND), which has also been active in organising against the rise of the political right in Germany, was found by the report to have secured around two million euros in funding from the Ministry of Economic Affairs, led by Green chancellor candidate and outgoing finance minister Robert Habeck. The left-wing environmentalist group is also said to have received six-figure handouts from both the Ministry of the Environment and Education in 2023…

“Another group active in organising against upswell in support of the AfD has been the ‘grandmas against the right’, which was involved in a demonstration of around 24,000 people in Hanover on Saturday. The group has reportedly received at least 23,000 euros from the federal government.

“It is not the first time that left-wing organisations funded by the German government have targeted the anti-mass migration party. In 2023, the taxpayer-subsidised and Soros-funded non-profit Correctiv published an ‘undercover’ investigative report claiming that a conference attended by AfD members and Austrian identitarian activist Martin Sellner had seen calls for the ‘deportations of people from Germany based on a set of racist criteria, regardless of whether or not they have German citizenship.’ Attendees, including a member of the centrist Christian Democratic Union (CDU), denied the leftist organisation’s claims, which were based on hearsay rather than in-person journalism.

“Nevertheless, the ensuing scandal resulted in millions of protesters taking to the streets and the AfD suffering a setback in the polls. In addition to facing government-funded activism, there have been calls [to] ban the [AfD] party altogether to supposedly protect democracy. Despite this, the party has continued to grow in support, particularly in the wake of multiple terror attacks over the past year committed in Germany by migrants.

“This has coincided with a drastic decline in support for the governing leftist Social Democratic Party (SPD). According to a poll by the Tyson Group, conducted on behalf of the American-based EU-US Forum, a ‘staggering’ 70 per cent of Germans disapprove of SPD Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s job performance. Tyson Group Vice President Alex Alvarado noted that it comes amid a broader pushback against leftist governments throughout the European Union, with the survey finding that a majority in France, Germany, and the Netherlands believe the EU is heading in the wrong direction…”

“We Produce More Ammunition Than the Americans”

Handelsblatt wrote on February 7:

“At the Handelsblatt ‘Security and Defense’ conference, the arms industry is calling for better planning and long-term orders… So far, the production of important armaments such as battle tanks is lagging behind, which is due to the low order quantities and the fact that there are no long-term commitments for financing… According to EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, Russia could be in a position to attack a NATO country in Europe as early as 2028.

“The Russian army is continuing to arm itself, says Inspector General Breuer. New weapon systems such as tanks and artillery ammunition are not going to the front in Ukraine, but are being used to equip new units that are facing west. ‘I am convinced that Putin will never be satisfied with Ukraine,’ says Breuer…

“But it is also clear that with US President Trump taking office, Europe can no longer rely on the unconditional support of NATO’s largest member… there are things in which Europe is even better than the Americans, says Papperger. The Rheinmetall boss primarily refers to tanks and armored vehicles as well as ammunition. However, Europe often gets in its own way with its complicated procurement processes and national egoism…

“’If we don’t have any big players in Europe, we can’t compete with the USA, China or Russia,’ says Papperger. In his view, Europe must orientate itself towards the USA in terms of consolidation. There are the ‘Big Five’ there with the companies Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Boeing, Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems… ‘I am convinced that things have to go in a similar direction in Europe,’ he says.”

And they will… very soon.

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News

Please note: Before Trump agreed to a last-minute postponement of tariffs against Canada and Mexico, numerous articles had been written warning of terrible consequences if those tariffs would be imposed, as had been announced by Trump. We begin with covering these articles, and then continue with articles about the postponements, which may or may not put the matter to rest.

Global Tariff and Trade War…

Reuters wrote on February 1: 

‘U.S. President Donald Trump is… threatening to ignite a trade war that could disrupt more than $2.1 trillion of annual trade… Just 12 days into his second term, Trump is upending the norms of how the United States is governed and interacts with the wider world. On Friday, he pledged to proceed with the levies [25% against Mexico and Canada, and 10% against China] despite acknowledging they could cause disruption and hardship for American households.

“A model gauging the economic impact of Trump’s tariff plan from EY Chief Economist Greg Daco suggests it would reduce U.S. growth by 1.5 percentage points this year, throw Canada and Mexico into recession and usher in ‘stagflation’ at home… That volatility was evident on Friday, when the Mexican peso and Canadian dollar both slumped after Trump vowed to fulfil his threats. U.S. stock prices also fell and Treasury bond yields rose…

“… during a lengthy White House exchange with reporters, Trump brushed aside the notion that his threats were merely bargaining tools…  He also said revenue was a factor and the tariffs may be increased… Trump did, however, mention a potential carve-out for oil from Canada, saying that tariff rate would be 10%. But he indicated that wider tariffs on oil and natural gas would be coming in mid-February, remarks that sent oil prices higher. At nearly $100 billion in 2023, imports of crude oil accounted for roughly a quarter of all U.S. imports from Canada, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.

“Trump acknowledged that higher costs could be passed on to consumers and that his actions may cause short-term disruptions, but said he was not concerned about their impact on financial markets. Jake Colvin, president of the National Foreign Trade Council, which represents major U.S. companies, said imposing tariffs on key trading partners ‘could impact the cost and availability of everything from avocados to air conditioners to cars and risks shifting the focus of our relationships away from constructive dialogue.’

“Although Trump speaks of ‘charging’ other nations for tariffs, they are paid by importing companies, and sometimes passed on to consumers. Automakers would be particularly hard hit, through tariffs on vehicles assembled in Canada and Mexico. Their vast regional supply chain, where components can cross borders several times before final assembly, would further exacerbate these costs.

“And Trump said import taxes were also being considered on European goods, as well as on steel, aluminum and copper, and on drugs and semiconductors… It typically takes weeks for tariffs to take practical effect. Trump’s move is expected to draw retaliatory tariffs, potentially disrupting more than $2.1 trillion in annual two-way U.S. trade with its top three trading partners.”

Mexico supplies about 90% of the avocados consumed in the United States, totaling an estimated $2.7 billion in imports for 2024. While Trump had originally justified tariffs with drugs coming in from Mexico, China and Canada, he recently emphasized more, if not exclusively, the economic aspect, stating that the USA has been unfairly treated by these countries. Of course, tariffs against Europe could not be based on illegal immigration or the allegation that drugs are coming in from there.  It would be strictly on an economical and commercial basis.

Self-Inflicted Wounds?

The Associated Press wrote on January 28:

“Having already forced Colombia to accept deportees by threatening a 25% tariff, President Donald Trump is readying the same move against Canada and Mexico as soon as Saturday. But this time, the stakes are higher and many economists surveying the possible damage… [and warn of] self-inflicted wounds from the tariffs…

“[It is estimated] that taxes paid on imports in the transportation sector from all of Trump’s tariff plans, which include new taxes on China and other countries, could increase from $4 billion a year to $68 billion. It’s unclear how companies would absorb those costs or possibly pass them along to consumers.”

No doubt they would be passed on to consumers. And they would not be happy about Trump’s new economic policies, when they can’t put food on their tables. Biden and Harris were, to a large extent, defeated because of the poor economy with the expectation that the USA will do better under Trump. Now it appears that the USA would do worse. Maybe that was part of the reason why Trump caved in at the last minute…

Canada and Mexico to Retaliate

Bloomberg wrote on February 2:

“Canada and Mexico vowed to hit back at the US after President Donald Trump followed through on threats to impose 25% tariffs on imports of their goods, instigating a trade war that’s set to reshape global supply chains. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said the country will impose 25% tariffs against… US goods, while Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum also pledged retaliation. China vowed “corresponding countermeasures” to Trump’s 10% levy on Chinese products…

“The Republican’s orders also included retaliation clauses that would increase US tariffs if the countries respond in kind. The new measures will be on top of existing trade levies on those countries. Energy imports from Canada, including oil and electricity, will be spared from the full 25% levy and will face a 10% tariff…. Trump’s move is explosive in scale and goes well beyond his first-term tariffs. Steep tariffs will raise the cost of key goods like food, housing and gasoline for Americans, while the overall fallout threatens to spill widely across the countries…”

USA and Canada… A New Low

Reuters wrote on February 2:

“… relations between the long-time allies who share the world’s longest land border reach a new low

“The Canadian leader said tariffs would include American beer, wine and bourbon, as well as fruits and fruit juices, including orange juice from Trump’s home state of Florida. Canada would also target goods including clothing, sports equipment and household appliances. Trudeau said the coming weeks would be difficult for Canadians but that Americans would also suffer from Trump’s actions…

“Trudeau encouraged Canadians to buy Canadian products and vacation at home rather than in the U.S…”

Everything to Become More Expensive?

The New York Post wrote on February 1:

“The tariffs could mean significant price increases for ordinary Americans on everyday products… Trump’s tariffs will likely lead to more expensive cars at least in the short term before American suppliers can ramp up to fill the shortfall.

“The tariffs could also reduce consumer spending power by $90 billion on smartphones, TVs, laptops and tablets, video game consoles, headphones and other popular electronics, according to the Consumer Technology Association.  Laptops and tablets could see 45% price increases while similar double-digit increases for smartphones and video games could also be on the offing. ‘The likelihood of retailers or any importer absorbing the tariff cost is very low, so the pass through to consumers will be quick,’ Ed Brzytwa, vice president of international trade at CTA [said].

“The Peterson Institute has estimated Trump’s… tariffs would cost the typical US household over $2,600 a year.”

And that would not even include further tariffs because of retaliation and tariffs for other countries and power blocs, such as the EU.  

The EU Tariff Bomb Shell 

Daily Mail wrote on January 31:

“Trump has announced he will impose tariffs on the European Union… Trump said at the White House Friday he would ‘absolutely‘ put tariffs on the nation’s EU allies. ‘The European Union has treated us so terribly,’ Trump told reporters as he inked new executive orders…

“He said the tariffs on the EU would be ‘very substantial,’ without providing details. It was not immediately clear when those tariffs would go into place.”

It is clear that tariffs against Europe would have nothing to do with illegal drugs flooding the American market. 

Europe Will Retaliate

The Financial Times wrote on February 2:

“The EU has said it regrets US President Donald Trump’s decision to hit Canada, Mexico and China with sweeping tariffs, and said it would respond firmly if a threat to expand the trade measures to Europe was fulfilled.

“Trump sparked a global trade war this weekend…

“Trump imposed the blanket tariffs against Canada and Mexico by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which allows him to take measures in response to ‘an unusual and extraordinary threat.’ [It authorizes the President to regulate imports during a national emergency declared under the National Emergencies Act. It was interpreted to apply here due to the three nations’ tolerance of illegal immigrants and fentanyl] He would need to find justification to potentially use the same tool against the EU, or use tariffs targeting certain industrial sectors on security grounds…”

Even though Trump invoked the IEEPA to justify tariffs due to illegal immigration and fentanyl, Trump’s overriding goal seems to be much more encompassing, as the following articles point out.

Europe’s Reaction

The Guardian wrote on February 3:

“EU leaders have signalled that the bloc would be prepared to retaliate against the US if Donald Trump followed through on his threats to impose tariffs on European goods…

“… French president Emmanuel Macron said that if Europe is ‘attacked in terms of trade … [it] will have to stand up for itself and therefore react.’ Polish prime minister Donald Tusk said the EU should do all it can to avoid ‘totally unnecessary and stupid tariff wars,’ adding it would be a ‘cruel paradox’ if the bloc was forced into a trade war with a long-standing ally. Danish prime minister Mette Frederiksen, who is already embroiled in a separate crisis with Trump over the future of Greenland, said that while she would typically ‘never support fighting allies, if the US puts tough tariffs on Europe, we need a collective and robust response.’

“Luxembourg’s prime minister Luc Frieden also said that ‘the answer to tariffs is to reply with [the] same action’… German chancellor Olaf Scholz said any tariffs would be ‘bad for the US and bad for Europe’… “ 

ENR added on February 4:

“The EU summit was almost entirely focused on defense, but the transatlantic relationship with the US was also high on the agenda… According to the Commission President (Ursula von der Leyen), a lot is at stake… the European Union is prepared for a ‘robust, but constructive dialogue with the United States,’ but will not accept everything. ‘We are ready’ for a possible conflict, she warned.”

The alienation between the EU and the USA will continue… 

Tariffs on Hold for Thirty Days

The New York Post wrote on February 3:

“President Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced a temporary deal Monday evening to halt the imposition of 25% tariffs on each other’s imports for 30 days while a final border security pact gets hashed out. Trump, 78, and Trudeau, 53, spoke on the phone twice Monday before announcing the agreement, with Canada set to ensure 10,000 troops will be stationed at the northern border and the PM vowing to take steps to crack down on fentanyl smuggling….

“Earlier Monday, Trump and Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum announced a similar monthlong pause on the looming 25% tariff against America’s southern neighbor. Mexico confirmed plans to dispatch 10,000 troops to the US border and claimed that Washington would help crack down on illegal weapons trafficking into its territory….

“The tariff-adoring president has also been musing about issuing similar threats against European countries as well as the United Kingdom.”

Justifying the postponement with working on border security pacts is clearly not the only reason for the tariffs, as the threat towards Europe and the UK demonstrates. But Trump might have realized that, for now, the American people would not stand for having to pay much more for goods and necessities. Conservative papers and outlets described the postponement as a victory for Trump. In reality, if anything, it was a Pyrrhic victory.

The Guardian wrote on February 3:

“It is the third time in two weeks the US president has delayed his threatened 25% tariffs on the two countries. China is still set to face additional 10% levy on its exports to the US from Tuesday…

“The agreements came on a day of extreme volatility in global financial markets as rattled investors reacted to the prospect of a dramatically escalating dispute involving the world’s largest economies… Economists have warned Trump’s planned wave of tariffs would risk raising prices for millions of Americans, just weeks after he pledged, upon taking office, to ‘rapidly’ bring them down… [Trump] conceded over the weekend that they could cause ‘a little pain’ in the US.

“Markets sold off sharply worldwide in response to what has been described as a ‘Trump tariff tantrum’ before recovering some of their losses after news broke of the deal with Mexico. Wall Street fell in early trading, with the S&P 500 down almost 2%. Share prices in Europe followed a sharp move lower in Asia. London’s FTSE 100 index dropped 1.4% from Friday’s record high before making back some of its losses to trade down 1%….”

Trump Delays Canada Tariffs, But Anger Persists

Al Jazeera wrote on February 3:

Canada has experienced a tumultuous start to 2025, with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announcing his resignation days into the new year, a federal election looming, and the country’s affordability crisis deepening. Now, Canada is facing what some economists have dubbed ‘its largest trade shock in nearly 100 years’.

“United States President Donald Trump has threatened to impose 25-percent tariffs on a wide range of Canadian imports and 10-percent tariffs on Canadian energy. While the measures were set to begin on Tuesday, Trudeau said on Monday afternoon that the US tariffs and retaliatory measures announced by his government would be delayed by ‘at least 30 days’ as the countries work together on border security.

“Yet for many across the country, the potential for a trade war between the longtime allies continues to fuel a sense of anger, as well as anxiety and confusion over what is to come. Trump’s treat of tariffs has also raised questions about the nature of the cross-border relationship and spurred calls for Canada to boost in-country trade while looking beyond the US for more reliable international partners

“Asa McKercher, a professor at St Francis Xavier University who studies Canada-US relations…  said the current trade tensions have plunged the relationship to its lowest point. ‘We haven’t really seen the Americans go out of their way to impose a policy that will just destroy the Canadian economy…’  He said that since Trump signed the order authorising tariffs against Canada and Trudeau unveiled reciprocal measures, there has been an uptick in nationalist sentiment in Canada. Canadian crowds booed the US national anthem at hockey and basketball games over the weekend, while the leaders of several provinces have urged people to ‘buy Canadian’ in response to the tariffs… ‘We’re really subject to the whims of a guy in the White House, and that’s a very scary thing.’..

“Even as Canada appears to have secured a reprieve from US tariffs — at least for now — many Canadians have expressed anger at Trump’s repeated threats against their country. Last week, political, labour and civil society leaders released the ‘Pledge for Canada’ to build a nationwide response to the Trump administration’s policies. That includes protecting Canadian sovereignty, reducing the country’s ‘dependence on the United States by diversifying our trade’, and building alliances with other countries… ‘We have a president that rips up trade agreements. We have a president that threatens us daily with measures that would throw our economy into a recession. These are not the actions of an ally.’”

The emotional damage which Trump has inflicted on the Canadian people will not be easily repaired… if at all…

Putin Praises Trump

Newsweek wrote on February 3:

“Calling Trump a ‘master,’ Putin said the U.S. leader will restore order in Europe quite quickly with his character and persistence. ‘You’ll see, it will happen quickly—soon, they will all stand at the feet of the master and will gently wag their tails. Everything will fall into place,’ the Russian president said…

“The Kremlin on Monday said it was watching on as ‘tensions’ build between the U.S. and its allies. ‘You know, there are many tensions there, so, of course, we have no desire to be associated with all this in any way or to evaluate it in any way,’ Kremlin press secretary Dmitry Peskov told reporters in his daily press briefing. ‘Let those countries that are participating in this process sort it out,’ he said..

“Criticizing his European counterparts on Sunday, Putin said European leaders on the Continent lacked conviction in their beliefs. Praising former European leaders such as France’s Charles De Gaulle, Jacques Chirac and Germany’s Gerhard Schroeder, Putin said such leaders ‘had their own opinion and the courage to fight for this opinion, to express it, to talk about it and to try to at least implement it in practical work.’ ‘Today, there are practically no such people there,’ Putin said.”

We wonder what Putin means by “order” to be restored in Europe by Trump. Putin’s friend and former Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder is one of the most unpopular former political leaders in Germany. Putin’s praise for Trump and his rejection of Europe is telling… and deeply concerning.

China Retaliates

The Associated Press wrote on February 4:

“China announced retaliatory tariffs on select American imports and an antitrust investigation into Google on Tuesday, just minutes after a sweeping levy on Chinese products imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump took effect.”

“The Ultimate Goal Remains Unclear”

The Wall Street Journal wrote on February 3:

“The postwar bipartisan consensus that the U.S. prospers by fostering cooperation and integration with allies and neighbors is gone… Trump’s motives are difficult to discern… Drugs and migrants might turn out to be a pretext for bigger, long-term goals

“Philip Verleger, a longtime energy economist, writes… that Trump ‘intends to ‘Make America Great Again’…by diminishing the power of every other country. Cooperation is not an objective. His focus is dominance.’… Trump’s second-term actions make little distinction between adversaries and allies….”

This could very well be an accurate assessment. It appears true that “drugs and migrants might turn out to be a pretext for bigger, long-term goals,” which would clearly be interpreted as being hostile towards Europeans and others, “necessitating” a response.

RFK to Be Appointed?

NBC News wrote on February 4:

“Robert F. Kennedy Jr. cleared a key hurdle Tuesday after a Senate panel voted to advance his nomination to be health and human services secretary to the full chamber. In a 14-13 vote along party lines, the Senate Finance Committee pushed through Kennedy’s nomination after he managed to allay concerns raised by Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La. Cassidy, a doctor, was the one potential swing vote on the panel…

“Cassidy addressed the full Senate after the vote, saying he received a series of promises from Kennedy, a longtime anti-vaccine activist, including that he would maintain the Center for Disease Control’s advisory committee on immunization practices, and would not remove statements on the CDC’s website noting that vaccines don’t cause autism… Last week, Cassidy had said he needed to hear an unequivocal statement from Kennedy that vaccines do not cause autism and indicate he would listen to well-established science on the matter. It was still unclear on Tuesday whether Kennedy had made that assertion.

“Even as Cassidy said he received various assurances from Kennedy about supporting the efficacy of vaccines, the nominee’s firm ties to the anti-vaccine community were unmistakable… Minutes before the committee’s vote, Trump attempted to provide a boost to Kennedy on Truth Social. 20 years ago, Autism in children was 1 in 10,000. NOW IT’S 1 in 34. WOW! Something’s really wrong. We need BOBBY!!! Thank You! DJT.’”

During the hearings, Kennedy did NOT agree with the contention that vaccines do not cause autism. If he did agree with that contention now, that would be an incredible and quite frankly shameful turn-a-round.

On August 5, 2024, at a campaign rally on June 22, 2024, Trump told the audience: “I will not give one penny to any school that has a vaccine mandate.” Given that every public school in the United States has vaccine mandates, this would mean eliminating all federal funding for public schools.

Medical Express wrote on January 28, 2025:

“With President Donald Trump having threatened school vaccine mandates for children during his campaign, a new survey finds that nearly three-quarters of U.S. adults support requiring that children be vaccinated against preventable diseases such as measles, mumps, and rubella. To protect children who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons, over half of Americans also support states prohibiting other unvaccinated children from attending school, either private or public.”

The degree of uninformed Americans who are denying the dangers of vaccinations is stupefying.

Trump’s (Mis-)Handling of Emergencies

The Wall Street Journal wrote on January 31:

“President Trump’s handling of two crises this week—one, a bureaucratic mess and the other, a horrific tragedy —quickly shifted the White House from inaugural euphoria to the realities of governing. His defiant stand in the face of nationwide confusion and fear left some aides scrambling to fortify the image of a White House that could do no wrong. But he handled both problems with the same approach: deflecting blame and attacking Democrats, the media and his predecessors. His message was an amplified version of what he has tried to exude since taking office: He is in charge.

“The country also received its first live-action glimpse of a White House and cabinet that is being hastily assembled and crafting policies on the fly that in one case had to be quickly reversed.

“On Monday, a memo written by an acting director of the White House’s budget office caused a widespread panic and might have inadvertently led the Medicaid system to freeze in less than 24 hours. On Thursday, Trump’s new Defense and Transportation chiefs were thrust in the middle of investigating the worst domestic airplane crash in two decades…

“Trump announced the appointment of a new acting Federal Aviation Administration director [Sean Duffy] less than 24 hours after an American Airlines plane collided with an Army helicopter over the Potomac River, killing 67 people… he speculated the accident could have been caused [with no evidence whatsoeverbecause of ‘diversity, equity and inclusion’ policies stretching back to the Obama administration… [This was a terribly embarrassing performance which was totally disrespectful to the victims and survivors. [It has now been established that the accident occurred because the helicopter flew 100 feet too high.]

“On camera and on Truth Social all week, Trump governed with his usual confidence and bravado. But behind the scenes, there was evidence of frustration and breakdowns in communication in an administration that has moved with lightning speed to try to shake up the government… The budget memo, calling for a pause in federal spending on an unspecified number of programs effective the next day was issued without the knowledge of senior staff, people familiar with its release said, even though they were forced to quickly defend it…

“Republican lawmakers immediately defended the spending freeze but they were hit with questions from constituents about veterans programs being halted as well as potential cuts to Medicaid, which provides benefits to low-income Americans and many with disabilities… Meanwhile, consternation was unfolding across the country. Kelly Neidel, executive director of a Head Start agency that serves more than 240 children outside Chicago, said even a partial-day freeze of federal funding for her organization created massive stress for her employees and families they serve. ‘We notified parents that your child no longer has a place to go,’ she said. ‘It was chaos.’…”

This could be a bad sign for things to come. 

Another TRO

npr wrote on January 31:

“A judge with the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island has issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) blocking the Trump administration’s efforts to freeze payments for grants and other programs.

“The Friday ruling stems from a lawsuit filed earlier this week by Democratic attorneys general in 22 states and the District of Columbia. It is separate from a lawsuit filed by Democracy Forward and other non-profit groups that resulted in a separate federal judge’s decision to temporarily block the plan as originally detailed in a memo by the Office of Management and Budget. The White House later rescinded that OMB memo, but stated that its review of federal funding remained in effect…

“For now, the order blocks any suspension of federal dollars to the 22 states that were party to the suit — as well as the District of Columbia….”

Trump Kills ISIS Terrorists in Somalia

The Sun wrote on February 1, 2025:

“Donald Trump has killed ‘many’ ISIS terrorists with pinpoint airstrikes in Somalia… Trump wrote a powerful message on Truth Social saying: ‘This morning I ordered precision Military air strikes on the Senior ISIS Attack Planner and other terrorists he recruited and led in Somalia. These killers, who we found hiding in caves, threatened the United States and our Allies. The strikes destroyed the caves they live in, and killed many terrorists without, in any way, harming civilians.’

“He added that the US military has spent years gathering intelligence on these ISIS hideouts but former President Joe Biden ‘and his cronies wouldn’t act quickly enough to get the job done’. Trump ended his post by saying to anyone who attacks the US: ‘We will find you, and we will kill you!’…

“Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth confirmed he conducted the coordinated strikes alongside Trump and the Federal Government of Somalia… In Somalia alone, there are estimated to be hundreds of IS fighters…  In 2023, Biden ordered a special forces operation in northern Somalia which eliminated a senior ISIS commander and 10 other militants… Three more IS operatives were taken out last May in another US airstrike…”

Iran Is Secretly Creating Long-Range Nuclear Weapons

Daily Mail wrote on January 31:

“Iran has allegedly been covertly creating nuclear weapons with a 1,800-mile radius that could reach Europe based on designs created by North Korea… [Allegedly,] two sites have been disguised as communication satellite launch facilities, but are being utilised to expedite the manufacture of the missiles. It is believed they are controlled by Iran’s nuclear weapons division…

“According to the Telegraph, there have been three successful rocket launches thus far, with test for the more advanced Ghaem-105 rocket set to happen over the next few months. Past tests were carried out in the guise of being satellite launches in a bid to secretly carry out the trial… Image taken by Google Earth show a concrete platform used in the experiments, with buildings nearby thought to be used for related research…”

Iran should clearly not be underestimated. They will still have a role to play in coming events.

USA Today wrote on February 4:

“Trump signed a presidential memorandum Tuesday authorizing more aggressive measures toward Iran.

“He also threatened ‘total obliteration’ of the country if there is another attempt on his life by Tehran.”

Trump: US Will Take Over Gaza

Breitbart wrote on February 4:

“President Donald Trump said Tuesday that the U.S. would take over Gaza and remove debris, tunnels, and explosives left there by Hamas after the war with Israel, adding that he saw America taking a ‘long-term ownership position.’ Trump said: ‘The US will take over the Gaza Strip, and we will do a job with it too. We’ll love it and be responsible for dismantling all of the dangerous bombs and other weapons on the site… and get rid of the destroyed buildings [and] create an economic development that will supply unlimited numbers of jobs and housing.’

“The surprise announcement came as the president spoke alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the first foreign leader to visit Trump since his Inauguration last month. Trump had previously said that he would like to see most, or all, of the Palestinian population of Gaza moved to another Arab or Muslim country. The idea of actually taking over Gaza, and establishing a U.S. presence, was both unexpected and completely new. Trump added that the U.S. would develop Gaza economically, sending troops if necessary and making investments.

“He called the potential of Gaza ‘unbelieveable,’ but said that Palestinian control of Gaza ‘will never work.’…

“A reporter asked Trump what right the U.S. had to take over Gaza… Trump did not reply directly but said that American control of Gaza would increase ‘stability’ in the region as the various nations pursued peace together. Netanyahu, who had never publicly advocated for anything like what Trump proposed, said that the idea was ‘something that could change history’ and that it was ‘worth considering.’

“It is considered taboo, even in Israel, to advocate for the ‘transfer’ of Palestinians from Gaza or from Judea and Samaria (also known as the West Bank).

“Trump has previously proposed buying Greenland, so he is not averse to the idea of America taking over territory abroad. However, the idea of taking over war-torn Gaza is completely unique and quite possibly revolutionary.”

Israel’s far-right politicians responded with delight and approval.

Newsmax wrote on February 6:

“President Donald Trump said on Thursday that Israel would turn the Gaza Strip over to the United States after the fighting ends and that no U.S. soldiers would be needed there… ‘The Palestinians … would have already been resettled in far safer and more beautiful communities, with new and modern homes, in the region,’ Trump said in a Truth Social post… ‘No soldiers by the U.S. would be needed!’”

As we explain in our new StandingWatch program, “Trump—the Man of Destiny?”, that conclusion would be doubtful.

The Ron Paul Institute added on February 5:

“Trump also insisted that the Palestinians will be relocated to a third country (unspecified) and will not have a right to return. This was scripted. You can see Trump is reading from a note card.”

The Drudge Report linked on February 5 in this context to an article by the Times of Israel from November 14, 2024, stating that “President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for secretary of defense Pete Hegseth suggested that a temple could be re-established on the Temple Mount in a resurfaced speech he gave in 2018 at the Arutz Sheva conference in Jerusalem… He also rejected the two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.”

We had reported on this in a previous Update.

The international reaction to Trump’s statement on Gaza was predictable. The Guardian reported on February 5:

“Trump’s declaration US will ‘take over’ Gaza Strip sparks global condemnation. UK, Germany, China, Iran, Turkey and Saudi Arabia speak against announcement described as ethnic cleansing by human rights groups.”

JTA added on February 5:

“Saudi Arabia responded quickly: No, it had not yielded on demanding the establishment of an independent Palestinian state, with east Jerusalem as its capital, as a condition of normalization with Israel… ‘The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia emphasizes that this unwavering position is non-negotiable and not subject to compromises,’ the statement said. Saudi Arabia also noted that it would object to any efforts to displace Palestinians, an idea Trump has repeatedly insisted on in recent days.

“The firm statement illustrates the gap between Saudi Arabia and Trump…”

Belgium’s New Government

Deutsche Welle wrote on February 1:

“Political parties in Belgium struck a deal on Friday to form a broad coalition government. The announcement concluded months of talks that followed federal elections in June last year. The country’s new prime minister is set to be the right-wing New Flemish Alliance (N-VA) leader Bart De Wever, who secured victory in the June polls.

“De Wever will lead a five-party coalition which includes the Christian Democrats, the liberal Reformist Movement and the Flemish Social Democrats. Together, they hold an 81-seat majority in Belgium’s 150-seat parliament. The far-right Vlaams Belang (Flemish Interest) party was excluded from the government talks, despite the anti-immigration party having made the largest gains in the June 2024 election. Political parties consistently exclude Vlaams Belang due to its anti-immigrant and anti-EU stance as well as its aim to split up the country.

“Belgium’s Royal Palace released a statement saying that De Wever had reported the agreement of the future coalition to the king… This will be the first time Belgium will have a nationalist in the position of prime minister…”

The same approach the established parties in Germany take toward the right-wing AfD. This approach will not succeed.

“Deal” Between China and the Philippines?

The Associated Press wrote on January 30:

“Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. offered on Thursday to remove a U.S. missile system from the Philippines if China halts what he called its ‘aggressive and coercive behavior’ in the disputed South China Sea.

“The U.S. Army installed the Typhon mid-range missile system in the northern Philippines in April last year to support what the longtime treaty allies described as training for joint combat readiness. China has repeatedly demanded that the Philippines remove the missile system…

“Asked by reporters about China’s criticism of the missile system, Marcos said he did not understand the Chinese position because the Philippines does not comment on China’s missile systems which ‘are a thousand times more powerful than what we have.’ ‘Let’s make a deal with China: Stop claiming our territory, stop harassing our fishermen and let them have a living, stop ramming our boats, stop water cannoning our people, stop firing lasers at us and stop your aggressive and coercive behavior, and we’ll return the typhoon missiles,’ Marcos told reporters in central Cebu province…

“The U.S. Army’s mobile Typhon missile system, which consists of a launcher and at least 16 Standard Missile-6 and Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles, was repositioned about two weeks ago from the northern Philippines to a strategic area nearer the capital, Manila, in consultation with Philippine defense officials, a senior Philippine official told The Associated Press… The Philippine official… said the U.S. missile system is now nearer an area where Chinese and Philippine coast guard and navy forces have been involved in increasingly tense faceoffs in the South China Sea.

“The U.S. and the Philippines have repeatedly condemned China’s increasingly assertive actions to press its territorial claims in the South China Sea, where hostilities have flared over the past two years with repeated clashes between Chinese and Philippine coast guard forces and accompanying vessels. Aside from China and the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan also have overlapping claims in the busy waterway, a key shipping route which is also believed to be sitting atop large undersea deposits of gas and oil.”

Maybe Trump will try next, unsuccessfully, to get that waterway or sea gate? The role of the Philippines in upcoming prophetic developments will be interesting to observe.

The Fight Against Merz

Focus wrote on February 1:

“The SPD and the Greens [part of the current German governmentdon’t have the slightest chance of governing in a red-green two-party coalition. But the red-green coalition easily manages to significantly influence the public discussion with the slogan ‘Fight against the right’. Anyone who presents themselves as an ‘anti-fascist’ has most of the media behind them… And sometimes the streets – demonstrating, protesting, sometimes violent.

“With the ‘Influx Limitation Act’ [proposed by Merz], Merz gave the Red-Green Party (under Scholz and Habeck) the choice of either agreeing or letting the AfD tip the scales. Much of what was in the law had already been approved by the Prime Ministers of the SPD, the Greens and the Union (CDU). The SPD and the Greens could have agreed without betraying their principles. The SPD and the Greens were aware that their ‘no’ would once again increase the status of Weidel, Höcke & Co. (of the AfD). Despite all the pathetic statements, that didn’t deter them, on the contrary…

“It is revealing that the SPD and the Greens have hardly dealt with the content of the CDU applications for days. They have managed to focus the public discussion on the CDU’s supposedly collapsed firewall against the AfD [the idea that no one would enter into a collation with the AfD]. That is much easier than explaining why the Scholz/Habeck government of all people has driven the number of AfD supporters to unimagined heights with their policies.

“But apparently Merz and the CDU completely underestimated the wave of hatred they would face if they accepted the AfD’s approval in order to achieve their goal. What followed was worse than even pessimists had feared.

“Merz had hardly taken into account the ‘blood attack’ that his old opponent Angela Merkel was about to make… as no former chancellor had ever done against a potential successor – especially not against one from his own party. Merkel apparently cannot cope with the fact that the population has now recognized how negligent her refugee policy was. And that her own party has long since moved away from it. Above all, Merkel probably wants to prevent her eternal opponent Merz from sitting in her former chancellor’s office one day. She would rather help the united left to put down the party’s ‘friend’… Merz also completely underestimated the force with which most media – especially ARD and ZDF – would join in the theatrical indignation of the united left…

“The SPD knows that its chancellor [Olaf Scholz] has poorer poll ratings than any of his predecessors. She is aware that she cannot score points with voters either with her economic policy record or with her migration policy. The ‘fight against the right’ is their last cartridge…

“It is foreseeable that Friedrich Merz will no longer be able to appear anywhere until election day [February 23, 2025] without the united left trying to block access… All over the country, CDU offices have already been blocked or occupied, and employees have been threatened. In many places, the CDU has canceled the street election campaign this weekend. With so much hatred and agitation, it is too dangerous in some places to identify yourself as a CDU supporter...”

Assuming that the CDU under Merz will still win the election and will form some kind of an unstable coalition, the new government will turn out to be the same debacle which the government under Scholz has been. It won’t survive either.

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News

US Pause of Foreign Aids For 90 Days

Reuters reported on January 24:

“The U.S. State Department issued a ‘stop-work’ order [for 90 days] on Friday for all existing foreign assistance and paused new aid, according to a cable seen by Reuters, after President Donald Trump ordered a pause to review if aid allocation was aligned with his foreign policy. The cable, drafted by the Department’s foreign assistance office and approved by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, said waivers have been issued for military financing for Israel and Egypt. No other countries were mentioned in the cable…

“The State Department cable said effective immediately, senior officials ‘shall ensure that, to the maximum extent permitted by law, no new obligations shall be made for foreign assistance’ until Rubio has made a decision after a review. It says that for existing foreign assistance awards stop-work orders shall be issued immediately until reviewed by Rubio…”

Subsequently, the Pentagon clarified: “Trump’s executive order freezing foreign aid applies only to development programs, not security assistance to Ukraine.” However, it has also been reported that while Trump’s order does not curtail security assistance (i.e., weapons, vehicles and ammunition) already in the pipeline, it does freeze USAID projects for the Ukraine, including support for schools and maternal care and the vaccination of children.

Court Blocks Trump

CNBC reported on January 28:

 “A federal judge paused until next week a Trump administration order that would have frozen the issuance of existing federal grants and loans until agencies vetted them. Judge Loren AliKhan’s ruling Tuesday during a hearing conducted on Zoom came just minutes before the freezing order was set to take effect at 5 p.m. ET. At stake are funds potentially worth trillions of dollars.

“AliKhan [a Biden appointee] said her administrative stay would expire at 5 p.m. ET Monday unless she decides to grant a temporary restraining order as requested by plaintiffs who filed a lawsuit earlier in the day challenging the Trump administration’s action. The judge scheduled a hearing for Monday morning for arguments on the requested restraining order in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C…. AliKhan’s stay only affects the disbursement of government funds that already have been authorized, not money that was being sought.”

Spending Nothing on NATO?

Newsmax wrote on January 23:

“President Donald Trump on Thursday said he was not sure the United States should be spending anything on NATO, telling reporters the U.S. was protecting NATO members, but they were ‘not protecting us.’…

“Trump has said members of the military alliance should spend 5% of their gross domestic product on defense — a huge increase from the current 2% goal and a level that no NATO country, including the United States, currently achieves.”

NATO might very well be on its way out.

Trump for a Third Term?

The New York Post wrote on January 24:

“A congressman is pushing for a law change that would allow President Trump to run for a third term… Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) proposed an amendment Thursday that would allow presidents three terms in office — as long as they did not serve two consecutive four-year stints.

“That would allow a third term for Trump — whose two were interrupted by Joe Biden — but not for Obama, Clinton or George W. Bush, who each served two consecutive terms…

“The 22nd Amendment — passed by Congress in 1947 after Franklin Delano Roosevelt won four terms in office — currently bars Trump and all two-term holders of the Oval Office from running for a third term.”

Even IF the 22nd Amendment bars Trump from “running a third time,” even though he did not serve two consecutive terms, there are other ways than amending the Constitution to serve a third time.

For instance, the 22nd Amendment only requires that someone not be elected to the Presidency more than twice. Someone who was elected to two terms is still eligible to be Vice President and to rise to the Presidency upon the death, resignation or removal of the President.

Then, another way to be President is to be “chosen” President by the House of Representatives in those unusual situations where no candidate for President obtains a majority of the electoral college.

In Las Vegas on January 25, Trump toyed with the idea of serving a third time, which received thunderous applause from his supporters, but he then dismissed the idea as fake news. Is it?

Newsmax added on January 27:

“President Donald Trump once again hinted at the idea of serving a third term, saying he was “not 100% sure” he was barred from doing so under the Constitution, which forbids it.

“Trump has repeatedly alluded to the possibility that he might go beyond the current two-term limit for presidents — but while he often strikes a light-hearted tone the remarks remain provocative….

“In November, in another speech to House Republicans shortly after his election win, Trump said: ‘I suspect I won’t be running again unless you say, “He’s good, we got to figure something else.”’”

The Deportation Nightmare

Breitbart wrote on January 26:

“Governor JB Pritzker (D-IL) Sunday on CNN’s ‘State of the Union’ warned the Trump administration that his local law enforcement ‘will stand up for those law-abiding, undocumented people’ facing deportation…. Pritzker said, ‘… when we’re talking about violent criminals who have been convicted and who are undocumented, we don’t want them in our state. We want them out of the country. We hope they do get deported. And if that’s who they’re picking up, we’re all for it. They show up with a warrant, and we’re going to hand over people who are in our prisons or in our jails who fit that description.

“‘Now, what they’re also doing, though, and it’s quite disturbing, is they’re going after people who are law-abiding, who are holding down jobs, who have families here who may have been here for a decade or two decades, and they’re often our neighbors and our friends… We also have a law on the books in Illinois that says that our local law enforcement will stand up for those law-abiding, undocumented people in our state who are doing the right thing. And we’re not going to help federal officials just drag them away because somebody pointed at them and said, oh, that person’s brown or that person’s not from here. Check it out. Maybe they’re undocumented.’”

Sadly, that is how many Jews were arrested in Nazi Germany… due to the denunciation of others.

ICE Raids LA

The New York Post wrote on January 26:

“Details of the LA raids were scarce as of Saturday afternoon, but sources said migrants rounded up there were being held in ICE detention centers in California pending deportation. Officials are expecting the sites to fill up quickly, and the feds are scouting for more space to hold migrants, the sources said…

“Executive orders issued by Trump dramatically loosened restrictions on how immigration officers can conduct deportation raids, removing bans for searching courthouses, churches and other ‘sensitive’ sites that illegal migrants have historically holed up in to be shielded from federal authorities. The White House will be using military planes every day to help carry out what Trump and ‘border czar’ Tom Homan have vowed will be the largest deportation operation in U.S. history…”

Going After Nonviolent Illegal Aliens

Fox News wrote on January 26:

“Border Czar Tom Homan warned that daily deportation numbers are set to rise in the coming weeks as President Trump’s administration begins to expand its operations. The border chief says the administration is currently only targeting violent illegal aliens, but that will soon change… ‘If you’re in the country illegally, you’re on the table… every time you enter this country illegally, you violated a crime under Title Eight, the United States Code 1325, it’s a crime,’ Homan [said]… ‘Here’s what’s going to happen. We’ll find the bad guy, but when we find him, he’s going to be with others, others that may not be a criminal priority. But guess what? If they’re in the United States illegally, they’re going to be arrested, too.’”

To clarify, US Code 1325 is a misdemeanor, not a felony. Violations are ruled upon by civil courts, not criminal courts. Also, being present in the USA without legal documentation is in itself not a federal crime.

The New York Post added that Homan also said that deportations will continue every day and culminate in millions of illegal migrants being jettisoned from the US, and that the border is closed.

This whole mess will quickly get out of control, and many will needlessly suffer in the process.

Fate of 90,000 IRS Agents?

Daily Mail wrote on January 26:

“Donald Trump has revealed what could be the fate of nearly 90,000 newly hired Internal Revenue Service (IRS) staff, suggesting he might ‘move them to the border’.  Hours after he was handed over the presidency, the Republican leader signed an executive order to stop [indefinitely] the hiring of all federal civilian employees until ‘his Administration can determine that it is in the national interest to do so’.  Apart from the IRS, the decision is temporary [for 90 days] for all other federal offices….

“’They hired – were trying to hire 88,000 new workers to go with you, and we’re in the process of developing a plan to either terminate all of them or maybe we move them to the border,’ the President said [in Las Vegas on January 25]…

‘Instead of taxing our citizens to enrich other countries, we will tariff and tax foreign countries to enrich our citizens.’ Trump went on: ‘For this purpose, we are establishing the External Revenue Service to collect all tariffs, duties and revenues,’  Trump said during his speech at the Capitol on Monday.”

“He also warned world leaders they could face crippling economic sanctions if they don’t start manufacturing in America in a blistering speech to the World Economic Forum on January 23. The president said nations ‘will pay’ if they opt against doing business in the United States… He also offered an incentive of lower taxes and rates to nations that choose to move more of their business…”

A better way would be to get rid of the IRS completely. The fear is that with the removal of IRS employees, the IRS will not do their job at all, when it applies, for instance, to the refund of taxes—something in which the IRS is already terribly lacking and delinquent in far too many cases. And it is next to impossible to reach a live person, let alone getting an appointment.

US Restricts Access to Chips for AI

swissinfo.ch wrote on January 26:

“The US recently changed the rules for the export of products related to artificial intelligence. Only countries that are considered allies are now allowed to access these computer chips. And Switzerland is not one of them.

“Only 18 countries are considered trustworthy allies in the USA, including France, Germany and Japan. According to Washington, these nations are worthy of unrestricted access to these very powerful computer chips, which are manufactured exclusively by US companies.

“This new regulation will come into force in four months. After that, Switzerland will still be able to import these chips, but will be subject to a limited quota in the coming years… It is not entirely clear why Switzerland is not one of the allied countries… Nevertheless, it seems clear that the main aim of this regulation is to deny rival countries, especially China, access to this cutting-edge technology. The US is not only trying to curb exports, but also to prevent Chinese companies from circumventing the restrictions by setting up subsidiaries abroad.”

Getting Rid of FEMA?

Las Vegas Sun wrote on January 23:

“President Donald Trump said he was considering ‘getting rid of’ the Federal Emergency Management Agency… Instead of having federal financial assistance flow through FEMA, [he] said Washington could provide money directly to the states

“‘FEMA has been a very big disappointment,’ [he] said. ‘It’s very bureaucratic. And it’s very slow.’”

The problem is, what if the states— such as California—do not use the money wisely? Supervising committees can only go so far.

The California Fire Paradox

Breitbart wrote on January 26:

“Residents of the Pacific Palisades flocked home on Saturday after President Donald Trump’s visit the day before, with many gaining access to their property for the first time since the Palisades Fire more than two weeks ago. Trump met with residents and local officials on Friday, holding a roundtable discussion at the local fire station in which he allowed those affected by the fires to raise their concerns for the first time.  During the meeting, local residents raised concerns that they had been told it would take 18 months to clear their lots of debris, and that local permitting processes would stop them from rebuilding. In addition, most of the affected residents had been prohibited from even visiting the ruins of their homes. Trump took the residents’ side against the city, and when Mayor Karen Bass pushed back, he insisted that they be able to access their property immediately. Bass said they could go within a week. ‘A week is a long time,’ President Trump said, saying residents should be able to go immediately.

“The next day, residents rushed to the assembly point in nearby Santa Monica Parking Lot #3, where police escorts had been taking caravans of residents to the Highlands, one of the areas of the Pacific Palisades that had not been as badly affected as the rest of the town. They insisted on being taken to other neighborhoods… with many insisting that President Trump had promised them access. While some were turned away, some persisted and were able to visit their lots — at least for a short period of time… Some residents reported continued denials by National Guard soldiers and police. One posted on Instagram: ‘They didn’t let us in but they also said they wouldn’t arrest us if we went around them. So we went.’… Many expressed a commitment to rebuild, and hope that President Trump’s pressure on Los Angeles and California will allow them to do so.”

Trump also declared that he will waive any federal permits and urged Mayor Bass to do the same in regard to the state, so that rebuilding could start immediately.

Did the Military Take Over California?

Newsmax wrote on January 28:

“President Donald Trump declared on social media that the military has entered California and ‘turned on the water’ from the Pacific Northwest… ‘The United States Military just entered the Great State of California and, under Emergency Powers, TURNED ON THE WATER flowing abundantly from the Pacific Northwest, and beyond,’ Trump wrote…  Monday night…

“The California Department of Water Resources, however, responded… that the ‘military did not enter California… The federal government restarted federal water pumps after they were offline for maintenance for three days,” the agency said. “State water supplies in Southern California remain plentiful.’…

“Trump has accused Gov. Gavin Newsom of holding back water supplies in California, thus impeding the state’s response to the wildfires in Los Angeles. Last Friday, he said he wants to place conditions on disaster aid, calling for tightening voter requirements while increasing water supplies from Northern California…

“Newsom and other state officials deny Trump’s claims and say there is plenty of water in Southern California… ‘Reservoirs in California are at or above average storage levels for this time of year, thanks in part to years of proactive water management.’… Trump in his order directed the federal Bureau of Reclamation to make sure that California agencies ‘do not interfere’ with the water supply….”

It is a well-known fact that California did NOT have enough water to fight the fires. One major reservoir was empty and could not be used.

Pete Hegseth New Defense Secretary

Fox News wrote on January 24:

“The Senate voted to confirm… Pete Hegseth, as defense secretary on Friday night after a high-tempered battle to sway lawmakers in his favor that was almost derailed by accusations about his behavior. 

“The final vote came down to the wire: three Republicans opposed, making for a 50 to 50 vote. Vice President JD Vance was needed to break the tie in the upper chamber, putting the final tally at 51-50… All Democrats opposed the confirmation, a far cry from an earlier vote this week, when Secretary of State Marco Rubio was confirmed unanimously, 99-0.” 

More Drone Sightings… and Still No Explanation

Daily Mail wrote on January 24:

“A New Jersey Mayor has shared new footage of ‘glowing orbs transforming into drones’ over Long Island, adding more intrigue to this ongoing mystery. Michael Melham, the Mayor of Belleville,… shared the bizarre footage on X, saying the clips ‘appears to show glowing orbs turning into drones. Verified not to be planes via flight tracker. They hover. Glow. Then move.’…

“New Jersey still appears to be the epicenter of drone reports following the first sightings in November, when eyewitnesses reported ‘car-sized drones’ flying above a military base and President Donald Trump’s golf course.  But since then, hundreds of other reports have surfaced across the Northeast and even from several southern states, including Virginia, Kentucky and the Carolinas…

“A drone ban was issued from December 18 to January 17, during which Enigma labs said the average number of reported sightings dropped by 43 percent. Now, new data shows 36 sightings were logged the week of January 1, and nearly half were spotted in New Jersey. Trump has yet to release the drone report he promised, and many Americans await new information about the alarming phenomenon they believe they have been experiencing.”

The New York Post wrote on January 25:

“A brief lull in activity that coincided with flight restrictions imposed by the feds has ended, now that the Federal Aviation Administration lifted the ban. And the mysterious unmanned aircraft aren’t just plaguing the Big Apple and the Garden State. ‘We’ve received over 100 reports in the past three weeks that mention drones across the US,’ Enigma Labs spokesperson Christine Kim said…

“New Jersey remains a hotbed of drone activity, Kim claimed. The New York-based company’s ‘unidentified anomalous phenomena’…  received a total of 22,000 sightings in 2024, with most concentrated in the Northeast… Enigma Labs relies on user-submitted information and began tracking sightings in late November… Since then, it’s received 650 reports of drone sightings in the US, with 154 coming in January alone

“Over 50% of reports to Enigma described the objects as ‘hovering’ or staying airborne for extended periods of time, while 25% indicated objects were observed moving in swarms of five or more.”

Update on Drones Flying Over New Jersey

Fox News wrote on January 28:

“The White House on Tuesday revealed that some of the drones seen flying over New Jersey and other parts of the country in November were authorized to be flown by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)… for research and various other reasons… In addition to those authorized by the FAA, other drones flown by hobbyists were sighted, and that number increased as curiosity about the phenomenon grew, the White House said [adding that This was not the enemy.’].”

This sounds extremely untrue. The U.S. Department of Defense had published the following article on its website on December 14, 2024:

“Right now, the FBI, DHS, FAA and DOD have been unable to determine who is responsible for flying the drones, and there’s no indication that there are adversary nations involved. ‘To date, we have no intelligence or observations that would indicate that they were aligned with a foreign actor or that they had malicious intent,’ the spokesperson said. ‘But … we don’t know. We have not been able to locate or identify the operators or the points of origin.’”

Trump Explanation Raises Even More Questions

The New York Post added on January 28:

“The explanation did not clarify what research was being performed — in many cases near military bases — or detail what ‘other reasons’ were at play. Some leading politicians have been skeptical of the official explanation that the drones were innocent. Then-House Foreign Affairs Committee chairman Mike McCaul (R-Texas) said last month that he believed many of the aircraft were ‘spy drones’ from China. ‘My judgment based on my experience is that those that are over our military sites are adversarial and most likely are coming from the People’s Republic of China,’ McCaul said at the time. ‘We’re not getting answers and I think it’s because our government does not know who is behind them and that is very disturbing to me.’”

IF the FAA had authorized the drones for research and other reasons, it certainly would have known this. So either they lied then, or they are lying now. The question is, what is REALLY behind those drones? Please view our StandingWatch program, titled, “The DRONES! No Danger? Are You Kidding?”

Taking Back the Panama Canal?

The New York Post wrote on January 28:

“A top Senate Republican accused Panama Tuesday of violating the treaty giving the Central American nation control over the vital Panama Canal shipping lane — saying the country had waved through illicit transfers of crude oil by Iran and exposed itself to dangerous Chinese influence…. ‘Panama has emerged as a bad actor,’ charged Senate Commerce, Science and Technology Chairman Ted Cruz (R-Texas).

“‘Panama has for years flagged dozens of vessels in the Iranian ghost fleet, which brought Iran tens of billions of dollars in oil profits to fund terror across the world. And Chinese companies have won contracts, often without fair competition… China often engages in debt-trap diplomacy to enable economic and political coercion in Panama… It also seems to have exploited simple corruption.’

“Cruz also explained that Panama’s ‘high fees for canal transit disproportionately affect Americans, because US cargo accounts for nearly three-quarters of Canal transits,’ while US Navy vessels ‘pay additional fees that apply only to warships.’…

“Tuesday’s hearing kicked off formal efforts to investigate whether Panama is in violation of the 1997 Panama Canal Treaty and Neutrality Treaty which could allow the US to retake the canal zone by force…”

View our StandingWatch program, titled, “Will the USA Take the Panama Canal Back?” 

Elon Musk’s Ongoing Support for the AfD and German Values

Daily Mail wrote on January 26:

“Elon Musk has backed Germany’s… AfD (Alternative fuer Deutschland) party at its latest rally… The billionaire made a surprise appearance during the AfD’s election campaign event in Halle in eastern Germany on Saturday, voicing his support for the second time in as many weeks. 

“’It’s good to be proud of German culture, German values, and not to lose that in some sort of multiculturalism that dilutes everything,’ Musk, via video link, told the hall of 4,500 people alongside party leader Alice Weidel… he said ‘children should not be guilty of the sins of their parents, let alone their great grandparents,’ apparently referring to Germany’s Nazi past. ‘There is too much focus on past guilt, and we need to move beyond that,’ he said…

“Musk spoke in favour of voting for the far right party, saying: ‘I’m very excited for the AfD, I think you’re really the best hope for Germany fight for a great future for Germany,’ he told onlookers. Weidel thanked him, said the Republicans were making America great again, and called on her supporters to make Germany great again.”

AFP added on January 25:

“‘The German people are really an ancient nation which goes back thousands of years,’ he said in Saturday’s address. ‘I even read Julius Caesar was very impressed (by) the German tribes,’ he said…  He said the AfD wanted ‘more self-determination for Germany and for the countries in Europe and less from Brussels’, a reference to European Union authorities…

Like Trump, the AfD opposes immigration, denies climate change, rails against gender politics and has declared war on a political establishment and mainstream media it condemns as censorious.”

Musk also stated that he does not believe he is exaggerating when saying that the future of civilization could be dependent on the German election in February (compare Bild Online, dated January 25). 

More Hostages and Prisoners Released

npr wrote on January 24:

“Hamas has identified four female Israeli soldiers [who were] released on Saturday…  All of them were taken hostage on Oct. 7, 2023, from the Nahal Oz army base on Israel’s border with Gaza… After they are handed over, Israel is expected to free 200 Palestinian or so prisoners and detainees, based on a calculation stipulated in the agreement that 50 detainees should be released for each female soldier.

“If all goes according to plan this weekend, Hamas will have freed seven of the 33 hostages slated for release in the first six-week phase of the ceasefire agreement. Not all of them are believed to be alive. In exchange, Israel will have so far released more than 2,000 Palestinian detainees [some of them have been convicted of murder].”

Cleaning Out Gaza Population?

Financial Times wrote on January 26:

“Donald Trump has urged Egypt and Jordan to take in most of the population of Gaza, saying it was time to ‘clean out’ the territory in comments that are likely to outrage Palestinians and Arabs across the region… ‘You’re talking about a million and half people, and we just clean out that whole thing.’ Trump’s proposal would upend decades of US policy promoting the two-state solution based on the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel, in Gaza and parts of the occupied West Bank.

“Trump said he has already discussed his proposal to relocate Gaza’s population with King Abdullah of Jordan on Saturday and will bring it up on Sunday in a phone call with Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, Egypt’s president. With the ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas entering its second week, Trump said Gaza was ‘literally a demolition site, almost everything is demolished and people are dying there so I’d rather get involved with some of the Arab nations and build housing at a different location where they can maybe live in peace for a change.’…

“Amman and Cairo have since the start of the war in October 2023 repeatedly rejected any transfer of Palestinians to their territories, saying it would amount to the ‘liquidation of the Palestinian cause’ at the expense of Israel’s neighbours. Sisi has said previously that taking in Gazans would threaten Egypt’s peace agreement with Israel because of the risk that some of them would resume fighting the Jewish state from within Egypt’s borders…

“The two countries have weak economies and need US support but their leaders would not want to be seen to be complicit in what Arab public opinion would consider a second ‘Nakba’ or catastrophe — the exodus to neighbouring countries of hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees in 1948 when the state of Israel was founded…

“Trump’s Gaza proposal nonetheless delighted leaders of Israel’s far-right… Itamar Ben-Gvir, the former Israeli national security minister who resigned in protest last week over the Gaza ceasefire deal, ‘praised’ Trump for floating the idea. Trump also confirmed that the Pentagon had lifted a hold on the delivery 2,000-pound bombs to Israel imposed by the Biden administration. ‘We released them today and they’ll have them,’ he said. ‘They paid for them and they have been waiting for them for a long time.’

“The ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas was already under strain despite the successful release on Saturday of four female Israeli soldiers from captivity in Gaza and 200 Palestinian prisoners from Israeli jails. Israeli officials said over the weekend that Hamas had violated the US-brokered accord after it failed to release the last civilian woman hostage still believed to be alive — Arbel Yehud — before the soldiers… Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said that until the matter was ‘put in order’ it would not allow hundreds of thousands of displaced Palestinians to return to northern Gaza, as called for in the deal. Israel’s ceasefire with Lebanon also appeared in danger, with Israel making it clear late last week that it would not meet the two month deadline for the withdrawal of its forces from southern Lebanon on Sunday.”

Palestinians Return to Gaza

CNN reported on January 27:

“More than 300,000 displaced Palestinians have returned to the northern Gaza Strip [on Monday] since Israel reopened the corridor …

“Gaza City, where most of the people making this journey on Monday had been living before the war, is among the most destroyed areas in the strip. There are no fully functioning hospitals or schools in the area and access to water, power and basic supplies is extremely limited, despite aid flows into Gaza increasing since the ceasefire came into effect.

“Seen from above, the crowds on Monday resembled a huge, slow moving wave making its way up Gaza’s coast, then turning inland. Most, including children, injured people and the elderly, were traveling on foot, carrying the little they have left on their backs. Most have spent many months exiled in makeshift refugee camps after Israeli forces ordered large-scale evacuations.

“The Israeli military said residents could return on foot along the Al Rasheed coastal road, while vehicle traffic can pass via the inland Salah al-Din road after inspection…

“Israel’s far-right former national security minister, Itamar Ben Gvir, who quit in protest over the ceasefire and hostage release deal, claimed the return of Palestinians to northern Gaza was a ‘total surrender.’”

Putin and Zelensky Ready to Negotiate?

Daily Mail wrote on January 24:

“Vladimir Putin today declared that the war in Ukraine could have been averted had Donald Trump not been ‘robbed of the election’ in 2020. Describing his armed forces’ full-scale invasion of their neighbour in February 2022 as a ‘crisis’, Putin told state media the horrific bloodshed that has blighted eastern Europe for almost three years would not have happened under a Trump presidency… His comments came as part of a wide-ranging interview in which the Kremlin chief heaped praise on the newly inaugurated US president, labelling Trump ‘smart and pragmatic’ while also signalling a willingness to approach the negotiating table over Ukraine…

“Kyiv was unsurprisingly quick to respond, with President Volodymyr Zelensky’s office issuing a tight-lipped statement that there could be no peace talks between Putin and Trump without the participation of European representatives… On Wednesday, Trump warned his Russian counterpart that he would face taxes, tariffs and sanctions if Russia did not sign up to a deal to end the war in Ukraine. The US president has previously warned that he could intensify the supply of arms to Ukraine if Moscow does not come to the negotiating table… But Trump’s advisers have also hinted the steady stream of Western military aid to Ukraine could be shut off if Kyiv refuses to countenance a deal. In a somewhat inflammatory statement about the Ukrainian leader, Trump recently said Zelensky was ‘no angel’ and insisted he ‘shouldn’t have allowed this war to happen’…

“Many argue that Russia’s upper hand on the battlefield and its efforts to build stronger economic and political ties with other powers in the face of the West’s sanctions mean that Kremlin is coming to the negotiating table with a strong hand of cards.”

Denmark in Crisis Mode

The Telegraph wrote on January 24:

“Denmark is in ‘crisis mode’ after Donald Trump made a direct play for Greenland in a ‘horrendous’ phone call with the country’s prime minister. The US president spoke to Mette Frederiksen, the Danish premier, for 45 minutes last week and made clear he wanted to place Greenland under American control… Ms Frederiksen told him in their call last week that despite his ‘big interest’, Greenland was not for sale, the Financial Times reported. Mr Trump then became ‘aggressive’, according to the newspaper, and threatened to impose tariffs on Denmark unless Greenland was sold to the US…

“The call came after Mr Trump refused to rule out using military force to take Greenland in a press conference on Jan 7, arguing that it was a matter of ‘national security’ that the US gained an Arctic base… Mr Trump’s refusal to rule out a full-scale invasion of Greenland has raised questions about the Nato alliance, of which both Denmark and the US are members. The alliance’s Article 5 collective defence agreement states that a military attack on one member would result in other members declaring war on the aggressor. It is not clear what would happen if one Nato member attacked another.”

UK’s Right of First Refusal

Daily Mail wrote on January 26:

“President Donald Trump’s bid to acquire Greenland could be foiled by Sir Keir Starmer if Britain were to act on an agreement made over 100 years ago… even if the Danes did agree to sell Greenland, they would have to offer the UK first refusal, per the terms of an agreement crafted in 1917 – when the US first attempted to acquire the island… The agreement was crafted when US President Woodrow Wilson purchased the US Virgin Islands from Denmark for $25 million.

“He was urged to buy Greenland, but Copenhagen refused and would only move forward with the deal if America signed a letter acknowledging Greenland ‘is and will forever be Danish’… The UK, at the same time, insisted that it have first right of refusal if the island were to ever be sold, citing the close proximity to  Canada, which was then a British dominion. Despite this agreement, experts say the UK Government is unlikely to take advantage of the century-old deal…”

Denmark Increases Military for Greenland

Daily Mail wrote on January 27:

“The European Union  is seeking to beef up its military presence in Greenland just one week after President Donald Trump took office and threatened to seize the vast land mass…

“While the Scandinavian country is responsible for Greenland’s security and defense, Copenhagen has limited military capabilities on its island territory…

“Gen. Robert Brieger of Austria, the top EU military official, has said the group should deploy troops to Greenland… Brieger… wants the bloc to send in troops to beef up presence amid concerns that Trump will take swift action to gain control of the autonomous Danish region. The general, however, said the move is meant to send a ‘strong signal’ and serve as a deterrent against Russian and Chinese activity in the strategic location…

“Last year Denmark allocated $26 billion – when converted to USD – for its military spending. And now it wants to use more than $2 billion of that to be allocated to the Arctic…”

Europe Unites Against Trump

MSN wrote on January 27:

“The European Union (EU) renewed sanctions against Russia and agreed on a road map to lift some of those imposed on Syria. At an EU foreign ministers meeting on Monday, leaders also called for a unified approach to deal with US President Donald Trump and what analysts refer to as his ‘divide and rule policy.’

“The EU’s top diplomat Kaja Kallas said as the US undertook a ‘transactional’ foreign policy, Europe needed to ‘close ranks.’ ‘We are stronger when we are united,’ she told reporters.”

Trump’s Wrong Numbers Regarding Canada

CTV News wrote on January 27:

“U.S. President Donald Trump has made various and repeated claims about his country’s trade relationship with Canada to justify his tariff threats…  ‘It’s not fair that we should have a $200 billion or $250 billion deficit.’…

“The U.S. imports more Canadian goods than it exports north of the border. That difference is called a trade deficit. In 2023, the U.S. trade deficit with Canada was US$40.6 billion, according to research by the Centre for Future Work based on United States Census Bureau data. In 2024, the trade deficit is estimated to be around US $45 billion, according to TD Economics.

“In a report published online, TD noted it’s unclear where Trump got the $200 billion figure, which ‘is roughly four to five times the officially reported statistics.’ Those numbers are small relative to the roughly $1 trillion in goods and services that cross the border both ways each year. ‘Mr. Trump quite literally makes these numbers up and they can change from one day to the next, $100 billion, $200 billion, $300. It’s like a game show,’ said Jim Stanford, Economist and Director of the Centre for Future Work based in Vancouver…

“Crude oil makes up the majority of Canada’s exports to the U.S. If you remove it, that deficit becomes a surplus…”

Goliath’s Impressive Size

The Daily Mail wrote on January 26:

“… scientists say there was nothing supernatural about Goliath’s towering stature. Archaeologists have found the remains of other ‘giants’ dating back as far as 2700 BC – around the time of the biblical battle… these huge humans likely suffered from a rare genetic condition which caused them to grow to seemingly impossible sizes…

“The Bible says that his height is ‘six cubits and a span’ and that he wears bronze armour weighing ‘five thousand shekels’… Even though the measurement of six cubits and a span became standard translation, older versions of the Bible show a different measurement. For example, the Greek Septuagint, a translation of the Old Testament into Greek written between the first and third century BC, gives Goliath’s height as four cubits and a span…

“Archaeological investigations at Goliath’s home town suggest that his people used a cubit measuring 54cm (21.65 inches) and a span measuring. 22cm (8.66 inches).

That would make Goliath seven feet 10 inches (2.38m)…

“Clyde Billington, a biblical scholar and executive director of the Institute for Biblical Archaeology, told MailOnline: ‘The ancient cubit was the distance from the elbow to the tip of the middle finger. A span is the width of the hand, for example, like the way that the height of a horse is measured today. ‘This varied from individual to individual and only in Egypt was the cubit standardised at 20.66 inches (52.5 cm).’ Taking the Egyptian units, at six cubits and a span, Goliath would have measured…  10ft and 9 inches (3.28m).

“Even using the more accurate four cubits and a span measurement, this would still make Goliath about 7ft and 5 inches (2.26m). However, archaeologists now believe that the ancient Israelites would have used a different measurement system…

“In a paper published in 2014, Professor Morrison points out that the books of Samuel and Chronicles suggest that Goliath’s brother and his three sons were all gigantic in stature... This suggests that Goliath’s giantism was passed on genetically…”

For more information on biblical giants, please read part 4 of our free booklet, “Heavens and Earth… Before and After the First Man!”

The Tragedy of Aschaffenburg

Deutsche Welle wrote on January 28:

“The city of Aschaffenburg held a memorial service on Sunday for the victims of a knife attack in which two people were killed and three others were seriously injured. An Afghan asylum seeker who was due to be deported was arrested after the Wednesday attack, triggering renewed debate about immigration ahead of Germany’s national general election next month.

“The attacker targeted a group of children in a park, killing a 2-year-old Moroccan boy and a 41-year-old German man who was trying to protect the youngsters. He wounded three others, among them a Syrian girl aged two, who sustained neck wounds…

“In light of the incident, the conservative frontrunner to become chancellor after the February 23 election, Friedrich Mertz, promised a ‘fundamental’ overhaul of asylum rules and permanent border control. Merz’s CDU/CSU alliance currently leads in the polls with about 30% support while the far-right, anti-immigrant Alternative for Germany (AfD) is in second with 20%.”

The Bloodbath in Aschaffenburg

Bild Online wrote on January 23:

“Who is supposed to believe the Chancellor’s sudden determination?… The message: internal security is a top priority, now action is being taken.

“A few hours earlier, a 28-year-old Afghan had murdered two people in Aschaffenburg. He killed a 2-year-old child and an adult man with a kitchen knife. And as with so many terrible murders, it now turns out that the perpetrator should not be in Germany.

“Chancellor Olaf Scholz… is ‘sick’ of the acts of violence committed by immigrants. The authorities must… take immediate action. The Chancellor is only sick of it now? Only now must there be immediate action?…

“This is just a selection of knife murders that occurred during Scholz’s term in office:

“In 2022, a man from Eritrea attacked two girls in Illerkirchberg, one of whom died. In 2023, a Palestinian murdered two people in Brokstedt and seriously injured three others. In 2024, an Afghan stabbed a police officer in Mannheim. Shortly afterwards, a Syrian killed three people in Solingen and injured eight others. He too should have been deported by the authorities, but he remained in Germany.

“Wasn’t that enough to take immediate action?

‘It has been well known for years that Germany has no control over who comes into the country – and is not even close to deporting all migrants who are required to leave.

“In Olaf Scholz’s three years in government, Germany registered almost 800,000 asylum applications. This compares to around 50,000 deportations. More than half of all deportations fail… In 2023, around 40 percent of all suspects in violent crimes were non-German. The proportion was even higher for murder and manslaughter.

“For years, citizens in Germany have been fed up with people committing the worst acts of violence who shouldn’t even be in the country. Citizens have been demanding consequences for years from the authorities’ failure to deport people. Chancellor Scholz’s government had three years to ‘get fed up’ and ‘draw consequences’. Four weeks before the election, these announcements are no longer credible

“The bloody crime in Aschaffenburg is tearing our country out of a typically German illusion: Our politicians are discussing Donald Trump. They are getting worked up about US domestic politics, about Elon Musk, ‘America first’ and about whether this Trump can simply deport Mexicans and close his borders… This shows that Germany’s politics are not just out of touch with the world, they are out of touch with their homeland…”

Report 24 wrote on January 25:

“The terrorist attack in Aschaffenburg shook all of Germany and was viewed with horror around the world. At first, people’s justified anger was directed not only against the perpetrator and the politicians who caused such conditions, but also against employees of the established media. First, the case of BR reporter Barbara Ecke was discussed, who described the murder of a two-year-old child as an ‘interesting’ and ‘exciting’ event in otherwise rather boring Aschaffenburg.

“But the Ukrainian BRISANT presenter Kamilla Senjo, a news format on ARD, went one step further: She explained that the park in which the knife attack took place was a ‘dangerous place’ and asked why people would go for a walk there with children

“Everyone should weigh up and think through the meaning of these words for themselves very carefully. And ultimately also consider who is responsible for these conditions. Because 20, 30 years ago, anyone who questioned whether a park was a proper place for kindergarten children would have been put in a mental asylum…”

Uproar in Germany

Breitbart wrote on January 30:

“In what may serve as a pivotal moment of the federal election campaign and perhaps the future of German politics as a whole, the ‘firewall’ barring establishment parties in Berlin from working with the AfD broke down on Wednesday as Angela Merkel’s former party [under Friedrich Merz] partnered with the populist-sovereigntist party on a [non-binding] vote calling for migration restrictions…

“On Wednesday, both the Social Democrats (SPD, globalist left) and the Greens decided to vote against the motion. However, it narrowly passed by a margin of 348 votes to 344, with 187 CDU/CSU (Union) MPs, 75 AfD MPs, 80 MPs of the Free Democrats (FDP, liberalism), and six unaligned members. It marked the first time that a motion was passed with the help of the AfD since the party was founded…”

The Associated Press wrote on January 30:

“Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel on Thursday issued rare public criticism of her successor as the country’s center-right leader, the front-runner in Germany’s election next month, for putting to parliament proposals for tough new migration rules that only passed with the help of the AfD. Germany’s center-left governing parties have cast doubt on whether conservative leader Friedrich Merz can still be trusted not to bring the… AfD, into government after Wednesday’s events. He insists that he didn’t and won’t work with it, and that he didn’t break a political consensus, often called a ‘firewall,’ to shun the party. But Chancellor Olaf Scholz said Merz made ‘an inexcusable mistake.’… [Scholz also said he cannot trust Merz anymore.]

“Merkel, a former leader of Merz’s Christian Democratic Union, noted in a rare statement that Merz had said in November that no measures should be passed with AfD’s support before the Feb. 23 election…

“Merz took over the CDU after Merkel, a former rival, stepped down as chancellor in 2021. A more conservative figure, he has taken a more restrictive stance on migration. He said last week that Germany has had a ‘misguided asylum and immigration policy’ for a decade — since Merkel allowed large numbers of migrants into the country… However, her intervention could be problematic for Merz. Merz appears to hope that he will gain support by making the Union look decisive in forcing a tougher approach to migration… It’s uncertain whether that will succeed…. This week’s events soured the political atmosphere and may complicate efforts to form a coalition after the election…”

In addition, the Catholic and the Protestant Churches in Germany criticized Merz for his asylum policy and took the side of Scholz and the Greens. 

Murdered for Refusing to Serve in the Military

ntv wrote on January 26:

“On this Monday, the day of remembrance for the victims of National Socialism, Jehovah’s Witnesses remember 283 members of the religious community who were executed as conscientious objectors in the Second World War

“According to the Sachsenhausen Memorial, Dickmann was shot on September 15, 1939, at the age of 29, in front of his brother and other fellow prisoners in the former concentration camp. Walter Appel was… executed without a trial at the age of 17. His father – also a Jehovah’s Witness – had already been beheaded in October 1941 in Brandenburg Penitentiary as a conscientious objector.

“‘The persecution of these courageous Christians is not just part of history. Even today, Jehovah’s Witnesses are the target of imprisonment and violence in countries such as Russia and Eritrea, simply because they practice their peaceful faith,’ explained [the spokesman for Jehovah’s Witnesses in northern Germany, Michael] Tsifidaris. He added: ‘January 27 not only reminds us of the atrocities of the past, but also of the need to defend human rights and freedom of belief – especially now that hate crimes and religious persecution are on the rise again here too.’

“In 1996, then Federal President Roman Herzog declared the anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz extermination camp a day of remembrance in Germany. In June 2023, the Bundestag unanimously decided to erect a memorial for Jehovah’s Witnesses persecuted during the Nazi dictatorship.”

Sadly, religious persecution is indeed on the rise in Germany.

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News

German Ambassador to the US Attacks Trump

Deutsche Welle wrote on January 19:

“[Germany’s] ambassador to the US, Andreas Michaelis… penned a diplomatic write-up [and] sent [it] to the German Foreign Ministry [under Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock] and the office of Chancellor Olaf Scholz last week, [stating] that a second Trump term represents serious threats to the system of democratic checks and balances outlined in the US constitution… [He wrote:] ‘Fundamental democratic principles, along with checks and balances, will be undermined as far as possible, the legislature, law enforcement and media robbed of their independence and misused as political arms, and big tech will gain co-governing authority.’…

“Michaelis wrote that he expects Trump to affect a ‘maximum concentration of power in the hands of the president at the expense of Congress and the states.’ Michaelis went on to write that Trump’s policy ‘of maximum disruption, the breaking up of the established political order and bureaucratic structures as well as his plans for revenge ultimately mean a redefinition of the constitutional order.’… Michaelis, who will represent Germany at Trump’s inauguration on Monday, said he sees the incoming president as a man driven by a ‘desire for vengeance,’ musing that he will ‘largely sap’ the US of its democratic principles.”

Bild Online published a castigating editorial about Michaelis. It also stated that Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock defended the report of her ambassador. The incredible truth is that Michaelis’ left-wing accusations against Trump apply in fact to Biden’s actions.

Scholz: Elon Musk a Danger to European Democracy

Politico wrote on January 17:

“Tech billionaire Elon Musk’s friendliness with the far right ‘endangers’ democracy in Europe, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said Friday. ‘He supports the far right everywhere in Europe — in the U.K., in Germany, in many, many other countries — and that is something that is completely unacceptable,’ Scholz said at a press conference in Berlin. ‘It endangers the democratic development of Europe, it endangers our community and it must be criticized,’ the [present] German leader added.

“The social media mogul is also one of Donald Trump’s most vociferous supporters, earning himself a spot in the U.S. president-elect’s inner circle, and has backed Britain’s right-wing Reform UK…

“Scholz said he wasn’t against Musk expressing his freedom of speech, but: ‘His siding with the far right, whether for business interests or for reasons to do with his own political stance, is unacceptable.’ The Socialist chancellor’s comments are the latest in an ongoing feud with Musk, who has in turn called Scholz ‘a fool’ and claimed he will ‘lose’ the German federal election.”

Of course he will. Why are the “established” parties so afraid of the AfD? Note the next article as an example.

Holding People Accountable Who Caused “Many Covid Vaccine Deaths”

LifeSiteNews wrote on January 17:

“AfD (Alternative for German) co-head Alice Weidel has vowed to ‘hold accountable’ the people who enforced the draconian COVID regime and have caused ‘many vaccine death’” and serious side effects. Weidel recently spoke on X Spaces with Elon Musk, who endorsed her party, stating that ‘only AfD can save Germany’…

“Weidel said that the mRNA shots were suddenly presented as the only alternative even though they were ‘highly experimental.’ The politician also stated that the government did not just make ‘mistakes’ but purposefully lied about COVID and the jabs, as leaked documents from the top German health agency, the Robert Koch Institute, have showed.

“She announced that the AfD would initiate a parliamentary COVID investigation committee if her party reached the required 25 percent of the vote at the upcoming election. The AfD leader said that police are still carrying out house searches of doctors who were critical of the mainstream COVID narrative. She compared the current German state, along with near-total conformity of all mainstream media outlets, to socialist East Germany.

“Weidel thanked the people who took to the streets to protest the government’s draconian COVID policies and all the doctors and medical professionals who opposed the regime. During the time of COVID, the AfD was the only party in Germany that unanimously opposed the government’s draconian policies, including an attempt to introduce a COVID shot mandate for people over the age of 60.”

No wonder Germany’s “established” parties want to silence the AfD (and Musk), since they are all guilty of violating people’s constitutional rights during the coronavirus debacle.

Europeans Attack Musk Over Alleged Nazi Salute

Politico wrote on January 20:

Europe’s left-wingers on Tuesday raced to condemn Elon Musk after the world’s richest man performed a stiff-armed salute at an event to celebrate new United States President Donald Trump. ‘My heart goes out to you,’ Musk said on stage at Washington’s Capital One Arena, as he thanked Trump’s supporters. He then put his hand to his chest and extended a rigid right arm with his palm down, resembling the salute made infamous by Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini and Europe’s fascists in the first half of the 20th century. Musk then repeated the gesture a second time facing the crowd on the opposite side…

“‘I will start by talking about the response, or perhaps the lack of responses of the EU to Trump’s inauguration. It represents a threat to the whole of the European Union,’ said French member of the European Parliament Manon Aubry, co-chair of The Left group, at a press conference Tuesday morning. ‘Let’s start by keeping things simple, I am sure everyone saw the Nazi salute, I select these words carefully, the Nazi salute of Elon Musk.’

“In Germany, where Musk’s political backing for the far-right Alternative for Germany has already caused issues ahead of a snap election on Feb. 23, the government hit out over the controversial salute. ‘I definitely don’t think highly of Elon Musk as a politician, from what we know so far. But such a gesture, given his already known proximity to right-wing populists in the fascist tradition, must worry every democrat,’  said German Health Minister Karl Lauterbach from the center-left Social Democratic Party. [Lauterbach has been nicknamed the German Fauci, due to his terrible governmental measures during the Coronavirus epidemic.]

“In Italy, popular journalist Roberto Saviano… rained down invective on {Musk]. ‘May you be cursed,’ Saviano said. ‘The end of all this will be violent. His fall will be equal to that of those to whom it historically refers with this gesture. Musk will fall at the hands of those he now incites fueled by the same violence he practices.’

“In Spain… Yolanda Díaz, the minister of labor and social economy from the left-wing Sumar party, said: ‘Last night, the whole planet could see Elon Musk emulating the Nazi salute in the context of Donald Trump’s inauguration… She then accused Musk of having transformed X into ‘a propaganda mechanism that uses its algorithm to favor certain ideas over others and, in doing so, influence public opinion… From now on, I will no longer use my account,’ she said.

“Musk defended himself online, denouncing the attacks as ‘dirty tricks’ from his opponents. ‘The “everyone is Hitler” attack is sooo tired,’ he said.  His supporters also defended the gesture, blaming it on the billionaire entrepreneur being ‘autistic.’

“‘The Roman Empire is back, starting with the Roman salute,’ wrote Andrea Stroppa, a key adviser to Musk in Italy, sharing the video on X. Stroppa later deleted the post, however, and replaced it with a new one saying: ‘That gesture, which some mistook for a Nazi salute, is simply Elon, who has autism, expressing his feelings by saying “I want to give my heart to you,” and that is exactly what he communicated into the microphone,’ he said, adding: ‘Elon dislikes extremists!’”

The Sun wrote on January 21:

“The Nazi salute, also known as the Hitler or Sieg Heil salute, was used as a common greeting in Germany under the Third Reich. It was originally based on the so-called Roman salute and was adopted by the Italian Fascist Party, whose leadership under Benito Mussolini was a major inspiration to Adolf Hitler. Its use is illegal in several countries today, including Germany, Austria, and Slovakia.”

Left-Wing Jewish Jerry Nadler Attacks Musk

Jewish Telegraph Agency (JTA) wrote on January 20:

Jerry Nadler, the Jewish Democratic congressman from Manhattan, called the gesture antisemitic and said other officials should condemn it. ‘I never imagined we would see the day when what appears to be a Heil Hitler salute would be made behind the Presidential seal,’ Nadler tweeted. ‘This abhorrent gesture has no place in our society and belongs in the darkest chapters of human history. I urge all of my colleagues to unite in condemning this hateful gesture for what it is: antisemitism.’

“Around the same time as Nadler’s tweet, the Anti-Defamation League, the antisemitism watchdog group, issued its own ruling: ‘not a Nazi salute’

“The Nazi salute was itself borrowed from Italian fascists, who adapted it from the ancient Romans. Musk has venerated (and shared imagery of himself in)  ancient Rome and has suggested America faces problems like those that led to the end of the Roman Empire…”

Nadler himself had become the subject of a controversy in 2023 when he refused to vote for a Republican bill condemning anti-Semitism, stating that not “all forms of anti-Semitism” should be denounced, as “anti-Zionism” is “expressly not antisemitic.”

Breitbart Clears It All Up

Breitbart wrote on January 21:

“The regime media wasted no time launching its Hoax Machine. Within hours of Donald Trump being sworn in as our 47th president, these disgraced and increasingly irrelevant serial liars tried to fool America into believing Elon Musk threw out a couple of Nazi salutes.

“What Musk did was not at all confusing to decent people. Speaking to a crowd of Trump supporters Monday at the Capital One Arena in Washington, DC, he said, ‘I just want to say thank you for making it happen. Thank you.’ Then he touches his heart and makes a gesture throwing his heart out to the crowd. Then he literally says, ‘Thank you. My heart goes out to you. It is thanks to you that the future of civilization is assured, thanks to you.’…

People make this gesture all the time. That might be a surprise to some of you, but the fact it’s surprising is not your fault because when the people… do it, no one on the right makes a big deal of it…

“Normal People understand the difference between ‘Sieg Heil!’ and ‘My heart goes out to you.’ Normal People understand that as thousands of leftist students and academics marched across America’s elite campuses in solidarity with Hamas, this same media worked overtime to spin this antisemitic hate as free speech. Normal People understand the difference between calling for an ‘intifada revolution’ during Passover and ‘My heart goes out to you.’”

Hamas to Expel Israel as Soon as Possible

Israel Today wrote on January 16:

Senior Hamas official Khalil al-Hayya repeated the terrorist organization’s commitment to the destruction of Israel in his first public remarks since green-lighting the truce deal with the Jewish state on Wednesday night… Al-Hayya described the Oct. 7, 2023, massacre of 1,200 people in Israel as a ‘miraculous’ achievement, declaring the atrocities would ‘remain a source of pride’ for Palestinians, ‘passed down through generations….

“Hamas terrorists ‘will expel the occupation from our land and from Al Quds [Jerusalem] at the earliest time possible… We also recall the illuminating stances of many countries that stood with us across various fields,’ said the terrorist leader, praising the support from Turkey, South Africa, Algeria, Russia, China, Malaysia, Indonesia, Belgium, Spain and Ireland…

“Posting to social media in Hebrew, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei claimed the Tehran-backed ‘resistance’ had succeeded in forcing the Jewish state to ‘retreat’… Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps likewise hailed the deal as ‘a clear victory and a great victory for Palestine and a bigger defeat for the monstrous Zionist regime.’”

This was so predictable.

Hostage Deal Approved

The Associated Press reported on January 17:

Israel’s [full] Cabinet approved a deal early Saturday for a ceasefire in Gaza that would release dozens of hostages held there and pause the 15-month war with Hamas, bringing the sides a step closer to ending their deadliest and most destructive fighting ever.

“The government announced the approval after 1 a.m. Jerusalem time Saturday, following a [seven hour long meeting of deliberation and debate] of the full Cabinet that went well past the beginning of the Jewish Sabbath, in a reflection of the moment’s importance. In line with Jewish law, the Israeli government usually halts all business for the Sabbath except in emergency cases of life or death…

“The ceasefire — just the second achieved during the war — will go into effect Sunday, though key questions remain, including the names of the 33 hostages to be released during the six-week first phase of the ceasefire and who among them is still alive….”

Twenty-four ministers voted in favor, and eight ministers voted against the deal. Especially National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich voted against the deal, and so did ministers from the Religious Zionists Party and Otzma Yehudit, as well as Likud Ministers David Amsalem and Amichai Chikli.

Prime Minister Netanyahu told the cabinet that President-elect Donald Trump had given his full backing for Israel to restart the war should Hamas violate the agreement before phase two of the deal.

In an interview with Fox News, Mike Huckabee, the new U.S. ambassador to Israel, supported this statement regarding violations before and after phase two and added that he is also totally opposed to a two-state solution. It’s still a long way to Tipperary…

Hostage Deal—“Murdering Jews Pays!”

Israel 365 News reported on January 19:

“The list of terrorists being released as part of this so-called ceasefire deal is out, and I am furious. Among them is the murderer of my dear friend, Ari Fuld hy”d. Ari was a proud, passionate Jew, brutally murdered simply for the ‘crime’ of living as a Jew in our ancestral homeland. His murderer, like so many others on this list, is being set free—not because of justice but as a reward for Hamas’s inhumane hostage-taking.

“This isn’t just about Ari, though his loss is deeply personal to me and countless others. Ari’s story is one of many. These terrorists have brutally murdered Jews—children, mothers, fathers—just for daring to live proud, Jewish lives in the land of Israel. And now, their release sends a chilling message: killing Jews pays.

“This isn’t just about releasing convicted killers. It’s about empowering future ones. These released terrorists will almost certainly return to terrorism, as history has shown us time and again. Their release is a clear death sentence for hundreds, if not thousands, of Jews in the future. Even worse: their release inspires others to follow in their footsteps, knowing that murdering Jews not only leads to hero status but to eventual freedom, even after a horrific invasion and massacre like Oct. 7th, 2023.

“The immorality of Western leaders—those who pushed Israel into this abhorrent deal—screams to the heavens. Why is Israel being pressured to release murderous terrorists instead of Hamas being convinced to release innocent hostages unconditionally?

“The Biden and Trump teams have chosen to treat Qatar and Egypt as ‘neutral mediators,’ when in reality, both are complicit in Hamas’s terror. Qatar is a state sponsor of Hamas, funneling money and political support to the very organization that orchestrated the October 7th massacre. Egypt knowingly allowed weapons to flow into Gaza, aiding Hamas’s buildup. Yet, instead of holding Qatar and Egypt accountable, these Western leaders have handed them the reins of diplomacy.

“If the U.S. and others were truly committed to justice and morality, they would pressure Qatar and Egypt to force Hamas to release all hostages without preconditions. Qatar could cut Hamas off in a second, but instead, it enjoys playing the middleman, gaining international legitimacy while funding terror…

“Of course, we rejoice in the return of hostages! But it’s impossible to ignore the immense price we are paying both in the short-term release of terrorists and the long-term consequences. This is not just about the lives these terrorists will take in the future but the treacherous message for which all of humanity will suffer: that terrorism pays…”

AFP reported on January 18 that more than 1,890 imprisoned Palestinian criminals [Bild called them “Hamas criminals”] in exchange for 33 hostages held by Hamas are to be set free under the deal.

Please view our recent StandingWatch program, titled, “The Hostage Deal—Peace in the Middle East?” 

Far-Right Ministers Resign in Protest

 Times of Israel wrote on January 19:

“National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir’s far-right Otzma Yehudit party quit the coalition on Sunday morning, following through on its threat to exit if the government agreed to a ceasefire agreement with Hamas in the Gaza Strip.

“In a statement, the party said that its three cabinet members — Ben Gvir, Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu, and Negev, Galilee and National Resilience Minister Yitzhak Wasserlauf — submitted resignation letters to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. In addition, MKs Zvika Fogel, Limor Son Har-Melech and Yitzhak Kroizer resigned their spots on the various committees they were members of. ‘From this time onwards the Otzma Yehudit party is not a member of the coalition,’ the party declared…

“Writing to Netanyahu, Ben Gvir… complained of what he says was the prime minister’s ‘surrender-to-terror deal, which crosses all ideological red lines.’ The ceasefire constitutes ‘a complete victory for terrorism,’ Ben Gvir declared…  ‘We will not return to the government table without a complete victory against Hamas and the full realization of the war’s goals,’ he added.”

Hamas Terrorist Rejoice

The U.S. Sun wrote on January 19:

“HAMAS terrorists have come out of hiding to celebrate the new ceasefire agreed with Israel. Shock pictures show the shameless, gun-wielding fighters waving the green banner of the terror group and the crest of its armed militia. Pictures show men in balaclavas and camo fatigues waving their guns as they travelled through various towns in the Gaza Strip.

 “… And it has been warned the group has managed to retain much of its strength. Slain terror boss Yahya Sinwar’s brother Mohammed is understood to be rebuilding the shattered remains of Hamas.”

Europe to Get Involved

Deutsche Welle wrote on January 16:

“The EU watched from the sidelines as the US, Egypt and Qatar mediated a three-phase ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas… The 27 countries of the EU… may now have an important role to play. ‘The EU is ready to support the implementation of the ceasefire,’ EU foreign affairs spokesman Anouar El-Anouni told reporters at a briefing… On Thursday, the EU indicated it was on standby to work with international partners, particularly the Gulf states, when the time came. ‘Now we need to see what the future holds,’ El-Anouni said…

“[A] crucial question is how much the EU will be able to influence developments after the ceasefire… figures in [Trump’s] incoming administration have voiced support for the current Israeli government’s more extreme nationalist positions, for example in favor of more of the settlements deemed illegal by the EU and UN…”

And so, Europe will get involved more and more in the affairs of the Middle East… turning AGAINST Israel AND the USA.

Germany to Send Troops to Ukraine?

AFP wrote on January 18:

“Germany’s defence minister said he was open to sending German soldiers to Ukraine to help secure a demilitarised zone there if a ceasefire were agreed with Russia…  Boris Pistorius also said Germany should aim to spend around three percent of GDP [rather than currently 2 percent] on defence.

“US President-elect Donald Trump wants members of the NATO military alliance to devote five percent of their national output on defence, a demand that has already been rejected as too high by German Chancellor Olaf Scholz [‘For Germany, that would mean finding an additional 150 billion euros every year,’ Scholz said on January 6].

“Asked about a possible deployment of German troops to help secure a buffer zone between Russia and Ukraine if one were agreed, Pistorius said: ‘We’re the largest NATO partner in Europe. We’ll obviously have a role to play.’ He said the issue would ‘be discussed in due time.’”

Ending the Russia-Ukraine War in 24 Hours?

NBC News wrote on January 18:

“On the campaign trail, Donald Trump vowed to quickly end the war in Ukraine. He’d do it in ‘24 hours’ after taking the oath, he said, or even before his inauguration. But as he prepares to return to the White House, it’s clear that promise will go unfulfilled…

“Since Trump’s election victory, his team has not outlined a peace proposal to Ukraine’s leadership… Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., Trump’s choice for secretary of state, told senators at his confirmation hearing on Wednesday that forging a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia will be ‘very difficult.’ 

“Trump’s… chosen envoy to Ukraine says the new administration’s goal is a peace deal within 100 days.” [That would be on or about April 30.]

Breitbart wrote on January 22:

“President Donald Trump… demanded the Russian president end the war. If Putin does not, Trump said [on Wednesday], the United States would place ‘taxes, tariffs, and sanctions’ on Russia… ‘We can do it the easy way, or the hard way — and the easy way is always better,’ he added…”

Guttenberg’s Dark Intentions

Report 24 wrote on January 21, 2025:

“Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, former German Minister of Economics and Defense, who failed due to a plagiarism scandal, is now working as a lobbyist. As such, he appeared at the Oberbank’s business gala – and made astonishing noise in front of 1,500 guests. Europe must become more militarily capable in order to stand up to ‘Bully Trump’. It sounds like a secret longing for a two-front war that didn’t end particularly well last time [in World War II].”

Guttenberg also claimed that it will take a long time for Europe to achieve a level of military resilience that no longer requires the United States to withstand an attack. He is very wrong about this.

Karl Habsburg Against Russia

Report 24 wrote on January 21:

“Every year the grandson of the last emperor, Karl Habsburg, gives a ‘speech on the future of Europe’ as part of the Pan-European movement. Habsburg has been noticed as an enemy of Russia for a very long time…

“In his speech, Habsburg declared that Russia was a traditional colonial empire that exploited its colonies and used the people of the colonies as cannon fodder in war…. In his opinion, a Europe that cares about the security of its citizens should design scenarios that lead to the disintegration of Russia…

“Towards the end of the speech, Habsburg then called for… direct attacks on Russian territory… Hatred of Russia obviously has a long tradition in the Habsburg family. Otto Habsburg, father of Karl Habsburg, also regularly agitated against Russia and Putin.”

Pope Francis’ Moral Blindness

Israel 365 News wrote on January 14:

Pope Francis lied once more about Israel’s efforts to defend itself against Islamist entities attacking its citizens, entirely adopting the Hamas-run Health Ministry’s narrative. He called for… the establishment of a Palestinian state inside the borders of Israel…

“The pope also called for a return to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) deal with Iran that would allow the Islamist regime to initiate a nuclear weapons program. ‘More recently, I think of the positive signs of a resumption of negotiations to return to the framework of the Iran nuclear deal, with the aim of ensuring a safer world for all,’ the Pope’s statement read…

“In his letter to the pope, Rabbi Eliezer Simcha Weisz, a member of the Council of the Israeli Chief Rabbinate, criticized the Pope’s statements, saying that Pope Francis’ statements ‘are not merely disappointing, they represent a historic danger’ and ‘revived the darkest patterns of Catholic Church history—patterns that for centuries transformed false accusations into violence against the Jewish people… Your portrayal of this conflict deliberately ignores the tragic reality that Hamas deliberately embeds its terrorist infrastructure within civilian areas using hospitals, schools, mosques, and churches as military installations and weapons depots. They cynically use Palestinian children and civilians as human shields, forcing Israel to make impossible choices in its legitimate fight for survival.

“‘Your failure to acknowledge this cruel exploitation of innocent lives, while condemning Israel’s efforts to defend itself, reveals a profound moral blindness. Every casualty in this war is a tragedy, but the responsibility lies squarely with Hamas, who intentionally maximize civilian casualties for propaganda purposes. Your silence on these tactics, coupled with your persistent portrayal of Israel as an aggressor, sends destructive ripples across the global consciousness at a speed and scale unimaginable to your predecessors.’

“… Pope Francis [had] called for an investigation into claims that Israel is carrying out a ‘genocide’ in Gaza… Pope Francis has a history of being myopic regarding Palestinians and Arabs bent on destroying the Jewish state. In 2015, just a few days after the Vatican officially recognized the Palestinian state, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas was granted an audience in the Apostolic Palace. After the meeting, Francis gave Abbas a special medallion, representing the angel of peace ‘destroying the bad spirit of war.’ The Pope explained to Abbas that the gift was appropriate since ‘you are an angel of peace.’” 

You just can’t make this up. How more ridiculous can it get?

Sharp Rebuke For Pope Over Criticism of Israel

The Kronenzeitung wrote on January 17:

“Pope Francis has been sharply reprimanded by Italy’s chief rabbi for repeatedly criticizing Israel’s military action in the Gaza Strip. Rabbi Riccardo Di Segni accuses the Argentinian of ‘selective indignation’ and ‘reviving anti-Jewish sentiment’.

“Francis has unfairly focused his attention on Israel compared to other ongoing conflicts in the world, including those in Sudan, Yemen, Syria and Ethiopia, Rabbi Riccardo Di Segni, spiritual leader of the Jewish community in Rome since 2001, said on Thursday at a meeting on the theme ‘Pilgrims of Hope’ on the occasion of the 36th Day of Dialogue between Catholics and Jews in Rome. ‘This is a moment in which it seems that the Church, or at least a part of it, is once again giving in to the temptation to burn bridges with Judaism. The war that has been raging since October 7, 2023, also has Jewish-Christian dialogue among its collateral victims,’ lamented the rabbi, who also spoke of the ‘revival’ and ‘strengthening of anti-Jewish sentiments’.

“Francis, the head of the 1.4 billion-member Roman Catholic Church, has recently spoken out increasingly about Israel’s military action against the militant Palestinian group Hamas. Last week, he described the humanitarian situation in Gaza as ‘very serious and shameful’.”

The Pope clearly turns out to be antisemitic.

The Pope’s Grave Sin Hypocrisy

Breitbart wrote on January 16:

“The Vatican City State has enacted stiffer penalties on anyone entering its territory or violating its airspace without permission, threatening offenders with fines and jail time. The Vatican has hiked both monetary sanctions and prison sentences for those who violate its tight security regulations… violators will face monetary fines ranging from 10,000 to 25,000 euros and prison sentences from one to four years.

“The Vatican City State, the world’s only completely walled-in sovereign territory, has several entry points, all but one of which — the Saint Anna gate — are locked tight from dusk until dawn. The gates are manned by the Swiss Guard, with gendarmes carrying firearms not far off…

“The new decree also introduces new provisions concerning unauthorized overflight of Vatican airspace, including with the use of drones, with penalties of up to three years in prison.

“Last August, Pope Francis suggested that immigration laws should not be made stricter but rather looser, to allow more immigrants to cross international borders, adding that turning away migrants is a ‘grave sin’… The push for more streamlined international migration has been a hallmark of the Francis papacy, while he has demonized as ‘xenophobic’ those who call for strong…  borders. The pontiff has also insisted that the safety of migrants — legal or illegal — should take precedence over national security concerns and that they should not be subjected to collective deportations.”

MSN wrote on January 20:

“Pope Francis said Donald Trump’s plans to impose mass deportations of immigrants would be a ‘disgrace,’ as he weighed in on the incoming U.S. president’s pledges nearly a decade after calling him ‘not Christian’ for wanting to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexican border. Francis made the comments during an appearance at an evening talk show, and then followed up Monday with an official telegram of congratulations to Trump on the day of his inauguration…”

Such hypocrisy by a “Marxist” pope is difficult to swallow.

Norway Prepares for War

vg wrote on January 11:

“The Norwegian people… must be prepared for war. We cannot rule out war… the truth is that Norway is not well equipped to deal with a real crisis, and certainly not a war

“There are not enough shelters today that can keep the population safe during attacks… It has already been decided that 4,500 more young people will have to enter their first-time service. Now 4,000 more will have to serve civilian service…”

“We Must Protect Ourselves Against Trump”

vg wrote on January 12:

“Donald Trump’s statements about making the United States bigger, this time in actual size, are frightening. The events of recent days have made the question of Norwegian EU membership even more relevant. The incoming US president has opened up about buying Greenland from Denmark, taking over the Panama Canal, and making Canada part of the US. Trump is threatening the Danes with particularly high tariff walls if they don’t give in. He doesn’t even rule out the use of military means, either in the case of Greenland or Panama. It’s unbelievable.

“It’s time to have the big conversation about where Norway belongs in the world. Who we should be with in the years ahead. How we should stay as safe as possible in turbulent times. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine almost three years ago caused our two close neighbors, Sweden and Finland, to completely change their foreign policy. Almost overnight. They both applied for membership in NATO, the alliance they had been outside of throughout the Cold War, in the decades after World War II…

“With Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the world had become more dangerous, including for Norway… The United States has always been the guarantor of our security. Hopefully, it will continue to be so… The cooperation between Norway and the United States on defense and intelligence is strong and deep. Especially in the high north, where Russia has a large part of its nuclear weapons, just across the border from Norway.

Our geographical location means that the United States will always want to be close to Norway. This will not change even if the United States gets an unpredictable president, with a completely different view of international law and justice than any American president before him. But there is still every reason to ensure that Norway has more people to lean on if we get into serious trouble. In the worst case, in the form of war…

“We will be much better equipped to face such threats if we are part of the EU. Security policy cooperation within the union is becoming increasingly stronger… With Trump’s announced tariff walls and possible trade war, we risk ending up in a pinch between two blocs, with the US on one side and the EU on the other… For Norway, the safest thing is to stand together with Europe. Fully and completely.”

But it may not work out that way. In fact, there is strong support for the idea that Scandinavian countries—Norway, Sweden and Finland, and perhaps even The Netherlands—will not end up being part of the EU… or most certainly not of “core Europe.”

Trump’s Litmus Test

The Ron Paul Institute wrote on January 17:

“Trump’s litmus test awaits him on the Oval Office desk.  The litmus test is the pardon for every one of the wrongly indicted and wrongly prosecuted January 6 Trump supporters–which means all of them–who attended the rally and were persecuted for doing so.  If Trump fails to immediately issue a full and unconditional pardon to all, he will lose the support of MAGA Americans…

“In my view, full pardon for all is just one-third of what needs to be done. Another one-third is restitution for all expenses, lost income, and stress from being wrongly prosecuted and locked away from family, friends, and career in prison. In some cases the… Democrats imprisoned the wrongly convicted  great distances from their communities, thus depriving them of support from visits from family and friends. Some were kept in solitary confinement…

“The remaining one-third is actually the most important one-third. The DOJ, FBI, and White House officials responsible for the indictments, prosecutions, and imprisonments must be indicted, prosecuted and sentenced. By weaponizing law for propaganda and political purposes and by using false indictments for the purpose of suppressing the powerful evidence of massive vote fraud in the 2020 presidential election, high law enforcement officials committed felonies. They must be held accountable for their crimes.  Otherwise, legal precedents are created that are fateful for democracy, the rule of law,  and accountable government…

“How can Trump permit the government officials who intentionally framed innocent people for political and propaganda purposes to walk away unpunished?”

If Trump’s past is a guide for his future conduct, then it is not to be expected that most of these recommendations will be carried out. But notice the next article:

CNN wrote on January 20:

“President Donald Trump on Monday pardoned US Capitol rioters, saying the pardon would cover 1,500 people, which would appear to cover nearly everyone charged since the attack on January 6, 2021. ‘These are the hostages,’ Trump said…

“By pardoning the defendants, Trump has granted full clemency to hundreds of people already convicted of felony crimes like assaulting police and destroying property.”

Trump Defends TikTok

Deutsche Welle wrote on January 19:

“On Sunday, incoming US President Donald Trump said he would issue an executive order delaying a ban on TikTok… Trump’s comments came after the app went dark in the US ahead of a federal ban recently upheld by the US Supreme Court. ‘I’m asking companies not to let TikTok stay dark,’ Trump wrote on his own social media platform Truth Social. ‘Americans deserve to see our exciting inauguration on Monday as well as other events and conversations.’

“In response to Trump’s comments, TikTok said it would restore service in the US, and thanked the president-elect for ‘providing the necessary clarity and assurance to our service providers that they will face no penalties providing TikTok to over 170 million Americans and allowing over 7 million small businesses to thrive.’

“Trump, who called for a similar ban in the past, also floated the idea of a US-China joint venture ownership deal [He wrote: ‘I would like the United States to have a 50% ownership position in a joint venture.’] The president-elect reportedly said he would not be opposed to continued Chinese ownership of the app as long as steps were taken to ensure US user used data was protected and stored in the US, according to incoming National Security Advisor Mike Waltz.”

Trump’s flip-flop seems to be in recognition that many TikTok users voted for him.

Trump’s Liberal LGBT Agenda

NYP reported on January 18:

“President Trump is assembling an administration stocked with prominent gay and lesbian Americans… Among the picks:

“Scott Bessent, 62, treasury secretary. If confirmed, the hedge fund manager would be the highest-ranking openly gay official in US history. Ric Grenell, 58, presidential envoy for special missions. He was Trump’s director of national intelligence during his first term [and US ambassador to Germany]. Tammy Bruce, 62, the new State Department spokesperson was a Fox News contributor. Jacob Helberg, 35, undersecretary of state for economic growth, energy, and the environment. Bill White, 57, ambassador to Belgium. Art Fisher, 49, ambassador to Austria.

“And at least 10 other prominent LGBT Americans are slated for major administration posts, one Trump insider said.”

Imam Ousted

Jewish Insider wrote on January 20:

“An imam who refused to acknowledge Hezbollah as a terrorist organization was removed as a speaker at President Donald Trump’s inauguration after previously being slated to deliver a benediction…

“A spokesperson for the newly inaugurated 47th president did not immediately respond to an inquiry from JI asking why Al-Husainy was removed from the lineup. Trump did not include an imam in his inauguration ceremony when he first took office in 2017.”

Trump’s Inauguration Speech

ABC News wrote on January 20:

“President Donald Trump offered a scathing rebuke of his predecessor’s term while laying out the immediate actions he plans to take on the first day of his second term in office, saying in his inauguration remarks, ‘America’s decline is over.’…

“Trump continued to lay out his expansionist vision for the U.S., including a plan to gain control of the Panama Canal. ‘American ships are being severely overcharged and not treated fairly in any way, shape or form, and that includes the United States Navy,’ he said. ‘Above all, China is operating the Panama Canal. And we didn’t give it to China. We gave it to Panama. And we’re taking it back.’…

“He also referred to the assassination attempt against him in Pennsylvania last year. ‘Those who wish to stop our cause have tried to take my freedom and indeed, to take my life. Just a few months ago in a beautiful Pennsylvania field, an assassin’s bullet ripped through my ear, but I felt then, and believe even more so now that my life was saved for a reason. I was saved by God to Make America Great Again.’

“Trump celebrated his historic comeback throughout his speech. He is only the second president in U.S. history, after Grover Cleveland in 1892, to win election to a non-consecutive second term, and is the first convicted felon to take the office. ‘Many people thought it was impossible for me to stage such a historic political comeback. But as you see today, here I am, the American people have spoken,’ Trump said.”

Trump also said subsequently that Denmark would come along to sell Greenland. Regarding the Panama Canal, please see our new StandingWatch program, titled“Will the USA Take the Panama Canal Back?”  

Trump’s Executive Orders

Daily Mail wrote on January 20:

“Trump is signing approximately 200 executive orders on Monday in a massive crackdown on Day One of his second term… One of his more interesting proposals is to rename or restore previous titles to landmarks and bodies of water bordering the U.S., including the new ‘Gulf of America.’…

“Trump vowed that he would keep TikTok working in the U.S. – even after the Supreme Court ruled last week that it could not operate in the country… Trump’s order extends the time period for when the law prohibiting TikTok’s U.S. operations takes effect so he can work towards a deal to protect national security from Beijing…

“Trump is declaring that the federal government will only recognize two sexes – male and female…

“Trump is also putting a stop to all issuance of new foreign aid…  The order is likely to immediately halt the distribution of U.S. money from going to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), which distributes aid in Gaza and is accused of close ties to the terror group Hamas…

“Trump is ending birthright citizenship for illegal immigrants. This means anyone born on U.S. soil, but whose parents are undocumented aliens will no longer be a de facto citizen of the United States of America. Advocates for asylum seekers and undocumented immigrants claim this is against the 14th Amendment of the Constitution, which created the unique birthright citizenship rule for anyone born in the U.S

“Trump is also directing the Department of Defense to send troops to assist with securing America’s borders… He is declaring a national emergency at the southern border… Trump is also ending catch-and-release, a policy that allowed illegal border crossers seeking asylum to be detained and then released within the country as they awaited a court date. He is reinstating the Remain in Mexico policy that makes illegal border hoppers wait in the last country where they crossed from, which is most often Mexico, as they wait for a court date to make their asylum claims. And Trump is requiring that his promised and famed southern border wall is finally completed.

“Trump is designating cartels as terrorist organizations, which will change the way that they are handled when it comes to foreign affairs and defense regarding attacks by these cartel members…

“The president will withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accords and end the so-called Green New Deal. Trump is ordering that Alaska’s Denali mountain go by its original moniker Mount McKinley

“Trump is creating a complimentary agency to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to deal with external taxes and tariffs. Like the IRS, the External Revenue Service (ERS) will collect and uphold laws related to taxes on foreign countries. It comes after Trump said in November that he will impose a 25 percent tariff on Canada and Mexico. He also wants to put an additional 10 percent tax on goods from China – on top of other existing tariffs…”

Trump also signed an executive order withdrawing from the World Health Organization. He announced that he would sign executive orders by February 1 to impose 25 percent tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada.

In another executive order, Trump “pardoned 23 anti-abortion protesters imprisoned under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, which was enacted in 1994 in large part to protect people entering abortion clinics” (Deutsche Welle, dated January 23).

Regarding ending birthright citizenship, the New York Post wrote on January 20:

“The federal government will no longer recognize the immediate citizenship of children of illegal immigrants born in the US ‘on a prospective basis’… the action could raise legal questions, since the 14th Amendment states, ‘All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.’”

Fox News added on January 20:

“Officials told reporters in a press call that Trump will sign an order clarifying language in the 14th Amendment and stating that the federal government ‘will not recognize automatic birthright citizenship for children of illegal aliens born in the United States’…

“Trump advisers and some conservative legal scholars have previously argued that the idea of giving birthright citizenship to children of illegal immigrants is based on a misreading of the amendment…”

This executive order is already being challenged in court, and a decision on this issue is anything but certain, even though most legal scholars feel Trump’s argument will not prevail in light of the clear language of the 14th Amendment. Read about the further developments below:

Restriction of Birthright Citizenship Blocked

Breitbart wrote on January 23:

“A federal judge on Thursday put a temporary block on US President Donald Trump’s attempt to restrict birthright citizenship. The ruling imposes a 14-day halt on the enforcement of one of the most controversial executive orders Trump signed in the hours after he was sworn into office for a second term. ‘This is a blatantly unconstitutional order,’ US District Judge John Coughenour was reported as saying during the hearing in Washington state. ‘I’ve been on the bench for over four decades, I can’t remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one is,’ said Coughenour, who was appointed by a Republican president, Ronald Reagan…

“Trump’s order was premised on the idea that anyone in the US illegally, or on a visa, was not ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the country, and therefore excluded from this category. An incredulous Coughenour chided Justice Department attorney Brett Shumate over his assertion that Trump’s order was constitutional. ‘Frankly, I have difficulty understanding how a member of the Bar could state unequivocally that this is a constitutional order,’ Coughenour said. ‘It just boggles my mind.’

“Trump’s opponents have argued that the 14th Amendment, which was ratified in 1868 as the United States sought to knit itself back together after the Civil War, has been settled law for over a century. They have cited an 1898 US Supreme Court ruling in the case of a San Francisco-born Chinese American man called Wong Kim Ark. Wong was denied entry back into the United States after visiting relatives in China on the grounds that he was not a citizen. The court affirmed that children born in the United States, including those born to immigrants, could not be denied citizenship.”

The Associated Press added on January 23:

“Trump quickly responded by saying his administration will appeal the decision, a cornerstone of his planned efforts to rein in illegal immigration… The U.S. is among about 30 countries where birthright citizenship… is applied. Most are in the Americas, and Canada and Mexico are among them…

“Trump’s order asserts that the children of noncitizens are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, and orders federal agencies to not recognize citizenship for children who don’t have at least one parent who is a citizen… some advocates of immigration restrictions have argued that [the Wong] case clearly applied to children born to parents who were both legal immigrants. They say it’s less clear whether it applies to children born to parents living in the country illegally…

“One of the lawsuits aimed at blocking the executive order includes the case of a pregnant woman… who is not a citizen but has lived in the United States for more than 15 years and has a pending visa application that could lead to permanent residency status…”

To be clear,  on January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order titled, “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,” which asserts that citizenship may only be conferred to children with one or more parents who hold U.S. citizenship or lawful permanent resident (LPR) status (i.e., a “green card”). It encompasses all children born on or after February 19, 2025, on U.S. soil who do not have at least one U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident parent. Encompassed are all nonimmigrant visa holders, including but not limited to participants in the Visa Waiver Program, F-1 students, and B-1, B-2, H-1B, H-4, L-1, L-2, E-1, E-2, E-3, TN, and O-1 visa holders. This order applies regardless of whether the parents have been maintaining status as a nonimmigrants. This change in longstanding interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment will not apply retroactively and will only impact individuals born thirty days after the date of the order.

If allowed the stand, the order would mean children born after February 19 to mothers or fathers who are not citizens or lawful permanent residents could be deported and would not be allowed to receive Social Security numbers, government benefits or the right to work lawfully when they are older (compare Deutsche Welle, January 23).

Declassifying Files on JFK, RFK, MLK Assassinations

The New York Post wrote on January 23:

“President Trump on Thursday ordered the declassification and release of long-secret files on the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, his brother Robert F. Kennedy and civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr.

“Trump, 78, announced the actions in the Oval Office — after decades of speculation and conspiracy theories about each of the slayings. President Kennedy was assassinated in November 1963 in Dallas — with Lee Harvey Oswald, the primary suspect, himself being shot dead two days later by Jack Ruby…  RFK was shot dead by Sirhan Sirhan, a Palestinian Christian, in June 1968 — shortly after winning California’s Democratic presidential contest. King was fatally shot in April 1968 by James Earl Ray after federal authorities worked to undermine his anti-racial discrimination advocacy.”

Biden’s Disgraceful Preemptive Pardons

Deutsche Welle reported on January 20:

“In his final hours in office, US President Joe Biden has pardoned Dr. Anthony Fauciretired General Mark Milley and members of the House committee members [including Liz Cheney] that investigated the January 6 attack on the Capitol.”

The New York Post wrote on January 20:

“Outgoing President Biden on Monday issued a slew of pardons for more kin, including a broad, 11-year granting of clemency for his brother James — effectively killing any chance of repercussions for the first family’s influence-peddling. The 11th-hour move — on the heels of Biden’s previous unprecedented sweeping pardon of son Hunter — brought widespread condemnation, even from hardcore liberals.”

CNN added on January 20:

“The pardons, coming in the final hours of Biden’s presidency, amount to a stunning flex of presidential power that is unprecedented in recent presidential history…”

Biden must have felt preemptive pardons were necessary to protect his brother and other Biden family members from prosecution, (as well as Cheney, Fauci and Milley), based on their alleged criminal conduct.

Fauci’s Pardon!

The Washington Examiner wrote on January 20:

“President Joe Biden, in an extraordinary move, granted former federal health official Anthony Fauci a preemptive pardon. While Fauci faces criticism for all sorts of things — mostly pushing localities and institutions into overly strict lockdowns and unending mask mandates — he might have been in legal trouble because it looks like [he] tried to cover up the origins of COVID-19, and his own agency’s involvement with the Chinese research on coronaviruses.

“Specifically, Fauci, who ran the infectious-disease operation of the National Institutes of Health, could have faced prosecution for lying to Congress, which is a federal crime…”

Obviously, Fauci would have been in legal trouble… otherwise, why a pardon? In addition, he should be in all kinds of trouble for his terrible and unconscionable conduct in regard to the governmental coronavirus measures.

Putin Slaughters Deer to Bathe in Their Blood

Daily Mail wrote on January 18:

“Vladimir Putin is rumoured to have taken a secret break this week at his bolthole mountain palace where he ‘bathes in the blood of young deer’ ahead of anticipated talks with incoming U.S. president Trump. The 72-year-old dictator is fanatical about using ancient remedies to prolong his life and give him strength, say reports.

“His ‘Flying Kremlin’ Ilyushin 96-300 – equivalent to Air Force One – disappeared from radar screens over the remote Altai region in Siberia… Telegram channel ‘More Than Fact’ suggested Putin may have spent time at his sprawling Altai Courtyard retreat in neighbouring region Altai Republic. This Siberian palace is reported to have a vast underground hi-tech bunker with its own power station…

“It was reported last year that sufficient quantities of food had been stashed here to feed up to 300 people ‘for several years’. The eerie complex includes a maral deer farm where antlers are sawn off terrified Siberian stags so Putin and his inner circle can take blood baths, according to previous investigative reports. The ancient tradition is seen as a testosterone-driven elixir to improve male potency, but also as bringing multiple health benefits and slowing the ageing process….”

This is just SICK. For more on animal cruelty, please view our recent sermon, titled, “Does the Bible Condemn Animal Cruelty?”   

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News

Ending the Civil War in Syria?

Breitbart wrote on January 10:

“Leaders in Syrian Kurdistan asked the United States this week to provide protective troops and become more involved in keeping the peace as they face an ongoing campaign by Turkish proxy forces to eradicate them. One senior leader… suggested American troops, with French help, could ‘secure the entire border’ between Turkey and Syria. The top commander of the U.S.-allied, Kurdish-run Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), Gen. Mazloum Abdi, also said in an interview on Thursday that American forces could be the ‘key factor of stabilization’ in northern Syria.

“Syria endured a decade-long period of civil war under ousted dictator Bashar Assad that began in 2011 and, by late 2024, had reached a point of apparent stagnation. The al-Qaeda offshoot jihadist organization Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) staged a surprise attack on Aleppo in late November, shocking the Assad regime and resulted in a string of victories as a result of the collapse of the Syrian military. By early December, HTS reached the outskirts of Damascus; Assad himself is believed to have fled the country between December 7 and 8.

“At the same time that HTS solidified control and became the de facto government of Syria, the Syrian National Army (SNA) launched a campaign to destroy the SDF called ‘Operation Dawn of Freedom.’ The SNA is… largely considered a proxy force for the Turkish government. The SDF is a Kurdish-led coalition with close ties to the United States that played a major role in the dismantling of the Islamic State ‘caliphate’ headquartered in Syria in 2017.

“The Turkish government considers the Syrian People’s Protection Units (YPG/YPJ), the heart of the SDF, terrorist organizations indistinguishable from the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PPK), a U.S.-designated terrorist organization. The disagreement over cooperating with the Syrian Kurds has caused a rift that could potentially pit Turkey and America, NATO allies, against each other… During a press conference in December, Trump described the fall of Assad as an ‘unfriendly takeover’ by Turkey and hinted that Turkey itself could pose a threat to American forces in Syria

“… Erdogan and his officials threatened the SDF again on Friday, describing them as ‘separatist terrorists’ and threatening them with a ‘bitter end.’…”

Time to Expel Turkey From NATO

Israel 365 News wrote on January 12:

“I’m not sure what the rationale was for bringing an Islamist nation with expansionist goals and a vision of creating a revised Ottoman caliphate into NATO to begin with. Still, if it ever made sense, it no longer does.  It’s time to expel Turkey from NATO

“Turkish fingerprints are all over the fall of the Assad regime in Syria by arming and supporting the jihadi terrorists that now control much of Syria. What would happen if Russia or Iran sought to regain their lost influence by taking military action against Turkey? Would NATO members need to defend that?  What if Turkey’s growing occupation of Syria puts its targeting of the US-backed Kurdish community in jeopardy and in the crosshairs of the US? Could it trigger a war by Turkey attacking US allies, in which the US is obligated under NATO to defend Turkey? 

“What if the newfound Turkish influence in and occupation of Syria brings it to direct conflict with Israel, as Turkish President Erdogan had threatened multiple times, and is now physically closer and able to implement through its neo-Ottoman land bridge?  Will NATO be forced to confront Israel if Israel were to attack Turkey to defend itself?…

“Growing signs that Israel must prepare for a potential war were addressed in the recent report of Israel’s Nagel Committee to assess the growing risk of a direct armed conflict with Turkey. The report highlights ‘Turkey’s ambitions to reclaim Ottoman-era influence, posing a threat that could surpass even the Iranian challenge’…  

“A military confrontation between Turkey and Israel would be unprecedented, whether intentional or not. Israel, which is still in the midst of a war on multiple fronts and with an Iranian threat still looming, still dealing with the trauma of the Hamas massacre and ensuing war, will not tolerate additional threats. Were Erdogan to take aggressive military action, Israel would be hard-pressed not to respond forcefully. A war with Turkey would be shocking and unprecedented but not impossible…

“For all these and other reasons, whether it’s expelling Turkey from NATO or scrapping NATO and creating NATO 2.0 excluding Turkey, the status quo cannot remain…”

Turkey will collaborate with Europe AGAINST Israel and the USA.

The Hostage Deal

The Jerusalem Post wrote on January 14:

“Israel’s agreement to the emerging hostage deal —one that, if fully implemented, could secure the release of all 96 remaining captives, both living and dead, in exchange for thousands of Palestinian security prisoners, including convicted terrorist murderers serving life sentences – marks a triumph of the heart over the head.

“The deal would also see Israel withdrawing to a buffer zone along Gaza’s perimeter, relinquishing control over key areas such as the Netzarim Crossing and, in stages, the Philadelphi Corridor, while allowing Gazan civilians to return to northern Gaza and effectively bringing the war to an end with a long-term truce.

“… Leading with the heart means placing empathy, intuition, and moral values at the forefront… Those who have been pushing with full force for a hostage deal have indeed emphasized empathy…  Saving the lives of the hostages and reuniting them with their families is… seen as an expression of the solidarity and mutual responsibility…

“By contrast, leading with the head prioritizes logic, reason, strategy, and long-term consequences over emotions… Those opposed to the deal are not cold individuals with hearts of stone; rather, they are looking beyond the now and the individual and judging the agreement based on whether it is good in the long term and for the collective…

“First, the deal will incentivize hostage-taking… Second, releasing thousands of Hamas terrorists, hundreds with blood on their hands, will inevitably lead to more terrorism… The final concern is that Hamas remains standing… it still retains control of Gaza’s civilian infrastructure and is left in place under the agreement. It is only a matter of time… before the terrorist organization regroups and rearms

“The joy of seeing hostages reunited with their families will be profound, but the strategic ramifications will echo far beyond this moment… The national sense of relief if and when the agreement is finalized will be real and palpable, but the true cost of that moment may only be fully reckoned many years from now.”

What It All Entails

The New York Post wrote on January 15:

“The breakthrough deal is the first of its kind in more than a year. It will create a 42-day cease-fire in the… Palestinian territory. The pause in fighting will allow Israel and the terror group Hamas to negotiate the terms to release the 97 hostages remaining in Gaza. Only 60 hostages are believed to be alive, including three Americans…

“The first day of the cease-fire is expected to see the freedom of three hostages as a sign of goodwill and compliance. After that, another four hostages will be released on the seventh day of the cease-fire, with further releases happening every week as agreed to by both parties…

“Should the first phase be completed, Hamas and Israel will continue the cease-fire to negotiate the terms to release all the remaining living hostages in exchange for Israel’s complete withdrawal from Gaza. 

“The terms of the second phase remain the most contentious as Israel has repeatedly said it would not leave the Gaza Strip until Hamas is completely eradicated. The terror group has said it would not release every hostage until it sees proof that Israel is out of all sectors of the Palestinian territory.

“Should Israel and Hamas reach an agreement on the second phase, the war will end with the bodies of the remaining hostages returned in exchange for a three- to five-year reconstruction plan to rebuild Gaza.  The reconstruction would be carried out under international supervision, with the future governance of Gaza still in the air as Israel maintains that Hamas can no longer be the de facto leader of the territory.”

Why Is Trump Pushing Israel Toward a Bad Deal?

Israel Hayom wrote on January 15:

“According to senior Israeli officials, Trump’s rigid expectation for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to finalize a deal before his presidential inauguration is what compelled Netanyahu to accept the current framework…

“Hamas, despite suffering substantial losses, stands to receive at least 1,000 new operatives directly from Israeli prisons. This influx of ‘new blood’ – both figuratively and literally – is likely to reignite violence within Gaza and potentially beyond its borders…  Israel… is repeating a historically proven mistake, as mass releases of prisoners have consistently triggered waves of renewed terror…

“The newly freed operatives are expected to quickly integrate into Hamas’s extensive network across Judea and Samaria, Gaza, Qatar, and Turkey, from where they will likely orchestrate new attacks. This scenario is comparable to the United States allowing Guantanamo detainees to disperse along its borders with Canada and Mexico a year after 9/11, or permitting them to join Taliban forces against US troops in Afghanistan – a notion that defies strategic logic.

“Furthermore, the Hamas deal encompasses a substantial increase in the flow of goods and fuel into Gaza, bolstering the group’s military and economic capabilities…

“Paradoxically, it is now Trump who is pressuring Netanyahu to accept a framework designed in May 2024 under the Biden administration…”

How Biden and His Administration Suppressed the Truth

Breitbart wrote on January 10:

“Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg told Joe Rogan in an interview published Friday that ‘people in the Biden administration’ pushed Meta ‘super hard’ to censor users who were posting ‘true’ information about the coronavirus vaccines.

“‘These people from the Biden administration would call up our team and scream at them and curse,’ Zuckerberg said [and that] he felt censorship on his platforms ‘hit the most extreme’ during ‘the Biden administration, when they were trying to roll out the vaccine program [and that] they also tried to censor anyone who was basically arguing against it… They basically pushed us and said, “Anything that says that vaccines might have side effects, you basically need to take down.”’

“Zuckerberg added that there were instances in which Meta refused to take down ‘humor and satire,’ resulting in President Joe Biden accusing Meta of ‘killing people’… ‘And then all these different agencies and branches of government basically started investigating and coming after our company,’ Zuckerberg said.”

Why did it take Zuckerberg so long to come forward with admitting these well-known facts of Biden’s censorship?

Biden Awards Pope Francis the Presidential Medal of Freedom

Vatican News reported on January 10:

“President Joe Biden conferred the Presidential Medal of Freedom with Distinction—the nation’s highest civilian honor—upon Pope Francis… recognizing his dedication to peace, human rights, care for the poor, and environmental protection.

“This marks the second time a Pope has received the Presidential Medal of Freedom. On June 4, 2004, President George W. Bush presented the award to Pope John Paul II during a Vatican visit, recognizing his tireless advocacy for peace and human dignity.”

Breitbart added on January 12:

“Mr. Biden also conferred the medal on leftwing billionaire disrupter George Soros, a Nazi collaborator, promoter of open borders, and ‘anti-Catholic bigot.’ According to the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, ‘George Soros has done more to destroy western civilization and the United States, in particular, than any single person in the world… his anti-law enforcement policies have impoverished and punished legions of innocent black Americans…’

“President Biden, whom the media describes as ‘deeply Catholic,’ also granted the award to Cecile Richards, the former president of Planned Parenthood… Cecile Richards reportedly presided over the deaths of 3.9 million babies by abortion.”

Another downer for the “Presidential Medal of Freedom with Distinction,” bestowed by a “good Catholic” on the pope.  No further comments.

Hollywood Celebrities Blast Newsom

The New York Post wrote on January 9:

“Big Hollywood names have started to turn on Los Angeles’ Democratic leadership… Actress Sarah Michelle Gellar led the charge, criticizing the Democratic leadership on Instagram for failing to direct the tens of thousands of Southern California residents trying to flee as the fires burned uncontained Wednesday. ‘City of LA you want everyone to evacuate yet you have complete gridlock and not one traffic cop on the roads helping,’ Gellar wrote…

Actor James Woods, who lost his home in the Palisades Fire, vented on X that the wildfires weren’t caused by ‘climate change’ but by ‘liberal idiots like Gavin Newsom and [LA major] Karen Bass.’ ‘One doesn’t understand the first thing about fire management and the other can’t fill the water reservoirs,’ he added…

“Actress Sara Foster also took to X to lament how Los Angeles residents pay exorbitant taxes but the state was still completely unprepared to take on such massive wildfires. ‘Our fire hydrants were empty. Our vegetation was overgrown, brush not cleared. Our reservoirs were emptied by our governor because tribal leaders wanted to save fish. Our fire department budget was cut by our mayor…’ The politically active actress, who is the daughter of music mogul David Foster, called on Bass and Gov. Gavin Newsom to resign, writing, ‘your far left policies have ruined our state. And also our party.’

“Former ‘Dancing with the Stars’ professional dancer Valentin Chmerkovskiy also vented his frustrations over the state’s lack of preparedness, writing on social media Wednesday, ‘5th largest economy on the planet. Firefighters didn’t have enough water pressure to do their jobs?! Are you joking me?! The taxes we pay for 3rd world infrastructure is unbelievable?! Come on.’

“‘Shazam!’ star and longtime Los Angeles resident Zachary Levi also ripped into Newsom and Bass for their handling of the crisis. ‘This is just incredible mismanagement, incredibly poor leadership. I would go so far as to saying that it’s criminally negligent because, I mean, Gavin Newsom has been either the governor for five years or lieutenant governor prior to that for eight, nine years, some of the worst fires we’ve ever had in California under that watch. He clearly knows that the biggest problem that we suffer in California are these fires. And, by the way, the mudslides that follow,’ Levi said. ‘And for them to do essentially not just nothing, but worse than nothing, when firefighter budgets are being cut… There is something that’s almost criminally intentional about this. Like, what are they doing? I don’t know.’”

Newsweek added on January 10:

“During an appearance on Thursday’s installment of The Joe Rogan Experience, actor Mel Gibson, who lives in Malibu, discussed the ‘inferno’ engulfing his neighborhood and other areas in and around Los Angeles… ‘The wildfire situation … How crazy it is that they spent $24 billion last year on the homeless, and what did they spend on preventing these wildfires? Zip,’ podcast host Joe Rogan said.

“Gibson then interjected by directly accusing Newsom of failing to ‘take care of the forest,’ while jokingly suggesting that the governor was spending all of California’s ‘tax dollars’ on his ‘hair gel.’ ‘In 2019, I think Newsom said, “You know, I’m going to take care of the forest and maintain the forest, all of that kind of stuff,”’ said Gibson. ‘He didn’t do anything…’

“Gibson [argued] that Newsom was responsible for San Francisco supposedly becoming ‘apocalyptic’ and ‘a mess’ because homeless people live there before suggesting that civilization itself might soon ‘cave in and collapse.’”

Breitbart wrote on January 12:

“Veteran actor and singer Robert Davi has gone nuclear on California leaders for their catastrophic mismanagement of the Los Angeles fires, saying California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) ‘should [be] thrown out of office’… In the case of stars like Dwayne Johnson and Arnold Schwarzenegger, Davi called on them to use their massive social media platforms to start speaking out about the failure of leadership that has plunged the state into chaos… ‘Actors are frighted to speak out. They’re frightened because of their jobs, they’re frighted of being black listed.’”

Trump also demanded that Newsom must resign. In fact, Newsom’s resignation is long overdue. It should already have occurred, if not much earlier, when Newsom’s hypocritical conduct during the Corona pandemic was revealed.

Major Pacific Palisades Reservoir Was Offline And Empty When Fires Broke Out

Mediaite wrote on January 10:

“The Los Angeles Times reported on Friday that a major reservoir in the Pacific Palisades was offline and empty this week when devastating wildfires ravaged the LA-area community. Staff reporter Matt Hamilton spoke to local officials who told ‘the Times that the Santa Ynez Reservoir had been closed [since about February] for repairs to its cover, leaving a 117 million gallon water storage complex empty in the heart of the Palisades.’

“The report added that the ‘revelation comes among growing questions about why firefighters ran out of water while battling the blaze. Numerous fire hydrants in higher-elevation streets of the Palisades went dry, leaving firefighters struggling with low water pressure as they combated the flames.’…

“The fires were fueled by high winds and dry conditions throughout the region. Storm chaser Colin McCarthy explained the perfect storm of events that led to the disastrous conditions that were not mitigated by local officials, writing that ‘after Los Angeles experienced its second-wettest two-year period on record. Since April, it has barely rained in Southern California, leaving the massive buildup of vegetation bone dry. Now, one of the strongest Santa Ana wind events in modern history is expected, with winds reaching up to 100 mph. This is essentially a worst-case scenario.’”

AFP added:

“But this explanation alone falls short for many Californians, thousands of whom have lost everything… Karen Bass, the city’s mayor, has come in for heavy criticism because she was visiting the African nation of Ghana when the fire started, despite dire weather warnings in the preceding daysBudget cuts to the fire department, and a series of evacuation warnings erroneously sent to millions of people this week, have only stoked the anger further.”

The New York Post added on January 12:

“Newsom on Sunday tried to play semantics and weasel out of blame by saying state reservoirs were ‘completely full’ when the LA fires broke out — even though a county-run reservoir had been drained at the time… Reporter Jacob Soboroff pressed Newsom on his response by pointing out how the LA-County-run Santa Ynez Reservoir was bone dry — something that even has prompted a probe from Newsom.”

What hypocrisy!

California’s Failing Leadership

The Editorial Board of the New York Post wrote on January 11:

“If only we were in charge, the liberals say, with unlimited money and unlimited power and unlimited resources, we would make the world a utopia. Such a place exists. It’s called California. And today, it is in ashes. With a Democratic governor, Democratic mayors, Democratic city councils and a Democratic justice system, the progressives have darkened the land of perpetual sunshine.

“Since 2019, the state has spent an astonishing $24 billion to ‘solve’ homelessnessHomelessness increased… Since enforcing the law is ‘racist,’ thieves are no longer prosecuted. Shoplifting increased 28%, and stores locked up the shampoo. Criminals are let go with no bail. Drug users are allowed to slowly kill themselves in public spaces…

“This week’s devastating wildfires are the pinnacle of Democratic incompetence. Environmentalists and politicians refused to clear the underbrush that fueled the flames. A reservoir in Pacific Palisades was shockingly closed for repair. With the forecast showing 100 mph Santa Ana winds, only three tankers of water were available there to keep the hydrants flowing…

“But Democrats have not just failed the fire department, or the people whose homes have burned. They have failed the 39 million residents of California.

Consider what they have wasted. California has the highest top income-tax bracket in the country, 13.3%. That’s just state taxes, on top of federal. It has the highest state sales tax in the nation, 7.25%. California brought in $17 billion more in tax revenue than it expected last year. It has a budget surplus of $363 million. They are swimming in money… California residents will rightly wonder: Where did all that money go?

“… Democrats have enjoyed one-party rule in California for far too long, and there is no one else to blame for what has happened. California is not paradise lost. California is paradise squandered…”

It has now been reported that “Los Angeles landlords are being accused of raising rents as the supply of homes in the Southern California metropolis drops amid the fires… rents are likely to increase around the areas hardest hit by the fires: Pacific Palisades and Altadena. Those seeking to rebuild will trigger a bidding war for contractors… the impact on the home insurance market [will] lead to increased costs for all Los Angeles residents” (Newsmax, dated January 12).

Shocking and appalling. Carnal human nature at its worst.

What Happened to the Money?

Breitbart wrote on January 12:

“Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D) reportedly awarded government workers with major wage increases before making cuts to the city’s fire department budget… Mayor Karen Bass’s budget cuts to the city’s fire department, enacted just months ago amid warnings about the city’s deteriorating finances, stand out as a striking example of misplaced priorities… The cuts stemmed from a budget crisis triggered by her administration’s decision to reward city employees with rich contracts and benefits—even as it dismissed worries that the reductions would hurt services…

“Bass… cut almost $20 million from the city’s budget for fire services for the current fiscal year…”

Incompetence and favoritism galore.  

The Fall of Gavin Newsom

The New York Post wrote on January 11:

“The smug and ambitious progressive California Governor whose political aspirations went up in flames as Los Angeles continues to burn to the ground, leaving a shocking number of residents’ lives in tatters. And it’s Newsom, who has become the arsonist, setting the fire to his political fortunes with a series of unforced errors — putting a cap on years of mismanagement and abandoning crucial infrastructure in favor of useless far left policies that made social justice and climate warriors feel all warm and fuzzy inside.

‘Since the inferno broke out, Newsom has shown that he’s ill-prepared and shameless: shifting blame to others

“As Pacific Palisades was ablaze, Anderson Cooper asked Newsom about the dry hydrant situation there. Instead of owning any failure:… ‘Look, the local folks are trying to figure that out,’ he told Cooper… This apocalyptic inferno wasn’t some freak accident in a backwater that no one could find on the map. This was Los Angeles, home to millions, and a city that remains under constant threat of wildfires.

“Then he cowardly tried to use a fake phone connection to brush off an anguished mother sifting through the rubble of her community…

“Newsom… is slick and handsome. But he is empty and incompetent…”

Advice for the Feds, the Media and the People

On January 13, Ron Paul wrote the following in his weekly column for the Ron Paul Institute:

“The Federal Reserve should… resolve to refrain from developing a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). A digital currency controlled by the Fed will give government new power to violate Americans’ financial privacy.

“The media should resolve to stop gaslighting the American people with misinformation. For example, the media should stop repeating the lie that a failure to raise the debt ceiling will lead to a government default on its debts. The truth is a refusal to raise the debt ceiling would force Congress to reduce present and future spending — just like most people do when they find themselves in debt. Another example of false news is that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was unrelated to the US supported 2014 coup in Ukraine and the breaking of the promise that if the Soviet Union withdrew from Eastern Europe the US would not support expanding NATO.

“Finally, those committed to the cause of liberty should resolve to increase their understanding of the benefits of liberty and the dangers of authoritarianism. This means… staying up to date with current events and trying to find the truth behind the lies of the mainstream media and the political class…”

Good advice!

Strange Plans for Trump’s Inauguration

The New York Post wrote on January 13:

“A Muslim cleric who refused to call Hezbollah a terrorist organization and has a ‘significant history of extremism’ has been tapped to deliver a benediction at President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration next [Monday]. Husham Al-Husainy…  is among four religious leaders listed in an Inauguration Day program… 

“The Middle East Forum, a conservative nonprofit focused on Islamic issues, has described Al-Husainy as ‘a radical anti-Semitic, pro-Hezbollah Shia imam’…”

Other religious leaders supposed to speak are Cardinal Timothy Dolan, Roman Catholic Archbishop of New York; Samuel Rodriguez, president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference; Paula White, a Florida televangelist; Marvin Hier, founder and dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center; Franklin Graham, son of Billy Graham; and Wayne T. Jackson who runs Great Faith Ministries International and Impact Television Network.

The Sentencing of Donald Trump

After Judge Merchan sentenced Trump to an “unconditional discharge” without any jail time or probation, a fine or community service, but still making him a ”felon,” the New York Post published on January 10 the following article by Professor Jonathan Turley:

“[This] is a damning indictment of the entire New York court system. [Judge Juan] Merchan allowed a dead misdemeanor to be resuscitated by allowing Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg to effectively prosecute declined federal offenses. He allowed a jury to convict Trump without any agreement, let alone unanimity, on what actually occurred in the case.

“Merchan ruled that the jury did not have to agree on why Trump committed an alleged offense [and what the alleged offense was] in describing settlement costs as legal costs. Neither the defendant nor the public will ever know what the jury ultimately found in its verdict…

“Even liberal legal experts have denounced the case…

“Now, Merchan seemed quick to assure this Frankenstein case was just like any other creature of the court. It did not matter that it was stitched together from dead cases and zapped into life through lawfare. Merchan knows that there is a fair chance this monstrosity will finally die on appeal

“The verdict, however, is likely to last far longer than the Trump verdict. It is a judgment against not just Merchan but the New York legal system, which allowed itself to be weaponized against political opponents. Trump can now appeal the case as a whole. Prior appeals in the New York court system were unsuccessful, and hopes are low that the system will redeem itself. However, Trump can eventually escape the vortex of the New York court system in search of jurists willing to see beyond the rage and bring reason to this case.

“Merchan’s monster will now go on the road and work its way back to the Supreme Court… Lawfare is that monster. It threatens us all, even those who hate Trump and his supporters. Once released, it spreads panic among the public, which can no longer rely on the guarantees of blind and fair justice. That includes businesses that view this case and the equally absurd civil case brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James as creating a dangerous and even lawless environment…”

With his conviction, unless overturned by a higher court, Trump cannot own a gun or reenter the casino business, nor hold a liquor license (but his golf courses and hotels won’t have to stop selling alcohol). Even though he is allowed to travel outside the USA, some countries, such as Canada, the UK and Israel, may prohibit him to visit (which is rather unlikely). As he is registered to vote in Florida, he will still be able to vote there. He can also, of course, hold a federal office (This might be different from state or local offices).

On the federal level, special counsel Jack Smith cowardly resigned from the DOJ after losing his two cases against Trump. That resignation had been widely expected to preempt his humiliating termination after Trump’s inauguration.   

Jack Smith’s Phony Report

The New York Post wrote on January 14:

“Special counsel Jack Smith’s report, which concluded that Donald Trump made a ‘criminal effort’ to overturn the 2020 election, was ‘a partisan effort at lawfare’ against the president-elect, a constitutional lawyer said… Attorney Katie Cherkasky dismissed the 174-page document as ‘nothing more than a prosecution on paper.’ ‘It’s every prosecutor’s dream. You have no rebuttal, you have no cross-examination. You don’t actually have to prove this case,’ she told Fox News…

“Cherkasky said it was a ‘shame’ that the report was ever released…”

We agree. Jack Smith’s and the DOJ’s lawsuit was a hoax from the beginning, designed to defeat Trump in the election… but their plan terribly backfired for them. Now Smith says Trump would have been convicted if Smith had been able to move forward. With our corrupt court system, who knows… But according to the Bible, you would need two witnesses, subject to cross-examination, before you can convict someone.

Seizing Greenland?

The U.S. Sun wrote on January 9:

“VLADIMIR Putin has desperately hit back at Donald Trump after he refused to rule out using military action to potentially seize Greenland… Trump said that US ownership of Greenland is an ‘absolute necessity’ to protect global ‘national security and freedom’…

“[Putin’s] mouthpiece, Dmitry Peskov, attempted to push Russia’s influence over the Arctic region in a desperate warning when asked about the incoming US leader’s remarks. ‘The Arctic is a zone of our national interests, our strategic interests,’ he said. ‘We are watching this rather dramatic development of the situation very closely,’ Peskov added…

“An attempt to take over the resource-rich island for national security reasons might not be as mad as it sounds. Greenland sits right in the middle of the Arctic Ocean and is among the key trade routes in the region. The Arctic has increasingly become the object of a struggle between international superpowers as Russia and China have both ramped up efforts to take control of the area. Putin, whose nation owns around 40 per cent of the Arctic coastline, has been particularly proactive in cranking up military moves. The Kremlin has started building the world’s largest fleet of nuclear icebreakers to open up new shipping routes.

“Russia has not been the only country to send a warning Trump’s way after several major EU nations spoke out. Both Germany and France made surprise warnings to the president-elect against using force to possibly take the ice island. French foreign minister Jean-Noel Barrot suggested moves on the territory would be an attack on the European Union… German chancellor Olaf Scholz said Trump’s remarks triggered ‘incomprehension’ among European leaders…

“Trump also oddly put out potential plans for the US to retake control of the Panama Canal, change the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, and make Canada the 51st state. He called the border between Canada and the US an ‘artificially drawn line.’”

Germany did not occupy Greenland during World War II. However, the Nazis established weather stations in Greenland during World War II, planning to use them in a possible invasion of the USA. The United States and its allies intervened to prevent the Nazis from gaining control of the island. The United States occupied Greenland in 1941 to prevent Germany from using the island. That kind of rationale could be used again in the future; this time in light of a threat from Russia or China. Note the next article.

Not a Crazy Idea?

Newsmax wrote on January 12:

“President-elect Donald Trump has said the importance of Greenland to national and global security cannot be overstated and former NATO supreme allied commander James Stavridis agreed… ‘It’s not a crazy idea,’ Stavridis [said]. ‘We could do an awful lot in terms of business, investment, box out the Russians, box out the Chinese, and work very closely with Greenland.’

“The former NATO commander called the large Arctic island a ‘strategic goldmine for the United States… It sits at the very top of the North Atlantic; it protects approaches to our own country… It’s geographically very important. It’s full of strategic minerals, rare earth, probably a lot of gold. It’s got a lot of natural resources…’

“For skeptics refusing to listen to Trump’s logic, Stavridis reminded all to just listen to Greenland and its people. ‘The prime minister of Greenland said, “We are not for sale, but we are open for business” – I think we ought to take him at his word,’ Stavridis said of Premier Múte Egede… Regardless of forging a deal to bring Greenland under U.S. control from Denmark, the Greenlanders say they are at least ready for independence. ‘Greenland is for the Greenlandic people,’ Egede said Friday. ‘We do not want to be Danish, we do not want to be American. We want to be Greenlandic.’ Egede added he is ‘ready’ to talk to Trump on a deal.”

Denmark Ready for Concessions?

The New York Post wrote on January 12:

“Danish leaders have sent private messages to President-elect Donald Trump’s team in recent days in a bid to pacify his ambitions for taking over Greenland…  Copenhagen is allegedly open to allowing US military presence on the autonomous island to boost security and appease Trump… The Danish government, which is responsible for Greenland’s defense, wants to avoid clashing with the US and hopes to assure Trump that Greenland will be safe from Russia and China without the need for American annexation…

“Copenhagen has also asked Trump’s team to clarify the incoming president’s comments after he shocked the world by suggesting that the US could invade the longstanding NATO ally… Denmark was widely seen as America’s closest ally in the European Union, and… no one could have imagined it’d be the first Trump would pick a fight with.

Greenland had been a colony of Denmark since the 18th century and became a self-governing Danish territory in 1953… The US already has a military base on Greenland and has had a defense agreement in place since 1951, which would make it easy to increase American troops on the island.”

What Europe would do in case of an American invasion is still open to debate. Europe is afraid of this, as it knows that at this point they are no match for the USA. But note the next article.

Easy to Take?

The Sun wrote on January 11:

“DONALD Trump could storm Greenland and claim it within 24 hours in the ‘world’s shortest war’, professor Anthony Glees [has] revealed… Greenland – the largest non-continent island in the world – has a population of just 57,000, and virtually no defensive capabilities of its own… As owner of the island, Denmark is responsible for Greenland’s protection and their army would be the army to mobilise against the Americans. Its defence budget is around £6billion – 100 times smaller than the eye watering almost £750billion America splashes on defence… There are only 17,000 active Danish troops, and most of the country’s heavy military equipment has been donated to Ukraine – so their defences are even thinner than usual.

“Some Danish coastguards man south-eastern Greenland, but the Danish press has reported that software needed to shoot at targets was never bought – rendering the patrols toothless… Denmark’s best hope of defending against the Americans would be to prove that the EU or Nato had a legal requirement to step in and protect Greenland…

“Ulrik Pram Gad, a senior researcher at the Danish Institute for International Studies, [said] that ‘there is no defensive capacity in Greenland’… The US has a nuclear base on the island that is constantly manned by troops…

“Glees said it was likely that, in the event of a US invasion, ‘there would be no military response to it, because it is unthinkable that any Nato member would attack the US... There would have to be a response of sorts, and Article 5 of Nato would bind the rest of us to support Denmark in whatever non-military measures it took to try to get the Americans out. This could take the form of “economic sanctions”, but “Trump would shrug them off,”’ Glees said…

“Trump’s threats could have ‘profound consequences’ for Europe… My opinion is, he is making a disastrous miscalculation there. No country, however powerful it is, can walk alone in the world. The idea of a fortress America, it sounds good – but it has never worked in the past. An isolated America is a vulnerable America…’”

America WILL become isolated, as Europe will be forced to become more unified and stronger militarily. And ultimately, they WILL attack the USA.

Many Americans Support Trump’s Suggestions Regarding Greenland and Panama Canal

Newsmax wrote on January 14:

More than two-thirds of Republican voters support President-elect Donald Trump’s suggestion the U.S. acquire Greenland and/or the Panama Canal, according to a new Rasmussen Reports survey. When asked whether they support or oppose the U.S. taking back the Panama Canal, 73% of GOP voters say they support the move. That includes 51% who say they strongly support the action. When asked whether they support or oppose the U.S. purchasing Greenland, 70% of GOP voters say they support the move. That includes 45% who say they strongly support it.

“Among Democrat voters, only 23% say they support buying Greenland, and 22% say they support reclaiming the Panama Canal. Among voters unaffiliated with either major party, 40% say they back purchasing Greenland, and 43% say they support taking back the Panama Canal.”

This plan is not going away soon or easily.

The “Make Greenland Great Again Act”

Reuters wrote on January 13:

“President-elect Donald Trump’s Republican allies in the U.S. House of Representatives are trying to build support for a bill on authorizing talks for the purchase of Greenland according to a copy of the bill circulated for co-sponsors on Monday. …The bill [introduced by Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.)] is called ‘Make Greenland Great Again Act’…

“The bill, if passed, will allow the president to enter into negotiations with Denmark [‘to secure the acquisition of Greenland’] by the United States on Jan. 20, when Trump takes office…”

Axios added on January 13:

“It’s the latest in a series of proposed Republican legislation… Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) last week introduced a bill that would have the Gulf of Mexico renamed the ‘Gulf of America’ on official documents and maps. Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.) also introduced a bill last week along with 15 other Republicans that would authorize talks to repurchase the Panama Canal… The bill would give Congress the ability to block any agreement within 60 days, though it would need a veto-proof two-thirds majority in both chambers to do so…

To be approved by Congress, the bill would almost certainly need Democratic support… But some centrist Democrats aren’t ruling out working with Trump on the idea, noting the geopolitical importance of both territories (Panama and Greenland).”

The Fight Between USA and Europe Has Begun

The Guardian wrote on January 11:

“Europe has been braced since the US presidential election in November for the challenge posed by Donald Trump’s return, but the threat to European stability has come earlier and appears far more serious than predicted, even by the pessimists.

“Trump has already revived his territorial aspirations for Greenland… Meanwhile Trump’s financial backer and confidant Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, has been using his ownership of the X social media platform to aggressively further the cause for far-right parties in Europe, threatening the continent with the realisation of its ultimate nightmare, the return of fascism, this time abetted from Washington.

“… the fallout from Trump’s territorial ambitions is felt most keenly in Europe. Capitals are in a dilemma over how to respond, torn between outrage over the blatant interference in favour of extremists, and anxiety over becoming a focus for Trump and Musk’s personal grievances.

“At stake is not just a looming transatlantic trade war… Ukraine and European security are also in the balance. European leaders and diplomats know the war in Ukraine has entered a new phase in which… he decides whether to continue to supply US weaponry to Ukraine…

‘Denmark, a Nato ally, has been plunged into a political crisis by Trump’s stated intention to acquire Greenland, and the threat to impose tariffs if he is thwarted. Amid a flurry of emergency meetings with the king and Greenlandic leaders, the Danish government has been careful in the wording of the response…

“The European dilemma is even more complex with Musk… Musk has used X as a megaphone to promote the far-right Alternative für Deutschland party, claiming: ‘Only the AfD can save Germany’. In a… conversation with… Alice Weidel, on Thursday, Musk showered her with praise. It was a direct challenge to the efforts of Germany’s mainstream parties to quarantine the AfD and exclude it from power, in the run-up to crucial elections on 23 February…

“For the UK – outside the EU and traditionally more beholden to the relationship with Washington – the response to provocations from Trump and Musk has been just as tentative. Musk has become preoccupied with calling for the British prime minister, Keir Starmer, to be sacked, for a far-right extremist, Tommy Robinson, to be released from jail, and spreading hard-right Islamophobic propaganda to the point, it was reported on Friday, that his social media posts were monitored by the security services…

“‘On the eve of a second Trump term, the United States and Europe have rarely appeared so at odds,’ a group of European foreign policy experts wrote in the Foreign Affairs Journal…”

The left-wing rhetoric of this left-wing outlet notwithstanding, it does show the growing alienation between the USA and Europe.

German and Austrian Institutions Depart From X

Deutsche Welle reported on January 9:

“Scores of universities and research institutions in Germany and Austria on Friday announced their intention to drop their presence on the online messaging platform X… The planned withdrawal in the academic sphere comes as the German government says it is also considering leaving the platform because it was having an ‘agitated and polarizing’ effect on public political discussion.

“On Thursday, the trade unions GEW, which represents educators and teachers, and Verdi announced they were deleting their X presence, as did the Federal Court of Justice (BGH).”

Breitbart added on January 15:

“The German Defence Ministry announced that it will no longer actively post on Elon Musk’s X social media site amid growing calls to censor the platform in Europe…”

This will hurt them more than Musk.

“Germany Sets Up Military Division Dedicated to Territorial Defence”

Reuters wrote on January 11:

“The German military will establish a new division tasked exclusively with territorial defence, the army said on Saturday, bringing all existing reserve units under direct army command. The reorganization will take effect in April and raise the number of German divisions – units of some 20,000 troops – to four without increasing the total number of around 180,000 soldiers in the German forces…

“The Western military alliance NATO is at its highest alert stage since the Cold War, with its more pessimistic officials, including German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius, saying that an attack by Russia on its borders could happen within four years. The German move will streamline command structures in territorial defence at a time when what Berlin describes as acts of Russian sabotage against the country’s critical infrastructure have reached a new high…

“So far, Berlin has three divisions that NATO can call upon in case of a conflict, whose main job will be defending the alliance by confronting an adversary right at the front lines. The fourth division will be tasked with Germany’s defence at home, including the protection of infrastructure such as ports, railways and supply and deployment routes.

“Germany is gearing up for its role as major logistics hub in any conflict with Moscow, with tens of thousands of reinforcement troops from other NATO allies expected to be deployed east through Germany after arriving at its North Sea ports.”

Why this sudden move towards German military power? 

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in

This Week in the News

Face Mask Mandates Return!!!!

The Daily Mail wrote on January 2:

“The surge in infections is prompting a return of mask mandates in some states, with a hospital system in Wisconsin this week becoming the latest to reinstate them. Hospitals in parts of California, Illinois, Indiana, and New Jersey have also brought back the rules for staff and visitors. Officials in New York City are urging people to consider wearing a face mask on public transport

“The unusual surge in norovirus cases may in part be linked to an outbreak in Los Angeles, with at least 80 people sickened after eating raw oysters tainted with norovirus at a restaurant…”

When you thought the nonsense of ineffective face masks had passed…

The Terror Attack in Las Vegas

The Daily Mail wrote on January 2:

“Donald Trump has broken his silence on the Tesla Cybertruck explosion outside his Las Vegas hotel…  He wrote in a post: ‘Our Country is a disaster, a laughing stock all over the World! This is what happens when you have OPEN BORDERS, with weak, ineffective, and virtually nonexistent leadership. 

‘The DOJ, FBI, and Democrat state and local prosecutors have not done their job. They are incompetent and corrupt, having spent all of their waking hours unlawfully attacking their political opponent, ME, rather than focusing on protecting Americans from the outside and inside violent SCUM that has infiltrated all aspects of our government, and our Nation itself. ‘Democrats should be ashamed of themselves for allowing this to happen to our Country… The USA is breaking down – A violent erosion of Safety, National Security, and Democracy is taking place all across our Nation.’”

If the DOJ, FBI, and Democrat state and local prosecutors are incompetent and corrupt, as Trump says, how COULD we even think for a moment that their investigation and conclusions are in any way reliable and trustworthy?

Everything Is Strange About Trump Hotel Bomber

Report 24 wrote on January 3:

“The story presented to the public about the bombing of the Trump Hotel in Las Vegas could not be stranger or more unbelievable. The 37-year-old military specialist from the Green Berets (Special Operations Command, 10th Special Forces Group), Matthew Livelsberger, drove the vehicle in front of the hotel on January 1, 2025. There he killed himself with a shot in the head, after which the Cybertruck’s cargo – fireworks and gasoline – exploded… Of all people, such a professional is said to have planned and carried out such a botched attack? And he is said to have killed himself with a shot in the head before he even knew whether his attack was successful?…

“… the alleged perpetrator’s uncle, Dean Livelsberger… told The Independent that Matthew’s skills could have reduced the entire hotel to rubble if he had wanted to…

Three attackers in recent months have an intense relationship with a US Army base, the Fort Bragg Army Military Base. New Orleans mass murderer Shamsud Din Jabbar, who carried out his terror spree on the same day, served at the same facility. And Ryan Routh, who waited in the bushes at the next US President Trump’s golf club with a rifle in his hand in order to assassinate him, is said to have visited this same military base a hundred times. Is it all coincidences?

Another coincidence is that the New Orleans murder vehicle was rented from the same company as the Cybertruck used in the Las Vegas attack – via the Turo app…

“But how does it fit into the picture that Livelsberger… carried several forms of identification (passport, military ID, credit cards) with him when he committed the crime? Was he planning a stay abroad?… The sources for the clear identification of the dead man in the Cybertruck are unclear. Some sources claim that DNA identification has already been carried out… Many point out that it is extremely strange that the man was burned and charred beyond recognition – to the extent that even his teeth could not be used for identification – but his ID cards survived the inferno of the battery fire….

“The suspected Cybertruck bomber is said to have sent an email on December 31, 2024… in which he claimed that he had been being followed by the FBI or Homeland Security for a week…. Livelsberger further claimed that he had collected material about war crimes committed by US authorities in Afghanistan in 2019. He claimed that he had been involved in targeting for these military strikes; that hundreds of civilians had been killed in one day; that the US government covered up these actions; and that he himself had been involved in the cover-up.”

The Resurgence of IS

The Guardian wrote on January 4:

“The (IS) threat on the US homeland has caused renewed concern… In a rare public acknowledgment, the CIA director, Bill Burns, recently described IS as ‘resurgent’, a description now underscored by political chaos in Syria.

“Since the summer, IS propaganda has steadily called for American targets to be ‘next’… On Rocket.Chat, the chosen encrypted communications platform of IS… one user left a YouTube link on carjacking with the message: ‘For the brothers interested in stealing a car and using it in the next attacks.’… In 2024 alone, at least five plots linked to [Is]– both inspired and directed – have been thwarted within the United States… Manuals and social media posts emanating from IS or its predecessor organization, al-Qaida, have long advised the use of car ramming attacks

“As far back as 2010, an al-Qaida magazine called on followers to use trucks…  It is unclear if Jabbar was a bona fide IS operative or merely a follower who engaged with the terror group’s vast online archive… Now US law enforcement and intelligence officials face the difficult task of wading through the potential onslaught of copycats or would-be IS supporters who might try to replicate the same type of operation…”

The Mystery Drone Frenzy Continues

The Associated Press wrote on January 3:

“The mystery drone frenzy that seemed to have faded over the holidays may come back with a bang after the New Jersey phenomenon was linked to the Tesla Cybertruck blast at the Trump hotel in Las Vegas. In a Dec. 31 email that the FBI believes was likely written by the Army soldier who died in the Jan. 1 explosion, Matthew Livelsberger, 37, says the drones in New Jersey were being operated by China… He says ‘China has been launching them from the Atlantic from submarines for years, but this activity recently has picked up.’..

“The development from Las Vegas comes as the FAA expands drone restrictions over New Jersey. The FAA added 34 locations to its Temporary Flight Restrictions list on Dec. 24 and Dec. 30 for ‘special security reasons.’ The list now has 57 locations… The FBI, which is leading the investigation into the drone sightings, had no comment…

“The additions are of concern to former Pequannock Mayor Ryan Herd who ended 8 years in office on New Year’s Day. The Republican said he believes that interest in drones has ebbed as the public’s attention turned to the holidays and the terrorist incidents in New Orleans and Las Vegas… ‘I think we’ve come a little accustomed to it, so people are seeing it, but they’re not reporting it. Or that’s why they’re not reporting it because it’s kind of a nightly occurrence,’ Herd said…”

The Shocking Story of the Chinese Spy Balloon

National Post wrote on January 6:

“Photographs of the balloon… soon were buzzing around the world. After four days of silence, their images had prompted U.S. military officials to divulge the shocking truth — what those pilots and photographers had spotted was a Chinese surveillance balloon… And it was now floating across some of the most militarily sensitive sites in America — nuclear-missile silos that would be among an enemy’s earliest targets should atomic war ever break out.

“The spy balloon’s slow traverse over Alaska, Western Canada and the continental United States, ending when it was shot down off the coast of South Carolina, riveted the world, sparked heated political debate and touched off a diplomatic uproar… It was quickly followed by the appearance of three more unidentified flying objects over Canada and the United States. That led to the first ever shoot-down by American fighter jets in Canadian airspace, after this country’s aging CF-18 fighters were grounded by freezing rain…

“Questions about why the Chinese balloon was not taken out sooner, or its presence made public earlier, persist… American intelligence agencies warned… in August 2022 that China had in place a program of high-altitude surveillance craft and was deploying the airships around the globe… Later news reports, quoting unnamed American government sources, suggest it had been tracked all the way from the balloon’s launch in Hainan Island, China

“The balloon’s slow passage over Montana brought it close to Malmstrom Air Force Base and its array of silos, which harbour a major chunk of America’s arsenal of intercontinental ballistic missiles. China admitted it owned the balloon, but insisted it was an errant weather station. No one was convinced…

“U.S. authorities have been largely silent about what was learned from the debris that Navy units picked up in the following hours and days…

“Meanwhile, American jets had earlier destroyed a second balloon over Alaska and dispatched a third above Lake Huron on Feb. 12 near the border between Michigan and Ontario. The RCMP led a search for debris in the mountainous region where the Yukon floater went down, but called it off a week later, the terrain and weather making finding fragments all but impossible…”

Biden’s Departure Gift

Fox News wrote on January 5:

“If President Biden’s goal is to anger as many Americans as possible as he shuffles his way out the door, he’s absolutely exceeding these dubious expectations. Exhibit A is Biden’s (or whoever is running the White House in these waning days) decision to award the Presidential Medal of Freedom to election denier Hillary Clinton and George Soros, who has done more damage to the United States as a private citizen for many years than arguably anyone in the country…

“[This] comes not long after Biden gave a blanket pardon to his son, Hunter, after repeatedly promising not to do so. And after he awarded the Presidential Citizens Medal to Liz Cheney and… Bennie Thompson… for their work on the Jan. 6 Committee that barred cross-examination of any handpicked ‘witnesses.’ And for this part, in 2004, Thompson voted against the certification of the 2004 presidential election won by George W. Bush…

“Biden will exit as the most unpopular president we’ve seen in decades. And on his way to the exit, he’s devaluing once-special awards like the Presidential Medal of Freedom to the point they’re as worthless as his word itself…”

Further Biden Sabotage

npr wrote on January 6:

“President Biden is using a decades-old law to block drilling for oil in more than 625 million acres of U.S. ocean — the largest region a president has ever protected using this authority. It’s a move designed to help cement his climate legacy, and one the incoming Trump administration is expected to challenge… the region includes the eastern Gulf of Mexico, where oil companies are interested in expanding when an existing moratorium expires. And all together, the huge swathes of ocean set aside in this move… include more than a third of the offshore U.S. oil and gas that is likely economical to extract…

“The oil industry has objected to the moratorium… Green groups, meanwhile, celebrated the announcement…

“Biden’s move has no expiration date. And courts have previously found that makes the move essentially permanent... Courts found that the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act allows a president to protect waters indefinitely, and doesn’t include any provision for removing that protection…”

Fox News wrote on January 6:

“President-elect Donald Trump said he plans to immediately reverse President Biden’s new ban on offshore drilling along most of the U.S. coastline, but he faces major roadblocks under a 70-year, irrevocable law. Throughout his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump vowed that, if elected, he would expand oil and gas drilling in an effort to bolster American-made energy. However, Biden issued an 11th-hour executive order Monday morning to forestall such actions exactly two weeks before his term ends, announcing a permanent stop to most new oil and gas drilling across U.S. coastal and offshore waters… Trump would need congressional approval to reverse Biden’s decision…

“Biden said that his decision stemmed from his efforts to curb climate change – one of dozens of moves from the Democratic president’s green energy agenda… Trump’s spokeswoman, Karoline Leavitt, also issued a statement criticizing Biden’s order. ‘This is a disgraceful decision designed to exact political revenge on the American people who gave President Trump a mandate to increase drilling and lower gas prices…’”

Biden’s motives (or of those who run this country) behind this move should be abundantly clear.

The Devastating LA Fires

Deutsche Welle wrote on January 8:

“The Palisades fire, considered the most destructive in Los Angeles’ modern history, is just one of the blazes around Los Angeles. The Eaton fire is raging in Altadena, north of the city, whereas the Hurst fire is near the northern Los Angeles suburb of Sylmar. A fourth fire broke out on Wednesday morning in the San Fernando Valley, known as the Woodley fire.  [There are additional fires burning.]

“Los Angeles County Fire Chief Anthony Marrone… said the fire departments around Los Angeles were not equipped for ‘for this type of disaster.’ ‘There are not enough firefighters in LA county to address four separate fires of this magnitude,’ he added.”

The Sun added:

“Gusty winds and dry conditions have allowed the four major fires – the Palisades, Eaton, Hurst, and Woodley fires – to spread across multiple cities and neighborhoods in Los Angeles County… The out-of-control flames were named the ‘most destructive in history’ as they continue to grow with 0% containment…

“The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection said the Palisades Fire, which began on Monday, was sparked by a backyard fire before strong winds fanned embers to neighboring area.”

The Blame Game

The New York Post wrote on January 8:

“As Los Angeles firefighters faced down the most destructive blaze in the city’s history, they ran out of water… The water shortage was the result of years of mismanagement of LA’s water system — including a federal indictment of a leader and high profile resignations — as well as major operational problems that drained reserves too quickly…

“LA residents voiced their outrage over the conditions that allowed the fire… to rage out of control… Adding insult, Democratic Mayor Karen Bass was 7,400 miles away in Africa, and months earlier she had approved an $18 million cut to the fire department… A legacy of terrible fire management by the state of California and Gov. Gavin Newsom also hangs over the smoky skies of LA…

“The failure of LA’s water system comes after years of criticism from President-Elect Donald Trump and others that California’s leaders are not managing their water — or their fire risk properly.

“Trump pinned blame for the water shortage on Democratic Gov. Newsom — who derailed a 2020 Trump admin order redirecting water from the verdant north of the state to parched SoCal.

“Newsom’s excuse, a tiny endangered fish that has already been declared functionally extinct…”

The Sun added on January 8:

“Trump slammed California Governor Gavin Newsom’s policy decisions, which he said are responsible for the ‘apocalyptic’ burning in Los Angeles. ‘Governor Gavin Newscum refused to sign the water restoration declaration put before him that would have allowed millions of gallons of water, from excess rain and snow melt from the North, to flow daily into many parts of California, including areas that are currently burning in a virtually apocalyptic way,’ Trump wrote on Truth Social…”

Trump Plans to Sanction the ICC

Israel Today wrote on January 5:

“President-elect Donald Trump plans to implement devastating sanctions against the International Criminal Court in The Hague immediately after taking office… These executive orders could be unveiled as soon as Jan. 21.

“The sanctions package will target both individual ICC personnel, including judges and prosecutors, and the institution as a whole. The administration intends to classify the ICC as an organization threatening US interests, employing designation procedures similar to those used by the State Department for terrorist organizations globally. This designation will trigger severe restrictions on anyone involved with the court’s operations.

“Financial institutions worldwide will be required to terminate relationships with ICC personnel or face US sanctions themselves. Mirroring actions taken against sanctioned Israeli citizens by the outgoing administration, ICC staff will find themselves unable to perform routine banking operations or use credit cards. Their financial activities will be effectively frozen, with exceptions only for essential needs such as food purchases. Furthermore, all US-based assets belonging to ICC employees and the institution will be frozen.”

Facebook Gives In

The Wall Street Journal wrote on January 7:

Meta is ending fact-checking and removing restrictions on speech across Facebook and Instagram, Zuckerberg said… Tuesday, a move he described as an attempt to restore free expression on its platforms.

Trump Demands 5% From Europe

The Hill wrote on December 26:

“Trump is signaling to NATO member-states that they must spend 5 percent of their gross domestic product (GDP) annually on defense if they want U.S. support. That is a big ask. As of June 2024, of the 32 NATO countries, eight were still far short of the 2 percent of GDP threshold. Only Poland exceeds 4 percent.

“That may be sufficient in peacetime, but Russia and its Axis of Evil allies are knocking on the door. What’s more, the European continent is already engaged in an active hybrid war with Russia involving espionage, sabotage, cyber-attacks, assassinations and disinformation. Nor is it adequate for what is likely to come in the next decade. The Kremlin is rapidly preparing an even larger kinetic war against Europe…

Moscow announced in September that it was raising defense spending by 25 percent in 2025, to 6.3 percent of its GDP. That is 1.5 times current U.S. defense spending as a share of GDP, and three times NATO’s present median.

“Russia is on a war footing, but many NATO countries remain in denial of what lies ahead… Canada… currently only spends 1,4 percent of its GDP on defense. Belgium, home to NATO’s headquarters, is even worse, spending only 1.1 percent.

“Consequently, Europe is vulnerable. That goes double if Russia, in its eventual war with NATO, weaponizes European civilians by intentionally attacking hospitals, energy grids, schools and historic cultural sites, as he has all across Ukraine…

“Brussels is estimating that NATO member-states are currently only ‘able to provide less than 5 percent of air defense capacities deemed necessary to protect its members in central and eastern Europe against a full-scale attack.’” 

Trudeau Resigns

Breitbart wrote on January 6:

“Justin Trudeau announced his resignation on Monday as both prime minister and leader of the Liberal Party of Canada. Trudeau said he will remain as caretaker PM until the Liberal Party selects its new leader…

“Trudeau has been leader of the Liberal Party since 2013 and became prime minister in 2015. He has been under growing pressure to resign after a string of Liberal election defeats, party scandals, and plummeting approval ratings…

“Many members of Trudeau’s own party agreed with the opposition that Trudeau was unsuited to the task of leading Canada in tough negotiations against Trump, who has threatened to increase tariffs against Canadian goods unless its border with America is brought under control.

“The final, fatal blow to Trudeau’s administration came when his deputy prime minister and finance minister, Chrystia Freeland, resigned on December 16. Freeland wrote a scathing letter of resignation that blasted Trudeau for irresponsible spending on ‘costly political gimmicks’ in the face of Trump’s tariff threats.

“Trudeau’s administration thus became the second Western government to collapse as a result of Trump’s election, the first being the leftist ‘Traffic Light Coalition’ government in Germany. Chancellor Olaf Scholz said within hours of the U.S. election results that Trump’s return was a factor in splintering Germany’s ruling coalition.”

The analysis in the last paragraph is clearly untrue. Germany’s incompetent government had been in shambles for months, if not years.

Canada –the 51st State of the USA—Just a Joke?

The New York Post wrote on January 6:

“President-elect Donald Trump fired off more taunts at Canada’s government Monday, repeating his wish for America’s northern neighbor to become its 51st state after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced his resignation. ‘Many people in Canada LOVE being the 51st State. The United States can no longer suffer the massive Trade Deficits and Subsidies that Canada needs to stay afloat. Justin Trudeau knew this, and resigned,’ Trump, 78, wrote on Truth Social.

“‘If Canada merged with the U.S. [sic], there would be no Tariffs, taxes would go way down, and they would be TOTALLY SECURE from the threat of the Russian and Chinese Ships that are constantly surrounding them. Together, what a great Nation it would be!!!’”

Is it just a joke? Maybe not. Note the next article.

Trump Makes Strong Claims During News Conference

During a lengthy news conference at Mar-o-Lago on January 7, President elect Donald Trump stated the following, as reported by the New York Post on January 7:

“President-elect Donald Trump said Tuesday he plans to order ‘very serious tariffs’ against Canada and Mexico — and that he will rechristen the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America

“The president-elect spoke as his son, Donald Trump Jr., visited Greenland as part of his attempt to woo the island’s 56,000 residents to break with Denmark and join the United States. ‘People really don’t even know if Denmark has an illegal right to it, but if they do, they should give it up, because we need it for national security,’ Trump said at the press conference… Trump threatened to ‘tariff Denmark at a very high level’ if Copenhagen intervened…

“President-elect Donald Trump said Tuesday he wouldn’t rule out using ‘military force’ to make Greenland and the Panama Canal US territories. ‘No, I can’t assure you on either of those two,’ the incoming president told a reporter asking about the use of military force or economic coercion to acquire the territories.”

Regarding Canada joining the USA, he ruled out military intervention, but said that he would use economic pressure. He also reiterated his demand that Europe needs to pay 5% of their GDP to NATO, and that NATO would be dead without him.

He also said that all hell will break out if Hamas has not released the hostages before his inauguration. Newsmax reported that “Trump brought Middle East special envoy designee Steve Witkoff to the podium to talk about the ongoing negotiations.” Wikoff expressed his confidence that a deal would be reached before January 20.

The news broke during the conference that “U.S. District Aileen Cannon, who presided over the now-dismissed case accusing Trump of illegally holding onto classified documents, directed the Justice Department not to release the report until a federal appeals court rules on a request from Trump’s two former co-defendants in the case” (Newsmax, dated January 7). However, the JD intends to release part of Jack Smith’s report on Trump’s alleged interference and to “undo the results of the 2020 presidential election” (The New York Post, dated January 8).

Greenland a Hot Topic?

Deutsche Welle wrote on January 8:

“German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said he discussed Trump’s remarks [regarding Greenland] with other EU leaders, while reiterating that the inviolability of borders is ‘fundamental international law.’… French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot demanded that Trump should not threaten the European Union’s ‘sovereign borders.’… He added that, while he did not believe the US ‘would invade’ Greenland [‘a territory of the European Union’], ‘we have entered an era that is seeing the return of the law of the strongest.’’

Breitbart wrote on January 8:

“European leaders are reacting with alarm as past and future President Donald Trump talks up the importance of the United States acquiring Greenland, the world’s largest island and a strategically valuable if underdeveloped Arctic territory in the North Atlantic…

“Greenland’s relationship with the European Union is relatively complex. It joined the European Community in the 1970s alongside Denmark before it gained partial independence known as home rule. After getting some control over its own affairs, a referendum in Greenland in 1982 voted to leave what would later become the European Union over incompatibility between Brussels rules and Greenland’s domestic interests.

“So while Greenland is not a member of the European Union, it is still an overseas territory of an EU member state, Denmark, and consequently an associate of the bloc. Whether the island could rejoin the EU has been a matter of sporadic discussion for years, but ultimately the reasons for leaving in the first place — the EU is damaging to the national fishing industry — remain fundamentally unchanged.

“…French government spokesman Sophie Primas has also spoken out on the possibility of the United States acquiring Greenland, denouncing it as ‘a form of imperialism’. She told the council of ministers on Wednesday: ‘More than ever, we must, with our European partners, be aware, move away from a form of naivety, protect ourselves, rearm ourselves.’ Unnamed European Union officials are ‘deeply disturbed by Trump’s comments’,  London’s strongly pro-Brussels Financial Times, stating the visit by Donald Trump Junior to Greenland this week has persuaded many the future President really is serious about acquisition, rather than just talking for effect.

“The United States has attempted to buy Greenland twice before, once in the 19th century and again at the end of the Second World War. Beyond its strategic importance in controlling the north Atlantic — denying the sea to Russian submarines, essential in case of war — Greenland is also very rich in minerals.”

Controversial Florida Law Went Into Effect

LifeSiteNews wrote on January 2:

“A Florida law banning children under the age of 14 from using social media went into effect on Wednesday. [It] requires parental permission for 14- and 15-year-olds to use social media platforms such as Instagram and TikTok…

“Critics have denounced the law as a civil rights violation, and responses from parents are reportedly mixed… the ‘vast majority’ of parents polled in Florida would rather enforce their children’s social media use themselves.

“A 2023 Gallup poll found that children ages 13 and 14 spend an average of over four hours a day on social media platforms. According to a 2024 Pew Research Center study, 87 percent of children of this age range spend time on YouTube, 55 percent use TikTok, 44 percent use Snapchat, and 43 percent use Instagram.

“Commentators have observed that the law is difficult to enforce

“‘By banning social media accounts for users under 13, or under 16 without parental consent, the bill requires both teens and parents to reveal their identities to verify their relationship and the parent’s consent,’ the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression wrote in its analysis. ‘In doing so, the provision eliminates anonymity for everyone – adults and minors.’”

It should be indeed the responsibility of the parents to regulate what their children watch. A prohibition for all children under 13 to watch anything on YouTube and other social media seems to be ridiculous and dangerous at the same time. What RIGHT does the state have to get involved in these matters? This is only common practice in dictatorships.

Is Sebastian Kurz Coming?

Bild Online wrote on January 3:

“It would be the political sensation of 2025: If there are new elections in Austria after the failed coalition talks, ex-Chancellor Sebastian Kurz could run as candidate for chancellor! BILD learned from ÖVP circles: Current Chancellor Nehammer [who has in the meantime resigned as Chancellor] would be out of the race in new elections, while Kurz would be a top candidate! An ÖVP insider told BILD: ‘As things stand, we wouldn’t have a chance against the FPÖ in new elections, but with Kurz the race would be open again. Karl Nehammer has completely failed.’

“…Kurz resigned as chancellor in 2021 after there were investigations against him. He was sentenced in the first instance to a suspended sentence of eight months for making false statements, but he has appealed… At the same time, there are further investigations against Kurz, the public prosecutor’s office is investigating the ex-chancellor for breach of trust, corruption and bribery… Despite the investigation, many in the ÖVP believe Kurz would have a chance in new elections against FPÖ leader Herbert Kickl (56)…

“ÖVP insiders speak to BILD that it is currently unclear whether Kurz would actually be willing to run in the end… In fact, it is currently still unclear whether new elections will actually take place…”

Some believe Kurz could play a leading role in Europe. Prophetically speaking, however, it would make “more sense” if Kurz ran FOR and not AGAINST the FPÖ. In any event, Kurz has said that he will not serve under Kickl. What will happen now in Austria? Will FPÖ leader Herbert Kickl take over?

Handelsblatt wrote on January 5:

“The plan to deny the FPÖ the chancellorship has probably failed. The conservatives are in a shambles and will have to make do without their hopeful Sebastian Kurz for the time being… It is completely unclear who will maneuver through the coming weeks as Chancellor… After his appointment with the Federal President on Monday, Herbert Kickl is in the driver’s seat, whose strategy of waiting has fully worked out…”

The right-wing FPÖ has been compared with Germany’s right-wing AfD, for allegedly pursuing a similar agenda.

Germany in Fear

Deutsche Welle wrote on January 6:

“Austrian President Alexander Van der Bellen on Monday tasked Herbert Kickl, the leader of the far-right Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ), with the formation of a new government. Van der Bellen’s offer came after Chancellor Karl Nehammer handed in his resignation on Saturday over the collapse of coalition talks that had excluded the FPÖ.

Kickl’s party won the Austrian parliamentary election in September taking 28.8% of the vote and beating outgoing Chancellor Karl Nehammer’s conservative Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) into second place. However, Van der Bellen had tasked Nehammer with putting together a new government because no other party was willing to work with Kickl.

“On Sunday, Van der Bellen said a ‘new situation’ had emerged, noting that ‘voices within the People’s Party that rule out working with… Kickl have become significantly quieter.’..

“In Germany, conservative Christian Democrat (CDU) leader Friedrich Merz has categorically ruled out any similar cooperation with the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD). AfD party leader Alice Weidel said the so-called ‘firewall’ erected by Merz will not last. Voters do not want coalitions ‘in which left-wing parties again set the tone,’ even when there is a common majority made up of the conservatives and the AfD.’”

Barron’s wrote on January 6:

“German politicians said Monday the prospect of Austria’s far right coming to power was a ‘warning’ for Berlin’s own fractured politics while the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) cheered events in Vienna.”

The German “established” parties fear that the situation in Austria could repeat itself in Germany, meaning the AfD WILL have to be involved.

“Horror Message”: Schallenberg Becomes Interim Chancellor

orf.at wrote on January 8:

“Foreign Minister Alexander Schallenberg (ÖVP) will lead the [Austrian] government from Friday. On this day, Federal President Alexander Van der Bellen will entrust him with the continuation of the administration of the Federal Chancellery and with the chairmanship of the interim federal government… This step is necessary after the resignation of Chancellor Karl Nehammer (ÖVP) following the failure of the government negotiations between the ÖVP and SPÖ and NEOS. For Schallenberg, who will also remain foreign minister, this is his second term as head of government. After Sebastian Kurz (ÖVP) withdrew, he served as Chancellor for almost two months in 2021…

“If there is an FPÖ-ÖVP coalition, Schallenberg no longer wants to be available as foreign minister… [He] had already stated earlier that he would not be a member of a federal government under the leadership of FPÖ leader Herbert Kickl…”

Report 24 added on January 8:

“The anticipation of a possible chancellorship of FPÖ boss Herbert Kickl is currently massively dampened… Of all people, the unpopular Corona agitator Schallenberg, whose family brought Freemasonry to the country, [will] lead the government from now on… He was allowed to do so during the Corona period After [Kurz’s] resignation. He played the role of Federal Chancellor for a short time, from October 11 to December 6, 2021. Back then, he coldly told the population, ‘We will have to tighten the reins for unvaccinated people!‘… During the Corona period, Schallenberg behaved as the best pharmaceutical representative in the country… It is now clear that the government also knew that the vaccination would not work against transmission and disease… In fact, it was clear from the outset that the negative side effects occurred 25 times more often than any protective effect against ‘severe disease’ – which is also highly questionable…

“Assuming that the People’s Party continues to turn out to be an organ of globalism that is not loyal to [agreements], then after a few weeks of negotiations the FPÖ will have no choice but to request new elections… It is to be feared that Austria will suffer under the thumb [of] Schallenberg… We have already received many letters from readers warning that Austria’s approval of international treaties such as the WHO pandemic treaty will also fall during this Schallenberg period. It is likely that the ardent globalist will willingly sign any treaty that comes from the WHO, the United Nations and the World Economic Forum. Report24 editor-in-chief Florian Machl warned in several interviews that people should not rejoice too soon after Nehammer’s resignation. Now everyone can see why.”

A Lot of Things Are Wrong in Germany!

Bild Online wrote on January 3:

“If you had told me a few years ago that almost 40 injured police officers and 400 arrests on New Year’s Eve in Berlin alone wouldn’t trigger a major political debate – I wouldn’t have thought it possible…

“People notice that something is wrong when there are street battles and attacks on emergency doctors on a happy day like New Year’s Eve. When Christmas markets have to be protected with concrete barriers. When a visit to the outdoor pool is no longer possible without bag searches and security teams. If you no longer feel safe in the city center or on the bus.

“People are smarter than some politicians and authorities believe who… don’t want to say what many of these problems have to do with… [that is, with] certain young men who came to Germany illegally and in large numbers from Islamist-influenced countries – and they have a different relationship to violence, to women, Jews, homosexuals and obviously also to our state…

“But the bitterest thing is not the violence itself, but the feeling that it has no consequences… How do our police officers feel, who arrest dozens of criminals who are not even officially allowed to be in the country, but who are always released?… “

Just like in the USA…

J.D. Vance Chimes In

Die Welt wrote on January 3:

The German-American relationship is being put to the test again. Because now the designated US Vice President J. D. Vance is also polarizing with a statement about the AfD… ‘The American media slander the AfD as a kind of Nazi light. In fact, the AfD enjoys greatest popularity in the same areas of Germany that offered the greatest resistance to the Nazis.’ However, he left it open which areas Vance meant by this.

“Under the posting, a discussion developed about the truth of the statement. One user commented: ‘This is misinformation that is easy to refute.’ Other users wrote that it was exactly the other way around…”

The sad truth is that there was not much resistance to the Nazis anywhere in the first place.

The Hypocrisy of German Politicians

The Berliner Zeitung wrote on December 30, 2024:

“After Elon Musk’s guest article in the Welt am Sonntag, the capital’s political media complex exploded in convulsions of hatred: it was illegal interference, resistance had to be offered, he had to be put in his place. ‘Musk is trying to do nothing other than Putin,’ claims SPD chairman Klingbeil. Many newspapers and politicians make themselves ridiculous with such statements.

“German politicians, journalists and activists are constantly interfering unabashedly in the American election campaign… A few months ago, Klingbeil declared on the radio: ‘We want Kamala Harris in the White House.’…

“Anyone who sees this hypocrisy realizes that it’s not about interference or ‘democracy’: it’s about the political interests of parties and the media… The hatred of Musk largely stems from the fact that these blatant contradictions are becoming visible on X today…

“The ideologues and followers in parties and editorial offices feel their power dwindling due to social media. Lies, contradictions and dishonesty that were previously kept secret are becoming unavoidable. The duped react with angry gaffes and requests for censorship. Such publications must be ‘prevented’…

“Many Musk critics are not concerned with freedom of expression or democracy or the rule of law. It’s about making certain opinions taboo and shouting down their representatives… In the end, the Musk incident is just another twitch of a dying system… ‘Kill the messenger!’ is the motto of many reactions to Musk. But the message cannot be killed…”

Olaf Scholz also made a name for himself for his “election interference” for Macron when he campaigned for him and against LePen (see Bild Online, December 31: “He himself campaigned for Macron. Wasn’t that election interference, Mr. Scholz?”).

A Serious Strain?

 ntv wrote on January 1:

“The SPD parliamentary group leader in the German Bundestag, Rolf Mützenich, warned that Musk’s failures could lead to a serious strain on German-American relations. He accused the billionaire of crossing ‘the line between friendly states’ with his comments.

“Mützenich called on the federal government to clarify after Trump took office in January ‘whether the repeated disrespect, defamation and interference in the election campaign were also expressed in the name of the new US government’.”

Musk called Olaf Scholz a fool and President Steinmeier an anti-democratic tyrant.

Censorship in the German Newspaper Forest

MSN published an article around January 1 with the headline: “Habeck’s desire for state control of opinion is totalitarian.” This article is “no longer available.” The article stated:

“It is an absolute given and a journalistic achievement in the world that Musk was given the opportunity to publish his position in a commentary. Only enemies of the free state criticize this. The appropriate reaction in a fundamental rights state is not to criticize the publication. Because this is criticism of freedom of expression itself. You react by publishing your opposing position. This is democratic discourse. Media, especially the public ones, which behave in a servile and secure manner close to the state, do not serve freedom of expression and freedom of the press. They are their antagonists.

“It is the lowest point of journalism when you do not take a position against an opinion with all the argumentative conviction you have, but rather when you want to deny your ideological opponent the right to express himself at all. How can one, especially as a journalist, even think of criticizing the publication of an article that does not violate any laws but enjoys the protection of our Basic Law? That’s not the only thing that distinguishes Elon Musk from his German critics. They can all express themselves freely on X more than on other platforms–a  privilege that they use intensively against him who grants it to them, but they do not want to grant this privilege to him.

“It is pure fear of many political and media actors… fear of Trump, Musk, Milei, but even more of loss of power…”

Europe to Muzzle Elon Musk?

Apollo News wrote on January 7:

“After the US tech billionaire made explicitly positive comments about the AfD, EU MPs are now calling on the European Commission to subject Platform X to strict regulations. The reason given is suspected violations of EU law. In reality, however, it is more about redefining the limits of freedom of expression in Europe.

“According to the Handelsblatt, the corresponding application states that Musk’s ‘personal interference in the German federal election campaign, his soon-to-be key position in the US government and his power to influence the political agenda in Germany via algorithm control on Platform X’ are threats.

“This would pose nothing less than a ‘systemic risk’ for Germany and the European Union as such. For this reason, the applicants are demanding ‘urgent interim measures from the Commission to protect the federal election’. The EU parliamentarians plan to submit their request for the regulation of Platform X to the EU Commission next Friday. A broad majority is expected in the EU Parliament for the motion.

“Support for the initiative comes particularly from the Greens and the SPD. The MEP Alexandra Geese (Greens) told the Handelsblatt: ‘The Commission must urgently order emergency measures against X’… Geese receives support from Katharina Barley (SPD). She explains: ‘During the federal election, the EU must look closely at what is happening on platforms like X, Facebook and Instagram.’ Elon Musk has nothing less in his sights than [fighting] liberal democracy. The US billionaire wants to weaken the existing cornerstones of the free-democratic basic order. ‘We won’t allow that,’ continued MEP Barley.”

Report 24 added on January 8:

“The EU Commission wants to muzzle Elon Musk because of his planned interview with Alice Weidel [AfD]… Commission spokesman Thomas Regnier announced… that they will closely examine how Musk’s Platform will promote the interview. They rely on the on the ‘Digital Services Act’ – the bureaucratic masterpiece that is supposed to protect freedom of expression. The same freedom of expression that is now apparently being restricted because a billionaire dares to speak to a democratically elected opposition leader.

“The commission seriously warns against ‘above-average visibility’ of the interview. With his over 200 million followers, Musk naturally has an enormous reach – regardless of whether he tweets about electric cars, Mars rockets or German politics. What’s more: Most of his followers aren’t even people from Germany, so you couldn’t really speak of any real potential election influence…

“The whole farce reveals the increasing nervousness of the political establishment in view of the upcoming new elections [in Germany]…”

Jens Spahn—a Real Danger!

TAZ wrote on January:

“Many see the CDU member as a real danger.

“Jens Spahn, 44, has been a member of the Bundestag for 22 years and was Parliamentary State Secretary in the Ministry of Finance and Federal Minister of Health. The pandemic briefly made the conservative ‘Münsterlander’ [coming from the area of Münsterland in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany] with a negative image the most popular politician in Germany. Since the Union’s defeat in the last federal election, he has no longer held a particularly prominent position. But for months you can’t get past Spahn… [his] main thing is to get attention. Someone [Spahn] gets into position.

“For Spahn, the question is whether he will become part of the new federal government. And to remain one of the players for the time afterwards… Legal foundations can ultimately be changed if one creates the political majorities… The right to asylum, as regulated in the Basic Law and in international agreements, would be perdu…

“Thomas Biebricher, a politics professor from Frankfurt, is an expert on European conservatism… ‘Jens Spahn is one of the most dangerous people in the CDU orbit,’ says Biebricher on the phone. Spahn is rhetorically gifted, willing to make populist statements, has a certain unscrupulousness – and… great ambition. ‘One can imagine that Jens Spahn would be willing to transform Christian democracy into something that is no longer Christian democracy.’

“On the one hand, Spahn is valued for his hard work and perseverance; some people admire his good networking and willingness to address even uncomfortable things. When he comes, the hall is full. Spahn, opponents also say, is an exceptional political talent

“But there are also doubts about his loyalty. [There is] discomfort with his strong ambition. Because he likes to put himself in front of others who then have to clean up after him…

“Spahn [carries] some baggage around with him. The expensive mask purchases from the beginning of the pandemic, for example, because of which the federal government is now threatened with 2.3 billion euros in back payments. The purchase of his villa in Berlin for several million euros together with his husband, the financing of which raised questions…

“Spahn definitely wants to govern…”

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News

More Terrible Animal Experiments “to Save People’s Lives”?

Daily Mail wrote on December 27:

Thousands of animals have been blown up, poisoned or given deadly nerve agents during top-secret tests at a military laboratory, MailOnline can reveal. More than 2,000 pigs, rabbits, monkeys, guinea pigs and mice have been killed in ‘barbaric’ experiments at the secretive Porton Down research base in Wiltshire. The figures cover the last three years and were revealed following a Freedom of Information request by MailOnline. 

“But they have sparked outrage from animal rights campaigners… the Ministry of Defence (MoD)… said the tests were part of ‘life-saving’ research to help better protect British troops, and ‘cannot be conducted without the use of laboratory animals’. But Dr Julia Baines, senior science policy manager for animal campaign group Peta, lambasted the MoD for the tests… ‘Peta calls shame on the Ministry of Defence for conducting archaic and appallingly cruel experiments on monkeys, mice, pigs, and other animals, including injecting deadly viruses into their brains and exposing them to nerve agents,’ Dr Baines said. 

“Porton Down is the UK’s top secret laboratory where scientists carry out research into [biological and] chemical weapons and deadly diseases. Under constant armed guard, the secluded base contains some of the most lethal diseases known to man – including ebola, plague and anthrax…

“The MoD refused to specify exactly how each animal was killed in the most recent figures… However, previous experiments have seen live pigs being shot and forced to inhale mustard gas, monkeys being infected with anthrax and guinea pigs being killed with nerve agent. 

“Other tests have involved pigs wearing body armour and being blown up, with scientists attempting to replicate severe battlefield trauma to test how well next-generation flak jackets can protect soldiers from injury… In all, figures show 64 guinea pigs, 97 marmosets, 83 pigs, three rabbits and 1,797 mice were killed in experiments at Porton Down between 2021 and 2023.

“An MoD spokeswoman told MailOnline: ‘The Defence Science and Technology Laboratory conducts experiments ethically, in line with legislation… [It] develops new vaccines, therapies and treatments that can save people’s lives.’”

With that line, everything is justified, and it‘s all in the context of WAR! We heard it before. Ridiculous governmental corona restrictions were enacted “to save people’s lives,” it was claimed.

Steinmeier’s Wisdom… But Who Cares?

The Guardian wrote on December 27:

“Germany’s president, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, has dissolved parliament and called a snap election on 23 February after Olaf Scholz’s fractious three-way coalition collapsed three years into its mandate. The national vote will come seven months ahead of schedule amid a rocky stretch of unusual political turmoil for the EU’s top economic power…

“Steinmeier – whose office is largely ceremonial – warned… against allowing ‘hatred and violence’ to erode German society… Steinmeier warned… of ‘outside influence’ in the campaign, specifically citing recent ‘open and blatant’ attempts to sway the vote on the social media channel X, used by its owner, Elon Musk, last week to endorse the anti-immigration, anti-Islam … AfD party.  

“… All the mainstream parties have pledged not to work with the far right after the election. Because the CDU/CSU is unlikely to win an absolute majority, it is expected to form a coalition with a party to its left. Most likely at this point is a tie-up with the Social Democrats (SPD), who are polling at about 16%.

“The timing could hardly be worse for Germany’s political gridlock, with a new government not expected to be in place until the late spring, as the incoming US president Donald Trump threatens biting tariffs against the all-important car industry and Russia makes gains in Ukraine despite Berlin’s billions of euros in military assistance to Kyiv.  The current parliament will remain in place until the new one is elected…”

Steinmeier’s time to step down is long overdue. And Germany is presently stumbling from one debacle to the next.

Musk Does It Again…

Reuters wrote on December 28:

“U.S. billionaire Elon Musk backed Germany’s Alternative for Germany (AfD) in a guest opinion piece for Germany’s Welt am Sonntag newspaper published online on Saturday… In the commentary… Musk expanded on his post on social media platform X last week claiming that ‘only the AfD can save Germany.’

“Shortly after the piece was published online, the editor of the opinion section, Eva Marie Kogel, wrote on X that she had submitted her resignation, with a link to the commentary. ‘Democracy and journalism thrive on freedom of expression. This includes dealing with polarising positions and classifying them journalistically,’ the newspaper’s editor-in-chief designate Jan Philipp Burgard and Ulf Poschardt, who takes over as publisher on Jan. 1, told Reuters. They said discussion about Musk’s piece, which had around 340 comments several hours after it was published, was ‘very revealing.’

“Underneath Musk’s commentary, the newspaper published a response by Burgard. ‘Musk’s diagnosis is correct, but his therapeutic approach, that only the AfD can save Germany, is fatally false,’ he wrote, referencing the AfD’s desire to leave the European Union and seek rapprochement with Russia as well as appease China. The AfD backing from Musk, who also defended his right to weigh in on German politics due to his ‘significant investments,’ comes as Germans are set to vote on Feb. 23 after a coalition government led by Chancellor Olaf Scholz collapsed.”

Musk (Trump) vs. Germany’s Political “Establishment”

MSN wrote on December 30:

“Musk, who is set to serve Donald Trump’s new administration as an outside adviser, endorsed the AfD as Germany’s last hope in a guest opinion piece for the Welt am Sonntag newspaper… The [German] government spokesperson said Musk’s endorsement of the AfD was ‘a recommendation to vote for a party that is being monitored (by domestic intelligence) on suspicion of being right-wing extremist and which has already been recognised as partly right-wing extremist’.

“German politicians have excoriated Musk for his endorsement of the AfD, with the co-leader of Scholz’s Social Democrats (SPD) comparing him to Russian President Vladimir Putin. ‘Both want to influence our elections and specifically support the AfD’s enemies of democracy. They want Germany to be weakened and plunged into chaos,’ Lars Klingbeil told the Funke news group on Monday…”

This is of course utter nonsense, but it shows the growing animosity between Germany and the USA.

Spahn Attacks Musk

Deutsche Welle added on December 28:

“In the editorial, [Musk] said the far-right party was the ‘last spark of hope’ for the country. ‘The portrayal of the AfD as right-wing extremist is clearly false, considering that Alice Weidel, the party’s leader, has a same-sex partner from Sri Lanka! Does that sound like Hitler to you? Please!’ Musk said in the piece…

“Musk went on to claim that the AfD adopts strong positions on issues relating to economic recovery, energy supply and migration control. ‘The AfD, even though it is described as far-right, represents a political realism that resonates with many Germans who feel that their concerns are ignored by the establishment. It addresses the problems of the moment — without the political correctness that often obscures the truth,’ the tech billionaire continued.

“Musk also said the AfD was ‘committed to a controlled immigration policy that gives priority to integration and the preservation of German culture and security. This is not about xenophobia, but about ensuring that Germany does not lose its identity in the pursuit of globalization.’…

“Musk’s backing of the AfD has sent shockwaves through Berlin, with some lawmakers this week accusing the SpaceX chief of interfering in German politics…”

Member of the German Bundestag Jens Spahn (CDU) placed the following comments to Musk’s statement on X:

“Elon Musk says, look beyond the labels of the AfD. Now, let’s do it then: The AfD wants to leave NATOreactivate Nord Stream 2, and is anti-US, pro-Putin and pro-Russia. Is that what the USA wants? A Germany that turns towards Russia and away from the USA? The AfD wants to leave the Eurozone, our by far largest trading partner. We conduct ~40% of our trade within Eurozone. Without the Euro and the EU, the German economy would completely collapse. Incidentally, the AfD was against the construction of the Tesla factory in Grünheide. If it were up to the AfD, there would be no investment from Elon Musk in Germany at all. Perhaps he should remember that as well. And by the way, no one needs the AfD for less regulation, a stop to illegal mass migration and against ideological energy policies. Other parties also stand for that. But without far-right extremists, conspiracy theorists, and antisemites in their ranks.”

Friedrich Merz, head of the CDU, not wanting to be undone by Spahn who wants to become popular again, responded as well one day later. He told the Funke media group: “I cannot recall, in the history of Western democracies, that there has been a comparable case of interference in the electoral campaign of a friendly country” (See Deutsche Welle, December 29).

AfD’s election program (which is ever-changing) is not without controversy, to be sure. But the party is sometimes criticized for the wrong reasons, while criticism is not noticeable where it should be raised. Note the next article.

AfD’s New Election Program

MSN wrote on December 29:

“After a survey, the AfD wants to change its electoral concept and now demand a reinstatement of compulsory military service… Party leader Tino Chrupalla and the Federal Program Commission had deleted the classic AfD demand for a reinstatement of compulsory military service from the election program. In view of the fear of an expansion of the war in Ukraine, which the AfD is relying on in the election campaign, especially in the East, conscription is not a ‘winning issue’. Top candidate and party leader Alice Weidel sees it differently – and apparently so did a majority of the AfD base in a survey. As a result, the Federal Program Commission is now requesting that compulsory military service be included in the election program.

“The base also rejected a dusty family picture. In the draft election program, the family generally stood for security, trust, mutual care, protection and support. The family model of AfD top candidate Weidel, who lives with her wife and children, would have been included for the first time. But two motions for the party conference now demand that, according to the AfD program, a family should consist of ‘father, mother and children’. The responsible federal specialist committee also refers to the mood among the party base.

“Another point of contention is abortion. The radical opponents in the party had prevailed in the draft program. “Abortion must remain the absolute exception, for example if there is a criminological or medical indication,” it now says.”

We would agree with the definition of family. However, abortion should never occur, and mandatory military service is absolutely wrong. But it will come, as it is prophesied to happen.

Musk Responds

Deutsche Welle reported on December 31:

[“Musk wrote about President Steinmeier in response to his attack on Musk:} ‘Steinmeier is an anti-democratic tyrant!’ Musk wrote in English. ‘Shame on him.’..’

“The spokesman for the leader of the AfD, Alice Weidel, said concrete plans were underway for an online meeting between her and Musk. That came after Musk himself suggested a meeting between the two via X’s Spaces chat feature. ‘Wait until Alice and I do an X Spaces conversation. They will lose their minds,’ he posted. 

“Germany’s Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck on Tuesday hit out at Musk… ‘Elon Musk is equipped with billions and unbridled communication power,’ Habeck wrote on X. ‘His call for the AfD is systematic: He wants to weaken Europe. Power must be limited: no business model must destroy our democracy. Europe must now use its power consistently.’”

Other German political leaders said that Musk’s attack on Steinmeier is an attack on all Germans; and that it must be clarified whether Trump is sharing Musk’s statements.

The animosity between Germany and the USA is becoming more and more dangerous.

Germany’s Migration Policy Has Failed

Bild Online wrote on December 30:

“The failure of Germany’s migration policy is making headlines around the world. ‘Germany Opened Its Doors to Migrants. Now It’s Struggling to Cope,’ is the headline of the renowned US newspaper ‘Wall Street Journal.’ Germany has become a case study for problems that arise when migration exceeds a society’s ability to adapt.

“The Americans ruthlessly list how large the influx of refugees and migrants was (especially from Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan). And what illegal immigration means for the German social system and internal security.

“Since 2015, Germany has taken in 2.4 million asylum seekers – twice the population of Munich, according to the newspaper.

“Germany has even overtaken the immigration country USA in terms of the proportion of migrants. In 2021, 18.8 percent of the population in Germany were foreigners, in the United States 15.3 percent…

Job integration is often not successful: The unemployment rate for non-citizens was 14.7 percent last year, compared to 5 percent for citizens.

“In the USA, asylum seekers do not normally receive any money from the state, but are allowed to work quickly. In Germany, things are different: here they can only work after being officially recognized as refugees, which can take months or even years. Instead, they are entitled to benefits that can amount to hundreds or thousands of euros per month. The cost to the federal budget alone: ​​29.7 billion euros last year.

More than half of all welfare recipients now have a migrant background: More than 60 percent of people in Germany who rely on state benefits were born abroad or belong to the second generation of migrants.

“Migrants are also massively overrepresented in crime statistics: Non-citizens, who make up 15 percent of the population, were responsible for 41 percent of all crimes in 2023, according to police statistics…

The reception of Ukrainians in Germany has failed from a purely economic perspective – unlike in other countries. Only 18 percent of the more than one million Ukrainian refugees work and earn enough not to claim benefits. In Great Britain, the figure is 65 percent, in Poland 61 percent.”

It is only because the AfD in particular has long been pointing out these grievances that other parties are now also admitting to them in order not to lose even more votes.

Magdeburg—No One Knows Anything… Or Doesn’t Want to Know Anything!

Bild Online wrote on December 30:

“Magdeburg attack: Much is already known – but NOTHING is clear!… According to BILD information, there were warnings on July 30, November 28, 2023, and September 2, 2024. The BND [Bundesnachrichtendienst, i.e., Federal Intelligence Service ]received these and passed them on. But the BND had to reveal the exact content of these warnings to the MPs in a room in the basement of the Bundestag building that was specially secured against eavesdropping.

“In the Interior Committee, which was meeting in private, there was a scandal right at the start: [Federal Interior Minister Nancy] Faeser was unable to present a chronology of reports and investigations by the federal police and secret services that had been promised to the Bundestag factions a week ago…

“Green Party expert Konstantin von Notz (53) explained that it could not be ‘that this time, as with the Love Parade disaster and the Berlin Christmas market attack, no one takes political responsibility.’

“According to BILD information, there are a total of 80 police cases involving him [the mass murderer] as a perpetrator or complainant. In addition, there are six reports from foreign security services that are supposed to deal with the Twitter threats made by their nationals…”

It is high time that Faeser resigned.

Terror Attack in New Orleans

The Sun wrote on January 1, 2025:

At least [15] people were killed [with another 30 injured] when the city’s famed Bourbon Street became a bloodbath after the gunman ploughed his white pick-up into revellers before opening fire. He was then gunned down by cops and killed.

“The FBI have named the suspect as 42-year-old Shamsud Din Jabbar – a US citizen from Texas. Jabbar is a US Army veteran and was wearing full body armour and armed with an assault rifle for the attack. They do not believe he was solely responsible for the attack

“The FBI said an ISIS flag was found attached to a white pipe sticking up from the hitch of the rented Ford pickup. Pipe bombs were found inside the car and concealed within coolers and were wired for remote detonation, a state police intelligence bulletin obtained by AP said…

“Police superintendent Anne Kirkpatrick said the gunman drove the pick-up truck down Bourbon Street ‘at a very fast pace’ and was ‘intentional’ ‘trying to run over as many people as he possibly could’.

She said: “This is not just an act of terrorism. This is evil.”…

“Jabbar had only converted to Islam within the last year and was ‘being all crazy’ the new husband of his ex-wife said.”

Explosion in Front of Trump Hotel in Las Vegas

Breitbart wrote on January 1, 2025:

“The Tesla Cybertruck explosion in front of the Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas has led to one death and seven injuries, officials said. The driver of the electric vehicle parked in the valet area outside of the hotel’s lobby before it burst into flames and exploded with ‘fireworks-style mortars onboard’ on New Year’s Day around 8:40 a.m. local time…  The driver is the only known death, and seven people nearby sustained minor wounds…

“It is unclear… if the fire was purposeful — but authorities said they are investigating the incident as a possible act of terror…”

The New York Post added on January 1:

“Investigators did… determine that the Tesla truck was rented through the Turo app, the same one used to rent the pickup truck used in the New Orleans attack, law enforcement sources told The Post… Police also confirmed that the Cybertruck was filled with fireworks-style mortars…”

Please view in this regard our new StandingWatch program, titled, “Who Was Behind the Terror Attacks in Germany, New Orleans and Las Vegas?”

No Hostage Deal with Hamas

The Jerusalem Post wrote on December 28:

“A ceasefire and hostage deal had not been reached yet because Hamas ‘does not want there to be a deal,’… Netanyahu said in the weekly government meeting on Sunday…

“The message conveyed to ministers was that ‘the negotiations for the hostage deal were stuck,’ with Hamas ‘constantly trying to change direction in the talks.’ The ministers were also told that Hamas returned to demanding an end to the war as conditional for any deal.”

Breitbart wrote on January 1, 2025:

“The Iranian-backed terror group Hamas has decided to call President-elect Donald Trump’s bluff and abandon negotiations toward a hostage deal, waiting instead to see if it can get a better deal when he takes office January 20. Trump said at Mar-a-Lago on New Year’s Eve, ‘They better let the hostages come back soon,’ reiterating a threat that there would be ‘ALL HELL TO PAY’ if Hamas did not free its remaining 100 Israeli hostages by his Inauguration.

“But Hamas has decided that it would rather take its chances — and evidently believes that Trump will not do anything

“The sticking points are the precise number of living hostages to be released in the first phase of a deal; the identities of Palestinian terrorists to be released from Israeli prisoners; and whether a deal would bring the war to an end.

Hamas is determined to survive and to return to power in the Middle East. It fired two short-range rockets at Israel at midnight on New Year’s Eve — a weaker barrage than it used to greet 2024, but a sign that it is still committed to war.”

Jimmy Carter Died

The New York Post wrote on December 29:

“Jimmy Carter, the Georgia peanut farmer who became the 39th president of the United States during a time of gas shortages, Cold War drama and the Iran hostage crisis, died Sunday. He was 100. Carter was the longest-living president in U.S. history…

“Carter was sworn in on Jan. 20, 1977, after defeating Republican Gerald Ford, whose campaign was burdened by the political baggage he carried from his decision to pardon disgraced President Richard Nixon following the Watergate scandal. He served only one tumultuous four-year term before being swept aside by Ronald Reagan — but in that time he racked up triumphs such as the historic Camp David peace accords, in which Israel and Egypt officially recognized each other’s governments… But there were also fiascoes…

“Carter’s presidency was marred by events both within and out of his control. In 1979, a pair of international crises erupted — the Russian invasion of Afghanistan, which led Carter to cancel US participation in the 1980 Moscow Summer Olympics; and the storming of the US Embassy in Tehran following which 52 Americans were held captive for 444 days.

“A failed rescue effort by the US military in April 1980 led to the deaths of eight American service members, and crippled Carter’s credibility on national security ahead of that year’s presidential election.

“Carter was also buffeted by economic forces, as the OPEC-induced fuel crisis of the early 1970s helped lead to paralyzing ‘stagflation,’ a brutal cocktail of persistently high inflation combined with high unemployment and stagnant demand…

“The Republican [Ronald Reagan] would hand Carter one of the most crushing election losses ever, winning 44 of the 50 states, while the Democrat took the other six plus the District of Columbia.

“After leaving the White House, Carter turned his attention to humanitarian and charitable endeavors, notably his decades-long commitment to the Habitat for Humanity program, which developed housing for the poor, and the Carter Presidential Center to promote human rights.

“Carter was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002…”

Breitbart added on December 27:

“He endured more than four decades of being described as a failed president. However, many of his ideas were revived under President Joe Biden, whose policies today arguably mirror those of the Carter administration.”

Many used to consider Carter as the weakest and most ineffective president in modern history… until Biden showed up.

New Year’s Resolution for Congress and the Executive

Ron Paul wrote on December 30 in the Ron Paul Institute:

“Next month the 119th US Congress will be sworn in, with Republican majorities in both Houses. With every opinion poll we see how the US public holds Congress in contempt. How about doing something about it? What about returning to the Constitution? That means no more 1,500 page omnibus spending bills which hide countless unconstitutional surveillance, censorship, and police state measures behind convoluted legislative language…

“Americans are rightly furious that President Biden has sent as much as $200 billion to fund Ukraine’s futile war with Russia, but where did Biden get that money? From Congress… Every US foreign policy fiasco of the 21st century could have been prevented had Congress only had the courage to say ‘no’ when the President and the military-industrial complex demanded money for a new overseas conflict.

“Next, the Executive Branch. On January 20th we will begin the second Trump Administration. Trump appealed to war-weary American voters by promising no new wars and an end to the current conflicts we are involved in overseas. A good place to start would be an announcement on day one that US troops would be removed from Syria. We learned only last week that the Biden Administration had been lying to us about the number of troops in Syria, but the real question is why do we have troops there at all? Trump rightly said it is not our war, so why not just march home?

“Likewise, Ukraine. As a parting ‘gift’ to the American people, President Biden just announced another six billion to Ukraine. Most of that money – like the billions before – will end up in the hands of the US military-industrial complex, with a few billion stolen by the corrupt Ukraine government. Even the US mainstream media admits that Ukraine has lost the war. So why are we draining the US treasury and draining the population of Ukraine for a lost cause? President Trump: end the funding and end the war.”

Another Scandalous Decision in Canada

Rebel News wrote on December 23:

“Pastor Derek Reimer of Mission 7 Ministries in Calgary appeared in court for sentencing November 27, 2024, after being found guilty in August of criminal harassment… The criminal harassment charges stem from a conversation Reimer had with Saddletowne Public Library service delivery manager Shannon Slater.

“Reimer approached the library manager to ask why the library was hosting events where adults dressed in drag read books to children, often encouraging the children’s exploration of sexual identity and promoting non-traditional values. Slater declined to engage in the conversation and asked Reimer to leave, which he did without hesitation. During the brief exchange, Reimer mentioned that he would likely return to protest.

Reimer published this brief interaction on social media, urging others to voice their disapproval towards this manager for allowing such events to occur. Slater argued that this should fall within the scope of criminal harassment…

“Today, December 23, Justice Molle delivered Reimer’s sentence, which includes the following: A $500 fine… 12 months conditional sentence, or, in other words, house arrest… 2 years probation. Some of the terms include:… Must write a letter of apology to Shannon Slater… Must complete an anger management course and provide proof of counselling… 100 hours of community service work… Prohibited from entertaining friends at his personal home… Must remain in the province of Alberta unless granted approval. Reimer is permitted to participate in religious services outside of his home upon approval by his supervisor.”

Can one believe such an outrageous decision?

Trudeau Must Resign as Prime Minister

National Post wrote on December 24:

“69 per cent of Canadians now think Prime Minister Justin Trudeau should resign… 72 per cent of respondents said they were dissatisfied with the Trudeau government…

“Following the sudden resignation from cabinet of Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland last week, more than a third of the 153 Liberals in caucus are now resolved to pursue Trudeau’s immediate resignation… Trudeau isn’t even all that popular among Liberal diehards.”

Maybe Trudeau should accept Trump’s offer and become governor of the 51st state of the USA?

“No Child Is Born in the Wrong Body!”

Breitbart wrote on December 30:

“Harry Potter creator and women’s rights activist J.K. Rowling has told her fans on social media that there is no such thing as a transgender kid and that no child is born in the ‘wrong body.’… [She wrote:] ‘There are only adults…, prepared to sacrifice the health of minors to bolster [their] belief in an ideology that will end up wreaking more harm than lobotomies and false memory syndrome combined.’

“In another post, Rowling blamed some of society’s problems on a type of cultural contamination where social media convinces children that they are transgender… saying, ‘Kids are watching TikTok videos of surgeons selling the idea that bodies can be modified like Lego. Schools affirm kids’ trans identities behind parents’ backs. A certain kids’ charity in the UK sent out breast binders to pubescent girls without parental consent… Many parents are struggling to protect kids from a Zeitgeist telling them that anxieties about puberty, sexuality and growing up can be fixed by lifelong reliance on Big Pharma and by doctors who make Frankenstein look ethical,’ she added.

“Rowling went on to say that parents are facing strong headwinds as schools and the Internet continue to push transgenderism on kids outside the home. She also blasted the entire scheme of transgenderism for pushing a false nirvana. She noted that transgender medical intervention ‘causes infertility, the loss of the ability to orgasm and a lifetime’s reliance on powerful hormones your body wasn’t designed to cope with,’ she wrote.

“Rowling has been a staunch voice in opposition to transgender ‘women’ in sports and recently pointed out that men claiming to be transgender female athletes have stolen hundreds of medals and championships from female athletes… Adding more credence to her position, the British national health system has announced a ban on puberty blockers and other transgender procedures for minors.”

Smoking DOES Kill You!

The Guardian wrote on December 29:

“Smokers are being urged to kick the habit for 2025 after a fresh assessment of the harms of cigarettes found they shorten life expectancy even more than doctors thought. Researchers at University College London found that on average a single cigarette takes about 20 minutes off a person’s life, meaning that a typical pack of 20 cigarettes can shorten a person’s life by nearly seven hours.

“According to the analysis, if a smoker on 10 cigarettes a day quits on 1 January, they could prevent the loss of a full day of life by 8 January. They could boost their life expectancy by a week if they quit until 5 February and a whole month if they stop until 5 August. By the end of the year, they could have avoided losing 50 days of life, the assessment found. ‘People generally know that smoking is harmful but tend to underestimate just how much,’ said Dr Sarah Jackson, a principal research fellow at UCL’s alcohol and tobacco research group. ‘On average, smokers who don’t quit lose around a decade of life. That’s 10 years of precious time, life moments, and milestones with loved ones.’

“Smoking is one of the world’s leading preventable causes of disease and death, killing up to two-thirds of long-term users. It causes about 80,000 deaths a year in the UK and a quarter of all cancer deaths in England…

“‘Some people might think they don’t mind missing out on a few years of life, given that old age is often marked by chronic illness or disability. But smoking doesn’t cut short the unhealthy period at the end of life,’ Jackson told the Guardian. ‘It primarily eats into the relatively healthy years in midlife, bringing forward the onset of ill-health. This means a 60-year-old smoker will typically have the health profile of a 70-year-old non-smoker.’

“Although some smokers live long lives, others develop smoking-related diseases and even die from them in their 40s. The variation is driven by differences in smoking habits such as the type of cigarette used, the number of puffs taken and how deeply smokers inhale. People also differ in how susceptible they are to the toxic substances in cigarette smoke.

“The authors stress that smokers must quit completely to get the full benefits to health and life expectancy. Previous work has shown there is no safe level of smoking: the risk of heart disease and stroke is only about 50% lower for people who smoke one cigarette a day compared with those who smoke 20 a day. ‘Stopping smoking at every age is beneficial, but the sooner smokers get off this escalator of death the longer and healthier they can expect their lives to be,’ they write.”

Smoking is sin. It is egoistic and thoroughly carnal and shows a complete disregard and lack of love for oneself and others. It is a form of slow suicide… another sin.

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

©2025 Church of the Eternal God
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.